Timestamps:- 0:00 Watch Dogs: Legion 0:30 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1:00 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1:30 Red Dead Redemption 2 2:00 Grand Theft Auto V 2:30 Cyberpunk 2077 3:00 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Stunning performance from the 680m, if they keep improving this further there will be a time when iGPUs will take away huge part of today's GPU sales/market👍 I don't even game much anymore but I'm still thinking of getting one of these RDNA2 equipped CPUs.
It's like MX 450 doing better if the game benefits from his faster RAM. Both CPU and GPU from AMD can add extra 20% performance from upgrade the ram that comes with the laptop.
@@renebaebae0600 It'll perform better but availability is a big issue & the price to performance increase isn't that good, instead I would buy a laptop with d-gpu. If you still want to go with just 680M, it would be wise to look for one which has already LPDDR5 or have it replaced at the time you buy.
@@Vasuli_bhoi thanks mate, i just bought a 680m ryzen 6800hs laptop (lenovo) for around $910 converted, with 16gb lpddr5 ram and 1tb of storage, do you think thats a good price? the one with dGPU is more expensive, i mean obv there are cheaper option but its mostly a dedicated gaming laptop and i dont want that as i plan to only do casual gaming
Thank you for posting these videos. I plan to buy a laptop this summer. I don't want a "gaming" laptop, but something all-around, not too heavy, good battery life (8+ hours productivity) with a great screen that I can reliably photo edit on. I do still want decent gaming performance, though. After watching lots of videos, I've come to the conclusion that a laptop with a 3050 might be the sweet spot. The 680m is really great for integrated graphics, but can't deliver 60fps in many recent games even on low settings. Now, once we see more 6800/6900 based laptops this summer, maybe I will change my mind depending on price and other variables like battery life. If I were buying right now, I might try something like the Asus Vivobook Pro 16X.
I had something similar in mind when buying my new laptop in December. Got the Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 16 with the 3050. Nice battery life. Somehow lighter and smaller then my old 15.6" gaming laptop. And a really nice 16:10 display.
@@1G1man1 what do you mean discrete is a strong word, I stated that the integrated graphics on amd is able to beat the mx450, im pretty sure the mx450 is a discrete gpu.
I have a question, I see that in the other game like gta 5, the witcher 3, and so on, the performance between mx 450 and rx 680m is similar, but in the red dead redemption 2, there was a significant of performance differences, how and why did this happen?
Hey there..should i wait for enough money to buy Lenovo legion 5 or buy now Lenovo IdeaPad gaming 3? The specs are the same..r5 5600h and rtx 3060.. the price of both laptop are different, about 700..my old laptop age is 6years now..kinda desperate need a new one now cuz of work..but i do need for gaming too
hi am using a laptopwith same spec as yours ( i5 1155g7 m 450 2gb and 8g b of ram , but sometimes a fps drop apper withhuge drop of gpu and 100 usage of cpu . i dunno whats the cause for this im really hoping for answers
R7 6800H IPC is better than i5 11th，in that situation RX680m still cant beat MX450，clearly MX450 it most economic choice，cheaper 40% but i love 1650mq more though，2023 i hope RTX4050 can replace the 1650 or 3050
In my case the vega 7 got a 15k Compute score in Geekbench (Stock 25W) and the average MX 330 get's 9.9k points but I assume if we go both CPU and GPU usage at the same time the APU will lose some power on it's GPU side.
@@PCSupportGamingTest MX330 is good only for old games, on new games vega 7 is far better, I had a MX350 and changed to 5700U with vega 8 and now I will never buy a geforce MX again.
The problem I have with the 680m is that it’s has a 50W tdp I kid you not. The mx450 has a max tdp of 25W. This performance per watt is obviously way better with the mx450. For reference I have the Alienware m15 r7 with the top tier ryzen 9 6900HX, and the 680m which has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the ryzen 7 6800h, drains the laptops battery as fast as if I just used the dedicated GPU on battery.
Timestamps:-
0:00 Watch Dogs: Legion
0:30 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
1:00 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1:30 Red Dead Redemption 2
2:00 Grand Theft Auto V
2:30 Cyberpunk 2077
3:00 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
The difference here is that the 680M is an integrated GPU while the 450MX is a dedicated one
Stunning performance from the 680m, if they keep improving this further there will be a time when iGPUs will take away huge part of today's GPU sales/market👍
I don't even game much anymore but I'm still thinking of getting one of these RDNA2 equipped CPUs.
In a video of rdna2 va GTX 1050, the igpu actually won the majority. The cpu of the 1050 was an i7 7700Q however
It's like MX 450 doing better if the game benefits from his faster RAM.
Both CPU and GPU from AMD can add extra 20% performance from upgrade the ram that comes with the laptop.
That is if you can get a ddr5 for a good price.
@@Vasuli_bhoi do you think the ryzen 680m will perform better if it is paired with 6400mhz lpddr5 ram?
@@renebaebae0600 It'll perform better but availability is a big issue & the price to performance increase isn't that good, instead I would buy a laptop with d-gpu. If you still want to go with just 680M, it would be wise to look for one which has already LPDDR5 or have it replaced at the time you buy.
@@Vasuli_bhoi thanks mate, i just bought a 680m ryzen 6800hs laptop (lenovo) for around $910 converted, with 16gb lpddr5 ram and 1tb of storage, do you think thats a good price? the one with dGPU is more expensive, i mean obv there are cheaper option but its mostly a dedicated gaming laptop and i dont want that as i plan to only do casual gaming
@@renebaebae0600 that's a really good price , what's your storage type? SSD or HDD?
Thank you for posting these videos. I plan to buy a laptop this summer. I don't want a "gaming" laptop, but something all-around, not too heavy, good battery life (8+ hours productivity) with a great screen that I can reliably photo edit on. I do still want decent gaming performance, though. After watching lots of videos, I've come to the conclusion that a laptop with a 3050 might be the sweet spot. The 680m is really great for integrated graphics, but can't deliver 60fps in many recent games even on low settings. Now, once we see more 6800/6900 based laptops this summer, maybe I will change my mind depending on price and other variables like battery life. If I were buying right now, I might try something like the Asus Vivobook Pro 16X.
Buy lenovo ideapad gaming 3 ryzen 5 5600h rtx 3050, it has very good battery backup
get the vivobook pro 14/15 , only 1650 but stil very nice for the price
I had something similar in mind when buying my new laptop in December. Got the Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 16 with the 3050. Nice battery life. Somehow lighter and smaller then my old 15.6" gaming laptop. And a really nice 16:10 display.
similar performance as MX450. it's gg
MX 450 so Powerfull,it's same like RDNA2(Radeon 680M)
its just the opposite rdna2 apu's got upgraded and now works like a discrete nvidia gpu
@@rameshravikumar9515 discrete is a strong word, MX450 graphics card for ultrabooks with minimal power consumption and low heat generation
@@1G1man1 what do you mean discrete is a strong word, I stated that the integrated graphics on amd is able to beat the mx450, im pretty sure the mx450 is a discrete gpu.
Pretty impressive for an Igpu but still mx450 takes the crown for me the price of getting a laptop with rdna2 as of now is no joke
Yes
A bit of a late response but yeah, those processors are reserved for mid to high-end ultrabooks. Too bad they don't put it in cheaper laptops
There's a huge difference in valhalla in amd favor.
Yes because of low vram in mx450
@@PCSupportGamingTest не совсем, assassin Valhalla делали совместо с компанией amd , следовательно оптимизации под amd будет лучше
@@РоманНосков-ж5я i didn't understand your language bro
@@PCSupportGamingTest This is the Russian language
@@PCSupportGamingTest Assassin Valhalla was made in collaboration with amd , so amd graphics cards show such a gap
I have a question, I see that in the other game like gta 5, the witcher 3, and so on, the performance between mx 450 and rx 680m is similar, but in the red dead redemption 2, there was a significant of performance differences, how and why did this happen?
It is due to optimization
Hey there..should i wait for enough money to buy Lenovo legion 5 or buy now Lenovo IdeaPad gaming 3? The specs are the same..r5 5600h and rtx 3060.. the price of both laptop are different, about 700..my old laptop age is 6years now..kinda desperate need a new one now cuz of work..but i do need for gaming too
Ideapad gaming 3,it has 5 hours to 6 hours battery life though
@@Hamox i play games usually with charger on..so the battery is not a big problem there
@@kyleshark4029 do not forget about cooling. This is essential, especially for laptops.
Legion 5 is better
@@kettlepotA2 true.. that's one of the reason i like legion 5 more
Can you do Radeon Rx 680m vs vega 8 in ryzen 7 5800h?
Yes
@@PCSupportGamingTest thank you dropped a sub 👍
hi am using a laptopwith same spec as yours ( i5 1155g7 m 450 2gb and 8g b of ram , but sometimes a fps drop apper withhuge drop of gpu and 100 usage of cpu . i dunno whats the cause for this im really hoping for answers
Ram single channel?
R7 6800H IPC is better than i5 11th，in that situation RX680m still cant beat MX450，clearly MX450 it most economic choice，cheaper 40% but i love 1650mq more though，2023 i hope RTX4050 can replace the 1650 or 3050
MX450 have GDDR6 and its dgpu, Radeon 680M just DDR5 and its iGPU
Which is better i5 10210u + MX 330 or Ryzen 5 5500u + Vega 7 ?
i5 + mx330 is better for gaming
In my case the vega 7 got a 15k Compute score in Geekbench (Stock 25W) and the average MX 330 get's 9.9k points but I assume if we go both CPU and GPU usage at the same time the APU will lose some power on it's GPU side.
@@PCSupportGamingTest MX330 is good only for old games, on new games vega 7 is far better, I had a MX350 and changed to 5700U with vega 8 and now I will never buy a geforce MX again.
@@andbotelho because of low vram
@@PCSupportGamingTest yes, low ram, low pcie bandwidth and without video output. the mx330 is same mx250/150 so the vega 7 is faster.
The problem I have with the 680m is that it’s has a 50W tdp I kid you not. The mx450 has a max tdp of 25W. This performance per watt is obviously way better with the mx450.
For reference I have the Alienware m15 r7 with the top tier ryzen 9 6900HX, and the 680m which has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the ryzen 7 6800h, drains the laptops battery as fast as if I just used the dedicated GPU on battery.
I don't think it's right to compare the internal graphics card with the external graphics card in this way.
Mx450 take 25w alone without CPU while 680m take 50w for the entire package CPU + GPU since its integrated. You are calculating wrong.
How much vram for 680m?
512mb
What if MX 550 or 570
Better performance than mx450
mx450 d6 vs 680m ?
Performance differs from games to games
Bro please upload ghost wire tokay amd Radeon R5 m330
Ok
MX450 have more points
But it has low vram and both these laptops r expensive I'd rather buy an rtx 3050 ot gtx 1650 ti than this
@@ardentanalyst2076 yeah it's sales now
DGPU vs IGPU
Still best RDNA2 dude....
@@yosukerechain2000 yes
Rdna should compete with 1650 not a 2gbmx450.
Temp rx 680m?
60-70℃
@@PCSupportGamingTest Thx! :)
Hii