The Genius Aero Trick That F1 Copied from Concorde

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 лип 2024
  • Thanks to the following channels, go check them out!
    FORMULA 1 / formula1
    wickedender / wickedender
    ITM Instruments Inc. / @itminstrumentsinc
    Gordon Roxburgh / gordonroxburgh
    Autosport / autosportdotcom
    flugsnug / flugsnug
    Speed Physics / speedphysics
    Mercedes-AMG Petronas Formula One Team / mercedesamgf1
    Top Gear / topgear
    Goodwood Road & Racing / goodwoodrrcc
    Vlad Demissov / bleifusssss
    Theodoor29 / theodoor29
    F1 Fans / @f1fans226
    RaceFans / racefans
    Look at these strange vapour trails coming off the rear wing of these F1 cars. They are only visible in certain conditions but are present whenever the car is at speed. It’s the effect that enables flies to fly, and the Concorde to reach such high speeds.
    They are called Vortices, and are a natural bi-product of an F1 car’s wings. They produce a lot of drag and ultimately slow the cars down.
    ➤ Subscribe for more incredible motorsport: goo.gl/AbD2f9
    So how do you create Vortices?
    This is actually easier to explain with a plane wing. As you probably know, a plane wing creates lift by using a low pressure area above the wing - this then literally sucks the plane upwards.
    You can see the low pressure area here, where the cloud-like vapour is above the wing. You’re only able to see this in certain conditions, but we will get to that.
    But the interesting thing is that at the edges, this creates a strange effect. The air here is able to spill around the edges of the wing, and so, the air from below the wing is sucked around the side by the lower pressure air.
    This creates a tumbling, turning effect - starting a spiral of air that creates a mini-tornado, that trails off the wing. This is what we call a vortex.
    For planes the vortices are a bad thing, they produce a lot of drag - but are often unavoidable as they are a natural bi-product of having a wing - and you need those.
    They are also naturally created on an F1 car. Back in the 80s and 90s, you could see them trailing off the rear wing, sometimes up to a metre long. The rear wing produces about 30% of the drag of an F1 car, and this is part of the reason.
    ➤Follow us on:
    ➤ Instagram- @official_driver61 - bit.ly/D61Insta
    ➤TikTok - @official_driver61 - bit.ly/D61TikTok
    📺 F1 Driver’s Technique Explained
    ➤ Senna’s bizarre technique: bit.ly/3lORK59
    ➤ How Schumacher’s style won 7 championships: bit.ly/3527cVz
    ➤ Alonso’s strange steering: bit.ly/2Z7a93v
    ➤ How Verstappen will be F1 champion: bit.ly/3jK6L6n
    ➤ How Verstappen is so fast in the wet: bit.ly/32WMVhr
    📺 F1 Engineering
    ➤ How F1 brakes work: bit.ly/3h0Whh0
    ➤ How an F1 clutch works: bit.ly/3i0oDJM
    ➤ What’s inside an F1 gearbox: bit.ly/2DzMqRW
    ➤ How F1 teams change four tyres in two seconds: bit.ly/2QVpkIl
    🏎️ Track & Racing Driver!
    ➤ Get a free report on your track driving: bit.ly/2LmYNBA
    ➤ Get faster on track with our FREE 25-part tutorial series:bit.ly/2PypIMK
    ➤ Our real-world training programmes: bit.ly/2ktjtgV
    🏁 Sim Racers!
    ➤ My sim wheel: bit.ly/354BBlY
    ➤ My sim pedals: bit.ly/3eJckQo
    ➤ Our sim racing course: bit.ly/34WuV7p
    ➤ Get a free report on your track driving: bit.ly/2LmYNBA
    ➤ Driver61 Sim Racing Channel: bit.ly/2BMdk4B
    #Formula1 #Aerodynamics #Engineering
    00:00 Vortex - An Aerodynamic Accident
    00:39 How Vortices Are Created
    01:33 How Vortices Affect F1 Cars
    02:00 F1 Engineers - The Last Airbenders
    02:45 Deliberate Vortices
    03:44 Rear Wing Vortices
    04:30 Genius Aero Trickery
    05:13 Fuel For Fans Black Friday Sale!
    06:40 Do Vortices Make a Difference?
    06:40 Why Can Only See Them In Certain Conditions?
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 499

  • @Driver61
    @Driver61  3 роки тому +116

    Go check out Fuel For Fans' Black Friday Sale with the link in the description! Would love to hear what you ordered!
    Did you know these vortices were this important? It's an amazing thing to see! If you want to see more, go watch the 2020 Turkish GP again!

    • @DanceySteveYNWA
      @DanceySteveYNWA 3 роки тому +6

      Nice content, very informative

    • @thesunnynationg
      @thesunnynationg 3 роки тому +1

      F1 Explained is one of youre best series almost as good as your driving school thing i watched 3 years ago when i heard about your channel.
      I also promoted your channel back then on some sim racers streams because it is such a great value for the (Sim) Racing world.
      Thank you very much for making me a much faster and better driver since then.

    • @thesunnynationg
      @thesunnynationg 3 роки тому

      Even on the road im much more aware of my surroundings. 👍👍👍

    • @khairulikhwan4908
      @khairulikhwan4908 3 роки тому

      Why this video no subtitles?

    • @francescoindolfo
      @francescoindolfo 3 роки тому

      Is the code still valid?? I ve noticed that in the checkout it s accepted but the price remains the same

  • @carholic-sz3qv
    @carholic-sz3qv 3 роки тому +951

    F1 technology is just a whole other level of magic in automobile

    • @tony_5156
      @tony_5156 3 роки тому +19

      Koenigsegg tech is like close to or on par with F1 tech, they’re always just pushing engineering to its sheer limits wherever they can.

    • @alangriffin8146
      @alangriffin8146 3 роки тому +4

      They’re deamons, just like David Blaine.

    • @deadline0018
      @deadline0018 3 роки тому +18

      @@tony_5156 Aston Martin made a car that laps as fast as an f1 car (exploiting the technology that’s BANNED in f1) Valkyrie

    • @rouge5140
      @rouge5140 3 роки тому +12

      Unless the FIA bans that tech

    • @walangchahangyelingden8252
      @walangchahangyelingden8252 3 роки тому +3

      @@rouge5140 Ain't that the truth.

  • @DJRD555
    @DJRD555 3 роки тому +427

    Shout out to whoever did the animations and models ...

  • @cjgordon22
    @cjgordon22 3 роки тому +697

    The aero of a f1 make something like a nascar seem like fred flintstone's car lol

    • @slimyelow
      @slimyelow 3 роки тому +37

      Hey, don't knock old Fred now !

    • @cjgordon22
      @cjgordon22 3 роки тому +38

      Top league actually uses fuel injection now but all lower classes are carbed. Kinda pathetic considering most cars were f.i. in the mid to late 80s

    • @cjgordon22
      @cjgordon22 3 роки тому +1

      @SD Alexander in 2012 they started running it

    • @frostyab7579
      @frostyab7579 3 роки тому +1

      what do you mean "seems like" - IT IS!

    • @user-gu1hl2kx2k
      @user-gu1hl2kx2k 3 роки тому +2

      @SD Alexander and push rod engines lol

  • @tbz1551
    @tbz1551 3 роки тому +224

    LOVE this kind of content! It’s these kind of details that make this sport so fascinating imo.

    • @tonywright8294
      @tonywright8294 3 роки тому

      T BZ tosser

    • @tbz1551
      @tbz1551 3 роки тому +5

      @@tonywright8294 ...weak. If you’re gonna troll someone at least make an effort.

  • @undytermined
    @undytermined 3 роки тому +56

    coming from a flight instructor, well explained on how aerodynamics and the vortices work! drag is always a byproduct of lift! (induced drag that is)

    • @gypsykingg
      @gypsykingg 3 роки тому

      You probably just got your student pilot cert - calm down buddy.

    • @dannenp3110
      @dannenp3110 3 роки тому +11

      @@gypsykingg someone's jealous anyone else has more ratings than them

    • @gypsykingg
      @gypsykingg 3 роки тому

      @@dannenp3110 - I don't know of many active flight instructors with multiple, if any at all, type ratings. Yeah, I'm jealous.

    • @Sandux930
      @Sandux930 3 роки тому

      Contrails!
      /s

    • @gz3zbz
      @gz3zbz 3 роки тому +8

      I did not like his phrasing at 0:56 about how a vacuum literally sucks the plane upward. A vacuum cannot exert a force. As an experiment, place your coffee cup on the table in front of you and place your hands either side just touching the cup. Move one hand away. Result - the cup stays where it was. Now put your hands back on the cup and push equally with each hand so that the cup stays still. While still pushing, move one hand away (this is easier to do with two people). Result - the cup moves towards the hand that is moving away (the low pressure side) - not because that hand is moving away but because now the other hand is exerting a force. In the same way, low pressure regions cannot exert a force on a wing - the force is applied by the high pressure region. It's contact with atmospheric gas molecules bouncing off the wing that is pushing it.

  • @mrrolandlawrence
    @mrrolandlawrence 3 роки тому +249

    wow what a segway. linus would be proud.

    • @Kraven83
      @Kraven83 3 роки тому +21

      Segue* from latin

    • @havinashasirwathan6750
      @havinashasirwathan6750 3 роки тому +18

      this video has been brought to you by tunnel bear. Tunnelbear is the simple vpn app that makes it easy to browse privately and enjoy a more open internet. With tunnelbear turned on, your connection via landline or Wi-Fi is secured and your online activity is kept private from your internet provider advertizers, hackers and anyone else who's trying to track you or profit from your data. They have a top rated privacy policy and they do not log your activity and you can try it for free, with 500 megabytes of free data and no credit card required over at the link in the description. And, if you choose to get an unlimited plan you can save 10 percent by going to tunnelbear.com/LTT also linked in the video description

    • @MudhaffarAdhwa
      @MudhaffarAdhwa 3 роки тому +33

      Yeah that was pretty good, but you know what else is good? Ridge wallet

    • @tristanvanderveen7313
      @tristanvanderveen7313 3 роки тому +2

      @@MudhaffarAdhwa This segway is on another level, just like me on Ark: Survival evolved

    • @HilbertXVI
      @HilbertXVI 2 роки тому +2

      SEGUE* not SEGWAY. The latter is a two-wheeled self-balancing personal transporter.

  • @MKUMBRA
    @MKUMBRA 3 роки тому +25

    transition to the ad was smoother than the air over the center of the wing

  • @migy5031
    @migy5031 3 роки тому +72

    Standing trackside as an F1 car goes by you can totally feel the effect of the aero package and engine intake/exhaust! (Especially before turbo era)
    Unforgettable experience!

    • @MeatBallFreak333
      @MeatBallFreak333 3 роки тому

      How old are u? Turbos are very old in f1 u mean hybrid era?

    • @migy5031
      @migy5031 3 роки тому +4

      @@MeatBallFreak333 Yes, I meant the current PU. ✌️

    • @adamfanning9412
      @adamfanning9412 2 роки тому

      @@MeatBallFreak333 turbos were banned from 89-2013

  • @thejaiz8564
    @thejaiz8564 3 роки тому +234

    Could you make a video on Leclerc's driving style? Would be interesting for me.
    Or maybe analysis of what has happened to Bottas this season hehehe.

    • @marcoslukaz5178
      @marcoslukaz5178 3 роки тому +1

      What happened to Bottas was he was never meant to be a second driver

    • @shantanurawat1599
      @shantanurawat1599 3 роки тому +2

      he has a normal one i guess

    • @qvor1996
      @qvor1996 3 роки тому +25

      @@shantanurawat1599 no such thing as "normal" driving style. Everyone has their touch. Schumi had brilliant throtle control. Alonso had this aggressive turn-in. Lewis likes the car more understeery. Kimmi likes the car more oversteery. And so on. I think Charles has a mixture of excelent throtle control and good understeer managment. But he has much more to learn, its just his 3rd season so he can grow into some other type of skillset.

    • @arthurlima176
      @arthurlima176 3 роки тому +17

      @@qvor1996actually schumi controlled the steering wheel, doing a Lot of micro corrections per Second, and Senna was recognized for his throtle control

    • @qvor1996
      @qvor1996 3 роки тому +3

      @@arthurlima176 this is true but I also have heard about schumi being very helpfull to the rnd team with his feedback about the throtle response so thats why I said what I said

  • @TheJamonLance
    @TheJamonLance 3 роки тому +72

    talks about how vortex makes the car faster.
    shows an image of a mclaren slower than a gp2

    • @karelpgbr
      @karelpgbr 3 роки тому +1

      Nice one mate

    • @stevenfrench9455
      @stevenfrench9455 3 роки тому +1

      It still has the aerodynamics to produce the vertices

    • @fk4410
      @fk4410 3 роки тому +1

      Gp2 engine... nice

  • @qasimmir7117
    @qasimmir7117 3 роки тому +1

    Not just control of vortices, but many technologies have been derived from Concorde. Carbon-ceramic brakes, active brake cooling, fly-by-wire, digital computer control from sensor inputs, active weight trimming, etc. Concorde really was the pinnacle of technology, dare I say, still is…

  • @andre_star7776
    @andre_star7776 3 роки тому +3

    I already knew that F1 engineers were very smart, but i never thought that they were THAT smart

  • @richardlehoux
    @richardlehoux 3 роки тому +7

    I'm maybe mistaking but I think that the Lotus shown spinning were the one from around 1985 and had no ground effect of the same type has the one with skirts.

  • @mrbeans2425
    @mrbeans2425 2 роки тому +1

    I just LOVE how PRECISE their engineering is! Those Vortex's are sooo tight, its insane how they control the airflow like they do. Every single CM of a wing or fin has a purpose.

  • @toddb930
    @toddb930 3 роки тому

    That is some serious magic there!! Thanks for explaining some of those concepts. And the examples/animations in the video were awesome.

  • @Ulisseseabra
    @Ulisseseabra 3 роки тому +1

    This was one of the best techinical F1 videos i have ever seen in my life! Awesome explanation !

  • @Bl4ckDe4th88
    @Bl4ckDe4th88 3 роки тому +3

    Of course turbulent air can stay attached. It‘s much better at doing that than laminar airflow. However, dirty air and turbulence are two different things

    • @laurencedawson7754
      @laurencedawson7754 3 роки тому +1

      Agree to an extent, but doesn't turbulent air generally form when attachment breaks down, often through too aggressive a shape or too high angle of attack?

    • @Bl4ckDe4th88
      @Bl4ckDe4th88 3 роки тому

      @@laurencedawson7754 no, that‘s detached flow. Air (or another liquid for that matter) becomes turbulent and more energetic above a certain Reynolds number. I think it‘s between 3 and 4k, but don‘t quote me on that. So if you have laminar flow and just make it way faster it‘ll become turbulent

    • @laurencedawson7754
      @laurencedawson7754 3 роки тому

      @@Bl4ckDe4th88 kind of, if you are talking about the classic pipe situation or between two surfaces (for example the road and underside of a car) but the dimensions of the pipe or distance between the surfaces are factors and so you are back to the aggressiveness of the shape/ gap for the velocity range you are aiming to work in. The transistion is always related to dimensions, in a hypothetical pipe of infinite diameter, there would be laminar flow at any velocity.

    • @Bl4ckDe4th88
      @Bl4ckDe4th88 3 роки тому +1

      @@laurencedawson7754 I guess that's right, but talking about realistic examples a fluid becomes turbulent above a certain Reynolds number, which is linked to the velocity.
      Going back to your fist statement, you're probably right, that turbulence forms, if there are aggressive shapes or a stall. But it (realistically) also happens above a certain speed. And that air can stay attached. It won't in the case of a stall, but generally turbulent air isn't being detached just because it's turbulent.
      And I don't even think dirty air can't stay attached, it's just hard to controll and creates massive amounts of drag. That together with the fact, that it's hard to calculate it's behaviour is most likely why F1 tries to get rid of it.

    • @laurencedawson7754
      @laurencedawson7754 3 роки тому +1

      @@Bl4ckDe4th88 great chatting with you, I find the aero aspects fascinating.....I think I remember an Adrian Newey where he states that even through the slow corners at Monaco , aero is still the most important factor!

  • @BoltonLadnScouser
    @BoltonLadnScouser 3 роки тому +1

    dude, your transitions into the ads get smoother and smoother. Bravo.

  • @jimmyneutron1889
    @jimmyneutron1889 3 роки тому +4

    This channel keeps getting better and better

  • @jackmclane1826
    @jackmclane1826 3 роки тому

    These was a magnificent collection of exquisite high speed footage capturing a hard to capture physical phenomenon! Brilliant work!

  • @TR12365
    @TR12365 3 роки тому +19

    Vapour trails are also McLaren’s logo.

    • @ChrisTheGregory
      @ChrisTheGregory 3 роки тому

      I believe they're also the "apostrophes" sometimes seen around the 'Tyrell' logo.

    • @n8pls543
      @n8pls543 3 роки тому

      McLaren's logo is a hyper-stylized kiwi bird, like they used to put on Bruce McLaren's cars, since he was from New Zealand.

  • @PortuguesePirate99
    @PortuguesePirate99 3 роки тому +2

    Your videos are really useful when trying to make my non F1/racing/technical friends understand these type of things haha, i do also occasionaly learn interesting stuff from you too

  • @skwisgaarskwigelf331
    @skwisgaarskwigelf331 3 роки тому +7

    The editing is just incredible!

  • @jeffwood2350
    @jeffwood2350 3 роки тому

    Excellent video, You did a perfect job explaining how the individual elements work.

  • @quirinonavarro1857
    @quirinonavarro1857 3 роки тому

    Congratulations man!! You have the specific way of speaking of the person that understands completely what are talking about... saludos desde México.

  • @kidoctane
    @kidoctane 3 роки тому +2

    Awesome - takes me back to my thermo/fluids lectures when I was at Uni.......love it to see how the theory has been applied

  • @kadir801
    @kadir801 3 роки тому

    Thanks for these wonderful videos . Understanding the physics behind these incredible machines fascinates me .

  • @VMVarga-yf6eg
    @VMVarga-yf6eg 3 роки тому

    X
    Cool video, simple explanations and basic diagrams made it easy to understand. Love this type of content

  • @westoniii
    @westoniii 3 роки тому

    Nothing like take off in a 4 blade c130 in a cold, damp condition. The corkscrew was visible and very cool to watch and make sense to read the performance manual.

  • @topiasr628
    @topiasr628 3 роки тому

    I can't believe I've only not found this channel. I'm hooked. Such brilliant (and actually informative!!) content !

  • @ameunier41
    @ameunier41 3 роки тому

    That video was so we'll made, the explanation were simple with a good pace and somehow they managed to go in depth.

  • @Samuel-gc6js
    @Samuel-gc6js 3 роки тому +1

    Vortex lift was actually only used to provide lift at take off and landing. Once above a certain speed the Concorde wing acted like a normal wing and generated lift in a normal convention :)

  • @hans-jurgenpeters5614
    @hans-jurgenpeters5614 3 роки тому +1

    "F1 Engineers - The Last Airbenders"
    Nickelodeon should make a TV series out of it :D
    Great Video as always, Scott!

  • @GTChucker86
    @GTChucker86 3 роки тому

    if you notice in the F2004’s rear wing you could see its moulded to slope down right beside the end plates in an attempt to minimize the drag and create less vortices.
    The second gen Ferrari powered A1GP cars also had this rear wing design as they are directly based off the F2004 specifically.
    Some F1 teams still use this too particularly Mclaren

  • @LaggerSVK
    @LaggerSVK 3 роки тому +1

    Art of aerodynamics. Really great explanation and straight to the point!

  • @Chuck59ish
    @Chuck59ish 3 роки тому +16

    Isn't Fluid Dynamics great? Formula E and Indycar have done something about the wheel vortexs with the semi enclosed wheels on their cars, but F1 will be going the other way with the 18-inch wheels again.

    • @ThePgR777
      @ThePgR777 3 роки тому +3

      Thats the rim, but the tyre size is the same

    • @zvexevz
      @zvexevz 3 роки тому +8

      The new regulations, delayed until 2022, will have blades running over the front tyres in a similar way to the Indycar design, in order to control the tyre wake while creating less dirty air. Many of the vortexes discussed in this video create dirty air, and make it hard for cars to follow closely behind each other, making overtaking much more difficult. You can read more about it here: motorsport.tech/formula-1/f1-2021-regulations-overview-by-craig-scarborough

    • @Chuck59ish
      @Chuck59ish 3 роки тому +3

      @@ThePgR777 Which means that they will have to a suspension again instead of depending on the tires to be the suspension.

    • @xm210c
      @xm210c 3 роки тому +3

      F1 doesn't have a problem with developing fast cars. F1 has a problem with slowing down development enough with onerous restrictions to keep the sport relatively safe.
      The speed cars go at, velocities drivers are exposed to and the materials and shapes the cars are made up of can't outpace safety. That's the reason next year's F1 is going to have significant restrictions on how to generate downforce. Cars are getting too fast.

    • @BigCat553
      @BigCat553 3 роки тому

      @@Chuck59ish Driver61 made a video about f1 suspension ua-cam.com/video/FNepYY7KxaA/v-deo.html

  • @ianturner7635
    @ianturner7635 3 роки тому +1

    Great videos with good explanations. I would just add that vortices don’t create drag, they are a manifestation of the pressure difference. Drag is a combination of friction and pressure forces on rearward facing surfaces. Rw gills for example reduce drag by reducing high pressure on the wing upper surface. This means less pressure difference hence s smaller tip vortex is the result not the cause of less drag.

  • @higor_alpha_romeo
    @higor_alpha_romeo 3 роки тому

    AMAZING video!!! I love aviation and Formula 1. I always saw this particular similarities between aviation and F1 when we talk about the wings.

  • @JL-cn1qi
    @JL-cn1qi 3 роки тому +14

    This is also why you see those upwards fins at the wingtips of passenger airliners .

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 3 роки тому +3

      Winglets

    • @faatihh1130
      @faatihh1130 3 роки тому

      didnt they add the winglet because of an xb-70 collided with an f-104?

    • @pelee1966
      @pelee1966 3 роки тому +1

      No, actually it is the opposite, because winglets reduces vortexes. Winglets create more drag but makes the the wings more efficient and can lift more.

  • @filipemelosilva
    @filipemelosilva 2 роки тому

    That's incredible, shows vortex in Interlagos, they also produce a particular sound when you are there

  • @alcasey6548
    @alcasey6548 3 роки тому

    Great videos. Very well presented and discussed. It’s great getting your insights. Thanks.

  • @manudlamini6963
    @manudlamini6963 3 роки тому +1

    Driver61 thank you for explaining the concept I'vee always wanted to know why f1 car do that and you've helped thanks!!!!!!

  • @DxBang3D
    @DxBang3D 3 роки тому

    About the little curved tips on the airplane wings as seen on most modern big planes today, those are "vortex killers". I remember as a kid I used to create those tips on paper-planes to make them more stable.

  • @HighLiner15
    @HighLiner15 3 роки тому +2

    You should check the Vortex that come off a dirt Sprint Car where the stream of white compressed air comes directly at cockpit and drivers helmet. Looks amazing from the seat!! 😁🤙🏁🏎

  • @Vellzthedragon
    @Vellzthedragon 7 місяців тому

    i'm hoping on designing cars when i'm older and your videos help me so much. please keep making these videos

  • @joshuarosen6242
    @joshuarosen6242 3 роки тому

    I had never bothered to think about exactly what causes vortices. Your explanation was clear and logical. Since we are talking about fluid dynamics, I have to wonder where anything clear and logical is actually correct but I like your explanation and I'll assume it's correct for the time being.

  • @Morphasella
    @Morphasella 3 роки тому

    Very good knowledge amongst other UA-cam.
    Keep up the good work!

  • @Marc-ze9me
    @Marc-ze9me 3 роки тому

    As always, super interesting and easy to understand content!

  • @conorjones5093
    @conorjones5093 3 роки тому

    Well you can use turbulent air to control flow, but it has to be attached to the surface so you have to expedite transition the air from laminar to turbulent flow. This allows the turbulent flow to reattach post transition and can help!

  • @smartin2174
    @smartin2174 3 роки тому

    Oh this is what those fins and little blades on the floor are for. Wow, that is impressive!

  • @adrianjabs5752
    @adrianjabs5752 3 роки тому

    Thx really interesting that low pressure condensation and vortex also involves " Cavitation " but I'm not an aero engineer would be fascinating to understand blown diffuser ! Great stuff !👍

  • @vaggelisgian
    @vaggelisgian 3 роки тому +3

    0:11 I bet the mosquito got so mad about you calling it a fly, that it didn't let you sleep for a week

  • @BrandonKent136
    @BrandonKent136 3 роки тому +1

    Be careful with how you use the word "turbulence." Technically turbulent flows (higher reynolds number) increases L/D

  • @magikjoe3789
    @magikjoe3789 2 роки тому

    Excellent FlugSnug aircraft used footage here, Birmingham Airport is a great place to see vortices in action.

  • @lolvks
    @lolvks 3 роки тому +5

    So, what did F1 engineers copy from Concorde?

    • @eeeeeek
      @eeeeeek 3 роки тому +2

      droop snoot

    • @DanM012324
      @DanM012324 3 роки тому

      The shape of Concordes wing was designed to manage vortices to reduce drag while also keeping lift.

    • @clapetto
      @clapetto 3 роки тому +2

      @@DanM012324 As it is done for any other aircraft. Concorde did not have some particular tech in that regard, or at least not something F1 could copy.

  • @liom442
    @liom442 3 роки тому +6

    that sponsorship segway though

    • @Kraven83
      @Kraven83 3 роки тому +1

      Segue* from latin

  • @jjmac3561
    @jjmac3561 3 роки тому

    I remember seeing that effect around 1969 at Ingliston with Willie Forbes F5000 car on the back straight.

  • @Kraven83
    @Kraven83 3 роки тому +5

    5:15 that masterful segue would make Linus from Linus Tech Tips proud! 🤣

  • @MJTbreww
    @MJTbreww 3 роки тому +8

    Awesome graphics!

  • @diogoje20
    @diogoje20 3 роки тому +1

    Hey, Driver61!
    I really liked this video, because I’m into F1 and aerodynamics. Also, I’m an aerospace engineer, and during the video, I was hopping you would specifically explain how they induce the inverted vortices to cancel the other ones. Furthermore, I wanted to know if those vortices would reduce the downforce produced by the wings. I was hoping you could share with me those informations or tell me where did you get them, for me to discover a little more. Or even do a more detailed video.
    I thank you in advance and wish you good luck for the continuity of your great work! I’m a huge fan!

    • @Tacobeo
      @Tacobeo Рік тому

      You found the answer?

  • @escapevelocity8092
    @escapevelocity8092 3 роки тому

    You explain in fantastic clarity brilliant vids

  • @SpookyRipples9
    @SpookyRipples9 3 роки тому +25

    To grasp this you need to have a degree in Fluid Mechanics!

    • @oceanerondeau2133
      @oceanerondeau2133 3 роки тому +6

      That's my goal in life 😂 I'm studying aerospace engineering in order to have a full knowledge of fluids mechanics and thermodynamics at the same time, applied to fast moving objects !

    • @xSPARTANJ1x
      @xSPARTANJ1x 3 роки тому +1

      @@oceanerondeau2133 nice man! I’m currently doing a degree in Motorsport Engineering and we do a fair bit of aero and fluid mechanics in year 2 and 3 I think! And build cars of course 😂

    • @joseppedaia3673
      @joseppedaia3673 3 роки тому

      @@oceanerondeau2133 good luck with that :D don't know about america, but in germany you have to wait, till you work in exactly that specific field after your Master to have "full knowledge". But with the Basics you get 70% of the way ;)

    • @MrSpanks
      @MrSpanks 3 роки тому +2

      @@xSPARTANJ1x Nice one dude! Where are you studying? I studied in Swansea.
      I highly recommend spending as much time as possible in industry - e.g. volunteer with a race team (you never know, they might even pay you! They did me!). Club level race teams are often quite willing to take on an enthusiastic student who is prepared to do some work.
      All the best!

    • @MrSpanks
      @MrSpanks 3 роки тому +3

      ​@Eff yore Feelings Hey buddy.
      There are literally hundreds of race teams in the UK alone. However most are very small and run by the driver and a couple of mates (for example) and possess only basic equipment. Volunteering with such a team can still be a lot of fun and be greatly rewarding.
      Many championships, even at the lower end of sophistication, contain teams which run multiple cars and/or drivers. Such teams will employ mechanics etc and may take on volunteers to generally help.
      Then there are British championships such as BTCC, Clio Cup, F4, F3, GT's etc in which a lot of money is involved. As such there are often openings for competent folk and you can get paid for positions such as data engineer, race engineer, logistics, trucky as well as mechanic and general help.
      Facilities such as wind tunnels, due to costs, are limited to the top tier championship teams such as F1 and WEC and are also found at companies such as Lola, Prodrive, MSport, WIlliams Automotive etc. To be honest, the majority of employees at such companies will have progressed through higher education and have experience. But I'm sure that someone who displays the aptitude and determination does have a chance.
      Good luck and enjoy!

  • @4ll4nb31l
    @4ll4nb31l 3 роки тому

    great video here! can you also make one that explains the yellow paint procedure f1 teams do in free practise?

  • @themangix357
    @themangix357 3 роки тому +3

    Wish Fuel for Fans and Alfa Romeo had a partnership. Love Alfa's merch, but they aren't available over at FFF.

  • @darrylb5373
    @darrylb5373 3 роки тому

    Segway to sponsor was on point this video. Well done sir.

  • @CaptainCrunch99
    @CaptainCrunch99 3 роки тому

    Fascinating, and super graphic effects!

  • @jameswohler985
    @jameswohler985 3 роки тому

    This was an awesome explanation. Thanks

  • @fartlek1000
    @fartlek1000 3 роки тому

    All this knowledge of aerodynamics and the way they use it is actually the art.

  • @horvslvpercal5134
    @horvslvpercal5134 3 роки тому

    ah, finally i find something that explain this phenomenon, i have been trying to sort it out for a lot of time

  • @balazsbelavari7556
    @balazsbelavari7556 2 роки тому +1

    1:33 I would disagree with wing vortecies being unavoidable on planes as engineers put lots and lots time into getting rid of them. That landing plane in a sense has 2 sets of wings, one being the real wing and one being the flaps (meant to slow down the plane whilst greatly increasing lift). What we can see in that picture is that the only place these vortecies are made are the flaps of the airplane, as they can't have the parts wingtips can have to reduce these vortecies.
    There are lots of different ways to (mostly) get rid of these vortecies like tapered wings, wintgips that curve up or down or big bulging fuel tanks on the end of each wing that all stop high pressure air from the underside of the wing to get to the top of the wing around the wingtips

    • @onlyGGG
      @onlyGGG 2 роки тому

      Wingtip vortices are unavoidable. The induced drag from them may be minimised but they can never be eradicated.
      Circulation is a fundamental part of lift generation and without the vorticity you have no lift. You see patented objects claiming to prevent them but it is all lies.

  • @hsab5927
    @hsab5927 3 роки тому

    I love the way you do sponsering! great work

  • @Mysz138
    @Mysz138 3 роки тому

    Such great content, keep it up!

  •  3 роки тому

    btw the biggest vortex come off the flaps (only deployed during takeoff & landing to increase the wing area -> lift in low airspeed) not "wing itself".
    Cruising speed the airplane has to be efficient, that's why new planes has winglets to reduce vortex off the edge of the wing.

  • @sedric31
    @sedric31 3 роки тому

    i call this edutainment . its educational yet entertaining thanx mate

  • @officialWWM
    @officialWWM 3 роки тому

    Fantastic info. Thanks!

  • @nolegotube
    @nolegotube 3 роки тому

    Thanks so much!!! Great video as always!

  • @edwardharris9810
    @edwardharris9810 2 роки тому

    I know I’m just nitpicking but the clips of cars from the 80s used to highlight Ground Effect are mostly of the 1985 Lotus and Ground Effect was banned in 1983 so only the clip of the static lotus showing the skirts was a true Ground Effect car. As for the vortex it’s always amazing to see these coming off the cars particularly for real when at a race. Love the videos very informative as always (sorry to nitpic 😬)

  • @chrisberry6919
    @chrisberry6919 3 роки тому

    The principle you describe at 0:50 is not the cause of wings generating lift & helping planes to fly.
    The only thing required to generate lift in any wing is an angle of attack. The Bernoulli principle only makes them more efficient.

  • @LazyboyLP
    @LazyboyLP 3 роки тому

    It is actually not just the pressure that causes condensation. Air can only hold as much water at specific temperatures. As we know, accelerated air cools down (otherwise fans would lose their effect.) If you have a high relative humidity, and warm air, it can hold much more water. But when the air cools down, it loses the ability to hold that water. So the water needs somewhere to go and starts condensing and forming those droplets because the air cant hold the water anymore since it cooled down through the rapid acceleration over the wings. That is also why you see the "clouds" in front of the jet engines from planes because the air gets accelerated so fast.

  • @dianaandrade3251
    @dianaandrade3251 3 роки тому

    Can you talk about the 22’ rules about aerodynamic and also about 21’ new rules ? What’s the difference between each other and how does that help or hurt?

  • @yurimolotov5886
    @yurimolotov5886 3 роки тому

    Really good topic, thanks man

  • @davidorama6690
    @davidorama6690 3 роки тому +2

    Brilliant. Using vortices to block air from leaking from underneath the floor. 🤓

  • @rego23
    @rego23 Рік тому

    Thanks for this video. It is pure gold

  • @dresoriano5159
    @dresoriano5159 3 роки тому +6

    best Teacher I learned a lot ❤️

    • @andrejrockshox
      @andrejrockshox 3 роки тому

      You should learn where are comma and period on your keyboard.

  • @ronsmits9575
    @ronsmits9575 3 роки тому +1

    That was a great video! 👌

  • @nicomarroquin1998
    @nicomarroquin1998 3 роки тому

    Turbulent air in itself is not a bad thing to have, rather air that has gone through a boundary layer and has suffered a change in pressure compared to ambient air. Flow attachment is critical to avoid flow separation and wake, thus an increase in drag, that’s why in planes’ wings there are vortex generators, whose function is to increase drag and allow for better flow attachment as that is a function of the associated energy that the fluid has.

  • @88bimboGIGI
    @88bimboGIGI 3 роки тому

    Another great video!! Thanks

  • @shimarlie1
    @shimarlie1 3 роки тому

    You are an EXCELLENT teacher.

  • @davidm7824
    @davidm7824 3 роки тому

    The reason why you can see the vortices in humid weather is the moisture is being squeezed out of the air. cool huh

  • @cresbalundo8845
    @cresbalundo8845 3 роки тому

    The wind coming from the f1's wing makes it look like the car has spider-sense

  • @hennievangalen1603
    @hennievangalen1603 3 роки тому

    Vortex and condensed air or vapour trails are in a sense connected but not the same, like in that drag and downforce are not the same but have an indisputed relation. Aircraft and F1 both have to do with aerodynamics, although in different ways and with different goals.

  • @realblakrawb
    @realblakrawb 3 роки тому +1

    5:50 is deployed flap and wing blend issue. 4:06."wing fence?"

  • @Cake_Doge
    @Cake_Doge 3 роки тому

    Can someone enlighten me? Do vortexes create drag because it creates a low pressure "stream" behind the car which sucks the car back? Isn't this something natural that having high downforce results with?

  • @pauljrcarty9314
    @pauljrcarty9314 3 роки тому

    Porsche made the gemballa turbo inlet stock. It was just so good when came out. Cold air intakes had just become popular

  • @Miguel-mv5yc
    @Miguel-mv5yc 3 роки тому

    Great content but how does low pressure help in condensation? Isn’t that the opposite?

  • @duanezablocki8249
    @duanezablocki8249 3 роки тому

    I was always told that you needed about 8 cord distance between the bottom of a wing and another surface for the wing to think it's in clean air. When I watch these videos (great videos btw) I see that these f1 teams are not doing that, or at least they are maybe staggered enough that it doesn't matter? My thinking is in my world of winged sprint cars on dirt. We do have many rules on constricted construction of the wings (have to be one piece foil design) but the placement can very, like up or down in the nose wing which sits directly over body panels.

  • @nic-gk9br
    @nic-gk9br 3 роки тому

    brilliant explained 😎 thx 🙏

  • @maddox471
    @maddox471 2 роки тому +1

    Fun fact
    The vortices you can see on the rear wing is actually McLaren’s logo

  • @nipunkothare
    @nipunkothare 3 роки тому

    Here's an interesting fact: Drag forces increases with the square of velocity which makes aerodynamics so much more important in F1 cars.