Chaos Game - Numberphile

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @numberphile
    @numberphile  4 роки тому +73

    Catch a more in-depth interview with Ben on our Numberphile Podcast: ua-cam.com/video/-tGni9ObJWk/v-deo.html

    • @CC-hx8gj
      @CC-hx8gj 4 роки тому

      based

    • @WhatWhy42
      @WhatWhy42 2 роки тому

      Are all the dice rolls done by hand or is it simulated random?

  • @Cragoon
    @Cragoon 7 років тому +655

    This is the shape of procrastination, always changing your mind halfway through different task.

    • @pinkraven4402
      @pinkraven4402 5 років тому +26

      So prpcrastination is a fractal

    • @tompeck5495
      @tompeck5495 5 років тому +11

      As someone who is watching this while procrastinating from homework this hit closer to home than I'd like.

    • @neerajkrishnang3916
      @neerajkrishnang3916 4 роки тому +14

      So that's how you end up Jack of all trades and master of none, because of all the holes in your skills..🤔

    • @blitsriderfield4099
      @blitsriderfield4099 3 роки тому +6

      so the shape of procrastination is the triforce...makes sense

    • @paulrussell1207
      @paulrussell1207 3 роки тому +7

      See the big triangle that gets left out? Your 1st class honours degree is hiding in there!

  • @acetate909
    @acetate909 6 років тому +458

    "I'm not going to go into the details. It's worth looking up".
    Dammit, you are the "looking up" process.

  • @STOG01
    @STOG01 7 років тому +2824

    This is suspiciously interesting.

    • @Triumvirate888
      @Triumvirate888 7 років тому +30

      One might even say Auspiciously interesting...

    • @STOG01
      @STOG01 7 років тому +36

      Anything mathematical is eventually auspicious. Just a matter of when.

    • @Lucerne9
      @Lucerne9 7 років тому +17

      It makes me fascinated to how mathematical reality is. Many assume biology and math are far apart, but then there's the affiliations like that in the video

    • @christosvoskresye
      @christosvoskresye 7 років тому +2

      That idea can be taken too far, Tate H, and often has in the past. It is possible today to extend the ancient fascination with numerology far beyond the positive integers.

    • @seamusandpat
      @seamusandpat 7 років тому +9

      Spaciously interesting!

  • @timchallenge
    @timchallenge 4 роки тому +57

    Chaos theory is literally my favorite area of mathematics, I would honestly love an entire channel dedicated simply to that one field.

    • @DLCS-2
      @DLCS-2 2 роки тому +3

      Same

  • @highlewelt9471
    @highlewelt9471 7 років тому +383

    Please more vids with this guy about chaos theory!

  • @hierro09
    @hierro09 7 років тому +1017

    Ben: "this is a familiar shape"
    Me: Yes of course it is, after many years of gaming I know it's a trif-
    Ben: "it's the Sierpinski gasket"
    Me: -erpinski gasket, yes... Worked with it a lot, sure.

    • @arthurthekyogre9155
      @arthurthekyogre9155 4 роки тому +69

      It's a triforce fractal

    • @anawesomepet
      @anawesomepet 4 роки тому +13

      What is a Sirepinski triangle? I only know about the triforce.

    • @ragnkja
      @ragnkja 4 роки тому +26

      SPSheep
      It’s what you get when you replace each filled triangle in the Triforce with a smaller Triforce, and repeat infinitely many times.

    • @brandoncarson905
      @brandoncarson905 3 роки тому +11

      @@ragnkja It's triforces all the way down...

    • @simonmultiverse6349
      @simonmultiverse6349 3 роки тому +4

      (1) those three points... move them a bit, so that it's not an equilateral triangle. Make it a long, skinny triangle if you want. Then the resulting Sierpinski gasket will be long and skinny. (2) OK, you want a SQUARE?? Easy: have four points, not three. Go halfway towards a (randomly-chosen) corner point, and plot your position as a point. Repeat it all day. (3) How about a distorted square, one that's seriously knocked out of shape. The same rules will result in a bent/twisted quadrilateral version of the Sierpinski gasket.

  • @alejandronq645
    @alejandronq645 7 років тому +816

    This is probably my favourite numberphile video ever made

  • @sirstar45
    @sirstar45 7 років тому +95

    When that simulation ran, my jaw genuinly dropped. That is so amazing I have no words.

    • @jamiedonaldson794
      @jamiedonaldson794 3 роки тому +2

      same I thought how? just how?

    • @AribZeeshan
      @AribZeeshan 2 роки тому

      @@jamiedonaldson794 Yes Bro.....This Is Crazy

  • @qwertyfinger
    @qwertyfinger 7 років тому +2102

    THIS IS THE WEIRDEST MATHS THING IVE EVER SEEN

    • @Triumvirate888
      @Triumvirate888 7 років тому +160

      I read a book a long time ago that had a quote in it that sums this up perfectly. "You look around and see the whole world falling apart. But you are wrong. The world is NOT falling apart. It is falling into place."

    • @DaveGeelen88
      @DaveGeelen88 7 років тому +23

      look for = hanoi binairy :D
      You will be amazed again

    • @JayTheYggdrasil
      @JayTheYggdrasil 7 років тому +5

      lifeinsepia just look up iterated function systems, it's almost the same thing but better

    • @michagrill9432
      @michagrill9432 7 років тому +1

      DeutschMaga Was isn dat? XD

    • @DaveGeelen88
      @DaveGeelen88 7 років тому

      towers of hanoi
      and the link to binary counting
      very amazing :D

  • @santinxt
    @santinxt 7 років тому +75

    If you play the same game in 3D with the vertices of a cube and the midpoints of the edges and instead of dividing the distances by 2 dividing them by 3, after enough iterations you will get a Menger sponge.

    • @Benny_Blue
      @Benny_Blue 3 роки тому +2

      Would that be going one third the distance, two thirds the distance, or either/or?

    • @santinxt
      @santinxt 3 роки тому +5

      @@Benny_Blue one third the distance. I'm actually not entirely sure what would happen if you took 2/3 the distance instead.

  • @emdadahmed5592
    @emdadahmed5592 7 років тому +199

    Thank you, numberphile, for another great video. Every video my fascination for fractals grows stronger

  • @knotwrite
    @knotwrite 7 років тому +331

    Watching this video is like peeling back the curtain on reality. I need to go sit down for a bit.

    • @imaclock8144
      @imaclock8144 7 років тому +34

      what did you ever think math was in the first place?

    • @uniqueusername_
      @uniqueusername_ 5 років тому +2

      im a clock I couldn’t have put it better. People who don’t like math confuse me.

    • @theliamofella
      @theliamofella 5 років тому +2

      I'm a clock and unique user name, so this is just obvious and not profound in any way? So what has this video got to say about mathematics, if you are fantastic at maths be humble about it

    • @theliamofella
      @theliamofella 5 років тому

      ?

    • @theliamofella
      @theliamofella 5 років тому +1

      Actually, I take that back, it doesn't mean anything profound about reality, it's just a shape that has to happen given the rules etc

  • @razielhamalakh9813
    @razielhamalakh9813 7 років тому +1695

    This man can't roll dice to save his life.

    • @IllIlIIllIlIl
      @IllIlIIllIlIl 7 років тому +70

      It's because of the paper. It cushions the dice faling and makes it slide instead.

    • @z-beeblebrox
      @z-beeblebrox 7 років тому +225

      I don't know, if his survival depended on rolling a 1 or 2, I think he'd be pretty safe!

    • @ZXLegend1
      @ZXLegend1 7 років тому +5

      Is this a Kaiji reference?

    • @MenacingBanjo
      @MenacingBanjo 7 років тому +126

      I guess that means he's going to... die.

    • @2dividedby3equals666
      @2dividedby3equals666 7 років тому +95

      That is not a dice it is a camouflaged Parker cube.

  • @WayneStakem
    @WayneStakem 7 років тому +64

    _"You unlock this door with the key of imagination. Beyond it is another dimension - a dimension of sound, a dimension of sight, a dimension of mind. You're moving into a land of both shadow and substance, of things and ideas. You've just crossed over into the Twilight Zone."_

  • @boalollal242
    @boalollal242 7 років тому +412

    Disappointed there wasn't a giant eye in the middle.

    • @theliamofella
      @theliamofella 5 років тому +10

      Or a ganja leaf lol

    • @raphaelkelly861
      @raphaelkelly861 4 роки тому +3

      @@theliamofella honestly though imagine something like that emerging from iterated randomness. Probably is some way to do it...

  • @Glumurinn
    @Glumurinn 7 років тому +4

    The bit starting at 3:15 is almost magical, and the music really makes it even more so!

  • @craken1566
    @craken1566 6 років тому +3

    4:56 the fact that also the starting point is replicated in the smaller triangle at the bottom right just blow my mind that's Crazy

  • @cobaltbluesky2276
    @cobaltbluesky2276 2 роки тому +10

    “Slightly disturbed about reality” prefectly describes how I felt when that shape appeared. I am a changed man

  • @whoeveriam0iam14222
    @whoeveriam0iam14222 7 років тому +507

    can you share that drawing dots program with us? it looks fun to play with
    edit: it's in the description now =D

    • @tsugua001
      @tsugua001 7 років тому +26

      It's called geogebra, I have no idea how he did it though

    • @turun_ambartanen
      @turun_ambartanen 7 років тому +7

      then he should share the .ggb (or whatever) file. the fern doesn't look like it was in geogebra though.

    • @Brotcrunsher
      @Brotcrunsher 7 років тому +119

      whoeveriam0iam14222 I could code this quickly and i probably will. If enough people are interessted then I will share it and make it open source on github.

    •  7 років тому +8

      we are very interested

    • @turun_ambartanen
      @turun_ambartanen 7 років тому +3

      I am very interested.

  • @pietro9801
    @pietro9801 3 роки тому +3

    5:20 if you are wondering why it doesn't work, the rule is move 2/3 of the way

  • @mighty8357
    @mighty8357 7 років тому +142

    I'm genuinely baffled by this result :O I would have never guessed that rolling a dice could be linked to fractal theory!

    • @DarkTF2Director
      @DarkTF2Director 7 років тому +23

      it has to do more with he fact hat he always moves half the distance and he only has specific point where to aim

    • @gavinhowe9897
      @gavinhowe9897 7 років тому +55

      the rules are the fractal, not the randomness, the rules chosen in these scenarios are more like stencils, with the dice being more of a spray paint.

    • @hhouse1234
      @hhouse1234 7 років тому +8

      cool analogy! :)

    • @benbooth2783
      @benbooth2783 3 роки тому +3

      There is no information that can create structure in the random set of numbers generated by the dice. The structure comes from the number of dots and the rules.

    • @simonmultiverse6349
      @simonmultiverse6349 2 роки тому

      The die just takes you on a random walk through the possibilities. The rule (i.e. move half-way to one of the three fixed points) defines the shape. The die just causes you to sample all possible combinations of moves. You could EQUALLY WELL systematically try moves 1,2,3 then 11 12 13 21 22 23 31 32 33 then 111 112 113 121 122 123 131 132 etc. then all combinations of 4 points then all combinations of 5 points, etc.
      That would be a SYSTEMATIC sample, but you'd visit every possible combination eventually. The die makes you visit every possible combination/point but in RANDOM order.
      One way makes you visit every point systematically; the other way makes you visit every point in random order.

  • @boobyjustin
    @boobyjustin 7 років тому +104

    That gave my goose bumps' goose bumps goose bumps

    • @danielodors
      @danielodors 6 років тому +13

      Justin Booby your goose bumps became fractals.

    • @simonmultiverse6349
      @simonmultiverse6349 3 роки тому

      @Stone H Here's a fractal: bufbufbufbufbufbufbufbufbufbufbufbufbufbufbufbuffalofalofalofalofalofalofalofalofalofalofalofalofalofalofalofalo

  • @simonmultiverse6349
    @simonmultiverse6349 3 роки тому +3

    In the Sierpinski gasket, there is a very simple way of proving that the central large triangle is always empty. You imagine that a point lies in that central triangle, i.e. it has started somewhere and it has gone half-way towards one of the points. Pick point A as an example. If we go half-way towards point A, and land in the central triangle, all you do is ask the question: WHERE DID WE START FROM? You will find that, if you land in the central triangle, you must have been outside the overall shape, in order to land inside that central triangle. Since the rules are that you always start inside the triangle, you can never get out of the triangle, therefore you will never land in that central triangle. Ergo, the central triangle is always empty.

  • @ivanberdichevsky5679
    @ivanberdichevsky5679 3 роки тому +5

    3:49 "This is a familiar shape" , of course it is! That's the Triforce from The Legend of Zelda

  • @JohnSmith-kc6ov
    @JohnSmith-kc6ov 5 років тому +24

    This is one of the few math things that made me go "holy sh*t"

  • @iammaxhailme
    @iammaxhailme 7 років тому +424


    ▲ ▲

  • @Alexander-is9jo
    @Alexander-is9jo 3 роки тому +8

    This is absolutely mind-blowing

  • @theorist-qx4vz
    @theorist-qx4vz 7 років тому +6

    Wow wow.
    Predictable in the relative macro-scale, chaos system is insane, and beautiful.

  • @suvetar
    @suvetar 9 місяців тому

    I love the whole concept of emergent behaviour, it's the computer science equivalent of the importance of hearing someone in the laboritory repeating an experiement and saying the equivalent of "That' odd/strange/cool/unbelievable!"
    Thanks as always folks 🙂

  • @swingardium706
    @swingardium706 7 років тому +335

    *Vi Hart screaming in the distance*

  • @klaasbil8459
    @klaasbil8459 2 роки тому +1

    6:21 that is incredible! I shouted out loud Wow!

  • @khan_msj5680
    @khan_msj5680 7 років тому +28

    how dislike the video, this is the most interesting video ever...

    • @bingobangini
      @bingobangini 3 роки тому

      because it's kinda misleading...

  • @rukia3947
    @rukia3947 7 років тому +2

    This is soooo cool!!! I wrote and tried out the program at home and it came beautifully! It never ceases to fascinate me!

  • @DashedSimpusMaximus
    @DashedSimpusMaximus 7 років тому +104

    "The rules of the universe can be written down on a single piece of paper"
    Math is the language of god it seems.

    • @Bleagle
      @Bleagle 4 роки тому +12

      It's the language of structure/patterns, and without those (think pure chaos) life can't form or exist long enough to become intelligent. no intelligent life => noone to discover math

    • @DomCurtis2023
      @DomCurtis2023 3 роки тому

      Look up nikola Tesla and his 369 theory

    • @lonestarr1490
      @lonestarr1490 3 роки тому +6

      Makes you think. The universe could have been invented one evening in a bar, as a brief and sketchy calculation on a napkin.

    • @sillysausage4549
      @sillysausage4549 2 роки тому

      S

  • @Benny_Blue
    @Benny_Blue 3 роки тому +1

    Two questions about the “attractors” you mentioned:
    1) When you put the point in the middle to start, it’s obviously NOT on the Sierpinski Triangle in that case. But very quickly, it appears to reach it, and stay there. Does it really reach it that soon, and then always hit points on it? Is it constantly getting closer and closer to the triangle, but never reaching it? Or is it constantly very close to it, but never touching it until the point “almost certainly” gets lucky and lands on a genuine point on the triangle, at which point it stays on it forever?
    2) The case you show of a point in the middle has the point move towards the same corner several times in a row. If you started with an arbitrarily long string of luck, and never moved towards the same point twice in a row, would it still approach the triangle? Or is that streak necessary for the attractor to work?

  • @frankfranksen204
    @frankfranksen204 7 років тому +18

    Cool things happen if you go twice the distance instead of half. Doesn't diverge and looks different every time, kind of like DNA in its densely packed state in the nucleus.

    • @fakename3344
      @fakename3344 6 років тому +2

      Could you link to an example of that? And maybe comment after you do? UA-cam likes to tell you that it's posted comments with links when it really didn't.

    • @nonazjr5120
      @nonazjr5120 5 років тому +4

      @@fakename3344 You can easily do it in the link I posted as another comment and on my Twitter (@Nonaz_jr). You can DM me if you need help.

  • @SocksWithSandals
    @SocksWithSandals 5 років тому +1

    Loved the mystical sitar chord during the computer fractal render.

  • @matthewd759
    @matthewd759 7 років тому +33

    I couldn't resist but stay late and create this on Excel after work... on a Friday....

  • @sayanbiswas9094
    @sayanbiswas9094 7 років тому

    This video is arousing, literally arousing. Kudos Ben Sparks

  • @peepock7796
    @peepock7796 5 років тому +5

    3:14
    I immediately recognized that as serpinsky’s triangle.
    I drew it in my grade 7 science binder!

  • @ferax_aqua
    @ferax_aqua 7 років тому

    The last bit about ferns is certainly fantastic and inspiring for the computer folks out there, myself included. A million upvotes I would like to give to this one, if possible.

  • @props3311
    @props3311 7 років тому +816

    Triforce confirmed

    • @DarkTF2Director
      @DarkTF2Director 7 років тому +10

      GermanLoLCaster my first thought was "oh it looks like a triforce"

    • @GuyWithAnAmazingHat
      @GuyWithAnAmazingHat 7 років тому +17

      Seems like the Triforce is indeed the Power of the Gods.

    • @ale_schneider
      @ale_schneider 7 років тому +2

      It specially reminds me of Deus Ex. Like, this is the most Deus Ex thing I've seen in a while.

    • @fricktion01
      @fricktion01 7 років тому +1

      %triforce

    • @megatrix500
      @megatrix500 7 років тому +3

      you mean infiniforce

  • @emilianonavarro2858
    @emilianonavarro2858 7 років тому

    I just managed to program the thing in Octave(GUI). It's simply amazing, and the code is so simple. Breathtaking.

  • @raiyanbasher9529
    @raiyanbasher9529 7 років тому +3

    This is the best video of numberphile
    Together with the pizza one and minus one by 12 one.

  • @HunterJE
    @HunterJE Рік тому +1

    The origin of the pattern gets easier to intuitively grasp if you think about the problem backwards, e.g. note that if a midpoint is in the central void, all the points twice that distance from each of the three corners are outside triangle ABC, so no point inside the triangle will result in a midpoint inside the central void*. Once you have that you can see that the next order of voids can only be reached when stepping from points inside the central void and so on down from there....
    *there's an extra zeroth step if you want to consider the "outside start" version, which is to convince yourself that an outside start will result in points moving steadily towards the triangle and once they are inside the triangle will stay there forever

  • @DonGeritch
    @DonGeritch 7 років тому +6

    At first I thought - oh, this seems a lot like my life (changing goals all the time and not reaching anything, no matter how close I get). But seeing the result got me thinking..

  • @spencerwadsworth7024
    @spencerwadsworth7024 7 років тому +2

    This is one of the most intense surprises I have ever experienced

  • @IMadeOfClay
    @IMadeOfClay 7 років тому +15

    Years ago I was playing around on my calculator in maths class and I noticed something strange:
    tan 89= 57.28996163
    tan 89.9= 572.9572134
    tan 89.99= 5729.577893
    tan 89.999= 57295.77951
    tan 89.9999= 572957.7951
    tan 89.99999= 5729577.951
    If you compare this to how many degrees in a radian (57.29577951) you notice two things:
    (i) the order of the digits get closer and closer to the order of 1 radian (in degrees),
    (ii) each time the numbers increase by approximately a factor of ten.
    I'm not a professional mathematician. I wonder if anyone can give me an answer after all these years. Then I can die peacefully lol.

    • @glenneric1
      @glenneric1 5 років тому +6

      As you keep going to 1/10th the remaining distance from your angle to 90 degrees you keep multiplying the tangent by 10/1... 10/1 and 1/10 are reciprocals, as you might expect for a line approaching infinite steepness.

    • @dieselguitar1440
      @dieselguitar1440 4 роки тому +3

      I hope you still get this notification after 2 years. As x (in degrees) approaches 0, tan(90-x)/tan(90-(x/n)) approaches n, n=10 in this case. This is because tanx=sinx/cosx. As x approaches 0 and 90-x approaches 90, sinx is basically 1, while cos x becomes nearly proportional to x (zoom in real close on cosx at x = 90 degrees and you'll see it's basically a line going straight through the origin, that is to say, y is x times a constant.) So, when you divide the difference from 90 by 10, sin stays pretty much the same, while cos goes down by a factor of pretty much 10, and so tanx=sinx/cosx gets multiplies by 1/(1/10)=10. If my statements about the behaviour of sin and cos don't make sense to you, you should know that their values correspond to the y and x axes respectively for sin and cos, which should serve as an intuitive/visual basis for understanding all this. I didn't look this up, I figured it out from intuition of the trig functions, it's a valuable skill.

    • @redtoxic8701
      @redtoxic8701 3 роки тому

      It's just an exercise of limits. If you want to see the proof to your question just tell me, I'll post it on imgur

    • @FlyingSagittarius
      @FlyingSagittarius 2 роки тому

      @@dieselguitar1440 hey, you never know when someone stumbles upon this two years later and wants to know the answer too. 😋

  • @siddhartharoy2233
    @siddhartharoy2233 6 років тому +1

    Its a strange pattern that makes me think deeply...thanks Numberphile for such an amazing video...as a math geek I will be waiting for more videos like this

  • @aleratz
    @aleratz 7 років тому +15

    I am pretty sure that if you do it too much you end up summoning some kind of demon.

  • @mementomori7160
    @mementomori7160 5 років тому

    Now(I'm watching this 2nd or 3rd time) I understand this and see the beauty. Beauty in randomness. π, triangles, everything is hidden in randomness. Math is the one and only true art.

  • @dgtlrn
    @dgtlrn 7 років тому +104

    But what if Wil Wheaton rolled the dice?

    • @bobrobert1123
      @bobrobert1123 7 років тому +4

      This comment

    • @nblack3879
      @nblack3879 7 років тому +29

      A straight line that infinitely points towards one.

    • @qwertyquazo673
      @qwertyquazo673 7 років тому +1

      Excellent question.

    • @bravojr
      @bravojr 7 років тому +7

      I can think of no other man who fails so hard he breaks chaos...
      Brilliant!

    • @bobrobert1123
      @bobrobert1123 7 років тому +2

      Is that a pit of acid?

  • @JoshLewa
    @JoshLewa 7 років тому

    This is my second favorite video after the sum of all natural numbers video series. So interesting!

  • @CorrectHorseBatteryStaple472
    @CorrectHorseBatteryStaple472 7 років тому +8

    Very interesting but I wouldn't say it's baffling. Just reverse engineer the point in the middle of the Serpinski Triangle. How do you get there? No point in that triangle is halfway between anything and one of the vertices.

    • @CorrectHorseBatteryStaple472
      @CorrectHorseBatteryStaple472 7 років тому +2

      ***** not halfway between two vertices. Halfway between a vertex and SOMETHING. Consider the middle empty triangle. What would that something have to be in order to land inside it? It would have to be outside the triangle.

    • @markstoner3786
      @markstoner3786 7 років тому +1

      Andrew Pearce exactly what I was thinking. Those areas are empty because they are impossible to reach with the given restraints.

    • @MrDannyDetail
      @MrDannyDetail 6 років тому

      @@CorrectHorseBatteryStaple472 Maybe it would have to be outside the triangle, but that is allowed and possible according to what he said.

  • @miksurankaviita
    @miksurankaviita 7 років тому

    The best video from Numberphile for a while

  • @rosiefay7283
    @rosiefay7283 5 років тому +3

    2:35 Parker randomness?

  • @chrissalinas325
    @chrissalinas325 7 років тому +1

    Probably the coolest Numberphile video

  • @neingeben9510
    @neingeben9510 7 років тому +4

    I've seen this shape before when working with Cellular Automatons

    • @simonmultiverse6349
      @simonmultiverse6349 3 роки тому

      Can we have that argument about "automatons" v. "automata" ? Please? Please please PLEEEEEEEEEEEEASE?

  • @Wild4lon
    @Wild4lon 7 років тому

    I learned this in an extra curricular maths course and about the applications of serpkinski triangles! It's honestly fascinating

  • @peterbutterjam97
    @peterbutterjam97 7 років тому +46

    Is this the sort of thing that's known as procedural generation?

    • @ferko28
      @ferko28 7 років тому +13

      Yep.

    • @JackieChan173
      @JackieChan173 7 років тому +34

      the only thing in common between all the things known as procedural generation is they go
      random numbers -> things

    • @EmanuelMay
      @EmanuelMay 7 років тому +18

      Nope, you don't even need random numbers for procedural generation. Just - as the name suggest - a procedure. Does not have to be random at all (can be deterministicly based on previous events for example) , but randomness can be quite useful.

  • @iambranden
    @iambranden 3 роки тому

    This was incredible!!!! Thank you for taking the time to make this video!

  • @morismateljan6458
    @morismateljan6458 7 років тому +3

    Astounding! But what shape would appear if we tried that with 3D object?????

    • @bevkcan
      @bevkcan 7 років тому +2

      the sierpinski tetrahedron

    • @Jordan-mn2ty
      @Jordan-mn2ty 6 років тому

      Or a circle with infinitely many points

  • @SK8fourL1F3
    @SK8fourL1F3 7 років тому +1

    wasn't sure I would enjoy this video at the start but it turned out to be extremely interesting!

  • @dalitas
    @dalitas 7 років тому +6

    I genuinely went "what the...."

  • @TheTechnoLocker
    @TheTechnoLocker 7 років тому

    This is my favourite kind of Numberphile video

  • @Radar_of_the_Stars
    @Radar_of_the_Stars 7 років тому +40

    So close to the triforce, but yet so far

    • @calvinscheuerman
      @calvinscheuerman 7 років тому +17

      Sierpinski's triangle is actually made up of an *infinite* number of Triforces.
      *Infinite triforce = pretty cool.*
      (Also probably a nintendo-core band name.)

    • @Radar_of_the_Stars
      @Radar_of_the_Stars 7 років тому

      Cool!

  • @spencerallbritton9459
    @spencerallbritton9459 7 років тому

    I'm majoring in Electrical Engineering but I love Mathematics. It's logical, precise, absurdly useful, and highly mysterious at the same time.

  • @hingheng1234
    @hingheng1234 7 років тому +7

    this is crazy

  • @naraferalina2308
    @naraferalina2308 Рік тому +1

    Math is a discovery, invention and art.

  • @LudwigvanBeethoven2
    @LudwigvanBeethoven2 6 років тому +2

    We live in a simulation.
    A simulation where we live in.

  • @avananana
    @avananana 6 років тому

    Before I watched the video entirely, I created a Processing program to see what you were up to, and when I saw that the Sierpinskí triangle appeared out of nowhere, according to the rules, it completely blew my mind. This is some crazy stuff going on.

  • @jimmorrison6177
    @jimmorrison6177 7 років тому +5

    Interesting

  • @HelpfulFlyingpig
    @HelpfulFlyingpig 6 років тому

    I can’t describe how incredible this video is

  • @secret12392
    @secret12392 7 років тому +14

    What was the website used here?

    • @TotodileSmile3721
      @TotodileSmile3721 7 років тому +3

      Stormageddon +

    • @TheMathestar
      @TheMathestar 7 років тому +16

      if you mean the software for that simulation, they're not using a website but the geometry program GeoGebra

  • @567legodude
    @567legodude 7 років тому

    Before you even mentioned the part about the computer, I wrote a script to do it and I was extremely amazed at what was showing up on my screen.

  • @jyotishkaraychoudhury4762
    @jyotishkaraychoudhury4762 7 років тому +8

    For the first time....
    I'm seeing that a video has not got any dislikes till now.
    (Right now, it has got 181 likes)

  • @retsapb6319
    @retsapb6319 3 роки тому

    Incredibly complex patterns arising from simple rules. Amazing

  • @Varun2799
    @Varun2799 7 років тому +225

    illuminati confirmed

  • @SorcerorNobody
    @SorcerorNobody Рік тому +2

    I'm very familiar with the chaos game generating the gasket, and that changing the vertices and distances generates other similar geometries.
    But the two triangles ruleset is new to me and my mouth genuinely dropped open as soon as I saw what it generated.

  • @explodingCR33P3R
    @explodingCR33P3R 7 років тому +3

    WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @MrHeroicDemon
    @MrHeroicDemon 5 років тому

    He is one of my favorites because the things he chooses to talk about are like the secret low key super interesting ones.

  • @martinusny
    @martinusny 7 років тому +7

    wow.....

  • @gallifrog6144
    @gallifrog6144 2 роки тому

    When I saw the Sepinski triangle emerge I gasped, my mind was so utterly blown by this

  • @SylvEdu
    @SylvEdu 7 років тому +40

    Math is the language in which God spoke to create the universe.

    • @SylvEdu
      @SylvEdu 7 років тому +10

      Atheists literally cannot help but spill their spaghetti all over the place. Calm down, fellas. Just scroll past it.

    • @calvinscheuerman
      @calvinscheuerman 7 років тому +2

      Spill their spaghetti? That is the best thing I've ever heard.

    • @SylvEdu
      @SylvEdu 7 років тому +5

      "He made a universe with very specific and structured rules, of course there's going to be an underlying pattern, even if the events within that universe appear random."
      6:00

    • @autodidactusplaysjrpgs7614
      @autodidactusplaysjrpgs7614 7 років тому +3

      Unverifiable hypothesis much?

    • @calvinscheuerman
      @calvinscheuerman 7 років тому +3

      Come on, Autodidactus Communitati ; Don't spill your spaghetti.

  • @hiimapop7755
    @hiimapop7755 5 років тому +1

    This is actually mind-blowing for me.

  • @aryankumarprasad1574
    @aryankumarprasad1574 4 роки тому +3

    Am the only one who feels creepy ?

  • @platonitosocratico1597
    @platonitosocratico1597 7 років тому

    PLEASE I NEED MORE BLOWING MIND THINGS LIKE THIS!!

  • @brandon2762
    @brandon2762 7 років тому +13

    The framing of this is totally misleading. Yes, the results are randomized, but the randomness is forced through constraints. Of course there is going to be a pattern.
    It definitely is interesting how nature forms patterns based on randomness but it isn't disturbing or spooky, that's just how it is.

    • @olauda
      @olauda 7 років тому +5

      I think the fact that's how it is is what makes it disturbing or spooky to people.

  • @aBigBadWolf
    @aBigBadWolf 7 років тому

    I've been thinking about this. I would say the dice is not really an essential part of this emergent property. But the rule of the movements are. By randomly drawing from the possible actions from every spot we then converge to the true mean which ends up to be this form. So we have in a way encoded this form/attractor by choosing that set of rules.I wonder if we can do it the other way around. Define the set of rules that leads to a specifc form

  • @heaslyben
    @heaslyben 7 років тому

    Really cool! I didn't expect the outcome. It would be fun to talk/watch a video about why the structure emerges. One observation is, say I land in the dark spot in the middle. Then I must have started at a point twice as far away WRT one vertex, which would be outside the triangle, which shouldn't have happened. So I won't land in the dark spot in the middle. And then...fractal...

  • @SteveD826
    @SteveD826 7 років тому

    I sprinted to my math professor with this video. He audibly gasped when the shape began to be revealed.

  • @lifter1000
    @lifter1000 2 роки тому

    Thank you Ben Sparks, your subjects are amazingly beautiful 🙏

  • @NassosConqueso
    @NassosConqueso 7 років тому

    A lot more interesting that I was expecting!!

  • @Benrob55
    @Benrob55 7 років тому

    That Sierpinski gasket program was one of the first programs I ever wrote years ago! I had no idea how it worked at the time and this video finally explained it! :D

  • @lolechi
    @lolechi 4 роки тому

    Almost fell out of my chair when those triangles appeared! Amazing!

  • @Astro-X
    @Astro-X 7 років тому

    One of the much better videos you have posted! Not that there are any bad videos...

  • @earlwirth9614
    @earlwirth9614 6 років тому

    You can get this by generating a Linear Recursive Sequence and graphically raster the binary sequence of 0's and 1's at specific widths. The function f(x) = X^15 + X^1 + 1 rastered on widths of 239 or 9538 or 32528 or 23229 will produce Sierpinski triangles.

  • @vijaymohan1307
    @vijaymohan1307 7 років тому

    I was expecting some ready links to Barnsley fern and related topics. Of course I will look it up now :) Amazing.

  • @marcelweber7813
    @marcelweber7813 7 років тому

    Once I heard "triangle" and "half way", "Sierpinski" rang in my ears. I guess I'm officially numberphiled 4 life!