This Is Proof That Gaijin Is Bad At Balancing Jets (War Thunder)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2022
  • We're like ants running around in a circle only to exhaust ourselves and die.
    ▶AIRMODELS: bit.ly/3c1PtOy
    ▶IN-GAME DECAL: bit.ly/2YzOxPP
    ▶MERCH: teespring.com/en-GB/stores/sp...
    ▶TWITCH: / spit_flyer
    ▶TWITTER: / spit_flyer
    ▶PATREON: / spit_flyer
    ▶DISCORD: / discord
    Thanks for all the support. It means more than you know :)
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 576

  • @Spitflyer
    @Spitflyer  Рік тому +19

    Airmodels is having 15% off storewide so if you wanna pick something up for Christmas now is the time! Using this link supports the channel: bit.ly/3c1PtOy

    • @nothisismyopinion
      @nothisismyopinion Рік тому +1

      Where can I get br changes

    • @krisztianszabo1440
      @krisztianszabo1440 Рік тому +1

      I'm sorry to say that Spit_flyer... but. The reality is this isn't the first video i've seen throughout the years regarding these glaring issues within the game, or the marketing strategy of gaijin. As usual you are 100% right about the topic, as so the rest of the CCs on their own videos. Problem is, this all changes nothing. There is nothing to be done, we as a community failed to help, fix this situation years ago. Actually we've tried but the company found ways to silence people, or just outright punish anyone trying to bring light to their ways of dealing with these things.
      But most importantly their marketing strategy is justified. How come i say that? Just look at War thunder Steam chart page to see the graph for active players. In the past few years the player numbers have quadrupled... And then you and many other CCs say that "The game is dieing, they are killing the game" Yes and no. Yes they are killing parts of the game, and No becouse there are still a massive influx of new players (paying customers) as most people are coming to play tanks. They buy shiny new premiums, play a little and realise the CAS problem of ground forces.. They might endure, or leave.. but then 4 new players join their places. And at the end who wins? Yes... Gaijin. Till the money flows, the game won't be changed, and won't be fixed. That simple.
      And even then... if the flow of money reduces? Just let the game run as long as it's profitable then they'll close curtains.. But until then, just look at the steam charts.

    • @nagykiss6020
      @nagykiss6020 Рік тому

      You misspelled gayjin. This is the correct form, for this company and the "people" "working" there.

  • @slow2serious860
    @slow2serious860 Рік тому +418

    Imagine next patch: "javelin performs too poorly in uptiers vs mig19, it goes down to 8.0 to sit right next to vampire"

    • @TheContinuation
      @TheContinuation Рік тому +24

      Sadly enough, this is an actual possibility thanks to Gaijin's stupidity

    • @threemountainsgaming7560
      @threemountainsgaming7560 Рік тому +27

      Me 262 A performs too poorly in uptiers vs javelin, it goes down to 6.7 to sit right next to the F7F

    • @frya2342
      @frya2342 Рік тому +6

      Fuck it why not P.1 Electric Lightning to 11.3 might as well

    • @Razurik001
      @Razurik001 Рік тому +5

      Sit right next to a spitfire you mean ?

    • @slow2serious860
      @slow2serious860 Рік тому +3

      @@Razurik001 it was still 7.0 last time I checked, but I wouldn't put it beyond Gaijin to raise it again

  • @ultra_gagayay
    @ultra_gagayay Рік тому +259

    Su-11. Litterally all the proof you need

    • @colRobinOlds
      @colRobinOlds Рік тому

      Yeah. Unless the guy who plays it is completely braindead you stand no chance in your flimsy F-80

    • @JimmySaulGoodmanMcGill1960
      @JimmySaulGoodmanMcGill1960 Рік тому +22

      it's literally better in every way except its guns than the tech tree su-9 while being at the same br. p2w my beloved

    • @LarryPigeon1
      @LarryPigeon1 Рік тому +9

      Same br as the kikka jap 7.0 is just fucked for me

    • @mikewizz1895
      @mikewizz1895 Рік тому +18

      @@LarryPigeon1 same br as spitfire mk24

    • @danko8983
      @danko8983 Рік тому +9

      @@JimmySaulGoodmanMcGill1960 has the same performance or even better than the F2H Banshee at a whole battle rating lower, and nearly identical performance to the F9F Cougar

  • @Registered_Simp
    @Registered_Simp Рік тому +252

    Gaijin in 2025 be like "So guys, we're lowering the BR of the A-10C with Aim-9M's to 9.0 because it was getting clapped too hard by the Mig-29A's at 10.3 which are there because the F-15C's equipped with Aim-120A's at 11.7 clapped just a tad too hard"

    • @maccarr9923
      @maccarr9923 Рік тому +9

      What are they gonna do when we get to X-wings

    • @Registered_Simp
      @Registered_Simp Рік тому +9

      @@maccarr9923 Nothing new. Imagine being limited to cannons and short-range "torpedoes" and having to face down an F-22A. Solid nope from me dawg...

    • @maccarr9923
      @maccarr9923 Рік тому +2

      @@Registered_Simp But orbital spawn, 40g+ turns and shields + roboGoose

    • @Registered_Simp
      @Registered_Simp Рік тому

      @@maccarr9923 Last I saw those things aren't exactly speed demons compared to IRL jet capability. Additionally, just cause the aircraft is pulling 40G's does not necessarily mean the missile targeting it has to pull 40G's. Worst comes to worst the Raptor or whatever facing it can just run away.

    • @raptorjesus7273
      @raptorjesus7273 Рік тому +2

      @@Registered_Simp gaijin on their way to not model concussion missiles

  • @ashman8891
    @ashman8891 Рік тому +21

    Q: Show me proof that gaijin is bad at balancing jets
    A: Su-11

  • @kirishima638
    @kirishima638 Рік тому +229

    The BR system has been stretched beyond breaking point. WT is at its heart, a WW2 flight sim with ground and naval units added. A balancing system intended to cover a 5 year period is now expected to cover 60+ years. Vehicles that are decades apart are placed at the same or similar battle ratings. You cannot reduce the performance of a vehicle to a single notch on a scale that progresses with .3 increments and sees vehicles face opponents from a full 1.0 ahead. It's rediculous.

    • @acolbymyers
      @acolbymyers Рік тому +29

      i have been saying it for years that we need to raise the BR to 15 and give some breathing room between the ranks

    • @simisg2121
      @simisg2121 Рік тому +18

      Yeah, the game was great when it was just a WWII flight sim ‘ish’. No idea why they started adding all this other crap aside from they needed to make money I guess.

    • @kwilliams3161
      @kwilliams3161 Рік тому +21

      @@simisg2121 they added all this other “crap” because ppl kept asking for it.they didn’t even have plans to add supersonic jets to the game until ppl got bored of the at the time top tier cl13 Sabre and started asking for more.

    • @faasnuhind8578
      @faasnuhind8578 Рік тому +14

      Honestly, I was pissed when I first hit 5.0-6.0 for Germany, and was having WW2 tanks having to square off against cold war Era vehicles. I get that Germany had alot of vehicles, but it ruins the joy of getting a Tiger II, just to get destroyed by a tank that came into being ten to twenty years after it ended service. Ironically, Naval has a hilarious example with the G2 Japanese ship. It faces off against WW2 Era vessels, while it is rocking a chain gun and is an extremely mobile modern boat. Like how is that good?
      Honestly, I hated playing Germany as AR 234B because I don't feel it belonged at 6.0. It is easily caught up to by prop planes, unless it drops load, which it also has a small load, and has no way to defend itself. Just because it has a jet engine, doesn't automatically make it go up a BR, if anything, I don't think it should be in the game.

    • @kirishima638
      @kirishima638 Рік тому +13

      @@kwilliams3161 Gaijin doesn't give a single shit about what people ask for. People have been asking for BR decompression, a ground only mode, better map rotation etc etc for years and Gaijin don't care.
      Go visit the forums. They are full unanswered feature requests, polls and complaints. Whenever Gaijin announce BR or Economy changes there is a backlash and they do them anyway.
      There is one and only one reason they added post war jets and cold war era tanks - money.

  • @123TheCloop
    @123TheCloop Рік тому +121

    GR3 is a perfect example of "we only care for stats" literally other than a model variation this jet functions the same as the AV8C...... in both flares, missiles, rwr and flight performance yet the GR3 goes up while the AV8C stays at 9.7...... (and before people go on about GR3 carries more bombs, gaijin do not balance vehicles based on there ground capabilities, this was mentioned some time back) im not even sure gaijin at this point can hide how truly fucked "just looking at stats are" M48 situation alllllllllll over again with the GR3 and AV8C

    • @Jaeger_89
      @Jaeger_89 Рік тому

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but the AV8 maneuvers better than the GR3, doesn't it?

    • @Texas_Engineer_Mike
      @Texas_Engineer_Mike Рік тому +2

      @@Jaeger_89 nope, they have the same FM

    • @Texas_Engineer_Mike
      @Texas_Engineer_Mike Рік тому +7

      tbf AV-8A is even better than AV-8C because it carries 200+ flares meanwhile AV-8C can take only 64

    • @Jaeger_89
      @Jaeger_89 Рік тому

      @@Texas_Engineer_Mike I see. Always looked to me like the AV-8 was slightly more nimble. I'll unlock it pretty soon and will be able to compare both myself tho...

    • @Viper555
      @Viper555 Рік тому +7

      I think what this means is that I should start playing the GR.3 so I can drag the BR down next patch 😆

  • @jacobdoolan4978
    @jacobdoolan4978 Рік тому +34

    Flying the mig 19 is pain because of the all aspect missiles, but holy ****. Moving it down to 9.3 is bloody insane

    • @truta3715
      @truta3715 Рік тому

      why?

    • @jacobdoolan4978
      @jacobdoolan4978 Рік тому +3

      @@truta3715 it has the thrust of a top tier jet with a decent turn, insane energy retention, and 20 whatever the measurement for the guns are

    • @DeffinitlyNotFBI
      @DeffinitlyNotFBI Рік тому +3

      @@jacobdoolan4978 it's got the nuclear 30mm guns

    • @jacobdoolan4978
      @jacobdoolan4978 Рік тому

      @@DeffinitlyNotFBI Yeye burst mass is insane

    • @redacted5736
      @redacted5736 Рік тому

      yup the same reason the Su-7s dont get moved is because if you put them in the 8.0 bracket they would dominate like they used too before missiles became the norm for 9.0

  • @coleanderson8035
    @coleanderson8035 Рік тому +40

    I like how nobody even mentioned that all the r2y2s are going to 8.0
    And if you thought Britain 7.0 was basically nonexistent, the sea hawk is going to 8.0 now so the only things being at 7.7 is the meteor mk 4 (bad) and the sea venom (also bad)

    • @ofekk213
      @ofekk213 Рік тому

      and the Meteor NF Mk.13

    • @errorbyte7657
      @errorbyte7657 Рік тому

      @@ofekk213 that’s not britian

    • @ofekk213
      @ofekk213 Рік тому +2

      @@errorbyte7657 Oh I thought he said "And if you thought 7.0 was basically nonexistent"

    • @mekiyahhazbin1720
      @mekiyahhazbin1720 Рік тому +5

      P-39Q-5, one of the best props at its BR, was also moved down. Literal joke

    • @coleanderson8035
      @coleanderson8035 Рік тому +2

      @@ofekk213 I meant to say 7.7 is non existent but yes 7.0 is also non existent. Attacker gang is all that's left which is depressing

  • @RollingThunder911
    @RollingThunder911 Рік тому +38

    Yeah had this thought when they announced the T2 prem. Why would i buy an aircraft with Aim9-Es and no Flares at 9.7?! That sounds like a horrendously unfun experience in the current meta

    • @breckenhelsley4831
      @breckenhelsley4831 Рік тому

      Idk, I bought the MiG 21 S and it's been tons of fun. At least until the A 10 and Harrier swarm comes

    • @treycotter
      @treycotter Рік тому +2

      @@breckenhelsley4831 I play the mig21s and do well only because of its energy advantages. However if a good player actually tries to kill you and has all aspect missiles, you’re dead.

    • @axelkilander3079
      @axelkilander3079 Рік тому

      @@treycotter you have the speed to avoid a-10s. Only attack them from behind and you will be getting okay

    • @axelkilander3079
      @axelkilander3079 Рік тому

      @@treycotter I play a lot of a-10 and as long as you use your speed you will have it easier. If it’s 2v 1 your kinda dead tho

    • @treycotter
      @treycotter Рік тому +2

      @@axelkilander3079 Yes that’s why I said “because of its energy advantages”. The problem is sometimes I’ll be fighting somebody and won’t be able to escape before an a10 simply presses a button and I’m dead.

  • @pinthunters9961
    @pinthunters9961 Рік тому +13

    dude, they're not the only ones who only see money.
    one developer, expansive worlds, took it to the extreme. and although i played the game for many years over thousands of hours, the time came when i realized that the frustration exceeded the fun. as a consequence, i deleted the game. what a liberation that was. i can only recommend it to everyone. no matter how much time and money you invested, it's not worth sticking to such a game. that's the only language developers understand.

  • @Sevastous
    @Sevastous Рік тому +33

    Welcome to the annual Spit_Flyer balance patch rant video! Enjoy your popcorn and BR compression! See you next year!
    Also please 7.7 Su-11 PLS gaijin. You milked the damn thing for long enough

    • @Spitflyer
      @Spitflyer  Рік тому +3

      I reckon AT LEAST 7.3, but ideally 7.7. It’s kinda on par with the F-84G but also goes well 1 on 1 with the meteors

  • @phoenix-bv7bw
    @phoenix-bv7bw Рік тому +9

    A very good example that represents the phrase: “apathy is death”

  • @hungryhedgehog4201
    @hungryhedgehog4201 Рік тому +8

    Well gaijins point of view is: "if you are frutrated by the br why don't you buy the Su 11, sounds like a good deal then"

  • @gaijinmq-9when951
    @gaijinmq-9when951 Рік тому +11

    Literally
    F-89B/D
    Su-11
    Su-25 (both variants)
    A-5C
    Edit: the AV-8A/C too

    • @gelb_0139
      @gelb_0139 Рік тому

      The F-89s could go to 6.7 and i would still think its not a problem at all, most people dont know how to play it and its kinda like a free kill

    • @John.McMillan
      @John.McMillan Рік тому +1

      @@gelb_0139 No. Just no.
      I would never be able to play 5.7 just because I would have no way of actually countering a F89 that isn't trying to dog fight, it could so easily just keep going 200kph faster than anything else.

    • @gaijinmq-9when951
      @gaijinmq-9when951 Рік тому

      @@gelb_0139no no no no no no no no no no no no no
      THIS IS THE EXACT PROBLEM THE BR IS A MESS RIGHT NOW
      Gaijin uses statistics rather than an aircraft’s performance and it literally butchered wt’s br system especially AIR RB, one DAMN GOOD example of this is the XP-50, this thing not only can compete in 5.3, it can butcher the whole zero line, and even some later models of the 109’s, this thing has an ridiculous climb rate combined with an AIRSPAWN, and it can turn better too, and has better cannons but with lesser ammo.
      F-89 at 6.7 is the most, hands down, stupid decision people can make. Not only will It make 6.7 even worse, the whole damn br will be unplayable.
      0 iq american air rb pilots isn’t an excuse to drop the already undertiered F-89 (that can go up to 8.3 and still be fine and powerful). Also another problem with this is that planes like the P-51H and the F2G exists. Both have awesome climb rate (with the F2G having worse but still good) and outrun everything that isn’t a jet. I play the H Mustang myself i know how overpowered it is. The F-89 at 6.7 combined with the F2G and the H mustang will make the matchmaker go US vs US every match with the players not playing the US will just be useless.
      Edit: like seriously. F-89 at 6.7 will start a war thunder forum civil war with american mains trying to justify the br of the F-89 while the players that are actually sane will say they need to get help.

  • @Philliben1991
    @Philliben1991 Рік тому +4

    I keep getting battles against supersonic aircraft with modern missiles when I play Sabres!

  • @N4CR5
    @N4CR5 Рік тому +11

    PG-02 and SKR-7 and that Russian paper ship in naval are good examples of this.

    • @altair3232
      @altair3232 Рік тому

      and pr-7 in past, modern boat with automatic cannons vs wwi destroyers "MMMMM perfection"

    • @JohnSmith-tg9wc
      @JohnSmith-tg9wc Рік тому

      I'm convinced PG-02 owners only bought the vehicle BC they're shit at everything else and need a game mode where they can just club everyone with ease.

  • @izwoofletime4883
    @izwoofletime4883 Рік тому +1

    if you havent noticed, gaijin broke the swift f7's missiles to just veer off to any direction other than the one youre pointing at, has made its repair cost completely unreasonable, and now makes it face things with all aspect missiles with 30g overload, when it rips at >10gs. it used to be one of my favourite planes, and now its just become rubbish and i doubt anyone wants to play it, so it will stay at 8.7 with broken (not in a good way) missiles, and fight stupid missiles.

  • @Residentbrit281
    @Residentbrit281 Рік тому +6

    When he asked if you have seen a Lightning F6 I was like I love that plane but then realized I’m most likely the only player in all of war thunder that likes to play the English rocket. I have had to bear the brunt of the aim9L problem and I have just pushed through very painfully. It hurts my soul because the lightning is my favorite plane ever and gaijin just threw it in the trash. :(

    • @DiamondkeyOwO
      @DiamondkeyOwO Рік тому +1

      I bought the Saudi Lightning before even thinking about what kind of planes it faces because I just wanted the plane so much. What a mistake that was...

    • @meandthebois7565
      @meandthebois7565 Рік тому +1

      @@DiamondkeyOwO Supercruise goes zoom.

    • @DiamondkeyOwO
      @DiamondkeyOwO Рік тому +1

      @@meandthebois7565 is a fast boi yes

    • @gravygraves5112
      @gravygraves5112 Рік тому +1

      I feel this bud. I love flying the F-100, but oh boy can it get rough.

  • @hory121
    @hory121 Рік тому +2

    Playing 9.3 Sweden was the most frustrating experience I have ever had in the game. 95% of the games was uptiered into a10's and su25's playing a plane that handles like a brick and without flares. Not to mention the F5C.

  • @cutthroat795
    @cutthroat795 Рік тому +4

    Gaijin’s awful BR changes are up there with death and taxes

  • @Darkflame996
    @Darkflame996 Рік тому +2

    Honestly, an idea has been going around in my head, i just hope that gaijin makes sub-tree's divided by "era" so we have the WW2 theatre, the korean war theatre, the vietnam war theatre etc... and just make it so these planes can never meet each other.
    But as we know the purpose of these br changes in the first place is to make it impossible to grind without a premium, everyone wants to get into jets as soon as possible, and i can understand the people who just buy their way to the tomcat or the M2K (i got to the F4E without premium and the grind was insane). So we are kinda going around in circle's here, honestly i am just done with top tier air rb, its always the same music playing, i have had much more fun playing tanks and take out my top tiers only in sim (thank you SAS for allowing me to use mouse and keyboard)

  • @cakebomb4004
    @cakebomb4004 Рік тому +19

    What would you think about reducing the br range from 1.0 (3br steps) to 0.7 (2br steps)? My thought: it wouldnt be as good as decompression but still better than nothing.
    (Updated due to misunderstandings)

    • @moritzaufenanger2537
      @moritzaufenanger2537 Рік тому

      That uh,, sounds great but doesnt work.
      Imagine im a 10.0
      I could face 9.3-11.0
      But what if i am a 11.0?
      Then i could only face 10.3 to 11.3
      Which, if you read it again cancels each other out, because the first 10.0 facing 11.0s gives the 11.0 planes in that mach a full 1.0 downtier, not 0.7

    • @atomic4440
      @atomic4440 Рік тому +8

      @@moritzaufenanger2537 with a 0.7 max BR spread, you could only face 9.3-10.7 while playing a 10.0
      11.3s could only face 10.7s

    • @moritzaufenanger2537
      @moritzaufenanger2537 Рік тому +1

      @@atomic4440 Oh, im sorry, i read it as 1.0 up tier and 0.7 downtier.
      Makes more sense now :D

    • @cali2648
      @cali2648 Рік тому +5

      if you could only see .7 above and below that's way more decompression than adding 1 or 2 brs
      do not take this as me saying that its bad

    • @Jaeger_89
      @Jaeger_89 Рік тому

      Doesn't solve the whole problem, but it's definitely a step in the right direction.

  • @andrewmartin9948
    @andrewmartin9948 Рік тому +6

    I guess they're only thinking about the current matchmaker. Been playing a lot of mig 19S at 9.7 recently. Haven't seen one downtier in almost 30 games because of all the premiums at 10.3 and 10.0. Actual pain to try to grind out any modules as it's pretty much stock.

  • @Blacksmith__
    @Blacksmith__ Рік тому +1

    Decompression is good, but sounds like the best solution would be to make armaments factor into BR so planes like the A-10 go higher when they bring high performance missiles

  • @jambothejoyful2966
    @jambothejoyful2966 Рік тому +1

    Mig21spsk recently became insane because of the a10s audition of customizable load outs, you can now carry 2 r60s and a gun

  • @LevelSoldier-sy3my
    @LevelSoldier-sy3my Рік тому +1

    7:02 is why the Su-11 is still at 7.0

  • @tristacomand
    @tristacomand Рік тому +1

    At this point the only way to fix BR is to follow a simple method:
    Vehicle underperforming? Move everything else up.
    Vehicle performing average? Move it up.
    Vehicle overperforming? Move it up more.
    Basically the only way to decompress properly, we can't have a game where the M2A2 is at the same BR as a T-26, BT-5 or M8 LAC etc. Compression is that bad even at reserve tier.
    I bet that any "slow down" in the matchmaking would be immediately offset by players flocking back to the game after one of the MAJOR ISSUES is fixed.

  • @AsthmaQueen
    @AsthmaQueen Рік тому +1

    B-I was a good example of a plane with low player counter, bad stats since it didn't have enough fuel to matter in where they take the statistics, but then it absolutely dominates anywhere from 6.3 to 8.0 in SQB (when it was originally 6.3) It still has performance matching mid 8.0 jets or greater, and SQB's are short distance and extremely decisive victories where plane excels at.

  • @TheSpartacusTV
    @TheSpartacusTV Рік тому +26

    I might say a bs but I think they'd need to make the range of the BR way wider, so that many type of jets end up only against those of the same caliber, at least we will finally stop to see supersonics with R60s against subsonics with no flares. I think if they didn't have only 11.3 as highest BR but idk, something like 20, there would be a bigger variety??? As I said, mine could be a bad idea but I think this could solve somehow the very small range of BR and will solve the problem of subsonics against supersonics? Idk if this will affect the time of joining a match though

    • @ofekk213
      @ofekk213 Рік тому +13

      "Guys I'm about to say a controvertial and unpopular opinion"
      **Says the most agreed upon and popular opinion**
      EVERYONE wants decompression. Everyone except Gaijin for some reason.

    • @TheSpartacusTV
      @TheSpartacusTV Рік тому +3

      @@ofekk213 Bruh, that's just my ignorance on the subject brother😔

    • @TheEpicGamingChair.
      @TheEpicGamingChair. Рік тому +1

      @@TheSpartacusTV 20 is a tad too much for now
      Perhaps 13-15 would be better and would deal with queue times better? For now at the very least

    • @meandthebois7565
      @meandthebois7565 Рік тому +3

      @@ofekk213 Incorrect, people who abuse OP premiums don't want BR decompression.

  • @tictaculer
    @tictaculer Рік тому +7

    It seems funny how quickly the gr7 has been moved up in br

    • @_YellovvJacket_
      @_YellovvJacket_ Рік тому +15

      Not that 11.0 and 11.3 makes any difference at all.

    • @tictaculer
      @tictaculer Рік тому +5

      @@_YellovvJacket_ ground RB as if you play 11.0 you can get down tiers outside of the 11.3 cas planes which other nations use

    • @mikewizz1895
      @mikewizz1895 Рік тому

      it'll still slap

    • @tictaculer
      @tictaculer Рік тому

      @@mikewizz1895 I know but more for the line up

    • @Spitflyer
      @Spitflyer  Рік тому +1

      Britain suffers (proof)

  • @TheSuperZOS
    @TheSuperZOS Рік тому +2

    Gaijin: makes jets even more unbearable to play
    My honest reaction to this information:

  • @StealthySpace7
    @StealthySpace7 Рік тому +1

    Milan is 9.7
    It faces A-10's with all aspect 30G missiles
    It faces Su-25's with all aspect 30G missiles
    It faces Harrier's with good long range 18G missiles
    The Milan has no flares, is ground spawned, and gets 2 AIM-9B's. It's an attacker variant of a Mirage, it cannot turn for S**T under 450 knots.
    Also the Mirage III is at 10.3 and regularly sees 11.3 yet also has no flares

  • @blueflames6961
    @blueflames6961 Рік тому +2

    The broken premiums have a cascading effect that compresses the battle ratings below them. The simple fix would be to just move them higher in BR, but that would mean fewer sales and therefore less profit.

  • @taxfraud853
    @taxfraud853 Рік тому +13

    Bruh playing the game is proof

    • @taxfraud853
      @taxfraud853 Рік тому +2

      If there was a game anything like warthunder I would play that instead

    • @Cheesycat0
      @Cheesycat0 Рік тому

      @@taxfraud853 il2/dcs

  • @arthurkaribyan6546
    @arthurkaribyan6546 Рік тому

    This is the first vid I've ever seen from you and i genuinely thought u have at least a million subs ur content is great ur arguments are valid keep it up love to see people like u here

    • @Spitflyer
      @Spitflyer  Рік тому

      Thanks mate that means a lot to me :)

  • @shoeby9273
    @shoeby9273 Рік тому +1

    Would much prefer struggling against something that is better within my era than fighting something 20 years ahead.

  • @G91YS
    @G91YS Рік тому +2

    Every 6 months I go back in BR a little bit. I can't play my G.91 YS (or Y) anymore, can't play my J29F or D anymore. Now I'm playing my MiG-15Bis ISH at 8.3. I wish I could sell my Mirage 2000, FGR2, all my 9.3+ planes.

  • @Your_Resident_Redleg
    @Your_Resident_Redleg Рік тому +2

    Half the problem with the br system is how restrictive it is. Instead of 1.0, 1.3, 1.7, and 2.0, meaning a total of 3 slots per number, instead it should be 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0 and that gives 5 slots per number. Would be way more open and give a lot more options for balance. Maus should have never been removed. It just shouldn’t have to deal with such a terrible system.

  • @mikebauer6917
    @mikebauer6917 Рік тому

    “Decompression is a sickness”, Gaijin probably.

  • @13deadghosts
    @13deadghosts Рік тому +1

    Can't wait to fight F-104A's in a Me 163. Such balans, much wow.
    Also, the Ta 152 C-3 move, lol. As long as the Su-11 and F-89 stay at 7.0, gajin proves that they have no clue what they are doing. Besides huffing glue and eating crayons of course.

  • @Sinister1030
    @Sinister1030 Рік тому

    Lord I’m feeling this problem in my F1 no flairs and AIM9Ps vs things that have flairs and AIM9Ls

  • @warning6465
    @warning6465 Рік тому

    I was having so much fun the other day playing at a 3.0 battle rating against 4.7 battle rating planes.

  • @ohlala5681
    @ohlala5681 Рік тому +7

    I agree with your points, I also feel like im kinda burned out of playing Air RB... mixed team deathmatch all day long are boring. Id love to see new game modes... like a mode without markers and guns only? idk but they could do so many things...

    • @TheSpartacusTV
      @TheSpartacusTV Рік тому +6

      BROOO, an all gun game mode would be so damn fun actually, especially for dogfights 🤲

    • @kwilliams3161
      @kwilliams3161 Рік тому +1

      The mode is called simulator battles lol .

    • @fenriders7008
      @fenriders7008 Рік тому +6

      @@kwilliams3161 if they could make a halfway house between sim and air rb that would be great. Bigger maps and more objectives from sim, no markers etc.
      Basically sim with 3rd person view and ability to use mouse flight (maybe disable instructor for everyone that usually leaves it on on RB) and a lower reward would be my ideal.
      Maybe even the sim spawning system rather than the one and done of air RB.
      It would give bomber players something more engaging to do and would actually make people use radar etc for acquiring targets rather than “oh a guy on my team is within 5km of an enemy I’m 30km away from, of course I should have real time positional info on the guy”.

    • @ohlala5681
      @ohlala5681 Рік тому

      @J Wilt holy shit what happened after? nobody played it?

  • @SomeOrdinaryJanitor
    @SomeOrdinaryJanitor Рік тому +1

    im on a quest to fully spade all the tech trees, and i've come quite far. however in recent years i've made an annotation to that, only the original tech trees (only props and early rank Vs) for this reason. i have up to 10.3/10.7 but those vehicles are almost stock i've neglected them that much

  • @ev17dan
    @ev17dan Рік тому

    I for one love eating an all aspect to the face in my MiG 19PT or, unable to maneuver out of the way of any missiles because, you know, no flairs

  • @pipluml1458
    @pipluml1458 Рік тому +1

    I feel the same about the a10 and su25. The Israeli Mirage was my of my favorite planes until they added the Su25 and buffed the 9Ls. Now it’s basically unplayable. You can maybe get 1 kill with the radar missile then die to r60m that you can’t even dodge

  • @Shimo_28
    @Shimo_28 Рік тому +2

    They know exactly what they're doing, they're just playing dumb

  • @planetfun85
    @planetfun85 Рік тому

    Yep, wat thinder has a wide variety of planes to group them. Mig15 17 with sabres, spits with fw and bf. Hariers ws yaks and jaguars etc.

  • @spookwagen-thegreat1350
    @spookwagen-thegreat1350 Рік тому +2

    On the F-104 BR change, i'm not sure if Gaijin disabled this but there was a hard cap to the BR, you could not get a downtier and I think the same still applies except with the cap at 9.7 now since I only ever see 9.7s and above

    • @DeffinitlyNotFBI
      @DeffinitlyNotFBI Рік тому

      You should try playing 8.7 against and with full 9.7 Teams

  • @tsugumorihoney2288
    @tsugumorihoney2288 Рік тому

    the main problem that military vehicles made to counter opponent one. So it made that almost every new vehicle is better than opponent's one, it is just impossible to balance in game like WT

  • @thomashanson6603
    @thomashanson6603 Рік тому

    Pretty soon we'll see spitfire mk24 vs supersonics. I would not even be surprised.

  • @-Hari-03
    @-Hari-03 Рік тому

    the problem with moving things down is there is always a fixed floor of 1.0. if you move ANYTHING down it will compress everything below it, but if you move things up then the ceiling can go up forever really, just add more BR levels.

  • @therightmind7466
    @therightmind7466 Рік тому

    Me: *Sees title of video*
    Also me: "Who doesn't already know they don't know how to balance? lol"

  • @Craig-xw9jq
    @Craig-xw9jq Рік тому +1

    Good to see a UA-camr with a 200+ping - subscribed :) Now do Realistic tanks and how ping makes a difference :) On this - the BR system is fundamentally broken - BR's are now only there to fit premiums in.

  • @Yuki_Ika7
    @Yuki_Ika7 Рік тому +2

    I love flying planes in this game but their mismanagement of the br system makes me play less, i typically stick to low to mid brs and i fly bombers offensively (as in like gunships)

  • @vizender
    @vizender Рік тому

    In the few games I played the M2000 in downtiers, it’s so stupidly overpowered no one can do anything to it before I get 4 kills with my missiles.
    And I can’t even imagine a f14 in a downriver shooting down everyone in one go with its Aim57

  • @John.McMillan
    @John.McMillan Рік тому +2

    Anyone remember when Helicopters and Modern tanks were first shown off in a (if I remember correctly) april fools event? Everything went to 12.0-14.0. That was perfect. Put the modern bs more than a fee BRs ahead of things from the 50's and 60's.
    Gaijin already had it figured out, they just don't care to fix it. Current horrible battle ratings is how so many premiums are sold. Same with Gaijin constantly lowering rewards, it's how they sell premium time and vehicles.

  • @matchesburn
    @matchesburn Рік тому +1

    Honestly, even if I had a Gaijin/War Thunder "press" account with literally every vehicle unlocked with all modifications unlocked... I would just never play at any BR where jets are common. It's just not fun. I constantly go back to lower BRs *_because it's actually fun to play at those tiers._*

  • @INSANESUICIDE
    @INSANESUICIDE Рік тому +2

    One of the reasons I started playing WT back in the day with planes only was that ever since I saw the Me262 in a history book as a kid I thought they looked amazing and that it seemed to be a hell of a time to use a jet vs props, boy was I to be disappointed, I just have up on the ww2 jets of Germany as every single match was an uptier. It facing the Korean War jets is just ridiculous as well, I ended up being the prop from the scenario I had envisioned.
    Got Ju288 and bombed my way through to the migs, currently on my third mig and still no missiles or flares, meanwhile most of what I face does get one or the other. It is just ridiculous how poorly balanced the BR system is as certain nations are borderline useless in some BRs and modes. Is it intentional to force players to buy premium or p2w vehicles i wonder?

  • @sethbarber8559
    @sethbarber8559 Рік тому +3

    Dude you makes soo many good points that I wish Gajiin would listen to. But again it because of their stupid prems like the su25 and A10 that I can’t enjoy some of my planes. The J35d feels so unplayable because it either faces sarh or all aspects 😭

  • @spookaychoco2860
    @spookaychoco2860 Рік тому

    Cries in 9.3 saber

  • @robgraham5697
    @robgraham5697 Рік тому +1

    I always wondered about WT's battle ratings. It just seemed to me it would lead to what I call 'lumpy distribution'. Which means things get lumped together that shouldn't be.
    I also wonder if BRs should be based on armament. A plane has a basic BR that is raised depending on what guns, ordinance, or missiles it equips.
    Just some thoughts.

  • @wafflesheep2087
    @wafflesheep2087 Рік тому

    I remember playing the F104A when it was introduced at 9.7... It was so stupid overpowered

  • @mtunit
    @mtunit Рік тому +4

    WT, a slot machine that never pays off . (WT , a threat to your mental health .)

  • @damocles8159
    @damocles8159 Рік тому +13

    I also liked the idea of bringing the 152C3 to 6.3 it certainly performs as well as a P51h and is better than an f2g or its H variant for that matter. (/cynism end)

    • @Jaeger_89
      @Jaeger_89 Рік тому +4

      I have zero clue as to why they did that with the C3. Maybe it sucks so bad as a prop, it might as well face early jets. It certainly turns as bad as some of them...

    • @alterego2421
      @alterego2421 Рік тому +1

      they said germany suffers now whatch this

  • @Gurowho
    @Gurowho Рік тому +1

    The problem is fixing around the BR system when they can rework the whole god damn thing, I would say a good Improvement is switching the .3 and .7 ratings and making them .2 .4 .6 .8 making the whole thing compressed and not simply moving the BRs higher,

  • @nomcarver4436
    @nomcarver4436 Рік тому +3

    Thank you for talking about 6.0 hell. I wish I could use my f2g1 but all I can do is fight ai planes which does get me a lot of money but the point still stands.

    • @maccarr9923
      @maccarr9923 Рік тому

      I try to take my Hornet out to deal with 288 herds lol and half the time it matchmakes me ONTO the German team

    • @altair3232
      @altair3232 Рік тому

      At least ki-87 is useful ._. (cries in agony) 5.7, can't go f ing 450km'h at 1000m, but 5.7....................
      And that climb rate
      -guys, do you have towing rope? i think i'm stalling ,_,
      Climb rate comparable to 4.3 planes. Turn rate like heavy fighter, energy disappears the second you get it. If not that 30mm i bet someone would sue Gajin for scam on 6k GE. Also, it is a bomber interceptor by design, yet ofc its fighter in game, no air spawn, but ta154 (i meant 152, but 154 also beats you in nearly anything apart from tie on turn rate :| how nice...) can have air spawn, why not, ofc, it should have it, by design, its also bomber interceptor BUT damn, performance wise it beats you in everything, speed, turn, climb, handling, energy retention and we have tie on guns ._.
      So ye, ki-87, if not that ju288 spam, that thing would be absolutely screwed.
      On the other hand, let me bitch about german line up, when you have 4 or more (i swear i seen 6), trash ju288 and have fight 1v3 ratio against usa with crap like p51h or super corsair that by some mistake is 6.0 "i wonder how, i wonder why~", oh, right, it's premium.
      It's hell, good that low tier II III and low looow IV is mostly ok, sigh.

  • @wilkosgaming9224
    @wilkosgaming9224 Рік тому +1

    Yea, the amount of times I've been killed by a skilless A10 is just... unreal

  • @caioaugusto6819
    @caioaugusto6819 Рік тому

    I quit playing right before the nuclear update because it already went downhill since the launch of supersonic. Got back because a friend of mine was playing as well only to find that not only did they messed up the matchmaking even more, they also managed to make EVERY ASPECT of progression in the game horrible.

  • @StealthySpace7
    @StealthySpace7 Рік тому +1

    Here's a suggestion, maximum 0.7 uptier and down tier instead of 1.0
    We have enough players and vehicles now

  • @jonathonspears7736
    @jonathonspears7736 Рік тому

    Even Gaijin knew back when they had the modern warfare April fools event that the T-90 and Leo2a6 should be what was it 13.0?

  • @autumnrah
    @autumnrah Рік тому

    Always had a feeling that the A-10 and Su-25 would drag some planes down

  • @SaintedPIacebo
    @SaintedPIacebo Рік тому

    The way WOT used to do it when i played it on console years ago was that premiums had 'favorable match making' and so they could only face at most a half uptier. This made the vehicles more favorable to play for players to want to buy but also did not make it so that they were overpowered against their equally rated peers, just that you had no way of being at the same disadvantage gap via a full uptier. Granted had they stuck to only that they would have been fine but they also sold magical premium ammo that had extra pen/damage and that ruined the game for me personally. But as far as buying premium vehicles there are plenty that were really worth the money just to be able to hop into knowing after a string of bad luck uptiers. It would also help gaijin sell and balance vehicles like the Maus had they used this system before and released it as a premium. Its a vehicle that suffers too much against uptiered modern rounds and tanks, and is strong in a full down tier. Favorable MM would allow the tank to have a niche where it is better more often to entice people to use and purchase it (if it was a premium). There are a ton of vehicles that are too weak in uptiers, or too strong in full down tiers but that would be the other half of the problem.

  • @splayeye0152
    @splayeye0152 Рік тому

    Wonder if be decompression could be fixed if they make BR’s like 1.0-1.1-1.2 etc up to 10.0 then make be spread as .3 or .5, been giving it some thought and it’d be a rough start but could turn into something nice. Hell implement this new br’s but keep all current BR’s then raise or lower them accordingly

  • @corsair5810
    @corsair5810 Рік тому +1

    I know this may sound stupid but I think that planes should be put into time zones so the same planes from the same time should be in the same braket. For example the A 10 should be up at top teir. Probably dumb idea but yea

    • @lukewhitehouse4103
      @lukewhitehouse4103 Рік тому

      No its not exactly what should be happening, level jets and tanks on technology not hard stats, if it has the firepower to level a city the countermeasures avionics to protect itself, ballistic computers, CCIP and the best air to air missiles it probably should be top tier...But nope, because Gaijin only balances aircraft on the speed and missiles/cannons. As the A-10 is slow it gets a joke BR.

  • @janomomo153
    @janomomo153 Рік тому

    I just took a look at the changes when i saw this video, and i can confidently say that my eyebrows were raised all the way through reading them

  • @Mamiya645
    @Mamiya645 Рік тому +1

    Spit_flyer videos be like reminders of why you uninstalled and live a significantly happier more rewarding life.
    F-14 life looks like what I'd expect from JA37C if it got a six 9L/Rb74 loadout which is EASYMODE, because those missiles function on my system, while 9J focuses on teamkilling and skyflash and radar don't at all work.

  • @MrPoPo-ct6se
    @MrPoPo-ct6se Рік тому

    I miss when top tier was the f-2 Sabre, cl13, hunter,mig 17 and mig 15 BIS

  • @a.j.gallegos2191
    @a.j.gallegos2191 Рік тому

    Yeah bro we need help thank you for voicing our concernes.

  • @sndrc9
    @sndrc9 Рік тому

    Su-17M2: 11.0
    Su-22M3: 11.0
    Su-22UM3K: 11.0
    Su-17M4: 11.0
    Gaijin: balans

  • @LongTimeAgoNL
    @LongTimeAgoNL Рік тому +1

    They need to start making you only fight BR's 0,3 higher or lower than your own. Thats it.

  • @falkeholz1459
    @falkeholz1459 Рік тому

    I can’t stand how the harrier gr3 is going to 10.0 and the av8 isn’t, like they sat literally the same jet

  • @HeavyTanker-vx4oq
    @HeavyTanker-vx4oq Рік тому

    Oh i cant wait to fight MIG-19s in my Swift F.1. Especially with its currently broken fight model that cant go past 4gs in a turn.

  • @toniodu371200
    @toniodu371200 Рік тому

    Me : Do you know what balance and matchmaking is supposed to be ?
    Gaijin : I know balance.... We don't do that here.... and I have no clue what is macht something

  • @metaphysicalretardation
    @metaphysicalretardation Рік тому +1

    The problem with premiums is that if they're not overpowered, then they won't sell well. And if you make them overpowered (like Gaijin does), you sell a lot but you can't fix them later without risking a lawsuit.
    Wargaming made that mistake a long time ago and they learned their lesson.

  • @iancarpenter5488
    @iancarpenter5488 Рік тому

    I love playing the F86. But man it is painful with the missiles. I started sending chats to the opposing team asking them no to missile kill me. guns fine. But I literally have no way to counter those missiles and everyone knows it. I noticed a serious drop in the number of times I was taken out by missiles immediately. Such bullshit that I have to beg for mercy from the other team to make playing one of my favorite planes kind of fun.

  • @stvka
    @stvka Рік тому

    Hey spit i havent watched you in over a year and i come back and you are correct about sounding like a broken record about BR, also can you do a video on the Hunter FGA 9 in its current state

  • @ccramit
    @ccramit Рік тому

    Even the lower BR's are broken. I mean, a perfect example is your video on the American Ki-61. Sitting at 3.7 but just clubs most of the planes around it's BR. I'm terrible at Air RB and even I am able to get an Ace in that plane.

  • @AndrewH9999
    @AndrewH9999 Рік тому +2

    "I think they only care about money" no shit they have their own currency on their website 🤣🤣💀💀

  • @drierwhisper729
    @drierwhisper729 Рік тому +2

    if only gaijin had a team of folks who watched some of the content creator's videos, warthunder would be so much better.

  • @dazcookiez3714
    @dazcookiez3714 Рік тому

    maybe bring back those BR barriers. remember 9.7-10.0 barrier? when the lightning at 9.7 was quite OP, along with the mig19 or whatever 9.7s were at that time. then 10.0 fought with up to 10.3 or 10.7 iirc. now do it again at 9.0, 10.0, and 11.0. PERFECT.

  • @chroniclerorsini3601
    @chroniclerorsini3601 Рік тому +1

    It would be great if the Snail used developers to design their battle ratings, but for the most part, its just metrics and algorithms. Sure they are ignoring the Su-25K, on purpose as you have said, but the automated changes are the far more common ones we see that seemingly don't make sense.

  • @LithuanianBadger
    @LithuanianBadger Рік тому +1

    They should add BR skip like 7.0-9.0 planes dont have missiles and then straight to 11.0-12.0 planes with out any countermeasure should not fight super sonic planes with top AAM

  • @Real_Claudy_Focan
    @Real_Claudy_Focan Рік тому +1

    F104vsF86 problem is what i call the "BiplanvsJet" problem..
    In the end 104 will struggle as much to kill the 86 as he struggles to kill the 104
    "I cant kill you but you neither"
    And this is where teamplay will prevail.. or not to take them out when they over-commit on you and set themselves vulnerable

    • @theborg6024
      @theborg6024 Рік тому +1

      the entire issue in these situations is that the f86/"biplane" is stuck praying the f104/"jet" is brain damaged and will throw the fight, if they have any shred of mental capacity they might not be able to kill you, but youre definitely never gonna be able to threaten them in any way, shape, or form

    • @lukewhitehouse4103
      @lukewhitehouse4103 Рік тому

      No it wont the F-104 can just energy trap the F-86, the F-86 can turn and dodge but the F-104 will win easily if they are competent. Likely though the F-86 will die when they are dogfighting a G.91 or MiG 17 and don't expect an F-104 to come screaming out the clouds at near Mach 1.5 and vaporised in a hail of Vulcan

  • @lacadora1
    @lacadora1 Рік тому

    Welp looks like the perfect time to grind the Mig-19

  • @josephbascetta2338
    @josephbascetta2338 Рік тому

    can someone link me the battle ratings change? I cant find it.

  • @Raptor_Dandi
    @Raptor_Dandi Рік тому

    In just my honest opinion, I think a good idea would be to not only look at the BRs and Ranks, But also the year that each Aircraft was introduced and having that kind of approach to it. The F-86 is a very good example from personal experience. Most of the time, im put up against everything that has some kind of missiles and it unfortunately it leads to an issue where its just not fun anymore. so i try to see if i can move up or down in the ranking system to try and feel like i can do something, but its never the case

    • @LewisB3217
      @LewisB3217 Рік тому

      If only lol, F4C 1950+ 😅

  • @MasaMasater
    @MasaMasater Рік тому

    I used to love that 9.7-10.3 br, it was my favorite matchmaking range in the game because of the not super overpowered planes and how it was faster paced gameplay without the top tier missiles and strats. but gaijin had to introduce like 5 fucking prems with 30+ G missiles with a ton of flares to fight the stuff that was just getting flares and starting to have missiles going over 15-20 G. Gaijin had a great game but needs to fucking balance it before that place becomes even more of a premium playground like 6.0/.3.

  • @roebuckpayne
    @roebuckpayne Рік тому

    Another problem war thunder can't seem to grasp is that they NEED gaps in their BR rating so that planes WITHOUT a certain capability like flares for example, never have to get clubbed by things WITH flares. If BR suddenly stopped at 8.7 then picked back up at 10.0 then you could effectively separate battles into tiers and spread the planes out more effectively. You could have all the subsonic jets never fighting supersonic jets, all jets with missiles but no flares fighting other jets with missiles but no flares. They just need to remove the BR bridges and spread almost everything out and completely separate them all by capability, but they're too obsessed with que times.