Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Chaos Game | Fractals emerging from chaos | Computer simulation |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лис 2017
  • I wanted to make a video about this topic for a long time, however without knowing how to code it would be really inefficient to animate every single dot by hand. So for the past few weeks I've been learning how to program animations and so I managed to simulate a chaos game.
    Thanks for watching :)
    _________________________________________________________________
    Thank you everyone for 1000 subs. It's really cool that over a thousand people are actually interested in my content. I'm thankful for all the comments and support that I've been getting from you. I decided to create a Patreon page. If you feel like you would like to see more of my content as well as get to know more about me consider becoming a patron at :
    / think_twice
    _________________________________________________________________
    Any further questions or ideas:
    Email - thinktwiceask@gmail.com
    Twitter - / thinktwice2580
    _________________________________________________________________
    Overall render time: ~ 4 hours
    Programs used:
    - Processing (Game simulation)
    - Cinema 4D (shape outline)
    - Adobe Premiere Pro (Editing)
    _________________________________________________________________
    Music by: Tom Day
    Hiatus - • Video
    ________________________________________________________________

КОМЕНТАРІ • 475

  • @cinfdef
    @cinfdef 3 роки тому +1566

    Me putting a point directly in the center: *Reality can be whatever I want*

    • @struanpeat5116
      @struanpeat5116 3 роки тому +120

      Okay, but seriously
      What happens if you put a point in the middle?

    • @struanpeat5116
      @struanpeat5116 3 роки тому +25

      @Sai Sasank thanks, just watched it, I actually understand the phenomenon alot better now

    • @BakedAlaskaTM
      @BakedAlaskaTM 3 роки тому +42

      since it's technically forming a one dimensional shape, it's pretty much impossible to not put the dot in one of the blank areas, since the points have zero length and width.

    • @NStripleseven
      @NStripleseven 3 роки тому +3

      @Sai Sasank link?

    • @user-ov1fe3xu7f
      @user-ov1fe3xu7f 3 роки тому +17

      @@BakedAlaskaTM They're not one dimensional, just more like 1.3 dimensional or like that. You can understand that with areas, if you will try a square and a line, i can give you link to one video about that.

  • @kaninchengaming-inactive-6529
    @kaninchengaming-inactive-6529 6 років тому +595

    The Legend of Fractal - Breath of the Chaos

  • @dubarnik
    @dubarnik 6 років тому +568

    Long time ago, I was an 8th grade math teacher. At the end of the year, after all the state testing was done and we were counting down days until summer break, I did a unit on fractals. I spent a couple of lessons teaching my students how to program their TI-83s to graph the Serpinski Triangle. The program is about 12 lines long and uses the algorithm at the start of this video. The program is still available and works on all of the TI-84s.

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +89

      Oh, that's nice. If you'd like to check out my code it is at the bottom of the description however keep in mind that im new to coding so feel free to share any tips.

    • @Tondadrd
      @Tondadrd 6 років тому +34

      Hey! I didn't find your code mentioned in the description...
      Maybe you standardized video descriptions and overwrote it?

    • @silentobserver4839
      @silentobserver4839 5 років тому +4

      *Sierpinski

    • @silentobserver4839
      @silentobserver4839 4 роки тому +5

      @kurz1000 I bet that in English it is „Sierpinski Triangle", while in Polish "trójkąt Sierpińskiego".

    • @FeedMeChaos1
      @FeedMeChaos1 3 роки тому +1

      Yes but why?

  • @ethangilchrist3534
    @ethangilchrist3534 5 років тому +560

    "Is this a fractal?"
    "No, this is Patrick"

    • @chaosxdani
      @chaosxdani 3 роки тому +5

      Lol

    • @spacekid9680
      @spacekid9680 3 роки тому +1

      Patrick

    • @simonmultiverse6349
      @simonmultiverse6349 2 роки тому +1

      Is "Patrick" a trick performed by your father? That would mean that "Matrick" is a trick performed by your mother. Then we have Brotrick and Sistrick (obviously) and, if you have a four-legged pet, we have dotrick.

    • @hyperclipse
      @hyperclipse Рік тому

      @@simonmultiverse6349 dotrick = two tricks in 1
      tritrick =

    • @simonmultiverse6349
      @simonmultiverse6349 Рік тому

      Woof.
      Furthermore, *WOOOOOF* also bark, bark!

  • @Blananas2
    @Blananas2 5 років тому +87

    "Oh, just random points, it can't be that intresti-- Wait what?"

  • @FelineFlame-dj1xl
    @FelineFlame-dj1xl 3 роки тому +20

    I love how it pulls a 64 bits 32 bits 16 bits 8 bits 4 bits 2 BITS 1 BIT HALF BIT *QUARTER BIT* at 1:07

  • @Tondadrd
    @Tondadrd 6 років тому +404

    Cool,
    A bit of research, putting the first point into proper position and it will become a rotation similar fractal. Right?
    Btw. I came from *3b1b featured creators #1* and I'm happy I have. Your videos are showing pure beauty of math!

    • @brentonwang6771
      @brentonwang6771 6 років тому

      MIMIK 100th like

    • @Mynameisevanbro
      @Mynameisevanbro 4 роки тому

      Same

    • @masonhunter2748
      @masonhunter2748 3 роки тому

      It’s an error in the code

    • @ragnarock1008
      @ragnarock1008 3 роки тому +2

      I have a Guide Voodo, and imma throw it to the lava

    • @haxel96
      @haxel96 3 роки тому

      ​@@ragnarock1008 Andrew the Guide was slain.
      Wall of Flesh has awoken!

  • @yamansanghavi
    @yamansanghavi 5 років тому +36

    Can we now say that math is art?

    • @loreleihillard5078
      @loreleihillard5078 3 роки тому +7

      Who ever said the two weren't linked?

    • @BungerBurg
      @BungerBurg Рік тому +9

      It's always been art

    • @xoiyoub
      @xoiyoub 2 місяці тому

      Depends on your definition of art. Math is related to art? Yes. It IS art? I don't know. As I said, it depends on your definition of art.

  • @marco_gallone
    @marco_gallone 3 роки тому +22

    I think “chaos” is interpreted incorrectly here, chaos essentially means *extremely sensitive to initial conditions*: change the initial randomly selected point marginally different from the first attempt and see a completely different pattern emerge. In this case it is more like “randomness”, and is opposite to chaos in that despite any random input conditions will always form a result with order.

  • @paithanq
    @paithanq 6 років тому +294

    Why doesn't the last one have rotational symmetry?

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +96

      I was surprised by that as well. I tried to check if I gave made any mistakes in my code but everything seemed fine. Let me know if you find the answer:)

    • @aaaa-hj9vv
      @aaaa-hj9vv 6 років тому +79

      Either there's a problem with your code, or your RNG isn't working properly. I did this same thing in Java and the generated shape had rotational symmetry.

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +98

      yes I guess there was a problem with the code. My bad:(

    • @aaaa-hj9vv
      @aaaa-hj9vv 6 років тому +49

      It was a great video nonetheless, and your new videos are also great! Please continue making more!

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +45

      thanks for nice words:) I will try to upload whenever I can. Hope this community will keep growing.

  • @TheRealThanos55
    @TheRealThanos55 Рік тому +2

    We love you Think twice! Thank you for creating this iteration animation!

  • @paramrathour441
    @paramrathour441 6 років тому +75

    You missed out on the fern one
    Its really beautiful, a perfect fern just from chaos

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +34

      Param Rathour ya i was gonna make a separate video about it

    • @paramrathour441
      @paramrathour441 6 років тому +8

      Think Twice I would be waiting for that.
      I like your way of explaining visually.

  • @tszheileung4410
    @tszheileung4410 3 роки тому +15

    When you are just having fun with shapes but end up summoning a demon

  • @sparshsingh3991
    @sparshsingh3991 6 років тому +1

    After all that I have learnt about fractals and their formation; (fixed initial condition and a fixed algorithm put on loop) the video title intrigued me beyond words. This concept further pushes us from our understanding of fractals.

  • @jrtao3709
    @jrtao3709 6 років тому +107

    why pentagon does not generate a symmetrical figure ? initial condition ?

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +70

      jr tao i messed up the code, sorry

    • @jrtao3709
      @jrtao3709 6 років тому +2

      its strange ! github.com/appleminis/PolygonDreamcatcher

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +21

      the rule was that the same vertex can't be chosen two times. Or the neighboring vertices can't be chosen. I can't remember from the top of my head right now.

    • @jrtao3709
      @jrtao3709 6 років тому

      random walk what iam looking hehe

    • @jrtao3709
      @jrtao3709 6 років тому +1

      mine don't break symmetry, i will try to understand something, thank you twice ;)

  • @weakamna
    @weakamna 6 років тому +3

    What you are describing here is an Iterative Function System, more specifically the "fractal flame algorithm", if you google that there is a paper as the second result. The first triangle algorithm you describe is the first one described in the paper. The paper goes on to describe techniques on how to improve the fidelity of the images generated (which can become very vivid and intricate!).
    These are used by programs such as Apophysis(7x) or Fractorium (which is a gpu based implementation, which runs many many times faster on basically any computer with a graphics card). For people interested in this, I highly recommend reading the paper and then trying the programs out, maybe looking at more informal tutorials as well.

  • @ineedtostudy6853
    @ineedtostudy6853 2 роки тому

    I just woke up and I am not ready for this. I will come back when I am actually awake

  • @coreymallard6650
    @coreymallard6650 2 роки тому

    mathematicians: *put together an elegant closed system that works beautifully in creating an image that infinitely repeats itself over and over, evolving the world of mathematics and our understanding of it*
    me at 2:20 : hehe patrick

  • @accursedcursive4935
    @accursedcursive4935 3 роки тому +1

    For those wondering why a fractal is produced, think of it like this:
    For the large middle black triangle, there is no random vertex and random point in the triangle you could pick such that the midpoint lies in that triangle. So, the random movement of the point will never land there.
    For the three smaller triangles, the only way for the midpoint to land there is for the starting point to be in the middle black triangle; however, as said before, the point never lands there, so the point never lands in these three triangles either.
    And then for the nine yet smaller triangles, their starting point would have to be in one of those three smaller triangles, and so on.

    • @justapassie
      @justapassie Рік тому

      ohh omg huge thanks for the explanation !
      so for the midpoint to land in the middle black triangle initially, a random point must be outside the triangle (and that's not the case here)
      and this would lead to the approach that our 3-sided triangle shown is adjacent to 3 larger black triangles outside on the screen

  • @lucyluo497
    @lucyluo497 6 років тому +4

    Looooove your choice of music. Will be looking forward to hear your own music as background, would be cool ❤️

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +2

      thanks Lucy :) I'll try to write my own song

    • @lucyluo497
      @lucyluo497 6 років тому +1

      hope you feel better soon x

  • @Forsajak
    @Forsajak Рік тому +1

    0:58 Zelda logo complicated
    1:45 snowflake
    2:20 summoning a demon

  • @linsproul3548
    @linsproul3548 6 років тому +21

    on the triangle, what if you put the first point in the center of the triangle? would that ruin the fractal?

    • @xtehmoonlight7400
      @xtehmoonlight7400 4 роки тому +1

      no

    • @leophysics
      @leophysics 2 роки тому +2

      No it's somehow manage to get its shape

    • @aidenwallin3523
      @aidenwallin3523 Рік тому +1

      It's interesting that if you ran infinite cuts, there would basically be straight lines from the corners to the center, except for an infinitely small point in the very corner of the triangle. The middle points on the edges of the blue triangle create the midpoint on the edges of the cut out triangles, as the midpoint of the edge midpoint and vertices create triangles.

    • @lscskoolnbownz5555
      @lscskoolnbownz5555 Рік тому

      @@aidenwallin3523 fddd ddo dddo did did didnt 😮😂do Z

  • @k_0_n_t_i_n_w_m
    @k_0_n_t_i_n_w_m 8 місяців тому

    Nice! Good clean idea, well presented.

  • @sayr2312
    @sayr2312 Рік тому

    This is one of the best vídeos that i ever seen

  • @sparshsingh3991
    @sparshsingh3991 6 років тому

    The title deserved a long ponder and a like STRAIGHTAWAY

  • @jlpsinde
    @jlpsinde 4 роки тому +1

    Amazing, this man deserves more people supporting on Patreon!

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  4 роки тому +1

      Thank you, really appreciate your support.

    • @jlpsinde
      @jlpsinde 4 роки тому

      @@ThinkTwiceLtu I raised from one dollar to two is not much but I can't afford a lot, is just you, Veritasium, 3Blue1Brown, Science Asylum and Eugene Khutoryansky.
      So you are one of my top five!
      I'm a physics teacher in Portugal.

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  4 роки тому

      @@jlpsinde No worries, I appreciate any kind of support whether it's monetary or not. I am happy that you enjoy my videos it keeps me even more motivated to create more high-quality content. Thanks a lot:)

  • @sjoerdstougie
    @sjoerdstougie 5 років тому

    If i were an artist, a musician I would buy the rights to the animation of the triangle and use it as a cover, its soooooo satisfying!!

  • @andistansbury4366
    @andistansbury4366 3 роки тому +2

    2:20 I don't know what that fractal is called so I'm going to call it the serpenski rocket

  • @xyz.ijk.
    @xyz.ijk. 6 років тому +5

    Your work is brilliant. It's so good that I even let the ads finish just to support you. And, yes, I'll hit up Patreon
    Good work.

  • @hpp6116
    @hpp6116 6 років тому

    No way! It's absolutely fascinating! Thanks for sharing.

  • @technowey
    @technowey Рік тому

    I have done this simulation and created Sierpinski triangle images. I've also created a Sierpinski triangle using another algorithm, and I know a third algorithm.
    These are cool.

  • @yueshijoorya601
    @yueshijoorya601 Рік тому

    "Total chaos" lmaoooo. The amount of misconception in the layman is just absurd.

  • @JJschannel255
    @JJschannel255 Рік тому +1

    2:26 is this a fractal?
    No,this is Patrick

  • @benjaminr1660
    @benjaminr1660 6 років тому +4

    Absolutely magnificent I've been working on this Serpinski triangle and I never imagined such a thing

  • @Mynameisevanbro
    @Mynameisevanbro 4 роки тому +1

    That is so fascinating

  • @shilohschwartz8671
    @shilohschwartz8671 6 років тому +3

    This place NEEDS more views, you are awesome!

  • @Aethos79
    @Aethos79 3 роки тому

    this is the best thing to watch when sleep deprived

  • @giuseppepapari8870
    @giuseppepapari8870 5 років тому +10

    Nice! Have you tried to use an initial point that lies inside one of the empty areas in your fractal? What will happen? Will that be the only point outside the fractal? Or maybe the fractal only appears for certain initial points?

  • @fazaazafg
    @fazaazafg 3 роки тому +1

    doing this on 3d, in a tetrahedron, will actually result in the 3d version of the sierpinski triangle which is the sierpinski tetrahedron

  • @sebastianzaczek
    @sebastianzaczek 5 років тому +7

    The Pentagon one looks like an Evil Version of Patrick star

  • @supreetsahu1964
    @supreetsahu1964 6 років тому +11

    I love this chaos game because I can't code, but these are so simple operations you could run it in MS Excel or any other spreadsheet app.

  • @sparshsingh3991
    @sparshsingh3991 6 років тому +3

    THIS CONCEPT ITSELF IS TOO AWESOME SO AS TO DESERVE A MILLION VIEWS.

  • @arealfluffycookie
    @arealfluffycookie 2 роки тому

    I am thoroughly terrified yet incredibly shocked at the same time

  • @jaybretherton6246
    @jaybretherton6246 6 років тому +6

    Why is the pentagon one not rotational symmetrical? Why is the bottom side the only one that fills?

  • @snaukball8764
    @snaukball8764 3 роки тому

    Everybody gangsta until he makes Mandelbrot's set with this

  • @Haapavuo
    @Haapavuo 5 років тому

    This is the scariest video of 2018! :o

  • @crazedtech7488
    @crazedtech7488 6 років тому +21

    Link's been hallucinating.

  • @musicismoreimportantthanyo9246
    @musicismoreimportantthanyo9246 2 роки тому

    I was obsessed with fractals a few years ago

  • @drbelli
    @drbelli 3 роки тому

    i believe this concept sparked a notion in my mind, that... this is one of the ways the Cosmos has to create reality, like a rule* that particles and atoms arrangement , a building block of the physical realm can never be in the same spot twice... a quick example, the snow crystals, but reality's matrix is 6 triangles facing each other or hexagonally based... 🤔

  • @IWantToStayAtYourHouse
    @IWantToStayAtYourHouse 5 років тому +10

    But for the triangle one, what if the intial point is in the middle?

    • @tapioms
      @tapioms 4 роки тому +1

      It doesn't matter, the point could be even outside of the triangle and the result will be the same

    • @loreleihillard5078
      @loreleihillard5078 3 роки тому +1

      Not EVERY point is on the Sierpinski Triangle, but the further you go, the more it approximates it.

  • @kale936
    @kale936 5 років тому

    The math with the triangles came out perfectly matching what our universe probably would have done. The list of dots per size range from 1XXL to 3XL to 9L to 27M to 81S. To see how 9 plays a major part in our universe, check out Marko Rodin; or take the 1-9 multiplication table and reduce all the numbers through addition, for example 10=1+0=1, 12=1+2=3, 14=1+4=5 ect. This produces what I'm dubbing the Layman's Fingerprint of God because you can see how 9 exerts its dominance over it all. If you add it all together you get 459 or 4+5+9=18=1+8=9 and how it is surrounded by 9 and has 9 running though it. Making 9 very similar to our description of God being one who is equal to it all, yet outside of it all, yet running through it all.

  • @TheJulioToboso
    @TheJulioToboso 6 років тому +62

    How do you make this animations? It’s awesome :)

    • @mathieugouttenoire9665
      @mathieugouttenoire9665 6 років тому +5

      Julio Toboso García he said in the description that he used a programming environnement called Processing, so I gess he programmed it himself

    • @marcosrios3626
      @marcosrios3626 6 років тому +7

      Processing is a really powerful visualization language.
      Look for The Coding Train on UA-cam, you will find a lot of tutorials.

    • @nahfid2003
      @nahfid2003 4 роки тому

      @@mathieugouttenoire9665 please remind me in a yearrr

    • @NeilRaouf
      @NeilRaouf 3 роки тому

      processing.org

    • @morgandavies9685
      @morgandavies9685 3 роки тому

      @@nahfid2003 it’s been 7 months, why did you want reminding in a year?

  • @dirt_dert_durt
    @dirt_dert_durt 3 роки тому

    Nightmare patric wants a hug

  • @ErnienatorLego
    @ErnienatorLego 3 роки тому

    The first triangle is very interesting.
    If you look at the pascall triangle. And always draw a dot for an odd number than you will get the exact same triangle pattern.
    Math ist beautifull

  • @smol9930
    @smol9930 3 роки тому +1

    Watching a one hour ad on a 2 minute video lets gooooooooooooooo

  • @carsonm6140
    @carsonm6140 6 років тому

    Cool. Mathematically makes sense, but awesome to see it in action

  • @mathiasbarreto5648
    @mathiasbarreto5648 6 років тому +2

    Interesting!

  • @angelicplace5615
    @angelicplace5615 Рік тому

    Woah nice Ultra Triforce!

  • @mescale
    @mescale 3 роки тому

    Wonderful!

  • @kaustubha7371
    @kaustubha7371 5 років тому

    Yet again the one didn't fail to impress me
    This time my mouth was open for 2 mins.
    Legendary!!! Just wait for me to get a job and I will pay half my salary💚

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  5 років тому +1

      really appreciate your comments. thank you for the support:)

    • @kaustubha7371
      @kaustubha7371 5 років тому

      Your videos are amazingly exciting for me.
      I could never imagine Maths could be so fun.
      Thank you.

  • @cubicardi8011
    @cubicardi8011 6 років тому +18

    You need more Subs!!!!

  • @Overthinkingerrors
    @Overthinkingerrors Рік тому

    The first one is called sierpínski’s triangle and it’s very cool

  • @kitanotatsu
    @kitanotatsu Рік тому

    I'll just note that the systems shown in the video are not chaotic: even though we might casually understand chaos as "random" (for example, in the context of a mob), mathematically speaking, that view is completely incorrect. Chaotic systems are fundmentally deterministic: if you know exactly how a system evolves and know the exact state of the system, you will be able to compute all past and future states of the system. Chaotic behaviour refers to how small changes in initial conditions of the system can produce vastly different behavious as time goes on. By contrast, with the systems shown in this video the next state is chosen at random: you can't predict with 100% certainty what the future states will be. That makes this video a demonstration of how stochastic processes - systems which evolve randomly - can sometimes form structures which are also interesting for other reasons.

  • @bharasiva96
    @bharasiva96 5 років тому

    Numberphile made a video on the same topic too. All those who liked this video should check that too. Just type in "Chaos Game Numberphile" on your UA-cam search and you should find it.

  • @mixbaal0
    @mixbaal0 3 роки тому

    Randomness is the name we give to the ocean of unknown.

  • @snowman7514
    @snowman7514 6 років тому

    beautiful

  • @pumpkinite4889
    @pumpkinite4889 Рік тому

    OH MY GOD WHAT?!
    I *never* knew that

  • @chaddusmaximus643
    @chaddusmaximus643 3 роки тому

    2:22 fancy patrick

  • @Ivan_1791
    @Ivan_1791 5 років тому +2

    Why does that happen?

  • @richardnormantaylor6556
    @richardnormantaylor6556 Рік тому

    Reality cannot be whatever you want because other people have different ideas of what is the center . The relation between your Center and other centers is what makes "reality"

  • @michaellight6981
    @michaellight6981 3 роки тому +1

    it's not exactly emerging from total chaos, since there are rules guiding where dots get placed, but nonetheless this is fascinating.

  • @duck3892
    @duck3892 6 років тому

    *THE TRIFORCEEEEEEEES*

  • @thingsfromspace
    @thingsfromspace 6 років тому

    Awesome! I think I saw this on numberphile, but this video took it further. Thanks!
    Btw, it's cool to see stuff done in processing. I've used it a few times, but mainly I just stick to python.

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому

      Thank you:) I haven't really tried coding in python so I don't really know the difference.

    • @MagicGonads
      @MagicGonads 6 років тому

      I did it in p5.js so it was easier to share with others and edit on any PC

  • @Snowy167
    @Snowy167 6 років тому

    Pretty cool

  • @nicholasauwaerts2280
    @nicholasauwaerts2280 6 років тому

    Really Really good vids! As a sience teacher this is gold! Thank you!!

  • @vpambs1pt
    @vpambs1pt 6 років тому +9

    It's rare to find youtube channels that produce the "style" of videos(which I enjoy) that you produce, not too long neither too short, a good explanation of what are you going to do/happening and I particularly liked the fact that you showed that the rule that we use at the triangle doesn't work with the square and showed how to correct it! And as always you choose a good song to follow the video with (:, for example I think that a piano song(Erik Satie for istance) wouldn't go as good as this song that you choosed went.
    Edit: I forgot to mention that that last few videos that you made, we can actually try it by ourselfs (and not only see a different/cool proof, say that's nice and close the video/investigate about it), one example is "Cutting a Möbius strip in half" ahahha.
    Sorry for my mediocre and redundant English.

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +2

      Thanks:) It's good to hear from people like you that they enjoy watching my videos. I don't think I would be making a lot more videos if not for feedback like yours. Glad you like the music choice as well. Tbh I've been really struggling in finding songs that sound good for the background of my videos. Most of the royalty free songs don't sound that well, so most of my videos get copyrighted for the songs I use. If you have any songs in mind that you think would be suitable for my future videos feel free to share haha. Thanks again for watching:)

    • @vpambs1pt
      @vpambs1pt 6 років тому

      I should be the one who thanks for posting the videos! I will try to finds the songs, but how can I "share" them?

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +1

      Nuno Mateus You can always email me at thinktwiceask@gmail.com , but you don't really have to look for the songs, dont want you to feel like you're being forced to do that. Thanks again:)

  • @hobowithabow9865
    @hobowithabow9865 6 років тому

    The first was sum good Zelda's lore shit

  • @maurolionelmipianoyyo11
    @maurolionelmipianoyyo11 3 роки тому

    0:53 wow look it’s the sirpenskiri triangle

  • @lordofsandvich3630
    @lordofsandvich3630 6 років тому +2

    Would you always get the same fractal given any point, or does the initial point matter? It seems like getting a perfect fractal would be impossible if the middle was selected.

  • @brenomoraes1
    @brenomoraes1 6 років тому

    Excelente video! Good job, keep up with the good work, please!

  • @ThatLonelyMeatball
    @ThatLonelyMeatball 3 роки тому +1

    the fact that there are no Zelda fans here saddens me

  • @LordDoome
    @LordDoome 6 років тому

    Order is chaos at its most chaotic point.

  • @NoNTr1v1aL
    @NoNTr1v1aL 6 років тому

    I absolutely love your videos!

  • @joesiu4972
    @joesiu4972 5 років тому

    that's cool

  • @tophu7903
    @tophu7903 6 років тому

    Out of chaos...
    Comes order.

  • @J7Handle
    @J7Handle 2 роки тому +1

    Ok, but this isn't chaos at all. It's randomness. Each starting point is mapped to a location 1/2 closer to a random vertex. If you map each point simultaneously to be 1/2 closer to each vertex, and then apply that mapping to every point in the starting triangle, it becomes obvious why the sierpinski triangle emerges. With the randomness added back, it becomes clear you're just taking a random sample of the sierpinski triangle. Take a large enough random sample of a sierpinski triangle, and ofc you'll get a sierpinski triangle. That's not chaos.

  • @gamingbutnotreally6077
    @gamingbutnotreally6077 5 років тому

    Good Stuff Man!

  • @RafaelBarrientos
    @RafaelBarrientos 6 років тому

    I love your animations!!!

  • @annazarovskaya2366
    @annazarovskaya2366 6 років тому

    Incredible! thank you! please keep it up!

  • @DONTHAWONN
    @DONTHAWONN 2 роки тому

    amazing

  • @ImaginaryMdA
    @ImaginaryMdA 3 роки тому +1

    What's the rule for the pentagon? It's pretty suspicious that it wasn't rotationally symmetric.

  • @thegrandestbazaar4800
    @thegrandestbazaar4800 3 роки тому

    Very good

  • @theshuman100
    @theshuman100 6 років тому

    Im calling you out on that triangle. If you drew a midpoint from a point to any random vertex it would pretty unlikely to be so close to the middle of an edge unless that point is in the corner

  • @GabrielsEpicLifeofGoals
    @GabrielsEpicLifeofGoals 6 років тому +12

    Wait, but what if I choose a part that is NOT part of the fractal in the first place??

    • @ThinkTwiceLtu
      @ThinkTwiceLtu  6 років тому +7

      Gabriel's Epic Life of Goals you will still get the same result

    • @trangium
      @trangium 6 років тому +9

      The first few points will not be on the fractal, but all future points will get exponentially closer to the fractal. So after 100 iterations, the point will only be less than 1/(2^100) of a unit away from the fractal.

    • @weakamna
      @weakamna 6 років тому +11

      You hit on a really interesting point there btw: these images are technically just very very close approximations of the fractals they describe. They are what is called strange attractors. Rulesets that somehow make points chosen at random "attract" into a shape. If the shape is a fractal, the attractor is called strange.

  • @angelscupboard
    @angelscupboard 6 років тому

    *the ultimate triforce*

  • @Vlow52
    @Vlow52 2 роки тому

    The fact that a closed shape is used and specific rules applied to put the point, the term chaos is a misuse. Fractals in this case are just approximation of all the possible variants in bound of a function, dozen of permutations doesn’t make it chaotic.

  • @islandmonusvi
    @islandmonusvi 6 років тому

    Inspired to program these examples in Mathematica CDF, thx

  • @smogy001
    @smogy001 5 років тому +1

    The star-like shape is supposed to be symmetrical

  • @brunnomenxa
    @brunnomenxa 3 роки тому

    Chaos, but it quickly creates a rule that iterates. Iteration is the beginning of a fractal.

  • @zygzag
    @zygzag 7 місяців тому

    The pentagonal fractal might me wrong. I made my own code and it looks nothing like the video; plus, you would expect it to be rotationally symmetrical