The video points out that 70% of India’s population lives in rural areas, yet all TV networks rely on that one set of images from a super dense Indian city to represent India.
@@gamer-ff6mh Its the very opposite in India. Three of the four largest ministries in India, consumer affairs, agriculture and rural development all transfer tax revenue generated in the cities to India’s villages.
I feel weird when I see the 2070 graph people over 65 again and again. The fact that I am included in that graph somehow makes me feel old and I am just 19.
@@imranshaik2282 See man this is what gives me hope. My dream is to live healthy until 2100, and witness all the great achievements of humanity in this century!!!
Just a small suggestion, the footage used of India seems to be many years old, our streets are not always dust filled, with people carrying luggage over their heads and with half broken vehicles on the road. WSJ is a large platform, please do right by the places you cover on the world scale.
Idk about you but living in Kolkata, this is pretty much a daily scene. You don't have to be in Sealdah station to see this; just drive through Park Circus or Behala. I know what you're trying to say, images such as these perpetuate 'third world' stereotypes of India as still underdeveloped, but we are an overpopulated postcolonial nation with many migrant workers still highly exploited, precarious, and poor, and regardless of whether our middle class throngs malls with shopping bags or our "lower class" on streets with luggage over their heads, the reality is that we are still treating ourselves and each other, performatively, as obedient capitalist workers, slave ants -- and personally, the images of malls seem the most dystopian and depressing.
One way India can do right by its people is by investing heavily in its infrastructure and then relying on businesses (in-house and external) that will care about ethical and humanitarian issues and not be solely driven by profits. But the lack of infrastructure and huge unskilled workforce is no net positive.
Infrastructure is growing now faster compared to other decades(urban transit, expressways,institutions etc) main problem or fear is increasing rate of unemployment which will never solve completely atleast not in near future to defeat unemployment it should grow 18% which is nearly impossible.
@@rishav2205 Wow, well i think if we build infrastructure even faster we would create relatively more employment through contruction itself but also help create an ecosystm for people to create and build more businesses which would create more employment, however the other major issue is the lack of skilled workforce who is able to compete with increasing cost effective technological solutions hence why i say the future employment lies in the effort of ethical and humanitarian driven businesses more. With the metric you offered makes me think India shuld seriously enact a population control policy because not doing so will only ensure more people will suffer more in coming decades...but maybe im wrong im not aware of all the metrics of the economy on the macro level.
@@KD9-37 yeah we should have more businesses that can generate employment but another positive is happening that many companies are going setup industries in future.
India is already doing that... foreign investment in India has increased as well! India is where China was 10-12 years ago. 50% of India is still living close to poverty line and hopefully these investments will push them away from poverty!
It is asinine that India will have more people than China this decade. Also, this is unrelated, but it really saddens me a lot that in several China vs. India military comparison videos, many YT users support India over China and that so many YT users belittle China and their army. China seems to get way too much hate, while India gets too much support and pride. I can literally list 1K comments that support India and 1K comments that dislike China. I heard words such as "Jai Hind India" and "Support India from Japan". China always seems to carry the burden of hate in many YT videos, very unfair.
mainly cause of the CCP. Also India is seen as the underdog, though I guess not anymore soon as they are one of the fastest developing countries in the world now due to relatively large infusion into infrastructure and pro capitalist reforms. But don’t be sad man, the West also has its own problems and I know as i live here 😂
That’s what listening to sensationalized “free” media does to people. Common sense and fact checking goes out the window because of hate, confirmation bias, etc. I saw a video the other day claiming that India’s new STOBAR carrier was “better” than the new Chinese CATOBAR carrier and the only evidence was “STOBAR carriers are tried and true” lol
That's because China bullies its neighbours. If China wants to counter the US, it needs to have a stable and friendly relationship with its neighbours. When they stop bullying everyone, people's perception may change. Chinese people are nice but half the world hates their government.
what do you expect? UA-cam is banned in China while it isnt banned in India, so of course Indian nationalists are more prevalent than chinese nationalists
Right now i believe India should focus on investing in infrastructure that will boost in connecting the states of India and its economies. The economy of China is extremely connected and even tho they might speak different languages (similar writing script but different pronounciation) they have been able to create a system that is extremely efficient. Once India can fix it's infra problem they can allow the economy to grow even more as now India can supply itself and pay itself and grow it's domestic market while producing goods that might entice the global market.
Just investing Infra is Not enough...there has to be people and businesses (both small n big) to utilise that infra to do more business and for other convenience.
In India most of the graduates from colleges do not have sufficient skills. Majority colleges in India are just diploma producing mills. Also there is lack of quality paid jobs for many leading to a scramble for government jobs. Well off or the smart people take off to western countries for greener pastures. It's not all doom and gloom but that there are many problems which need to be urgently addressed
@@farazsyed8264 we used regions to divide the US. But we made up Region 10 so we could transfer expenses to the US. As we didn’t allow India to show a profit.
Flee to foreign nations is a better terminology. Why not educate some kids here? Very few of kids going abroad that I know are smart. They are all there due to financial or social capital. So much so that I rejected my opportunity and decided to stay back and stay back. Maybe I will teach only a thousand kids in my lifetime. So be it. Better that than a meaningless life of hoarding money and handing it over to foreign nations for buying a degree ticket to their jobs
😂😂 it's always fascinating how the western media portrays India and Indian cities with highly dense images of old towns like dude there are more places to show population 😆 as a normal Indian we don't usually see these kinds of crowds or slums like these media houses portray
There is no way India will ever touch 1.7 billion. The fertility rate of India is now 1.9 in 2023 and is declining at the rate of 7-8% per annum. India's population will peak around 1.6 billion between 2050-2055 and then decline to 900 million by 2100. At the same time, China's population will not be 750 million but somewhere between 500-550 million.
1.9 fertility rate of India? Where did you get this data from?? It's still more than 2.1. And not to mention the fact that India has millions of illegal/undocumented immigrants from much more densely populated neighbor Bangladesh, plus Rohingyas. It never seemed they would be deported in future and rather would get regularised here over time and these people have high fertility rates. And, densely populated states like Bihar and eastern UP still maintains fertility rate over 3 even now. So, touching a figure of 1.7 billion seems no unrealistic to me.
I'm applying for software jobs and so many positions I see open are hiring people from within India. Would not surprise me if they become a tech superpower (which I guess some people view it as already there, but that's debatable)
Tons of companies hire Indian employees to do lower level jobs. If you have had the chance to work with them, I don’t think you would think this though. They’re super talented and bright, but they generally will only do exactly as told and don’t propose independent ideas. It can often be frustrating as someone from the US where independent thought and innovation is highly sought after and stressed.
@@ThisDugan I think workplace culture partly plays a role: things are fairly hierarchical, so lower-level employees aren't really encouraged/incentivized to innovate.
India needs to get rid of its lingering caste biases first. There have been countless cases of Indian workers in foreign companies refusing to listen to their manager because the boss comes from a lower caste, or even more egregiously, the manager willingly submitting to being bullied by their underlings due to his inferior social position. That is ridiculous, and must be stamped out.
@@Jhonnycomelatei don't deny it but could've taken better pics. For example - They chose a crowded market as if that doesn't exist in China but i didnt see any of that in this vid tho I mean they literally showed pics of a car expo, people outside Louis Vuitton and people working in factory while showing China But all good we move i guess. These western news outlets will continue to get clowned on even more in the future
@@caamitinfinite Taiwan u mean republic of china Hong Kong u mean Sar of china tibet u mean province of china south china sea is calimed by all countries not only by china
Fun fact, There was No such a country called "india" before 1947. India was made by British by combining bunch of villages tribes together. Go study history before arguing.
Nothing against India but if take into account AI will replace many jobs in the next future and you have a enormous unskilled population this looks like more like burden than a advantage. Just look at Pakistan and Nigeria both surpassed Brazil population but that doesn't mean anything if they don't have proper infrastructure a good system of education and most people live in poverty.
@@pratik6342 Many types of Manufacturing facilities have been automated and will be auto mated. Just look at the amount of auto mation Car factories have...look at how much they were automated 20 yrs ago and now
@@pratik6342 Well those jobs will just be verification jobs. Like you have the watchman outside the supermarket who stamps on your bill without actually checking properly because the machine is anyways right and it has already verified the goods are proper and nothing is stolen
I work in automation And believe me no one is gonna replace men for a long time The only thing AI is gonna do is build things more efficiently ultimately jobs will shift towards service and leisure which is the trend from lst 3 industrial revolution
Is 1.7 billion people even sustainable for India? I think China's current population of around 1.4 billion is already overpopulated, and China has greater landmass.
Means the powerhouse will shift. China became the factory of the world and so it became rich. If china's population shrinks people will look elsewhere for cheap labor. Obviously that is what brings in the money
@@arifahmedkhan9999 China is installing more industrial robots than the rest of the world combined. Manufacturing won't leave China. And ChatGPT is rapidly replacing remote service jobs Indian are good at. India's younger generation is doomed.
1. This video just showed the differences between India and China from 1960s to current dates 2. This did not provide any in depth analysis regarding the 'profound effect' of India being the most populous country on the global economy. 3. Use the correct map of India 4. When showing India's population, there are a good number of metropolitans with great levels of urbanization and infrastructure. So WSJ, you might want to portray India's case in a brighter light.
@@sreetansai Are you suggesting India is not overpopulated ? The population in China the largest is far more dispersed than it is in India. The city western media portrays as being "populated" is not even located in the most populated state. So before whining about unfairness measure up to the claims you make. This pathetic compulsion that forces Indians to lash out at the first instance of our shortcomings being aired (which are real) is most revealing of our pathetic post colonial insecurity. Defend the country when there is a reason to when it's genuinely under threat or misrepresentation not when a mirror is held up to your national image.
If the economic rise and development is guaranteed by the rise of population, then the most densely populated state of Bihar in India would have been more fairly developed instead of being one of the most impoverished states in India.
@Tyt Xlx At the same time, Bihar also need to work on some cultural reforms to check it's fertility rate which is more than 3 and highest in India. Apart from this, I don't think power sharing should be completely loose free as per the population ratio shared by the states as the equal representation and opportunity of the diverse federal states based on their linguistic and cultural identity needs to be guaranteed to some extent by some mechanism regardless of their population size. Else, smaller distinct states in India would practically loose their voice in the parliament.
“A nation becomes great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they will never get to sit in.” Come on, fellow Indians! Let’s work hard today to make sure our children and grandchildren enjoy a life of prosperity tomorrow. 🇮🇳
@@GM_- While I don’t support a Hindu rashtra per se, it doesn’t mean Muslims will just disappear. Muslims have lived and thrived in Hindu rashtras of India for hundreds of years. You have a misconception about Hinduism.
Or maybe she is tired that everytime indjan and American media force chinese to compare. even I would feel tired and irritated when people keep forcing me to talk about same topic again and again lol .
Hey WSJ, Thank you for showing India as a one big market street. We Indians never go out without atleast 10k people already on the street. Please we are a developing nation not a poor country
The declining fertitlity rate is a common symptome of the industrializing process and access to contraception. The one child policy was not a deciding factor in this, but definitely made it worse.
I as an one child policy product think it is great!!! For those people worries about labor force, I think many jobs will be replaced with robots in the near future.
As an Indian, I believe it's high time India implements stringent population control. We don't need to be breeding and growing this expanding labor pool for capitalists to exploit. We should be focusing on living well, eating well, developing creatively and technologically while sustainably, and protecting our habitats and homes. India looks dystopian.
@@MrPastaTube1 In fact, if the Chinese government did not implement the one-child policy at that time, it would not be able to support so many people under China's leisurely resources. According to relevant calculations, if China had liberalized childbearing, today's China would have 2.6 billion people, which is a terrible figure. No country can support so many people
So India should invest heavily in infrastructure so that companies would relocate manufacturing there creating a lot of jobs. I guess in the next few decades "made in India" will be a thing.
The biggest political push is made in india only. Also in recent budget the capital expenditure increased to 2.5% ( the highest in 75 years ). And is projected to increase as a percentage of budget. We are seeing everyday buildings being constructed. Roads being enlarged. New railway tracks. New airports being inaugurated. The push is much high.
I'm from India. I don't know anybody who has more than 3 Kids. Normal is 1 - 2. Abnormal is 3. Its the common these days, Gone are days of people having more than 3 Kids, It might have been true in the older generation, Not today.
Reason for poor/lower tend to have more than 2 is the thought of more hands = higher the chances of family coming out of poverty Mortality Rate (malnutrition) among poor is also an another reason. only g0v’s can address this issue - can’t blame the poor.
With fast evolving AI, ML, robotics and automation, do WSJ really believe that in 2070, countries would still need young population to manufacture products ?
It's possible because people are basically used as captive markets. Like sheep. You are right that the meaningless jobs will be very high. But the government will find some way of employing. Be it in the army or police or vigilante s etc
Countries will definitely need young people to *CONSUME* products, regardless of who or what makes them. Massive production will be useless without an equally large consumer base. And consumer bases are what large successful economies are built upon.
Just because India has a similar population to China, it is not inevitable that India will be as successful as China. Except in population, the two countries do not have much in common, either in culture & history or physical geography. China will be China and India will be India.
Let's just hope that we humans will be able to eradicate poverty in any part of the world soon, and unite together to not fight for land etc. And will be advancing in becoming borderless world
@@hottube6254 you assumed that i am indian/paki muslim so you wrote that comment! Lol uneducated fella when will you grow people ? Lodu me Gujarati hindu hu , sale likh ne ke liye internet mil gaya to kahi per bhi hag denga ? … sarcasm suna hy kabhi lodu
Over all, what that change in India´s population means for EEUU?; it mean there is another country that will surpass EEUU´s Economy by 2028; EEUU will be the third power in the world by that year.
India has quality population. They are young and ready. A peaceful population with enough to eat and survive, educated enough to drive the world and progressing well, and the population will taper by year 2100 to 800 million from current 1400 million. Nothing to worry about INDIA. A democracy and not thrusting outward and believing in assimilation than confrontation, secular and multilingual and multi ethnic etc.
@@mausam760 In some states like Kerala not even have enough kids in schools, the school I studied had around 1500 kids in the 1970s, now stands at total of 50 kids in eight levels. Many houses are even empty. Not many people for work too.
"I like how India does have Hundreds of urban metropolitan cities and skyscrapers but still they manage to find out those old footages of slums and overcrowded areas" lol Like seriously, If you can't find those pictures just ask me, I will give you video's of my neighborhood and workplace at free of cost. Then just watch it with both of your healthy eyes and keep it in your mind until you die that India's infrastructure has grown alot over the past decade....
I love the way how western Media show China financial capital Shanghaito represent Thier country and India oldest city of Banaras to represent my country Hahaha😂😂 this is how they do propaganda against any developing country😂😂😂
That's typical. Western media also show footage from Bangladesh overcrowded trains to show world that indian trains are like that. Western media will always show india like this even after india becomes 3rd largest economy in few years.
India's government has a traditional policy of resisting and restricting foreign investment. They see foreign investment as a threat. I have read that this has decreased. I wonder how much, and if it is enough.
Those r propagandas u have read for political reasons from this same media group. American & Europeans invest where their political & geopolitical interests r. It has nothing to do with any countries policy.
India's equites was the second best performed stocks in 2022 with FII (foreign investment institutes) holding 20% of them. Make in India policy is actually the opposite of restricting, it's an invitation to investors. The restriction policies, i think, are primarily there to prevent monopoly of foreign investors which destroys local businesses.
You can't blame us. Last time we allowed a Company, it costed us *"45 trillion Pounds being looted from us"* , 250 years of Colonisation , Intense Racism and Partition in 1947.
It's not like India's population increase happened overnight. Yes, it's a milestone. But if an increased population had any economic impact, we would have seen its clear effects over the past decade or so in tandem with their population increase. If you have been following the news, they pointed out that AI would replace many jobs in China. Having a larger population would actually worsen the employment situation. Considering the exponential development of tech like AI, countries should be decreasing their population right now, not increasing. It's about timing. India got their timing wrong.
AI and automation can actually ruin a country. Technological advancements were good in the past as it made it more effective in certain fields. But now people will only loose jobs. People will not go for kids in such situations. In the end a countries progress depends upon the government and tax payers. If there aren't many Tax payers then a country can't grow or do well.
India needs to upskill it's young population and invest heavily on development of ecosystem so it can provide adequate jobs to it's young population.... I am really optimistic and hope for the best❤
China still has hundreds of mililons of people in the small villages who are not yet employed in factories. So if the population falls, that will not reduce the labour force.
that makes no sense. the population pyramid takes those 'small villages' into account as well. Its talking about how the country overall is aging, including those small villages.
There is no good future for country like India. At best, it will function as a near stable middle income country & at worst, it will be a civil war like chaos of various fighting groups like caste, religion or language. Caste, religion & language dominate politics. 43% politician in Parliament have criminal records. Even scientists,teachers, doctors etc are selected by caste. And if the best candidate from a caste has marks in negative still he will be selected but that vacant position won't be given to candidate of other caste even if he is scoring 100%. 😂 This is a banana republic.
@@preetiraut7700Churchill's exact quote. "If Independence is granted to India, power will go to the hands of rascals, rogues, freebooters; all Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight amongst themselves for power and India will be lost in political squabbles. A day would come when even air and water would be taxed in India." What is wrong in this statements ? 9th fail will become CM of Bihar. I have already given data of 43% MP's have criminal cases. Others don't have cases doesn't mean they are pure. In many state assemblies, criminals are about 60-70%. We are giving environment cess. So obviously air is also taxed but indirectly still we aren't getting clean air. In 1990's when China was making special economic zones, we were playing mandal kamandal & whole 90's decade was wasted in multiple unstable governments. BJP comes to power in 2014 with ache din promise now their whole politics is about religion and only show off. For example Vande Bharat is a fancy EMU whose average speed is only 88 kmph. Some real work has been done but that's not even being near to what is required.
In all of this discussion people miss one most important thing to mention ... "the immigration" China may loosen up its policy for immigration. Same way there will be gigantic number of people who will leave India for other countries. I mean this is happening right now, lot of people are leaving India for wester nations where population is plummeting already.
@@achillesarmstrong9639 dude many talented folks are coming back also , life in the west maybe a luxury one but the culture there is hostile , I mean indians are working there for some dollars , they have started coming back to start businesses here.
@@yashvaibhav4207I think that "hostile" would be an exaggeration. There are numerous Indians who are present in Western nations as employees and students who do not face any issues that would be worse than the problems you would face in India. Sure, there are some serious flaws, but we can say the same about our own country (which is what convinces people to leave in the first place).
Just because India’s population looks young it doesn’t mean they’re economically useful. What if the trends point to high youth unemployment in India? Civil unrest? Social discourse. More shift to male gender? What does that mean to India’s population. I urge you to visit and see how labour productivity performs.
If you look at the recent data, India is past that stage. The sex ratio is improving very fast, and economically, India is now at the same stage, China was in the year 2006, i.e. 3.7 Trillion USD. While maintaining a demographic profile, which is the same as what China had in 1991. Also, the Indian government has finally opened up a lot of sectors in the economy for domestic private and international players that were previously closed. At the same time, the US-China rivalry is pushing a lot of export oriented industries into India. India has a solid 50-year window to grow economically on both exports led and consumption led metrics. Indian leadership has to be extremely stupid and incompetent to let this opportunity go.
@tytxlx6503 We will take that so called security seat along with the veto. Write it down if in next 18 months this thing doesn't happen than the existence of both you or UN will cease.
@Tyt Xlx why is Russia UNSC permanent member despite of its stance on Ukraine Crimea?India has been dependent on Russia for military supplies , so that's the reason. India has trusted on some of the countries in the past , but none of them helped it when it's needed the most . Only Russia did !
In twenty years , India pulled 300 million out of UN defined levels of dire poverty, and it did it as a democracy, building consensus , taking people along, it took the tougher but more sustainable path, it did not force sterilise its people or commit forced abortions . A few communist police states also grew richer , by destroying the middle class in the west, making dirt cheap copies of both licensed and pirated goods, stealing copyright, tbieving, anything to make a quick buck and keep its vast hordes employed .This path was tempting for other developing nations, but India stood strong, tall and proud , salute to India, the land the of the light of Asia, Sri Siddhartha Gautama Bauda🙏🏾😘👍🇮🇳
@@RonaldinhoGoatthey were born and/or raised here. Absolutely. It's just that they rarely stay here. That's what pisses me off. Not that they leave but that they are forced to do so, that the incentives to stay here is dwarfed by the incentive to leave.
China's population may be shrinking but there are still so many people living in rural areas of China. Also one child policy made things worse but Chinese women are more independent in decision making than Western ladies in some ways. So the singles population is increasing. So do you want Chinese women to be more conservative? Western countries will experience the same if they stop immigration. Also there's a very low amount of workers in China as factory workers. The industries are automated nowadays. It's not wise to trust manual labour in the future.
Foreign cameraman comes to India. Taxi driver: which city do you want to go to sir? Cameraman: Either take me to the dirtiest village you know of in India or the most overcrowded place you can find. 😂
that's what fascinates the western tourists. why would someone from Europe, North America or Australia go to India to see fancy buildings and restaurants? xD
Have a reality check Focus on the number Losing the humanity In the 2022 Global Hunger Index, India ranks 107th out of the 121 countries with sufficient data to calculate 2022 GHI scores. With a score of 29.1, India has a level of hunger that is serious.
Lancet study of 2019 said India will peak at 1.6 billion in 2048. UN is still being conservative here. New experts don't even believe 2048 as the peak. I will be surprised even if the peak moves in 2040s.
India is in a growth trajectory for next 15 years, demographics will help with more consumer spending 500 % more from now especially education and gadgets like mobile phones, tablets or whichever is relevant 5G, 6G etc
I don't understand why you use yellow filter for India and blue filter other develod countries. Is anyone know why west media use yellow filter for India
Not to mention that modern pakistan and bangladesh are parts of historical India. And both of these countries are also among the largest population countries in the world. At its peak this century, india, pakistan, and bangladesh could host 1/3 of the earth's population. Thats incredible!
Pakistan's Punjab, India's Punjab and UP-Bihar-Bengal(North India except the himalayan states)and Bangladesh have very fertile soil and can feee its population easily They have had a large population since the beginning controlling 1/4th of world economy before British arrvived
@@RafaySarmad Maurya empire ka naam suna hai? Gupta empire la naam suna hai? Most of India, paki.punjab and sindh were under them Even marathas ruled from 1674-1818 over subcontinent😂chutiya
Whenever, Western media talks about India and shows ,rural India from decades back with dusty roads and poverty, I think it's racist.... please put your act together and do proper research before publishing anything...
Despite the current problems facing China because of the One Child Policy, it was arguably still a success. China was poor, it made some gambles, now it is not poor. As a nation, and in the coastal cities, China is now very advanced. Despite its knock-on effects, the demographic dividend is potentially the main reason China is no longer one of the poorest nations on earth, which it was just 50 years ago.
Large population = big economy ? This is really stupid reasoning. Both China and India have big populations through out the 20th century and yet they lagged far behind Japan and western countries. It's only when China started to open up the country and reform its economy from 1978, then China's economy started to rise. It continued to rise until China became the second largest economy in the world overtaking Japan and other western countries. Therefore big population does not magically transform India into a developed country.
@Joy That's a wrong assumption that per capita income GDP will increase with increasing population. E. g The population of 1 million people with per capita income GDP of US $2,000 When the population quickly increased to 2 million, the per capita income GDP does not remain the same, it's going to go down by 1/2 to US $ 1,000 if there's little economic growth. Furthermore, more babies born does not immediately translate into greater work force. You have to wait until 20 years later that these newly born to grow up and become productive members of the country. E. g a family man earns US $2,000 yearly. When his wife gives birth to 10 children, it doesn't mean that his family is becoming richer, that his his yearly income will increase 10X to US $20,000 with 10 children. Big family of 10 children is a huge burden to the man with small income. He may not be able to give sufficient food and educational to his 10 children. With more mouth to feed he may not be able to afford to pay for decent housing or a vehicle for himself. He'll have to wait at least 20 years for some of his children to grow up and to work. And with poor education backgrounds and poor living conditions, likely these children will repeat the same cycle of living in poverty with few improvements in life. If you Indians still believe in having more babies will magically transform India into a big economy, then go ahead and do it.
@Joy No, not immediately. You have to feed the babies for them to grow up and give them education. If too many babies are born, I'm afraid low income families can't afford to feed them, let alone give them education. It takes about 20 years from babyhood to adulthood for them to be able to get into the work force. I'm afraid you can't see the reality but blinded by false assumptions about increasing population = to increased prosperity. That's a stupid reasoning.
Its funny how so many people talking about automation/ AI. AI is not going to take over most of the industries anytime soon. Even if it happens, India still can choose not to automate their factories to create jobs for their population and make cheaper products for their own population to buy and use. Remember India has over a billion population. They can create their own manufacturing ecosystem and can survive with it. We've seen in the past many new jobs were created as humans discovered new technologies. The same might apply for the future. We wouldn't know what kind of new labour jobs that would be created in the future. I dont know why the comments are being too much pessimistic here.
India and China are different countries with different cultures. Population alone only means more mouths to feed. Government planning and people's will to succeed are the main driving forces. Nobody said China is perfect, but the result speaks for itself. Forty years of hard work turn China from a dirt-poor country into a modern society. Especially lift 800 million out of poverty.
The video isnt just about population, its about a population that is getting old, therefore unable to work and require younger generation to feed them. It has nothing to do with poverty, culture or nationality. China might as well be the most efficient government and be the richest in the world, but even the most efficient government cannot force you to have kids, and being rich doesnt stop people from retiring.
@@GGWP-gm5cq The population has everything to do with poverty, culture, and nationality. 1) Poverty - Bad government and wealth distribution (wealth controlled by a small majority of people), India and the United States, for example. 2) Culture and nationality - Most countries retained their own culture and nationality(they don't rely on immigrants to boost their population), except for the United States, Canada, and Australia have relied on immigrants to boost their population (sad to say, their native people's culture is destroyed or nonexistent). The aging population is a problem for the world, but the more populous countries might fare better only with good government and planning. Otherwise, it will become a disaster for themselves and the world.
@@robertwong2218 The United States, Canada, Australia, and The UK have boosted their population by adding citizens to their numbers and it has worked. Most advanced nations do not worry about ethnicity the way the Chinese do who are still very backwards in many respects but the most hilarious thing that you said was the The United States and India have their wealth concentrated among only a few people when China is a much bigger example of wealth concentration than either India or the United States.
@@Zack-fu4lo considering India had a closed economy up until 1991, that's still impressive. Also the fact that India is a democracy and cannot exactly force it's people to not have children may have a lot to contribute to India's lag.
Now that India has the world's most populated country title we need to start focusing on so many things .... We need at least a growth rate of 8 to 9 percent per annum , build infrastructure like the way China did in the 90's and the 2000's also at the same time keep bridging the rich poor gap all these problems are tough .... But I do think India is ready for the challenge we are a vibrant democracy where we are dedicated towards finding new and creative solutions to all our problems unlike China .... So I am very confident of India's future and that if we keep on working hard and innovative we are definitely a force to recon with in the future .... Right now we are very well on the path of becoming one .... 🙂 ....
with this pol1t1cal atmosphere - gdp & global voice may improve. but per capita & standard of living wise - i don’t see much of an improvement. i am not sure on what basis you phrased your prediction - as g0v is spending on unnecessary, ignoring necessary nation building exercises.
Unfortunately peaking didn't happen in Peking, the nightmare for population growth happens when there is ageless reproduction- even if it results in the production of mad and crazy babies
West people and media are talking about India let me tell you something do you have any idea how Indians are running your country. India is largest tractor maker, spices, milk , 2 wheeler,fruit etc and 2nd largest in mobile making, internet users, textile, stil , 3rd largest car producers electricity, Renewal engry and so many things that I can't remember now and don't forget history the number, button, shampoo, youga , navigation system, point , yoga , thorium base energy, ruler , usb, flush toilet , sewage system etc..
You can certainly do a better job at picking shots which are currently full of stereotypical things. There is a crazy diversity and every extreme in India but WSJ seems to be showing only one extreme.
@@TomNook. nope lol. Stop doomering and look at how solor panel prices have fallen. With near free electricity everything change. That's just solor panel. AI will change 10x more than that
Just want to say one thing why all of the westran media is 3-4 decade old photos and videos to represent India while on the other side china as super clean and beautiful. This is totally a racist thing in my opinion. I would say westran doesn't want India to beacome a superpower.
If these young people don't have suitable job opportunities and are idle, then the so-called demographic dividend is nothing more than an additional burden on the government.
Yours and UN's prediction is faulty. India's fertility rate has already been below 2.0 for the last 4 years. The replacement rate to maintain constant population is 2.1. So, India's population is expected to start decreasing 2035 onwards.
Initially I wasn't so enthusiastic about India becoming the largest population,but the way Chinese r irritated, annoyed & panicked seems to be something positive happened & number of videos like this showed that.China has chosen a fierce enemy as India, India is a formidable power,only country which has the capacity to deal/ beat China in long term, & will never allow china to dominate Asia.
@@WalterGao That's why US,is so frustrated on India buying Russian oil, isn't it.India is the only big country ( top 5 eco),which has very good relation ( infact strategic partner) of both USA & Russia,so don't fool urself, India is in no one camp, it's only enemy is & will be China,& will do whatever it takes to deal with it, don't be in any illusion.
Trivia note: The U.S. game show The Amazing Race has been on for 34 Seasons, they have traveled to India for 12 of them (1, 4, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 18, 20, 27, & 32), & they have traveled to China for 9 of them (1, 6, 10, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, & 28).
its crazy that India is 1/3 the size of China and has a greater population. How can you guarantee food/water and energy security when every bit of arable land is already being used. I'd rather be China then India. Issues related to aging population can be alleviated with immigration, raising retirement age, automation of low skill jobs etc. etc. There's not much you can do when you run out of food and don't have full control of your water and energy supplies.
3/4 of China is arid, and 90% of Han Chinese live in 1/3 of the country . Unlike India, even today , so called self declared superpower, communist China , cannot feed its own people and is reliant on food imports from Australia, Japan, Canada, Ukraine , Argentina and USA. China is the largest pork importer in the world . This is why China is losing sleep over a malacca straits blockade. If Tibet secedes, China will lose control over all its potable water 😂😂😂…some fun facts for wumao who are uneducated
Dude we got rivers from the mountain king Himalayas and south India gets its rivers from rainfall only. It's a god given country but was unfortunate from the beginning!
90% of Chinese population live in coastal China (real China) and nearby regions which is of the size of India. The occupied from others regions of China like Tibet, Xinjiang have very small population
Everyone thinking only how people Live in India, but many forget to think about Indian who lives around the world, rule country, lead many big corporations
It will be interesting to see what a 2050 world will look like.. China, India and the US will be the 3 largest economies.. China will most likely be at odds with US and India.. Yuan and Rupee trade will increase significantly, meanwhile dollar trade will decrease percentage wise.. The demographics of each nation will be vastly different from the other..
@@PAPA.PARDESI thats the strategy these folks are not getting we will subtly get in their system built by their forefather when they are fighting with china and whatnot as we indian dont like to put all our eggs in one basket
The video points out that 70% of India’s population lives in rural areas, yet all TV networks rely on that one set of images from a super dense Indian city to represent India.
I don’t know how old clip is this probably from 2000s around some market in Delhi or Mumbai and whenever India comes they show this clip .. crazy
True. But the thing is that cities extract wealth from the villages. Therefore that picture makes sense.
@@gamer-ff6mh Its the very opposite in India. Three of the four largest ministries in India, consumer affairs, agriculture and rural development all transfer tax revenue generated in the cities to India’s villages.
@@gamer-ff6mh false , farming is a tax burden
@@gamer-ff6mh india is an exception. Villages consume more (Welfare schemes)
It kinda feels weird when you realise you wouldn't be there till 2100 to experience all that...😮
2100? My man i am still living in 2020
Maybe I will top 2060 , that's all.
@@archismaanrudra876 good number good number
We will have a nice sleep.
This is our timeline...sadly it is this timeline...that will be most challenging.
But we can enjoy while we r still alive...amid a lot of challenges
I feel weird when I see the 2070 graph people over 65 again and again.
The fact that I am included in that graph somehow makes me feel old and I am just 19.
Weird asf bro. Hope you dont grow up a weirdo
op😊
65 will be 45 in 2070 considering the advancements in health we will make in next 4 decades
Same! Here.
@@imranshaik2282 See man this is what gives me hope. My dream is to live healthy until 2100, and witness all the great achievements of humanity in this century!!!
Just a small suggestion, the footage used of India seems to be many years old, our streets are not always dust filled, with people carrying luggage over their heads and with half broken vehicles on the road. WSJ is a large platform, please do right by the places you cover on the world scale.
It is unfortunate but it is likely on purpose and serves their interest. NYTimes projects India in an even worse manner.
western propaganda wont end i have been seeing it for last 20 yrs, dont expect anything from them
And China like CyberPunk
It's a narrative by western media outlets I see these patterns in all of them
Idk about you but living in Kolkata, this is pretty much a daily scene. You don't have to be in Sealdah station to see this; just drive through Park Circus or Behala. I know what you're trying to say, images such as these perpetuate 'third world' stereotypes of India as still underdeveloped, but we are an overpopulated postcolonial nation with many migrant workers still highly exploited, precarious, and poor, and regardless of whether our middle class throngs malls with shopping bags or our "lower class" on streets with luggage over their heads, the reality is that we are still treating ourselves and each other, performatively, as obedient capitalist workers, slave ants -- and personally, the images of malls seem the most dystopian and depressing.
One way India can do right by its people is by investing heavily in its infrastructure and then relying on businesses (in-house and external) that will care about ethical and humanitarian issues and not be solely driven by profits. But the lack of infrastructure and huge unskilled workforce is no net positive.
Infrastructure is growing now faster compared to other decades(urban transit, expressways,institutions etc) main problem or fear is increasing rate of unemployment which will never solve completely atleast not in near future to defeat unemployment it should grow 18% which is nearly impossible.
@@rishav2205 Wow, well i think if we build infrastructure even faster we would create relatively more employment through contruction itself but also help create an ecosystm for people to create and build more businesses which would create more employment, however the other major issue is the lack of skilled workforce who is able to compete with increasing cost effective technological solutions hence why i say the future employment lies in the effort of ethical and humanitarian driven businesses more.
With the metric you offered makes me think India shuld seriously enact a population control policy because not doing so will only ensure more people will suffer more in coming decades...but maybe im wrong im not aware of all the metrics of the economy on the macro level.
@@KD9-37 yeah we should have more businesses that can generate employment but another positive is happening that many companies are going setup industries in future.
India is already doing that... foreign investment in India has increased as well! India is where China was 10-12 years ago. 50% of India is still living close to poverty line and hopefully these investments will push them away from poverty!
@@DS-vx3wf only 25%
It is asinine that India will have more people than China this decade. Also, this is unrelated, but it really saddens me a lot that in several China vs. India military comparison videos, many YT users support India over China and that so many YT users belittle China and their army. China seems to get way too much hate, while India gets too much support and pride. I can literally list 1K comments that support India and 1K comments that dislike China. I heard words such as "Jai Hind India" and "Support India from Japan". China always seems to carry the burden of hate in many YT videos, very unfair.
mainly cause of the CCP. Also India is seen as the underdog, though I guess not anymore soon as they are one of the fastest developing countries in the world now due to relatively large infusion into infrastructure and pro capitalist reforms. But don’t be sad man, the West also has its own problems and I know as i live here 😂
That’s what listening to sensationalized “free” media does to people. Common sense and fact checking goes out the window because of hate, confirmation bias, etc. I saw a video the other day claiming that India’s new STOBAR carrier was “better” than the new Chinese CATOBAR carrier and the only evidence was “STOBAR carriers are tried and true” lol
That's because China bullies its neighbours. If China wants to counter the US, it needs to have a stable and friendly relationship with its neighbours. When they stop bullying everyone, people's perception may change. Chinese people are nice but half the world hates their government.
what do you expect? UA-cam is banned in China while it isnt banned in India, so of course Indian nationalists are more prevalent than chinese nationalists
It has a lot to do with CCP policies and actions.
If India keeps focus on Infra growth, they would be able to achieve mountains
India has 6 million kilometres of road connectivity and this is more than China’s 5 million kilometres! So we are already leaders in road infra.
@@sridhar.v4855 yes with so much potholes (I'm Indian)
@QRF India has 1 lane to 14 lane highways!
Maj0rity 0f us Inddians still d0nt have access t0 t0ilet
As we can see their higher speed railroad project. Roughly estimate another 20 to 30 years to complete.
Right now i believe India should focus on investing in infrastructure that will boost in connecting the states of India and its economies. The economy of China is extremely connected and even tho they might speak different languages (similar writing script but different pronounciation) they have been able to create a system that is extremely efficient. Once India can fix it's infra problem they can allow the economy to grow even more as now India can supply itself and pay itself and grow it's domestic market while producing goods that might entice the global market.
Which is exactly what's happening, There's been a lot of focus on infra growth for the past few years. I believe it's the right timing.
Just investing Infra is Not enough...there has to be people and businesses (both small n big) to utilise that infra to do more business and for other convenience.
@@Jhonnycomelate social liberalism
Has no much space in Indian thoughts even such words aren't familiar
True
They need to unite there people more
In India most of the graduates from colleges do not have sufficient skills. Majority colleges in India are just diploma producing mills. Also there is lack of quality paid jobs for many leading to a scramble for government jobs. Well off or the smart people take off to western countries for greener pastures. It's not all doom and gloom but that there are many problems which need to be urgently addressed
Deloitte has sent 50,000 professional jobs to India. We call India Region 10.
@@bngr_bngr which country is region 1?
@@farazsyed8264 we used regions to divide the US. But we made up Region 10 so we could transfer expenses to the US. As we didn’t allow India to show a profit.
Flee to foreign nations is a better terminology. Why not educate some kids here? Very few of kids going abroad that I know are smart. They are all there due to financial or social capital. So much so that I rejected my opportunity and decided to stay back and stay back. Maybe I will teach only a thousand kids in my lifetime. So be it. Better that than a meaningless life of hoarding money and handing it over to foreign nations for buying a degree ticket to their jobs
@@bngr_bngr I think India will shift from Information Technology coolie jobs gradually make their own brands or buy the brands from California.
😂😂 it's always fascinating how the western media portrays India and Indian cities with highly dense images of old towns like dude there are more places to show population 😆 as a normal Indian we don't usually see these kinds of crowds or slums like these media houses portray
😂😂😂 looting other and showing poor side i mean its in 2015 footage still they showing this
Don't like it? Then renovate those buildings and areas
@@VeritasVortex They are already been done. They still use such old clips. Even we Indians don't see this India now. It has all changed.
@@d-katsu8931 stop lying. There are thousands areas like this all over India. I would know because I went there a month ago
@@VeritasVortexstop lying ....
There is no way India will ever touch 1.7 billion. The fertility rate of India is now 1.9 in 2023 and is declining at the rate of 7-8% per annum. India's population will peak around 1.6 billion between 2050-2055 and then decline to 900 million by 2100. At the same time, China's population will not be 750 million but somewhere between 500-550 million.
Some sources says that by 2100
India: 1,500,000,000 people
China: 750,000,000 people
Those are just projections and models, could be wrong entirely
True that bro
1.9 fertility rate of India? Where did you get this data from?? It's still more than 2.1.
And not to mention the fact that India has millions of illegal/undocumented immigrants from much more densely populated neighbor Bangladesh, plus Rohingyas. It never seemed they would be deported in future and rather would get regularised here over time and these people have high fertility rates. And, densely populated states like Bihar and eastern UP still maintains fertility rate over 3 even now. So, touching a figure of 1.7 billion seems no unrealistic to me.
Totally fake 2080 India population 2 billion
I'm applying for software jobs and so many positions I see open are hiring people from within India. Would not surprise me if they become a tech superpower (which I guess some people view it as already there, but that's debatable)
Tons of companies hire Indian employees to do lower level jobs. If you have had the chance to work with them, I don’t think you would think this though.
They’re super talented and bright, but they generally will only do exactly as told and don’t propose independent ideas. It can often be frustrating as someone from the US where independent thought and innovation is highly sought after and stressed.
@@ThisDugan I think workplace culture partly plays a role: things are fairly hierarchical, so lower-level employees aren't really encouraged/incentivized to innovate.
India needs to get rid of its lingering caste biases first. There have been countless cases of Indian workers in foreign companies refusing to listen to their manager because the boss comes from a lower caste, or even more egregiously, the manager willingly submitting to being bullied by their underlings due to his inferior social position. That is ridiculous, and must be stamped out.
@@Fishmans huh how when?
@@Fishmans where is this story come from
The way WSG displays India and purposefully choosing stereotypical videos and pictures compared to the Chinese ones feels so weird
wsj is built and run by hippocreates
But the stereotypical clips do portray the ground reality of both countries
@@Jhonnycomelatei don't deny it but could've taken better pics. For example - They chose a crowded market as if that doesn't exist in China but i didnt see any of that in this vid tho
I mean they literally showed pics of a car expo, people outside Louis Vuitton and people working in factory while showing China
But all good we move i guess. These western news outlets will continue to get clowned on even more in the future
I WAS JUST THINKING THAT..... Don't worry. In the coming decades, they won't be able to ignore us
maybe China being 5 times richer than India per person has something to do with it, just saying
Wrong Map of India in Thumbnail. Indian Territory Shown as Chinese.
@蔡English Is that what you are taught in china schools. what about Arunachal Pradesh and Tibet. Taiwan, Hong Kong. Bhutan & South china sea ?
@@caamitinfinite Taiwan u mean republic of china Hong Kong u mean Sar of china tibet u mean province of china south china sea is calimed by all countries not only by china
Fun fact, There was No such a country called "india" before 1947. India was made by British by combining bunch of villages tribes together.
Go study history before arguing.
India existed much before British
Wow ! dude so by this logic , china was not a country before 1900s . As it was spread into so many dynasties during that time.
So that means USA also didnt exist as it is made by combining different states.
Nothing against India but if take into account AI will replace many jobs in the next future and you have a enormous unskilled population this looks like more like burden than a advantage. Just look at Pakistan and Nigeria both surpassed Brazil population but that doesn't mean anything if they don't have proper infrastructure a good system of education and most people live in poverty.
Manufacturing won't be automated or AI ed soon it will take time.
@@pratik6342 Many types of Manufacturing facilities have been automated and will be auto mated.
Just look at the amount of auto mation Car factories have...look at how much they were automated 20 yrs ago and now
@Jio Boy Yea, yet industry needs labor. My point was all can't be automated soon.
@@pratik6342 Well those jobs will just be verification jobs. Like you have the watchman outside the supermarket who stamps on your bill without actually checking properly because the machine is anyways right and it has already verified the goods are proper and nothing is stolen
I work in automation
And believe me no one is gonna replace men for a long time
The only thing AI is gonna do is build things more efficiently ultimately jobs will shift towards service and leisure which is the trend from lst 3 industrial revolution
Is 1.7 billion people even sustainable for India? I think China's current population of around 1.4 billion is already overpopulated, and China has greater landmass.
smaller higher skilled and educated population means a bright future. large unskilled and uneducated population means a miserable future
Means the powerhouse will shift.
China became the factory of the world and so it became rich.
If china's population shrinks people will look elsewhere for cheap labor.
Obviously that is what brings in the money
small rich population doesn't last for long.
If you think that, you probably aren't familiar with chinese history and how large population benefitted it so much that it is standing next to USA
@@sauravyadav6191 it last long for Luxemburg and Switserland
@@arifahmedkhan9999 China is installing more industrial robots than the rest of the world combined. Manufacturing won't leave China. And ChatGPT is rapidly replacing remote service jobs Indian are good at. India's younger generation is doomed.
1. This video just showed the differences between India and China from 1960s to current dates
2. This did not provide any in depth analysis regarding the 'profound effect' of India being the most populous country on the global economy.
3. Use the correct map of India
4. When showing India's population, there are a good number of metropolitans with great levels of urbanization and infrastructure. So WSJ, you might want to portray India's case in a brighter light.
It's always the West creating a 'Vs culture'. They hate someone overtaking them.
using overpopulated streets to portray india is always a thing in western videos, they never change.
True
@@sreetansai pity their ignorance. Reminds me of Dodo.
@@sreetansai Are you suggesting India is not overpopulated ? The population in China the largest is far more dispersed than it is in India. The city western media portrays as being "populated" is not even located in the most populated state. So before whining about unfairness measure up to the claims you make. This pathetic compulsion that forces Indians to lash out at the first instance of our shortcomings being aired (which are real) is most revealing of our pathetic post colonial insecurity. Defend the country when there is a reason to when it's genuinely under threat or misrepresentation not when a mirror is held up to your national image.
The US love to focus on issues China will have in the future, instead of real problem going on in the US today.
If the economic rise and development is guaranteed by the rise of population, then the most densely populated state of Bihar in India would have been more fairly developed instead of being one of the most impoverished states in India.
@Tyt Xlx At the same time, Bihar also need to work on some cultural reforms to check it's fertility rate which is more than 3 and highest in India.
Apart from this, I don't think power sharing should be completely loose free as per the population ratio shared by the states as the equal representation and opportunity of the diverse federal states based on their linguistic and cultural identity needs to be guaranteed to some extent by some mechanism regardless of their population size. Else, smaller distinct states in India would practically loose their voice in the parliament.
That is such a GENIUS observation!👏👏👏
Would never have occurred to the rest of is idiots without your insight!
Thank you very much!
Bihar corruption and gender inequality plays a huge role
Wow what a comment Ashish! You come a long way from your school days.
Its was till 18th century.
“A nation becomes great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they will never get to sit in.”
Come on, fellow Indians! Let’s work hard today to make sure our children and grandchildren enjoy a life of prosperity tomorrow. 🇮🇳
But history tells us that a nation becomes great when it loots the world for a few centuries.
@Tyt Xlx 200 million Indian Muslims should just disappear then? Three hundred years of Mughal rule be swept under the carpet? 😂
@@GM_- While I don’t support a Hindu rashtra per se, it doesn’t mean Muslims will just disappear. Muslims have lived and thrived in Hindu rashtras of India for hundreds of years. You have a misconception about Hinduism.
Dream
The reporter sounds sad while narrating the story
Or maybe tired
Or maybe she is tired that everytime indjan and American media force chinese to compare. even I would feel tired and irritated when people keep forcing me to talk about same topic again and again lol .
Hey WSJ, Thank you for showing India as a one big market street. We Indians never go out without atleast 10k people already on the street. Please we are a developing nation not a poor country
😂😂😂
Tired of this bad rep
They talk about population like it’s wealth! We need low population with higher pay and better living standards
@@JustLazloOfficial
Thank goodness neither of you has had any economics education....
@@JustLazloOfficial and the same is now
Use the correct map in the thumbnail 🤬
Cope and seethe mate.
The declining fertitlity rate is a common symptome of the industrializing process and access to contraception. The one child policy was not a deciding factor in this, but definitely made it worse.
I as an one child policy product think it is great!!! For those people worries about labor force, I think many jobs will be replaced with robots in the near future.
@@zx4337 I doubt it.
As an Indian, I believe it's high time India implements stringent population control. We don't need to be breeding and growing this expanding labor pool for capitalists to exploit. We should be focusing on living well, eating well, developing creatively and technologically while sustainably, and protecting our habitats and homes. India looks dystopian.
@@MrPastaTube1 nah approx 30 million jobs will be replaced by AI in the near future
@@MrPastaTube1 In fact, if the Chinese government did not implement the one-child policy at that time, it would not be able to support so many people under China's leisurely resources. According to relevant calculations, if China had liberalized childbearing, today's China would have 2.6 billion people, which is a terrible figure. No country can support so many people
So India should invest heavily in infrastructure so that companies would relocate manufacturing there creating a lot of jobs. I guess in the next few decades "made in India" will be a thing.
The biggest political push is made in india only. Also in recent budget the capital expenditure increased to 2.5% ( the highest in 75 years ). And is projected to increase as a percentage of budget. We are seeing everyday buildings being constructed. Roads being enlarged. New railway tracks. New airports being inaugurated. The push is much high.
Wow even Mao said that Women are equal Men. Some countries still sadly disagree. Well China had an Empress in its Tang Dynasty.
as equal* ≠ equal
Its the same stock footage of dusty old delhi from 2006
Smh
I'm from India. I don't know anybody who has more than 3 Kids. Normal is 1 - 2. Abnormal is 3. Its the common these days, Gone are days of people having more than 3 Kids, It might have been true in the older generation, Not today.
Probably not the middle class people. There are a tendency that the poor and lower income people tend to have more kids.
From which state?
Lol. What can you expect from a Hindu Rashtra supporter. Totally unaware of reality.
Reason for poor/lower tend to have more than 2 is the thought of
more hands = higher the chances of family coming out of poverty
Mortality Rate (malnutrition) among poor is also an another reason.
only g0v’s can address this issue - can’t blame the poor.
@@gamer-ff6mh typical of any side of biased supporters of anything.
You cannot generalise people
With fast evolving AI, ML, robotics and automation, do WSJ really believe that in 2070, countries would still need young population to manufacture products ?
It's possible because people are basically used as captive markets. Like sheep. You are right that the meaningless jobs will be very high. But the government will find some way of employing. Be it in the army or police or vigilante s etc
Countries will definitely need young people to *CONSUME* products, regardless of who or what makes them.
Massive production will be useless without an equally large consumer base. And consumer bases are what large successful economies are built upon.
@@ArmageddonIsHere Yeah but whole focus of the video is on manufacturing skipping consumption
If you think robots are going to solve everything, you’re mistaken. Real life is not a Hollywood movie.
@@TJSawHistory is evident that every technological revolution is opposed by such logic.
Just because India has a similar population to China, it is not inevitable that India will be as successful as China.
Except in population, the two countries do not have much in common, either in culture & history or physical geography.
China will be China and India will be India.
and here in India Cow is Holy :)
@@hitulsavani and in china pork is tasty
Let's just hope that we humans will be able to eradicate poverty in any part of the world soon, and unite together to not fight for land etc. And will be advancing in becoming borderless world
@@hottube6254 you assumed that i am indian/paki muslim so you wrote that comment! Lol uneducated fella when will you grow people ? Lodu me Gujarati hindu hu , sale likh ne ke liye internet mil gaya to kahi per bhi hag denga ? … sarcasm suna hy kabhi lodu
@@hitulsavani In CCP rule, Uyghurs are holy.
Over all, what that change in India´s population means for EEUU?; it mean there is another country that will surpass EEUU´s Economy by 2028; EEUU will be the third power in the world by that year.
4th, not third.
i am so done with media just selecting random street in some indian village to depict the entire country 😂
Believe it or not most Indian cities are such
@@604h22a what??? You have no idea, this is like taking clips of downtown philadelphia with its rundown apartment complexes with duct taped windows
@@604h22a bruh, I live in Village in India and it's 1000 times better than this☠️
India has quality population. They are young and ready. A peaceful population with enough to eat and survive, educated enough to drive the world and progressing well, and the population will taper by year 2100 to 800 million from current 1400 million. Nothing to worry about INDIA. A democracy and not thrusting outward and believing in assimilation than confrontation, secular and multilingual and multi ethnic etc.
except for the jobs lol
@@mausam760maybe next time study properly?
@@mausam760 In some states like Kerala not even have enough kids in schools, the school I studied had around 1500 kids in the 1970s, now stands at total of 50 kids in eight levels. Many houses are even empty. Not many people for work too.
That’s the wrong Indian map . Colonist
Stop crying.
@@GlitteringAnalyst Mind your own business
"I like how India does have Hundreds of urban metropolitan cities and skyscrapers but still they manage to find out those old footages of slums and overcrowded areas" lol
Like seriously, If you can't find those pictures just ask me, I will give you video's of my neighborhood and workplace at free of cost. Then just watch it with both of your healthy eyes and keep it in your mind until you die that India's infrastructure has grown alot over the past decade....
I love the way how western Media show China financial capital Shanghaito represent Thier country and India oldest city of Banaras to represent my country Hahaha😂😂 this is how they do propaganda against any developing country😂😂😂
Emotional damage control bro😂😂
That's typical. Western media also show footage from Bangladesh overcrowded trains to show world that indian trains are like that.
Western media will always show india like this even after india becomes 3rd largest economy in few years.
Yellow shade on Indian footage and crowded areas always western channels have this footage of India !
we must show them how really india and Indians are
As standard of living improves fertility decreases. When India sees that population living quality it will improve it will see a decline too.
India's government has a traditional policy of resisting and restricting foreign investment.
They see foreign investment as a threat.
I have read that this has decreased. I wonder how much, and if it is enough.
Those r propagandas u have read for political reasons from this same media group. American & Europeans invest where their political & geopolitical interests r. It has nothing to do with any countries policy.
I agree that was the case before but now fdi of India is increasing rapidly every year😊
India's equites was the second best performed stocks in 2022 with FII (foreign investment institutes) holding 20% of them. Make in India policy is actually the opposite of restricting, it's an invitation to investors. The restriction policies, i think, are primarily there to prevent monopoly of foreign investors which destroys local businesses.
You can't blame us. Last time we allowed a Company, it costed us *"45 trillion Pounds being looted from us"* , 250 years of Colonisation , Intense Racism and Partition in 1947.
We are open to foreign investment in most industries
It's not like India's population increase happened overnight. Yes, it's a milestone. But if an increased population had any economic impact, we would have seen its clear effects over the past decade or so in tandem with their population increase. If you have been following the news, they pointed out that AI would replace many jobs in China. Having a larger population would actually worsen the employment situation. Considering the exponential development of tech like AI, countries should be decreasing their population right now, not increasing. It's about timing. India got their timing wrong.
AI and automation can actually ruin a country. Technological advancements were good in the past as it made it more effective in certain fields. But now people will only loose jobs. People will not go for kids in such situations.
In the end a countries progress depends upon the government and tax payers. If there aren't many Tax payers then a country can't grow or do well.
@@afdcg AI will work and pay taxes for humans. We don’t want more people.
India needs to upskill it's young population and invest heavily on development of ecosystem so it can provide adequate jobs to it's young population.... I am really optimistic and hope for the best❤
China still has hundreds of mililons of people in the small villages who are not yet employed in factories. So if the population falls, that will not reduce the labour force.
that makes no sense. the population pyramid takes those 'small villages' into account as well. Its talking about how the country overall is aging, including those small villages.
There is no good future for country like India. At best, it will function as a near stable middle income country & at worst, it will be a civil war like chaos of various fighting groups like caste, religion or language. Caste, religion & language dominate politics. 43% politician in Parliament have criminal records. Even scientists,teachers, doctors etc are selected by caste. And if the best candidate from a caste has marks in negative still he will be selected but that vacant position won't be given to candidate of other caste even if he is scoring 100%. 😂 This is a banana republic.
Go to China
Finally someone speaking sense about the current state of Hindutva RSS Caste infested India
😂😂 same thing was said by Churchill keep dreaming India will rise nd strong
@@RafaySarmad Okay Colonizer
@@preetiraut7700Churchill's exact quote.
"If Independence is granted to India, power will go to the hands of rascals, rogues, freebooters; all Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight amongst themselves for power and India will be lost in political squabbles. A day would come when even air and water would be taxed in India." What is wrong in this statements ? 9th fail will become CM of Bihar. I have already given data of 43% MP's have criminal cases. Others don't have cases doesn't mean they are pure. In many state assemblies, criminals are about 60-70%. We are giving environment cess. So obviously air is also taxed but indirectly still we aren't getting clean air. In 1990's when China was making special economic zones, we were playing mandal kamandal & whole 90's decade was wasted in multiple unstable governments. BJP comes to power in 2014 with ache din promise now their whole politics is about religion and only show off. For example Vande Bharat is a fancy EMU whose average speed is only 88 kmph. Some real work has been done but that's not even being near to what is required.
So the shrinking and ageing population in Japan, Korea, Italy, Taiwan, France are due to one child policy?
France population not thrinking...they birthrate is 1.8 and have many imigrant 😂😂😂
@@ucchau173 That's contributed by immigrants.
In all of this discussion people miss one most important thing to mention ... "the immigration" China may loosen up its policy for immigration. Same way there will be gigantic number of people who will leave India for other countries. I mean this is happening right now, lot of people are leaving India for wester nations where population is plummeting already.
And all the talented India immigrate out. Maybe that is also the problem.
@@achillesarmstrong9639 dude many talented folks are coming back also , life in the west maybe a luxury one but the culture there is hostile , I mean indians are working there for some dollars , they have started coming back to start businesses here.
@@yashvaibhav4207I think that "hostile" would be an exaggeration. There are numerous Indians who are present in Western nations as employees and students who do not face any issues that would be worse than the problems you would face in India. Sure, there are some serious flaws, but we can say the same about our own country (which is what convinces people to leave in the first place).
Just because India’s population looks young it doesn’t mean they’re economically useful. What if the trends point to high youth unemployment in India? Civil unrest? Social discourse. More shift to male gender? What does that mean to India’s population. I urge you to visit and see how labour productivity performs.
If you look at the recent data, India is past that stage. The sex ratio is improving very fast, and economically, India is now at the same stage, China was in the year 2006, i.e. 3.7 Trillion USD. While maintaining a demographic profile, which is the same as what China had in 1991. Also, the Indian government has finally opened up a lot of sectors in the economy for domestic private and international players that were previously closed. At the same time, the US-China rivalry is pushing a lot of export oriented industries into India. India has a solid 50-year window to grow economically on both exports led and consumption led metrics. Indian leadership has to be extremely stupid and incompetent to let this opportunity go.
Brother just wait next decade you will see india massive rise.
India should be given a permanent seat in UN
@tytxlx6503
We will take that so called security seat along with the veto. Write it down if in next 18 months this thing doesn't happen than the existence of both you or UN will cease.
@Tyt Xlx why is Russia UNSC permanent member despite of its stance on Ukraine Crimea?India has been dependent on Russia for military supplies , so that's the reason. India has trusted on some of the countries in the past , but none of them helped it when it's needed the most . Only Russia did !
@Tyt Xlx why u western think that Europe and North America is world
Average analysis
Poor representation
Good points
Use correct map of India. atleast be optimistic in this case.
whats the map timestamp?
Grow up man, it's not India where your govt can do anything to amuse themselves, what WSJ showing is UN approved map...
Seems mostly correct. India dont collect taxes outside those borders.
What do you mean correct map?
That map is ground reality...and they r Not Indian channel...you can't expect them to show India's version of map. They use UN approved map
That clip is like a couple decades old and prolly from a random street market in delhi
Y'all still use it??! Grow up
In twenty years , India pulled 300 million out of UN defined levels of dire poverty, and it did it as a democracy, building consensus , taking people along, it took the tougher but more sustainable path, it did not force sterilise its people or commit forced abortions . A few communist police states also grew richer , by destroying the middle class in the west, making dirt cheap copies of both licensed and pirated goods, stealing copyright, tbieving, anything to make a quick buck and keep its vast hordes employed .This path was tempting for other developing nations, but India stood strong, tall and proud , salute to India, the land the of the light of Asia, Sri Siddhartha Gautama Bauda🙏🏾😘👍🇮🇳
No it's wrong
@@WalterGao i know youre wrong...
India is progressing slowly but significantly, many of the worlds great minds come from there. Shanti shanti mate
@@RonaldinhoGoatthey were born and/or raised here.
Absolutely.
It's just that they rarely stay here.
That's what pisses me off. Not that they leave but that they are forced to do so, that the incentives to stay here is dwarfed by the incentive to leave.
What a load of self comforting excuses and echo chamber propaganda.
China's population may be shrinking but there are still so many people living in rural areas of China. Also one child policy made things worse but Chinese women are more independent in decision making than Western ladies in some ways. So the singles population is increasing. So do you want Chinese women to be more conservative? Western countries will experience the same if they stop immigration. Also there's a very low amount of workers in China as factory workers. The industries are automated nowadays. It's not wise to trust manual labour in the future.
印度是亚洲最强大的国家，中国要向印度学习强国的经验
It should be vice-versa too. Indians like Chinese people.
Let's hope both the g0v's work amicably & solve it's differences.
你怎么能说按照总加速师的说法，中国人可以轻松扛起“二百斤麦子十里山路不换肩"？这绝对意味着所有中国人都是天生的超人。
@@ArghyadeepPal 我们再强大也会跟你们虚心学习的
Foreign cameraman comes to India.
Taxi driver: which city do you want to go to sir?
Cameraman: Either take me to the dirtiest village you know of in India or the most overcrowded place you can find.
😂
that's what fascinates the western tourists. why would someone from Europe, North America or Australia go to India to see fancy buildings and restaurants? xD
Have a reality check
Focus on the number
Losing the humanity
In the 2022 Global Hunger Index, India ranks 107th out of the 121 countries with sufficient data to calculate 2022 GHI scores. With a score of 29.1, India has a level of hunger that is serious.
Lancet study of 2019 said India will peak at 1.6 billion in 2048. UN is still being conservative here. New experts don't even believe 2048 as the peak. I will be surprised even if the peak moves in 2040s.
India is in a growth trajectory for next 15 years, demographics will help with more consumer spending 500 % more from now especially education and gadgets like mobile phones, tablets or whichever is relevant 5G, 6G etc
I don't understand why you use yellow filter for India and blue filter other develod countries. Is anyone know why west media use yellow filter for India
Once AI starts to replace human workers, the young unemployed population will be a disaster
And who will create and maintain the AI? Well people 😂
Nah labour is always cheap.
and at this pace its going to be way sooner for governments to do anything about it
It's not just ai
It's addictive manufacturing
@@tamobiswas6083 it'll be Americans and Chinese... Definitely not much in india
Mosy important guys wsj show our incorrect map which is not acceptable to any Indian they show whole ladakh as China's part . Please correct it
Not to mention that modern pakistan and bangladesh are parts of historical India. And both of these countries are also among the largest population countries in the world. At its peak this century, india, pakistan, and bangladesh could host 1/3 of the earth's population. Thats incredible!
Pakistan's Punjab, India's Punjab and UP-Bihar-Bengal(North India except the himalayan states)and Bangladesh have very fertile soil and can feee its population easily
They have had a large population since the beginning controlling 1/4th of world economy before British arrvived
@@RafaySarmad Maurya empire ka naam suna hai? Gupta empire la naam suna hai? Most of India, paki.punjab and sindh were under them
Even marathas ruled from 1674-1818 over subcontinent😂chutiya
Whenever, Western media talks about India and shows ,rural India from decades back with dusty roads and poverty, I think it's racist.... please put your act together and do proper research before publishing anything...
Is the air and water in India still clean and pure regardless the increase in population and burning of natural resources?
Yes, it is! But, depends on which part of India you are.
@Tyt Xlx Speaking for the cow belt ?
India had 1.4 billion population , we would deliver climate change on ground by EV revolution than west barks at Un
Oo western who is taking about natural resources 😂 don't worry about India worry about Russian
Thumbnail Pe India ka proper MAP use karo
And ye konse India ki report dikha rahe h ye log ?
Despite the current problems facing China because of the One Child Policy, it was arguably still a success. China was poor, it made some gambles, now it is not poor. As a nation, and in the coastal cities, China is now very advanced. Despite its knock-on effects, the demographic dividend is potentially the main reason China is no longer one of the poorest nations on earth, which it was just 50 years ago.
And China will get richer before it get old...if it doesn't participate in any major wars before that ...I hope they dont.
我们的生活压力很大，大到你无法想象，每天都在为明天的生存而工作，虽然获得更多的金钱，但是我们也失去了生活更多的乐趣，因为中国的经济内部竞争非常激烈，不努力明天公司就倒闭了
If people do not exist they do not need to be lifted from poverty
Thumbnail photo is wrong, kindly Correct it with right Map.
Large population = big economy ?
This is really stupid reasoning.
Both China and India have big populations through out the 20th century and yet they lagged far behind Japan and western countries.
It's only when China started to open up the country and reform its economy from 1978, then China's economy started to rise. It continued to rise until China became the second largest economy in the world overtaking Japan and other western countries.
Therefore big population does not magically transform India into a developed country.
@Joy
That's a wrong assumption that per capita income GDP will increase with increasing population.
E. g
The population of 1 million people with per capita income GDP of US $2,000
When the population quickly increased to 2 million, the per capita income GDP does not remain the same, it's going to go down by 1/2 to US $ 1,000 if there's little economic growth.
Furthermore, more babies born does not immediately translate into greater work force. You have to wait until 20 years later that these newly born to grow up and become productive members of the country.
E. g a family man earns US $2,000 yearly. When his wife gives birth to 10 children, it doesn't mean that his family is becoming richer, that his his yearly income will increase 10X to US $20,000 with 10 children. Big family of 10 children is a huge burden to the man with small income. He may not be able to give sufficient food and educational to his 10 children.
With more mouth to feed he may not be able to afford to pay for decent housing or a vehicle for himself.
He'll have to wait at least 20 years for some of his children to grow up and to work. And with poor education backgrounds and poor living conditions, likely these children will repeat the same cycle of living in poverty with few improvements in life.
If you Indians still believe in having more babies will magically transform India into a big economy, then go ahead and do it.
@Joy
No, not immediately.
You have to feed the babies for them to grow up and give them education.
If too many babies are born, I'm afraid low income families can't afford to feed them, let alone give them education.
It takes about 20 years from babyhood to adulthood for them to be able to get into the work force.
I'm afraid you can't see the reality but blinded by false assumptions about increasing population = to increased prosperity.
That's a stupid reasoning.
Its funny how so many people talking about automation/ AI. AI is not going to take over most of the industries anytime soon. Even if it happens, India still can choose not to automate their factories to create jobs for their population and make cheaper products for their own population to buy and use. Remember India has over a billion population. They can create their own manufacturing ecosystem and can survive with it. We've seen in the past many new jobs were created as humans discovered new technologies. The same might apply for the future. We wouldn't know what kind of new labour jobs that would be created in the future. I dont know why the comments are being too much pessimistic here.
India and China are different countries with different cultures. Population alone only means more mouths to feed. Government planning and people's will to succeed are the main driving forces. Nobody said China is perfect, but the result speaks for itself. Forty years of hard work turn China from a dirt-poor country into a modern society. Especially lift 800 million out of poverty.
The video isnt just about population, its about a population that is getting old, therefore unable to work and require younger generation to feed them. It has nothing to do with poverty, culture or nationality.
China might as well be the most efficient government and be the richest in the world, but even the most efficient government cannot force you to have kids, and being rich doesnt stop people from retiring.
@@GGWP-gm5cq The population has everything to do with poverty, culture, and nationality. 1) Poverty - Bad government and wealth distribution (wealth controlled by a small majority of people), India and the United States, for example. 2) Culture and nationality - Most countries retained their own culture and nationality(they don't rely on immigrants to boost their population), except for the United States, Canada, and Australia have relied on immigrants to boost their population (sad to say, their native people's culture is destroyed or nonexistent). The aging population is a problem for the world, but the more populous countries might fare better only with good government and planning. Otherwise, it will become a disaster for themselves and the world.
@@spiritualseeker410bruh, more than a decade behind
@@robertwong2218 The United States, Canada, Australia, and The UK have boosted their population by adding citizens to their numbers and it has worked. Most advanced nations do not worry about ethnicity the way the Chinese do who are still very backwards in many respects but the most hilarious thing that you said was the The United States and India have their wealth concentrated among only a few people when China is a much bigger example of wealth concentration than either India or the United States.
@@Zack-fu4lo considering India had a closed economy up until 1991, that's still impressive. Also the fact that India is a democracy and cannot exactly force it's people to not have children may have a lot to contribute to India's lag.
Show India map properly otherwise it a LEGAL OFFENSE
Now that India has the world's most populated country title we need to start focusing on so many things .... We need at least a growth rate of 8 to 9 percent per annum , build infrastructure like the way China did in the 90's and the 2000's also at the same time keep bridging the rich poor gap all these problems are tough .... But I do think India is ready for the challenge we are a vibrant democracy where we are dedicated towards finding new and creative solutions to all our problems unlike China .... So I am very confident of India's future and that if we keep on working hard and innovative we are definitely a force to recon with in the future .... Right now we are very well on the path of becoming one .... 🙂 ....
with this pol1t1cal atmosphere - gdp & global voice may improve.
but per capita & standard of living wise - i don’t see much of an improvement.
i am not sure on what basis you phrased your prediction
- as g0v is spending on unnecessary, ignoring necessary nation building exercises.
How convenient that WSJ does not have footage of rural China and only Shangai..and for India only the footage of one crowded city..biased journalism
Unfortunately peaking didn't happen in Peking, the nightmare for population growth happens when there is ageless reproduction- even if it results in the production of mad and crazy babies
I see what u did there
show crowded streets while showing india... nicee
India's cultural norms are what prevented it from being in the same boat as china right now
Lol no it's not the culture it's worse education system they are just degree generating machines and also not having quality companies
Hopefully India can become a High-Income Advanced Economy soon :-))
West people and media are talking about India let me tell you something do you have any idea how Indians are running your country. India is largest tractor maker, spices, milk , 2 wheeler,fruit etc and 2nd largest in mobile making, internet users, textile, stil , 3rd largest car producers electricity, Renewal engry and so many things that I can't remember now and don't forget history the number, button, shampoo, youga , navigation system, point , yoga , thorium base energy, ruler , usb, flush toilet , sewage system etc..
China is the leading thorium based energy and USB production. As for the rest.... flush toilets? sewage system? How deluded can you get.
Just being curious
Did you Google it (no offence 🙏🙏)
drop the flask
India HDI index is 132 , UN SDG rank 120 , per capita income is 2100$ compared to china 12000$ ...india lacks basic sanitation and hygiene
@@superjit6190 the fact that u r using 5g is also invented by indian , so keep ur mouth shut, and if u have little sense go serach in Google !
The real problem India is the poverty while Chinese economy is growing inevitably will surpass the US/EU but India will be populated of poor citizens
India is fastest growing country and don't worry about us
You can certainly do a better job at picking shots which are currently full of stereotypical things. There is a crazy diversity and every extreme in India but WSJ seems to be showing only one extreme.
Every Western media does that now. There's a reason china maintains strict control on media in their country
😂 meaningless to compare population with Economic. It's all comes to managing
Proud to be Indian🇮🇳
Map of India in the thumbnail is wrong. Plz correct it.
I agree Kashmir, Khalistan, North East and Tamil Nadu are separate countries and not a part of Lindutva
We have many new tech and abundant food by 2030 so no problem for both nations
we have more clean air, water and the oceans more fish and wildlife and trees in the world with every increase in world population.
its going to be the opposite.
@@TomNook. nope lol. Stop doomering and look at how solor panel prices have fallen. With near free electricity everything change. That's just solor panel. AI will change 10x more than that
Also, update your library of "INDIA" videos to be used. Not the entire nation looks like the clips that you just cant seem to stop using.
Just want to say one thing why all of the westran media is 3-4 decade old photos and videos to represent India while on the other side china as super clean and beautiful.
This is totally a racist thing in my opinion.
I would say westran doesn't want India to beacome a superpower.
Delhi vs Beijing. China is cleaner due to their social credit system, and is most prosperous due to their manufacturing push.
yeah man they not supporting INdia for the beocming of superpower. lets go India
If these young people don't have suitable job opportunities and are idle, then the so-called demographic dividend is nothing more than an additional burden on the government.
FREEDOM FOR ARANACHUL PRADESH FROM INDIAN OCCUPATION
Yours and UN's prediction is faulty. India's fertility rate has already been below 2.0 for the last 4 years. The replacement rate to maintain constant population is 2.1. So, India's population is expected to start decreasing 2035 onwards.
Initially I wasn't so enthusiastic about India becoming the largest population,but the way Chinese r irritated, annoyed & panicked seems to be something positive happened & number of videos like this showed that.China has chosen a fierce enemy as India, India is a formidable power,only country which has the capacity to deal/ beat China in long term, & will never allow china to dominate Asia.
@@Mike-xo1se yeah 1 more toilet for Ur WIFEY
You guys still wearing SECOND HAND camouflages from US ?
@@WalterGao That's why US,is so frustrated on India buying Russian oil, isn't it.India is the only big country ( top 5 eco),which has very good relation ( infact strategic partner) of both USA & Russia,so don't fool urself, India is in no one camp, it's only enemy is & will be China,& will do whatever it takes to deal with it, don't be in any illusion.
Dont forget the useless Russian tanks
Same as the south asia countries will never allow india to dominate south asia region.
I don't hate india at all but they have deep-rooted issues in governance that prevent them from being a developed country.
True
Trivia note: The U.S. game show The Amazing Race has been on for 34 Seasons, they have traveled to India for 12 of them (1, 4, 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 18, 20, 27, & 32), & they have traveled to China for 9 of them (1, 6, 10, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, & 28).
Thank you US game show for visiting India more than China. I will buy Two McDonald's burger so that I can support the American Crime Syndicate.
When peaples get good education birthrate gradually decrease..
its crazy that India is 1/3 the size of China and has a greater population. How can you guarantee food/water and energy security when every bit of arable land is already being used. I'd rather be China then India. Issues related to aging population can be alleviated with immigration, raising retirement age, automation of low skill jobs etc. etc. There's not much you can do when you run out of food and don't have full control of your water and energy supplies.
3/4 of China is arid, and 90% of Han Chinese live in 1/3 of the country . Unlike India, even today , so called self declared superpower, communist China , cannot feed its own people and is reliant on food imports from Australia, Japan, Canada, Ukraine , Argentina and USA. China is the largest pork importer in the world . This is why China is losing sleep over a malacca straits blockade. If Tibet secedes, China will lose control over all its potable water 😂😂😂…some fun facts for wumao who are uneducated
No foreign immigration pls. We already have millions of illegal immigrants and too many people of our own!
Dude we got rivers from the mountain king Himalayas and south India gets its rivers from rainfall only. It's a god given country but was unfortunate from the beginning!
Most of chinese population is near the coastline. Its not as fertile as India.
90% of Chinese population live in coastal China (real China) and nearby regions which is of the size of India. The occupied from others regions of China like Tibet, Xinjiang have very small population
Everyone thinking only how people Live in India, but many forget to think about Indian who lives around the world, rule country, lead many big corporations
It will be interesting to see what a 2050 world will look like.. China, India and the US will be the 3 largest economies.. China will most likely be at odds with US and India.. Yuan and Rupee trade will increase significantly, meanwhile dollar trade will decrease percentage wise.. The demographics of each nation will be vastly different from the other..
My inddia will always remain a 3rd w0rld c0untrry
India will never have a bigger economy then USA, China will surpass US for some time but will eventually fall behind.
What the video doesn't show is the US Population pyramid which is very similar to China's.
did bageshwor dham baba told you this?
not really, China is currently facing the biggest economy crises in past 50 years.
Correct your maps
It means hundreds of millions of cheap labors will be available for developed countries
There will be no more presence of developed countries , india china will dominate everywhere ,
also PM or president for ur country like UK😂😂😂😂
@@PAPA.PARDESI thats the strategy these folks are not getting we will subtly get in their system built by their forefather when they are fighting with china and whatnot as we indian dont like to put all our eggs in one basket