The port mentioned in this video in Croatia has a container terminal being developed and jointly operated by the Danish shipping company A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S.
Which would you prefer: The U.S. ruling the world? Or the country where they're conducting a state-led genocide, welded people into their homes over covid, and prop up North Korea?
China is an adversarial country to all Democracies under Xi’s territorial expansionism. The US is just taking Xi’s threat most seriously and moving strategically now to contain a Chinese imperialist ambition. At least, that’s the way I understand it.
Why doesn’t the US help build ports in other countries? Oh right we can’t build any infrastructure these days. The “contain” not “compete” strategy makes us look very weak
Like the commercial port in Sri Lanka which serves commercial tankers like Type 052D, Type 055 or maybe even in the future some bigger tankes like Type 003 packing some nice containers like J-16?
@@zhongxingjin846 The problem is that they are by no means commercial. People like this guy calls them commercial and yet I don't think Type 052D is a tanker. That's my opinion ofc.
@@napobg6842 Even it's by no means commercial, what's the problem with that? US has hundreds of foreign bases, why can't China has it's oversea military bases?
@@napobg6842 there's no problem with this. It's monitored, it's peaceful, it's legal and it's with money. And mostly, it is fully civil infrastructure. What's the problem, I can't understand
@@noelgenoway9360 China builds ports while the US builds bases. China expands trade and diplomatic relations while the US sanctions one third of sovereign nations. China builds roads, power stations, ports and railways while the US blows up pipelines and shamelessly supplies the ordnance for the slow-walked explosive demolition of a large, inhabited Mediterranean city. The US is losing the great power competition with China. It is losing in front of the entire world while shrieking about how powerful and invincible it is and all the while behaving like an entitled, violent, meth-addicted narcissist. It's painful to be from the west during this moment of history.
Without US China wouldnt be able to trade with you like they do in the first place. WE police the worlds oceans and supply the shipping insurance that makes global trade an option in the first place. Ask the Russians how losing our system has effected them......
Can you imagine China, or any other nation, publicly talking about slowing down the growth of the USA? The shamelessness of United States as a country is jaw dropping. United States one day will learn the hard way that they don't own the world, whether it's China or another nation which will give them that lesson, we will see.
They've literally openly spoken about destroying the United States on their state media channels. You should really look at some of their wolf warrior takes.
The problem that we have with China is that its a neo-fascist dictatorship. The UK willingly allowed the US to become the global hegemon after WW2 because we were democratic and capitalistic. You act like the US has bad diplomacy while every country that surrounds China minus Russia hates their guts.
America needs to protect global shipping lanes from evil countries like China. Meanwhile, what's in the shipping containers? Products from the manufacturing center of the world, and the largest trading nation... China. It's a clown world.
Depends if it’s meant for trade only. The Chinese government runs “police” operations in foreign countries to intimidate opposition figures, while posing as an immigrant assistance organization. But I’d be fine with a permanent military base near my country, since it’s my country’s military base. 1:40 But lemme ask you a question. Would you be fine with a foreign power ownership over your nations trade ports, with the ability to use it against you if needed? How would that be much different than a permanent military base? 3:13 Huawei has been banned due to fears of espionage
@@jtgd Fears of Espionage, no evidence . Google facebook all caught spying for NSA fact: You will be fine with american rapist running around? ask okinawa they dont want the bases there due to all the crimes that these bases bring . You wont mind being Colonised? so curious You can take back the port by law , are you going to war to take back that military base with the United states? What a poor Argument.
@@hamzamahmood9565 thats due to the South China Sea Dispute . They are getting out muscled there but since their new president is the Son of the Last Dictator that the United states Installed i would say there is about right.
This is disingenous of the narrator, there are only a few ports that chinese military visit (in a blue moon) as they don't roam around the seven seas like the US.
How about the military bases absolutely surrounding China and they are worried about 1 port on the Atlantic? The US dollar is literally a security risk to the rest of the planet.
I love it when the US compares Chinese commercial ports with zero military presence, with US military bases and outposts with full on vehicles and armed troops.
I think you are too uneducated on the topic to express any kind of opinions. Just look at what happened to the same port that China took and started putting naval ships there.
@@Omer1996E.C That's a problem you think the same as it means that you are not aware of the Chinese practices. In the same ports China is putting naval vessels. For example in one "commerical" port in Sri Lanka which China took for 100 years. They are not putting their ships like Type 052D instead of tankers or container ships.
China has built an entire roads network in my country Kenya while the US has built nothing in Africa not even a pit latrine yet they want Africans stop doing business with China...Kenya has one of the fastest internet in the world thanks to technology from Huawei
Oh no the free market!! How dare the the Chinese help developing nations integrate better with the global economy😡. You should work with the US instead. What was that? You want a commercial port? Sorry best we can do is a military base.
Chinese run ports are also insanely efficient. With 5G networks, they've reached 90-100% automation, including working 24/7 with no night time lights needed. These ports are up to 4x more efficient than in the US. This is a natuonal security threat because it makes the US look incompetent by comparison
when did america a good guy last time......? when china's xi arranged talk with zelensky, US told ukraine it was not the time for ceasefire or peace talk.....
China is the threat here, Russia and its atrocieties in Ukraine is the best and the latest example of that, all authoritarian regimes are the global threat, they almsot spread their atrocities beyond their own borders when they gain more global power. jsut iamgaine if there was no US global military presence, what would Putler do to Ukraine and other nations, the same is ture with Xitler and China.
US is extending Not Influence but Exploitation and Robbing of foreign countries of its resources that's why US has built over 1200 military bases All Ok very The World🌎!!
Helping? You mean give billions and billions for infrastructure project by using its own workforce while refusing to not any hiring locals and using cheap materials for these project. Later the nation who got its billions of loan from cannot pay its debt so China decides to take that project, port, or portion of land for 99 years for chinese interest? You call that helping? No wonder you chinese suck.
This video highlights the two vastly different philosophies to nation building. The US builds military bases, 760 of them, and more on the way, while China builds ports to move goods around the world. The US's priority is to dominate the world via military presence, while China attempts to dominate the world's commerce. The choice is stark. For the west, they have chosen the US for the fear of an Asian country dominating them. Mind you, they were once dominating Asia, and they were rather comfortable with that. For "the rest" of the world, ie. the developing and non western allied world, they chose China, because their national interests don't collide with China's. They wanted goods to be traded between themselves and the rest of the world, and sea transportation is much preferable because it is cheaper. So Chinese's ambition doesn't impinge those non-western nations' interest, but rather enhancing it. That of course won't be agreeable with the US because those "the rest" of the world are voting with their feet, and picked China instead of the US. So what can the US do? Well, there are many if past records are anything to go by. (1). Sanctions (2). Talk up the Chinese threats (3). Block and threaten any country which dare to disobey America's directives. (4). Build more military bases. But money doesn't grow on trees. For the US, money does grow out of printers, and of course selling more bonds, meaning borrowing. Ironically, China is one of the US's major creditors. So China lends money to the US to build more military bases to encircle itself. It makes zero sense. Meanwhile, US politicians are arguing if they should borrow even more in order to pay the interest and to pay for the military which boost the US's mojo.
Great comment. I believe China continues to loan money because they know the US is getting close to a hyper inflationary collapse. Rendering all those military bases useless. Idk.
Not exactly, you should do some research on who or which county has been protecting the WORLD sea trade lanes for decades allowing for unhindered trade or globalization. Who invited the CCP into the WTO literally championing them as a world manufacturer? That is a very naive or better yet simple way of looking at it. You seem to being missing the some points, China is literally benefitting from all "bad" bases the US has built for a reason and have been for decades. This is the world we live in, people watch UA-cam, soak up the propaganda they like and comment away without thought or understanding.
Where do you get the moral high ground to appeal to governments worldwide to not allow the Chinese to build commercial ports ? when you have MILITARY bases all over the world. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever..
@@kameraldbahrul3432 Who would you like to run the world? The country that mows down its own college kids with tanks that literally NO country in the world trusts due to its constant lying? Really?
You havr it all wrong. It's not the moral high ground speaking, it's the bully speaking there . He has a military base right at your door step . You do as he says , or ........ 🤷♂️
Frankly, I trust China more than the US when it comes to building ports around the world, regardless if it's military or commercial. China doesn't go to war all around the globe, the US does.
4:10 If it creates more jobs and improves the output of those countries......then it's good. the US shouldn't force its allies to do something that they don't want or it will ruin the alliance and the friendship
here is a solution, instead of trying to destroy what others have built try becoming more industrious your self and built foreign ports. the best revenge is to improve your self.
Its good for weapon sales, and getting countries so depended on you. They have being doing it for years. One big weapon sales man. Create a problem...sell a solution. The fact 90% of the worlds population cant connect the dots is amazing.
The US is interested in weakening other countries and gaining access to resources while creating poverty. China is coming to invest and has uplifted millions of Africans from poverty....Thanks to China my country Kenya now has paved roads everywhere in the country and a high speed Rail line.,,China is also building a brand new port in Kenya called Port of Lamu which is almost complete.
I see the point with the US trying to influence port investments. However, if China tried to do the same there would be uproar. I respect the US, but feel they do not see how it’s foreign policy can provoke other countries and drive them to partner against the west. Ex. Russia and China
West Companies are colonial tool to enrich themselves not undeveloped large or warm country. I hate them, invent patent, trade secret for always and always having edge on technologies.
@@gokulkrishna4011 they cant gain profits from building military bases, China expanding their busines by developing railways, ports, road, airports to other countries whilebthe US busy expanding military bases and worrying Chinas success.
@@gokulkrishna4011 You are correct, that what the U S has been doing for years around the world, currently they are looting crude oil from Syria and Iraq.
It's weird that US capital has so little interest in manufacturing and infrastructure but are willing to throw copious amounts of cash in venture capital investments that haven't had a profitable year on their books.
It is the fallacy of financial realism. Too many American actually believe money has intrinsic value, rather than just representing a claim on resources and capacity. China can make stuff, and America has piles of digital paper representations of claims that canot be enforced.
The financial rate of return is far greater than that of physical enterprises, because physical enterprises have to solve problems such as production, export and management, and the cost and operation are huge
Can somebody explain how Chinese companies owning a port in the EU or US could possibly be a threat or the host country not take over their operation and nationalise the ports in case of emergency? If they want to own a port fine, but they can't shut it down or make us refuel their military ships. This seems overly dramatic.
As a Myanmar we welcome Chinese ports since US or EU isn't investing in our country. If China wants warships dock there, we fine with that too since US won't invest
@@joemosely9383, Then you tell me how China could possibly make Germany refuel their warships or close down those ports in retaliation? Most planes in Russia are leased from Western companies, so after the invasion, they just kept them rather than giving them back. The ports would be no different.
China doesn’t have weapon billionaires. It doesn’t engage in businesses of coups, colour revolutions, interventions, or wars. It doesn’t need military bases to do business. Recently China earned status of the happiest country, 91% feeling satisfied and happy, 94% public approval for the government, i.e, very successful democracy. China has built the world’s largest public education, healthcare and social security. It has built new infrastructures, transportation, social and cultural facilities all over with conveniences of digital technologies, i.e high level of human rights. It doesn’t have freedom of shootings, opioids, ganglands, homeless, hunger, lie or being lied upon.
Solar panel costs are low because of China not USA. CATL worlds largest battery manufacturer. From EV batteries to Grid storage batteries. China sees the future more than the USA.
@@k.k.c8670 Whats wrong with deep sea port? What makes you think deep sea port must be used for warship and not be used for trade? if i am host country, i prefer a deep sea port which can help bring in large cargo ship or oil tanker for large trade activities and not shallow port for fishing. If those Chinese can handle and manage the port well, i dont see any problem as long as it follows local law and can bring in trade. Only those people who are suspicious of China will think these ports are solely for warship. I guess those USA licker will think 800 military bases around the world is for peace keeping and not for advance US war interest . 🤣
@@entertainmentjoke2871 I think you misread my intention. Nothing wrong for China to turn some of their commercial ports to naval bases if need be and the host countries are agreeable. After all, the US has 800 of them.
Yeah right ... USA is the *_fake_* beacon of -serfdom- freedom, -despair- hope and -darkness- light for the world ! The USA invert reality & facts and expect the world to believe them.😂 Only one direction for them - the way of the Roman empire ...
Paranoia over fair competition. The US's militarization would consider toilet paper as a 'National Security' issue since it's used by them and shortages would impede their defence.
China largest importer especially South America and Africa. Building ports and supplying infrastructure help. China very proactive vs reactive with lithium, rare earth metals, nickel, copper, etc. most worlds refining of raw metals completed in China. Amazing from rice paddies to superpower in only 60 years. A force to be reckoned with.
May I know why that is a concern? Building and operating seems not the same as owning the port? Can they allow military activities without approval, no?
It seems that the message is: for the US politicians to feel safe several neighbours, that are as distant as in Africa, are not allowed to have proper infrastructure vital for their development. If we generalize this idea and allow all countries to be equally entitled to feel safe, then we would go back to become hunters and gatherers.
Yeah, the Chinese are not paranoia, racing to build up their military & stealing technology. China is paranoid of a Democratic Island that wants to be free, independent and recognized by the International Community.
Your spies don't like getting caught do they? How about don't spy and develop your own tech instead. Can't even develop a decent covid vaccine. Pathetic.
I think United States could have easily been the leader in commerce and exert real influence through trade instead of spreading military bases that have little real world value and influence on people’s lives
The US pressures Equatorial Guinea not to accept the Chinese built port, but is incapable of offering a competing bid for the port. Essentially, they want the country to commit economic suicide for no good reason. Absurd.
This propaganda is pure projection. The US has c. 800 foreign military bases; China has ONE. But in its new cold war, Washington is obsessed with trying to crush Beijing economically, so it cynically portrays its trade relations as "national security threats". Ironically, the talking head this video interviewed admitted at 1:16 that China's strategic motivations "are fundamentally defensive" -- but then the rest of the video is warmongering propaganda about the Yellow Peril.
China builds ports, US and NATO build military bases. US has over 800 military based to project force and submitt others by force. Chinese are not the best but they are a thousand times more human the western colonialists.
it's fine when the US doesn't allow China's investments and cranes. but when it asks other countries not to do so, it is disgraceful. and i think if the US thinks China's crane is threat to national security, just don't use it. buy domestic made crane. these days, american people have seen too much media coverage about this thing. we just don't understand why it is difficult to replace these cranes. the government and media are all talking and zero action.
USA is NOT concerned about the Chinese NAVY, they are concerned about Developing Nations growing their economies and improving their living standards via economic cooperation with China.
0:09 meanwhile, the United States owns 700 military bases all over the world, including in poor countries where their presence has significantly reduced the long-term political security of the entire region (especially in Africa). So many countries are vulnerable to the US
China is involved in 95 ports worldwide for trade. The U.S. operates 800 plus military bases worldwide producing noting but a big eater of the U.S. tax revenue.
The US: literally tries to encircle China with military bases in Japan SK the Philippines Also the US: oh no Equatorial Guinea is too close to the US to have a Chinese port of any sort 😂
24.9% means china has no voting rights when it comes to that one terminal. So they cannot influence anything happening on it... Btw Hamburg has 42 terminals in total.
Why does US can’t live in harmonical cooperation with the rest of the world? Why does everything with the US has to be about violent threats? I’m sick of it!
China is the world's biggest trade partner after all, they need these ports. And if they control these ports, the more they can make efficient and modernize these ports to suit the need and demand of these ports.
Before China Tianjin port required close to 8 hours to load/unload a container ship. Currently its only take 45 minutes to complete the tasks with Huawei autonomous systems.
This is such nonsense! As usual, to understand U.S. posturing, simply "Follow the Money." The US military is not only large enough to eviscerate China's, it is large enough to take on and defeat the remaining global military balance were they all to unite against the US. As more and more countries catch on to the US MIC's profit-driven intentions (Military-Industrial Complex), the plausibility of a global conflict becomes ever more likely.
Yes, but a concern is that MCI munitions production stock is low due to the Ukraine, so if a 2nd or 3rd front emerges there may be serious initial problems.
The port mentioned in this video in Croatia has a container terminal being developed and jointly operated by the Danish shipping company A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S.
@maxxxielorenzo2345
😂
@@HollywoodCanik go sit in the corner. you're on time out
America 🇺🇲: building a military base to suppress other countries.
China 🇨🇳: builds ports to grow other countries' economies
@@HollywoodCanik When you are ready, enroll yourself in an adult English class. You do need some remedial work in your communication.
WSJ just check the comments no one is falling for this anti China propaganda. Y'all need a new strategy. 🤣
Only USA can build military bases everywhere while no other countries are allowed to own stakes of commercial ports. It’s the best US exceptionalism.
Absolutely rights
US dictatorship. The real dictator and terrorist
they're insecure, because they have to increase the ceiling every 24 months while china have hundred billion dollars trade surplus
other countries are fine to own commercial ports outside their borders, but China is an enemy.
Which would you prefer: The U.S. ruling the world? Or the country where they're conducting a state-led genocide, welded people into their homes over covid, and prop up North Korea?
China: 95 commercial ports.
US: 750 military bases.
Nothing more to add jury.
You've raised your case, hands down
they are two different ways of excerting power aboard
Must *Sino* establish Police in *State* for you to Realize? *Oh* *they* *already* *did* *AHAHAHAHAHAHA*
@@santymartin7383 only ONE away if you are a yank, And that’s guns ! Lol
800 military bases 313 of them are surrounding China.
This reporting sounds like America owns the world and is entitled to it.
Looks like it's China who is trying to own the world. Is that what we want?
They do this alot .
China is an adversarial country to all Democracies under Xi’s territorial expansionism. The US is just taking Xi’s threat most seriously and moving strategically now to contain a Chinese imperialist ambition.
At least, that’s the way I understand it.
china should own the world?
@@AL-lh2ht China bought different properties using US dollars.
Why doesn’t the US help build ports in other countries? Oh right we can’t build any infrastructure these days. The “contain” not “compete” strategy makes us look very weak
Why US need to build ports when she already holds 800 military bases....
The US spent trillions in Afghanistan and Iraq. and guess how many roads, ports, hospitals they built?
The US can't compete or cooperate, it can only seek to contain. They're stuck in the cold war.
@@darrenz6067 lol
Ok trump…
China is building commercial ports and the United States is building military bases.
Like the commercial port in Sri Lanka which serves commercial tankers like Type 052D, Type 055 or maybe even in the future some bigger tankes like Type 003 packing some nice containers like J-16?
@@napobg6842 What's the problem with that?
@@zhongxingjin846 The problem is that they are by no means commercial. People like this guy calls them commercial and yet I don't think Type 052D is a tanker. That's my opinion ofc.
@@napobg6842 Even it's by no means commercial, what's the problem with that? US has hundreds of foreign bases, why can't China has it's oversea military bases?
@@napobg6842 there's no problem with this. It's monitored, it's peaceful, it's legal and it's with money. And mostly, it is fully civil infrastructure. What's the problem, I can't understand
when chinese come they talk about business and comerce. when american come they talk about chinese
😂😂😂 so true
Ya not! China talks about changing the world order!
@@noelgenoway9360 through business and commerce. His point stands.
@@noelgenoway9360 China doesn`t want to live under the American boot. How evil of them. The nerve!
@@noelgenoway9360
China builds ports while the US builds bases.
China expands trade and diplomatic relations while the US sanctions one third of sovereign nations.
China builds roads, power stations, ports and railways while the US blows up pipelines and shamelessly supplies the ordnance for the slow-walked explosive demolition of a large, inhabited Mediterranean city.
The US is losing the great power competition with China.
It is losing in front of the entire world while shrieking about how powerful and invincible it is and all the while behaving like an entitled, violent, meth-addicted narcissist.
It's painful to be from the west during this moment of history.
One is helping people to live better while the other is trying to stop them from helping those that needs help…
China is an evil dictatorship bent on ruling the world.
No to China!
Without US China wouldnt be able to trade with you like they do in the first place. WE police the worlds oceans and supply the shipping insurance that makes global trade an option in the first place. Ask the Russians how losing our system has effected them......
You wanna live a controlled life in a dictatorship like China?
good point
Yeah, china should be stopped
Can you imagine China, or any other nation, publicly talking about slowing down the growth of the USA? The shamelessness of United States as a country is jaw dropping. United States one day will learn the hard way that they don't own the world, whether it's China or another nation which will give them that lesson, we will see.
Uhh China and Russia are non democratic nations of course we must do everything we can to reduce their influence around the world!
They've literally openly spoken about destroying the United States on their state media channels. You should really look at some of their wolf warrior takes.
The problem that we have with China is that its a neo-fascist dictatorship. The UK willingly allowed the US to become the global hegemon after WW2 because we were democratic and capitalistic. You act like the US has bad diplomacy while every country that surrounds China minus Russia hates their guts.
well said
Well once the CCP starts bullying these smaller countries or these ports then they wanna call the United States for help
They are the biggest exporters so they need ports of course.
Exactly this is silliest video ever
America needs to protect global shipping lanes from evil countries like China.
Meanwhile, what's in the shipping containers? Products from the manufacturing center of the world, and the largest trading nation... China.
It's a clown world.
I have a serious question. Which would you rather have in your country? Permanent military bases or permanent trade ports?
Depends if it’s meant for trade only.
The Chinese government runs “police” operations in foreign countries to intimidate opposition figures, while posing as an immigrant assistance organization.
But I’d be fine with a permanent military base near my country, since it’s my country’s military base.
1:40
But lemme ask you a question.
Would you be fine with a foreign power ownership over your nations trade ports, with the ability to use it against you if needed?
How would that be much different than a permanent military base?
3:13 Huawei has been banned due to fears of espionage
Apparently Philippines is asking for permanent military bases over trade ports
@@jtgd Fears of Espionage, no evidence . Google facebook all caught spying for NSA fact:
You will be fine with american rapist running around? ask okinawa they dont want the bases there due to all the crimes that these bases bring .
You wont mind being Colonised? so curious
You can take back the port by law , are you going to war to take back that military base with the United states? What a poor Argument.
@@hamzamahmood9565 thats due to the South China Sea Dispute . They are getting out muscled there but since their new president is the Son of the Last Dictator that the United states Installed i would say there is about right.
Things are not always as they seem.
Chinese ports: posing significant military risks;
American military bases: completely peaceful
This is disingenous of the narrator, there are only a few ports that chinese military visit (in a blue moon) as they don't roam around the seven seas like the US.
Tf is a spy cargo cranes ?
#Chinathing 😊
@@rap3208last time I checked. That was the Us's job too do and they are their at the request of countries not to be there for fun 🤣
Are you. Provokatif. Then you
" Losers focus on winners, winners focus on winning. " ✌️
So true
How about the military bases absolutely surrounding China and they are worried about 1 port on the Atlantic? The US dollar is literally a security risk to the rest of the planet.
What a stupid comment lol.
Now you are being so politically incorrect.
@@rividizd only to americans
I love it when the US compares Chinese commercial ports with zero military presence, with US military bases and outposts with full on vehicles and armed troops.
I think you are too uneducated on the topic to express any kind of opinions. Just look at what happened to the same port that China took and started putting naval ships there.
Lol, that's what I was thinking about
@@Omer1996E.C That's a problem you think the same as it means that you are not aware of the Chinese practices. In the same ports China is putting naval vessels. For example in one "commerical" port in Sri Lanka which China took for 100 years. They are not putting their ships like Type 052D instead of tankers or container ships.
@@napobg6842 proof?
@@tofuyam7361 You don't have internet or something?
People should have more concern of U.S bases around rather than Chinese commercial ports overseas
Agreed mcdonalds bad. Bat meat soup good
@@Myanmartiger921 enjoy your routine mass shooting ceremonies everyday.
China has built an entire roads network in my country Kenya while the US has built nothing in Africa not even a pit latrine yet they want Africans stop doing business with China...Kenya has one of the fastest internet in the world thanks to technology from Huawei
@@Myanmartiger921still better than cancerous McD
@@jarednovel Hope it's worth it to lose agency over your own country. Enjoy your "strings attached" deal with the devil. Don't say we didn't warn you.
Oh no the free market!! How dare the the Chinese help developing nations integrate better with the global economy😡. You should work with the US instead. What was that? You want a commercial port? Sorry best we can do is a military base.
Lol
Free market? Hahaha yes according to the cry babies hans that ban trade when a covid orgin investigation is launched
A commercial port can facilitate the flow of people and logistics, driving economic development.
Yeah ironic that US have overseas base numbered 800 and its justified
Chinese run ports are also insanely efficient.
With 5G networks, they've reached 90-100% automation, including working 24/7 with no night time lights needed.
These ports are up to 4x more efficient than in the US.
This is a natuonal security threat because it makes the US look incompetent by comparison
It is incompetent/////
中国用人工的时候他们说侵犯人权劳工，智能化后他说你窃取信息😄
@@嘿嘿-z3i 总之就是见不得我们好🤓
American’s 5G is a joke. They even worried about Huawei. Plus American takes forever to build something.
Source?
Is this a follow up to that other WSJ video where they tried to compare Chinese ports to 800 US military bases as if they were the same thing?
out of the 800 military bases, which host country did not ask for the base on its territory, which country wants the base removed ?
@@joemosely9383 Japan.
@@joemosely9383middle east
@@joemosely9383The respective governments are afraid of US. Regime change, sanctions come in their mind.
@@joemosely9383 Syria. Everyday. Cuba, too. Stop pretending 'Merica benevolent state.
I feel like every video that's put out comparing US military bases with Chinese commercial ports just makes the US look like the bad guys.
But america is the bad guy isnt it?
when did america a good guy last time......?
when china's xi arranged talk with zelensky, US told ukraine it was not the time for ceasefire or peace talk.....
Actualy they are. We Lie, We Cheat and We Steal.
US is a bad guy.
but they are
While China is busy building ports for commerce, the USA build overseas military bases, who's the threat to global security here?
China is the threat here, Russia and its atrocieties in Ukraine is the best and the latest example of that, all authoritarian regimes are the global threat, they almsot spread their atrocities beyond their own borders when they gain more global power. jsut iamgaine if there was no US global military presence, what would Putler do to Ukraine and other nations, the same is ture with Xitler and China.
China. Under US hegemony, the world has been peaceful
Both
@@CarsonSingclere even a kindergarten kids will laugh at your stupidity
china, clearly, whatever it is that you think.
America 🇺🇲: building a military base to suppress other countries.
China 🇨🇳: builds ports to grow other countries' economies
I would pick America anyday. I would like to supress countries economic potential and maintain the absolute hegemon.
@@marktrinidad7650 History has shown us that no empire last forever
@@moctezuma1341 Yeah, back then Rome, yesterday UK, now US.
Sure we can see how china helped grow economies of Sri Lanka and Pakistan
@@marktrinidad7650so you choose terrorism over peace. typical US shill i see.
USA: Military bases with no ROI whatsoever and heading into a national default.
You are absolutely correct !
Most military objects have no ROI until you really really need them.
China: Dictatorship with current genocide in their country
Completely different means of exerting/extending influence. Economics vs Military presence.
Yes. Most people don't seem to understand that the US calls itself a democracy, but runs the world via a military dictatorship.
US is extending Not Influence but Exploitation and Robbing of foreign countries of its resources that's why US has built over 1200 military bases All Ok very The World🌎!!
@@nimadarabi2 History have shown us the result in the Punic Wars. In the end, the one with the bigger gun, win.
@@zhiweikoh4259 and people still believe the world is ruled by order and rule of law
@@zhiweikoh4259 China has world's largest navy and still rapidly expanding.
Instead of “counter”, why not “corporate” to make the world a better & friendlier place?
this is the US mentality, which is sick
Instead of democracy losing why not bomb the countries. 25% of all countries bomb by USA, 75% of the world rebuild by china.
USA is a bit jealous of China helping other countries.
Helping? You mean give billions and billions for infrastructure project by using its own workforce while refusing to not any hiring locals and using cheap materials for these project. Later the nation who got its billions of loan from cannot pay its debt so China decides to take that project, port, or portion of land for 99 years for chinese interest? You call that helping? No wonder you chinese suck.
Chinese operated ports are among the most efficient in the world, whereas US ports are among the least efficient
who needs port when you can just bomb and steal?
efficient because there are not labor laws.
Why cannot be both? Countries should run their assets with efficiency
This video highlights the two vastly different philosophies to nation building. The US builds military bases, 760 of them, and more on the way, while China builds ports to move goods around the world.
The US's priority is to dominate the world via military presence, while China attempts to dominate the world's commerce. The choice is stark. For the west, they have chosen the US for the fear of an Asian country dominating them. Mind you, they were once dominating Asia, and they were rather comfortable with that.
For "the rest" of the world, ie. the developing and non western allied world, they chose China, because their national interests don't collide with China's. They wanted goods to be traded between themselves and the rest of the world, and sea transportation is much preferable because it is cheaper. So Chinese's ambition doesn't impinge those non-western nations' interest, but rather enhancing it.
That of course won't be agreeable with the US because those "the rest" of the world are voting with their feet, and picked China instead of the US. So what can the US do? Well, there are many if past records are anything to go by.
(1). Sanctions
(2). Talk up the Chinese threats
(3). Block and threaten any country which dare to disobey America's directives.
(4). Build more military bases.
But money doesn't grow on trees. For the US, money does grow out of printers, and of course selling more bonds, meaning borrowing. Ironically, China is one of the US's major creditors. So China lends money to the US to build more military bases to encircle itself. It makes zero sense. Meanwhile, US politicians are arguing if they should borrow even more in order to pay the interest and to pay for the military which boost the US's mojo.
Great comment. I believe China continues to loan money because they know the US is getting close to a hyper inflationary collapse. Rendering all those military bases useless. Idk.
Well said
If it came to war, the US just wouldn’t pay them back, and if anything Japan and our own social security are our biggest creditors.
Not exactly, you should do some research on who or which county has been protecting the WORLD sea trade lanes for decades allowing for unhindered trade or globalization. Who invited the CCP into the WTO literally championing them as a world manufacturer? That is a very naive or better yet simple way of looking at it. You seem to being missing the some points, China is literally benefitting from all "bad" bases the US has built for a reason and have been for decades. This is the world we live in, people watch UA-cam, soak up the propaganda they like and comment away without thought or understanding.
Finally a smart one that knows what these Americans are up to.
Where do you get the moral high ground to appeal to governments worldwide to not allow the Chinese to build commercial ports ? when you have MILITARY bases all over the world. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever..
Its simplw
US exceptionalism
they think we're dumb, it's so obvious this is just another anti china propaganda bs
Us good china evil the white man is crazy 😅😅😅
@@kameraldbahrul3432 Who would you like to run the world? The country that mows down its own college kids with tanks that literally NO country in the world trusts due to its constant lying? Really?
You havr it all wrong.
It's not the moral high ground speaking, it's the bully speaking there .
He has a military base right at your door step . You do as he says , or ........ 🤷♂️
Frankly, I trust China more than the US when it comes to building ports around the world, regardless if it's military or commercial. China doesn't go to war all around the globe, the US does.
China's massively ramping up their military spending, so looks like they want to change that.
China operates civilian commercial ports abroad, the US operates military bases abroad. This sets the tone of each country's character.
The U.S. has about 750 overseas military bases in more than 80 countries.
And why is that? Do you know anything about history?
I think they should add some or many more..
4:10 If it creates more jobs and improves the output of those countries......then it's good. the US shouldn't force its allies to do something that they don't want or it will ruin the alliance and the friendship
These ports could already be in "friendly hands" If the US was more friendly with China. Maybe work on that?
😂
here is a solution, instead of trying to destroy what others have built try becoming more industrious your self and built foreign ports.
the best revenge is to improve your self.
True but wisdom can't be taught to savage war mongers. They must experience their decline first hand to learn.
America’s constant fear and threat of what other countries “could or might do” is nauseating.
亏心事做多的人最怕遇到鬼敲门了
Its good for weapon sales, and getting countries so depended on you. They have being doing it for years. One big weapon sales man. Create a problem...sell a solution. The fact 90% of the worlds population cant connect the dots is amazing.
Wow... USA is actually scared of real Competition 😂😂😂. They don't like to see another nation going over them especially an Asian nation
ok wumao
US Military have 800 military bases in more than 70 countries and we still afraid of these China ports? 😂
Just convert their naval base to port
National Security! 😂
The US is interested in weakening other countries and gaining access to resources while creating poverty. China is coming to invest and has uplifted millions of Africans from poverty....Thanks to China my country Kenya now has paved roads everywhere in the country and a high speed Rail line.,,China is also building a brand new port in Kenya called Port of Lamu which is almost complete.
it's called strategic thinking. Foreseeing potential threats building up.
@@joemosely9383its fine but stop double standard first
I see the point with the US trying to influence port investments. However, if China tried to do the same there would be uproar.
I respect the US, but feel they do not see how it’s foreign policy can provoke other countries and drive them to partner against the west.
Ex. Russia and China
West Companies are colonial tool to enrich themselves not undeveloped large or warm country.
I hate them, invent patent, trade secret for always and always having edge on technologies.
China is bulding ports and buying ports around the world while the U S is building miliatry bases around the world.
Military bases can take out ports
@@gokulkrishna4011 they cant gain profits from building military bases, China expanding their busines by developing railways, ports, road, airports to other countries whilebthe US busy expanding military bases and worrying Chinas success.
@@ruztomjohntamayo9262 Those military base can be used to loot
@@gokulkrishna4011 just like what happened in Syria , US stealing 66,000 barrels of oil daily.
@@gokulkrishna4011 You are correct, that what the U S has been doing for years around the world, currently they are looting crude oil from Syria and Iraq.
It's weird that US capital has so little interest in manufacturing and infrastructure but are willing to throw copious amounts of cash in venture capital investments that haven't had a profitable year on their books.
It is the fallacy of financial realism. Too many American actually believe money has intrinsic value, rather than just representing a claim on resources and capacity. China can make stuff, and America has piles of digital paper representations of claims that canot be enforced.
Everything is a grift in America!
hot money seek fast profit. VC was the latest game till it crashed last year.
The financial rate of return is far greater than that of physical enterprises, because physical enterprises have to solve problems such as production, export and management, and the cost and operation are huge
@@spicychad55 you're using a product of american venture capitalism right now
Can somebody explain how Chinese companies owning a port in the EU or US could possibly be a threat or the host country not take over their operation and nationalise the ports in case of emergency? If they want to own a port fine, but they can't shut it down or make us refuel their military ships. This seems overly dramatic.
It is just ridiculous.. How can this be a thing of pride?
you're overly naive
Compared to 800 US official military bases around the world, China's response (those ports) is highly insignificant.
As a Myanmar we welcome Chinese ports since US or EU isn't investing in our country. If China wants warships dock there, we fine with that too since US won't invest
@@joemosely9383, Then you tell me how China could possibly make Germany refuel their warships or close down those ports in retaliation?
Most planes in Russia are leased from Western companies, so after the invasion, they just kept them rather than giving them back.
The ports would be no different.
The cries of a declining nation
Alternate title: What should the USA do to protect its hegemony.
China doesn’t have weapon billionaires. It doesn’t engage in businesses of coups, colour revolutions, interventions, or wars. It doesn’t need military bases to do business. Recently China earned status of the happiest country, 91% feeling satisfied and happy, 94% public approval for the government, i.e, very successful democracy. China has built the world’s largest public education, healthcare and social security. It has built new infrastructures, transportation, social and cultural facilities all over with conveniences of digital technologies, i.e high level of human rights. It doesn’t have freedom of shootings, opioids, ganglands, homeless, hunger, lie or being lied upon.
Jealousy leads to war
Solar panel costs are low because of China not USA. CATL worlds largest battery manufacturer. From EV batteries to Grid storage batteries. China sees the future more than the USA.
Those are ports. What is a big deal. Its not military bases like USA. 😂
Many are deep sea ports and can very quickly host large destroyers and subs
@@k.k.c8670 Whats wrong with deep sea port? What makes you think deep sea port must be used for warship and not be used for trade? if i am host country, i prefer a deep sea port which can help bring in large cargo ship or oil tanker for large trade activities and not shallow port for fishing. If those Chinese can handle and manage the port well, i dont see any problem as long as it follows local law and can bring in trade. Only those people who are suspicious of China will think these ports are solely for warship. I guess those USA licker will think 800 military bases around the world is for peace keeping and not for advance US war interest . 🤣
@@entertainmentjoke2871 I think you misread my intention. Nothing wrong for China to turn some of their commercial ports to naval bases if need be and the host countries are agreeable. After all, the US has 800 of them.
US have 800 military bases. That is what is important!
USA is the beacon of freedom, hope and light for the world!
Comes June, the soldiers on them could start to starve if the US doesn't raise the debt ceiling... Yet again.
@@k.k.c8670but unfortunately they will rise debt ceiling anyway .
US, hope of world, where its flag has been at half-mast quater days since 2023 due to gunshot on child.
/s
Yeah right ... USA is the *_fake_* beacon of -serfdom- freedom, -despair- hope and -darkness- light for the world ! The USA invert reality & facts and expect the world to believe them.😂
Only one direction for them - the way of the Roman empire ...
Paranoia over fair competition. The US's militarization would consider toilet paper as a 'National Security' issue since it's used by them and shortages would impede their defence.
China largest importer especially South America and Africa. Building ports and supplying infrastructure help. China very proactive vs reactive with lithium, rare earth metals, nickel, copper, etc. most worlds refining of raw metals completed in China. Amazing from rice paddies to superpower in only 60 years. A force to be reckoned with.
US Logic: I can build military bases, but you can't build ports
Yeah... A thief always believes everybody steals...
😂😂😂😂😂
ok wumao ... you reveal yourself with your projection
We Lie, We Cheat and We Steal.
May I know why that is a concern? Building and operating seems not the same as owning the port? Can they allow military activities without approval, no?
Americans are worried about a Chinese military base in Africa while the Americans have 200+ military bases surrounding China! 🤣
It seems that the message is: for the US politicians to feel safe several neighbours, that are as distant as in Africa, are not allowed to have proper infrastructure vital for their development. If we generalize this idea and allow all countries to be equally entitled to feel safe, then we would go back to become hunters and gatherers.
But even then, there would be an American hunter hiding behind trees, shooting arrows at you.
The U.S. could have been investing in commercial ports and building partnerships instead they chose regime change and endless wars. 🤦🏾♂
Its nice to see a country showing its true colors. Keep it up keep it spiteful.
The greatest threat to the world today is US paranoia
Yeah, the Chinese are not paranoia, racing to build up their military & stealing technology.
China is paranoid of a Democratic Island that wants to be free, independent and recognized by the International Community.
Your spies don't like getting caught do they? How about don't spy and develop your own tech instead. Can't even develop a decent covid vaccine. Pathetic.
They're gonna counter China with gender studies and CRT. Haha
Yeah, China is "winning" by blocking feminism. Way to be on the wrong side of history LOL. Caveman society
I think United States could have easily been the leader in commerce and exert real influence through trade instead of spreading military bases that have little real world value and influence on people’s lives
Arrogance, hubris,war mongering, entitlement etc , I have no sympathy to whatever happens to the US
Knowing history, they would feel more comfortable imposing their will on weak countries, rather than doing that.
The US pressures Equatorial Guinea not to accept the Chinese built port, but is incapable of offering a competing bid for the port. Essentially, they want the country to commit economic suicide for no good reason. Absurd.
This propaganda is pure projection. The US has c. 800 foreign military bases; China has ONE. But in its new cold war, Washington is obsessed with trying to crush Beijing economically, so it cynically portrays its trade relations as "national security threats".
Ironically, the talking head this video interviewed admitted at 1:16 that China's strategic motivations "are fundamentally defensive" -- but then the rest of the video is warmongering propaganda about the Yellow Peril.
China builds ports, US and NATO build military bases.
US has over 800 military based to project force and submitt others by force. Chinese are not the best but they are a thousand times more human the western colonialists.
exactly
it's fine when the US doesn't allow China's investments and cranes. but when it asks other countries not to do so, it is disgraceful. and i think if the US thinks China's crane is threat to national security, just don't use it. buy domestic made crane. these days, american people have seen too much media coverage about this thing. we just don't understand why it is difficult to replace these cranes. the government and media are all talking and zero action.
seems everything is a "threat" these days
Soon they will put Panda on the list too. 😅
USA is NOT concerned about the Chinese NAVY, they are concerned about Developing Nations growing their economies and improving their living standards via economic cooperation with China.
0:09 meanwhile, the United States owns 700 military bases all over the world, including in poor countries where their presence has significantly reduced the long-term political security of the entire region (especially in Africa). So many countries are vulnerable to the US
Why don't the AWSJ make a video and tell us how many military ports the US has around the world. And the numbers of military airports too.
0:08
For the proper context:
95 commercial ports operated by China overseas.
Compared to 300+ US military bases overseas.
WSJ compare with china infrastructure to American military war industrial complex Base 😊😊
China is building ports around the world while the US building military bases around the world
Okay China's building ports not military bases.
investing in port infrastructure overseas vs expending in military bases overseas.....
China builds ports, airports, bridges, hospitals, railroads. The US builds military bases. You chose!
So the US has 700 bases around the world and China 1 and this one should worried us all. Tragic.
That's what it happens when china focus on economy and help 3rd world country and the us only focus on lgbtq stuff
Oh please. Go be a boomer outside of UA-cam. This is what happens when the US doesn’t care about the future
focus on the economy? for 3 years during covid? really? LOL your whackjob leader simply focused on CONTROL per the usual
China is involved in 95 ports worldwide for trade. The U.S. operates 800 plus military bases worldwide producing noting but a big eater of the U.S. tax revenue.
The US focuses on military, China focuses on development. I would tell the US to step aside.
The US: literally tries to encircle China with military bases in Japan SK the Philippines
Also the US: oh no Equatorial Guinea is too close to the US to have a Chinese port of any sort 😂
German government let COSCO Shipping buy the 24.9% stake in Hamburg Tollerort container terminal.
24.9% means china has no voting rights when it comes to that one terminal. So they cannot influence anything happening on it... Btw Hamburg has 42 terminals in total.
whats wrong with buying stake......?
german producers in china invest and have stake / factories in china too
Why does US can’t live in harmonical cooperation with the rest of the world? Why does everything with the US has to be about violent threats? I’m sick of it!
why is it always all about the US? I don't understand.
what kind of risks are we talking about?
the risk of losing its power to control the world and to suck bloods from other countries.
China: 95 commercial ports.
US: 750 military bases.
China is the world's biggest trade partner after all, they need these ports. And if they control these ports, the more they can make efficient and modernize these ports to suit the need and demand of these ports.
USA : do you want a military base?
China : do you want a commercial
Port?
Another one side story. Is Wall Street Journal aware everyone want to vomit on their paper and UA-cam channel
With China doing vastly more trade with many of the countries where it controls ports, reversing China's influence is just a dream.
china has port. US have military base all around the world. why u not talk about that ?
Why don't US just give a better deal then?
US just like war port. Mentality US like war, but power is derived from economic base which US is in decline.
as if these commercial ports in mainland U.S. cannot be easily taken over if a conflict arises
Before China Tianjin port required close to 8 hours to load/unload a container ship.
Currently its only take 45 minutes to complete the tasks with Huawei autonomous systems.
Print another 32 trillion $$$ to buy out all other ports. Problem solved.
I fail to see why ports are something that need to be Countered ?
Dual use as military still requires consent from the host nation.
China building ports across the world....America looking for invisible WMD's across the world 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Having all those ports can all have cost centers under control. Financially it is Mass of money and product under control.
US is totally sick, everything is national security
This is such nonsense! As usual, to understand U.S. posturing, simply "Follow the Money."
The US military is not only large enough to eviscerate China's, it is large enough to take on and defeat the remaining global military balance were they all to unite against the US. As more and more countries catch on to the US MIC's profit-driven intentions (Military-Industrial Complex), the plausibility of a global conflict becomes ever more likely.
exactly
Yes, but a concern is that MCI munitions production stock is low due to the Ukraine, so if a 2nd or 3rd front emerges there may be serious initial problems.
作为中国人，我们非常了解美国中情局的颠覆能力，操纵能力。
会有许多的环保组织抗议，
会有政变或反对派抗议。
----最终把美好的事情都搞砸。
USA: The athlete that trips up the competition when its about to be passed on the 100m sprint competition.
Pathetic.
USA has the Tonya Harding foreign policy 😊
China is done. Look at their disaster domestic situation. Ain't nobody passing anybody.