Looking To The Stars For Answers | Ad Astra Explained | A Video Essay

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лип 2024
  • 🎉🎉 Support Why It’s Great for exclusive access to original music and new Patron-Only Podcast! 🎉🎉 ▶️ / whyitsgreat
    Welcome to Why It's Great! Where you'll find Positive Pop Culture Analysis. Ad Astra is one of my favorite films of 2019. This video essay dives into why, analyzing the major themes, use of focus, color, and symbols to craft a breathtaking internal odyssey. Staring Oscar Winner Brad Pitt.
    LISTEN TO OUR PODCAST, THE PROFESSIONAL APPRECIATORS:
    SPOTIFY:open.spotify.com/show/5qUmnw1...
    APPLE:podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    📬💌 Join our mailing list: bit.ly/whygreatemail
    _____________________
    🎵MUSIC🎵
    Dan Drake: "To The Top" Original Composition
    Dan Drake: "In The Groove" Original Composition
    Dan Drake: "Plant In Pavement" Original Composition
    Dan Drake: "Shimmer" Original Composition
    Dan Drake: "Free Your Mind" Original Composition
    Dan Drake: "To The Stars" Original Composition
    Dan Drake: "Consolation" Original Composition
    Dan Drake: "Missing You" Original Composition
    10 seconds of Foo Fighters: 'Learn To Fly"
    Become a patron to download and license these tracks.
    ▶️ / whyitsgreat
    --------Cameras and Gear Used To Shoot This Video ------
    1. Canon 7D - amzn.to/2jRn5ZS
    2. Neewer Ring Light - amzn.to/2lNgiB0
    3. Neewer Ring Light Stand - amzn.to/2lNgqAu
    4. Microphone - MXL 990: amzn.to/2USZbKs
    5. Audio Interface - Focusrite Scarlett 2i4: amzn.to/2U36Mcc
    6. Audio recorded with Ableton Live: amzn.to/2UN0ZVk
    _____________________
    📱Connect with us on Social Media 🔽
    📸 / whyitsgreat1
    📘 / whyitsgreat1
    🐦 / dandrake333
    🖥 DanDrake333.com/
    _____________________
    PATRONS
    - Steven Webster
    - Jacob Trexler
    - Pat Werths
    - Jacob Wieneman
    - Aaron Hanson
    - Chris Link
    - Chris Nelson
    - George Levin
    - Kent Sanders
    DISCLAIMER: This video and description contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission.
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 221

  • @secretworldcomics
    @secretworldcomics 4 роки тому +169

    Love your analysis. Can't believe this one wasn't more praised by audiences. One of the most underrated films of the last decade.

    • @lightandfire24
      @lightandfire24 4 роки тому +3

      Thanks so much! And I totally agree.

    • @Cologram
      @Cologram 4 роки тому +2

      I only saw one trailer for it and I’m glad my friend and I are both into space because we saw this immediately when it came out. I loved it! 8.5/10

    • @promethean2904
      @promethean2904 4 роки тому +5

      For what? For being dumb? :)
      Even my roommate knows looking for intelligent life around Neptune is probably the stupidest idea...

    • @sodarkherhair78
      @sodarkherhair78 3 роки тому +1

      I appreciate your view but apparently there is also a scientific take on this, check out "Science vs Cinema Ad Astra".

    • @EJD339
      @EJD339 3 роки тому +1

      @@sodarkherhair78 I loved it. I wasn’t really looking to fact check this movie. 9/10 I don’t give a crap about that stuff. I just like the way the movie made me feel. Definitely not for everyone though. I can barely recommend this to any of my friends.

  • @jordynhenthorn7157
    @jordynhenthorn7157 2 роки тому +28

    This movie is so amazing. It was so much deeper than it looked on the surface and had a much deeper, philosophical meaning. This movie deserved so much more praise.

  • @joaquinwaters1810
    @joaquinwaters1810 11 місяців тому +11

    James Gray, the director, said that one of his primary inspirations was the idea of telling the Odyssey from the point of view of Telemachus (the son of Odysseus who goes searching for his father). And in the Odyssey, who is the god keeping Odysseus from coming home? Poseidon...aka Neptune.

  • @GoTeam383
    @GoTeam383 3 роки тому +44

    I knew this was my favorite sci-fi movie in decades before seeing this video, but it's good to know not everyone hated it.

  • @michaeljohnson1761
    @michaeljohnson1761 3 роки тому +30

    "A man that has to leave earth in order to find his place in it." I've long said that I left the church not to leave God, but to find my place inside of God.
    Your video is an Amazing insight into the film. You opened up so much more texture and more dimensions for me. This film is quickly moving it's way to my very small circle of Absolute Favorite Films. Thank you.

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  3 роки тому +2

      Thank you so much! Leaving something to find it. It’s powerful and so so true.

  • @ayindeabiola509
    @ayindeabiola509 4 роки тому +58

    Why this was great. It deserves way more views.

  • @dannyboyemt
    @dannyboyemt 4 роки тому +26

    You guys actually made me tear up in this analysis. Beautifully done.

  • @cynicalburns584
    @cynicalburns584 3 роки тому +4

    Just found this..wow! Why hasn't this hit a million views yet?!

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  3 роки тому

      Thank you! We’ll get there. I appreciate you.

  • @thepeeps8248
    @thepeeps8248 2 роки тому +6

    Interpreted everything I couldn't entirely explain in words. Fine analysis of a very
    deep film.

  • @Cologram
    @Cologram 4 роки тому +48

    Incredible analysis, Dan! You made me appreciate this film much more than I already did and just made a great video in general.

  • @JohnDoe-vr9bj
    @JohnDoe-vr9bj Рік тому +2

    Just found this channel looking for a review on Ad Astra, having just finished it. After watching just this one video, I must say, this channel is such a breath of fresh air on UA-cam, particularly among the film review wheelhouse. It seems most UA-camrs take the easy route to both film criticism and gaining a following, that being taking a cynical approach and pointing out everything and anything negative about a piece of work. Extra UA-cam algorithm points for appealing to anti-woke audiences and shoehorning politics into their 'reviews', especially when a film is largely a-political, or at least not particularly divisive, until 'reviewed' a typical UA-cam dullard.
    Anyone can point out flaws and be a cynic. It becomes very easy to do as one ages. The body suffers more pain, as does the mind, plus we generally develop a stronger sense of 'seen it all before' mentality, and find ourselves jaded and feeling as though the best days are behind us. Therefore, feeling unimpressed by anything, and not even disappointed, as our expectations are set so low in general. Perhaps I'm only describing my personal experience, and none of the above is generalisable. However, I don't think so, as the majority of full time UA-cam film reviewers seems to be catered towards this type of demographic. Or maybe, they are creating such a demographic. I won't bother naming any of these 'reviewers', as there are too many, I don't deliberately watch them, I don't want them to gain more views or have the algorithm sense from my comment that I want them suggested to me, and I think we can all think of more examples of what I'm talking about than we would like.
    It actually takes effort to love something and and appreciate all the reasons that make you feel that way. Well, at least in my experience as I've aged enough to start to feel physically and mentally over the hill, yet am so far from the apex that I can't see the top of it, nor do I know what is there or why I'm even trying to get there. All I know is that it's getting harder to climb each day, and I'll never see the top in my life, no matter how hard I try to do so.
    Anyway, I'm starting to drag the comment section down with the sort of negative attitude that initially stated that I resent. It's almost inescapable. Especially on UA-cam movie reviews. Hence why those reviewers get rewarded with vies and likes etc. for putting in very little effort, compared to channels such as this, that help jaded people such as myself, or those that aren't well versed in the language of cinema, again, such as myself, to put in a little work to overcome these barriers to enjoying the art of film, and ultimately, the struggles of life.
    Great video, and channel. Thanks for putting in the effort to explain what you found great about this really good film. I look forward to seeing more of your reviews and film related content in the future.

  • @wesselwijtvliet418
    @wesselwijtvliet418 6 місяців тому

    This is actually a very good review of the movie. The authors managed to break down the entire movie in deceptively simple terms. That’s so much more difficult than doing so in pedantic ones. Kudos. I am watching this channel more often.

  • @macsen2290
    @macsen2290 2 роки тому +2

    im studying media studies for A level atm, love the vid

  • @wannabehendrix
    @wannabehendrix 3 роки тому +4

    One thing that can be asked. Are we as humans, meant to be away from earth? The moment he finds out how and why his father killed the crew is horrifying!

  • @Elayzee
    @Elayzee 4 місяці тому

    I’m just thankful for a big budget space movie that stands firm on the idea that we ARE alone in the universe. And that it’s NOT something to fear or be depressed about.

  • @shrutikumarrr
    @shrutikumarrr 3 роки тому +9

    Best analysis I’ve found on the internet. Your content is so awesome

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  3 роки тому +1

      Wow! Thank you for such high praise. I appreciate it, truly.

  • @Day5Aquatics
    @Day5Aquatics 4 роки тому +15

    Ad Astra was really good, maybe not great. I think the biggest detriment to the movie was the trailers and advertising. It set up the viewer for something entirely different than what the movie actually was. It was basically Apocalypse Now in space. It's impossible not to make that comparison. Just like Apocalypse Now you are set up in the beginning thinking the movie was about the mission, but in turn it becomes about the man and his personal journey while on the mission. Good movie. A little slow but not necessarily in a bad way.

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks for sharing your perspective. I get what you're saying. Marketing has often messed up my expectations for films and I hate it. That's why I mostly avoid trailers at this point.

    • @dkazmer2
      @dkazmer2 4 роки тому +1

      Marketing has absolutely nothing to do with how great a film is or isn't.

    • @ripmurdock6975
      @ripmurdock6975 4 роки тому +2

      @@dkazmer2 It doesn't and it shouldn't, but in this case I think it has affected the broader perception of the film. Instead of being a thought of as highly-regarded, thought-provoking sci fi film by a smaller group of cinema fans, it's thought of a slightly meh, "boring" sci film that didn't deliver to a broader more mainstream audience. I'm in the former camp, the marketing played a part in forming the latter group imo.

    • @elevenseven-yq4vu
      @elevenseven-yq4vu 9 місяців тому

      I feel like Ad Astra uses the Apocalypse Now plot and the 2001: A Space Odyssey aesthetic to tell a story that is most closest to The Tree of Life.
      On another note, Apocalypse Now might be a bit removed from the actual influence to Ad Astra, the novel that Apocalypse Now is based on: Heart of Darkness. Instead of the Vietnam war setting, it takes place in 19th century colonial times - and that colonial aspect, the spread of exploitation, commodification, outposts from and for a capitalistic empire at the center reaching out to new worlds, is what also makes Ad Astra's world a good backdrop for characters who try to escape problems close to them by reaching for something bigger - but just take these problems with them and make them bigger in turn.

  • @zzyzzy5466
    @zzyzzy5466 4 роки тому +3

    moving internal odessy..... good description

  • @LuisGonzalez-xs1tt
    @LuisGonzalez-xs1tt 2 роки тому +2

    Beautiful. Thanks for this. I knew I loved the movie but I did not understood exactly why. Now, I know why. Thanks again

  • @mdwesquire
    @mdwesquire Рік тому +1

    I just discovered this channel with this video. You’ve earned another subscriber.

  • @musangema3046
    @musangema3046 2 роки тому +4

    Well done gentlemen, and thank you.

  • @mastaaceexclusive
    @mastaaceexclusive Рік тому +1

    Really like how clear and concise the meat of this video is. And the specific moments

  • @PYTwwe
    @PYTwwe 4 роки тому +23

    Wow. This is an impressive review!!! So many details I missed.

  • @AL-SH
    @AL-SH 3 роки тому +3

    This was truly beautiful and deeply touching. I subbed. Thank you

  • @Girthon1
    @Girthon1 4 роки тому +3

    A wonderful wonderful video.
    Thank you.

  • @lexio9913
    @lexio9913 Рік тому +1

    Love this analysis, very informative over things I didn’t catch when I watch the film.

  • @johnedward8352
    @johnedward8352 4 роки тому +1

    Just watched Ad Astra and your vid came up..well done, this is awesome. Subscribed!

  • @obsidian00
    @obsidian00 4 роки тому +3

    Fantastic essay...Fantastic movie.

  • @snaphaan5049
    @snaphaan5049 4 роки тому +11

    Fantastic Analysis!! Loved it!
    Although I do have a slightly different interpretation of the end. I'll make a quick comparison to interstellar to try and make it clearer...
    Interstellar was at times pretty spectacular. But it was a jab at people who believe in a higher power. Right in the beginning it takes a jab at the biblical reference of Eden: We are not caretakers (like Adam in the garden) but pioneers (Nimrod the hunter - builder of cities and carver of his own destiny). That pioneering spirit is kind of what drives cooper into actually becoming a "god" or supernatural being himself (in a sci-fi kinda way) - the poltergeist thing. It's deep, but for me, for all the wrong reasons - and I like the movie because of that. It helped me figure out my place in the world. I don't want to be cooper or be part of that world view.
    Ad Astra helped me in another way. It kind of helped me get back to living now. Like the biblical reference of not worrying about tomorrow but living for the day. The people you love and the things I can value today. My personal search for meaning has had a bitter and almost nihilistic end because I can find no meaning in the world. Everything I did, all the good and bad in my life has no meaning because death is waiting. I have reached as far as I can in my abilities for answers and it has left me desolate and alone. I've suffered depression because of that for years. Ad astra in a weird sci-fi can make you wonder if you didn't miss something. It's like those people in the parable of Matthew that after dedicating their lives to the bettering of their fellow man was told in the end by God "'Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me." Forgiveness isn't just something you receive - but something you are supposed to give as well.
    It didn't seem like a jab at a higher power nor some preachy finger pointing. But one thing I admired about Roy was he had a purpose and he went with it. But he was no savior, no hero in the normal sense of the word. He was a man who went to ends of the world and came back defeated but with new purpose. Classic. And I don't care what people say - I love moon pirates.

    • @lightandfire24
      @lightandfire24 4 роки тому +3

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts. And yes, Moon Pirates rule!

    •  4 роки тому +1

      Loved to read it

  • @evanpcgamer
    @evanpcgamer 4 роки тому +4

    Great video!

  • @blahanger4304
    @blahanger4304 3 роки тому +3

    Awesome analysis, awesome movie, subbed :)

  • @jeffsmith3925
    @jeffsmith3925 2 роки тому +3

    The bright “speck of light” Roy sees toward the end is the Sun not Earth. The Sun looks like a bright star from that distance. I’m not even sure Earth would be visible to the naked eye from that far.

  • @elevenseven-yq4vu
    @elevenseven-yq4vu 9 місяців тому

    Great analysis and interpretation!

  •  4 роки тому +3

    Good work!

  • @chickennugget6985
    @chickennugget6985 3 роки тому +2

    Loved the review.... subscribing 👍

  • @EvanEvansE3
    @EvanEvansE3 2 роки тому

    You have to let go of the pursuit and embrace the gifts of life around you. Live. Love. Die.
    Don't take for granted everything you have. There is nothing better.
    Mankind's constant pursuit for something greater ultimately leads one to miss out on life and living. To breath. To enjoy. To love. To create. These are the gifts of life we have in abundance on this planet and this planet like no other.

  • @ntl2313
    @ntl2313 4 роки тому +2

    What a video! Idk how you don't have more subs

  • @damdaley8092
    @damdaley8092 4 роки тому +2

    Amazing video

  • @harryhipperson1280
    @harryhipperson1280 2 роки тому +2

    Great video. The tiny spec of light isn’t Earth though it’s the sun

  • @jonathanraecrisanto5912
    @jonathanraecrisanto5912 3 роки тому +1

    WHY IS THIS VIDEO ONLY HAVE 8K VIEWS???!!!

  • @jeff1176
    @jeff1176 2 роки тому +3

    This is how you explain a movie. Top notch guys. Absolutely well done. The movie was well done as well I thought. Bravo all around.

  • @jennisjohnvarghese1670
    @jennisjohnvarghese1670 3 роки тому

    This is absolutely beautiful

  • @PeterKudelin
    @PeterKudelin 4 роки тому +8

    this is REALLY good! I'm a film student, and I missed a lot of these (esp. color)

  • @yokumato
    @yokumato 3 роки тому +1

    Great movie, thanks for the analysis, I think is spot on. I could notice how there like 2 scenes where prayer is present and thought why such rational and focused people would need to pray at all. Also the father mentions God several times, talking about his presence, mission, etc.
    The nods to 2001 are present here and there, overall I think is a great movie but certainly not for people that are expecting action and explosions.
    The scene with monkeys was shocking!

  • @nimrodgrrrl
    @nimrodgrrrl 4 роки тому +10

    Wow! Why isn’t this channel getting more views and subs? Awesome analysis!

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  4 роки тому +2

      Thank you! That means a lot.

  • @JohnLee-ss7mv
    @JohnLee-ss7mv 3 роки тому

    Please keep up the great work and growth. The viewership will explode soon 👍🏻

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  3 роки тому

      Thank you! That’s the plan.🤞🏻

  • @WayneMemphisMojo
    @WayneMemphisMojo 4 роки тому +2

    Excellent analysis ... now subscribed

  • @ajcsojourner1234
    @ajcsojourner1234 3 роки тому +1

    good video!

  • @BrakeTradition
    @BrakeTradition 3 роки тому +2

    Haven’t seen this movie yet, and I think y’all have done a beautiful analysis of it without spoiling it for me

  • @frankvee
    @frankvee Рік тому +1

    This is a phenomenal film. I have to admit, I didn't like it much after first viewing. I think expectations and marketing got the best of me, and I was expecting something different than what was delivered. But after some time I watched it again, knowing it wasn't an action film as it was marketed, and my opinion of Ad Astra made a 180 degree turn.

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  Рік тому +2

      So many of my favorite films were a tad underwhelming when I first watched them. But they stayed in my brain, and their value emerged from dialoging with the cinematic language and themes in my head. Letting a film sit with you is essential IMO

  • @ColeMayes
    @ColeMayes 4 роки тому +4

    Thank you two for giving us this video. You showed beautifully exactly what is so important, not only about this movie, but what the human race can do to save all life on our only known home.

  • @heidimoon8114
    @heidimoon8114 4 роки тому +9

    This was one of the most entertaining and complete film analysis videos I've ever watched. Urinalysis was even better than a great movie that is Ad Astra. Thank you for a great video I'll be sharing it you deserve way more views!

    • @MsSwitchblade13
      @MsSwitchblade13 3 роки тому

      "Urinalysis" sorry i know it's a typo but it made me 🤭 giggle

    • @JohnDoe-vr9bj
      @JohnDoe-vr9bj Рік тому

      lol, I I keep failing my urinalysis test. I don't think I'll ever graduate from that class.

  • @krissifadwa
    @krissifadwa 2 роки тому +1

    Ad Astra and 2049 Blade Runner ✨

  • @corneliaxx
    @corneliaxx 2 роки тому +1

    this video is a masterpiece

  • @Jasamkarla
    @Jasamkarla 2 роки тому +1

    Bravoooo so profound

  • @Octansishere
    @Octansishere 2 місяці тому

    damn, just realised you also did the focus blur thing at the start and the end of the video just like in ad astra

  • @rahilameer1094
    @rahilameer1094 3 роки тому +2

    Best review

  • @viswanthgudiwada3591
    @viswanthgudiwada3591 4 роки тому +1

    NICE MANN..

  • @scottryder6437
    @scottryder6437 3 роки тому +2

    Theory: What if we, humanity, are actually the first intelligent species in the universe? That in millions or billions of years we are the ones reaching out to future intelligent species? We would be like the mysterious higher beings in 2001 Space Odyssey and Contact.

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  3 роки тому +2

      I’ve had this thought before. Love it.

    • @imconsequetau5275
      @imconsequetau5275 2 роки тому +1

      It is conceivable that we are the first in this Galaxy. Impossible that we are the first in this Universe. Just using the Hubble telescope we know there hundreds of billions of visible nearby galaxies, and we haven't even looked further away through the James Webb telescope.

  • @kouzelna3295
    @kouzelna3295 3 роки тому +3

    Absolutely awesome review. Thank you for helping me to more greatly appreciate such a wonderful and touching movie.

  • @mr-nobody-kun
    @mr-nobody-kun 3 роки тому +1

    F
    Man I loved the 1st 1min 😅
    This explanation is all I need 🖤

  • @siyabongakunene5052
    @siyabongakunene5052 3 роки тому +2

    Damn, this analysis is deeply profound and gave me a meaningful insight not only into the movie but my life as well.

  • @loominka7194
    @loominka7194 3 роки тому +3

    you guys deserve more views. i'm inspired by this analysis and want to make one movie explanation channel like this too

  • @damienconlisk8725
    @damienconlisk8725 2 роки тому +2

    This was better than the film which no matter which way you spin it,,, it was some piece of crap,,, but I enjoyed the end cause it was the end,,,, o and thank goodness for the fast forward button

  • @jalaldalloul8172
    @jalaldalloul8172 3 роки тому

    Excellent video! Would you guys consider doing a video (or ten) about The Expanse? Possibly one of the best sci-fi properties on TV right now

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  3 роки тому +1

      I haven't seen it. I'll have to give it a shot. It's based on a book series right?

    • @jalaldalloul8172
      @jalaldalloul8172 3 роки тому +1

      @@WhyItsGreat It is! By James S.A. Corey, pen name for Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck. The show is on Amazon Prime Video.
      Thanks for responding! Love your channel to death

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  3 роки тому +1

      Awesome. Would you recommend starting with the books or just diving into the show?
      And thank you for saying that. It means a lot to me.

    • @jalaldalloul8172
      @jalaldalloul8172 3 роки тому +1

      @@WhyItsGreat I would say that both properties are excellent and it really just depends on how you would want to experience the story first. There are 8 books out with the 9th and last book due later this year, and the show is currently adaptating book 5. The books are a good deal ahead of the show and will end before the next season premieres (presumably Dec 2021 or early 2022).
      I personally started with the show and found myself still capable of adoring the first few books despite knowing what would happen. The overall narrative thread is identical between the two, but given the change in medium the show tells that story in a fairly different way such that both will remain fresh in my experience.

  • @mirandanix7684
    @mirandanix7684 3 роки тому

    This story needs more than one viewing..sobriety requires introversion perspective.as self worth..reconfirmed to even one person..as still valued more than time or distance.seperations.

  • @davor432
    @davor432 Рік тому +1

    beautiful

  • @EJD339
    @EJD339 3 роки тому +1

    I think the score is what just had me sucked in the whole movie. I just felt a connection to this movie for whatever reason and I’m thankful for that. One of my favorite sci-fi movies of the last 5 years but definitely not for everyone.

  • @Crossodian
    @Crossodian Рік тому +1

    My favorite film of all time.

    • @elevenseven-yq4vu
      @elevenseven-yq4vu 9 місяців тому

      Can you recommend others like it?
      I can think of The Tree of Life, which is not sci-fi at all and has other cinematic techniques, but its theme is similar and it also uses memories and thoughts delivered by an off-screen voice.

    • @Crossodian
      @Crossodian 9 місяців тому +1

      @@elevenseven-yq4vu Blade runner 2049 and the First Man. I love the first man with Ryan Gosling. The story is very similar to Ad astra, lonely man trying to find purpose in his life after his daughter died. It's also in space, it's about Armstrong the man who landed on the moon. It has beautiful cinematography and actors. THE FIRST MAN

    • @Crossodian
      @Crossodian 9 місяців тому +1

      @@elevenseven-yq4vu I would also recommend “ the assassination of Jesse james”, it's played by Brad Pitt. It's almost similar to Ad astra because Jesse is a broken man who is ashamed of himself. The difference is he a bad man who has done awful things .

    • @elevenseven-yq4vu
      @elevenseven-yq4vu 9 місяців тому

      @@Crossodian Thanks! Will check out trailer and a couple reviews of The First Man. 💙
      (Blade Runner 2049 I do like.)

    • @Crossodian
      @Crossodian 9 місяців тому

      @@elevenseven-yq4vu I would also recommend “From Hell” great film. It's about a broken man finding Jack the Reaper. Also Constantine is good. Hope you enjoy the films.

  • @mandariv
    @mandariv 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent writing guys! Great editing too. Be very much interested in hearing your opinions on The house that Jack built, from Lars von Trier. Simultaneously beautiful and repellent.

    • @lightandfire24
      @lightandfire24 3 роки тому +1

      Haven't seen it yet! Looking forward to checking it out

  • @HILAL19564
    @HILAL19564 Рік тому +1

    This scifi is definite underrated and beautifully made, acted etc.. Only thing I don't get is how in God's name Pitt's father created power surges that could endanger earth all the way from neptune with his ship..can you answer that cause that's the only thing I didn't understand and seemed very far fetched.. Rest this movie is great. The voyage of Pitt going through all these dangers to get to neptune is thrilling and the way its made is jaw dropping. Plus Pitt played this role perfectly. Underrated but still these surges were a bit unrealistic or I didn't get it entirely

    • @elevenseven-yq4vu
      @elevenseven-yq4vu 9 місяців тому

      I guess these power waves are mostly there for symbolism.
      He is the center of his son's journey. And his emotional coldness turned his son to emotional coldness.
      It's like the image of ripples on water caused by a stone dropped into it:
      They hit the shore with delay.
      It took the son time to become like his father, time that the father spend away from him.
      The emotional shockwaves hit the son later, much like the power surges hit Earth much later than the father left.
      And even away from earth, the father was still the son's emotional center. He could suppress this conscious thought on earth, but his father was still his emotional center and thus kept other people (such as his wive) out of the son's focus.
      If you take types like the father (hyperfocussed and emotionally cold explorers) as a stand-in for humanity's attitude towards the world at large, the metaphor reads:
      Humans can travel to the edge of the universe as hard as they try to save Earth's problems; but they will take the center of their problems with them; and with an attitude like this, which is a problem in itself, the ripples/repercussions of their attitudes toward the world will travel all the way back to Earth and can harm it like tidal waves.
      It's a cautionary tale:
      The solution to humanity's problems is at the heart of humanity, not somewhere outside of itself.

  • @bobo2422
    @bobo2422 3 роки тому

    Can you explain abyssosque?

  • @onlockmobileskateshop113
    @onlockmobileskateshop113 3 роки тому

    Ive watched it 3 times now and still don't understand the story. Help

  • @Brandon-yg7mw
    @Brandon-yg7mw 3 роки тому +1

    Freakin loved this movie

  • @spacewitchvulcan
    @spacewitchvulcan 2 роки тому

    I see they finally made "The Alchemist"

  • @RumbleFish69
    @RumbleFish69 4 роки тому +1

    Maybe I need to see this film again. I didn't think it was bad, but I didn't think it was particularly good either. I felt this film built up to a payoff that just never really pays off. I am in favor of conveying a powerful message at the end of a film, as this film did, but only if that message is as cinematically powerful as a twist or shocking revelation. I just don't believe that was the case in this film. But, like I said, maybe I need to go back and watch it again. This was a pretty good review of this film and it has definitely made me want to give this film a second look.

    • @lightandfire24
      @lightandfire24 4 роки тому +4

      Thanks for the kind words about our video! Films hit everyone in different ways. The themes resonated with me on a personal level, but totally understand how this film could leave someone wanting more.

    • @RumbleFish69
      @RumbleFish69 4 роки тому +2

      @@lightandfire24 It's ironic that I see a response from you today when I just revisited this film last night! I can tell you that my takeaway this time out was far different than my first viewing of this film. I had a greater appreciation for this film and absorbed things much differently this time around. I can also say that watching your review helped me to better navigate the things that I missed the first time I watched this film. Mostly, I think that the first time I saw this film I went in expecting things that film never intended delivering, which is ok as long as I know what I am getting into. I believe this film was marketed in a way that was not beneficial to the filmmaker or audience. The audience is put on a path that never materializes, which only serves to disappoint. I believe that most people went into this film thinking that it would be pure Sci-fi thriller on the same level as "Aliens". So, when we don't get that, it leaves the viewers with such a tremendous sense of disappointment, that you're not even thinking about whether what you just saw was good or not. I also have a greater appreciation for the end of the film this time around. The ending has far greater significance and there is a certain, calming satisfaction in knowing that we are alone. Thanks again for your review....I don't think I would have given this film a second look had you not reviewed it. I already gave you a thumbs up, but after this pay-off, it's worth a sub! 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽

    • @lightandfire24
      @lightandfire24 4 роки тому +2

      I'm glad our video helped! Rewatches our an essential for me. It's hard to really know how you feel after one watch. And the confusing marketing is a big reason why we decided to make this analysis.
      Thanks again for engaging with our video!

    • @RumbleFish69
      @RumbleFish69 4 роки тому +2

      @@lightandfire24 Thanks again, my friend!!

    • @dkazmer2
      @dkazmer2 4 роки тому +1

      You've been conditioned to expect sensationalism. Let that go.

  • @elithegreat6463
    @elithegreat6463 4 роки тому +2

    Yeah, but who were the Moon Pirates ???,, WTF was that all about, and how fast were the ships in this movie ??, A Trip back and for to Neptune is no walk to the park ??

  • @gothxm
    @gothxm Рік тому

    Parphrased :
    It's Apocalypse Now in Space lol
    -Tarantino

    • @viarnay
      @viarnay Рік тому

      wrong, it is In the heart of the darkness instead :- 1

  • @RoadWarrior-lo9vt
    @RoadWarrior-lo9vt 2 роки тому

    I've watched many film breakdown UA-cam channels in the last few years. I must say, your's are without a doubt the most enjoyable to watch. Myself, being a person who truly appreciates the underlying message or messages in a film. I appreciate your obvious passion for the entire film process and it's deeper meanings. If that makes sense. I'm having alittle trouble getting my thoughts out today.
    ✌🥴
    P.s. Is it just me?.. I get a Stanley Kubrick vibe from this film.

  • @errollaaron8732
    @errollaaron8732 4 роки тому +6

    Liked the movie but not sure how the father came to the conclusion there is no life in the universe. He only traveled to the planet Neptune how can he conclude such a terrible analysis?

    • @dkazmer2
      @dkazmer2 4 роки тому +3

      And how did _you_ conclude that? Cliff was simply disappointed in that he failed in his mission to find ETL. That's it.

    • @CrisisHipHop
      @CrisisHipHop 3 роки тому +1

      They explained in the movie, they travel to Neptune to escape the effects of the sun's electromagnetic interference, now that they aren't inhibited by that, using the instruments in the lima project they can observe far off planets and galaxies in a way they couldn't before. They in a sense could see the "knowable" universe from that "vantage point" at Neptune and in each planet the team discovered no life anywhere they pointed their instruments, so much so they wanted to go back seeing that the whole search was fruitless, which then prompted them to want to go home which then prompted the mutiny and war between the captain and crew.

    • @errollaaron8732
      @errollaaron8732 3 роки тому

      @@CrisisHipHop But, even then their observation would be from their point of observation which would be essentially as if you're dropping a drop into an ocean. Even with their instruments to detect life on other planets his conclusion was incorrect.

    • @imconsequetau5275
      @imconsequetau5275 2 роки тому +1

      @@errollaaron8732
      Right. It is like searching for "life" by dipping a cup in an alien ocean, and then giving up.

    • @elevenseven-yq4vu
      @elevenseven-yq4vu 9 місяців тому

      ​@@CrisisHipHopSo this means that Cliff was like Captain Ahab in Moby Dick: Refusing to give up the whale hunt at the expense of the entire crew and ship.

  • @TonyJames.
    @TonyJames. 4 роки тому +1

    is an awsome movie

  • @darthkek1953
    @darthkek1953 Рік тому

    It's great because it's Pinocchio in Space.

  • @bjrnhagen4484
    @bjrnhagen4484 3 роки тому +1

    Nice breakdown. However, I did not like this movie - a supposedly slow movie that felt rushed. No tension, no buildups, I couldn't care less about the protagonist. When he reaches Neptune, I felt no journey, no deep space, and when he effortlessly finds his father, there's no tension between them - then he goes home. The end.

  • @leesydneyharry7958
    @leesydneyharry7958 Рік тому

    I’m glad I chose your review all the other reviews are seemingly disappointing. Anyhow you know how it’s said movies steal from other movies, well here you are a little Mad Max during the Moon mobile “Hear we go again” and a “Old country for old men” as Tommy Lee Jones looking for god out in space.😉 I’ll stop here. Great review for a great movie in my opinion.

  • @dcw0110us
    @dcw0110us 3 роки тому

    You can run but you can’t hide

  • @josemaldonarico
    @josemaldonarico 2 роки тому

    Saturn devouring his sons

  • @adamkallin5160
    @adamkallin5160 3 роки тому +1

    I like the idea of the flares being suppressed emotions that will fuck everything up unless you deal with them. Though, it didn't quite come through in the movie as Roy's sole focus was on his father and mission rather than something he tried to suppress. Interesting about the focus and color though I don't think those aspects really registered with me even subconsciously.
    Tommy Lee Jones gave a short but fantastic performance. I do think some scenes could have been trimmed to give the movie a better pacing.

  • @jonathanraecrisanto5912
    @jonathanraecrisanto5912 3 роки тому

    9:40 I think that's the sun

  • @clutch2827
    @clutch2827 3 роки тому

    Some of the science took me right out of the movie.

  • @mirandanix7684
    @mirandanix7684 3 роки тому

    A fool is still a fool for leaving in the first place..let's play..love.

  • @gibbsm
    @gibbsm 3 роки тому

    I bugs me that Roy doesn't have his astronaut wings on his dress uniform, but does on his utility uniform.

  • @greglott4977
    @greglott4977 3 роки тому

    It’s unfortunate that Ad Astra only works as a metaphor. It’s SO close to being a great, science accurate movie. Scenes in the vacuum are silent, which is great since sound cannot travel without medium. When Pitt returns, he can barely stand, which is accurate. His muscles wouldve atrophied due to months in zero G. But then, at the very center of everything is the stupid Surge plot. Apparently, Dad is in space sending Surges that has disastrous impact on Earth... some 3 billion miles away. For that kind of energy to impact earth, it would’ve basically created a black hole at Neptune. If the energy at origin is H, the energy expressed at Earth would be H/4*Pi*R*R where R is 3 billion miles. It’s just SO lazy! They could’ve conjured any number of realistic reasons for Pitt to travel to find his father on Neptune, but they chose this one. I think the movie is ok, but it fails as Sci-Fi.

    • @greglott4977
      @greglott4977 3 роки тому +1

      I just remembered two other things that REALLY bothered me.
      1. Dad is searching for ET from Neptune. Why? We’re talking about planets 100’s of light years away, Neptune doesn’t really give you a greater view point than say, the moon.
      2. Pitt had to go to Mars to send a laser email to Dad. Why? Lasers work from the moon too. Btw, sometimes the Earth is closer to Neptune than Mars is. Maybe Earth and Neptune are ‘East’ of the sun and Mars is on the other side of the sun. Earth would be closer. Regardless, laser communication could work just as well from here as they would from Mars. No need to make that crazy ass trip just to send an email.

  • @mirandanix7684
    @mirandanix7684 3 роки тому

    Happiness is..convoluted at times..spirals of emotions..is a snail...starfish.as too much time on my hands..song.

    • @mirandanix7684
      @mirandanix7684 3 роки тому

      Skipping over the ocean like a song......who is the singer?..

    • @mirandanix7684
      @mirandanix7684 3 роки тому

      Ps..a canvas of grey..is ..exploring the unknowns...you let go..YOU Let Go! As your final choice..words disguise emotions more often than reveal the truths...conclusion..

  • @mirandanix7684
    @mirandanix7684 3 роки тому

    Brad Pitt is more science educated than he ever let's on..cute as hell is outstanding..inner self values as self determined is always more to be learned. C owboy.....kisses.

  • @niluferplum
    @niluferplum 3 роки тому +1

    Your analysis is really well put together, and you highlighted some interesting elements. I have to say though, I enjoyed your video more than the film. Whilst a lot of thought and care seems to have gone into Ad Astra, I found the result unengaging. Concept alone (even a good one) is no substitute for great storytelling.

  • @logannathan1650
    @logannathan1650 3 роки тому

    What is ad asta trying to tell us
    AD: with amazon you don't need...

  • @Luisfaya86
    @Luisfaya86 Рік тому

    I fell asleep with the movie and also with your review

    • @WhyItsGreat
      @WhyItsGreat  Рік тому +1

      Hope you got some good rest 👍👍

  • @Statuskuo75
    @Statuskuo75 3 роки тому

    Cinema

  • @viarnay
    @viarnay Рік тому

    Your review should be included on every Ad-Astra blue-ray but, Where is the spoiler alert warning for God's sake?

  • @Nexus2Eden
    @Nexus2Eden Рік тому

    GATTACA, Ad Astra,…