Justice Thomas Ignores Basic Ethics Where Wife's Activism, Lobbying Conflict With Cases

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,6 тис.

  • @SN-sz7kw
    @SN-sz7kw 2 роки тому +156

    Finally. A loud public discussion of this couple is LONG overdue. Please keep it up.

  • @mustafaa965
    @mustafaa965 2 роки тому +330

    Ginni Thomas should 'cease and desist' or Clarence Thomas should resign. He should not be a Supreme Court Justice. Too many conflicts of interest.

    • @captaind6178
      @captaind6178 2 роки тому +10

      I'd suggest more than just "resignation" from Clarence Thomas. Impeachment, and then disbarment.

    • @spir5102
      @spir5102 2 роки тому +8

      Well, Trump has gotten away with all his crimes so far, so why should Clarence Thomas care about the law?

    • @mustafaa965
      @mustafaa965 2 роки тому +3

      @@spir5102 I agree, 100%.

    • @mustafaa965
      @mustafaa965 2 роки тому

      @@captaind6178 Neither will ever happen.

  • @LoveMyRottweiler1
    @LoveMyRottweiler1 2 роки тому +788

    Add Clarence & Virginia (Ginni) Thomas to the list: List of Donald Trump’s Co-Conspirators; Melania Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, Eric Trump, Gregg Abbott, Steve Bannon, Bill Barr, Tom Barrack, Andy Bibbs, Lauren Boebert, Mo Brooks, Madison Cawthorn, Tucker Carlson, Matthew Calamari, Andrew Clyde, Jeffery Clark, Chris Collins, Kellyanne Conway, Ted Cruz, Louis DeJoy, Ron DeSantis, John Eastman, Jenna Ellis, Boris Epshteyn, Michael Flynn, Matt Gaetz, Rudy Giuliani, Paul Gosar, Louie Gohmert, Lindsey Graham, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ric Grenell, Kimberly Guilfoyle, Sean Hannity, Josh Hawley, Hope Hicks, Thomas Homan, Duncan Hunter, Cassidy Hutchinson, Jim Jordan, Ron Johnson, Alex Jones, Bernard Kerik, Kenneth Klukowski, Keith Kellogg, Jared Kushner, Mike Lindell, Nick Luna, Christopher Liddell, Roger Marshall, Angela McCallum, Kayleigh McEnany, Kevin McCarthy, Paul Manafort, Chris Miller, Jason Miller, Stephan Miller, Molly Micheal, Johnny McEntee, Mark Meadows, Heather Nauret, Peter Navarro, Devin Nunes, Kashyap Patel, Janine Perro, Scott Perry, Rick Perry, Ken Paxton, Rand Paul, Mike Pompeo, Vladimir Putin, Sidney Powell, Mitt Romney, Dan Scavino, William Stepien, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Sean Spicer, Roger Stone, Bill Shine, Clarence Thomas and Virginia Ginni Thomas, Cyrus Vance Jr., Ben Williamson, Allen Weisselberg,…Just to name a few.

    • @rondanew9916
      @rondanew9916 2 роки тому +47

      Just to name a few. There's so many I'm sure you miss some of them but you got most of them.

    • @flowerchild3686
      @flowerchild3686 2 роки тому +9

      They were already in your list. I gave them to you 2 weeks ago.

    • @flowerchild3686
      @flowerchild3686 2 роки тому +21

      You forgot Chad Wolf!

    • @LoveMyRottweiler1
      @LoveMyRottweiler1 2 роки тому +17

      @@flowerchild3686 Agree need to add Chad...thanks.

    • @greenhometony
      @greenhometony 2 роки тому +9

      Just curious, why Cyrus Vance Jr???

  • @jamiemiller7316
    @jamiemiller7316 2 роки тому +121

    His wife has been a source of conflict of interest for a long time. I find it disturbing that this is really the first time Clarence's unfitness to be a supreme court justice has been properly brought up on mainstream media. I hope this issue doesn't disappear.

    • @rowlandlarkham3206
      @rowlandlarkham3206 2 роки тому +1

      Sounds like this Judge is P""""y whipped - "You don't vote the way I want, you won't get none for a YEAR"

    • @windycityliz7711
      @windycityliz7711 2 роки тому +2

      His fitness for the court has been covered by the media several times, notably when he was appointed by Bush I. The Judiciary Committee forwarded his name to the Senate without a recommendation for approval and he received a 48% no vote, shocking at the time, based on his fitness for the bench.

    • @lakshmicostello900
      @lakshmicostello900 2 роки тому +1

      @@windycityliz7711 I lived in CA at the time and the protest of Thomas’ appointment to SCOTUS was the first protest that I had ever been a part of. Boy were we right.

    • @sylviewalker7560
      @sylviewalker7560 2 роки тому

      It was all on display, very public display, confirmation hearings with Miss Anita Hill, when he was originally being vetted.

    • @guerrahp5180
      @guerrahp5180 2 роки тому +2

      I believe this us more Clarence Thomas' problem because he is not disclosing his spouses connection to the cases before him. She can do whatever she wants whether it be patriotic or treasonous activities...he in the other hand be upfront how close the matters are to his family or orbit of influence that comes before his courtroom.

  • @curiouscat3384
    @curiouscat3384 2 роки тому +30

    God bless Jane Mayer. She's the best, most thorough, most insightful investigative reporter out there.

  • @charley408
    @charley408 2 роки тому +214

    Okay listen, these judges must be held to the highest standard and way too much has been allowed to happen. Thomas, and a couple others must be removed.

  • @johnwright9372
    @johnwright9372 2 роки тому +779

    He knows very well what a conflict of interest is. He is just dishonest.

    • @earlmorton6265
      @earlmorton6265 2 роки тому +23

      He definitely remembers that Coke can.
      So does Ginni.

    • @swisskiwi1478
      @swisskiwi1478 2 роки тому +30

      Corrupt Clarence should never ever have been allowed to become a SCOTUS judge!!!

    • @eduraocastro4848
      @eduraocastro4848 2 роки тому +9

      He is a slave.

    • @jimmcdonald3801
      @jimmcdonald3801 2 роки тому +15

      Doesn't care as long as money flows in regardless of the source. How much blood and dark money have been earned by this.

    • @Scarletspeedster68
      @Scarletspeedster68 2 роки тому +18

      Brother, he's been dishonest ever since he was appointed to the court 30 years ago.

  • @tomsdotter3228
    @tomsdotter3228 2 роки тому +281

    Yes, he should have recused himself. Why didn't Chief Justice Roberts see that he did?! Ginni should be investigated for possible 1/6 involvement.

    • @janet6348
      @janet6348 2 роки тому +8

      no "possible" about it. She paid for buses to take them there!

    • @windycityliz7711
      @windycityliz7711 2 роки тому +4

      @@janet6348 Fact checkers point out there is zero evidence Mrs. Thomas was involved with funding for bussing for insurrectionists. And, given her public activities, it would have been best for SCOTUS has Thomas recused himself. We do not know whether Roberts pressured him to do so.

    • @michelangelobuonarroti916
      @michelangelobuonarroti916 2 роки тому +6

      I hope the committee subpoenas her.

    • @janet6348
      @janet6348 2 роки тому

      @@windycityliz7711 thank you. I didnt realize that.

    • @windycityliz7711
      @windycityliz7711 2 роки тому

      @@janet6348 Please understand I'm not defending her. She's done plenty - just not this.

  • @janine7509
    @janine7509 2 роки тому +17

    This is literally the definition of corruption.

  • @pjoffrion
    @pjoffrion 2 роки тому +14

    Please keep reporting on this. It's insane. He makes so many decisions that seem overwhelmingly based on conservative politics and not precedent.

  • @studivan
    @studivan 2 роки тому +97

    This is conflict of interest at the highest level.

  • @jacknerdlord3244
    @jacknerdlord3244 2 роки тому +822

    Thomas has just about always been on the wrong side of history.

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 2 роки тому +29

      That's why he was selected for the court

    • @peggystoutemorin4529
      @peggystoutemorin4529 2 роки тому +50

      That 💩stain would have derailed the underground railroad single handedly. I despise the man! He is without morals.

    • @sarahjones3338
      @sarahjones3338 2 роки тому +1

      According to YOU, lol !!

    • @kittyday1402
      @kittyday1402 2 роки тому +17

      @@sarahjones3338 I remember when he asked Anita Hill, "Is that YOUR PUBIC HAIR on my Coke can?"
      NICE GUY.

    • @jrowdygi1837
      @jrowdygi1837 2 роки тому +1

      Oh the humanity.

  • @mcporter03
    @mcporter03 2 роки тому +263

    Is she really untouchable? Could the AG investigate her?

    • @richardmckinney4963
      @richardmckinney4963 2 роки тому +49

      Well let's start with the IRS seeing how she is using her 501c for political reason which is a big no-no according to tax codes.

    • @dougstubbs9637
      @dougstubbs9637 2 роки тому +54

      Probably happening already. She maybe thinks she is untouchable because of Clarrie.
      “ DO YOU KNOW WHO MY HUSBAND IS ????? I WANT TO SPEAK WIYH YOUR CHEIF JUSTICE !!!”
      No, Karen.

    • @polly8130
      @polly8130 2 роки тому +9

      A good question.

    • @nomore6167
      @nomore6167 2 роки тому +17

      "Could the AG investigate her?" - Sure he COULD, but we can safely assume he won't. Despite his words, Garland doesn't seem to care about the interests (or safety) of the United States or its law-abiding citizens.

    • @jasonflorence127
      @jasonflorence127 2 роки тому +5

      @@nomore6167 true. He doesn’t seem interested in prosecuting anybody, he actually seems to protect trump and his lackies as well as Biden. I hope somebody else runs 2024 for democrats because Biden ain’t it..better than trump but still not it..

  • @debrajohnson8030
    @debrajohnson8030 2 роки тому +8

    She's interfering in the decisions of the Laws of the Supreme Court and it should be illegal what she is doing.

  • @ryanmathison3608
    @ryanmathison3608 2 роки тому +11

    When I first heard the news that SCOTUS had ruled that the National Archives must release the documents and the decision was 8-1, before I had any further details, I said to myself: “I bet the one holdout was Clarence Thomas.”

    • @marywallace4086
      @marywallace4086 2 роки тому +2

      Ryan Mathison, me too!

    • @ryanmathison3608
      @ryanmathison3608 2 роки тому +2

      @@marywallace4086 Justice Thomas is a contradiction in of itself.

  • @1drummer172
    @1drummer172 2 роки тому +149

    Thomas should have been confronted about this publicly years ago! Why is this just coming out now?!!!

    • @bobg.3206
      @bobg.3206 2 роки тому

      Because it is a nonissue. If it was a real problem, he has served under multiple Chief Justices who would have brought it to his attention. None of them has. More than that, the activist members of the Court have not made an issue of it. Just because he is on the Court, her free speech should be limited? That's a rather leftist point of view, the male wants something so the female needs to sit down, shut up, and deal with it...quietly.
      The Biden /Harris administration is a cluster, failing at every turn. What can they do to get us to look the other direction? Let's bring up something that has been going on openly for decades and see if we can't get everybody mad about nothing. And it is working.

    • @bobbiezaborsky9647
      @bobbiezaborsky9647 2 роки тому +8

      @@bobg.3206 Your delusional and should seek help immediately!

    • @bobg.3206
      @bobg.3206 2 роки тому

      @@bobbiezaborsky9647, what about my comments is delusional?

    • @marywallace4086
      @marywallace4086 2 роки тому +2

      @@bobg.3206
      Troll farm graduate? Very obvious.

    • @marywallace4086
      @marywallace4086 2 роки тому +4

      @@bobg.3206
      I'm not Bobbie but here goes: Dump is/was/always will be a lying pos who tried very hard to weaken our Democratic Republic. Could be he was used by Putin since he has since proven he will commit treason due to his insatiable hunger for power. If you hate the word treason try "seditious conspiracy". I prefer insurrectionist to be sure. Anyhow you get my message I hope. The gop fears dump because they are spineless and just as corrupt as he is. Huge amounts of evidence are piling up against him in NY, GA, and DC. The fake electors have said that dump called and told them to sign on. I could go on but hubby is preparing a sandwich for me. Bye stupid.

  • @jayneberkley9742
    @jayneberkley9742 2 роки тому +82

    How is this ok, this judge should resign, this is the highest court in the land, absolutely!

    • @spir5102
      @spir5102 2 роки тому +2

      Jane, you are right, but who's going to make him resign?

    • @jayneberkley9742
      @jayneberkley9742 2 роки тому +3

      soothsayer well, it should be Judge Roberts , or impeachment, the evidence is for all to see, public opinion is a powerful tool if they care enough, at this stage in the game let’s hope anything is possible 😁.

  • @samanthab1923
    @samanthab1923 2 роки тому +141

    This guy has flaunted the rules from the begining. Why should the wife be any better.

    • @tvdinner325
      @tvdinner325 2 роки тому +6

      No one is mentioning Anita Hill?

    • @polly8130
      @polly8130 2 роки тому +2

      She is worse.

    • @donnacoscia1314
      @donnacoscia1314 2 роки тому +5

      I believe it's FLOUT ( TO IGNORE THE RULES) flaunt is to be proud of

  • @tanthan8376
    @tanthan8376 2 роки тому +13

    “Do what my wife/I say and not what my wife/I do”, a quote from Clarence Thomas

  • @sharonmores8697
    @sharonmores8697 2 роки тому +5

    It is sick to think that scotus Thomas didn't recuse himself. That should be grounds to be disbarred as a judge! Supreme or unsupreme! He has proven that he has disgraced the position. He needs to step down.

  • @haydenwilliams1114
    @haydenwilliams1114 2 роки тому +350

    This guy should've been removed 25 years ago.

    • @user-tw6bj4xx1l
      @user-tw6bj4xx1l 2 роки тому +14

      Yeah totally agree

    • @patevans3709
      @patevans3709 2 роки тому +19

      Nope--never should have been confirmed as SCOTUS!!

    • @mena95lt1vet
      @mena95lt1vet 2 роки тому +5

      100!!!

    • @johnhopkins6260
      @johnhopkins6260 2 роки тому +1

      Never been anointed as high Lord of the Court Supreme.

    • @nacarreira777
      @nacarreira777 2 роки тому +2

      He should have never been seated in the first place....along with Kavanaugh and Barrett.

  • @brightonbabe2139
    @brightonbabe2139 2 роки тому +185

    Justice Thomas, If he was a real judge with ethics he would recuse himself from decisions.l Let’s remember that he was appointed despite credible evidence of sexual harassment of a staff member.

  • @neeper27
    @neeper27 2 роки тому +516

    The SCOTUS must be bound by the same ethics rules as the lower courts. Congress should be the arbitrator. The new law should be called the Thomas Act.

    • @13BGunBunny
      @13BGunBunny 2 роки тому +7

      Congress? 🤔 That's a joke, right?

    • @3_up_moon
      @3_up_moon 2 роки тому +8

      Congress approved his nomination after verbally accosting his victim in front of the whole country (that was our now-president, btw)

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 2 роки тому +16

      If it has anything to do with ethics and morality you can bet Mitch McConnell will use the filibuster to make sure it doesn't pass

    • @tvdinner325
      @tvdinner325 2 роки тому +5

      No one is mentioning Anita Hill?

    • @3_up_moon
      @3_up_moon 2 роки тому +3

      @@tvdinner325 I guess you didn't read all of the responses before typing this out because if you had, youd have seen that I did mention her.

  • @PilotMcbride
    @PilotMcbride 2 роки тому +7

    Remember the words, "Happy Wife, happy life." Of course she has influence of her Judge husband.
    Time for Justice Thomas to be removed, he is as corrupt as she is stupid.

  • @allthingstravon21
    @allthingstravon21 2 роки тому +10

    HE NEES TO RESIGN OR BE IMPEACHED FROM THE COURT FOR HIS CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH A LITERAL INSURRECTIONIST AND SEDITIONIST

  • @billrobbins5874
    @billrobbins5874 2 роки тому +755

    If Justice Thomas would have only recused himself from these cases. This is troubling considering he sits on the Supreme Court.

    • @lindamccarrin3114
      @lindamccarrin3114 2 роки тому +36

      Troubling is an understatement. It's disgusting! Thomas and his wife should have their citizenship taken from them! They are not Americans!

    • @polly8130
      @polly8130 2 роки тому +19

      You are right.

    • @TigerGreene
      @TigerGreene 2 роки тому +11

      That's too bad. I'm troubled. You're troubled. Let's hold hands and sing kumbaya while we all feel troubled.
      Nothing will happen to Thomas, ever. Rebubs are above the law. Next.

    • @hpqzhpqz9688
      @hpqzhpqz9688 2 роки тому +16

      She looks like a Karen. The type to throw a hissy fit if she she got pulled up for landing a quarter of a million bucks ( that we know about ) in her purse for supporting white supremacist terrorists and insurrectionists. I'm picking a disinterested shrug is all anyone is likely to see from her husband.

    • @billrobbins5874
      @billrobbins5874 2 роки тому +3

      @@droughttolerant9334 What? Who?

  • @einsteindarwin8756
    @einsteindarwin8756 2 роки тому +264

    I KNEW IT!!! If this man isn’t bought and paid for, in the least, he is the most self-hating man in modern day history.

  • @ericalston6677
    @ericalston6677 2 роки тому +435

    TIME FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS PERSONALLY, I WOULD HAVE VOTED AGAINST HIS CONFIRMATION TO SUPREME COURT

    • @jamesricker3997
      @jamesricker3997 2 роки тому +16

      Joe Biden did

    • @bozhijak
      @bozhijak 2 роки тому +1

      " PERSONALLY, I WOULD HAVE VOTED AGAINST HIS CONFIRMATION TO SUPREME COURT'. If only it was that simple. It's looking you right in the face . Authorianism of the ignorant, or a mass rejection to this.
      I'll wait.

    • @sprig5173
      @sprig5173 2 роки тому +6

      Time to stack the bench.

    • @luisaogilvie
      @luisaogilvie 2 роки тому +5

      I would have too. After knowing how he has voted with the repugnicants. I gave him the benefit of the doubt. Not thinking that he would defile Thurgood Marshall's seat. He is a good example of what our President Joe Biden said: 'you ain't black'...

    • @3_up_moon
      @3_up_moon 2 роки тому +1

      @@jamesricker3997 biden publicly shamed Thomas's victim in front of the country and voted to confirm him to the USSC

  • @bokani79
    @bokani79 2 роки тому +5

    The problem is the system of having Judges who are expected to be impartial appointed by political leaders

  • @debrajohnson8030
    @debrajohnson8030 2 роки тому +6

    Clarence Thomas should resign immediantly he has a conflict of interest regarding. His wife .

  • @Leonaza7
    @Leonaza7 2 роки тому +861

    Shouldn’t Clarence Thomas be resigning. He must have known she participated in this.

    • @sonicspeed9164
      @sonicspeed9164 2 роки тому +11

      Cupcake, look. Thomas isn’t going anywhere. Dems tried to block him from the court in 1991, it failed. Same for 30 years later.

    • @richardmckinney4963
      @richardmckinney4963 2 роки тому +73

      @@sonicspeed9164 LOL his wife is the one that will make sure that he is removed form office.

    • @bobbybabylon1385
      @bobbybabylon1385 2 роки тому +18

      Bootlicker resign? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    • @liviadix1433
      @liviadix1433 2 роки тому +48

      He doesn't have to, and he is not ethical enough to
      to recognize the damage he is doing to the Court.

    • @rainbeauxunicorn5237
      @rainbeauxunicorn5237 2 роки тому +9

      He did. But imagine a black man voluntary give up power.

  • @ombra711
    @ombra711 2 роки тому +231

    He literally should not be part of the supreme court.

    • @sylviewalker7560
      @sylviewalker7560 2 роки тому +5

      Never should have been appointed to Supreme Court: thx US Senators

    • @hiroader11theanalysts65
      @hiroader11theanalysts65 2 роки тому +1

      Consideration should be the character of the rest of the Conservative loaded Supreme Court.

    • @windycityliz7711
      @windycityliz7711 2 роки тому

      @@sylviewalker7560 Joe Biden voted against his appointment to the court.

    • @idontgiveanf3713
      @idontgiveanf3713 2 роки тому

      @@windycityliz7711 Joe Biden let him out of committee.

    • @windycityliz7711
      @windycityliz7711 2 роки тому

      @@idontgiveanf3713 The committee had already denied recommendation for Bortk, highly controversial. To deny Thomas right after that, and call Bush's bluff - another rather creepy story - put them in a terrible spot. So they sent Thomas to the Senate on an 8-1 vote without recommendation,, not common. And in the Senate, Biden gave Thomas a "Nay" vote and everyone knew he would.

  • @Ngamotu83
    @Ngamotu83 2 роки тому +336

    Let's be honest. Clarence Thomas should never have been appointed to the Supreme Court. In his almost 30 years on the court, he's spoken fewer words than even Amy Coney Barrett has.

    • @terrellcuevo2369
      @terrellcuevo2369 2 роки тому +22

      Absolutely and his Jr is that Kavanaugh asshat.

    • @basilmarasco1975
      @basilmarasco1975 2 роки тому +19

      @@terrellcuevo2369 Yes, Justices Kavanaugh and Thomas have common ground in their both having used the "righteous outrage" act during their hearings.

    • @renee22067
      @renee22067 2 роки тому +10

      Uncle thomas is a puppet and always will be.💩👹🐷👺🐉👻

    • @warrenkelly7720
      @warrenkelly7720 2 роки тому +3

      Yeah he learned how to talk again after judge Scalia died

    • @cc1k435
      @cc1k435 2 роки тому +3

      @@warrenkelly7720 I thought he'd just been waiting for 45, his wife's dream come true for POTUS.

  • @malumejia8766
    @malumejia8766 2 роки тому

    Congratulations Jane. Excellent report! People need to know that!

  • @randyisble5996
    @randyisble5996 2 роки тому +3

    "Term Limits !"
    SCOTUS and Congress both need term limits.
    Both need to pass a security clearance, show last 5 years of taxes and pass a psychological evaluation along with their medical evaluation before being able to run or considered for office.

  • @terrid.1352
    @terrid.1352 2 роки тому +52

    Thomas and wife were big pieces of slime even before Clarence was a member of SCOTUS. They should be investigated.

  • @kevatut23
    @kevatut23 2 роки тому +214

    The only surprise concerning Thomas, is that he is still seated. What a piece of work.

    • @sgrvtl7183
      @sgrvtl7183 2 роки тому +4

      Clarence Thomas Definitely needs to retire

    • @maryknight4109
      @maryknight4109 2 роки тому +2

      Kevin McDonald - I would have changed your last word.

    • @kevatut23
      @kevatut23 2 роки тому +1

      @@maryknight4109 I pondered that a while...

  • @georges3799
    @georges3799 2 роки тому +141

    Wtf has happened to this godforsaken country. This is utterly unethical; if Thomas had any scruples he would resign.

    • @historyboss5857
      @historyboss5857 2 роки тому +5

      Therein lies the problem. He has none.

    • @The_Cali_Dude_88
      @The_Cali_Dude_88 2 роки тому +2

      the religious extreme right 'eVangelical wHite cHristians' are attempting to make America a full blown cHristian nation ruled under canoic law and biblical rule... they own the sEnate and did at one time the Congress. If we let them have power of Congress coupled again in 2022 with Senate control, your life as a American that you'd recognize is over!... are ya in?

    • @catherinebaum3510
      @catherinebaum3510 2 роки тому

      Trump happened.

    • @jackiewalton4876
      @jackiewalton4876 2 роки тому

      Well we know he hasn't any scruples whatsoever and should never have been appointed to replace Thurgood Marshal. I remember Anita Hill recounting all of the sexual harassment she endured from him...Who put the pubic hair in my coke?

  • @stephaniemartins5881
    @stephaniemartins5881 2 роки тому +1

    Fantastic work on Ginny Thomas. Thank you, keep it up.

  • @zackfowler8613
    @zackfowler8613 2 роки тому +4

    We need to have Congress make a law that allows the House and the Senate to have reprimand abilities against the Supreme Court. Also there needs to be a code of ethics implemented in the Supreme Court, as there are none right now.

  • @PapaBear816
    @PapaBear816 2 роки тому +679

    This is why SCJs need limits for terms and less immunity They need to be held accountable for things like this!

    • @shawn6669
      @shawn6669 2 роки тому +17

      Biden needs to pack the court as well to make up for the GOP's dirty SCOTUS appointments.

    • @cc1k435
      @cc1k435 2 роки тому +7

      And a means of removal. It's getting difficult to find anyone beyond reproach in DC, and the GOP in particular was already going off the deep end by the time W arrived. They just keep trying to outdo each other with their outrageous antics year after year, and unfortunately succeeding at it.

    • @mikelayton3810
      @mikelayton3810 2 роки тому +1

      Most of the Justices are ok. Thomas is corrupt so you want to punish all of them - How republican of you.

    • @anonymoususer4376
      @anonymoususer4376 2 роки тому +1

      Accountable for what? An independent spouse?

    • @PapaBear816
      @PapaBear816 2 роки тому +12

      @@anonymoususer4376 So, did you not listen to the news Story, About sever conflict of Interest? Said spouse was part of a committee that penned a letter to the court advocating against the Ruling. for one. IT also looks like Thomas is using his position to get her Powerful positions which is ALSO against the law. I mean, either you're a troll, or just plain stupid.

  • @kaykeelan3765
    @kaykeelan3765 2 роки тому +84

    Surely Chief Justice Roberts should be insisting on Thomas recusing in such cases - what is the point of being CJ if not?

  • @theresakerins4563
    @theresakerins4563 2 роки тому +257

    I truly believe there is a good chance thomas' wife may have helped the traitors on January 6

    • @cynthiahill3104
      @cynthiahill3104 2 роки тому +42

      I had read she was part of Superpac that bussed the Stop the Steal participant's to DC, on January the 6th. What happened to that story.

    • @kathyjones274
      @kathyjones274 2 роки тому +39

      She rented a bus for 1/6 rioters

    • @DauphinPourpre
      @DauphinPourpre 2 роки тому +16

      @Kathy Jones Thank you! I was wondering when someone was going to mention that! I know I'm not the only person that knows that bit of information. Why is it being ignored?

    • @JamesMoore-qf1nn
      @JamesMoore-qf1nn 2 роки тому +13

      May she get swept up in the conspiracy dragnet.

    • @warrenkelly7720
      @warrenkelly7720 2 роки тому +6

      Don't worry it will come out what they doing

  • @kathleencannard8602
    @kathleencannard8602 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you very much. This answers a serious question or two in regards to the Sepreme Court Justice. Why delay until May ?!?!?!?! How many lovely Red Flags does there need be ?!?!?!?
    Thank you for your hard work !
    God Bless You 🙏💗🙏 💗

  • @theinformer4953
    @theinformer4953 2 роки тому +11

    Clarence Thomas and his wife Ginni Thomas are a STENCH on the Supreme Court.

  • @Frenetic321
    @Frenetic321 2 роки тому +42

    Thank you for covering this!

  • @thabom9791
    @thabom9791 2 роки тому +453

    Worth noting: He simply does not provide any reason for his dissent.

    • @seanhovan7426
      @seanhovan7426 2 роки тому

      Who cares.
      I mean Biden violated the Supreme courts orders anyway.
      Remember the eviction moratorium?
      How about Biden denying stimulus to white people?

    • @hoodootheclown929
      @hoodootheclown929 2 роки тому +47

      @@seanhovan7426The propaganda is strong with you.

    • @seanhovan7426
      @seanhovan7426 2 роки тому

      @@hoodootheclown929 hmm no dude. The Biden administration tried handing stimulus out by race. Denying stimulus to white males. Everything democrats screamed about Trump, Biden is actually doing.
      Nothing says racist like race based stimulus

    • @boxbreaker4863
      @boxbreaker4863 2 роки тому +38

      @@seanhovan7426 Only fox news is spewing that lie you delusional little sheep. Watch/read actual news so you're not filling your head with B.S..

    • @lisam8105
      @lisam8105 2 роки тому +30

      @@seanhovan7426 Wow, you should seek help.

  • @ronniew3028
    @ronniew3028 2 роки тому +95

    My trust in SCOTUS has completely tanked. I know I'm not alone. What a stunning display of immorality. Sorry RBG!

    • @thengine7
      @thengine7 2 роки тому +8

      We all know that the republikkkans planned to stop Obama from putting not only a supreme court judge on the bench, but hundreds of federal judges as well.
      Of course the judicial system is broken. Just look at all the cops that are given slaps on the wrist for sexual misconduct and excessive force.

  • @polobhuilean5217
    @polobhuilean5217 2 роки тому +1

    Total hit piece, well done team, should go down well in ‘22 . See you y’a there with thé public réaction.

  • @faceymagee1283
    @faceymagee1283 2 роки тому +1

    Justice Roberts should absolutely ask for Thomas to resign. I have lost all faith the Supreme Court!

  • @jackieheaney8246
    @jackieheaney8246 2 роки тому +69

    Omg wow. No way. I am from Ireland we fought all this. Americis needs to rise up for their own democracy

  • @sloopy5191
    @sloopy5191 2 роки тому +99

    He's probably just a tad scared of what his little wifey might do if he makes her mad by stepping down, removing her best chance at high society.

    • @willmartinez5496
      @willmartinez5496 2 роки тому +3

      Yup. Typical bully wife and he looks miserable with her and scared. She is the Supreme Court Justice by proxy.

  • @bjt81366
    @bjt81366 2 роки тому +208

    As a Black man, I'm sure I can say most of us ain't claiming Clarence Uncle Thomas.

    • @channarosenblatt8197
      @channarosenblatt8197 2 роки тому +14

      Thank you. Please spread this in your community, vote vote vote.

    • @polly8130
      @polly8130 2 роки тому +17

      This help confirm what a lot of black people already thought about him.

    • @raymondclarke9321
      @raymondclarke9321 2 роки тому +7

      Sick and tired of these bootlickers

    • @willmartinez5496
      @willmartinez5496 2 роки тому +6

      You got that right!

    • @pasco4435
      @pasco4435 2 роки тому +2

      😁

  • @whirlwinds4230
    @whirlwinds4230 2 роки тому +1

    Supreme Court Justice, it is time to hold Justice Thomas accountable.

  • @suebarton754
    @suebarton754 2 роки тому +2

    It’s way past time for Thomas to be off the court!

  • @3_up_moon
    @3_up_moon 2 роки тому +348

    Are we forgetting this man's confirmation hearings? Who thought he would be ethical?

    • @terryvarta9306
      @terryvarta9306 2 роки тому +14

      I watched, he played the race card, and guess who let him off, Joe Biden as chairman of the judiciary committee in 1991

    • @Scarletspeedster68
      @Scarletspeedster68 2 роки тому +21

      I haven't forgotten and I am still incensed that he is a member of the SCOTUS.

    • @letsRegulateSociopaths
      @letsRegulateSociopaths 2 роки тому +14

      judging is about deciding the truth of the law, HE can't even Tell THE TRUTH

    • @3_up_moon
      @3_up_moon 2 роки тому +7

      @@terryvarta9306 that wasn't the extent of his problematic conduct. That was the least of his problems.

    • @sylviewalker7560
      @sylviewalker7560 2 роки тому +3

      Listened to the whole hearing, lasted for days. Biden was front and center then. This is where this decision brought the US.

  • @tracibolen1620
    @tracibolen1620 2 роки тому +56

    This is the most corrupt SCOTUS.

  • @durosadiku7915
    @durosadiku7915 2 роки тому +241

    Gini's husband is probably afraid of his wife. She may clap him if he goes against her feelings and opinions. Sad, very sad that Clarence may be a puppet to Gini at home

    • @katem.8816
      @katem.8816 2 роки тому +18

      I doubt it. She should be afraid of him. Remember the creepy allegations against Clarence brought by his Secretary? Biden apologized to the secretary about the hearing/questioning held when Clarence had been nominated for the SC. They were rude to her. Clarence is low grade, imo.

    • @shawnee0718
      @shawnee0718 2 роки тому +11

      Ha, a black man needing validation, divorces his black wife and marries well, that dumpster fire.

    • @richicks425
      @richicks425 2 роки тому +18

      @@katem.8816 If you are speaking of Anita Hill she was NOT his "secretary". She was an attorney that worked under him.

    • @TronaldJDump
      @TronaldJDump 2 роки тому +1

      I mean, I understand. Did you see those Glamour Shots? Id do her bidding too...

    • @terrellcuevo2369
      @terrellcuevo2369 2 роки тому +1

      Definitely.

  • @TickleSalty
    @TickleSalty 2 роки тому +4

    I’m beginning to believe Anita Hill’s side of the story more and more.

  • @terryfraatz424
    @terryfraatz424 2 роки тому +4

    Clarence Thomas shouldn't have gotten approved for the Supreme Court in the first place, I'm a boomer and I remember Anita Hill. This statement is a personal opinion and nothing more.

  • @skyrocketcoast219
    @skyrocketcoast219 2 роки тому +88

    The New Yorker magazine had a very long article found on line about Mrs Clarence Thomas.
    She seems to have a hand in many far far extreme right groups. She is close to Ali Alexander & Paul Gosar, John Eastman & had Trump's ear.
    A total fascist.

    • @pennydoyle5151
      @pennydoyle5151 2 роки тому

      I would love to read it but the NYer doesn't let you in unless you have a subscription.

    • @maryknight4109
      @maryknight4109 2 роки тому

      @@pennydoyle5151 Try your library.

  • @lynnwelch6223
    @lynnwelch6223 2 роки тому +96

    The SCJ's should be held to the same or even a higher code of ethics than the lower courts, they are the Supreme Court after all and should have Supreme Ethics. We need to start over with 9 (or some number) new justices and have in place term limits.

  • @daveodell700
    @daveodell700 2 роки тому +32

    Clarence Thomas and his wife Ginni are the evil ones. They both have a lot of guilt, and this is what it leads to.

  • @phillipellison4758
    @phillipellison4758 2 роки тому +3

    I lost confidence in Clarence when he ruled in favor of Monsanto's floating GMO pollen on other farmers crops making those farmers liable , and could be sued by Monsanto . Unless you destroy saved seed , buy Monsanto's seed and products or face litigation.

  • @chelseafn104
    @chelseafn104 2 роки тому +1

    Everything he has done has been a Conflict of Interest. Time for him to go!!

  • @granannie1012
    @granannie1012 2 роки тому +52

    Clarence had proven over and over he’s without any kind of ethics and seems to hate the fact he’s black.

    • @MrChannel19
      @MrChannel19 2 роки тому

      Is this her issue of payback for the Anita Hill accusations?

    • @granannie1012
      @granannie1012 2 роки тому

      @@MrChannel19 I don’t know what he was like before that, but after she told the world about his nasty ways, he became the angriest man on the bench. Now he has Kavanaugh to whine with. Anita Hill should have been the judge, not him. Yuck.

  • @rodneygangloff6685
    @rodneygangloff6685 2 роки тому +85

    Thomas is creepy, and now we know why, his boss is a freak.

  • @heatherc2939
    @heatherc2939 2 роки тому +86

    The Soros idiocy is ironic coming from Ginni (dark money) Thomas.
    I just finished reading Mayer's excellent essay!

    • @polly8130
      @polly8130 2 роки тому +9

      It’s time for him to step down.

    • @gbadesakin
      @gbadesakin 2 роки тому +3

      The Republicans are always projecting. They are quick to pick over the tiniest amount of corruption but of course they are often neck deep in manure.

    • @lindawilliams2211
      @lindawilliams2211 2 роки тому

      Have any of you Dems ever been influenced by George Soros or read one thing of his ???

    • @heatherc2939
      @heatherc2939 2 роки тому

      @@lindawilliams2211 nope! It is why we laugh.

  • @seanc1898
    @seanc1898 2 роки тому +2

    Just when you thought things couldn't get any dirtier and more corrupt in US politics and law, this comes along. How could there NOT be a rule or law in place addressing this behaviour smh!

  • @tonyd3698
    @tonyd3698 2 роки тому +1

    Why isn't John Roberts and the Congress not speaking out about the disregard for the rules of law?

  • @thjbird
    @thjbird 2 роки тому +42

    It’s called blatant corruption

  • @bayareaconsult4115
    @bayareaconsult4115 2 роки тому +57

    Justice Robert is the guilty one here for not looking after the transparency of his team !!!

  • @melkor6373
    @melkor6373 2 роки тому +47

    Pigs have many uses. Apparently nobody told Justice Thomas that laying with them isn't one of them.

    • @therealheisenberg6182
      @therealheisenberg6182 2 роки тому +4

      I am sure pigs everywhere are insulted by being associated with that nasty old had.

    • @melkor6373
      @melkor6373 2 роки тому +4

      @@therealheisenberg6182 Fair point.

  • @theldun1
    @theldun1 2 роки тому +3

    I always knew Thomas was a mean and miserable SOB! Now we know why.

  • @helanna9843
    @helanna9843 2 роки тому +2

    If I saw this happening in another country I would think it was a banana republic. Thomas should recuse himself of any matter before the court in which his wife has involvement.

  • @stevesepulveda7398
    @stevesepulveda7398 2 роки тому +33

    This madness of hypocrisy is a sign of the end of our democracy

  • @andrewkoh1064
    @andrewkoh1064 2 роки тому +47

    This judge is showing poor judgment or laboring under the iron thumb of his spouse???
    He should recuse himself if he doesn't resign!!!

    • @spir5102
      @spir5102 2 роки тому +1

      Andrew, Thomas's wife looks like a Karen, and I bet she is. Complete power over the black man seems to be her goal.

  • @Alph12
    @Alph12 2 роки тому +96

    This is why the high court needs to be expanded

    • @polly8130
      @polly8130 2 роки тому +10

      You are right. Changes need to be made.

    • @jackboot3946
      @jackboot3946 2 роки тому +9

      The more Justices on the SC, the better the chances of fairer, more balanced decisions.

    • @imisstoronto3121
      @imisstoronto3121 2 роки тому +4

      @@jackboot3946 it means that the US might not put itself back in the 1900's on womens rights and not allow a minority to force its opinion on the majority.

    • @jackboot3946
      @jackboot3946 2 роки тому +2

      @@imisstoronto3121 Too late I'm afraid. It's already done that.

  • @mikebecker4430
    @mikebecker4430 2 роки тому +1

    How are people not completely appalled by this absolute conflict of interest instead of just saying, oh well, that's just the way it is. Unbelievable!!!!

  • @jerryjones7293
    @jerryjones7293 2 роки тому +1

    It was maddening to learn that the SC doesn't have a binding code of ethics which can be enforced.

  • @nw9353
    @nw9353 2 роки тому +131

    Imagine the whaling and screaming from the GOP if the roles were reversed.

    • @kevinkerwin4118
      @kevinkerwin4118 2 роки тому +2

      I'd imagine it'd look much like this comment section.

    • @lindadbse1919
      @lindadbse1919 2 роки тому +4

      They dig for dirt then create insane conspiracy theories while constantly pointing the finger at the left for the very things they are doing in real time. This kind of crazy could make you crazy if your mind isn't strong. Dems need to hold steady as they move forward through this storm of chaos and violence from the right.

    • @nw9353
      @nw9353 2 роки тому +2

      @@lindadbse1919 The best way to confront a liar is to call them a liar to there face and keep doing it. Don't let up and STOP giving them a platform ! Now if the Dems could stop the hand wringing and grow some teeth instead of this playing to the court of public opinion we might actually pull out of this tailspin.

    • @kelliott7864
      @kelliott7864 2 роки тому

      I wouldn't be surprised if the GOP did some whaling, or even dolphin spearing for that matter.

    • @nw9353
      @nw9353 2 роки тому +1

      @@kelliott7864 Yep busted. Hooked on spell checker is I. ;-)

  • @finnjacobsen684
    @finnjacobsen684 2 роки тому +145

    Having judges that cannot be fired is part of the foundation of an autocracy. Great journalistic work.

    • @jamesrodriquez2863
      @jamesrodriquez2863 2 роки тому +11

      They can be impeached by the House and removed from SCOTUS upon conviction by the Senate.

    • @brianholloway6205
      @brianholloway6205 2 роки тому

      Another person who hasn’t read the constitution…

  • @humphschriek1637
    @humphschriek1637 2 роки тому +114

    Term limits for the Supreme court Justices! To keep another Clarence Thomas from holding this powerful position for life!

    • @therealheisenberg6182
      @therealheisenberg6182 2 роки тому +5

      We need term limits for all levels of judges and politicians.

    • @nicolepsy
      @nicolepsy 2 роки тому +4

      All government offices should have term limits

    • @humphschriek1637
      @humphschriek1637 2 роки тому

      @@therealheisenberg6182 Exactly Duane!

    • @WayneMercy
      @WayneMercy 2 роки тому +3

      The reason there aren’t term limits is because it’s supposed to incentivize judges to disregard politics since they don’t need to worry about getting re-elected. Clearly it isn’t working however I must admit I still don’t know if removing term limits would make things better. Judges would definitely start inflicting politics into all their decisions to ensure they get elected again

    • @shellecapos8574
      @shellecapos8574 2 роки тому

      @@WayneMercy Like u said it’s not working.

  • @marthamartha3222
    @marthamartha3222 2 роки тому +1

    This judge needs to be removed from the justice department immediately.

  • @gerryhemmer1573
    @gerryhemmer1573 2 роки тому +2

    When he was appointed in 1991 I was totally against him and time has done nothing to cause me to change my mind about him. He was sleazy then and he is sleazy now.

  • @thesuncollective1475
    @thesuncollective1475 2 роки тому +40

    I wonder why Clarence voted for Trump on 1/6? Can we have a reason from Clarence, well done Bush!

  • @sylviewalker7560
    @sylviewalker7560 2 роки тому +80

    Clarence Thomas wife was and is front and center. He should retire. Yikes. She's financing them. Yikes.

    • @sharonsnow6295
      @sharonsnow6295 2 роки тому +5

      SHE WAS A DRUNK, WHO LONG AFTER THE FACT CALLED ANITA IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT, TELLING HER SHE OWED HER HUSBAND AN APLOGY!! SHE COUD NOT STAND IT, BECAUSE CLARENCE WANTED TO F**K A BLACK WOMAN, SHE KNEW HE WAS LYING!! I WATCHED THE WHOLE THING ON TV, THOSE ANGRY OLD WHITE GUYS, WHO THOUGHT THE LITTLE WOMAN SHOULD BE CHAINED TO THEIR STOVES, SENATORS, BRUTALLY TORE ANITA APART!! I AM SO HAPPY ANITA SURVIVED, TO SPEAK OUT ABOUT IT!! NOW DAYS, WOMEN SUE OVER A PAT ON THE BACK, THIS FROM A SURVIVOR!!

    • @willmartinez5496
      @willmartinez5496 2 роки тому +1

      She makes the judicial decisions, he looks miserable and I bet he's scared to death of her.

  • @xtopheralanfoster3964
    @xtopheralanfoster3964 2 роки тому +58

    THOMAS HAD ABSOLUTELY NO BUSINESS BEING A JUSTICE CONSIDERING HIS PAST BEHAVIOR {ANITA HILL}

  • @chelittle6433
    @chelittle6433 2 роки тому +3

    You know if there's ever a reason to remove somebody from the supreme Court bench this is it. The Coke can didn't get him but the ethics violations will. And it proves he's not worthy of wearing the black robes or swinging the gavel. And if they can't remove them then they need to take it to 13 on the bench.

  • @DanTheMailman330
    @DanTheMailman330 2 роки тому +1

    How can the ethical standards for federal judges not also apply to the SC? INSANITY.

  • @stefanschleps8758
    @stefanschleps8758 2 роки тому +21

    Good example of why free speech needs limits.
    The Qanon virus needs be stamped out.
    Ms. Thomas needs a shrink.
    Clarence needs to step down.
    He is a disgrace to the court.

  • @JP-fn5xt
    @JP-fn5xt 2 роки тому +98

    Judges activism is quite astounding, without care to morals.
    A number of instances, of a number of judges.

    • @victoriabaker4400
      @victoriabaker4400 2 роки тому +2

      Judges' "activism" is basically a rightwing buzzword referring to judges and decisions they disagree with. What we are talking about here is the appearance of corruption, which is why judicial ethics are there-- rules put in place to avoid even the appearance of corruption.

  • @faithnelson6069
    @faithnelson6069 2 роки тому +83

    i hope this gets a lot more press coverage.

    • @el_bronco77
      @el_bronco77 2 роки тому

      Only on CNN and MSNBC. Too bad nobody watches them. I just come for comedy.

  • @njm3211
    @njm3211 2 роки тому +2

    Term limits and some better defined rules for justices' spouses and family members. Only in the US is such egregious behavior overlooked. Shameful

  • @annefitz7346
    @annefitz7346 2 роки тому +1

    Unfreaking believable. He shouldn’t even be on the court in my opinion. I watched all the Anita hill hearings. I’m with her.

  • @richardlynch5632
    @richardlynch5632 2 роки тому +11

    YIKES...!!!
    DESPICABLE THOMAS
    SCOTUS cannot have this stench surrounding our most important of institutions.
    Thomas must resign or be impeached.

  • @BigDanOz
    @BigDanOz 2 роки тому +19

    Thank you for exposing evil to the light sir! We need to see this truth

  • @truthspeaker4904
    @truthspeaker4904 2 роки тому +39

    Thomas is bought and paid for..She probably makes his rulings for him..He is pathetic and needs to resign..one of the worst justice ever..

  • @hyseize
    @hyseize 2 роки тому +2

    If only there was something in The Constitution (like the 14th Amendment, Sec 3) that could deal with people who "aid & comfort insurrectionists" who are now "unqualified to hold public office".
    OH, that's right, we do & should use it! ASAP!

  • @glendagraves1637
    @glendagraves1637 2 роки тому

    Thanks for doing in depth, quality reporting.