Ferrari 512M 1971 On Board Video
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 гру 2011
- Motorcollectors vous invite à vivre un moment intense à bord d'une Ferrari 512M de 1971 lors de la 2nde édition des Dix Mille Tours du Castellet par Peter Auto.
Retrouvez tout l'univers MotorHistory sur :
- le site web : www.motorhistory.fr
- la page Facebook : / motorhistory - Авто та транспорт
![4x Ferrari 512 M V12 Sound + Onboard on Spa ! [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/knE0aLHcuO0/mqdefault.jpg)
![ПОЛНАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ЭКЗОРЦИЗМА [Топ Сикрет]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qBySr6Bt0B8/mqdefault.jpg)
Just amazing , pure magic!!! Forever Ferrari, regarda from Italy and thank you so much for this video!!!
I love that he missed a shift at about 0:45! You could do that in those days, even the best drivers did once in a while.
Yep. I think Jo Siffert accidentally shifted from 3rd to 2nd instead of 4th down the Mulsanne straight at Le Mans 1970 in the middle of the night, it blew up the transmission and put them and the 917K out of the race!
Happened all the time. It was a combination of no gate and long and heavy linkages which were notorious for being imprecise.
There's also Damon Hill, who downshifted from 4th to 1st racing Nick Mason's Ferrari 250 GTO at the Goodwood Revival in 1999...
Best racing car sound ever and nice Ferrari :)
Nah 917k's sound is waaay better
This one is still great tho
I would love to drive this over pretty much any car. Truly beautiful singing engine, amazing tight looking gear box, RWD, no power steering (I'm guessing). ENough power that you really gotta work the old girl, be patient with the throttle (leg powered traction control). What an analog joy this would be
FINALLY A VIDEO OF GOOD FOOTAGE IN A 512M,
bravo to you driving it, really nice car and miles ahead of the 917 in quality, dispite being a heavier car, but really ,, who cares,
Im 512 NUT,,, AND always will be
sound power spreed quality, cockpit
who could do better,
Thanks sooo much for the fun of watching you drive my FAVORITE car,
Belllisima 512,
There are some videos of Bob Earle driving a 512M at Le Mans and a 512S at Monza. Bob’s a pretty good driver. I remember him from the 1980s.
love a 512 and a 917...then the Lola t-70's and Mirages ohh for Group C days again as well
What a monster, that sound, a masterpiece.
Damn. This is a pure passion. Pure passion. This is the epitome of a RACING car for me. It only went downhill since then.
What can i say? PURE MAGIC! That's what it is.
Music to my ears!
Tom Bernacki Of course for all fanatic motorsport !!!
Fantastic
Magnificent!!!
Great upload ! Thx for sharing.
Grazie per questo bel video.
According to the ACO speedtrap figures, a Ferrari 512M was the fastest car on the straight in qualifying for the 1971 Le Mans. It was clocked at 359 km/h (222 mph). Don't know which one it was but probably the NART one driven by Donohue/Hobbs.
TheThirdMan possibly could have been a NART one driven by Tony Adamowizch {sorry about the spelling Tony}
Quadrant14 Hi mate. I am excited to tell you -
*Mystery solved!*
As we suspected there is a discrepancy between the theoretical top speed and the achieved top speed for the 917. I suspected clutch slippage and while I was close, I was wrong. It can be very neatly explained by a phenomenon known as tyre slip:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slip_(vehicle_dynamics)
So, let's assume a ratio of about 1.1/1 and factor in some tyre slip.
224.4 (actual speed) x 1.1 = 246.84 (claimed speed from gearing charts). It also tallies with Derek Bell's claim that he was pulling X,000 RPM in top gear and that meant 246 mph. He wasn't factoring tyre slip into the equation.
Cheers!
TheThirdMan well done old man
Quadrant14 I want to stress that it's an _honest_ mistake. I said somewhere else that I didn't believe any of these guys was lying. Now that I've found a possible explanation which fits the numbers so neatly, the discrepancy becomes entirely understandable. Cheers!
TheThirdMan yes no problem, it is a good explanation as well...anyone can make errors depending on what actual information is available to them at any one time. You found good info too!
cheers mate
Watching this makes me want to go watch Le Mans!
i don't think they had ears after a while... LOL! deafened by that beautiful noise!
quelle bruit!!!! magnifique
We lost Tony a2z last October
Brain cancer..
See his web page for proper history of the car....
Look for a2z Racer..
Read Sam's book...
I miss talking with Tony..
Never dreamed on my my heroes would become a friend...
The internet!!
FORZA FERRARI !!
J.C.
375GTB F ❤
Bellissima macchina che, se ulteriormente sviluppata, avrebbe potuto dare grandissima soddisfazione alla Ferrari. Peccato....occasione persa.
Mario listed it as his favourite
lol good ol' alternator voltage tachs
Que som maravilhoso
I still cant get over how bad the tacs were back in the day. You have to wait a sec to find out what rev your at.
This guy's driving is just fine, you've obviously never shifted an older Ferrari. And I think we're all lost by your 'use all the road' comment, he drove the racing line correctly for this circuit all around. Get a life
GOOSE BUMPS!
Missing friend/heroTony a2z
FORZA FERRARI !!
Nothing ever sounds like a Ferrari v12 with carbs. Nothing.
the NART 512!!!
Scuderia fililinetti**
Does anyone know the mechanism behind those classic RPM counters? It's funny to see the neddle wobble around when there's a sudden "BAM" after upshifting and going full throttle, and im quite curious as to how such gauge worked, in mechanical terms. Anyone?
Don't quote me on this but I think it may work based off something along the lines of how much electricity the engine is producing so when it is at idle there is little electricity passing through the rpm display and when he shifts the power/rpm drops and suddenly comes back on, and since it is electric trinity driven the power somewhat surges. But I am in no way a well informed person, just my theory.
+João Agnelo Given the year of the vehicle I'm assuming it's a mechanically driven gauge. It's a very delicate mechanism and probably has little or no damping built into it. Without the vibration damping like modern gauges have the needle is allowed to 'freewheel' when shocked by a sudden change in RPM or a hard shift. Much like the rear wheel on a bicycle will when you stop pedaling.
Something to do with a 'drag cup', and eddy currents induced by a magnet rotating inside an aluminum cup (inside the tach); driven by a flexible cable, gear driven from the engine. No damping. Best engine sound, love the harmonics at higher flat out RPM!!
Man, The other cars just turn in to roadblocks when he presses the loud pedal
That transmission looks rough!
Well you don't need a rev counter to race properly a car, especially one with with such a great engine sound.
Musique !
geforce5700fx Oui !!!!!
Dampening?. Up through the 70's, all they had to use was mechanical tachs which were flaky under hard acceleration. Even up into the 80's dirt bikes and motorcycles had mechanical tachometers.Works basically the same as the old mechanical speedometers. No matter any refurbishing it will always do what your seeing.
Awesome...!!
Personally I like the 1967 3 valve 330P4 sound BETTER!
Similar rpm's but different!
From the T312 F1 engines...
I was about three guys back of the flagman, jumping up and down!
The striped T-shirt seen in the pics...
1-2-3 !!
Best Daytona 24 I ever saw!
Revenge for 1966!
J.C.
Naah, they weren't actually that bad back in the day! What usually happens is, when they go old the internal dampening in the instrument goes haywire. I have an old '71 motorcycle, and the damping is gone in those instruments aswell.
I bet a refurbished instrument wouldn't do it.
Magnificient car though! :D
seems she have 4 gear ? is that right ?
5
This is how you made a proper Ferrari V12. With the daymn V12! The current Ferrari 499 prototype with V6 TT Hybrid sounds like farts
The Last minutes of the movie “Le Mans” (even though Ferrari didn’t win).
he's not looking at the tach ;)
the sound closely resembles the old 80's f1 turbo v6 monsters
More like the f1 cars that were running v12's in the 70's
Brže ja golf5 tdi vozim po selu. (izuzev davanja gasa po pravcu)
Hi Guy,
go to the video of jurgen barth driving the 936 around the Sarthe in practice for the 77 race if you wanna see something incredible,
936 turbo is soo fast its hard to concentrate at that speed,
Jurgen was probably doing about 220 on the mulsanne.
Incredible.
No he isn't. Upshifting is easy (though he completely misses a shift at 49 seconds. On downshifts, he's not rev-matching properly (and sometimes he doesn't rev match at all and is dumping the clutch), and yes, racing gearboxes are not easy to shift. That's why we all go to racing school and learn on non-synchromesh gearboxes. You should hear crisp clean blips of the throttle on EVERY downshift.
If you watch in period onboards you hear that crisp clean blip - Ickx, Redman, Mass, Bell etc.
Wow…..an armchair World Champion joins the chat
@@jonelson1983 No, just a former instructor at the Jim Russell British School of Motor Racing and 2-time racing champion with a 47% win ration in auto races from Formula Fords to Sports Racers.
And here's a video of me NOT botching shifts:
ua-cam.com/video/4tZEyz6fI2w/v-deo.htmlsi=W5F-OPA8rrUZr9ZW
its no better than the 512 all the porsche had was a lighter desighn and full support from John Wyer engineering.
the poor 512 had to suffice with private owner's,
Enzo didnt give it factory support.
it was the time that Enzo was trying to support the sport's car and F--1 team at the same time, and something had to give.
SEFAC entered the 512S in 1970.
The refined 512M did not yet exist..
SEAFAC Ferrari would concentrate on the 312PB 1971 on...
FIAT money!
GULF Wyer was NOT Porsche Stuttgart!
Tho very well supported..
Martini was also involved...behind the Stuttgart cars...
History!
i think they generally used their ears :L
Like a Mozart Concert....
Great sound. Meh driving, remedial gearbox training is in order. When you're trying not to break your priceless car, you should actually drive it better and smoother and use all the road properly rather than doing what you're doing there.
His shifting is almost perfect? It's not like a modern day gear box, these things arn't easy to shift.
Precisely!
Old gear box are best than new