Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.
@@mirekslechta7161 dont forget Russia has a real soldiers in their country, soldiers who love their country and for them die for motherland is a honor. We in NATO, and mostly in west Europe where US spread rainbow flags, have children who will start to cry when they enter battlefield like is the one in Ukraine
As it relates to NATO, technically (hee hee) NATO is a defensive alliance, and Russia has not attacked a NATO member. NATO members would not vote for such a thing. And if NATO wants to go to war with Russia for its right to expand into Ukraine, then Russia was always right to claim that NATO is an aggressive alliance, an instrument of US military dominance in Eurasia, (Serbia, Afghanistan, and a number of other countries NATO has attacked), and is right to keep it out of Ukraine and Georgia, which are critical to Russian security.
Before my buddy Pete went to the Gulf he was nothing but fun. When he got back he wouldn't laugh at the funniest joke on earth. Pete survived but lost a piece of himself. I could no longer hang out with him.
Got to laugh. NATO and US have armed Ukraine to the teeth and are still getting their asses handed to them on a plate. West has now expended most of it's weapons in Ukraine and now has no hope of winning any war. US now trying to start WW3 as they get ever more desperate🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Easy to talk. If Russia is weaken by supplying Ukraine with arms, missiles and billions of USD since 3 years with European citizens money, why you are afraid of soo much? Yes you are opening Pandoras box as comedian emphasised. Let me remind you proverb: If you asked to dance with a bear, the bear decides when the dance ends. Good luck wise guys.
Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.
No one wants to defeat Russia. Why does Russia want to start a proxy war in Ukraine, as Putin calls it? He knows the US and UK guarantee Ukraine's borders and so does he, so why invade? If Ukraine had it's own defense this war would have never happened, therefore an unarmed Ukraine moving into the future is untenable from a negotiation point. If you listen to the man, it's not that NATO wanted war with Russia. The problem is and will remain, NATO does everything possible to keep the peace but Russia really isn't satisfied by remaining within it's own borders.
Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.
The way I see it, as to the Russian change in its nuclear doctrine. 1). It appears to me that Russia's doctrine formalizes the idea that in the instance of a foreign power providing the means for substantial military attacks into Russia, AND authorizing those attacks against Russian territory, will be taken as a legal declaration of war by that foreign power against Russia. The size of the attack remains obscure, but we have to assume that a large attack, or a series of multiple attacks, would suffice. 2). The doctrine then adds that Russia accepts that as a legal declaration of war, and preserves the right of any type of response, up to and including nuclear war. 3). That means that, for example, United States authorization of the use of U.S. provided missiles by Ukraine against targets in Russia is to be taken, in legal terms, as a United States declaration of war against Russia, which Russia automatically accepts as such, automatically declaring war in response. Of course that becomes a mutual declaration of Cold War, when it pauses short of an actual Russian military attack against the territorial United States and/or its U.S. protected assets abroad. Thus, if there was any doubt that the world has returned to a condition of Cold War between East and west, that doubt is entirely eradicated by the new doctrine. 4). The doctrine further defines that the declaration of war by means of providence and authorization given to a third party by a foreign power, is a declaration of war extending to whatever military organization the provident and authorizing power is a member of. Clearly that means NATO, but might extend further, such as to AUKUS. 5). Presumably Russia's allies, with whom it has defense treaties, such as China, are in agreement with the new doctrine and would maintain their military agreements with Russia within the context of what the new doctrine defines. Presumably the Kremlin regime discussed aspects of the new doctrine with the Beijing regime, prior to implementing, and perhaps with some others. At least in principle if not in detail. Our intel is very weak if if lacks a definite and clear answer to that aspect of the change. 6). We must assume that the new doctrine opens up the legal possibility, within the context of Russian law and Russian treaties that Russia intends to maintain, for Russia to deploy and utilize any weapons that it has available, up to and including nuclear, within the Kursk and Ukraine theatres. Even if Russia chooses, as it seems likely to do, to avoid a direct war with the foreign provident and authorizing power and its alliances. In the current scenario the USA, and NATO and AUKUS. There is reason to believe that Russia will escalate its military campaign against Ukraine forces, and we cannot now exclude Russian use of any conventional weapons at its disposal, inclusive of weapons it has refrained thus far from using, as well as the possibility of escalation to the use of tactical nuclear weapons within those theaters. 7). What other actions Russia might choose to engage in remains an open question, even stopping short of direct military confrontation leading to nuclear war with the west. Certainly the security needs as regards NATO and American military assets, and military industrial assets (particularly those involved in providence of weapons to Ukraine) need to be reviewed and reset to the levels that prevailed during the most difficult years of the Cold War. The doctrinal legal declaration of war, resulting from the U.S. providence and approval, demands at least that. The West is fully forced into a war footing, with Cold War levels of very real uncertainty as to what the escalated levels of conflict might lead to. In effect we, in the west, are legally at war with Russia, subsequent to the Biden authorization for Ukraine strikes, using American provided weapons, into Russian territory. We have to keep in mind that regardless of what we might think concerning the details and events the dangers and consequences must be recognized as fact. To say Russia is wrong, or America is wrong, or whatever, does not change the facts as to the actual scenario, and the relation of that to the revised doctrine. The facts remain the facts and it then becomes the role of military planners and enhanced / intensified intel gathering to deal with the new scenario properly and fully as the given. As the given not as an ethnical or moral or even political debate about alternate realities.
Putin is too much of a childly coward to ever use a nuke. His values his own miserable life far too much to ever be a true martyr and is himself a completely fake Christian.
Trump is Putin's greatest ally and his puppet. They have secretly been talking for the last four years and have already conspired to pause the war on Russia's terms and save Putin from disaster. Putin praised Trump's plan to end the war because it's his plan.
Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.
Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.
Showing Putin you are afraid is a strategic failure.
Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.
@ Western weapons are being used against the Russian invaders and have been thoroughly tested in Ukraine.
@@mirekslechta7161 dont forget Russia has a real soldiers in their country, soldiers who love their country and for them die for motherland is a honor. We in NATO, and mostly in west Europe where US spread rainbow flags, have children who will start to cry when they enter battlefield like is the one in Ukraine
Listening to this man is a torture.
Dont listen! Thats it.
Because he's lier
I like this guy.
Send in the NATO armies and tell Russia to "GET THE HECK OUT"
NO COMPROMISE - NO PEACE - GET OUT
THAT A HECKUVA COMMENT KIDDO AND STRONGLY WORDED To
😂😂😂😂
As it relates to NATO, technically (hee hee) NATO is a defensive alliance, and Russia has not attacked a NATO member. NATO members would not vote for such a thing. And if NATO wants to go to war with Russia for its right to expand into Ukraine, then Russia was always right to claim that NATO is an aggressive alliance, an instrument of US military dominance in Eurasia, (Serbia, Afghanistan, and a number of other countries NATO has attacked), and is right to keep it out of Ukraine and Georgia, which are critical to Russian security.
What nato armies?in high hill the Rainbow soldiers😅😅😅
One condition - you go there and tell them yourself.
simply time to shift gear in support of Ukraine
Before my buddy Pete went to the Gulf he was nothing but fun. When he got back he wouldn't laugh at the funniest joke on earth. Pete survived but lost a piece of himself. I could no longer hang out with him.
One could see anger and frustration on his face
This man dangerously misrepresents the Russian position.
Sure, Pyotr.
Got to laugh. NATO and US have armed Ukraine to the teeth and are still getting their asses handed to them on a plate. West has now expended most of it's weapons in Ukraine and now has no hope of winning any war. US now trying to start WW3 as they get ever more desperate🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Easy to talk. If Russia is weaken by supplying Ukraine with arms, missiles and billions of USD since 3 years with European citizens money, why you are afraid of soo much? Yes you are opening Pandoras box as comedian emphasised. Let me remind you proverb: If you asked to dance with a bear, the bear decides when the dance ends. Good luck wise guys.
Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.
No one wants to defeat Russia. Why does Russia want to start a proxy war in Ukraine, as Putin calls it? He knows the US and UK guarantee Ukraine's borders and so does he, so why invade? If Ukraine had it's own defense this war would have never happened, therefore an unarmed Ukraine moving into the future is untenable from a negotiation point. If you listen to the man, it's not that NATO wanted war with Russia. The problem is and will remain, NATO does everything possible to keep the peace but Russia really isn't satisfied by remaining within it's own borders.
That guy looks like an evil Mr Bean.
He used to be a tiny guy hanging around a skeleton, he was on the cover of "Du och jag doden"
you can tell how terrified russians are by the desperate trolls commenting from their fake accounts
America agrees Joe's brain is absent, yet the world allows him to play war.
That statement is just stupid. You are either a Trumpist or on Putin's side.
@Wil482Senior which part of my comment do you disagree with?
@@justbe1451
All of it, Ivan.
@Awibrahor okay Joe
At what cost though?
Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.
@@mirekslechta7161well said.
I read a book on Russia and seen some UA-cam videos can I get a job at a think tank and get some TV interviews...I'm good at telling bs as well
another EXPERT
The way I see it, as to the Russian change in its nuclear doctrine. 1). It appears to me that Russia's doctrine formalizes the idea that in the instance of a foreign power providing the means for substantial military attacks into Russia, AND authorizing those attacks against Russian territory, will be taken as a legal declaration of war by that foreign power against Russia. The size of the attack remains obscure, but we have to assume that a large attack, or a series of multiple attacks, would suffice. 2). The doctrine then adds that Russia accepts that as a legal declaration of war, and preserves the right of any type of response, up to and including nuclear war. 3). That means that, for example, United States authorization of the use of U.S. provided missiles by Ukraine against targets in Russia is to be taken, in legal terms, as a United States declaration of war against Russia, which Russia automatically accepts as such, automatically declaring war in response. Of course that becomes a mutual declaration of Cold War, when it pauses short of an actual Russian military attack against the territorial United States and/or its U.S. protected assets abroad. Thus, if there was any doubt that the world has returned to a condition of Cold War between East and west, that doubt is entirely eradicated by the new doctrine. 4). The doctrine further defines that the declaration of war by means of providence and authorization given to a third party by a foreign power, is a declaration of war extending to whatever military organization the provident and authorizing power is a member of. Clearly that means NATO, but might extend further, such as to AUKUS. 5). Presumably Russia's allies, with whom it has defense treaties, such as China, are in agreement with the new doctrine and would maintain their military agreements with Russia within the context of what the new doctrine defines. Presumably the Kremlin regime discussed aspects of the new doctrine with the Beijing regime, prior to implementing, and perhaps with some others. At least in principle if not in detail. Our intel is very weak if if lacks a definite and clear answer to that aspect of the change. 6). We must assume that the new doctrine opens up the legal possibility, within the context of Russian law and Russian treaties that Russia intends to maintain, for Russia to deploy and utilize any weapons that it has available, up to and including nuclear, within the Kursk and Ukraine theatres. Even if Russia chooses, as it seems likely to do, to avoid a direct war with the foreign provident and authorizing power and its alliances. In the current scenario the USA, and NATO and AUKUS. There is reason to believe that Russia will escalate its military campaign against Ukraine forces, and we cannot now exclude Russian use of any conventional weapons at its disposal, inclusive of weapons it has refrained thus far from using, as well as the possibility of escalation to the use of tactical nuclear weapons within those theaters. 7). What other actions Russia might choose to engage in remains an open question, even stopping short of direct military confrontation leading to nuclear war with the west. Certainly the security needs as regards NATO and American military assets, and military industrial assets (particularly those involved in providence of weapons to Ukraine) need to be reviewed and reset to the levels that prevailed during the most difficult years of the Cold War. The doctrinal legal declaration of war, resulting from the U.S. providence and approval, demands at least that. The West is fully forced into a war footing, with Cold War levels of very real uncertainty as to what the escalated levels of conflict might lead to. In effect we, in the west, are legally at war with Russia, subsequent to the Biden authorization for Ukraine strikes, using American provided weapons, into Russian territory. We have to keep in mind that regardless of what we might think concerning the details and events the dangers and consequences must be recognized as fact. To say Russia is wrong, or America is wrong, or whatever, does not change the facts as to the actual scenario, and the relation of that to the revised doctrine. The facts remain the facts and it then becomes the role of military planners and enhanced / intensified intel gathering to deal with the new scenario properly and fully as the given. As the given not as an ethnical or moral or even political debate about alternate realities.
Forza uakrina and anto
bruh can yall jus stop the killing instead?
Yeah 😂😂😂 Hitler and Napoleon and also Ottoman try before 😂😂😂😂
Ukraine has lost 900 000 men. Ukraine has lost. Make a deal now before more land is lost.
Nuclear power can be beaten on the battlefield😂, how old are you boy😂
Putin is too much of a childly coward to ever use a nuke. His values his own miserable life far too much to ever be a true martyr and is himself a completely fake Christian.
1000 days and NATO can't win with weak Russia. Embarrassing.
This guy is delusional, his in a different reality 🤣
Stop dreaming please
Ur delusional if you think k Russia can be beaten lol
delusional
big nose, big liar
He is a liar and emotional for nothing
This was waist of time, this dude contradicted to himself from the start. Morons
This gentleman who is trying to misinform your audience is empty and fake
Trump is a grumpy old man, he will kick asses, that's what Trump does like the most! '' Putin, you're fired! '' lol
Trump is Putin's greatest ally and his puppet. They have secretly been talking for the last four years and have already conspired to pause the war on Russia's terms and save Putin from disaster. Putin praised Trump's plan to end the war because it's his plan.
Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.
Not with weak Europe doing nothing
Russia has modern army and USA ´s weapons never had been tested against modern army like in Ukraine. Russia also has rockets which are mostly better than anything from west. And I do not mean just new hypersonic missilles. Russia has effective jamming systems which is working very well against weapons which used to be effective somewhere in Africa against "enemies" in sandals... Russia has also better tanks IMHO (despite of what we hear from main stream media). The mere fact that the Russians have managed to bring several hypersonic missiles into use (!) within a few years and the Americans, in contrast, have not been able to do so for 10 years, shows the enormous difference. Every single western weapon that has been sent to Ukraine has been a failure.Russia also has more developed strategic nuclear missilles than USA, so I have no doubt, that if nuclear war would start, than all USA ´s and U.K. s big cities would be reduced to a layer of hot radioactive glass within 2 hours and the rest would remain radioactive for next 200 years.. So what does this war mean? Why do they want to defeat Russia? Why? What is wrong with Russia? Did you forget, that Ukraine kept killing Russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 and USA wanted to get it´s military inside Ukraine in future?(It was said by Bush in 2008 in Bucharest NATO summit, that Ukraine was on path to NATO membership) I am sure that we(I mean people in Europe) should rather get along with Russia, no reason for us to get along with corrupt Ukraine which is promoting it´s Nazi past (Bandera is national hero of Ukraine...), or with USA which hit Germany-pipelines. We need Russia´s cheap energies and minerals, certainly not USA´s expensive gas and their obsolete weaponry. USA is not a friend like Russia used to be prior this war, USA is only using everyone for it´s own interests.