Why 3D Printing Struggles with Curved Surfaces
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- Curved surface finishes on 3D printed parts can often be challenging, especially with the appearance of layer lines as the part moves up the curve. In this video, we explain why these layer lines appear more distinct and guide you through some solutions that will help you improve the appearance of your parts.
If you would like to learn more about how to change your approach towards manufacturing products with Mass Production 3D Printing, make sure to SUBSCRIBE to Slant 3D!
#3dprinted #designfor3dprinting #caddesign #3dmodeling #3dprintingcommunity
🔗 IMPORTANT LINKS 🔗
Get a Quote for Your Production Project: www.slant3d.com/
Slant 3D Etsy Plugin: www.slant3d.co...
Get Our STL's: www.angled.xyz/
Get Affordable High-Quality Filament: www.tangledfil...
Try Shapr3D (Use Code: Slant3d): www.shapr3d.co...
Our Favorite Products: www.amazon.com...
About Slant 3D
🏭 High-Volume 3D Printing: Scalability Meets Flexibility
Slant 3D's Large-Scale 3D Print Farms utilize 1000's of FDM 3D printers working 24/7 to offer limitless scalability and unparalleled flexibility. Whether it's 100 or 100,000 parts, our system can handle it reliably, while still allowing for real-time design updates, ensuring products evolve with the times. This adaptability is key in today's fast-paced world.
🌿 Sustainable Manufacturing: Eco-Friendly Efficiency
Embrace a system that drastically reduces carbon emissions by eliminating carbon-intensive steps in the supply chain, such as global shipping and warehousing. Our approach minimizes this footprint, offering a more sustainable manufacturing option.
⚙️ Digital Warehouses: Parts On-Demand
Think of print farms as a "Digital Warehouse", meaning we can store your parts digitally on a server rather than physically on a shelf. parts are available on-demand, reducing the need for extensive physical inventory.
As an Amazon Associate, I earn commission from qualifying purchases.
Produced by Slant Media
Full Video:
ua-cam.com/video/ujAwxSx63FE/v-deo.htmlsi=HF2mAYt7LmsiZhWc
Do you also print multi material? Would you say it is more expensive to print a small part completely in PA-CF compared to the main body in PA and only ~1/7 in PA-CF?
It's also preferable in 2 materials as I don't need the strength and abrasiveness in the lower part.
At the moment I am handfeeding the filament at a certain point. Got an IDEX printer but the cooling time between nozzle change is not great, I'd rather print the nylon in a continuous way.
It's a valve adapter. Just wondering how you would solve that in production.
ua-cam.com/video/XK95hkC95I0/v-deo.html
I feel like you missed way #2: sanding
Sand it
😊p6
Special technique: Sandpaper
Honestly though, because that would remove any ugly layering. Even printing on the side still has the rigid wall, so sanding it down just seems the most logical.
That's what I'm saying😆
Bondo and sandpaper on top bro☝️
While we both seem to be equally ingenious, i must concede that you are faster. Well done sir.
I've done this on fingerboards (Yes Tech Decks) and it works!
You can also sand it down to get that curve if you have thick enough layers to support doing that.
Our videos deal with specifically mass production 3d printing. Sanding is fine for one-off parts, but sanding 10,000 parts is a lot of sanding.
@@slant3dDepending on how the part is made. If you can strap them together and get a decend finish with an orbital sander, it's rather quick.
@slant3d I'm pretty sure you could come up with an automated way to sand a lot of parts if you mass-produced 3d printed parts. The reason that no one does this is because 3d printing isn't designed for mass production but for prototyping. If you mass produce something you have the money to invest in injection molds.
@@slant3dThere's still layer lines though. At that point, wouldn't you want to just sand a fdm prototype then do injection molding?
That’s a lot of microplastics
Orca Slicer (and by extension Bambu Studio) has a dynamic layer height option for this! No need to do teeny layers the whole way.
Cura has had dynamic layers for years too. Just in case that's your preferred slicer you don't have to switch.
@@extragoodetho you still should check Orca out and maybe switch anyways😅
Ya but I always just hold it down and sand down my mouse, cuz I want that shit smooth ...is that the same tool? The little lines?
Isn't orca slicer and banbu slicer all based on prusa slicer?
@@AckzaTV Orca is based on Bambu Studio which is based on prusaSlicer and slic3r. The people working on Orca seem to be quite fast at implementing new features and picking the best from other slicers.
There is also non planar printing. The top of the curve can be printed as a curved surface giving the same quality as printing it in its side.
Just waiting for the slicing software to make this easy!
@@AustinDungan not just software, also hardware. Ideally, the nozzle can rotate around to do perfect non-planar moves.
Sounds extremely expensive for not a lot of benefit
@@tongpoo8985 you dont need to pay anything if you have a 3d printer
@@Darenz-cg9zgnot just the the nozzle. Part should be able to move too.
Another option that avoids most of the ugliness, which is the inconsistency of having exposed diagonal fill, is to increase the number of outlines around solid fill so that the exposed part just looks like more perimeters.
Or use concentric top layers :)
@@riba2233 That's an option too but I find it's ugly on actually flat tops, accentuates accidental geometry.
@@daliasprints9798 ah ok, makes sense :)
Printing it on its side is a great solution for this issue, but also has the side effect of showing the seam for fully cylindrical parts. I’m looking forward to the new developments that further help to eliminate seam issues for cylindrical parts
Scarf seam solves that
Also random seam positioning and fuzzy skin give a more uniform appearance.
@@fbombtehgr3at I haven't tried the fuzzy skin option yet, looking forward to it and thanks for reminding me!
@@brandonfarmer4323 well, we are already there, seams are not really an issue since many years now (with correct settings). :)
Ty for actually pointing out that you don't have to force the device to do what it isn't good at
Reminds me of the "vector vs raster scan" arcade monitor wars of the 80's.
I'm not sure wym but you reminded me of the raster v. vector dilemma in web design
@@pythondrink You aren't far off, actually. Back in the day, virtually all monitors and TVs worked by shooting a beam of electrons line by line down the screen, producing a colorful image, but limited by big blocky images and low resolution. Someone had an idea to just use the electron beam to draw the graphics themselves on the monitor, giving you an image with smooth lines on every side, but was limited by draw time, with virtually every game limited to only drawing the outlines of graphics and characters.
The most famous games that used the technique are Astroids and Tempest. Sadly the trend didn't last long as resolutions for games scaled up quickly, but some games still emulate the style for nostalgia, Vid-ribbon coming to mind.
Sandpaper: Am I joke to you?
@@willynilly18films zzz
Or just sand it to smoothness.
Catefully, of course. Don't want to damage your beautiful creations.
Something to invent: GCODE controlled heat plate to smooth out those edges
non-planar 3d printing is something people are working on to accomplish that, though there are still problems with it, particularly with clearances of the nozzle and the speed of the z-axis
They already have that it's a plugin called "electric blanket" it's on github, but only works in an old version of cura. I made that all up
@@linkeroniwThat's why you want a hexa (6 axis variant delta with each arm independent).
probably easier and more precise just use a regular mill attachment to smooth out the surface. With heat plate you got lot less precise heat projection, and might lead to key dimension sway. But g code wise, it's the same
@@keenheat3335That only allows for exterior surfaces to be corrected, the main benefits of additive manufacturing are that you can control the parameters of every surface of the part.
you could also use variable layer height
At my old school, in a computer lab, there was a 3D printer and I was intrigued. They were trying to 3D print a perched Eagle with its wings spread out, but they’ve been only making spaghetti results for some reason, I figured that something was wrong but through years of occasional seeing 3D print videos, I realized that they could’ve built it in separate pieces if it was that tedious.
My go to solution: sand paper.
Integral Calculus IRL
I thought this was tuna in the thumbnail
I cannot tell you how useful this could be in a classroom to teach Calculus.
Watching this without even having a 3D printer
The easiest way around this from my experience is to rotate it so that the circular side is on the baseplate. Printing it square side down usually causes this problem. Unless you are using a resin printer i guess.
Besterer solution is to make it 1/8th thicker and have a master craftsman shave the 1/8th down so it's perfectly smooth. Trust me, someone out there is really that skilled
Or you can use VLH or Variable Layer Height, which automatically decreases layer height where details are needed (in this case, at the top)
I love the pixel art explanation of it
Your printer is tuned well. I need to learn how to print that good of quality
Great videos man. Appreciate it
Helped me a lot
Keep it up
Flatland: a circle has angled edges that are too small to perceive
This actually seems really helpful as someone who wants to make figures of my favorite video game characters when I get a 3D printer (Seriously I can't believe that Reject won't give us Dialovers figures, they're really going to force me to make a figure of Kino instead of letting me give them my money)
Definitely subscribing! Im taking engineering electives in highschool and we use Fusion 360 and this channel seems good!!
Welcome. Thank you
I don't even own a 3D Printer and I'm invested in these videos
Perfect excuse to buy one
I think that math is called "Inverse square law"... The curvature by radius by rise or drop by distance by distance.. it is complicated math, at first, but once it clicks in the mind, is is actually then really simple to dictate and predict in designing a part or drawing .
No. Just no.
Inverse square law is for electromagnetic waves
Adaptive layer height will take care of this.
as a not owner of 3d printer, i found this useful
Something that I heard helping with masking layer lines is to reheat the plastic after printing with a heat gun to partially melt the plastic and then smooth the lines over. Doing this can also increase the durability of the structure as well making it less likely to separate.
Sqrubbing it on sandpaper does the work as long as you perfectly sqrub it without doing it too much.
Or maybe using a special mechanism that usues sandpaper to make your printed objects smoother.
I recognized 'print it on its side' right away.
Came here to say this!!! 😂
I love layer lines the feel nice to touch when my mom prints things nice texture
That's a pretty ingenious solution. My thoughts were to sand it smooth, but that's pretty awesome.
Today I learned about physical pixels
For larger scale commercial smoothing of layer lines, you can use vacuum chambers or otherwise sealed chambers where a chemical solvent is introduced as an aerosol or gas to gently dissolve (smooth) the outer layer(s). Can be done in small home applications or larger commercial runs but there are always multiple solutions to a problem, just depends on how you or your business is already structured or equipped.
But that doesn't work on every type of filament, the only ones I have heard of that do it well are abs and polysmooth pla
@@linkeroniwPolysmooth is NOT PLA, it's PVB. You can also get it (much cheaper) from various Chinese filament companies like YOUSU.
@@daliasprints9798 my bad, but it has been a while since I heard anything on it and the name is pretty close to pla
Adaptive layer heights is certainly worth mentioning here
If u print with Bambulab P1S, u can reduce the layer hight to a minimum of 0,08mm if u want smth in a really good shape.
I can't believe he made this video about this issue and didn't even mention adaptive layers.
There is also the option of dynamic layer thickness, so you get the best of both worlds
Me trying to print a sphere: 👍
That "adaptive layer" feature on Cura Can also help with this type of print when you have no choice
You can put weathered copper above and under copper and itll go faster, you can fill a whole chunk and even automate it. Xisuma showed a farm in his latest upload :)
Thanks I really needed someone to explain this to me.
You can use adaptive layering with ironing to get the best result
Dude, my dad is a 3D print guy, and he is insane about it.
Also finishing the surface helps! plan it slightly bigger than you need it then take away for a smooth finish if you have 100% infill on the outside surfaces
You could also just sand the curved surface with sandpaper too
You can also melt it down alittle and smooth it out with some sandpaper
OMG GENIUS THANK YOU ❤
When I was a kid playing Nintendo and super Nintendo, I always wondered how it would look if the pixels were arranged diagonally, rather than straight horizontal and vertical.
A great way to visualize calculus
Best solution is to light it afterwards to melt the outer layer smooth
You could cover your prints in Resin to make it very smooth.
The teleportation intro is new to me.
That's due to interpolation in cartesian system, you could try cylindrical coordinate system to get a more aesthetic finish.
Thankfully sandpaper can also help when you really NEED it to be smooth. Overall this problem is getting better with wvery generation of 3D printers
I havent heard this song in YEARS omg this took me back
Adaptive layer height helps too
you could use a heat gun to slightly melt the layer lines too
Stairway to waterbear heaven.
Remember. Circle is made out of infinite amount of points stacked together. Its pretty much perfectly visible here. Those spaces can be bigger or smaller
Actually did an analysis of this 3DP artifact effects on early drag crisis onset for bluff cylinders in college. Depending on operating speeds, layer height and angle at which the cylinder is printed could be optimized to decrease overall air resistance.
the Fusin clip at the end gave me nightmares lmao
*cackles in resin printing*
You mean gay printing?
@@Martin-xh1hd It is, in fact, very happy and delightful printing, yes.
It’s the same with most CNC parts. The coding isn’t for creating a radius, it’s for creating microns of edges that form a curve.
There is a way of putty-modelling that works very similar like 3D printing, but by hand and manual labor. Much more work, but no problems with layer lines.
I just used sandpaper. I forgot the grain, but I make a VR gunstock to aim, and the grips where rough and rigid so I just sandpapered them and now I can hold them alright
I've seen people even out layers with sandpaper too.
I saw some people use heat to melt the plastic a bit so it smooths out, dunno if that's something that works better or looks better than sanding but food for thought ig
Can't believe Pat Cummins is 3D printing 😂😂
Why does it look satisfyingly scratchable 😩
3D Printing is a hobby, for the average user this wouldn't matter much, most will be happy that their prints actually come out.
If you want a quality finish you're going to have to work for it, this has always been the way with 3D Printing at least with FDM printers.
For me anytime I have parts that are crucial to have curves like that, I use my resin printer. The resolution on my two resin printers is just insane when it comes to curves. I can print little figurines and stuff and to the naked eye it would appear as if it was an injection molded plastic part. Printing at such a fine detail is amazing. But resin takes a hell of a lot longer to print and is a lot more maintenance and keep up. And plus you have to watch your sizes of parts that you print with resin. My big resin printer has an auto fill reservoir, so as the resin gets used it refills itself. But more rescue you use the more expensive it gets! And resin can be a hell of a lot stronger than FDM printing, but we can also be more brittle. So those kind of a sweet spot of what works best on a resident printer versus what works best on a FDM printer and what you're making
What about rotating the printing plate, so it never creates a shallow print surface? Is there an continuous hot plate attachment for dynamic printing surface?
The very first solution is polish. I was gonna say sanding but idk how 3D printing would take to that. The point is you can smooth it out somehow after printing, and that should be the finishing step
Master Lego builders are every familiar with this when building spheres
Love your thinking men 👍👍👍
sanding.. just a little. works great
You can also sand it smooth.
I imagine the second option seems like it would increase the print time by a lot. I see most people sand the pieces down after printing. I just wish there were more biodegradable filament options so whatever comes off your piece wasn't micro plastics 🥴
Sandpaper. It exists, and makes most 3D prints much better
Printing on the side creates better bonding between layer.Surface can sand off.
Good old derivation. It’s looks exactly like the models used to teach the concept of a derivative in calc I classes
People before sandpaper was invented:
This music is makin my sleeper agent wake up
Question:
Why not sand it to a smooth finish after?
I’d imagine it’s very possible
Some slicers have an option for non planar 3d printing, which can be used in this scenario
Bondo glazing spot putty mixed with 100% acetone to a 1:1 ratio. stir. apply with a foam brush. do multiple layers. sand.
And if you went down to .1pm it would be even smoother. One thing a lot of people forget from math is that every line has an ‘infinite’ number of points. The more points we measure the smoother the line becomes. The current problem with 3D printing isn’t us humans but the limits of the machine.
The thumbnail looks like a premium slice of raw salmon
Josh just lying on the ground at the end
Print it at 45 degree angle with the with the sharp edge above
Actually CNC machining has this issue with 3D contours too, just not quite to the same extent as with additive manufacturing. I've seen parts at work which had to be machined for 10 hours and yet still showed a visible step on the 3° inclined surfaces which had to get sanded smooth before delivery
you forgot dynamic layer height settings in slicers which automatically increase the resolution for curved surfaces.
My immediate thought: sand that sucker with sand paper or a sanding belt.
I know this is probably not what you're supposed to do but with parts like that i just sand them slightly on a fine grit belt sander