The Facebook Marketplace Merlin Engine. Ep2. Building Up The Crank Assembly...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2024
  • In this second instalment I assemble the crankshaft and connecting rods for this Rolls-Royce Merlin XX, built at Glasgow in 1942 and once fitted to a Handley Page Halifax heavy bomber which crashed in Germany.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 58

  • @andrewwmacfadyen6958
    @andrewwmacfadyen6958 10 місяців тому +9

    My aunt did quality control checks on Merlin engine crank shafts more than possible she checked that one.

  • @sdkfz250b
    @sdkfz250b 10 місяців тому +6

    As someone who currently works for RR at Derby building modern Civil Jet engines (Trent 1000 & XWB) these videos are fascinating to watch....love a Merlin ❤

  • @pacmans-world
    @pacmans-world 9 місяців тому +3

    I find these videos very informative. There’s not a huge amount of information on the Merlin across UA-cam so it’s nice to watch your videos.

  • @david929190
    @david929190 10 місяців тому +1

    I'd paused the last video to examine the beautiful crank and rods. How the fork roads were made is stunning.

    • @judithwedge133
      @judithwedge133 9 місяців тому

      Yes ! On my tablet you can also zoom in for even more detail.

  • @TimS366
    @TimS366 10 місяців тому +5

    Lovely to see this stage by stage, thank you Peter!

  • @andyglewv8
    @andyglewv8 10 місяців тому +6

    Enjoying this stage by stage build up. Looking forward to the next episode

  • @jimfuller5309
    @jimfuller5309 10 місяців тому +6

    I've built many auto engines and have been amazed by these Merlins..Thank you for explaining the con rod bolt strech..simple enough. Amazing that they had this kind of reliabilty in the 40's. Those con rods look like art so nice and polished!

  • @CD-SU
    @CD-SU 10 місяців тому +3

    A well presented series on this iconic engine is in my 'looking forward to a new video' tag. Thanks Peter.

  • @ogaugeclockwork4407
    @ogaugeclockwork4407 10 місяців тому

    Wow, great content! Not staggering the cylinder blocks sure kicked off a lot of complexity with the connecting rods!

  • @Nicomlp
    @Nicomlp 10 місяців тому +7

    Thanks Peter for sharing your knowledge on this amazing engine.
    It is a pleasure to me looking at your videos.
    Very interesting to see the design of this engine and the engineering behind it, very skilled engineers back in the day.
    Nicolas

  • @MunDad
    @MunDad 9 місяців тому

    Enjoying these videos, very interesting. Even the bits of the merlin you don't usually see are a piece of artwork 👍

  • @keithgarland3404
    @keithgarland3404 10 місяців тому +3

    Nice to see how these amazing engines go together .

  • @brutter602
    @brutter602 10 місяців тому +1

    I have built WW2 V12 German Panther/Tiger tank engines (HL230). They use the same type of knife and fork con rods which are also machined all over. The main bearings are very large needle roller bearings that are oil splash fed .

  • @markchancellor-maddison5528
    @markchancellor-maddison5528 10 місяців тому

    Thanks Peter, really fascinating. What exceptional craftsmanship went into the making of all the parts. I was under the impression that the Halifax bomber had radial engines? I look forward to more videos.

  • @dreddwailing5505
    @dreddwailing5505 9 місяців тому

    I find these videos fascinating, I could watch videos of this rebuild in real time (I'm not complaining about the editing)

  • @preonmodel9906
    @preonmodel9906 10 місяців тому

    I used to build Perkins V12 diesels, the Challenger tank engine had head studs but the generator version was fitted with bolts..
    I can’t remember what torque settings but each one finished with a 90 degrees turn to stretch it.. That was done with a
    breaker bar and was hard work !
    Lovely to see the engineering on the Merlin thanks 🙏

    • @FlightEngineering1
      @FlightEngineering1  10 місяців тому +1

      Thanks! The CV12 is a great engine. It can make the same power as most Merlins with about 1 litre less displacement. Nearly 3 times heavier though!

  • @RobertLBarnard
    @RobertLBarnard 10 місяців тому +2

    This video came up on my feed, I had to go back and find the previous video first to get the background on the engine.
    It's really good to watch your technique and hear your explanation.
    Not being familiar with "stretch bolts" (I'm an electrical & software engineer), it's interesting to learn about their characteristics. Knowing they twist a little more with each re-tightening, imagining the grain of the forged bolt is a little unsettling (if I were flying behind one).

  • @kiiiisu
    @kiiiisu 10 місяців тому +1

    awesome stuff, that assembly looks insane compared regular car engine

  • @neilmchardy9061
    @neilmchardy9061 10 місяців тому +4

    When I saw the shells I thought they were worn out. But as you say they are not white metalled.

  • @patrickibex
    @patrickibex 10 місяців тому +2

    Nice informative video Peter.

  • @davidlawrencebanks4610
    @davidlawrencebanks4610 10 місяців тому +1

    Brilliant stuff, thank you

  • @transistor754
    @transistor754 9 місяців тому

    Good stuff! I learned a lot, thank you.

  • @wilburfinnigan2142
    @wilburfinnigan2142 10 місяців тому +3

    Damn..... no wonder it took so long to build a merlin!!!

    • @FlightEngineering1
      @FlightEngineering1  10 місяців тому +1

      Yep. 11,000 parts and it takes around 1300 hours to do a full rebuild to flight.

  • @arthurn9237
    @arthurn9237 9 місяців тому

    BLODY LUVLEY MATE I CAN'T REMEMBER IF I'VE EVER ACTUALLY SEEN THIS ASSEMBLY PROCESS PRIOR IN MY LIFE @70 THERE'S LOT'S I'VE LOST SO IT'S STILL A TREAT TO WATCH THIS AND THE AMAZING CRAFTSMANSHIP THAT WENT INTO THESE ☝️OR ANY EARLY AIRCRAFT MOTOR FROM THE EARLY YEARS MY GOD THE TOLERANCES HOW IN HELL DID THEY
    ACHIEVE SUCH PERCISION TGE PATIENCE AND DEDICATION TO THEIR CRAFT IS NO LESS COMMENDABLE

  • @richardmildon2020
    @richardmildon2020 6 місяців тому

    What a wonderful video

  • @ldiver61
    @ldiver61 9 місяців тому

    thanks nicely paced with explanatio s along the way

  • @jmumbauer
    @jmumbauer 10 місяців тому

    I love the detail in your videos, keep up the good work.

  • @burroaks7
    @burroaks7 10 місяців тому +2

    very cool

  • @panrierrr
    @panrierrr 8 місяців тому

    Top work sir!
    I happen to own the exact same torque wrench as you're using. Ipicked it up cheap at the Kempton Park swap meet about 15 years ago.
    Fella who sold it to me said it is from aviation industry.
    would you mind sharing some info on it please?
    Is it the same tool they used at RR when they made Merlins??
    That Engine is such a BEAUTYFULL piece of proper engineering!!
    They don't make 'em like that any more, right!! I thank you!!

  • @dennisthemenace8854
    @dennisthemenace8854 10 місяців тому

    Just found your channel outstanding work love it I will be binge watching 👍

  • @davidellis2021
    @davidellis2021 10 місяців тому +2

    Thanks Peter.

  • @boblund8444
    @boblund8444 10 місяців тому +3

    I thought you measured the amount of stretch with a special micrometer that has pointed ends and fits into the bolt ends.

    • @FlightEngineering1
      @FlightEngineering1  10 місяців тому +3

      You can do that, yes. That is how the Packard Merlin manual tells you to do it, but Rolls-Royce stayed with this method all the way through production.

  • @davidbamford4721
    @davidbamford4721 10 місяців тому

    I was surprised that where the slot in a nut is just past the pin hole, you tightened the nut even further, instead of packing the nut such a small amount.

  • @austinmaxi
    @austinmaxi 10 місяців тому +3

    Is the crank one solid forging or casting? or is it made up in segments and pressed together like some motor bike cranks were? reason i ask is the crank webs look like the journals come all the way through them and look like a different material to the crank web. (as if the journals were pushed in to the webs)

    • @FlightEngineering1
      @FlightEngineering1  10 місяців тому +5

      It`s a one-piece forging with hollow journals, so what you can see are just oil sealing caps.

  • @hotrodZack1948
    @hotrodZack1948 6 місяців тому

    I like using old tools, but have you had that torque wrench checked for calibration? Ive had old ones off by 20 pounds. And im talking snap on ones from the 1950s and that one looks older.

  • @DarrenPhillips001
    @DarrenPhillips001 10 місяців тому

    Excellent

  • @patrickradcliffe3837
    @patrickradcliffe3837 9 місяців тому

    When did they change this design con-rods? Other merlins I've seen have a different split con-rod design.

  • @fredblogs5801
    @fredblogs5801 9 місяців тому

    Top piston ring? When checking the taper on the top piston rings by putting two rings edge to edge against each other I found that the top mark did not correspond to the manual orientation diagram of the taper. This should have been reported up the line so wondered if you had come across this?

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 9 місяців тому

    On an engine like that you should use all new bolts

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 9 місяців тому

    Who's the crankshaft end machines ? I have so many questions but I don't know anything about that engine...

  • @wf770
    @wf770 5 місяців тому

    I have a Cromwell converted merlin in pieces looking for a new home

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 9 місяців тому

    Where are the bearings ?

  • @fredblogs5801
    @fredblogs5801 10 місяців тому

    You should mention how the main bearings are in-line bored and the use of plasi gauge. No off the shelf ready to go bearings for these. I know the horrible bedstead like engine stand you are talking about. We also had a lot better one that wrapped around the block giving a lot lot better access.

  • @MonkPetite
    @MonkPetite 10 місяців тому

    Ain’t they meteor engine parts ?

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 9 місяців тому

    The torque wrench spring is probably so old and inaccurate

  • @classic_britain
    @classic_britain 10 місяців тому +1

    I sent you a email not sure if you got it

    • @FlightEngineering1
      @FlightEngineering1  10 місяців тому +1

      You did, and I forgot to reply...sorted now!

    • @classic_britain
      @classic_britain 10 місяців тому

      @@FlightEngineering1 No worries I know your a busy chap!

  • @damianbrennan2258
    @damianbrennan2258 10 місяців тому

    U should flex gauge to check clearance

    • @FlightEngineering1
      @FlightEngineering1  10 місяців тому

      It`s not common practice on these. They have larger clearances than a modern engine and the journals and bearings are measured.

    • @daleolson3506
      @daleolson3506 9 місяців тому +1

      If you measure the crank journal and the bearing there is no need to plastic gauge.

  • @n.b.p.davenport7066
    @n.b.p.davenport7066 9 місяців тому

    Not criticizing but it doesn't look like you too sure of yourself