@@lbnomad4042 Cabang ekstrim agama Ibrahim sangat fanatik dan tidak memberikan kontribusi apa pun kepada umat manusia, hanya tahu cara menyedot minyak dan menjualnya, serta dalam sejarah dan zaman modern mengkhususkan diri pada penghancuran. 😅
I am thankful for bringing India and south east Asian history. Most channels focus only on China and Japan when history of India is very unique and influenced places from Afghanistan to Japan. India also indirectly affected the history of the Americas as the Europeans were originally searching for sea routes to India.
It's good to see a documentary on Indian culture and history and we should be thankful but that doesn't mean we should brag about the documentary on other cultures. China has a rich history and the fact that their culture was left untouched even when invaders invaded unlike India where many converted to foreign religions. Also most people that aren't into history are still more likely to be a weeb obsessed with Japanese culture hence for the views content creators usually make series on Japan.
@@dsbdsb6637 dude they were invaded many times but the Chinese culture never fades. It was always there which is why they still have their own letters unlike vietnam who were told to use roman letters or in some cases they were not allowed to speak their own languages which is why many Africans speak French and Portuguese
There have been links between Odia traders (Sadhabas) and the South East Asian Regions like Cambodia, Bali, Java and Sumatra. Infact Kaudinya I, one of the kings of Cambodia was an Sadhaba merchant from Kalinga (present Odisha). In fact the rich maritime history and cultural connections exist to this day: Every year after Kartik Purnima, Bali Yatra takes place in Odisha in memory of the old maritime voyages to Bali. Also the name Ayuthya of the Thai kingdom comes from Ayodhya (present day Uttar Pradesh, and the capital of Lord Rama in Ramayana). Even today you can find symbols like Garuda in Indonesia (who is the holy mount of Lord Vishnu).
Yes! We have a legend for the meeting of Kaundinya and Queen Soma, and the first Hinduized polity kingdom of Southeast Asia, FUNAN, a genetically and archaeologically proven Khmer site (the artefacts of the Khmer style regardless of Thai and Vietnamese nationalist comments)!
You fail to mention that Kanishkar was a great patron of Buddhist and Hindu art, the Ayurveda and other Hindu developments. The caves were both Hindu and Buddhist and they developed on each other. Angkor Wat was also built by the South Indian Kings, who were responsible for the spread of Hindu Culture to Malaysia.
People simping for monarchs based on identity are real suckers. All elites of all identities collaborated with all the rulers to maintain regional control. All rulers to various degrees left these people to themselves if they got taxes and consctipts.
Rulers, mughal or not depended on the casteist feudal structure of india to maintain their rule. Good riddance to kings and monarchies. Just wish we could Louis XVI some of them.
@@arjunravichandran7578 i don't think so. What about such big institutions like Nalanda and Takshashila and other great universities. Feudal structure came after the local native system was destroyed by invasions.
Great content! Filipino here. Visayas Island Group (Bisaya) from the Philippines most likely came from the Sri Vijaya kingdom as a tribute state. There’s even the well documented Raja Humabon (a Malay Raja) who is listed as the first Malay king baptized as a Christian. Bisaya language is also the closest to Bahasa Indonesian language in the Philippines. Mabuhay Ma-Phil-Indo.
Bisya (vijya) is what the local ati (natives) called the sri vijayan exiles who landed in Panay. Bisaya as a term was only used for the people of panay (kedatuan ti madjaas). The people of cebu on the other hand were chola. While panay was populated by sri vijayan exiles of pannai after sri vijaya fell to the invading chola, cebu on the other hand was founded by sri lumayana, a half sri vijayan/chola prince. He was ordered by the chola maharajah (his dad) to establish a military outpost near panay (the sri vijayans). Sri lumayana rebelled and established the kingdom of singhapala. Later on, cebu fell under the bisaya sphere of influence and their people started calling themselves bisaya. Although the paanish called them pintados
*Palembang not Malay, Srivijaya is Palembang's empire, search the Palimbang town in Visayan region, that's where Srivijaya empire started their influence in Visayan region in general. The region named as _Palimbang_ because their ancestors came from Palembang in southeastern Sumatra (Indonesia).
@@mofb8331 Palembang are ethnically Palembang, they speak Palembang language, Malays born from Palembang, and in fact Malay just a dialect of Palembang! stop twisting the history! English are born from German and in fact dialect of German, not the other way around!
i think in Indonesia and Malaysia, Theravada was adopted during the medieval era.. after Islam introduced to archipelago, and then colonialism began, Hindus and Buddhists declined.. and today both Indonesian and Malaysian are Mahayana because from Chinese diaspora..
Mahayana is a water down mix teaching of Theravada and ancient Greek / Hellenistc. They even brought statues carving to South Asia and Far East Asia. The same way how Hellenistc / Western Nomads brought horses to ancient China..
@@e_puji_r Its older than medieval era more like classical period. Ancient Cambodian were Buddhist and than converted to Hinduism afterward. The earliest historical reference to Funan (Ancient Cambodia) is a Chinese description of a mission that visited the country in the third century A.D. Funan reached its zenith in the fifth century A.D.. Beginning in the early sixth century, civil wars and dynastic strife undermined Funan's stability, making it relatively easy prey to incursions by hostile neighbors. By the end of the seventh century, a northern neighbor, the kingdom of Chenla, had reduced Funan to a vassal state. [Library of Congress]
Kaladi inscription in Java 909 ce wrote : People of ariya dravidia pandhya shinghala kling, Khmer Mon Cham, and hunjeman (Arab Farsi Rom merchants) are FOREIGNERS who must pay foreigners tax as workers or merchants in Java. They not allowed to live in city or villages just in ports. This inscription have many serial inscription until 1520 ce. 👍
Yep, in many scripture ancient Javanese social hierarchy in ancient java is a little bit different with other regions, the closer you are with wealth your social status will be lower, that's why you'll find some story about how a mere farmer or skilled blacksmith could have higher status in society than the most wealthiest merchant or even with some royal family (because in ancient java only descendant from the king allowed to build their own village.) There is also exist some independent region made from alliance of many village (not a kingdom) that don't pay tax and even the king aren't allowed to bring soldiers inside the village.
@@champaputih4568 khmer is probably closely related to javanese in ancient past. in recent dna test it's found that javanese, sundanese and balinese is more than 50% austroasiatic, genetically we are more related to mainland south east asia than other maritime south east asian, but culturally we are maritime south east asia.
@@itsvan5791 merchant was also among the low status in ancient china, their logic was merchant didn't produce anything, while farmer produced food, and soldier defend the country. it has nothing to do with wealth actually.
@@ahyarhartanto1802 Some specialists said the people of Southeast Asia was the centre of western trade since before the history era. They already had their own identities and civilizations before Indian Sphere. It might be possible that they between Austro-asiatic and Austronesian (who were martime travellers) related together or mixed at least 2000 BC. They had strongly relationship together. Even Though the Funan were possible some of them were Austronesians who came or lived in Cambodia.
I am from north India . I own everything to gurjar pratihar , rashtrakutas and karkota . These Indian empires saved India from islam upto 500 years . India arab fought almost 20 wars but Indian empires won almost all wars except sindh . The first successful invasion on mainland India occured on 12 00 AD . Arab caliphate ended on the boundries of India otherwise whole north India would be islamic . The end of Most ancient civilization would happen .
Not north India but sindh in pakistan. Raja Dahir was the first hindu king to face the arab invasion in 7th century AD. He died during the battle and his daughters were taken as sex slaves to the arabic caliphate. Then there were kings in kashmir like lalitaditya muktapida who fought against the arabs. These kings are highly overlooked. The rest is known to most people- how rajputs fought against the arabic invasion. it was more like constant resistance that saved India from becoming Islamic. Rest of the civilisations like persia, mesopotamia succumbed to it.
@@ashishtiwari1912no king dhair daughters along with their mother ( queen) did johar as per Wikipedia.. I think same is written in chahnama ( muslim record of that time )
first as a sundanese, you got the wrong maps for majapahit, cus Sundanese never fall to the hand of Majapahit. and i love how you point out that women have equal positions in a lot of SEA culture, and that is true. even Hinduism can't change that until the abrahamic religions come especially Islam and Christian. Sometimes i feel like its actually a down fall for South East Asian when they adapt the abrahamic religions.
@@navinkumarpk86 there is also some muslim queen aka Sultanah, for me Hindu and Islam doesnt have really different when it comes to threating women as a second class citizen.
As a Filipino, we were christianized. But in the Philippines we still considered women as equals. Like in ancient times. The only time women are considered less is when the Spanish is in charge and considered them less than men. But Filipinos always considered them as partners. Through out Philippine History they proved their role in society like the Babaylans in pre-hispanic, and revolutionary leaders like Gabriella Silang and Tandang Sora, and Teresa Magbanua in WW2 the only Female Guerilla Leader. Also I'm a man and I respect Women.
The fact that many manuscript stolen or burned during colonialism era really suppressed the identity of South East Asian. We forget about how our people civlization are actually not lesser than middle east, europe, or egypt, they just different. Different value, different language, and different form of governance
I don't know what the European colonists did to suppress the S E history and culture, but it is my conclusion from my reading of history that we Indians should be grateful to the European colonists and missionaries who researched and dug up Indian history from Harappan until the nineteenth century. The west Asian muslim chroniclers also contributed substantially.
@@jamesmk1841 From what I knew, they brought many of our old manuscripts during colonialism. Most of our old manuscripts regarding to our history , notes, civil administration during Majaphit era,etc are still on Leiden university,Netherland. Colonialist knew exactly what important for the area they colonized, and not just gold, spices or any other resources, but also the history of the nation they colonized in order to imply inferiority complex to the people they colonized. Colonized people mostly forget about how great they are before being colonized because many of that notes regarding to that are taken by the colonizer. For example As Hindustan yourself, you are great nation, many early civilizations come from your area, but thats all we all knew. The notes regarding to the details of that era and after before colonisation begun usually starts to fade in details. Imagine when the europe still in dark era, your people have been able to live in rich with structured trade city. It is a bit funny when colonizer come, suddenly we are thought as non developed and barbar nations or people, while we knew our nations thriving all this time even without them with our own value and way of life. Western are not the sole bearer of modern knowledge, China,Arab, even Hindustan are contribute their share into todays modern life. There will be no modern time without paper invented in China and brought by Arabs to all this world. The colonization all this time that make us start to think that we are inferior without them, I think the video above explained a bit about it to justify the colonisation effort they done.
@@jamesmk1841Part of what you said is correct. The missionaries? No! Do you know Sanskrit posses the largest manuscript tradition in the world! By conservative estimate, they are approximately 50 million manuscripts, not to mention the lost and destroyed ones.
@@JMB_focusno. it creates confusion and feels like youre borrowing from other's culture. look at thailand. barely contaminated. they are thai, buddhist, and all pure their culture. i envy them
just look at the fact that for thousands of years India was ruled by Muslim governments and the Hindu Buddhist Dharma people there couldn't do anything about it. and it was during this period that the Hindu-Buddhist kingdoms of Indonesia controlled Southeast Asia and spread the teachings of the Dharma from the Hindu-Buddhist patterned kingdoms. it was from this kingdom that ruled for Dharma when India was ruled by Muslim Empires for thousands of years. SalakaNegara kingdom Kutai Kartanegara kingdom Tarumanagara Kingdom Sanjaya kingdom Sunda kingdom Galuh kingdom Pajajaran Kingdom ancient Mataram kingdom Kalinga kingdom Sriwijaya kingdom Dharmasraya Kingdom Sailendra Kingdom Medang Kingdom kingdom of Kediri Singosari Kingdom Mataram kingdom Majapahit kingdom first in Indonesia namely SalakaNegara 100 BC and until the 16th century AD when Majapahit collapsed. At that time India was ruled by an Islamic empire. and it is so immoral that today's Indians claim that Southeast Asia became Hindu-Buddhist because of the efforts of Indian royalty. it's very arrogant and looks very fool because they don't study real history, f sake dude! From f where hey! Indian hello????
Indians today can only claim that Southeast Asia has a lot of Hindu-Buddhist teachings and culture and language similar to India and they are proud of that, but now they even curse Indonesians just because they are Muslims, even though Indonesia used to spread Indian religion and culture in south east Asia. OMG India India India
Hello never did so called islamic invaders vontrolled all og India for once in history during 1700 too there was Vijayanagara empire see n research n for fuck sake also research how 3rd grade converts of indonesia was sent to goa who did genocide of Hindus offcourse the pure dharmic ways was spread propagated by Hindus by the liking of both locals n royals... Truth alone triumphs time will tell n give answer for everything
@5:52 . Buddhism suffered from Islamic Invasions of country. Islamic oppression were brutal and wanted to convert entire country to Islam. To ensure Hinduism survived , Bhakti movement was initiated . That's why Hinduism survived in large nos. Sanatan Dharma is all encompassing Dharma. Hindu ,Buddhs ,Sikhs ,Jains are all part of it. Buddhism was only dominant for certain timeperiods. Not all times
Now I have become an atheist. If I fall into hell, I will rise up and lead a revolution to overthrow hell and establish a new state that serves and educates for the benefit of the people. If I go to heaven, I will lead my fellow angels to demonstrate about the issue of humanity and creatures. What kind of regime is up there or down there? It could be feudal, capitalist, communist, dictatorial, democratic, multi-party, one-party or constitutional government. Problem 3 worlds: Hell, Earth, Heaven, why don't they cooperate in inventing advanced military weapons to invade distant planets? 😅
Brother see the map of gurjar pratiharas ..that is enough ... actually it's not his fault central board history is north Indian history only. Greater bengal region was ruled by palas(then senas).... While studying Indian history you may have studied the term called kannauj triangle.
@@gold-toponym tai ka dai and Austroasiatic might be true but not sinitic (Chinese). Done my blood test, at least i have both except sinitic or Dravidian
The fact that java are actually more austroasiatic than austronesian brings interesting discussions of Java ancient connection with Khmer kingdoms. Jayavarman was supposedly in Java before going back. Its also incorrect to say if the malay peninsula was through commerce and not agriculture. Particularly states in Java, were agriculture based. Also malay is not a race. There are no malay in Sulawesi nor central borneo.
Please refer to my comment in this section as I clarify such things, and the connection between Khmer and Java, seen in the Kaladi and Sambor Prei Kuk temple inscriptions! Genetics prove that the majority ethnicities of Southeast Asia are largely Austroasiatic descent and are assimilated by various Austronesian, Tai Kadai, and Sino-Burman groups, that's why most groups look similar, and some people look exactly the same despite being from different countries! Javanese and all austroasiatics and other related SEA races were rice-based, and focused on agriculture, Han Chinese were originally wheat based before their expansions south! The reason Java and Melayu Peninsular areas are more Austroasiatic is most likely due to the conflict between Austronesians, and also because the land was already prosperous and very populated, and agriculture-based, having rice as sustenance, and after the Sundaland shelf sank, most either went North and South! The ones that were separated were probably Khmer-Mon-Cham, and then you have the Javanese, Sundanese, Balinese whom went and stayed south in modern day Java! This is probably an ancient connection and why Javanese and Khmer are mysteriously so very related, yet different and have a mysteriously similar and distinct culture! The word "Lor" in the temple name Candi Plason "Lor" means "Northern" as khmer it means "Upper, northern, top"!
Jadi sudah tahu kan sapa yang "MELAYU" yang sebenar???? Jadi rupanya orang jawa yang kalah perang hingga lari ke pulau??? Maknanya mereka kalah perang dengan Sukhotai??? Atau dengan bangsa Viet.... Hurm interesting.
@@nutzhazel Logika nya jangan Di balik Justru orang orang pulau (dahulu semua disebut orang Jawa) yang datang ke semenanjung untuk perang melawan orang Mon Khmer Viet Di tahun 775 - 1350. Sejak tahun 1351, orang orang pulau di semenanjung kalah oleh Siam, Portuguese, belanda, British. British lah yang sebut keturunan orang orang pulau ini sebagai orang "melayu" yaitu saat census British tahun 1911.
One remark that I would like to mention is that Ajanta and Ellora caves are not Buddhist. They were used by Buddishts but originally they were built buy Ancient Hindu civilizations and were places for great Hindu minds to think, meditate and invent.
*_Masa Hindu-Budha di Indonésia paling maju pada masanya, terbukti dengan ditemukannya banyak bangunan Megah peribadahan seperti Candi BOROBUDUR, Candi PRAMBANAN, Candi SÉWU, Candi PLAOSAN, Candi MUARA TAKUS, dll..._* *_Angkor Wat saja yang bangun oléh campur tangan Keraja'an dari Jawa. Dan sebelum Angkor Wat dibangun, di Jawa sudah banyak berdiri Candi2 megah!!!_* *_Tapi di vidéo ini tidak dibahas!!!_*
@@indiafirst3676 You misunderstand and no proof Indus Valley followed Hinduism that started in the Veda period. Hindus love to make shit up. Also islam never started with muhammed. Islam started with Adam meaning submission to god. The Kaaba was built before Abraham’s time with ishmeal around 4000 bc
@@supremercommonder Indus Valley Civilization practiced Nature Worship which later became a part of Indic Religions. Just see the Pashupati Seal excavated from IVC. And Adam being Muslim has no proofs its just a mythology. Infact Christianity & Judaism doesn't regard Muhammad as a Prophet or Islam as a religion. On top of that Majority of Early Prophets of the Abrahamic Religions were Jews like Moses and Jesus. Adam itself is a Westernised Name not even an Islamic Name to start with. I have never seen any Muslim with name Adam till date. Saw many Israelis ir British People with that name though
@@indiafirst3676 don’t matter what christans regard. they them selves are a paganised Judaism. It was corrupted with Roman paganism and Celtic paganism mixed with Judaism who the prophet Jesus never taught that he is god. They have no scripture to back up there church claim same with Hinduism. What does Islam mean Islam mean one who worships and submits his will to the one god. This is what was down by Adam himself. Yh proto nature worship is just sharmanic relgion. Show me manuscripts connecting dhama and Indus Valley. Even in the Old Testament it predicts the prophet muhammed it specifically talks about arabia and mount paran it talks about a prophet who will come to the children of kedar second son of ishmeal who the prophet decenda from. Even in the torah the story of ishmeal is there. We do the same ritual of Hagar and ishmeal and Abraham did over 6000 years ago. Abraham was not a Jew or a christan rather he was a Muslim who submitted his will to god. Same with adam and all relgion. Even dharma in it origins is monotheistic but changed over time with man. Even in Africa they found the oldest practise of relgion is monotheistic. religions that predate hunter gathers of India. In Islam Allah sent 124,000 prophets to mankind from Adam to every nation all the way until prophet muhammed the last messenger. All prophets taught the same thing.
The scars of islamic jihad ( genocide of hindus ) by mughals and turkic sultnate can still be seen on indian society . The mentality of pakistan and Indian sub continent muslim can be drived from these empires .
@@mohammadnoor9697 what’s the point of the prime minister speaks of the South Indian culture when half his people don’t even know the history of the south. The centre has time and again proved their bias that the nations history is built by the north and the contributions of the south is little to none. When the south voices their opinions we are suppressed but the money that we provide is accepted desperately with open arms.
@@sml4813 half the people don't know about Indian history at all, be it south or north. Even those who are educated know only of the three mauryas and three Gupta emperor, rest non. Who is nagabhata? Who is Rana sanga? Who is ajatshatru? Who is bimbisara? Who puspamitra? Northies don't know their own kings, and i dare say that's also the condition of south, tho to a lesser degree. The only exception are for some goddamn reason the Mughals. We don't know our own emperors, but know the entire bloodline of a bunch of savage turks
@@sml4813 Half their Indian dont know their own history, let alone south. We all know Muslim history. Thats all thats taught to us. You can thank the first five education ministers who were Muslims and left institutions.
India was not the first civilisation nor Hinduism the first religion - they were older religions and even Zoroastrianism is considered older by records while civilisations have all be recorded to be in the Middle East first.
@@anixes look again. Zoroastrianism came before both in terms of written records and also orally as it is a successor to another religion Tho animist may also contend with that.
@@kuchbhi2638 Zoroastrianism still exist and wasn’t exactly destroyed by Islam. It was already declining among their client states who became Christian’s and constant invasions by Persian or religious prosecution of non Zoroastrianism ultimately led to more internal and external issues causing the downfall of the regime. Took hundreds of years for most the citizenship to convert to Islam anyway.
Theravada Buddhists is not only followed in srilanka etc..its still followed in north east india..my people have been following theravada from time immemorial our people are called the tai khamtis (robbed of a history by the British)
Oh I've never met an Tai Khamti on the internet, greetings from South India. Can you tell me more about your people and modern say situation of your people?
@@bonemarrow3439 well the tai khamtis are predominantly concentrated in the indian district of Namsai in Arunachal Pradesh and spread in the nearby state of assam also our close kins were the Tai Ahoms of the Ahom dynasty... We also have a history with the brits ...in the name of sipoy mutiny 1857(we know it as one of the first struggle for independence from the colonial power in india...but there is no recognition of my people😞 ....we were known as vicious warriors and feared amongst the britishers ...... we are proud indians and patriotic to our core....and for tourism we have ..golden pagoda temple ,giant Buddha statue...and our festival is known as sangken similar to holi but without any colour ....just clean water to each other we also pray to buddha during the festival........in a nutshell😀
@@bonemarrow3439 as i know ...my people were considered to be a danger to the british as we put up strong resistance from the british divided my people into two part....to be weaker ...that is why my people are located in both assam and arunachal pradesh...and we failed during the war..and washed of history
@@chowrahulsimit1864 Yeah and also Chakma and Barua people of Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh practice Theravada Buddhism too. People always associate Vajrayana or Mahayana Buddhism with the form of Buddhism practiced in mainland South Asia (Nepal, India, Bhutan) but are unaware that Theravada Buddhism is also practiced by groups in northeastern South Asia (Northeast India, Bangladesh).
@@chowrahulsimit1864 that’s interesting, in Thailand we have Songkran, I think we get it from the Indian who spread all this Buddhism culture but can’t tell from where exactly, like we know India have Holy with color , but we just use water, I think you guy have the nearest name to us.
Khmer empire is the most underrated and the most powerful in the 12th century mostly over shadow, the ancient city of angkor is even bigger than modern day L.A and expert said that it is impossible to reconstruct Angkor wat than modern day l.a
Okay I really need to clear up some misinformation regarding Southeast Asia in many points, let's go: We start with the Austronesian expansion right away; as most academia focus most solely on the greatness of Austronesians in ways that others have been overlooked. So after the Australian Aborigines, Papuan Melanesian, and Negrito peoples, we have the *Austroasiatics*, whom set foot on the landmass of Sundaland indicated by early agricultural evidence provided that was even earlier than the determined Austronesian expansion (starting from Taiwan to Luzon and the Northern Philippines, before they started spreading to and from south, west, and east toward Polynesia), Austroasiatics were among the earliest, along with Hoabinhians to be in Sundaland and settle before the seas rose and completely isolated the maritime and mainland parts of Southeast Asia. Genetics also prove this, with Javanese, Balinese, Sundanese, Peninsular Malay, peoples of Sumatra and Borneo having at least 20% of Austroasiatic ancestry, up to 50-60% for Javanese, Peninsular Malay, Cham, Balinese, and Sundanese peoples; people often liken their appearance to the mainland (Cambodia / Khmer). Austroasiatics diversified quickly due to millenia of isolation but retained cultural similarities and an influx of syncretized Indian / South Asian cultures; nearly around that same time, Austronesians arrived causing conflict between groups in the former Sundaland area. THEN You have the Austronesian expansion, from Madagascar to Easter Island and perhaps the Americas and Japan. Both the Austroasiatic, Austronesian, and Tai-Kadai were ancestral rice cultivator farmers, the first in the world, spreading rice to (at least the eastern and southern parts of) India, and China (believe it or not); Han were wheat farmers, not rice. Malays and Cham are assimilated largely Austroasiatic peoples, especially Central Thai who look like Mon-Khmer peoples in Siam (Central Thailand). ----------------------------------------------- NOW, we have Funan, evidences and theories have suggested the Austroasiatics spread by water to populate sundaland, and the earliest excavations are from coastline areas of the ancient Mon and Khmer sites in Funan (the Mekong Delta now acquired by Vietnam), and Bangkok Chao Phraya area (now acquired by Thais // Assimilated Mon-Khmers. As any other place, why can't one ethnic group have more multiple competing kingdoms? **So, Chenla and Funan were both Khmer as Mon had Dvarawati, Thaton, and Haripunchai kingdoms.** and just like Malays had many kingdoms *(Ligor Negara Sri Dhammaraj, Langkasuka, Srivijaya)*, how come we can't say the same for Khmer and have double standards? This is a target point for nationalistic Thais and Vietnamese and Malays *(the latter thinking mainlanders are all Chinese)*. *FUNAN - is the Chinese interpretation of the word "Phnom" a word still used today in Khmer meaning mountain*, and has uses in Thai language, and is the first word of the Khmer capital city. There is a cultural continuity especially in the styles of the arts and temples of the Mekong Delta area (not just Vietnam but southern Cambodia) which reflects the succeeding Angkorian period temples all around the mainland! *Considering the ways the map is drawn, Funan included Austroasiatic minority and majority groups, including Cham, Mon, and Malay (they having listed this as their first kingdom), and they even see similarities between Kelantanese, Cham and Khmer, (genetically this is also proven despite nationalist claims).* ----------------------------------------- After the Angkorian era, influential Mons spread Theravada Buddhism that became the mainstream Khmer religion as it passed from Hinduised eras. Nowadays the former eras of the Khmer empire have biracial and assimilated Mons and Khmers mixed with Tai - Kadai (Lao, others) peoples, and Chinese till current. Khmer and Cham inscriptions call these people Syam, maybe related to Shan peoples, or it may be a reference to "stranger" or "dark skinned / clothed" peoples. (There is a province called Siam Reap). There is also a great relationship between Javanese and Khmer that we have forgotten about.
@@nettilee2696 yes, you will also see the syncretic Indianized and Austroasiatic culture in the temples and demeanor of ancient Javanese and Khmer, and the western / known ethnics of SEA! The gold Aristocratic Austroasiatic culture is synonymous and practiced in all Western SEA culture, and parts of Philippines in ancient / current times! Be Sure to check out Khmer, Javanese, Balinese, Malay, Sundanese Thai crowns, and observe the culture of dayaks and compare the culture to the sculptures on the Angkor temples. Indians called these areas "SuvarnaBhumi and Dvipa", for the exchange of spices, but also because the gold that was present in the high culture. And yes there is evidence for cultivated rice fields that have been dated earlier than the Austronesian expansion period in Java, but you have the earliest rice fields in Philippines Luzon near Taiwan (near Austronesian expansion point), dating back the Austronesian expansion area, which of course happened later, and they are older than the ones in Southern Philippines, proving this point. There is also no reason not to believe that Austroasiatics engaged in waterways, and most of all sailing, whether it was due to Austronesian contact or not, Tai kadai also sailed, as the rest of Southern Pre Han Chinese China did. The Munda of India arrived in India by shore almost weirdly, and they genetically cluster with Aslians (Check the video "Austroasiatic Waterworld" by Paul). This shows that Austroasiatics engaged in seafaring and was not exclusive to just Austronesians, though they have made great achievements as the greatest sailors prehistory.
The countries closest to china (vietnam, thailand, laos and burma) especially, but also the rest of SEA cant be compared to the past of how people MAYBE have looked like, do NOT have a “specific appeareance” a lot of my Thai family members look very diverse ( and here im not including my thai-chinese mixed family members). Many thais (friends , family and other ppl i know ,living in thailand) look very much east asian but still with brown skin (facial features), while some look more south asian ( like indian) or how people “expect” SEA to look like. Theres no such thing as a typical look, thais can look like anything around us (nearby countries). Most SEA i know look much like a mix between polynesians ans east asian (many filipinos nowadays are mixed with japanese) same as a LOT of southeast asians are mixed with chinese or indian ,vietnamese etc. You did mention that SEA is mixed with chinese , but the % is higher than ppl think, because only going by appeareance you dont always see it in every person, as the chinese % in one person can be low ,and the appeareance took more from the non chinese parts. I have several thai-chinese mixed cousins, 2 of them are brothers , one looks more like his mom (her family is originally only chinese, but in thailand as thai citizens with thai citienship ,since they are in thailand since countless generations already) and one more like his dad (who is thai ,but looks a bit more like a east/southeast asian mix). The brother who doesnt look like his chinese mom would mainly not be mistaken for chinese, as he does not have more typical east asian features, yet he is in fact HALFchinese, so he doesnt even have a low % chinese in him… appeareances can vary no matter how low or high the % is. Most ppl are not aware of having chinese roots, so ofcourse many would think its “not that many” in SEA who have some chinese in them. Ppl need to stop going by only looks. + Thai or lao arent specifically “originally” just from one place, especially the countries closest to china (again, thailand, vietnam, laos and burma region, no matter what these regions once belonged to, before they turned to a own country) are most likely asian mixed more or less from begin with, migration has been going on since the beginning of humanity… i highly doubt that they were ever 100% pure ethnic from any specific volk. And its actually even a debatte from scientists now, that the thai and lao etc are dna wise closest to chinese ,hence that the main origin of the “actual thais and lao” ppl originates in South china. Which is at least somewhat believable ,as our Thai language and lao are in the Tai-kadai language family SAME AS the zhuang dialect (a south chinese language) is also in the tai-kadai language family. The ZHUANG dialect is also where lao and thai language have theyr most chinese words from, hence why ppl do not get, that all tonal languages in SEA do highly come from china but all picked theyr influences from different chinese languages. Ofcpurse only compared to mandarin there isnt much similiarity. Cambodian is NOT a tonal language like chinese/thai/viet etc is , so ppl notice that even less with that language. Not all chinese languages are sino-tibetan. Tho ofcourse most ppl are not aware of that as they only know about cantonese and mandarin chinese mainly… Also , chinese, thai, vietnamese etc are NOT different races ,they are different ETHNICITIES. ASIAN is a Race, and all of them (thai, chinese and so on) ARE FROM the ASIAN Race.
@@mxd-1990asn Everyone knows that all East and Southeast Asians are from the same race. For the sake of breaking it down, for others to realize it more easily, we have to use "race" because ethnicity does not work between the different groups. There are genetic differences, albeit still close. We can say "sub-race" Race means division We can use the ethnolinguistic words, but people who do not study this like us here, would not know what "Austroasiatic, tai kadai" are. I will respond to the rest of your response later.
@@MadeInHistory I wish you could have included even at least a bit of Philippine history into this video. We are often overlooked and not mentioned at all... as if our history and culture only started when the Spaniards arrived... 😒😒😒 I recommend this lecture about Philippine history, at the Asia Society Museum. ua-cam.com/video/U_BjtFu7L38/v-deo.html I also recommend ("Transforming Manila: China, Islam and Spain in a Global Port City" - by Ethan Hawkley).
If you wanna see how important South Indian Tamil and Chinese cultures are in Southeast Asia, look at Thailand today. Thailand is the best place that mixes both cultures well to create Thai elements, which is now the beacon of Southeast Asia 🇹🇭😌
@@avinavpal1403HM NO, thailand is influenced by SEVERAL countries, not just one. India is part of, but so is China too and partly cambodia (even tho the cambodian parts that influenced thailand came from india in the first place too,…but since theyre more of theyr own now, i count it in). Actually NO country in SEA is influenced by only one nearby country. Buddhism would be one from india that most SEA shares + china that is for a good %also buddhist ,even tho its not the majority here but at least on the higher % ( i come from a Thai + chinese mixed family in thailand). The nearest SEA countries to china arent Tonal languages out of nowhere (thai and lao were once closer to sino-tibetan language and mixed up with old sanskrit words later on through the indian monks that came to india, while cambodian is NOT a tonal language at all). Thai and lao were mainly influenced by SOUTH Chinese dialects, hence why a lot of ppl who are at least familiar woth mandarin and cantonese do not see much similarity there. While in fact not even all chinese lnguages are sino-tibetan. Thai and lao have most similarity with the Zhuang dialect (south chinese dialect) which is actually part of the tai-kadai languages , SAME AS Thai and Lao. Some loanwords came from other south and southwest dialects of china. The numbers in zhuang and thai/lao are 90% the same with only very slight differences in tonals. Many words in thai, lao vs zhuang are similar too. All in all Vietnam ,thailand and burma are still highly chinese influenced too beside of the indian influence that is also high. A LOT of our food is either actually completely from china but simply slightly changed sometimes by recipe in thailand, or its a mix of thai and some chinese influence. The thai language how it is NOW ,contains mostly southern chinese and sanskrit loanwords than anything else.
@Karjo Adiyanto But it's nothing compared to how caste system works in India. Caste system in Bali is pretty much limited to culture and religion for rather conservative Balinese. I have many Balinese friends who don't give a damn about their caste, and marry whoever they want, even with person from other ethnic group with different religion. The same thing will be a big deal and be frown upon by society in India. Often causes tragic consequences like honor killing
Srivijaya kingdom and Majapahit kingdom the two biggest kingdom empire Hindu-Buddha in south east Asia. Indonesia have "Borobudur" the biggest Buddhis temple in the world. In ancient Times, (Indonesia🇮🇩, Malaysia🇲🇾, temasik/Singapura🇸🇬, Brunai🇧🇳) = "Nusantara" were united kingdom the Majapahit empire by the Patih gadjah Madha
Great explanation man , Indians were literally the first and most educated civilizations ever , Our Greatest Kingdoms , our culture , Our ultra legendary history and First educational institutions , deep emphasis and even discovery of many subjects are from India🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳
Your not the first, it's the mesopotamian Babylonian civilization in the middle east next is Africa next is India and then the minoan civilization all of them are just as great
@@JMB_focus hope you know messoppotonians traded witg indus valley civilization in india?.. means they were contomperory civilizations egyptians were also contemporary to indus valley civilizations... chinese beacame a civilization later... greeks followed, rome, etc etc
fun fact: the buddism and hinduism in java Indonesia were slightly different because they had been assimilated with javanese culture, and that characterustic counted for Islam as well. ps: - javanese culture was closer to madagascar and contrast to australia-newguenia like how contrast madagascar culture to africa -java rice (oriza javanica) was closer ro japanese rice (oriza japonica) and differ from thailand rice or indian brasmati although in javanese it called beras close to brasmati
Well we call rice as "Bai" in Khmer-- doesn't have anything to do with basmati, crops archaeological history proves that rice was first domesticated by Southeast Asians in southern China before Han expansion. SEA are: Austroasiatic, then Austronesian, Tai Kadai, and Sino-Burman. We spread rice to Chinese and Indians!
@@gold-toponym yeah, but what i mean rice in india to thailand is simillar type of rice, but rice in jawa is simillar to japanese rice. although in history, Indonesia (sriwijaya and majapahit) had connection to india, and had no connectin with japan before japanese expantion, at least that what written in history. and i think there is missing link some where
@@mnhusin509Japanese trade with Southeast Asia. I’m sure they got a bunch of different species of rice from Southeast Asian kingdoms. Brought it back to Japan and find out that the fat short rice grows well in that climate. Nature will answer your question.
@@Handle_Edit maybe, there is no note of japanese interaction in ancient time at least in my history textbook, the only interaction recorded was when japan invade asia in 1940s. and there is 2 variety of javanese rice that so similar to japanese the regular rice prettty similar and also, in java there is a rice variety called "ketan bintik" literally mean "dot shape sticky rice" but now a day only few cultivate it because low harvest yield, but i think it very simillar to japanese short grain rice or mochi rice
Khushans don't interest me it's too recent wrt bharats history. Many sites excavated in recent times pushes India's timelines beyond western beliefs EG nubra valley , the sunken city of Dwarka. South Indian records show of the debt Rome was in to these south Indian port cities that many times they gave white women to the Hindu kings as part payment bec Rome desired all that was Indian yet couldn't pay back for their hunger.
The Kitub Minaar qas a Hindu structure. the place of Sufis i9s important. cast did not disappear when a Hindu converted, Dalits still remained Dalits. The land given to the Sikhs was by Akbar. ALSO: Sikhs saw themselves as protectors of Dharma and all Dharmic religions.
Ayutthaya is Ayodhya in the Ramayana of ancient India. Thai kings were often named Rama. Even today the Thai royal courts use Sanskrit and Brahmin priests for Vedic pujas. Ganesha and Vishnu are lively in Thai culture and language. The churning of the ocean of milk, samudra-manthan in the Mahabharat meaning history of the Great India is prominently displayed in Bangkok's Suvarnabhumi Airport which in and of itself is based upon Vedic Puranic legends of South East Asia.
Wangsa Sailendra or Syailendra (Śailendramśa) is the name of the dynasty or dynasty of kings who ruled in Mdaŋ (Medang Kingdom or Ancient Mataram Kingdom), in Central Java since 752 and ruled Sriwijaya, on the island of Sumatra since the leadership of Balaputradewa Putra from Central Java. Most of its kings were adherents and protectors of Mahayana Buddhism. However, according to the Sojomerto inscription, Dapunta Sailendra, who became the ancestor of the Sailendra dynasty, was a Hindu of the Siwa sect. From Central Java, and the Sailendra dynasty is thought to have originated from the Kalingga Kingdom in the 5th century in Central Java and has many relics of temples located on the Kedu plains, Central Java. Besides originating from Central Java, other areas such as Sumatra or even India and Cambodia, was once proposed as the origin of this dynasty, but there are no sideboards or inscriptions to support it. Borobudur temple was built in 740 AD when the Syailendra dynasty was located in the ancient Medang or Mataram kingdom on the island of Java which ruled Java, Sumatra, the peninsula of Malaysia and Cambodia, but one of the kings who was placed in the power of the Syailendra kingdom, namely Jayavarman in Cambodia, betrayed the head of the royal family in Java and founded the Khmer empire in Cambodia in India it is written on the Nalanda inscription in the 9th century "We were asked by the illustrious Maharaja Balaputradewa, king Suwarnadwipa through a courier arranged by me to build a monastery at Nalanda which this decree granted to dedicate to the blessed Buddha, the abode of all the great virtues such as the Prajnaparamita, for worship, offerings, knowledge , shelter, alms, bed, the needs of the sick like medicine;....." the Nalanda inscription There is a kind-hearted king who comes from Suwarnadwipa(Sumatra) named Balaputradewa from the Syailendra dynasty who is a Buddhist descendant of Wiravairimathana.
@@Deccan-pride aryan my ass.. there is no such thing.. we are all dravidian in India. Expect maybe some central asians in Afghanistan and western pakistan and tibetoburman in north east
The South Chinese language (dialect) “ZHUANG” is actually ALSO a Tai-Kadai language , SAME AS Thai and lao. Not all chinese languages are sino-tibetan.
Mahayana Buddhism was not only spread to east asia. It was actually spread eastward to southeast asia, especially to the indonesian archipelago. It was the most popular branch of Buddhism in ancient kingdoms such as sriwijaya and mataram (java). Borobudur was a reminder of this era. Ancient Javanese also produced some buddhist text that is still have its influence on Balinese hinduism, such as "Sang Hyang Kamahayanikan". In Java, buddhism later mixed with Shaivism and formed a siwa-buddha sect during the middle ages. This sincretism would later be evolved into (or at least influence) what is now Balinese hinduism.
As a Cambodian, I can say that you butcher all pronunciation of the khmer word except the word Cambodia. But still, I really appreciated the effort you put in for this type of video, as the internet mostly only show north american, and european history. This type of video really show other perspective of the entire human history. I only learn today, that at ours peak, we are stronger than the Byzantine Empire. 32:20 Jayavarman actually pronoun "Jei-var-ra-mant" by us local here
NOBODY outside of Cambodia speaks Khmer, nor are they expected to. & if Jayavarman is romanised as Sanskrit/ Pali, that's how it's going to be pronounced in English. Nobody even says Suvarnabhumi Airport like how the Thais pronounce it, & that word is used in modern everyday life by non-Thais.
@@JumpoableSouth Vietnam speak Khmer because those Khmer are the first indigenous people during the first Khmer Phnom Kingdom (Funan) of Cambodia and other Khmer people still living in Surin, Buriram, Korat plateau in Thailand still speak Khmer. Those Khmer are Khmer people outside of Cambodia speaking Khmer. Thai were Tai people from South China running from the Mongols invasion their mother land Nanchao, China. The Khmer King Jayavarman VIII allowed Tai refugees to live in the Khmer province Sukhotei. Later, a Chinese Uthong from China with the help of Ming and the Tai refugees betrayal of Khmer, they were able to invade Khmer province Sukhotei. Uthong declared himself as a God King in the traditional of Khmer God King and declared independence from Khmer in 1350. In 1767, the Burmese army came to destroy Ayutthaya and another Chinese Taksin from China with the help of the Chinese Qing, he was able to restore Ayutthaya and Taksin declared himself as God King in the Khmer tradition God King. His Chinese clan buried him in his home town in Guangdong China. Without the Khmer and the Chinese, Thailand could’t be existed today. Ram Kamheing a Khmer-Tai bilingual created Tai alphabet from the Khmer language and Khmer number. Khmer number has been written on all Thai currency today. ua-cam.com/video/M-T9q-mBdqk/v-deo.html
Khmer King Kaudinya Jayavarman I was an Indian Prince Kumeru from South India married to the native Khmer Queen Soma Devi (Princess Nagi of Kokthlok) and they founded the first Khmer Phnom Kingdom (Funan) in the first century. Khmer King Kampu Swayambhuva was an Indian -Persian from North Indian married to the native Khmer Queen Mera Devi (Great great grand daughter of King Kaudinya and Queen Soma of Phnom (Funan) in the third century, they founded the second Khmer Kingdom of Kampuchea (Cambodia-Chenla). Thai were Tai native from Southern China Nanchao, the birthplace of Tai native spoken language. Tai people took refugees during the Mongols invasion their motherland Nanchao, China and the Khmer King Jayavarman VIII allowed them to live in the Khmer province Sukhotei. Ram Kamheing was a Khmer-Tai bilingual created Tai alphabet from the Khmer alphabet and Khmer number so they can write to communicate with Khmer people. Khmer number are written on all Thai currency today. Later, a Chinese Uthong from China with the help of Tai refugees betrayal of Khmer and with the help of the Chinese Ming from China, they were able to invade Khmer province Sukhotei. Uthong declared himself a God King of Siam in the traditional Khmer God King and declared independence from Khmer in 1350. In 1767, the Burmese came to burn and destroy Ayutthaya, another Chinese Taksin from China with the help of the Chinese Ming, he was able to kick the Burmese out of Ayutthaya. A Chinese Taksin again declared himself as a God King of Lop Borei in the traditional Khmer God King. Without the Khmer and the Chinese, Thailand could’t be existed today. Chinese Taksin Siam-Tai King tomb in China ua-cam.com/video/M-T9q-mBdqk/v-deo.html
I am Cambodian historian, It is sad that Cambodians are taught and misinformed about our great legendary Hinduism. Khmer Empire would not have existed without Hinduism God Kings. The major shift from Hinduism to Buddhism that marked the end of Khmer Empire. 90% of Cambodian are now Buddhis and have forgottened our great ancestors glory days. Cambodians are taught that the four faces are either King Jayavarman VII or Buddha's. The government have to do with wrong teaching, or they just don't understand Hindu. The four faces are belong to lord Brahma, one of the major Hindu deities.
problems 1 need a clarification on Afghanistan. is it part of subcontinent or not 2 the Delhi Sultanate was not a single entity, it is a collective name for many dynasty.
No Afghanistan is not part of Indian sub continent . But since 5000 years it is heavily influenced by Indian civilization . Even today most afghani play indian style cricket , know hindi , urdu and watch indian drama and movies . Afghanistan was under indian control during mahabharta , mahajanpad , Moryan , Kushan , Gupta , Hindu shahi dynasties . After that turks cobtrolled afghanistan
Indonesia is the center of Nusantara, Indonesia is the true descendants of Srivijaya and Majapahit not malay, stop saying Indonesia is malay. The existing history textbook is made by western, for their purposes.
You guys are MALAY. Malay is not just an ethnic. It was a RACE. If you kept this narrow-minded thinking you're going nowhere. The colonials were right when they called this area "MALAY ARCHIPELAGO".Dont confuse Malay with ethnic Malay that were natives throughout S.E.A and Malaysia. All Austronesian ethnic can be considered as MALAY. We were fortunate that our country solved this confusion since independence. Although the same cannot be said about your country, and with the way you guys think, you're going nowhere. You guys rather be associated with Indians rather than your own race. Which is funny. 🤣.
@@JayAnuar Well well from your comment I can guess that you're Malaysian. A country that is overproud that everything should base on Islam, thinks that they're the most Islam, n of course so over proud of malay that even thinks they're the most malay... Lol. And you're so proud that have been fooled by your kerajaan lol. Cause why not, the one who makes and uses malay race is only westerner.. n your country is so proud of the western country, cause they give you independence. But, from history.. the malay word is used cause malacca is so afraid of the domination of Thai culture in the north and Javanese culture in the south. N westerner uses malay to describe all regions cause they're too lazy to search for the differences. They just are like, "they are all not too tall, have brownish skin, n I believe every island speaks the same language as this place, they all must be malay." It's just cause they're too lazy lol. It's the same with Arab people calling the person in the Indonesian archipelago bani jawi. Cause the Javanese were maybe the first people from this archipelago that have contact with the Arab world. So they think everyone from this archipelago is Javanese/Jawa/jawi. But if you called everyone in this archipelago a jawi race right now, just because the Arabs think that everyone is jawa, no one will accept it lol. It's the same concept. To foreigners the first people they meet, that's the identities of the region. And the one who came to this archipelago and became the ancestors of every ethnicity is MALAYO not malay. Even malay was born from MALAYO. If you call malayo as malay it's the same case that you call a mongoloids as mongol. So every Asian is a Mongolian. Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and SEA all of them are Mongolian. Mongol is so great huh? The only and most suitable term for us is AUSTRONESIAN.. the people of the sea. There's nothing like malay race, only the AUSTRONESIAN race. But I believe it's so hard to accept the reality right.. after all, you have been fooled by your kerajaan from the independence day right .
Malaysia never claim Indonesia as Malay. Everyone agree Indonesia is Javanese, Sundanese and then Malay. The reason Malay are so spread out in Indonesia from Sumatra, Java, Borneo and Sulawesi because Malay are descendents of foreign traders.
Curiously, just because of different religions, cultures, languages, the whole Indonesian Philippines does not want to be called the malayan Mongoloid😆. But they have the same physical characteristics. Only different cultures, languages, and religions. From their physical form, they match the exact race of austronesia /malayan mongoloid.
Theravada didn't favour the rich, acts of great material generosity was easily noted down in history. Everybody can become a monk,in Sri lanka prior to the advent of the Thai and Burmese monk order monks talked against the caste system but when Buddhism died out in Sri Lanka and was revived with Thai and Burmese monks they introduced the caste division and banning women to become Buddhist nuns.
They are crazy with Khom. Khom is not Khmer 😆 Khom is Siames Siames build Angkor Not Khmer Khmer was a slavery of Khom. The people of Southern Chinese wanted to be 5000 years history. They don't recognise themselves as a Southern Chinese.
@@champaputih4568ad story.. why don't come and take your Angkor wat 🤣🤣 can't right? Why UNESCO or ICJ can't help ? Cause of fake.. go prove it I waiting. if you can't then keep spam 👇 youtube.com/@UNESCO 👇 youtube.com/@unitednations Do it if you dare..
@@champaputih4568 the funny thing is we found the 4-5,000 years of evidence of Tai people in Thailand, like the paintings in the cave, the ancient drums (2,000 years old)from Tai people, this kind of painting and ancient drum also found in south China, that mean there were Tai people that had already migrated in this area for a long time before the Tamil Indian came to mix with the local people and built up the kingdom. About Khom, it’s the truth that the early Ayutthaya Kingdom are Khom people or you want to call it ancient Khmer or whatever, who fought and took back what it’s belong to their royal family, they have to revenge the rebel sweet melon, who was Cham, who are the ancestor of now Khmer. Sweet melon killed all the upper class and royal people. So Ayutthaya kingdom that was found by Supannaphum(Tai) and Lavo(Khom), as the Chinese call this kingdom as Siamlovo in their book, they have to revenged and took the town back, they also took all the people back to Ayutthaya, so what were left in Khmer land were actually mostly Cham people, not the Khom(or ancient Khmer or whatever you like to call) If you want to learn history you have to put down the crazy about nationality. There was no Thailand or Cambodia at that time. The war at that time was not a war between the Tai and Khmer but the war between the Varman royal family vs the rebel Cham. The Chinese who came at that time also wrote the book telling that the upper class and labor class were totally different people. There were many labor class people and few upper class people. (In my opinion the royal keep using the labor class people to built the big palaces too much to the point that they were upset and finally fought back.) Btw I heard that in Cambodia they teach you in school that Sweet melon killed the previous Varman king and then become the king but didn’t mention that he was the rebel right? Do you think it make sense that someone who killed the king didn’t get punish by execution but became the king instead? How is that possible? The possibility is only he was the boss of rebel. And from then on there was no Varman in the king’s name anymore because they are not the same royal family who built the Angkor empire. Most of history now was written by the western or French in the past who want to claim the land of Thailand as they already colonized Cambodia in the past. Like if Khmer create Siam then we could also colonize Siam same as Cambodia. Before even Daravadi coin that found in Thailand, the French said it’s from Khmer🤣 and then they changed it because too many evident showed how BS was that, now they said it belong to Mon. They avoid at all cost to mention the Tai. Thai are Tai+Mon/Khom, by culture and by DNA of people from central and south of Thailand. The Tai have more influence because later on in Ayutthaya Era, the prince from Tai become king, the king had 4 main wife that came from different royal family like Lavo, Suphannaphum, Sukhothai, Later on the prince from the Supannaphum(Tai )wife became a king. So after that Tai culture had more influence and mix with the Mon/Khom.
@@vassanab4243 The real migration of Tai to Southeast Asia was from over 1000 years ago😁. 4500 years ago you meant the Ban Chiang, 😁 Thai historians claimed Ban Chiang belong to Austroasiatic people not the Tais. Khom is a big joke of Thailand 😆. When the whole world knows only Chia or India But the Thai tried to tell the whole world Jek or Khaek. 😆 Soryy We don't know KrungThep we only Know Bangkok. In Khmer history there's no a king name sweet Melon. That's a big joke. Khmer chronicle history was full of myth. Sweet Melon the Western history could not find the real or reasonable. The Sweet Melon was belong to Burmanese origin. Thai extremist Nationalism wants to build up their own history for the Thai when the whole world knows Thai or Siamese was freed from Khmer. Sorry We need the real history not the imagination of the Chompon.
जाति और caste बहुत बहुत अलग है। आज के समय हम caste को नहीं चाहते बल्कि यह चाहते है कि फिर से जाति वर्ण व्यवस्था आ जाए। जाति कुल वर्ण व्यवस्था एक उन्नत समाज का प्रतीक है।
Indian caste system ka decline economic decline ki vajah se tha. Or Economic decline invasion or exploitation ki vajah se tha. India m kabhi slave revolution nhi hua. Kyunki so called lower caste or labour class ka exploitation nhi hua. Unke exploitation islamic Invasions or British colonisation ka sbse bada hath hai. Or waha se Jaati system turned into opressive system. Even women started getting exploited.
Lots of misinformation on Buddhism. Theravada does not favor the rich. In order to attain nirvana in theravada you must be a monk and give up all your wealth, titles and disown yourself from your family.
You fail to mention that Kanishkar was a great patron of Buddhist and Hindu art, the Ayurveda and other Hindu developments. The caves were both Hindu and Buddhist and they developed on each other. Angkor Wat was also built by the South Indian Kings, who were responsible for the spread of Hindu Culture to Malaysia.
Hmm... He is the founder of mleccha caste system... Very discriminative... Especially for Javanese and Sundanese (Java), Saka (Aji Saka/Ajivaka, Javanese and Sundanese's ancestor), Malaya (Melayu/Malay), and Kamboja-Champa ethnicities... That's why we refused our ancestor to categorized as Hindu (Indian Hinduism)... The term Shiva-Buddhist religion, or Shiva religion, or Kapitayan/Aji Saka/Ajivaka religion is more neutral...
I am thankful for bringing India and south east Asian history. Most channels focus only on China and Japan when history of India is very unique and influenced places from Afghanistan to Japan. India also indirectly affected the history of the Americas as the Europeans were originally searching for sea routes to India.
for such a short video trying to cover very dense and wide range of topic, this vido are a good general overview. Ofcourse the claims that are appear here some are debatable, so watch these kind of video with grain of salt and read more if you want to have a better undersatanding of history. anyaway, great content
Maybe that's for Indian. For Indonesian (especially Javanese and Sundanese), we have raja-resi/begawan or senapati ing alaga panatagama concept. Raja/king also act as panatagama/religious leader. This system adopted by Mataram Islam Sultanate (the largest Islamic empire in Southeast Asia) till today...
Very nice instructions, lots of information, thank you very much. Want to know a lot about India. Very beautiful and full of motherhood ,very close country to all of us, our India. Mother of all. Thanks again.Stay well.
wow how comfortably you have omitted the Pala and Sena dynasties of Bengal, and the Bengal Sultanate that had defeated delhi on numerous occassions … some of the biggest ever in South Asia
CORRECTION: \THE Arab/Muslim TRADE IN India WAS RELATIVELY PEACEFUL. 'THE vicious, barbaric Islamic invasions were not Arab, they were Turkic, Uzbek, Afghan. ALSO: Genghis Khan never invaded India, He could, but did not. there is much speculation why, one of the most prominent being that India was the holy land and he was Buddhist. \the primary reasons for the ghazni and other Islamic invasion was to plunder and loot mostly the temples. Your account is far too sketchy....
What nonsense .... delhi sultanate had it's empire mostly in north-india as delhi it's capital that's why it's called delhi sultanate but that doesn't mean other empires didn't exits. In south vijayanagara, last of cholas empires, in east kalinga, in north eastern ahom dynasty ruled predominantly. The only moslim ruler who ruled 90% of indian subcontinent was tyrant aurangzeb untill subdued by maratha empire 1674-1818. The maratha empire was the last large hindu empire & mainly responsible for the fall of mughals.
Sorry but whoever told you that Theravada is was only reserved for a class was false…because the real teachings of Buddha is Theravada….not Mahayana…no one is restricted from Theravada ever….the Mahayana Buddhist monks at the start delve more with human affairs and more attached to material things and are therefore considered not really as strict as Theravada…just for real info purpose….not to stir any arguments….the 10 purities of monks are not followed by Mahayana monks as strictly as Theravada Monks…but enlightenment depends on one’s effort despite any titles of which branch of religion we are in…
after all, the bramana theory is full of paradoxes which say that it was Indians who brought Dharma teachings to Indonesia, Indians are people who really avoid the sea, let alone a brahmana, a brahmana can't go to faraway places right? look at the eoic Ramayana there it is said that when Srirama wanted to go to Alenka (Sirlangka) instead he used a ship but he built a bridge! and the culture of Indians is a culture not of people who like to go to sea, especially when they sail to faraway places like Indonesia, that's a stupid theory! different from the Indonesian Malays they are great seafarers who have been proven! look at the people of Madagascar they are descendants of Indonesian sailors. I think what makes the most sense is that the ancient Indonesian Malays first sailed to India and studied Dharma teachings in India after that they established kingdoms with Hindu-Buddhist motifs.
There are Three kind of people in the world Hebrews Gentiles and Palistinians. Israel and Pilipino are the Hebrew through Eber have 2 son Peleg and Joktan where the Israel and Pilipino came from
Harrapan/bacterian is more Sumerian/Iranian in heritage than indian. Just like the horse that was introduced to india, so as well other cultures. Vedic hymns are technically Babylonian (the way they are structured) in nature.
@@indiafirst3676 Pashupati seal looks Elamite…meaning trade or trade center created certain civilizations. IVC is more related to zargos mountain and Persian cultures compare to southern india. There was no india at that time, and Oxus is much further away from sumeria than harrapan culture, meaning cultures from sumeria went as far to the Oxus river. So most likely it influenced the IVC. One theory is gypsies-indo-European-Canaanites a one in the same.
@@itsvan5791 To my knowledge muslim are most against atheism. So , not surprised that it is incorporated into the muslim communist doctrine. Besides, China's ccp has full authoritarian control for over half a century and wary on religion stealing away their influences on the mass.
masa hindu budha , indonesai sangat maju unggul terkenal diseluruh dunia terbukti dengan borobudur dan prambanan .
Kemudian negara api menyerang
@@parhutahian yg dimaksud negara api itu penjajah Belanda atau pedagang muslim?
@@lbnomad4042 Cabang ekstrim agama Ibrahim sangat fanatik dan tidak memberikan kontribusi apa pun kepada umat manusia, hanya tahu cara menyedot minyak dan menjualnya, serta dalam sejarah dan zaman modern mengkhususkan diri pada penghancuran. 😅
Secara bersamaan kemudian Indonesia perlahan menjadi muslim karena peradangan dan anak benua india di invasi oleh kerajaan Islam
I am thankful for bringing India and south east Asian history. Most channels focus only on China and Japan when history of India is very unique and influenced places from Afghanistan to Japan. India also indirectly affected the history of the Americas as the Europeans were originally searching for sea routes to India.
Not necessary you guys be happy with fake greek history of catholic church. We know our history..
It's good to see a documentary on Indian culture and history and we should be thankful but that doesn't mean we should brag about the documentary on other cultures. China has a rich history and the fact that their culture was left untouched even when invaders invaded unlike India where many converted to foreign religions. Also most people that aren't into history are still more likely to be a weeb obsessed with Japanese culture hence for the views content creators usually make series on Japan.
@@indiangum4691 // their culture was left untouched //
Not really.
@@dsbdsb6637 dude they were invaded many times but the Chinese culture never fades. It was always there which is why they still have their own letters unlike vietnam who were told to use roman letters or in some cases they were not allowed to speak their own languages which is why many Africans speak French and Portuguese
@@indiangum4691 So an arbitary criteria to claim cultural superiority, lol.
There have been links between Odia traders (Sadhabas) and the South East Asian Regions like Cambodia, Bali, Java and Sumatra. Infact Kaudinya I, one of the kings of Cambodia was an Sadhaba merchant from Kalinga (present Odisha). In fact the rich maritime history and cultural connections exist to this day: Every year after Kartik Purnima, Bali Yatra takes place in Odisha in memory of the old maritime voyages to Bali. Also the name Ayuthya of the Thai kingdom comes from Ayodhya (present day Uttar Pradesh, and the capital of Lord Rama in Ramayana). Even today you can find symbols like Garuda in Indonesia (who is the holy mount of Lord Vishnu).
Yes! We have a legend for the meeting of Kaundinya and Queen Soma, and the first Hinduized polity kingdom of Southeast Asia, FUNAN, a genetically and archaeologically proven Khmer site (the artefacts of the Khmer style regardless of Thai and Vietnamese nationalist comments)!
You fail to mention that Kanishkar was a great patron of Buddhist and Hindu art, the Ayurveda and other Hindu developments. The caves were both Hindu and Buddhist and they developed on each other. Angkor Wat was also built by the South Indian Kings, who were responsible for the spread of Hindu Culture to Malaysia.
The stories about the cruelity and barbaric acts of the delhi sultanate and the Mughal empire are still very deeply arches in the minds of the people.
No bro, mughal and delhi sultanate is bringing peace and properity... Also driven out pagans from India
@@codenameeaglecooldown900 what shit? Pagan were real holders and will be always abrahamics were barbaric third class bastards.
People simping for monarchs based on identity are real suckers. All elites of all identities collaborated with all the rulers to maintain regional control. All rulers to various degrees left these people to themselves if they got taxes and consctipts.
Rulers, mughal or not depended on the casteist feudal structure of india to maintain their rule. Good riddance to kings and monarchies. Just wish we could Louis XVI some of them.
@@arjunravichandran7578 i don't think so. What about such big institutions like Nalanda and Takshashila and other great universities. Feudal structure came after the local native system was destroyed by invasions.
Great content! Filipino here. Visayas Island Group (Bisaya) from the Philippines most likely came from the Sri Vijaya kingdom as a tribute state. There’s even the well documented Raja Humabon (a Malay Raja) who is listed as the first Malay king baptized as a Christian. Bisaya language is also the closest to Bahasa Indonesian language in the Philippines. Mabuhay Ma-Phil-Indo.
Bisya (vijya) is what the local ati (natives) called the sri vijayan exiles who landed in Panay. Bisaya as a term was only used for the people of panay (kedatuan ti madjaas). The people of cebu on the other hand were chola. While panay was populated by sri vijayan exiles of pannai after sri vijaya fell to the invading chola, cebu on the other hand was founded by sri lumayana, a half sri vijayan/chola prince. He was ordered by the chola maharajah (his dad) to establish a military outpost near panay (the sri vijayans). Sri lumayana rebelled and established the kingdom of singhapala. Later on, cebu fell under the bisaya sphere of influence and their people started calling themselves bisaya. Although the paanish called them pintados
*Palembang not Malay,
Srivijaya is Palembang's empire, search the Palimbang town in Visayan region, that's where Srivijaya empire started their influence in Visayan region in general. The region named as _Palimbang_ because their ancestors came from Palembang in southeastern Sumatra (Indonesia).
Malay isnt a race.
@@Ix-.-xI Palembang are ethnically malay..they speak a palembang malay dialect
@@mofb8331 Palembang are ethnically Palembang, they speak Palembang language, Malays born from Palembang, and in fact Malay just a dialect of Palembang! stop twisting the history! English are born from German and in fact dialect of German, not the other way around!
Theravada only popular in Srilanka and Indochina. For Malay Peninsula, Sumatra and Java, Mahayana is popular.
i think in Indonesia and Malaysia, Theravada was adopted during the medieval era.. after Islam introduced to archipelago, and then colonialism began, Hindus and Buddhists declined.. and today both Indonesian and Malaysian are Mahayana because from Chinese diaspora..
Mahayana Buddhism has a very weak philosophy. That's why they don't last long and converted to islam
And Myanmar Cambodia and Thailand
Mahayana is a water down mix teaching of Theravada and ancient Greek / Hellenistc. They even brought statues carving to South Asia and Far East Asia. The same way how Hellenistc / Western Nomads brought horses to ancient China..
@@e_puji_r Its older than medieval era more like classical period. Ancient Cambodian were Buddhist and than converted to Hinduism afterward.
The earliest historical reference to Funan (Ancient Cambodia) is a Chinese description of a mission that visited the country in the third century A.D. Funan reached its zenith in the fifth century A.D.. Beginning in the early sixth century, civil wars and dynastic strife undermined Funan's stability, making it relatively easy prey to incursions by hostile neighbors. By the end of the seventh century, a northern neighbor, the kingdom of Chenla, had reduced Funan to a vassal state. [Library of Congress]
Kaladi inscription in Java 909 ce wrote :
People of ariya dravidia pandhya shinghala kling, Khmer Mon Cham, and hunjeman (Arab Farsi Rom merchants) are FOREIGNERS who must pay foreigners tax as workers or merchants in Java.
They not allowed to live in city or villages just in ports.
This inscription have many serial inscription until 1520 ce. 👍
Yep, in many scripture ancient Javanese social hierarchy in ancient java is a little bit different with other regions, the closer you are with wealth your social status will be lower, that's why you'll find some story about how a mere farmer or skilled blacksmith could have higher status in society than the most wealthiest merchant or even with some royal family (because in ancient java only descendant from the king allowed to build their own village.)
There is also exist some independent region made from alliance of many village (not a kingdom) that don't pay tax and even the king aren't allowed to bring soldiers inside the village.
Interesting!
Among of them there's a closest neighbor Khmer recorded in your inscription.
@@champaputih4568 khmer is probably closely related to javanese in ancient past.
in recent dna test it's found that javanese, sundanese and balinese is more than 50% austroasiatic, genetically we are more related to mainland south east asia than other maritime south east asian, but culturally we are maritime south east asia.
@@itsvan5791 merchant was also among the low status in ancient china, their logic was merchant didn't produce anything, while farmer produced food, and soldier defend the country.
it has nothing to do with wealth actually.
@@ahyarhartanto1802
Some specialists said the people of Southeast Asia was the centre of western trade since before the history era. They already had their own identities and civilizations before Indian Sphere. It might be possible that they between Austro-asiatic and Austronesian (who were martime travellers) related together or mixed at least 2000 BC. They had strongly relationship together. Even Though the Funan were possible some of them were Austronesians who came or lived in Cambodia.
I am from north India .
I own everything to gurjar pratihar , rashtrakutas and karkota .
These Indian empires saved India from islam upto 500 years .
India arab fought almost 20 wars but Indian empires won almost all wars except sindh .
The first successful invasion on mainland India occured on 12 00 AD .
Arab caliphate ended on the boundries of India otherwise whole north India would be islamic . The end of Most ancient civilization would happen .
Not north India but sindh in pakistan. Raja Dahir was the first hindu king to face the arab invasion in 7th century AD. He died during the battle and his daughters were taken as sex slaves to the arabic caliphate. Then there were kings in kashmir like lalitaditya muktapida who fought against the arabs. These kings are highly overlooked. The rest is known to most people- how rajputs fought against the arabic invasion. it was more like constant resistance that saved India from becoming Islamic. Rest of the civilisations like persia, mesopotamia succumbed to it.
Sindh is mainland India. There's a famous saying.
सिंध बिना हिंद नही
@@ashishtiwari1912no king dhair daughters along with their mother ( queen) did johar as per Wikipedia..
I think same is written in chahnama ( muslim record of that time )
first as a sundanese, you got the wrong maps for majapahit, cus Sundanese never fall to the hand of Majapahit.
and i love how you point out that women have equal positions in a lot of SEA culture, and that is true. even Hinduism can't change that until the abrahamic religions come especially Islam and Christian. Sometimes i feel like its actually a down fall for South East Asian when they adapt the abrahamic religions.
mabar kuy
In Hindu systems, women could be rulers no issue.
@@navinkumarpk86 there is also some muslim queen aka Sultanah, for me Hindu and Islam doesnt have really different when it comes to threating women as a second class citizen.
@@veerathesoulharvester1509 Abrahamic religions are and have always been the downfall of Southeast Asian culture. Especially in Indonesia.
As a Filipino, we were christianized. But in the Philippines we still considered women as equals. Like in ancient times. The only time women are considered less is when the Spanish is in charge and considered them less than men. But Filipinos always considered them as partners. Through out Philippine History they proved their role in society like the Babaylans in pre-hispanic, and revolutionary leaders like Gabriella Silang and Tandang Sora, and Teresa Magbanua in WW2 the only Female Guerilla Leader. Also I'm a man and I respect Women.
The fact that many manuscript stolen or burned during colonialism era really suppressed the identity of South East Asian. We forget about how our people civlization are actually not lesser than middle east, europe, or egypt, they just different. Different value, different language, and different form of governance
I don't know what the European colonists did to suppress the S E history and culture, but it is my conclusion from my reading of history that we Indians should be grateful to the European colonists and missionaries who researched and dug up Indian history from Harappan until the nineteenth century. The west Asian muslim chroniclers also contributed substantially.
@@jamesmk1841 From what I knew, they brought many of our old manuscripts during colonialism. Most of our old manuscripts regarding to our history , notes, civil administration during Majaphit era,etc are still on Leiden university,Netherland. Colonialist knew exactly what important for the area they colonized, and not just gold, spices or any other resources, but also the history of the nation they colonized in order to imply inferiority complex to the people they colonized. Colonized people mostly forget about how great they are before being colonized because many of that notes regarding to that are taken by the colonizer.
For example As Hindustan yourself, you are great nation, many early civilizations come from your area, but thats all we all knew. The notes regarding to the details of that era and after before colonisation begun usually starts to fade in details. Imagine when the europe still in dark era, your people have been able to live in rich with structured trade city. It is a bit funny when colonizer come, suddenly we are thought as non developed and barbar nations or people, while we knew our nations thriving all this time even without them with our own value and way of life.
Western are not the sole bearer of modern knowledge, China,Arab, even Hindustan are contribute their share into todays modern life. There will be no modern time without paper invented in China and brought by Arabs to all this world. The colonization all this time that make us start to think that we are inferior without them, I think the video above explained a bit about it to justify the colonisation effort they done.
@@jamesmk1841Part of what you said is correct. The missionaries? No! Do you know Sanskrit posses the largest manuscript tradition in the world! By conservative estimate, they are approximately 50 million manuscripts, not to mention the lost and destroyed ones.
Nah we love Christianity and Hispanic culture influence
@@JMB_focusno. it creates confusion and feels like youre borrowing from other's culture. look at thailand. barely contaminated. they are thai, buddhist, and all pure their culture. i envy them
just look at the fact that for thousands of years India was ruled by Muslim governments and the Hindu Buddhist Dharma people there couldn't do anything about it. and it was during this period that the Hindu-Buddhist kingdoms of Indonesia controlled Southeast Asia and spread the teachings of the Dharma from the Hindu-Buddhist patterned kingdoms. it was from this kingdom that ruled for Dharma when India was ruled by Muslim Empires for thousands of years.
SalakaNegara kingdom
Kutai Kartanegara kingdom
Tarumanagara Kingdom
Sanjaya kingdom
Sunda kingdom
Galuh kingdom
Pajajaran Kingdom
ancient Mataram kingdom
Kalinga kingdom
Sriwijaya kingdom
Dharmasraya Kingdom
Sailendra Kingdom
Medang Kingdom
kingdom of Kediri
Singosari Kingdom
Mataram kingdom
Majapahit kingdom
first in Indonesia namely SalakaNegara 100 BC and until the 16th century AD when Majapahit collapsed. At that time India was ruled by an Islamic empire. and it is so immoral that today's Indians claim that Southeast Asia became Hindu-Buddhist because of the efforts of Indian royalty. it's very arrogant and looks very fool because they don't study real history, f sake dude!
From f where hey! Indian hello????
Indians today can only claim that Southeast Asia has a lot of Hindu-Buddhist teachings and culture and language similar to India and they are proud of that, but now they even curse Indonesians just because they are Muslims, even though Indonesia used to spread Indian religion and culture in south east Asia. OMG India India India
Hello never did so called islamic invaders vontrolled all og India for once in history during 1700 too there was Vijayanagara empire see n research n for fuck sake also research how 3rd grade converts of indonesia was sent to goa who did genocide of Hindus offcourse the pure dharmic ways was spread propagated by Hindus by the liking of both locals n royals... Truth alone triumphs time will tell n give answer for everything
But Islam is only 1400 hundred years old. How could it be “for thousand of years” Islam ruled India? Do you read scholarly books?
@@jaychetra3250 whe warrior of Persian kill that Aryan people. Delhi Sultanate Mughal sultanate
@@jaychetra3250 Delhi Sultanate and Mughal a Persian warrior defeat Aryan people
@5:52 . Buddhism suffered from Islamic Invasions of country. Islamic oppression were brutal and wanted to convert entire country to Islam. To ensure Hinduism survived , Bhakti movement was initiated . That's why Hinduism survived in large nos.
Sanatan Dharma is all encompassing Dharma. Hindu ,Buddhs ,Sikhs ,Jains are all part of it.
Buddhism was only dominant for certain timeperiods. Not all times
Now I have become an atheist. If I fall into hell, I will rise up and lead a revolution to overthrow hell and establish a new state that serves and educates for the benefit of the people. If I go to heaven, I will lead my fellow angels to demonstrate about the issue of humanity and creatures. What kind of regime is up there or down there? It could be feudal, capitalist, communist, dictatorial, democratic, multi-party, one-party or constitutional government. Problem 3 worlds: Hell, Earth, Heaven, why don't they cooperate in inventing advanced military weapons to invade distant planets? 😅
Chera ,Cholas,Pandiyas are Tamil kingdom not a dravidian kingdom.Tamil is our identity. Tamil culture ,Tamil architecture
delhi sultanate is hyped .. it was never what is described . plus there are many important empires and kingdoms left out .
Most of time it was limited to delhi except khilzi and tuglaq .
Up ,punjab , delhi is its main area
Brother see the map of gurjar pratiharas ..that is enough ... actually it's not his fault central board history is north Indian history only. Greater bengal region was ruled by palas(then senas).... While studying Indian history you may have studied the term called kannauj triangle.
South east asia architecture is beautiful .
It is a mix of local and Indian as well as chinease .
I like fusion architecture .
it's mix of hindu-bhuddist architecture since people there adopt the religion. also they are not india and chinese descent, they are austronesian
@@blackrx89 i know
@@blackrx89 No, Autroasiatic descent first, and assimilated by Austronesians and Tai Kadai and Chinese over time.
@@blackrx89 wtf? Hindu-Buddhist architecture is literally Indian, so it is Indian-chinese.
@@gold-toponym tai ka dai and Austroasiatic might be true but not sinitic (Chinese).
Done my blood test, at least i have both except sinitic or Dravidian
Varna system becomes Caste system in india in medival period
The fact that java are actually more austroasiatic than austronesian brings interesting discussions of Java ancient connection with Khmer kingdoms. Jayavarman was supposedly in Java before going back.
Its also incorrect to say if the malay peninsula was through commerce and not agriculture. Particularly states in Java, were agriculture based.
Also malay is not a race. There are no malay in Sulawesi nor central borneo.
Please refer to my comment in this section as I clarify such things, and the connection between Khmer and Java, seen in the Kaladi and Sambor Prei Kuk temple inscriptions!
Genetics prove that the majority ethnicities of Southeast Asia are largely Austroasiatic descent and are assimilated by various Austronesian, Tai Kadai, and Sino-Burman groups, that's why most groups look similar, and some people look exactly the same despite being from different countries!
Javanese and all austroasiatics and other related SEA races were rice-based, and focused on agriculture, Han Chinese were originally wheat based before their expansions south!
The reason Java and Melayu Peninsular areas are more Austroasiatic is most likely due to the conflict between Austronesians, and also because the land was already prosperous and very populated, and agriculture-based, having rice as sustenance, and after the Sundaland shelf sank, most either went North and South! The ones that were separated were probably Khmer-Mon-Cham, and then you have the Javanese, Sundanese, Balinese whom went and stayed south in modern day Java!
This is probably an ancient connection and why Javanese and Khmer are mysteriously so very related, yet different and have a mysteriously similar and distinct culture!
The word "Lor" in the temple name Candi Plason "Lor" means "Northern" as khmer it means "Upper, northern, top"!
Melayu Malaysia juga lebih besar gen Austroasiatic daripada gen Austronesianya
Jadi sudah tahu kan sapa yang "MELAYU" yang sebenar???? Jadi rupanya orang jawa yang kalah perang hingga lari ke pulau??? Maknanya mereka kalah perang dengan Sukhotai??? Atau dengan bangsa Viet.... Hurm interesting.
@@illzyazMalaysia bukan pulau bro.
@@nutzhazel
Logika nya jangan Di balik
Justru orang orang pulau (dahulu semua disebut orang Jawa) yang datang ke semenanjung untuk perang melawan orang Mon Khmer Viet Di tahun 775 - 1350.
Sejak tahun 1351, orang orang pulau di semenanjung kalah oleh Siam, Portuguese, belanda, British.
British lah yang sebut keturunan orang orang pulau ini sebagai orang "melayu" yaitu saat census British tahun 1911.
I am just an amateur history buff, but I really like your style, sir. Thank you 🙏
✌️🌏☮️
India has influenced the whole world without conquering even a small piece of land 🇮🇳
Greetings from 🇮🇩
@@tengkuferdiansyah8617 thank you ✌️😊
Nope... It's Aji Saka/Ajivaka...
Not true.
Cholas had land in Malaysia/Indonesia.
Kushans in Central Asia.
Mauryas in Bactria.
IVC in Iran.
@@soumen_pradhan oo so kushans and mauriyas , cholas r not indian 🙄🤌, grow up kiddo 🤡
One remark that I would like to mention is that Ajanta and Ellora caves are not Buddhist. They were used by Buddishts but originally they were built buy Ancient Hindu civilizations and were places for great Hindu minds to think, meditate and invent.
*_Masa Hindu-Budha di Indonésia paling maju pada masanya, terbukti dengan ditemukannya banyak bangunan Megah peribadahan seperti Candi BOROBUDUR, Candi PRAMBANAN, Candi SÉWU, Candi PLAOSAN, Candi MUARA TAKUS, dll..._*
*_Angkor Wat saja yang bangun oléh campur tangan Keraja'an dari Jawa. Dan sebelum Angkor Wat dibangun, di Jawa sudah banyak berdiri Candi2 megah!!!_*
*_Tapi di vidéo ini tidak dibahas!!!_*
👌😎👍
@@frost6471 *_My pleasure Bro!!!_*
Thanks for telling us what we are not taught only in higher classes.
!slam IS the enemy of humanity. And we must all work t9gether to end this inhumane cylt
India existence is just to be incel haters of Muslims
@@supremercommonder India existed far before Islam. India came with the Indus Valley Civilization in 3300 BCE. Islam came with Muhammad in 620s CE
@@indiafirst3676 You misunderstand and no proof Indus Valley followed Hinduism that started in the Veda period. Hindus love to make shit up. Also islam never started with muhammed. Islam started with Adam meaning submission to god. The Kaaba was built before Abraham’s time with ishmeal around 4000 bc
@@supremercommonder Indus Valley Civilization practiced Nature Worship which later became a part of Indic Religions. Just see the Pashupati Seal excavated from IVC.
And Adam being Muslim has no proofs its just a mythology. Infact Christianity & Judaism doesn't regard Muhammad as a Prophet or Islam as a religion. On top of that Majority of Early Prophets of the Abrahamic Religions were Jews like Moses and Jesus.
Adam itself is a Westernised Name not even an Islamic Name to start with. I have never seen any Muslim with name Adam till date. Saw many Israelis ir British People with that name though
@@indiafirst3676 don’t matter what christans regard. they them selves are a paganised Judaism. It was corrupted with Roman paganism and Celtic paganism mixed with Judaism who the prophet Jesus never taught that he is god. They have no scripture to back up there church claim same with Hinduism.
What does Islam mean Islam mean one who worships and submits his will to the one god. This is what was down by Adam himself. Yh proto nature worship is just sharmanic relgion. Show me manuscripts connecting dhama and Indus Valley. Even in the Old Testament it predicts the prophet muhammed it specifically talks about arabia and mount paran it talks about a prophet who will come to the children of kedar second son of ishmeal who the prophet decenda from. Even in the torah the story of ishmeal is there. We do the same ritual of Hagar and ishmeal and Abraham did over 6000 years ago. Abraham was not a Jew or a christan rather he was a Muslim who submitted his will to god. Same with adam and all relgion. Even dharma in it origins is monotheistic but changed over time with man. Even in Africa they found the oldest practise of relgion is monotheistic. religions that predate hunter gathers of India. In Islam Allah sent 124,000 prophets to mankind from Adam to every nation all the way until prophet muhammed the last messenger. All prophets taught the same thing.
Great overview, very helpful for class next week!!
The fall of Persia to the Muslims had direct impact on the Indian kingdoms.
Buddhism weakened Indian kingdoms
No priest class in islam? Thats bullshit. They have their imams and maulavis.
The scars of islamic jihad ( genocide of hindus ) by mughals and turkic sultnate can still be seen on indian society .
The mentality of pakistan and Indian sub continent muslim can be drived from these empires .
Central Asian are the strongest race
@@iamgreat1234no its not
It’s incredible how they just skipped South Indian history, it’s infuriating
south Indian kingdoms aside vijayanagara is quite obscure, especially chola ,
@@mohammadnoor9697 what’s the point of the prime minister speaks of the South Indian culture when half his people don’t even know the history of the south. The centre has time and again proved their bias that the nations history is built by the north and the contributions of the south is little to none. When the south voices their opinions we are suppressed but the money that we provide is accepted desperately with open arms.
@@sml4813 we need more research on the chola, cheras, pala, malay attack on Sri Lanka, chola counter attack
@@sml4813 half the people don't know about Indian history at all, be it south or north. Even those who are educated know only of the three mauryas and three Gupta emperor, rest non. Who is nagabhata? Who is Rana sanga? Who is ajatshatru? Who is bimbisara? Who puspamitra? Northies don't know their own kings, and i dare say that's also the condition of south, tho to a lesser degree. The only exception are for some goddamn reason the Mughals. We don't know our own emperors, but know the entire bloodline of a bunch of savage turks
@@sml4813 Half their Indian dont know their own history, let alone south. We all know Muslim history. Thats all thats taught to us. You can thank the first five education ministers who were Muslims and left institutions.
india the first civilizations and religion in this world before jenovah ,yaheh jesus, allah and buddha ,zeus, came to be.
India was not the first civilisation nor Hinduism the first religion - they were older religions and even Zoroastrianism is considered older by records while civilisations have all be recorded to be in the Middle East first.
@@madeachanneljustcauseican3968 Hinduism is older than Zoroastrianism. What history records are you reading and by who?
@@anixes look again. Zoroastrianism came before both in terms of written records and also orally as it is a successor to another religion
Tho animist may also contend with that.
@@madeachanneljustcauseican3968 yeah , until Islamist destroyed zororastrians
@@kuchbhi2638 Zoroastrianism still exist and wasn’t exactly destroyed by Islam.
It was already declining among their client states who became Christian’s and constant invasions by Persian or religious prosecution of non Zoroastrianism ultimately led to more internal and external issues causing the downfall of the regime. Took hundreds of years for most the citizenship to convert to Islam anyway.
Theravada Buddhists is not only followed in srilanka etc..its still followed in north east india..my people have been following theravada from time immemorial our people are called the tai khamtis (robbed of a history by the British)
Oh I've never met an Tai Khamti on the internet, greetings from South India.
Can you tell me more about your people and modern say situation of your people?
@@bonemarrow3439 well the tai khamtis are predominantly concentrated in the indian district of Namsai in Arunachal Pradesh and spread in the nearby state of assam also our close kins were the Tai Ahoms of the Ahom dynasty... We also have a history with the brits ...in the name of sipoy mutiny 1857(we know it as one of the first struggle for independence from the colonial power in india...but there is no recognition of my people😞 ....we were known as vicious warriors and feared amongst the britishers ...... we are proud indians and patriotic to our core....and for tourism we have ..golden pagoda temple ,giant Buddha statue...and our festival is known as sangken similar to holi but without any colour ....just clean water to each other we also pray to buddha during the festival........in a nutshell😀
@@bonemarrow3439 as i know ...my people were considered to be a danger to the british as we put up strong resistance from the british divided my people into two part....to be weaker ...that is why my people are located in both assam and arunachal pradesh...and we failed during the war..and washed of history
@@chowrahulsimit1864 Yeah and also Chakma and Barua people of Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh practice Theravada Buddhism too. People always associate Vajrayana or Mahayana Buddhism with the form of Buddhism practiced in mainland South Asia (Nepal, India, Bhutan) but are unaware that Theravada Buddhism is also practiced by groups in northeastern South Asia (Northeast India, Bangladesh).
@@chowrahulsimit1864 that’s interesting, in Thailand we have Songkran, I think we get it from the Indian who spread all this Buddhism culture but can’t tell from where exactly, like we know India have Holy with color , but we just use water, I think you guy have the nearest name to us.
Khmer empire is the most underrated and the most powerful in the 12th century mostly over shadow, the ancient city of angkor is even bigger than modern day L.A and expert said that it is impossible to reconstruct Angkor wat than modern day l.a
Our Khmer history 💪
Okay I really need to clear up some misinformation regarding Southeast Asia in many points, let's go:
We start with the Austronesian expansion right away; as most academia focus most solely on the greatness of Austronesians in ways that others have been overlooked.
So after the Australian Aborigines, Papuan Melanesian, and Negrito peoples, we have the *Austroasiatics*, whom set foot on the landmass of Sundaland indicated by early agricultural evidence provided that was even earlier than the determined Austronesian expansion (starting from Taiwan to Luzon and the Northern Philippines, before they started spreading to and from south, west, and east toward Polynesia),
Austroasiatics were among the earliest, along with Hoabinhians to be in Sundaland and settle before the seas rose and completely isolated the maritime and mainland parts of Southeast Asia. Genetics also prove this, with Javanese, Balinese, Sundanese, Peninsular Malay, peoples of Sumatra and Borneo having at least 20% of Austroasiatic ancestry, up to 50-60% for Javanese, Peninsular Malay, Cham, Balinese, and Sundanese peoples; people often liken their appearance to the mainland (Cambodia / Khmer).
Austroasiatics diversified quickly due to millenia of isolation but retained cultural similarities and an influx of syncretized Indian / South Asian cultures; nearly around that same time, Austronesians arrived causing conflict between groups in the former Sundaland area.
THEN
You have the Austronesian expansion, from Madagascar to Easter Island and perhaps the Americas and Japan.
Both the Austroasiatic, Austronesian, and Tai-Kadai were ancestral rice cultivator farmers, the first in the world, spreading rice to (at least the eastern and southern parts of) India, and China (believe it or not); Han were wheat farmers, not rice.
Malays and Cham are assimilated largely Austroasiatic peoples, especially Central Thai who look like Mon-Khmer peoples in Siam (Central Thailand).
-----------------------------------------------
NOW, we have Funan, evidences and theories have suggested the Austroasiatics spread by water to populate sundaland, and the earliest excavations are from coastline areas of the ancient Mon and Khmer sites in Funan (the Mekong Delta now acquired by Vietnam), and Bangkok Chao Phraya area (now acquired by Thais // Assimilated Mon-Khmers.
As any other place, why can't one ethnic group have more multiple competing kingdoms? **So, Chenla and Funan were both Khmer as Mon had Dvarawati, Thaton, and Haripunchai kingdoms.**
and just like Malays had many kingdoms *(Ligor Negara Sri Dhammaraj, Langkasuka, Srivijaya)*, how come we can't say the same for Khmer and have double standards? This is a target point for nationalistic Thais and Vietnamese and Malays *(the latter thinking mainlanders are all Chinese)*.
*FUNAN - is the Chinese interpretation of the word "Phnom" a word still used today in Khmer meaning mountain*, and has uses in Thai language, and is the first word of the Khmer capital city. There is a cultural continuity especially in the styles of the arts and temples of the Mekong Delta area (not just Vietnam but southern Cambodia) which reflects the succeeding Angkorian period temples all around the mainland!
*Considering the ways the map is drawn, Funan included Austroasiatic minority and majority groups, including Cham, Mon, and Malay (they having listed this as their first kingdom), and they even see similarities between Kelantanese, Cham and Khmer, (genetically this is also proven despite nationalist claims).*
-----------------------------------------
After the Angkorian era, influential Mons spread Theravada Buddhism that became the mainstream Khmer religion as it passed from Hinduised eras.
Nowadays the former eras of the Khmer empire have biracial and assimilated Mons and Khmers mixed with Tai - Kadai (Lao, others) peoples, and Chinese till current.
Khmer and Cham inscriptions call these people Syam, maybe related to Shan peoples, or it may be a reference to "stranger" or "dark skinned / clothed" peoples. (There is a province called Siam Reap).
There is also a great relationship between Javanese and Khmer that we have forgotten about.
This is a different set of thinking but really really interesting for me, gotta love to know more
@@nettilee2696 yes, you will also see the syncretic Indianized and Austroasiatic culture in the temples and demeanor of ancient Javanese and Khmer, and the western / known ethnics of SEA! The gold Aristocratic Austroasiatic culture is synonymous and practiced in all Western SEA culture, and parts of Philippines in ancient / current times!
Be Sure to check out Khmer, Javanese, Balinese, Malay, Sundanese Thai crowns, and observe the culture of dayaks and compare the culture to the sculptures on the Angkor temples.
Indians called these areas "SuvarnaBhumi and Dvipa", for the exchange of spices, but also because the gold that was present in the high culture.
And yes there is evidence for cultivated rice fields that have been dated earlier than the Austronesian expansion period in Java, but you have the earliest rice fields in Philippines Luzon near Taiwan (near Austronesian expansion point), dating back the Austronesian expansion area, which of course happened later, and they are older than the ones in Southern Philippines, proving this point.
There is also no reason not to believe that Austroasiatics engaged in waterways, and most of all sailing, whether it was due to Austronesian contact or not, Tai kadai also sailed, as the rest of Southern Pre Han Chinese China did.
The Munda of India arrived in India by shore almost weirdly, and they genetically cluster with Aslians (Check the video "Austroasiatic Waterworld" by Paul). This shows that Austroasiatics engaged in seafaring and was not exclusive to just Austronesians, though they have made great achievements as the greatest sailors prehistory.
The countries closest to china (vietnam, thailand, laos and burma) especially, but also the rest of SEA cant be compared to the past of how people MAYBE have looked like, do NOT have a “specific appeareance” a lot of my Thai family members look very diverse ( and here im not including my thai-chinese mixed family members). Many thais (friends , family and other ppl i know ,living in thailand) look very much east asian but still with brown skin (facial features), while some look more south asian ( like indian) or how people “expect” SEA to look like. Theres no such thing as a typical look, thais can look like anything around us (nearby countries). Most SEA i know look much like a mix between polynesians ans east asian (many filipinos nowadays are mixed with japanese) same as a LOT of southeast asians are mixed with chinese or indian ,vietnamese etc.
You did mention that SEA is mixed with chinese , but the % is higher than ppl think, because only going by appeareance you dont always see it in every person, as the chinese % in one person can be low ,and the appeareance took more from the non chinese parts. I have several thai-chinese mixed cousins, 2 of them are brothers , one looks more like his mom (her family is originally only chinese, but in thailand as thai citizens with thai citienship ,since they are in thailand since countless generations already) and one more like his dad (who is thai ,but looks a bit more like a east/southeast asian mix). The brother who doesnt look like his chinese mom would mainly not be mistaken for chinese, as he does not have more typical east asian features, yet he is in fact HALFchinese, so he doesnt even have a low % chinese in him… appeareances can vary no matter how low or high the % is. Most ppl are not aware of having chinese roots, so ofcourse many would think its “not that many” in SEA who have some chinese in them. Ppl need to stop going by only looks.
+ Thai or lao arent specifically “originally” just from one place, especially the countries closest to china (again, thailand, vietnam, laos and burma region, no matter what these regions once belonged to, before they turned to a own country) are most likely asian mixed more or less from begin with, migration has been going on since the beginning of humanity… i highly doubt that they were ever 100% pure ethnic from any specific volk. And its actually even a debatte from scientists now, that the thai and lao etc are dna wise closest to chinese ,hence that the main origin of the “actual thais and lao” ppl originates in South china.
Which is at least somewhat believable ,as our Thai language and lao are in the Tai-kadai language family SAME AS the zhuang dialect (a south chinese language) is also in the tai-kadai language family. The ZHUANG dialect is also where lao and thai language have theyr most chinese words from, hence why ppl do not get, that all tonal languages in SEA do highly come from china but all picked theyr influences from different chinese languages. Ofcpurse only compared to mandarin there isnt much similiarity. Cambodian is NOT a tonal language like chinese/thai/viet etc is , so ppl notice that even less with that language.
Not all chinese languages are sino-tibetan. Tho ofcourse most ppl are not aware of that as they only know about cantonese and mandarin chinese mainly…
Also , chinese, thai, vietnamese etc are NOT different races ,they are different ETHNICITIES.
ASIAN is a Race,
and all of them (thai, chinese and so on) ARE FROM the ASIAN Race.
@@mxd-1990asn Everyone knows that all East and Southeast Asians are from the same race.
For the sake of breaking it down, for others to realize it more easily, we have to use "race" because ethnicity does not work between the different groups.
There are genetic differences, albeit still close. We can say "sub-race" Race means division
We can use the ethnolinguistic words, but people who do not study this like us here, would not know what "Austroasiatic, tai kadai" are.
I will respond to the rest of your response later.
Can I just say that I love history!????
Yes! Permission granted!
@@MadeInHistory I wish you could have included even at least a bit of Philippine history into this video. We are often overlooked and not mentioned at all... as if our history and culture only started when the Spaniards arrived... 😒😒😒
I recommend this lecture about Philippine history, at the Asia Society Museum.
ua-cam.com/video/U_BjtFu7L38/v-deo.html
I also recommend ("Transforming Manila: China, Islam and Spain in a Global Port City" - by Ethan Hawkley).
If you wanna see how important South Indian Tamil and Chinese cultures are in Southeast Asia, look at Thailand today. Thailand is the best place that mixes both cultures well to create Thai elements, which is now the beacon of Southeast Asia 🇹🇭😌
Thailand and combodia is influenced by Kalinga
@@avinavpal1403 Pretty much most of Southeast Asia. Thats why its called Indo-China.
@@avinavpal1403HM NO, thailand is influenced by SEVERAL countries, not just one. India is part of, but so is China too and partly cambodia (even tho the cambodian parts that influenced thailand came from india in the first place too,…but since theyre more of theyr own now, i count it in).
Actually NO country in SEA is influenced by only one nearby country. Buddhism would be one from india that most SEA shares + china that is for a good %also buddhist ,even tho its not the majority here but at least on the higher % ( i come from a Thai + chinese mixed family in thailand).
The nearest SEA countries to china arent Tonal languages out of nowhere (thai and lao were once closer to sino-tibetan language and mixed up with old sanskrit words later on through the indian monks that came to india, while cambodian is NOT a tonal language at all). Thai and lao were mainly influenced by SOUTH Chinese dialects, hence why a lot of ppl who are at least familiar woth mandarin and cantonese do not see much similarity there. While in fact not even all chinese lnguages are sino-tibetan.
Thai and lao have most similarity with the Zhuang dialect (south chinese dialect) which is actually part of the tai-kadai languages , SAME AS Thai and Lao. Some loanwords came from other south and southwest dialects of china. The numbers in zhuang and thai/lao are 90% the same with only very slight differences in tonals. Many words in thai, lao vs zhuang are similar too.
All in all Vietnam ,thailand and burma are still highly chinese influenced too beside of the indian influence that is also high.
A LOT of our food is either actually completely from china but simply slightly changed sometimes by recipe in thailand, or its a mix of thai and some chinese influence. The thai language how it is NOW ,contains mostly southern chinese and sanskrit loanwords than anything else.
@@mxd-1990asnLets just say everyone influences each others
When i see Thailand culture first thing comes to my head is India,when i look at the people some look like Chinese but the majority not.
Bro forgot Thirukural
Southeast Asia never had a truly caste system
We kinda did, but not too complex
@@zephdo2971 like what?
Balinese hindu does have caste system and sometimes they can't get married because of that
you must be kidding. even in modern times it still exist.
@Karjo Adiyanto But it's nothing compared to how caste system works in India. Caste system in Bali is pretty much limited to culture and religion for rather conservative Balinese. I have many Balinese friends who don't give a damn about their caste, and marry whoever they want, even with person from other ethnic group with different religion. The same thing will be a big deal and be frown upon by society in India. Often causes tragic consequences like honor killing
Srivijaya kingdom and Majapahit kingdom the two biggest kingdom empire Hindu-Buddha in south east Asia. Indonesia have "Borobudur" the biggest Buddhis temple in the world. In ancient Times, (Indonesia🇮🇩, Malaysia🇲🇾, temasik/Singapura🇸🇬, Brunai🇧🇳) = "Nusantara" were united kingdom the Majapahit empire by the Patih gadjah Madha
Great explanation man , Indians were literally the first and most educated civilizations ever , Our Greatest Kingdoms , our culture , Our ultra legendary history and First educational institutions , deep emphasis and even discovery of many subjects are from India🚩🇮🇳🇮🇳
Your not the first, it's the mesopotamian Babylonian civilization in the middle east next is Africa next is India and then the minoan civilization all of them are just as great
@@JMB_focus africans were not even there during our Indus valley civilization
@@JMB_focus hope you know messoppotonians traded witg indus valley civilization in india?.. means they were contomperory civilizations egyptians were also contemporary to indus valley civilizations... chinese beacame a civilization later... greeks followed, rome, etc etc
@@ahanachauhan1210 do you have proof
@@deepblue3682 mesopotamian civilization is definitely the first almost all people in the world knows that
fun fact: the buddism and hinduism in java Indonesia were slightly different because they had been assimilated with javanese culture, and that characterustic counted for Islam as well.
ps:
- javanese culture was closer to madagascar and contrast to australia-newguenia like how contrast madagascar culture to africa
-java rice (oriza javanica) was closer ro japanese rice (oriza japonica) and differ from thailand rice or indian brasmati although in javanese it called beras close to brasmati
Well we call rice as "Bai" in Khmer-- doesn't have anything to do with basmati, crops archaeological history proves that rice was first domesticated by Southeast Asians in southern China before Han expansion.
SEA are: Austroasiatic, then Austronesian, Tai Kadai, and Sino-Burman.
We spread rice to Chinese and Indians!
@@gold-toponym yeah, but what i mean rice in india to thailand is simillar type of rice, but rice in jawa is simillar to japanese rice. although in history, Indonesia (sriwijaya and majapahit) had connection to india, and had no connectin with japan before japanese expantion, at least that what written in history. and i think there is missing link some where
@@mnhusin509Japanese trade with Southeast Asia. I’m sure they got a bunch of different species of rice from Southeast Asian kingdoms. Brought it back to Japan and find out that the fat short rice grows well in that climate. Nature will answer your question.
@@Handle_Edit maybe, there is no note of japanese interaction in ancient time at least in my history textbook, the only interaction recorded was when japan invade asia in 1940s.
and there is 2 variety of javanese rice that so similar to japanese the regular rice prettty similar and also, in java there is a rice variety called "ketan bintik" literally mean "dot shape sticky rice" but now a day only few cultivate it because low harvest yield, but i think it very simillar to japanese short grain rice or mochi rice
@@mnhusin509 wow really dude? Research more then. That’s all I can say.
Khushans don't interest me it's too recent wrt bharats history. Many sites excavated in recent times pushes India's timelines beyond western beliefs EG nubra valley , the sunken city of Dwarka. South Indian records show of the debt Rome was in to these south Indian port cities that many times they gave white women to the Hindu kings as part payment bec Rome desired all that was Indian yet couldn't pay back for their hunger.
The Kitub Minaar qas a Hindu structure. the place of Sufis i9s important. cast did not disappear when a Hindu converted, Dalits still remained Dalits. The land given to the Sikhs was by Akbar. ALSO: Sikhs saw themselves as protectors of Dharma and all Dharmic religions.
Lol we HINDUS ARE STILL THRIVING !
How many pegan religions alive in the western and middle-east?
Not a single like look what afghans did with ancient statue that were carved in big stone hills 😑😑 Thanks to Islam and it's religious teaching
Ayutthaya is Ayodhya in the Ramayana of ancient India. Thai kings were often named Rama. Even today the Thai royal courts use Sanskrit and Brahmin priests for Vedic pujas. Ganesha and Vishnu are lively in Thai culture and language. The churning of the ocean of milk, samudra-manthan in the Mahabharat meaning history of the Great India is prominently displayed in Bangkok's Suvarnabhumi Airport which in and of itself is based upon Vedic Puranic legends of South East Asia.
Wangsa Sailendra or Syailendra (Śailendramśa) is the name of the dynasty or dynasty of kings who ruled in Mdaŋ (Medang Kingdom or Ancient Mataram Kingdom), in Central Java since 752 and ruled Sriwijaya, on the island of Sumatra since the leadership of Balaputradewa Putra from Central Java. Most of its kings were adherents and protectors of Mahayana Buddhism. However, according to the Sojomerto inscription, Dapunta Sailendra, who became the ancestor of the Sailendra dynasty, was a Hindu of the Siwa sect. From Central Java, and the Sailendra dynasty is thought to have originated from the Kalingga Kingdom in the 5th century in Central Java and has many relics of temples located on the Kedu plains, Central Java. Besides originating from Central Java, other areas such as Sumatra or even India and Cambodia, was once proposed as the origin of this dynasty, but there are no sideboards or inscriptions to support it.
Borobudur temple was built in 740 AD when the Syailendra dynasty was located in the ancient Medang or Mataram kingdom on the island of Java which ruled Java, Sumatra, the peninsula of Malaysia and Cambodia, but one of the kings who was placed in the power of the Syailendra kingdom, namely Jayavarman in Cambodia, betrayed the head of the royal family in Java and founded the Khmer empire in Cambodia
in India it is written on the Nalanda inscription in the 9th century
"We were asked by the illustrious Maharaja Balaputradewa, king Suwarnadwipa through a courier arranged by me to build a monastery at Nalanda which this decree granted to dedicate to the blessed Buddha, the abode of all the great virtues such as the Prajnaparamita, for worship, offerings, knowledge , shelter, alms, bed, the needs of the sick like medicine;....."
the Nalanda inscription
There is a kind-hearted king who comes from Suwarnadwipa(Sumatra) named Balaputradewa from the Syailendra dynasty who is a Buddhist descendant of Wiravairimathana.
The south indian style isnt dravidian but pallava style
Pallava were Aryans thier officecal launguage was prakrit and Sanskrit
@@Deccan-pride aryan my ass.. there is no such thing.. we are all dravidian in India. Expect maybe some central asians in Afghanistan and western pakistan and tibetoburman in north east
@@Sticklemako Denial won’t change the facts.
The South Chinese language (dialect) “ZHUANG” is actually ALSO a Tai-Kadai language , SAME AS Thai and lao.
Not all chinese languages are sino-tibetan.
Mahayana Buddhism was not only spread to east asia. It was actually spread eastward to southeast asia, especially to the indonesian archipelago. It was the most popular branch of Buddhism in ancient kingdoms such as sriwijaya and mataram (java). Borobudur was a reminder of this era. Ancient Javanese also produced some buddhist text that is still have its influence on Balinese hinduism, such as "Sang Hyang Kamahayanikan".
In Java, buddhism later mixed with Shaivism and formed a siwa-buddha sect during the middle ages. This sincretism would later be evolved into (or at least influence) what is now Balinese hinduism.
Why is the Tamil language culture and architecture not touched in this vast Recount why
the Tamils suppressed Even to this day.
cant wait for your vid about Vietnam, keep up the good work!
Lacto tolerant, rice with Himalayan fresh water. No wonder india has high population even in hot climate.
As a Cambodian, I can say that you butcher all pronunciation of the khmer word except the word Cambodia.
But still, I really appreciated the effort you put in for this type of video, as the internet mostly only show north american, and european history. This type of video really show other perspective of the entire human history.
I only learn today, that at ours peak, we are stronger than the Byzantine Empire. 32:20
Jayavarman actually pronoun "Jei-var-ra-mant" by us local here
NOBODY outside of Cambodia speaks Khmer, nor are they expected to. & if Jayavarman is romanised as Sanskrit/ Pali, that's how it's going to be pronounced in English. Nobody even says Suvarnabhumi Airport like how the Thais pronounce it, & that word is used in modern everyday life by non-Thais.
@@JumpoableSouth Vietnam speak Khmer because those Khmer are the first indigenous people during the first Khmer Phnom Kingdom (Funan) of Cambodia and other Khmer people still living in Surin, Buriram, Korat plateau in Thailand still speak Khmer. Those Khmer are Khmer people outside of Cambodia speaking Khmer. Thai were Tai people from South China running from the Mongols invasion their mother land Nanchao, China. The Khmer King Jayavarman VIII allowed Tai refugees to live in the Khmer province Sukhotei. Later, a Chinese Uthong from China with the help of Ming and the Tai refugees betrayal of Khmer, they were able to invade Khmer province Sukhotei. Uthong declared himself as a God King in the traditional of Khmer God King and declared independence from Khmer in 1350. In 1767, the Burmese army came to destroy Ayutthaya and another Chinese Taksin from China with the help of the Chinese Qing, he was able to restore Ayutthaya and Taksin declared himself as God King in the Khmer tradition God King. His Chinese clan buried him in his home town in Guangdong China. Without the Khmer and the Chinese, Thailand could’t be existed today. Ram Kamheing a Khmer-Tai bilingual created Tai alphabet from the Khmer language and Khmer number. Khmer number has been written on all Thai currency today.
ua-cam.com/video/M-T9q-mBdqk/v-deo.html
Khmer King Kaudinya Jayavarman I was an Indian Prince Kumeru from South India married to the native Khmer Queen Soma Devi (Princess Nagi of Kokthlok) and they founded the first Khmer Phnom Kingdom (Funan) in the first century. Khmer King Kampu Swayambhuva was an Indian -Persian from North Indian married to the native Khmer Queen Mera Devi (Great great grand daughter of King Kaudinya and Queen Soma of Phnom (Funan) in the third century, they founded the second Khmer Kingdom of Kampuchea (Cambodia-Chenla). Thai were Tai native from Southern China Nanchao, the birthplace of Tai native spoken language.
Tai people took refugees during the Mongols invasion their motherland Nanchao, China and the Khmer King Jayavarman VIII allowed them to live in the Khmer province Sukhotei. Ram Kamheing was a Khmer-Tai bilingual created Tai alphabet from the Khmer alphabet and Khmer number so they can write to communicate with Khmer people. Khmer number are written on all Thai currency today. Later, a Chinese Uthong from China with the help of Tai refugees betrayal of Khmer and with the help of the Chinese Ming from China, they were able to invade Khmer province Sukhotei. Uthong declared himself a God King of Siam in the traditional Khmer God King and declared independence from Khmer in 1350. In 1767, the Burmese came to burn and destroy Ayutthaya, another Chinese Taksin from China with the help of the Chinese Ming, he was able to kick the Burmese out of Ayutthaya. A Chinese Taksin again declared himself as a God King of Lop Borei in the traditional Khmer God King. Without the Khmer and the Chinese, Thailand could’t be existed today. Chinese Taksin Siam-Tai King tomb in China ua-cam.com/video/M-T9q-mBdqk/v-deo.html
The Khmer language of Cambodia has the longest alphabet in the world. Hindi, Tamil etc..are all behind the Khmer alphabet.
Hindu has influenced almost all Asia
I am Cambodian historian, It is sad that Cambodians are taught and misinformed about our great legendary Hinduism. Khmer Empire would not have existed without Hinduism God Kings. The major shift from Hinduism to Buddhism that marked the end of Khmer Empire. 90% of Cambodian are now Buddhis and have forgottened our great ancestors glory days. Cambodians are taught that the four faces are either King Jayavarman VII or Buddha's. The government have to do with wrong teaching, or they just don't understand Hindu. The four faces are belong to lord Brahma, one of the major Hindu deities.
Don't fret, brother. The future of SE Asia is surely Hindu!
problems
1 need a clarification on Afghanistan. is it part of subcontinent or not
2 the Delhi Sultanate was not a single entity, it is a collective name for many dynasty.
No
Afghanistan is not part of Indian sub continent .
But since 5000 years it is heavily influenced by Indian civilization .
Even today most afghani play indian style cricket , know hindi , urdu and watch indian drama and movies .
Afghanistan was under indian control during mahabharta , mahajanpad , Moryan , Kushan , Gupta , Hindu shahi dynasties .
After that turks cobtrolled afghanistan
Kapisa, Gandhar these places were ruled by Hindu Kings and now these places fall in Afghanistan
You have no clue what your talking about ^^
Indonesia is the center of Nusantara, Indonesia is the true descendants of Srivijaya and Majapahit not malay, stop saying Indonesia is malay. The existing history textbook is made by western, for their purposes.
You guys are MALAY. Malay is not just an ethnic. It was a RACE. If you kept this narrow-minded thinking you're going nowhere. The colonials were right when they called this area "MALAY ARCHIPELAGO".Dont confuse Malay with ethnic Malay that were natives throughout S.E.A and Malaysia. All Austronesian ethnic can be considered as MALAY. We were fortunate that our country solved this confusion since independence. Although the same cannot be said about your country, and with the way you guys think, you're going nowhere. You guys rather be associated with Indians rather than your own race. Which is funny. 🤣.
@@JayAnuar Well well from your comment I can guess that you're Malaysian. A country that is overproud that everything should base on Islam, thinks that they're the most Islam, n of course so over proud of malay that even thinks they're the most malay... Lol. And you're so proud that have been fooled by your kerajaan lol. Cause why not, the one who makes and uses malay race is only westerner.. n your country is so proud of the western country, cause they give you independence. But, from history.. the malay word is used cause malacca is so afraid of the domination of Thai culture in the north and Javanese culture in the south. N westerner uses malay to describe all regions cause they're too lazy to search for the differences. They just are like, "they are all not too tall, have brownish skin, n I believe every island speaks the same language as this place, they all must be malay." It's just cause they're too lazy lol. It's the same with Arab people calling the person in the Indonesian archipelago bani jawi. Cause the Javanese were maybe the first people from this archipelago that have contact with the Arab world. So they think everyone from this archipelago is Javanese/Jawa/jawi. But if you called everyone in this archipelago a jawi race right now, just because the Arabs think that everyone is jawa, no one will accept it lol. It's the same concept. To foreigners the first people they meet, that's the identities of the region. And the one who came to this archipelago and became the ancestors of every ethnicity is MALAYO not malay. Even malay was born from MALAYO. If you call malayo as malay it's the same case that you call a mongoloids as mongol. So every Asian is a Mongolian. Chinese, Korean, Japanese, and SEA all of them are Mongolian. Mongol is so great huh? The only and most suitable term for us is AUSTRONESIAN.. the people of the sea. There's nothing like malay race, only the AUSTRONESIAN race. But I believe it's so hard to accept the reality right.. after all, you have been fooled by your kerajaan from the independence day right .
@@JayAnuar see, you are one of their product
There was no Indonesia before. Nor Malaysia, Singapore or Philippines. If we wanna talk history, stop refering to present day countries.
Malaysia never claim Indonesia as Malay. Everyone agree Indonesia is Javanese, Sundanese and then Malay. The reason Malay are so spread out in Indonesia from Sumatra, Java, Borneo and Sulawesi because Malay are descendents of foreign traders.
I am proud to be indian
Curiously, just because of different religions, cultures, languages, the whole Indonesian Philippines does not want to be called the malayan Mongoloid😆. But they have the same physical characteristics. Only different cultures, languages, and religions. From their physical form, they match the exact race of austronesia /malayan mongoloid.
Theravada didn't favour the rich, acts of great material generosity was easily noted down in history. Everybody can become a monk,in Sri lanka prior to the advent of the Thai and Burmese monk order monks talked against the caste system but when Buddhism died out in Sri Lanka and was revived with Thai and Burmese monks they introduced the caste division and banning women to become Buddhist nuns.
@Where is Thai people come from ? Migration from Southern China?😮
They are crazy with Khom. Khom is not Khmer 😆
Khom is Siames Siames build Angkor Not Khmer Khmer was a slavery of Khom. The people of Southern Chinese wanted to be 5000 years history. They don't recognise themselves as a Southern Chinese.
@@champaputih4568ad story.. why don't come and take your Angkor wat 🤣🤣 can't right? Why UNESCO or ICJ can't help ? Cause of fake.. go prove it I waiting. if you can't then keep spam
👇
youtube.com/@UNESCO
👇
youtube.com/@unitednations
Do it if you dare..
@@champaputih4568 the funny thing is we found the 4-5,000 years of evidence of Tai people in Thailand, like the paintings in the cave, the ancient drums (2,000 years old)from Tai people, this kind of painting and ancient drum also found in south China, that mean there were Tai people that had already migrated in this area for a long time before the Tamil Indian came to mix with the local people and built up the kingdom.
About Khom, it’s the truth that the early Ayutthaya Kingdom are Khom people or you want to call it ancient Khmer or whatever, who fought and took back what it’s belong to their royal family, they have to revenge the rebel sweet melon, who was Cham, who are the ancestor of now Khmer. Sweet melon killed all the upper class and royal people. So Ayutthaya kingdom that was found by Supannaphum(Tai) and Lavo(Khom), as the Chinese call this kingdom as Siamlovo in their book, they have to revenged and took the town back, they also took all the people back to Ayutthaya, so what were left in Khmer land were actually mostly Cham people, not the Khom(or ancient Khmer or whatever you like to call) If you want to learn history you have to put down the crazy about nationality. There was no Thailand or Cambodia at that time. The war at that time was not a war between the Tai and Khmer but the war between the Varman royal family vs the rebel Cham. The Chinese who came at that time also wrote the book telling that the upper class and labor class were totally different people. There were many labor class people and few upper class people. (In my opinion the royal keep using the labor class people to built the big palaces too much to the point that they were upset and finally fought back.)
Btw I heard that in Cambodia they teach you in school that Sweet melon killed the previous Varman king and then become the king but didn’t mention that he was the rebel right? Do you think it make sense that someone who killed the king didn’t get punish by execution but became the king instead? How is that possible? The possibility is only he was the boss of rebel. And from then on there was no Varman in the king’s name anymore because they are not the same royal family who built the Angkor empire.
Most of history now was written by the western or French in the past who want to claim the land of Thailand as they already colonized Cambodia in the past. Like if Khmer create Siam then we could also colonize Siam same as Cambodia. Before even Daravadi coin that found in Thailand, the French said it’s from Khmer🤣 and then they changed it because too many evident showed how BS was that, now they said it belong to Mon. They avoid at all cost to mention the Tai.
Thai are Tai+Mon/Khom, by culture and by DNA of people from central and south of Thailand. The Tai have more influence because later on in Ayutthaya Era, the prince from Tai become king, the king had 4 main wife that came from different royal family like Lavo, Suphannaphum, Sukhothai, Later on the prince from the Supannaphum(Tai )wife became a king. So after that Tai culture had more influence and mix with the Mon/Khom.
@@vassanab4243
The real migration of Tai to Southeast Asia was from over 1000 years ago😁. 4500 years ago you meant the Ban Chiang, 😁
Thai historians claimed Ban Chiang belong to Austroasiatic people not the Tais.
Khom is a big joke of Thailand 😆. When the whole world knows only Chia or India But the Thai tried to tell the whole world Jek or Khaek. 😆 Soryy We don't know KrungThep we only Know Bangkok.
In Khmer history there's no a king name sweet Melon. That's a big joke. Khmer chronicle history was full of myth. Sweet Melon the Western history could not find the real or reasonable. The Sweet Melon was belong to Burmanese origin.
Thai extremist Nationalism wants to build up their own history for the Thai when the whole world knows Thai or Siamese was freed from Khmer. Sorry We need the real history not the imagination of the Chompon.
Lots of misinformation here about india
Put in enough ads mate? won't be watching any of your videos without adblock ever again, you opted to play them every couple of minutes.
NOKOR PHNOM (FUNAN) is same as Khmer Kingdom. Thank you
I don’t see any sources in the description, comments, or on the video. Please put them next time. You can’t make anything academic without sources.
Could you please make a video on the Greco-Bactrian Kingdoms,
My first ever bike was my 75 CB125s “Bender” best learner bike
south east asians and indians need to stronger there ties
जाति और caste बहुत बहुत अलग है। आज के समय हम caste को नहीं चाहते बल्कि यह चाहते है कि फिर से जाति वर्ण व्यवस्था आ जाए। जाति कुल वर्ण व्यवस्था एक उन्नत समाज का प्रतीक है।
Inko yeh samajh nahi ayega bhai
Indian caste system ka decline economic decline ki vajah se tha. Or Economic decline invasion or exploitation ki vajah se tha. India m kabhi slave revolution nhi hua. Kyunki so called lower caste or labour class ka exploitation nhi hua. Unke exploitation islamic Invasions or British colonisation ka sbse bada hath hai. Or waha se Jaati system turned into opressive system. Even women started getting exploited.
bhai jati vyavstha abhi to gai bhi nahi hai. jo bache hai unko bhi Islam kabool karwa ke manoge.
Bro i share similar thoughts
Lots of misinformation on Buddhism. Theravada does not favor the rich. In order to attain nirvana in theravada you must be a monk and give up all your wealth, titles and disown yourself from your family.
Correct ! Theravada is more stricter version did not appeal to everyone
You fail to mention that Kanishkar was a great patron of Buddhist and Hindu art, the Ayurveda and other Hindu developments. The caves were both Hindu and Buddhist and they developed on each other. Angkor Wat was also built by the South Indian Kings, who were responsible for the spread of Hindu Culture to Malaysia.
What's about great samudgupa and vikrmaditya😍😍
Hmm... He is the founder of mleccha caste system... Very discriminative... Especially for Javanese and Sundanese (Java), Saka (Aji Saka/Ajivaka, Javanese and Sundanese's ancestor), Malaya (Melayu/Malay), and Kamboja-Champa ethnicities... That's why we refused our ancestor to categorized as Hindu (Indian Hinduism)... The term Shiva-Buddhist religion, or Shiva religion, or Kapitayan/Aji Saka/Ajivaka religion is more neutral...
I am thankful for bringing India and south east Asian history. Most channels focus only on China and Japan when history of India is very unique and influenced places from Afghanistan to Japan. India also indirectly affected the history of the Americas as the Europeans were originally searching for sea routes to India.
for such a short video trying to cover very dense and wide range of topic, this vido are a good general overview. Ofcourse the claims that are appear here some are debatable, so watch these kind of video with grain of salt and read more if you want to have a better undersatanding of history. anyaway, great content
in Indonesia, its not 'Indian Islands", it was Hindia Islands, the westerners cant speak the word 'H', thus it became 'Indian Islands'
Hind is another name for India. Sindh=Hind=India .. all arise from river Indus.
Southern was not ruled bit plundered by islamic forces but still ruled by Southern hindu kings. Priest is for hindus what is Imam is for muslims.
Maybe that's for Indian. For Indonesian (especially Javanese and Sundanese), we have raja-resi/begawan or senapati ing alaga panatagama concept. Raja/king also act as panatagama/religious leader. This system adopted by Mataram Islam Sultanate (the largest Islamic empire in Southeast Asia) till today...
Indian kings were busy enforcing caste rules on people and fighting among themselves naturally other united powers defeated them
Tell that too the Tamils 🐅🫡
And then a abhramic religion came and expanded their so called peace and so called concept of creator aka god 😒😒😒😒
😮😮😮 look at your history dung eating and women burning were such progressive things😮😮😮😮
Love your work!!!
There are a lot of flaws in these video.
Thank you.
Very nice instructions, lots of information, thank you very much. Want to know a lot about India. Very beautiful and full of motherhood ,very close country to all of us, our India. Mother of all. Thanks again.Stay well.
India still has a tumour .
The cancer of islam
@@preetamyadav7952 yogi ji ukhad ke fekege iss tumour ko insha-allah
@@rishabhsingh6023 ghar wapsi karwao .
Netao ka kaam nhi ye
wow how comfortably you have omitted the Pala and Sena dynasties of Bengal, and the Bengal Sultanate that had defeated delhi on numerous occassions … some of the biggest ever in South Asia
It's not his fault ... cBSE board is hindi belt board.
Somehow, entire north-east is ignored as if all channels are run by Indian National Congress.
U have only cover 1% percent of medival india... indian history starts from tamil country... chola empire. - the golden age of India ...
CORRECTION: \THE Arab/Muslim TRADE IN India WAS RELATIVELY PEACEFUL. 'THE vicious, barbaric Islamic invasions were not Arab, they were Turkic, Uzbek, Afghan. ALSO: Genghis Khan never invaded India, He could, but did not. there is much speculation why, one of the most prominent being that India was the holy land and he was Buddhist. \the primary reasons for the ghazni and other Islamic invasion was to plunder and loot mostly the temples. Your account is far too sketchy....
What nonsense .... delhi sultanate had it's empire mostly in north-india as delhi it's capital that's why it's called delhi sultanate but that doesn't mean other empires didn't exits. In south vijayanagara, last of cholas empires, in east kalinga, in north eastern ahom dynasty ruled predominantly.
The only moslim ruler who ruled 90% of indian subcontinent was tyrant aurangzeb untill subdued by maratha empire 1674-1818.
The maratha empire was the last large hindu empire & mainly responsible for the fall of mughals.
Why is there no mention of rajendra chola ……how sad ….???
Sorry but whoever told you that Theravada is was only reserved for a class was false…because the real teachings of Buddha is Theravada….not Mahayana…no one is restricted from Theravada ever….the Mahayana Buddhist monks at the start delve more with human affairs and more attached to material things and are therefore considered not really as strict as Theravada…just for real info purpose….not to stir any arguments….the 10 purities of monks are not followed by Mahayana monks as strictly as Theravada Monks…but enlightenment depends on one’s effort despite any titles of which branch of religion we are in…
Hinduism was always dominant in India
Ram not krishna
after all, the bramana theory is full of paradoxes which say that it was Indians who brought Dharma teachings to Indonesia, Indians are people who really avoid the sea, let alone a brahmana, a brahmana can't go to faraway places right? look at the eoic Ramayana there it is said that when Srirama wanted to go to Alenka (Sirlangka) instead he used a ship but he built a bridge! and the culture of Indians is a culture not of people who like to go to sea, especially when they sail to faraway places like Indonesia, that's a stupid theory! different from the Indonesian Malays they are great seafarers who have been proven! look at the people of Madagascar they are descendants of Indonesian sailors. I think what makes the most sense is that the ancient Indonesian Malays first sailed to India and studied Dharma teachings in India after that they established kingdoms with Hindu-Buddhist motifs.
Great explanation ,thank you
It's time waste
There are Three kind of people in the world Hebrews Gentiles and Palistinians. Israel and Pilipino are the Hebrew through Eber have 2 son Peleg and Joktan where the Israel and Pilipino came from
Your concept of calling Buddhism and Sikhism as different religions is flawed and shows your lack of understanding of either of these religions
One thing should be mentioned is that kushans were not Buddhists,They were mostly hindus and some of them followed mix iranian greek religion
Harrapan/bacterian is more Sumerian/Iranian in heritage than indian.
Just like the horse that was introduced to india, so as well other cultures.
Vedic hymns are technically Babylonian (the way they are structured) in nature.
What evidence do you have? I know the scholarship on India and Sanskrit, the two hundred years history of Indolgy.
Indus Valley Civilization was never in Bactria. Also they worshipped Lord Shiva (Pashupati Seal). They were ethnically Indian Dravidians
@@indiafirst3676 so Oxus and harrapan never really had a connection….
Look at the geography, also look the zargos and persia.
@@snakeeater0224 IVC was never in Bactria except for a Trading Colony called Shortugai. It wasn't a site of IVC
@@indiafirst3676 Pashupati seal looks Elamite…meaning trade or trade center created certain civilizations.
IVC is more related to zargos mountain and Persian cultures compare to southern india.
There was no india at that time, and Oxus is much further away from sumeria than harrapan culture, meaning cultures from sumeria went as far to the Oxus river.
So most likely it influenced the IVC.
One theory is gypsies-indo-European-Canaanites a one in the same.
Javan +62LAND 💀
Quite a shame they still lost to a handful of Britishers.😂😂
Intelligence beats marbles and diamond.
Imagine china not being a communist state. The religious ranking would be quite effected.
Indonesia have the first & biggest communist party in Asia long time before other Asian country did but still don't affect their religion
@@itsvan5791 To my knowledge muslim are most against atheism. So , not surprised that it is incorporated into the muslim communist doctrine. Besides, China's ccp has full authoritarian control for over half a century and wary on religion stealing away their influences on the mass.