Transferring power to the ground is the challenge. How do you determine the necessary depth? And then how do you measure the benefit of this operation?
Yeah I was wondering if another shank could be added then I saw the tracks slipping a bit. Those rippers are a hard pull. Engine power is there though.
That's a big old assed hood on that thing - must be a massive engine in below it. Despite how deep the ripper is, and the number of shanks, the tractor hardly seems to be breaking a sweat. Engine revs sound comparatively low too - should save on fuel useage.
A twin track of the same HP would run away from this. Why? just count all the gear boxes from the engine to the tracks. I bet these 100HP shy of pull at the draw bar. Good pan rig, not good for farming.
Comments like this crack me up. They’re ruining it 16 inches deep. See the wave and ground breaking up behind the ripper? There’s a lot of compaction. We run a 9 shank on our 620. Some of our fields it plays with it. Some fields it’s all it wants.
@@gregjames5070 forgive my ignorance. But 775hp is 775 hp. he stated they were traction limited. Altough it should be able to pull it faster anyways even if the slip increases.
![NEW 946 Hp or not? Case 715 Quadtrac will use the Vector V20? [Vector V20 vs JD X18 vs FPT C13/C16]](/img/n.gif)
Hello! The new Red Mean Machine easily doing the job.
Greetings from Portugal.
The new 715 Quadtrac is a beast!
Transferring power to the ground is the challenge.
How do you determine the necessary depth?
And then how do you measure the benefit of this operation?
Thanks for your impressive vide
The 715 could probably pull another 3 shanks.
Not at 16 inches. Had to bring it out to about 12 or it would just slip.
You could see a bit of slippage, I'd guess the snow doesn't help.
Surprised to see the 3 pt hitch.
Yeah I was wondering if another shank could be added then I saw the tracks slipping a bit. Those rippers are a hard pull. Engine power is there though.
You need a John Deere 9RX 830 then!
That's a big old assed hood on that thing - must be a massive engine in below it.
Despite how deep the ripper is, and the number of shanks, the tractor hardly seems to be breaking a sweat. Engine revs sound comparatively low too - should save on fuel useage.
I love ripping
What, at idle... LOL
A twin track of the same HP would run away from this. Why? just count all the gear boxes from the engine to the tracks. I bet these 100HP shy of pull at the draw bar. Good pan rig, not good for farming.
🤡🤣🤣
@@smylebutta7250 for some people ignorance is true bliss. words btw trump emoji's every time.
The 865C was originally planned for this ripper, it only spins with full ballast and is unsteerable
@@robertbanik7879 If it weights around the same as the 4 track pos you're a liar.
Case IH not Case.
why are you going so slow? it must be able to pull it faster with over 700 hp.
Traction/slip
Can it be weighted down more?
@@Hermiwallefrom 30,5t up to 34,5t it is possible
Comments like this crack me up. They’re ruining it 16 inches deep. See the wave and ground breaking up behind the ripper? There’s a lot of compaction. We run a 9 shank on our 620. Some of our fields it plays with it. Some fields it’s all it wants.
@@gregjames5070 forgive my ignorance. But 775hp is 775 hp. he stated they were traction limited. Altough it should be able to pull it faster anyways even if the slip increases.
I'd be more impressed with it pulling an 11 shank ripper
Partially frozen ground to some extent? Sure it would pull 11 just as well!
Depends on depth
Rippin semi-frozen ground is not the smartest idea and that is one of the reasons for track slippage.@@farminelectra
Compression springs on the ripper, bad engineering.