🔴 When Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) was asked of his opinion of the one who says i do not know whether Allaah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens or on the earth, Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) said: He has disbelieved, because Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) says: “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne”, and His Throne is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) seven heavens. He was then asked, what if he said that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Throne but he does not know whether the Throne is in the heavens or on the earth he said, he has disbelieved. because he has denied that He (subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens [Quoted in Al-Uluww of Adh»Dhahabi, also in Sharh Aqeedah At»Tahawiyyah of Ibn Abi AI-lzz AI»Hanafi] 🔴 lmaam Malik (Rahimahullah) said when replying to the one who asked, ‘How did Allah make lstawaa? (Ascension above the Throne), Al-lstawaa is Known, and its how is unknown, to have faith in it is obligatory, and to question it is an innovation.” Then he said to the questioner, “i do not think except that you are an innovator” and he ordered him to be expelled. [Quoted in AI-Asmaa was Sifaat’ Page #.516] 🔴 Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said: The belief that I am upon, and I saw Our Companions, the Ashab-ul- Hadith (People of hadith) - like Imaam Malik and Sufvan and others - to be upon is: Affirming the testimony that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) and that Muhammad (Sal-Allahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) is the Messenger of Allah. And that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His Throne. above His heaven. He comes close to His creation howsoever He Wills, and He (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Descends to the lowest heaven howsoever He Wills. [Quoted in ‘Awn aI-Ma’bood’ (13/41), and ibn Abu Ya’la reports it in ‘Tabaqaat aI»Hanaabilaa‘ (1/283) with a chain of narration linked back to lmaam Ash-Shafi’ee.) Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said on another occasion: “To Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) belong Names and Attributes that occur in His Book and His Prophet informed to the nation. It is not possible for anyone to refute (radd) them. So the one who contradicts this after the evidence has been established against him then he is a kafir (disbeliever), and as for before the establishment of the proof then he is excused due to ignorance, because the knowledge of that cannot be attained through the intellect. So we affirm these Attributes and we negate tashbeeh (likening Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) to creation) as Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) negated it by saying, ‘there is nothing like Him.”‘ [Quoted in ‘Siyar A’Iaam an-Nubalaa’ (10/80)] 🔴 lmaam Ahmad (Rahimahullah) was asked: “Allah is above the seventh heaven, above His Throne. distinct from his creation, and His Power and Knowledge are in every place?” He (Rahimahullah) replied: Yes. above the Throne and His Knowledge is in every place (Quoted in Sharh Usool ilal‘tiqaad]
If someone visualise the Essence of Allah, the problem is with their brains. None of the Ahlul Athar, imagine Allah with any form. IT'S YOUR MIND that's imagining Allah with a FORM. We firmly believe in ليس كمثله شيء
Alot of them, put words into ahl sunnah's mouth, we dont give Allah a form, or body, we just affirm what Allah said, and what his rasool said. if we are literalist because of this, then so be it.
M A A mobile phone also has a face , does this mean the face of a mobile phone is the same as a humans face? No. We affirm what Allah said and we don’t liken him to his creation at all.
@M A Why does something with a face HAVE to include arms and legs? That is a fallacy. A watch has a face, it has hands, does it need to have legs as well? Does it need to have a GI tract like humans? No. We use these words to describe things, a face does not need to include cheeks, a jaw, teeth, etc.
At-Tahawi clearly stated that "Whoever attributes a humanlike attribute to Allah is a kafir". In the introduction of his book on aqidah, where this statement comes from, he said "This is an elucidation of the creed of ahlus_sunnah wal-jama'ah". This is the real judgment. It applies to any anthropomorphist, famous or not. I do not know why people keep tiptoeing around the issue of ibn Taymiyyah. Be brave and uphold the truth.
We have a will and Allah has a will, we have life and so does Allah, we have sight and so does Allah, the Jahmiyyah or Ismailiya took their negation to an extreme and said saying Allah existing is anthroprmorphic and so employed Allah exists and also doesn't exist, in order to avoid likening it, so really I recommend doing your own research
We Salafis firmly believe in what Allah himself says about himself - Allah's hands, feet, eyes, face. But we don't ask " HOW " or we never compare to any creation. Allah says, we believe and we stop there. we never compare to crearion. Because, Quran in 42:11 says - Nothing is similar, comparable to Allah. But we believe those ayats ( hands, feet, eyes, face) as is written in the Quran. You are thinking anthropomorphism. Quran 3:7- mohkam (clear)ayats, mutasabihat ayats ( unclear). But, we must believe all, every ayats, every types of ayats of the Quran without any question, if we want to be Muslim.
@kausartrouser They dont really contradict each other. Shaykh Abdur Rahman argues that these schools of theology didnt exist during the times of companions etc. Mufti Ibn Yusuf says schools of theology developed and had to be developed when muslims came across new ideas such as greek philosophy etc . Common muslims wer confused and scholars such as Imam Al Ghazali and many others had to refute these people while basing ther arguments on the Quran and Sunnah. Was this neccesary? I think it was.
WOW thank you brother that really touched my soul- really appreciated that i could be of service, may Allah Bless you and your family and give us the patience and iman to see our beloved Prophet Muhammed P.B.U.H!
أهل السنة والجماعة: يعرفون ربهم بصفاته الواردة في القرآن والسنة، ويصفون ربهم بما وصف به نفسه، وبما وصفه به رسوله صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم ولا يحرفون الكلم عن مواضعه، ولا يلحدون في أسمائه وآياته، ويثبتون لله ما أثبته لنفسه من غير تمثيل، ولا تكييف ولا تعطيل، ولا تحريف، وقاعدتهم في كل ذلك قول الله تبارك وتعالى: لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ البَصِيرُ [الشورى:11]وقوله:وَلِلَّهِ الأسماء الْحُسْنَى فَادْعُوهُ بِهَا وَذَرُوا الَّذِينَ يُلْحِدُونَ فِي أَسْمَائِهِ سَيُجْزَوْنَ مَا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ [الأعراف:180] وأهل السنة والجماعة: لا يحددون كيفية صفات الله - جل وعلا - لأنه تبارك وتعالى لم يخبر عن الكيفية، ولأنه لا أحد أعلم من الله سبحانه بنفسه، قال تعالى: قُلْ أَأَنْتُمْ أَعْلَمُ أَمْ اللَّهُ [البقرة:140]وقال تعالى: فَلا تَضْرِبُوا لِلَّهِ الأَمْثَالَ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يَعْلَمُ وَأَنْتُمْ لا تَعْلَمُونَ [النحل:74] ولا أحد أعلم بالله من رسوله صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم الذي قال الله تبارك وتعالى في حقه: وَمَا يَنْطِقُ عَنْ الْهَوَى إِنْ هُوَ إِلاَّ وَحْيٌ يُوحَى[النجم:4] وأهل السنة والجماعة: يؤمنون بأن المؤمنين يرون ربهم في الآخرة بأبصارهم، ويزورونه، ويكلمهم ويكلمونه، قال تعالى: وُجُوهٌ يَوْمَئِذٍ نَّاضِرَةٌ إِلَى رَبِّهَا نَاظِرَةٌ [القيامة:23] وسوف يرونه كما يرون القمر ليلة البدر لا يضامون في رؤيته، كما قال النبي صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم: ((إنكم سترون ربكم كما ترون القمر ليلة البدر، لا تضامون في رؤيته)) رواه البخاري (554)، ومسلم (633). من حديث جرير بن عبد الله رضي الله عنه قال: كنا عند النبى صلى الله عليه وسلم فنظر إلى القمر ليلة -يعنى البدر- فقال: (إنكم سترون ربكم كما ترون هذا القمر لا تضامون في رؤيته،. ..) فمنهج أهل السنة والجماعة في كل ذلك الإيمان الكامل بما أخبر به الله تعالى، وأخبر به رسوله صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم والتسليم به؛ كما قال الإمام الزهري رحمه الله تعالى: من الله الرسالة وعلى الرسول البلاغ وعلينا التسليم وكما قال الإمام سفيان بن عيينة رحمه الله تعالى: (كل ما وصف الله تعالى به نفسه في القرآن فقراءته تفسيره لا كيف، ولا مثل) وكما قال الإمام الشافعي رحمه الله تعالى: (آمنت بالله، وبما جاء عن الله على مراد الله، وآمنت برسول الله وبما جاء عن رسول الله على مراد رسول الله) وقال الوليد بن مسلم: سألت الأوزاعي، وسفيان بن عيينة، ومالك بن أنس عن هذه الأحاديث في الصفات والرؤية، فقالوا: (أمروها كما جاءت بلا كيف) وقال الإمام مالك بن أنس - إمام دار الهجرة - رحمه الله: إياكم والبدع قيل: وما البدع؟ قال: أهل البدع هم الذين يتكلمون في أسماء الله وصفاته وكلامه وعلمه وقدرته، ولا يسكتون عما سكت عنه الصحابة والتابعون لهم بإحسان وسأله رجل عن قوله تعالى: الرَّحْمَنُ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ اسْتَوَى كيف استوى؟ فقال: الاستواء غير مجهول، والكيف غير معقول، والإيمان به واجب، والسؤال عنه بدعة، وما أراك إلا ضالاً، وأمر به أن يخرج من المجلس وقال الإمام أبو حنيفة رحمه الله تعالى: لا ينبغي لأحد أن ينطق في ذات الله بشيء؛ بل يصفه بما وصف به نفسه، ولا يقول فيه برأيه شيئاً؛ تبارك الله تعالى رب العالمين ولما سئل - رحمه الله - عن صفة النزول، فقال: ينزل بلا كيف. وقال الحافظ الإمام نعيم بن حماد الخزاعي رحمه الله: من شبه الله بخلقه فقد كفر، ومن أنكر ما وصف به نفسه فقد كفر، وليس ما وصف به نفسه ولا رسوله تشبيها وقال بعض السلف: قدم الإسلام لا تثبت إلا على قنطرة التسليم لذا فإنه من سلك مسلك السلف في الحديث عن ذات الله تعالى وصفاته، يكون ملتزماً بمنهج القرآن في أسماء الله وصفاته سواء كان السالك في عصر السلف، أو في العصور المتأخرة وكل من خالف السلف في منهجهم؛ فلا يكون ملتزماً بمنهج القرآن، وإن كان موجوداً في عصر السلف، وبين أظهر الصحابة والتابعين
bachi kamal strong language can you put that exact same ruling to these people who said Allah azawajal has a hand he sees and hears. حَدَّثَنَا الْقَاسِمُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا هُرَيْرَةَ، يَقُولُ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِنَّ اللَّهَ يَقْبَلُ الصَّدَقَةَ وَيَأْخُذُهَا بِيَمِينِهِ فَيُرَبِّيهَا لأَحَدِكُمْ كَمَا يُرَبِّي أَحَدُكُمْ مُهْرَهُ حَتَّى إِنَّ اللُّقْمَةَ لَتَصِيرُ مِثْلَ أُحُدٍ " . وَتَصْدِيقُ ذَلِكَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ (وهُوَ الَّذِي يَقبَلُ التَّوبَةَ عَنْ عِبَادِهِ ) ويَأْخُذُ الصَّدَقَاتِ (يَمْحَقُ الله الرَّبَا ويُرْبِي الصَّدَقَاتِ) (...) Qasim ibn Muhammad said that he heard from Abu Hurayrah (radiyallahu anh) narrated that Rasulullah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) said: Indeed Allah accepts charity, and He accepts it with His Right (Hand) to nurture it for one of you, just like one of you would nurture his foal, until the bite (of food) becomes as large as Uhud. The Book of Allah Azza wa Jalla (the Mighty and Sublime) testifies to that: "He accepts repentance from His worshipers, and accepts charity." (at-Tawbah 9/104) And: "Allah will destroy Ribaa (interest) and will give increase for charity." (al-Baqarah 2/276).” After narrating this Hadith, Imam Tirmidhi said: هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ. وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنْ عَائِشَةَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَحْوُ هَذَا. وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}. This Hadith is Hasan Sahih. It has been reported from Aishah (radiyallahu anha) from Nabi (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) similarly. It has been stated by more than one person from the people of knowledge regarding this Hadith, and about the likes of it from the narrations concerning the Attributes, and that Rabb (Lord), Tabaraka wa Ta’ala (the Most Blessed, the Most High), Descends to the lowest heaven of this world every night. They said: Affirm the narrations concerning them; have faith in them; do not imagine them; nor ask how they are. The likes of this has been reported from Malik ibn Anas, Sufyaan ibn Uyaynah and Abdullah ibn al-Mubaarak. They said concerning these Ahadith: Leave them as they are, without asking how they are. This is the saying of the people of knowledge from Ahl’us Sunnah wa'l Jamaa'ah. As for the Jahmiyyah, then they reject these narrations and say that this is Tashbih (resemblance). However, Allah Azza wa Jall (the Most High) has mentioned in various places in His Book (His Attribute of) al-Yad (Hand); as-Sam (Hearing) and al-Basir (Seeing), but the Jahmiyyah give a Ta'wil (figurative interpretation) to these verses and explain it in a manner other than how it is explained by the people of knowledge. They say: Indeed, Allah did not create Adam (alayhi salam) with His Hand. They say: Indeed, the Hand (of Allah) actually means His Power! Ishaq ibn Ibrahim said: Tashbih (resemblance) is when someone says the Hand (of Allah) is like my hand, or His Hearing is like my hearing. So if someone says this, then this is resemblance. But if someone says what Allah says, Hand, Hearing, Seeing; and he does not ask how these (Attributes) are, nor does he say that Allah's Hearing is like my hearing, then this is not resemblance. Rather, it just like what Allah Ta’ala (the Most Blessed, the Most High), said in His Book: "There is none like Him; He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing." (ash-Shura 42/11) (Tirmidhi, Jami Sunan, #662)
I get very confused sometimes because I am Athari, but I'm not Salafi...Why when most Asharis discuss the differences their is almost never a distinguishing on traditional Hanbali/Atharia and modern Salafist. Do the Ashari not believe traditionalist who follow Hanbali in Fiqh and Athari in Creed to be rightly guided? I was not taught to see the words as literal but simply confirming the words without reinterpretung them or asking how.
there are countlesss hadeeth proving Allah's hands and Face, and Ibn taymiyya did not believe Allah had a hand like his creation. Rather there is no likeness in the Hands of Allah to his creation. nor his glorious face. The key is laysa kamithlihi shay.
No matter how many times we say to these Sufis. They'd always blame us, the Ahlul Athar, to be Mujassimah while we are the ones who purely do radd of Mujassimah ☝️
*You are a mushriq believing Allah is a body, a murtad, and deserve the apostasy punishment in the Caliphate infront of a Qadi, unless you repent, so better keep quiet, you are a danger to this Ummah, and invoking the Fire on them with your Wahhabe kufr of the najdi mushriqeen*
when the Salaf believed in those verse of Quran and they did not delve in the meaning, then when Ashari and Maturidi make tawil and interpret those verses based on their own thinking. Allah sent Quran to guide mankind not to misguide them or make them anthropomorphic. What was the creed of Muslim before Ashari/Mturidi?
"in a manner that befits his Majesty" is just another form of Ta'wil. "A hand but not like our hands" is affirming the word but not the literal meaning of the word, which is ta'wil, except a dumb ta'wil compared to the ta'wil of Asharis and Maturidis.
@TheHaroon786786 Imam Abul hasan Ashary - born - 260/270 Hijry, died - 324 Hijry Imam abu monsur Maturidy - born - disputed, 247 Hijry died - 333 Hijry. Imam Ashary was MUTAJILA in early life. Then changed his ideas- invented Ashary aqeeda,.Finally, before his death - Imam Ashary did tauba, repented and accepted Salafi aqeeda. Imam Maturidy actually Ashary aqeeda with certain differences. Were muslims ( sahaba, tabeyin, tabe-tabeyin, 4 Imams, Hadiths writers, 4 khalifas) ignorant about Aqeeda before the coming of Imam Ashary, Imam Maturidy? ( naujubillah). Quran 5:7( paraphrased) - today, I ( Allah) has perfected your religion ( Islam), and has completed my favour upon you. So, we don't need the innovation ( bidat) of explaining Allah's names attributes with Greek philosophy. Remember - Quran 3:7- some ayats - mohkam(clear) some ayats - mutasabihat(unclear), but we must believe in all ayats without hesitation to be muslim.
Muslims before Ashary -Maturidy were all SALAFIS. Except rare exception of Jahmia, Qaderia, murjia, mutajila, Shia, khareji etc. Ashary -maturidy aqeeda began after 300 Hijry.
@5:08 Mufti saab mistakenly said they attribute a human like form of face and hand even after explaining a few seconds earlier that they said its not like a human form, If its Allah's speech in the quran we can't discard it so sometimes you have to go there to try and understand. The word face shouldn't be limited to 2 eyes, nose and a mouth e.g. we have a clock face which has 2 hands but we don't attribute a human like form to it.
u can say that to Maturidi ask well...... The point is that the Salaf(First three Generations of Companions,students,etc... after the Prophet{pbuh}) view on Philosophy or Kalam on Quran is dont try to Interpret something when u CANT give 100% Certainty?
Tabishe Arshad Even in English the word hand has 7 meanings, so which meaning are you affirming for Allah since you claim the meaning is clear just not the how.
@@linoazzurro No we don't say appendage, we don't say limb or any other words, do you know why? Because we don't use words that Allah hasn't used. We just affirn the texts based upon their apparent meaning. It means something that holds. Thats one of the meanings of Yad. I can prove to you easily that Yad means that above from the Qur'an itself and also from the narrations of the Salaf. All of the 4 Imams affirmed it. Tell me however what do you say that Yad is?
When I converted from christianity to islam and read about the 'hands' or 'face' of Allah I just continued reading knowing that the meaning could not be taken literal. Years later I found out the diffirent theologies and realized that the Salafi/Athari theology comes closest to the antropomorphicism in Christianity.
Until one become stupid - blind - deaf and dumb - not given a life and then given a second of life and then tries to express Allah, he will fail to describe Him. At least he tried but failed. Just don't share your opinion with others. Why? Because the opinion came from of person of a stupid, blind, deaf, dumb that requires one second of life to live. Even if you get the answer, stop telling how God looks like.😊Laisa ka mithli hi - probably means nothing is like him and you saw him devoid of example😂.
For those misunderstanding below, the Mufti in the video is talking about the history of the arguments that developed in the scholars of the past. He is also clarrifying the difference between the saudi salafis and the actual historical first 3 generations of Muslims. Possibly, saudi salafis have changed their views today but Mufti is describing the early saudi salafi views.
It is He who has sent down to you, [O Muḥammad], the Book; in it are verses [that are] precise - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific.1 As for those in whose hearts is deviation [from truth], they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation [suitable to them]. And no one knows its [true] interpretation except Allāh. But those firm in knowledge say, "We believe in it. All [of it] is from our Lord." And no one will be reminded except those of understanding. 3:7
once again, the hypocracy of the hashawiya abounds. its ok to slander any of the a'immah they wish, but say uff against ibn taymiya, albani, or bin baz and they breathe fire from their snouts. TYPICAL
@infinitedimension1 because that is the true 'aqeedah of the Salaf, that Allaah has a face, hand, feet, fingers, that Allaah runs, laughs, smiles etc. but remember "laysa kamithlihee shay"
but if you cant do that then apply a figurative interpretation that Imam Ashari R.A provided e.g. Yad (hand) has 25 different meaning as oppossed to a literal hand itself e.g. power, domain, control. I hoped that helped brother-Salaam
The safest point is to believe that we leave it to Allah. Only Allah knows about his attributes well. Human mind can't capture these. We only just listen & believe.
Allah said He has a Hand, He has a face. Then we affirmed it as He said without asking 'HOW' without misinterpreting it to other meanings, without likening His attributes to His Creatures. This is the way of the Salaf. Other than that is going astray!
@@blackflag6976 that's حكم عام and not حكم خاص? How can someone claim to be muslim when they don't believe in any sahaba, ratherthey curse the sahaba and umm Al momineen,
@@Asad-gv9in Belief in the sahaba is not one of the 6 articles of faith. It makes them a faasiq but not disbelievers. Btw most shias dont curse the sahaba. Khamenei specifically published a fatwa prohibiting it
@@blackflag6976 cursing sahaba is not what made them kuffar (حكم عام) , grave worshipping, asking Ali and Hussain etc. Also, really appreciate the civil conversation we are having, alot of people start mocking each other, punching etc.
MashaALLAH... Brothers ALL Sifat of ALLAH in the Qur-an are TRUE, we must believe it but REFRAIN from liking it to anything.ALLAH IS LAYSA KA MITHLI SAYYE'...
@@abubeast8816 why do u keep disputing wen haqq is clear...would u say that majority of ummah is wrong and have deviated?this goes against the prophecy and promised of Allah and his messanger saw...
very true akhi, regardless, may Allah guide them, they are lost in regards to this aspect of the deen, which is most important, CREED, AQEEDAH, this religion is perfected for them,
Has anyone seen Allaah, Himself (ذاته او نفسه)? Can we describe how Allaah looks like? Obviously the answer will be 'NO'. so are His attributes (صفات), actions (أفعال) and whatever He said about Himself. Allaah knows Himself better than us.
Some of his attributes are manifested in the creation like wen u look at how Allah shaped different fruits ,trees animals etc ...Allah is the shaper of beauty
I really find it to hard to believe that taking the names and attributes of Allah for their apparent meaning is a cause of deviation. Rather the opposite is true, i.e. making taweel or tafweed is a cause of deviation.
Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem says Ashari and Maturidi aqeedah is problematic because it's based on "conviction" . I did not agree with him. I have stopped listening to him. But still i don't understand what he meant
Please ask the sheikh about this fatwa. Is it authentic ? al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya: “It is okay for a man to see from his mother, mature daughter, sister and all other Mahram women such as grandmothers, grandchildren, paternal and maternal aunts, at their: hair, chest, locks, breasts, forearms (shoulders) and shins. It is not permissible to look at their back, stomach and the area between the navel and (including the) knees.”(Al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya, 5/328)
He is a liar, in minute 1:08, he did not read the full ayah and did not mention the continuation: لبسكَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ ۖ *(وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِير)ُ* "He is the All Hearing and All Seeing" So, while Allah is the *"All Hearing and All Seeing"* Allah Almighty's "Hearing and Seeing" is not and can never be the same as human's hearing and seeing, for human's attribute is limited, while Allah's attributes is boundless and unlimited. To accuse one of anthromorphism like the speaker did is only reflective of his igorance of the deen. The companions, the tabien, the tabi' tabien, the Four Great Imams; Abu Haneefah, Malik, Ashafie and the last of them, Imam Ahmad (d.260hijrah), never did takwil of the sifats (attributes), *but took them literally from the quran and the authenticated hadiths*, thus the quetion of anthromorphism did not arise from among them. The accusation of anthromorphism was first introduced into islam by the Jahmites (Jahm ibn Safwan) , Muktazilah and became widespread during the Neo Ashaaris era in the 7th century of the Hijrah calendar. The early Ahlussunnah scholars, as early as the second century (hijrah) used to refute these new philosophical approach towards "takwil" of the Attributes (Sifat) saying, "If anyone who accused those whose belief in Allah include Allah's Attributes as mentioned in the Quran and the authenticated Sunnah, *know that the one who accused is a Jahmite, for only one who had first imagined the Attributes (Allah's a.z) to be similar to his ownself, thinking that these attributes are similar to his, thus he has committed anthromorphism (likening Allah to his creations), thence requiring him to reject the attributes. In other words, Only *a Muattilah (those who reject Allah's attributes)* would accuse the Ahlussunnah (Those who accepted Allah's Attributes without takwil) of Anthromorphism, i.e. One first had to imagine that Allah's hand is like his hand, so that is why he had to reject (or make takwil) of the Attributes. wallahu a'lam.
so will the believers not see Allah in Jannah, with all due respect, the Ashari and Maturidi, are clearly misguided in these aspects. return to the Sunnah
0:53 Atharis like Hanbali never believe in "Mujasima" Anthropology. Here Sheikh it seems you should clarity, who are the Mujasima. For surely Atharis are not. Atharis does know "Laysa ka misliHi shai" "They say BilLa KayFiyah"
Dont give it a literal meaning...just read it and say only Allah knows wat he meant by that...and remeber there is nothing like unto him...nothing ressemble Allah...He(royalty) is unique
no accept what that verse say but dont apply a literal meaning to it e.g. hand- in other words read it and accept it but dont go beyond that e.g.God has a hand (a thumb, four fingers and a palm by definition)-because it contradicts the very verse your trying to follow 'theirs NOTHING like him' (nothing our minds can imagine) and we would be 'creating similitudes for Allah' 16:74 (comparing Allah to his creation)- by saying he has a HAND which by definition is '4 fingers a palm and fingers'.
I wonder, does Allaah introduce himself to us with words that we don't understand or with words that can take one to KUFR if they are understood as they appear. Why did Allaah want to confuse us.
@@falsamehabsame3268 It actually doesnt in LITERAL sense the earth is in orbit around the Sun and the Moon. Although we use the words rise and set for our understanding. It's a metaphoric, so when Allah swt uses those words to describe himself it's so he can speak to us so we can understand the Ayah. Allah swt doesnt need you to be literal of it and give him forms and shapes. Hope thos helps
You follow your Aql(intelligence) before Naql(revealed text) that's why Jahmiyyah & Ashaa'irah & all those misguided misguided they fall into this trap, because they were influenced by the Greek philosophies . You think your something, you are a critical thinker by placing your Aql over what Allah revealed? Huh You are the mushahbihaat you are imagining anthropomorphic qualities to Him when we just affirm what He affirmed of His attributes in Quran. We don't describe it 'How' yes Allah has a face but we don't try imagine it as resembling any of His Creatures. He is most perfect. Also He has other attributes He didn't mentioned in the Qur'an. As for other attributes didn't mentioned in Quran we never negate that we just stop it there & affirm what He affirmed in the book.
It’s not necessary for schoolers to entertain those fitna, because it won’t stop. You can’t prove beliefs with theology, at extreme they will go ask prove who created Allah. And you will stop proving answers like he is uncreated. So it’s the first principal of being Muslim to have faith in Allah and leave unanswered questions to him. No one is forcing anyone to believe Islam and everyone is welcome to leave. So my final point is don’t innovate like Maturidi did. Doesn’t work and it failes at some point
sheikh Asrar is Indian hanafi Berelvi. What debate? Before 300 Hijry, no Ashary- Maturidy aqeeda. So, were Sahabas, Tabeyin, Tabe-tabeyin, 4 khalifas, 4 Imams ignorant about Aqeeda ( naujubillah)? What debate? Ashary- Maturidy Aqeeda is an innovation ( BIDATI) Aqeeda. We, Salafs don't need debate with Bidati people.
Yeah well he lied, he said that we give Allah "a body" or "human" form thats not whatvwe say we merely affirm what Allah said about himself Allah has a face, Allah has two eyes, Allah has 2 right hands Allah has a shin, but we also affirm there is nothing like unto him and you cannot even imagine Allah. A simple example is this, a chair has legs and hands, but does the chair resemble human legs? Or animal legs, no
@@sohailhashmi4455 Wahhabi means follower of Abdul wahhab najdi, the takfiri extremist. Asharis and Maturidis follow the text. They are upon sunnah, though they may not be a 100% spot on.
@@blackflag6976 u are delusional. First of all no one calls themselves wahabi, and ashari and maturidi dont follow text, you dont even know what you talk??? You do taweel which means explaining texts through philisophy. Atharis follow text as it is.
@@aaquib2010 No one calls themselves Rafidhi or Khawarij either. The same goes for wahhabis. They are what they are. And to be more specific, its the madkhalis who are the most sectarian, intolerant group within the wahhabis. Ofcourse Asharis and Maturidis follow the text, they just dont take all of it literally. Whats wrong with explaining it using philosophy? Its just logic.
This guys aqeeedah is screwed! May Allah save the innocent who study under him ! Allah said His wajj so it’s wajj it’s his face that’s it ! We dnt need this guy to give it a meaning ! So scary to listen to such
Scholars in saudi arabia, brother these wahabi government paid scholars are deviant, true scholars of ahlus sunnah are there in makkah and madinah .. Habib al jifri, abdullah bin bayyah,son of muhammad bin alawi al maliki etc etc
He doesn't even know anything about the aqida of ahla suna wal Jamma. If Allah said has hands, you should accept it but don't say what kind. Because No ones looks like him ( laysa kamisluhu shaya)
kuluku100 I agree with you Owen Wilson. If Allah said it and we cant grasp it, we leave it to Allah. But these sufis say that we claim Allah has human hands. Allah had has Allah's hands.
kuluku100 Do you know how stupid you sound. Allah has appendages? Does He have wrists not like our wrists as well? I used to be a wahabi so I know how ridiculous is this anthropomorphist's views.
This is kind of silly. Hand, face, throne, etc., are all analogies. They were expressed in poetic terms precisely so that we as human beings could understand their meaning. The Qur'an 3:3 clearly says metaphors are used in the revelation. So what's the problem? Just look at how throne was used in the Psalms or other scriptures. Throne was a metaphor for power and ultimate authority. It's 2018, much has been discovered in science. There's no throne or chair floating around in the sky.
حَدَّثَنَا الْقَاسِمُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا هُرَيْرَةَ، يَقُولُ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِنَّ اللَّهَ يَقْبَلُ الصَّدَقَةَ وَيَأْخُذُهَا بِيَمِينِهِ فَيُرَبِّيهَا لأَحَدِكُمْ كَمَا يُرَبِّي أَحَدُكُمْ مُهْرَهُ حَتَّى إِنَّ اللُّقْمَةَ لَتَصِيرُ مِثْلَ أُحُدٍ " . وَتَصْدِيقُ ذَلِكَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ (وهُوَ الَّذِي يَقبَلُ التَّوبَةَ عَنْ عِبَادِهِ ) ويَأْخُذُ الصَّدَقَاتِ (يَمْحَقُ الله الرَّبَا ويُرْبِي الصَّدَقَاتِ) (...) Qasim ibn Muhammad said that he heard from Abu Hurayrah (radiyallahu anh) narrated that Rasulullah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) said: Indeed Allah accepts charity, and He accepts it with His Right (Hand) to nurture it for one of you, just like one of you would nurture his foal, until the bite (of food) becomes as large as Uhud. The Book of Allah Azza wa Jalla (the Mighty and Sublime) testifies to that: "He accepts repentance from His worshipers, and accepts charity." (at-Tawbah 9/104) And: "Allah will destroy Ribaa (interest) and will give increase for charity." (al-Baqarah 2/276).” After narrating this Hadith, Imam Tirmidhi said: هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ. وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنْ عَائِشَةَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَحْوُ هَذَا. وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}. This Hadith is Hasan Sahih. It has been reported from Aishah (radiyallahu anha) from Nabi (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) similarly. It has been stated by more than one person from the people of knowledge regarding this Hadith, and about the likes of it from the narrations concerning the Attributes, and that Rabb (Lord), Tabaraka wa Ta’ala (the Most Blessed, the Most High), Descends to the lowest heaven of this world every night. They said: Affirm the narrations concerning them; have faith in them; do not imagine them; nor ask how they are. The likes of this has been reported from Malik ibn Anas, Sufyaan ibn Uyaynah and Abdullah ibn al-Mubaarak. They said concerning these Ahadith: Leave them as they are, without asking how they are. This is the saying of the people of knowledge from Ahl’us Sunnah wa'l Jamaa'ah. As for the Jahmiyyah, then they reject these narrations and say that this is Tashbih (resemblance). However, Allah Azza wa Jall (the Most High) has mentioned in various places in His Book (His Attribute of) al-Yad (Hand); as-Sam (Hearing) and al-Basir (Seeing), but the Jahmiyyah give a Ta'wil (figurative interpretation) to these verses and explain it in a manner other than how it is explained by the people of knowledge. They say: Indeed, Allah did not create Adam (alayhi salam) with His Hand. They say: Indeed, the Hand (of Allah) actually means His Power! Ishaq ibn Ibrahim said: Tashbih (resemblance) is when someone says the Hand (of Allah) is like my hand, or His Hearing is like my hearing. So if someone says this, then this is resemblance. But if someone says what Allah says, Hand, Hearing, Seeing; and he does not ask how these (Attributes) are, nor does he say that Allah's Hearing is like my hearing, then this is not resemblance. Rather, it just like what Allah Ta’ala (the Most Blessed, the Most High), said in His Book: "There is none like Him; He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing." (ash-Shura 42/11) (Tirmidhi, Jami Sunan, #662)
This guy has a very superficial view of the history and development of groups in thier Aqeedah. So far I have watched a few videos and he seems very much afraid of the Salafi's. Comes across very clear now.
Maturidi & Ashaira are deviant, no doubt about that. They are out of the fold of Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jammah. They reject Quranic verses. Why don't you get contentment on the word of Imam Malik. May Allah-swt guide you.
Nope even the conqueror of Constantinople and his army were ashari hanafi and sufi and was praised by the holy prophet saw...if u say majority muslims are misguided then u are going against rasulAllah prophecies and devine promise that majority will not go astray...modern salafi are not sunni ...where was your group before 200 year ago?nowhere everyone were ashari and maturidi for thousand of years ...u people definitely goes against the majority...plus even ahlul bayt are maturidi and ashari ...like sheickh mohammad al yaqubi ect he is 34 descendant of hazrat imam hassan ra...
The Maturidi and Ashari use of logic paved the way for innovative ideologies such as justifying grave worshipping, celebrating birthdays of the prophet. They have pushed the envelope of reason and logic so far that they've fallen off the cliff.
False. Grave worshipping is done even by shias who arent even from ashari/maturidi aqeedah. Celebrating birthdays is an issue of dispute. Many asharis dont do it either.
@@simplykudos5249 ne we didn't. We affirm what Allah and his prophet affirmed without any تكييف وتعطيل ونحوه. If you want to know the salafi position regarding asma wa siffat, the read the aqwal of imam malik
@@blackflag6976 that's what!!! The idea of grave worshipping was taken from the mushrikoon by the Shia, which eventually was taken by the asharis. Anyways these topics are very vast, and the comments don't do justice to it. Bottom line is that grave worshipping and milad are innovation which the sahaba s never did!
@@Asad-gv9in Grave worshipping is haraam and not a part of the Ashari creed, and it's prohibited in the hadith. Milaad is also not a part of the Ashari creed. However we can't say if it is haraam or not as there is no mention whether it's allowed or prohibited.
subhanallah so many flaws in this speech. for starters the people on the correct aqeedah only say take the OBVIOUS interpretation of the verses (which is how Allah describes himself). if Allah says he has hands then who are we to say 'no don't you dare interpret that'.. why are you Sufis complicating things?? you're making this religion hard on you.
BTW I respect this shaykh the same way he 'respects' shaykul Islam ibn taymiyyah. I take what is beneficial from him and does not corrode my aqeedah such as his adab as suhbah videos
For somebody to say Shaykhul Islam Taqi ud deen Ibn taymiyyah's is debatedable shows that this individual does not have the correct Aqeedah. SubhanALLAAH. Nobody in his time said he had the worng aqeedah or his aqeedah was debatable except the deviants of his time. We ask ALLAAH to guide this man and his false speech.
Why don’t you go to Makkah the foundation of Islam and learn your Aqeeda from them like of that of the salaf not maturidi you are a pure deobandi stop acting like you know more than scholars in Makkah It’s amazing how quickly you guys turn in to muftis and yet can’t practice simple Hadiths from bukhari in your life’s. Islam is not about turban and rejecting clear Hadiths from bukhari and Muslim. And stop projecting your ill Aqeeda on the book of Allah Allah the all wise knows what he is talking about if he said hand that what he meant if someone with ill heart wants to compare it human hands then he hasn’t understood the Quran or Allah.
You have to understand the circumstance and logic behind the matu. and ashar. school: In the time of the selef, they didnt interpret ayets, which described allah, because at this time nobody misunderstood those. The same reason why there were no mezheb, cause everything was clear without different oppinions. Yet it was clear, those ayets had a meaning in different ways (muteshabehat) but they just didnt touch it. After prophet died, slowly different opinions appeared, just like lieteral understanding of allah-describing ayets. So mezhebs evolved, who tried to explain what the prophet meant with the ayets and hadith. Nobody invented anything, they all had the logic 'in my research, i came to the conclusion that the prophet meant this and this with this ayet'. We cant compare ourselves to the selef, especialy to the sahabe, cause they didnt need big explanations cause they were there, when the prophet was alive. So you cant aply the logic 'i believe just like the sahabe' because you dont have the same undivided opinion source (the prophet himself). So its just normal that we are depending on those explanations of imam azam or imam maturidi. So its the logic 'They explain the kuran and sunnah for us'
This mufti must know that even in fiqh he made weird statements. He incorporated fiqh into Aqeedah matters which led to Takfeer. Thus such understandings by ibn Taymiyyah cause chaos in the Muslim nation. He is the father of terrorism in this ummah which is destructive. Yes, he was a scholar who became extremely philosophical and thus deviated.
🔴 When Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) was asked of his opinion of the one who says i do not know whether Allaah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens or on the earth,
Imaam Abu Haneefah (Rahimahullah) said:
He has disbelieved, because Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) says: “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne”, and His Throne is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) seven heavens.
He was then asked, what if he said that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Throne but he does not know whether the Throne is in the heavens or on the earth he said, he has disbelieved. because he has denied that He (subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above the heavens
[Quoted in Al-Uluww of Adh»Dhahabi, also in Sharh Aqeedah At»Tahawiyyah of Ibn Abi AI-lzz AI»Hanafi]
🔴 lmaam Malik (Rahimahullah) said when replying to the one who asked, ‘How did Allah make lstawaa? (Ascension above the Throne),
Al-lstawaa is Known, and its how is unknown, to have faith in it is obligatory, and to question it is an innovation.” Then he said to the questioner, “i do not think except that you are an innovator” and he ordered him to be expelled.
[Quoted in AI-Asmaa was Sifaat’ Page #.516]
🔴 Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said:
The belief that I am upon, and I saw Our Companions, the Ashab-ul- Hadith (People of hadith) - like Imaam Malik and Sufvan and others - to be upon is:
Affirming the testimony that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) and that Muhammad (Sal-Allahu ‘alayhe wa sallam) is the Messenger of Allah. And that Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) is above His Throne. above His heaven. He comes close to His creation howsoever He Wills, and He (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) Descends to the lowest heaven howsoever He Wills.
[Quoted in ‘Awn aI-Ma’bood’ (13/41), and ibn Abu Ya’la reports it in ‘Tabaqaat aI»Hanaabilaa‘ (1/283) with a chain of narration linked back to lmaam Ash-Shafi’ee.)
Imaam Ash-Shafi’ee (Rahimahullah) said on another occasion:
“To Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) belong Names and Attributes that occur in His Book and His Prophet informed to the nation. It is not possible for anyone to refute (radd) them. So the one who contradicts this after the evidence has been established against him then he is a kafir (disbeliever), and as for before the establishment of the proof then he is excused due to ignorance, because the knowledge of that cannot be attained through the intellect. So we affirm these Attributes and we negate tashbeeh (likening Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) to creation) as Allah (Subhaanahu wa ta’aala) negated it by saying, ‘there is nothing like Him.”‘
[Quoted in ‘Siyar A’Iaam an-Nubalaa’ (10/80)]
🔴 lmaam Ahmad (Rahimahullah) was asked: “Allah is above the seventh heaven, above His Throne. distinct from his creation, and His Power and Knowledge are in every place?”
He (Rahimahullah) replied:
Yes. above the Throne and His Knowledge is in every place
(Quoted in Sharh Usool ilal‘tiqaad]
Total misinterpretation and misrepresentation
He said he disbelieved because he believed Allah was bound by direction (His creation).
If someone visualise the Essence of Allah, the problem is with their brains. None of the Ahlul Athar, imagine Allah with any form. IT'S YOUR MIND that's imagining Allah with a FORM.
We firmly believe in ليس كمثله شيء
Explain TWO and laisa kamithlihi shai'..
If you listen to understand maybe you'll get somewhere..
Leave it as Mutashaabih and go on..
ua-cam.com/video/0gBSsOVwrCI/v-deo.html
Alot of them, put words into ahl sunnah's mouth, we dont give Allah a form, or body, we just affirm what Allah said, and what his rasool said. if we are literalist because of this, then so be it.
M A A mobile phone also has a face , does this mean the face of a mobile phone is the same as a humans face? No. We affirm what Allah said and we don’t liken him to his creation at all.
@M A
Salafi not sayings that dear brother. Mufti Sahib is giving very twist of Salafi explanation of Allah Paak's Name & Sifaat.
M A you can’t just say you believe in the Quran and the Hadiths and then reject some of them lol
@M A you are a takfiri!
@M A Why does something with a face HAVE to include arms and legs? That is a fallacy. A watch has a face, it has hands, does it need to have legs as well? Does it need to have a GI tract like humans? No. We use these words to describe things, a face does not need to include cheeks, a jaw, teeth, etc.
At-Tahawi clearly stated that "Whoever attributes a humanlike attribute to Allah is a kafir". In the introduction of his book on aqidah, where this statement comes from, he said "This is an elucidation of the creed of ahlus_sunnah wal-jama'ah". This is the real judgment. It applies to any anthropomorphist, famous or not. I do not know why people keep tiptoeing around the issue of ibn Taymiyyah. Be brave and uphold the truth.
We have a will and Allah has a will, we have life and so does Allah, we have sight and so does Allah, the Jahmiyyah or Ismailiya took their negation to an extreme and said saying Allah existing is anthroprmorphic and so employed Allah exists and also doesn't exist, in order to avoid likening it, so really I recommend doing your own research
@@mellohello3774 existence and a phyiscal body are different stories. our existence is dependend on allahs existence
We Salafis firmly believe in what Allah himself says about himself -
Allah's hands, feet, eyes, face.
But we don't ask " HOW " or
we never compare to any creation. Allah says, we believe and we stop there. we never compare to crearion. Because, Quran in 42:11 says -
Nothing is similar, comparable to Allah.
But we believe those ayats ( hands, feet, eyes, face) as is written in the Quran.
You are thinking anthropomorphism.
Quran 3:7- mohkam (clear)ayats, mutasabihat ayats ( unclear). But, we must believe all, every ayats, every types of ayats of the Quran without any question, if we want to be Muslim.
@kausartrouser
They dont really contradict each other. Shaykh Abdur Rahman argues that these schools of theology didnt exist during the times of companions etc. Mufti Ibn Yusuf says schools of theology developed and had to be developed when muslims came across new ideas such as greek philosophy etc . Common muslims wer confused and scholars such as Imam Al Ghazali and many others had to refute these people while basing ther arguments on the Quran and Sunnah. Was this neccesary? I think it was.
WOW thank you brother that really touched my soul- really appreciated that i could be of service, may Allah Bless you and your family and give us the patience and iman to see our beloved Prophet Muhammed P.B.U.H!
k W
@@faysaleladdouti8394🤦🏻♂️Really You are a Very Great Fool... Where did you get this conclusion 😂😂
أهل السنة والجماعة: يعرفون ربهم بصفاته الواردة في القرآن والسنة، ويصفون ربهم بما وصف به نفسه، وبما وصفه به رسوله صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم ولا يحرفون الكلم عن مواضعه، ولا يلحدون في أسمائه وآياته، ويثبتون لله ما أثبته لنفسه من غير تمثيل، ولا تكييف ولا تعطيل، ولا تحريف، وقاعدتهم في كل ذلك قول الله تبارك وتعالى:
لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ البَصِيرُ [الشورى:11]وقوله:وَلِلَّهِ الأسماء الْحُسْنَى فَادْعُوهُ بِهَا وَذَرُوا الَّذِينَ يُلْحِدُونَ فِي أَسْمَائِهِ سَيُجْزَوْنَ مَا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ [الأعراف:180]
وأهل السنة والجماعة: لا يحددون كيفية صفات الله - جل وعلا - لأنه تبارك وتعالى لم يخبر عن الكيفية، ولأنه لا أحد أعلم من الله سبحانه بنفسه، قال تعالى:
قُلْ أَأَنْتُمْ أَعْلَمُ أَمْ اللَّهُ [البقرة:140]وقال تعالى: فَلا تَضْرِبُوا لِلَّهِ الأَمْثَالَ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يَعْلَمُ وَأَنْتُمْ لا تَعْلَمُونَ [النحل:74] ولا أحد أعلم بالله من رسوله صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم الذي قال الله تبارك وتعالى في حقه: وَمَا يَنْطِقُ عَنْ الْهَوَى إِنْ هُوَ إِلاَّ وَحْيٌ يُوحَى[النجم:4]
وأهل السنة والجماعة: يؤمنون بأن المؤمنين يرون ربهم في الآخرة بأبصارهم، ويزورونه، ويكلمهم ويكلمونه، قال تعالى: وُجُوهٌ يَوْمَئِذٍ نَّاضِرَةٌ إِلَى رَبِّهَا نَاظِرَةٌ [القيامة:23]
وسوف يرونه كما يرون القمر ليلة البدر لا يضامون في رؤيته، كما قال النبي صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم: ((إنكم سترون ربكم كما ترون القمر ليلة البدر، لا تضامون في رؤيته))
رواه البخاري (554)، ومسلم (633). من حديث جرير بن عبد الله رضي الله عنه قال: كنا عند النبى صلى الله عليه وسلم فنظر إلى القمر ليلة -يعنى البدر- فقال: (إنكم سترون ربكم كما ترون هذا القمر لا تضامون في رؤيته،. ..)
فمنهج أهل السنة والجماعة في كل ذلك الإيمان الكامل بما أخبر به الله تعالى، وأخبر به رسوله صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم والتسليم به؛
كما قال الإمام الزهري رحمه الله تعالى: من الله الرسالة وعلى الرسول البلاغ وعلينا التسليم
وكما قال الإمام سفيان بن عيينة رحمه الله تعالى: (كل ما وصف الله تعالى به نفسه في القرآن فقراءته تفسيره لا كيف، ولا مثل)
وكما قال الإمام الشافعي رحمه الله تعالى: (آمنت بالله، وبما جاء عن الله على مراد الله، وآمنت برسول الله وبما جاء عن رسول الله على مراد رسول الله)
وقال الوليد بن مسلم: سألت الأوزاعي، وسفيان بن عيينة، ومالك بن أنس عن هذه الأحاديث في الصفات والرؤية، فقالوا: (أمروها كما جاءت بلا كيف)
وقال الإمام مالك بن أنس - إمام دار الهجرة - رحمه الله: إياكم والبدع قيل: وما البدع؟ قال: أهل البدع هم الذين يتكلمون في أسماء الله وصفاته وكلامه وعلمه وقدرته، ولا يسكتون عما سكت عنه الصحابة والتابعون لهم بإحسان وسأله رجل عن قوله تعالى: الرَّحْمَنُ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ اسْتَوَى كيف استوى؟ فقال: الاستواء غير مجهول، والكيف غير معقول، والإيمان به واجب، والسؤال عنه بدعة، وما أراك إلا ضالاً، وأمر به أن يخرج من المجلس
وقال الإمام أبو حنيفة رحمه الله تعالى: لا ينبغي لأحد أن ينطق في ذات الله بشيء؛ بل يصفه بما وصف به نفسه، ولا يقول فيه برأيه شيئاً؛ تبارك الله تعالى رب العالمين ولما سئل - رحمه الله - عن صفة النزول، فقال: ينزل بلا كيف.
وقال الحافظ الإمام نعيم بن حماد الخزاعي رحمه الله: من شبه الله بخلقه فقد كفر، ومن أنكر ما وصف به نفسه فقد كفر، وليس ما وصف به نفسه ولا رسوله تشبيها
وقال بعض السلف: قدم الإسلام لا تثبت إلا على قنطرة التسليم لذا فإنه من سلك مسلك السلف في الحديث عن ذات الله تعالى وصفاته، يكون ملتزماً بمنهج القرآن في أسماء الله وصفاته سواء كان السالك في عصر السلف، أو في العصور المتأخرة وكل من خالف السلف في منهجهم؛ فلا يكون ملتزماً بمنهج القرآن، وإن كان موجوداً في عصر السلف، وبين أظهر الصحابة والتابعين
you are wahaby mujassim kafir ignorant jahil www.sunnaonline.org
bachi kamal strong language can you put that exact same ruling to these people who said Allah azawajal has a hand he sees and hears.
حَدَّثَنَا الْقَاسِمُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا هُرَيْرَةَ، يَقُولُ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِنَّ اللَّهَ يَقْبَلُ الصَّدَقَةَ وَيَأْخُذُهَا بِيَمِينِهِ فَيُرَبِّيهَا لأَحَدِكُمْ كَمَا يُرَبِّي أَحَدُكُمْ مُهْرَهُ حَتَّى إِنَّ اللُّقْمَةَ لَتَصِيرُ مِثْلَ أُحُدٍ " . وَتَصْدِيقُ ذَلِكَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ (وهُوَ الَّذِي يَقبَلُ التَّوبَةَ عَنْ عِبَادِهِ ) ويَأْخُذُ الصَّدَقَاتِ (يَمْحَقُ الله الرَّبَا ويُرْبِي الصَّدَقَاتِ)
(...) Qasim ibn Muhammad said that he heard from Abu Hurayrah (radiyallahu anh) narrated that Rasulullah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) said: Indeed Allah accepts charity, and He accepts it with His Right (Hand) to nurture it for one of you, just like one of you would nurture his foal, until the bite (of food) becomes as large as Uhud. The Book of Allah Azza wa Jalla (the Mighty and Sublime) testifies to that: "He accepts repentance from His worshipers, and accepts charity." (at-Tawbah 9/104) And: "Allah will destroy Ribaa (interest) and will give increase for charity." (al-Baqarah 2/276).”
After narrating this Hadith, Imam Tirmidhi said:
هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ.
وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنْ عَائِشَةَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَحْوُ هَذَا. وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}.
This Hadith is Hasan Sahih. It has been reported from Aishah (radiyallahu anha) from Nabi (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) similarly.
It has been stated by more than one person from the people of knowledge regarding this Hadith, and about the likes of it from the narrations concerning the Attributes, and that Rabb (Lord), Tabaraka wa Ta’ala (the Most Blessed, the Most High), Descends to the lowest heaven of this world every night. They said: Affirm the narrations concerning them; have faith in them; do not imagine them; nor ask how they are. The likes of this has been reported from Malik ibn Anas, Sufyaan ibn Uyaynah and Abdullah ibn al-Mubaarak. They said concerning these Ahadith: Leave them as they are, without asking how they are. This is the saying of the people of knowledge from Ahl’us Sunnah wa'l Jamaa'ah. As for the Jahmiyyah, then they reject these narrations and say that this is Tashbih (resemblance). However, Allah Azza wa Jall (the Most High) has mentioned in various places in His Book (His Attribute of) al-Yad (Hand); as-Sam (Hearing) and al-Basir (Seeing), but the Jahmiyyah give a Ta'wil (figurative interpretation) to these verses and explain it in a manner other than how it is explained by the people of knowledge. They say: Indeed, Allah did not create Adam (alayhi salam) with His Hand. They say: Indeed, the Hand (of Allah) actually means His Power! Ishaq ibn Ibrahim said: Tashbih (resemblance) is when someone says the Hand (of Allah) is like my hand, or His Hearing is like my hearing. So if someone says this, then this is resemblance. But if someone says what Allah says, Hand, Hearing, Seeing; and he does not ask how these (Attributes) are, nor does he say that Allah's Hearing is like my hearing, then this is not resemblance. Rather, it just like what Allah Ta’ala (the Most Blessed, the Most High), said in His Book: "There is none like Him; He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing." (ash-Shura 42/11) (Tirmidhi, Jami Sunan, #662)
@@bachikamal6626
Stupid.
Jezakumulahul kheyr MashaAllah
I get very confused sometimes because I am Athari, but I'm not Salafi...Why when most Asharis discuss the differences their is almost never a distinguishing on traditional Hanbali/Atharia and modern Salafist. Do the Ashari not believe traditionalist who follow Hanbali in Fiqh and Athari in Creed to be rightly guided? I was not taught to see the words as literal but simply confirming the words without reinterpretung them or asking how.
The salafis have hijacked the word athari.
Yes Ash’aris say traditional Atharis are rightly guided, whilst the neo-Salafis aren’t.
It’s called Tafwidh
there are countlesss hadeeth proving Allah's hands and Face, and Ibn taymiyya did not believe Allah had a hand like his creation. Rather there is no likeness in the Hands of Allah to his creation. nor his glorious face.
The key is laysa kamithlihi shay.
Alhamdulillah. What I know is that I am Asha'irah. Not a Wahhabi or Shi'i in aqeedah.
@@narasenapati3773 wat aqeedah shia follow?
Indeed
No matter how many times we say to these Sufis. They'd always blame us, the Ahlul Athar, to be Mujassimah while we are the ones who purely do radd of Mujassimah ☝️
*You are a mushriq believing Allah is a body, a murtad, and deserve the apostasy punishment in the Caliphate infront of a Qadi, unless you repent, so better keep quiet, you are a danger to this Ummah, and invoking the Fire on them with your Wahhabe kufr of the najdi mushriqeen*
Ash'ari and Maturidi is the aqeedah of the Salaf, the Sahaba. Not the flawed creed of Imam Ibn Taymiyya.
Mohiuddin23 The ashari creed came from abul hassan al ashari. Not Islam.
@Ibn Muhammad proof and who?
@@holdshiftt2run308Bukhari Muslim And All Hadith Book's are of Scholars Not of RasoolAllah ﷺ
when the Salaf believed in those verse of Quran and they did not delve in the meaning, then when Ashari and Maturidi make tawil and interpret those verses based on their own thinking. Allah sent Quran to guide mankind not to misguide them or make them anthropomorphic. What was the creed of Muslim before Ashari/Mturidi?
"in a manner that befits his Majesty" is just another form of Ta'wil.
"A hand but not like our hands" is affirming the word but not the literal meaning of the word, which is ta'wil, except a dumb ta'wil compared to the ta'wil of Asharis and Maturidis.
@TheHaroon786786
Imam Abul hasan Ashary -
born - 260/270 Hijry,
died - 324 Hijry
Imam abu monsur Maturidy -
born - disputed, 247 Hijry
died - 333 Hijry.
Imam Ashary was MUTAJILA in early life. Then changed his ideas- invented Ashary aqeeda,.Finally, before his death - Imam Ashary did tauba, repented and accepted Salafi aqeeda.
Imam Maturidy actually Ashary aqeeda with certain differences.
Were muslims ( sahaba, tabeyin, tabe-tabeyin, 4 Imams, Hadiths writers, 4 khalifas) ignorant about Aqeeda before the coming
of Imam Ashary, Imam Maturidy? ( naujubillah).
Quran 5:7( paraphrased) -
today, I ( Allah) has perfected your religion ( Islam), and has completed my favour upon you.
So, we don't need the innovation ( bidat) of explaining Allah's names attributes with Greek philosophy.
Remember -
Quran 3:7-
some ayats - mohkam(clear)
some ayats - mutasabihat(unclear),
but we must believe in all ayats without hesitation to be muslim.
Muslims before Ashary -Maturidy were all SALAFIS.
Except rare exception of Jahmia, Qaderia, murjia, mutajila, Shia, khareji etc.
Ashary -maturidy aqeeda began after 300 Hijry.
This man has lost it bro ! His aqeedah is messed up he is making tawil which is out of Tafseer and hence bidaah
I agree with your statement brother.
Jazak Allahu Khayr brother! God bless your soul and give you the highest level with the Prophet Muhammad, sallallahu alayhi wa sallam
z
That level of jannah is just for the prophets because they are much highly ranked then us
@5:08 Mufti saab mistakenly said they attribute a human like form of face and hand even after explaining a few seconds earlier that they said its not like a human form,
If its Allah's speech in the quran we can't discard it so sometimes you have to go there to try and understand.
The word face shouldn't be limited to 2 eyes, nose and a mouth e.g. we have a clock face which has 2 hands but we don't attribute a human like form to it.
Quran 42:11
That's the explanation of Allah's face, hands,eyes etc.
Affirm for Allaah what he affirmed for himself. Negate for Allaah what he negated himself. Why do asharis have to confuse everything?
u can say that to Maturidi ask well......
The point is that the Salaf(First three Generations of Companions,students,etc... after the Prophet{pbuh}) view on Philosophy or Kalam on Quran is dont try to Interpret something when u CANT give 100% Certainty?
Tabishe Arshad Even in English the word hand has 7 meanings, so which meaning are you affirming for Allah since you claim the meaning is clear just not the how.
@@linoazzurro the meaning is clear
@@falsehoodrefuted an appendage used to grab something
@@linoazzurro No we don't say appendage, we don't say limb or any other words, do you know why?
Because we don't use words that Allah hasn't used. We just affirn the texts based upon their apparent meaning.
It means something that holds.
Thats one of the meanings of Yad.
I can prove to you easily that Yad means that above from the Qur'an itself and also from the narrations of the Salaf. All of the 4 Imams affirmed it.
Tell me however what do you say that Yad is?
When I converted from christianity to islam and read about the 'hands' or 'face' of Allah I just continued reading knowing that the meaning could not be taken literal.
Years later I found out the diffirent theologies and realized that the Salafi/Athari theology comes closest to the antropomorphicism in Christianity.
OK then, do you take Allah( swbt) powers, knowledge,earing,seeing living literally....
@@Spark12429 the earth is described as "she" in the Quran, is this literal as well?
Allah exists. U exist. Allah hears. U hear. What's the issue with Allah having a hand or face. Ofc it's not like ours
Ma shaa Alloh ❤
Until one become stupid - blind - deaf and dumb - not given a life and then given a second of life and then tries to express Allah, he will fail to describe Him. At least he tried but failed. Just don't share your opinion with others. Why? Because the opinion came from of person of a stupid, blind, deaf, dumb that requires one second of life to live. Even if you get the answer, stop telling how God looks like.😊Laisa ka mithli hi - probably means nothing is like him and you saw him devoid of example😂.
For those misunderstanding below, the Mufti in the video is talking about the history of the arguments that developed in the scholars of the past. He is also clarrifying the difference between the saudi salafis and the actual historical first 3 generations of Muslims.
Possibly, saudi salafis have changed their views today but Mufti is describing the early saudi salafi views.
It is He who has sent down to you, [O Muḥammad], the Book; in it are verses [that are] precise - they are the foundation of the Book - and others unspecific.1 As for those in whose hearts is deviation [from truth], they will follow that of it which is unspecific, seeking discord and seeking an interpretation [suitable to them]. And no one knows its [true] interpretation except Allāh. But those firm in knowledge say, "We believe in it. All [of it] is from our Lord." And no one will be reminded except those of understanding. 3:7
once again, the hypocracy of the hashawiya abounds. its ok to slander any of the a'immah they wish, but say uff against ibn taymiya, albani, or bin baz and they breathe fire from their snouts. TYPICAL
Do you even know all the ridiculous and hypocritical stuff bin baz spoke?
yes, this is the proper aqeedah, not Ashari or maturidi
thats the aqidah of the ahlulsunnah al asha'irah
great explaination shaikh....jazakallah khair..!
2:48 This is literally what modern day Salafis do.
Yes u right...follow majority ashari maturidi...salafi are confusing muslims...
@infinitedimension1 because that is the true 'aqeedah of the Salaf, that Allaah has a face, hand, feet, fingers, that Allaah runs, laughs, smiles etc.
but remember "laysa kamithlihee shay"
but if you cant do that then apply a figurative interpretation that Imam Ashari R.A provided e.g. Yad (hand) has 25 different meaning as oppossed to a literal hand itself e.g. power, domain, control.
I hoped that helped brother-Salaam
The safest point is to believe that we leave it to Allah. Only Allah knows about his attributes well. Human mind can't capture these. We only just listen & believe.
@@mahossain9260 yup or otherwise we will go into confusion
Allah said He has a Hand, He has a face. Then we affirmed it as He said without asking 'HOW' without misinterpreting it to other meanings, without likening His attributes to His Creatures. This is the way of the Salaf. Other than that is going astray!
Did interpretations of the word 'Yad' as power, domain, etc came from any of the Sahābah? NO
Then we don't follow your Imām Ash'arī
Again taweel. If there's no clear apparent meaning in Quran and sunnah and the scholars of salaf why people wanted to dig it.
Is he Abdurrahman mangeera?
dora emon yes
Shaykh ul Islam Taqiudeen ibn Taymiyya the great sword against all innovators, Mushriks ,Munafiqs etc.
He destroyed ilm kalaam which these guys love .
Lol...He declared the shia as kafir, which would make him a kafir on the day of judgement.
@@blackflag6976 that's حكم عام and not حكم خاص? How can someone claim to be muslim when they don't believe in any sahaba, ratherthey curse the sahaba and umm Al momineen,
@@Asad-gv9in Belief in the sahaba is not one of the 6 articles of faith. It makes them a faasiq but not disbelievers.
Btw most shias dont curse the sahaba. Khamenei specifically published a fatwa prohibiting it
@@blackflag6976 cursing sahaba is not what made them kuffar (حكم عام) , grave worshipping, asking Ali and Hussain etc. Also, really appreciate the civil conversation we are having, alot of people start mocking each other, punching etc.
00:55 "He has a form like a human form," Said no scholar ever in history
ua-cam.com/video/0gBSsOVwrCI/v-deo.html
@@awehornet In this video Maulana Uthman (Deobandi) agrees with shaykh Al-Albani (Salafi), saying that Allah does not have human attributes.
MashaALLAH... Brothers ALL Sifat of ALLAH in the Qur-an are TRUE, we must believe it but REFRAIN from liking it to anything.ALLAH IS LAYSA KA MITHLI SAYYE'...
excellent speech..
the video from 2010. Now 2021 ..this salafi grow bigger
They at the top position in government and islamic institution
follow the aqeedah of the Salaf, Sahaba
@@abubeast8816 why do u keep disputing wen haqq is clear...would u say that majority of ummah is wrong and have deviated?this goes against the prophecy and promised of Allah and his messanger saw...
Sad to see my Brothers/Countries of Islam having this conflict among each other.
The Safest way “will” be the ٱلْمَهْدِيّ way.
Even moulana gangohi admits Allah's sifat.
masha Allah sheikhanaa may Allah protect you
very true akhi, regardless, may Allah guide them, they are lost in regards to this aspect of the deen, which is most important, CREED, AQEEDAH, this religion is perfected for them,
Mashallah. Thank you for this clear elucidation of these issues.
Has anyone seen Allaah, Himself (ذاته او نفسه)? Can we describe how Allaah looks like? Obviously the answer will be 'NO'. so are His attributes (صفات), actions (أفعال) and whatever He said about Himself. Allaah knows Himself better than us.
Some of his attributes are manifested in the creation like wen u look at how Allah shaped different fruits ,trees animals etc ...Allah is the shaper of beauty
There is NOTHING LIKE UNTO HIM
End of subject
Exactly 👍
May Allah guide you
I really find it to hard to believe that taking the names and attributes of Allah for their apparent meaning is a cause of deviation. Rather the opposite is true, i.e. making taweel or tafweed is a cause of deviation.
Sheikh Assim Al Hakeem says Ashari and Maturidi aqeedah is problematic because it's based on "conviction" . I did not agree with him. I have stopped listening to him. But still i don't understand what he meant
it has no basis from sunnah, learn deeply about it and you wll find that it developed with the help of ilm ul kalam (greek philosophy)
Just come out and say that I’m ashari in aqeedah
or maturidi
so the Khalaf have better understanding then the Salaf? eh?
lentilsouper lol these sufis
you are wahaby mujassim kafir ignorant jahil www.sunnaonline.org
bachi kamal lol takfiri sufis
@@bachikamal6626
Stupid
Ashari and maturidi were from salaf
3:55 that's what imam malik said when a man asked him about استوى, and that the aqeedah of ahlus sunnah
Please ask the sheikh about this fatwa. Is it authentic ?
al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya:
“It is okay for a man to see from his mother, mature daughter, sister and all other Mahram women such as grandmothers, grandchildren, paternal and maternal aunts, at their: hair, chest, locks, breasts, forearms (shoulders) and shins. It is not permissible to look at their back, stomach and the area between the navel and (including the) knees.”(Al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya, 5/328)
Can anyone tell me where i can find the whole lecture?
Brother where is this complete bayan. Can u pls help...
asharis believe la ilaha ila Allah Muhammad rasul Allah. is that false?
May Allah guide you.
He is a liar, in minute 1:08, he did not read the full ayah and did not mention the continuation:
لبسكَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ ۖ *(وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِير)ُ*
"He is the All Hearing and All Seeing"
So, while Allah is the *"All Hearing and All Seeing"* Allah Almighty's "Hearing and Seeing" is not and can never be the same as human's hearing and seeing, for human's attribute is limited, while Allah's attributes is boundless and unlimited.
To accuse one of anthromorphism like the speaker did is only reflective of his igorance of the deen.
The companions, the tabien, the tabi' tabien, the Four Great Imams; Abu Haneefah, Malik, Ashafie and the last of them, Imam Ahmad (d.260hijrah), never did takwil of the sifats (attributes), *but took them literally from the quran and the authenticated hadiths*, thus the quetion of anthromorphism did not arise from among them. The accusation of anthromorphism was first introduced into islam by the Jahmites (Jahm ibn Safwan) , Muktazilah and became widespread during the Neo Ashaaris era in the 7th century of the Hijrah calendar.
The early Ahlussunnah scholars, as early as the second century (hijrah) used to refute these new philosophical approach towards "takwil" of the Attributes (Sifat) saying, "If anyone who accused those whose belief in Allah include Allah's Attributes as mentioned in the Quran and the authenticated Sunnah, *know that the one who accused is a Jahmite, for only one who had first imagined the Attributes (Allah's a.z) to be similar to his ownself, thinking that these attributes are similar to his, thus he has committed anthromorphism (likening Allah to his creations), thence requiring him to reject the attributes.
In other words, Only *a Muattilah (those who reject Allah's attributes)* would accuse the Ahlussunnah (Those who accepted Allah's Attributes without takwil) of Anthromorphism, i.e. One first had to imagine that Allah's hand is like his hand, so that is why he had to reject (or make takwil) of the Attributes.
wallahu a'lam.
Anyway stick with ashari and maturidi the majority
so will the believers not see Allah in Jannah, with all due respect, the Ashari and Maturidi, are clearly misguided in these aspects. return to the Sunnah
We dont go into detail ...wen the time comes we will know
in heaven and be among the believers when Allah S.W.T passes judgement.
0:53
Atharis like Hanbali never believe in "Mujasima" Anthropology.
Here Sheikh it seems you should clarity, who are the Mujasima. For surely Atharis are not.
Atharis does know "Laysa ka misliHi shai"
"They say BilLa KayFiyah"
MAY GOD BLESS US............ AMEEN
You're CREATING a creature. Not us. 🤧🥀
So Allah has a hand but we don't know what it means because "nothing is like unto Him"?
Is this correct?
Dont give it a literal meaning...just read it and say only Allah knows wat he meant by that...and remeber there is nothing like unto him...nothing ressemble Allah...He(royalty) is unique
no accept what that verse say but dont apply a literal meaning to it e.g. hand- in other words read it and accept it but dont go beyond that e.g.God has a hand (a thumb, four fingers and a palm by definition)-because it contradicts the very verse your trying to follow 'theirs NOTHING like him' (nothing our minds can imagine) and we would be 'creating similitudes for Allah' 16:74 (comparing Allah to his creation)- by saying he has a HAND which by definition is '4 fingers a palm and fingers'.
What the brother is saying don’t talk about it, I don’t know why people have an issue with this
Musa Alaihissalaam clearly believed you could see Allah literally. Was he a kafir?
Mashallah . This brother has described it very well. 🌹🌹❤️🌹
I wonder, does Allaah introduce himself to us with words that we don't understand or with words that can take one to KUFR if they are understood as they appear. Why did Allaah want to confuse us.
Does the Sun rise and set?
Yes
According to how we see it
@@falsamehabsame3268 It actually doesnt in LITERAL sense the earth is in orbit around the Sun and the Moon. Although we use the words rise and set for our understanding. It's a metaphoric, so when Allah swt uses those words to describe himself it's so he can speak to us so we can understand the Ayah. Allah swt doesnt need you to be literal of it and give him forms and shapes.
Hope thos helps
Mashaa ALLAH. ALLAH Knows best
You follow your Aql(intelligence) before Naql(revealed text) that's why Jahmiyyah & Ashaa'irah & all those misguided misguided they fall into this trap, because they were influenced by the Greek philosophies . You think your something, you are a critical thinker by placing your Aql over what Allah revealed? Huh
You are the mushahbihaat you are imagining anthropomorphic qualities to Him when we just affirm what He affirmed of His attributes in Quran. We don't describe it 'How' yes Allah has a face but we don't try imagine it as resembling any of His Creatures. He is most perfect.
Also He has other attributes He didn't mentioned in the Qur'an. As for other attributes didn't mentioned in Quran we never negate that we just stop it there & affirm what He affirmed in the book.
It’s not necessary for schoolers to entertain those fitna, because it won’t stop. You can’t prove beliefs with theology, at extreme they will go ask prove who created Allah. And you will stop proving answers like he is uncreated. So it’s the first principal of being Muslim to have faith in Allah and leave unanswered questions to him. No one is forcing anyone to believe Islam and everyone is welcome to leave.
So my final point is don’t innovate like Maturidi did.
Doesn’t work and it failes at some point
For they took ahlus sunaah wal jamaah then salaafi movement. They going to still ash ashari
@odkrivamoResnico
Walaykum salaam,
the dvd can be purchased from amsons website or assuffa website.
Today's Ash'aris are Jahmiyyah
How?
@kausartrouser sheikh asrar rasheed and sheikh yaseen have debated damisqiya check it out on you tube.
sheikh Asrar is Indian hanafi Berelvi.
What debate?
Before 300 Hijry, no Ashary- Maturidy aqeeda.
So, were Sahabas, Tabeyin, Tabe-tabeyin, 4 khalifas, 4 Imams ignorant about Aqeeda ( naujubillah)?
What debate?
Ashary- Maturidy Aqeeda is an innovation ( BIDATI) Aqeeda.
We, Salafs don't need debate with Bidati people.
maashaAllah
Jazakellahu khayr for explanation...
Yeah well he lied, he said that we give Allah "a body" or "human" form thats not whatvwe say we merely affirm what Allah said about himself Allah has a face, Allah has two eyes, Allah has 2 right hands Allah has a shin, but we also affirm there is nothing like unto him and you cannot even imagine Allah. A simple example is this, a chair has legs and hands, but does the chair resemble human legs? Or animal legs, no
😂 you just contradicted yourself, Mujassimah. 🤦🏽♂️
ahl sunna wal jamaa =ashaari maturidi = deobandi+ berlewi + iknwan moslimun( in arabic world ) +sufi + scientific mujtahid
Who are ikwan muslimun?i know that barelvi and deobandi are sunni ...and they dont reject sulook /tassawuf either...but salafi reject tareeqa
Maliki, sharing, hanbali
Very good
Lol
Fear Allaah
Innovation is Innovation full stop!
Wahhabism is full of innovation.
@@blackflag6976 stop using wahabi slur to justify the innovations that can't be proved from Quran/sunnah/ij
mah of Sahaba
@@sohailhashmi4455 Wahhabi means follower of Abdul wahhab najdi, the takfiri extremist.
Asharis and Maturidis follow the text. They are upon sunnah, though they may not be a 100% spot on.
@@blackflag6976 u are delusional. First of all no one calls themselves wahabi, and ashari and maturidi dont follow text, you dont even know what you talk??? You do taweel which means explaining texts through philisophy. Atharis follow text as it is.
@@aaquib2010 No one calls themselves Rafidhi or Khawarij either. The same goes for wahhabis. They are what they are.
And to be more specific, its the madkhalis who are the most sectarian, intolerant group within the wahhabis.
Ofcourse Asharis and Maturidis follow the text, they just dont take all of it literally. Whats wrong with explaining it using philosophy? Its just logic.
This guys aqeeedah is screwed! May Allah save the innocent who study under him ! Allah said His wajj so it’s wajj it’s his face that’s it ! We dnt need this guy to give it a meaning ! So scary to listen to such
Wahabis hate this
Scholars in saudi arabia, brother these wahabi government paid scholars are deviant, true scholars of ahlus sunnah are there in makkah and madinah .. Habib al jifri, abdullah bin bayyah,son of muhammad bin alawi al maliki etc etc
These are just few ...there are many many
He doesn't even know anything about the aqida of ahla suna wal Jamma. If Allah said has hands, you should accept it but don't say what kind. Because No ones looks like him ( laysa kamisluhu shaya)
kuluku100 I agree with you Owen Wilson. If Allah said it and we cant grasp it, we leave it to Allah. But these sufis say that we claim Allah has human hands. Allah had has Allah's hands.
kuluku100 Do you know how stupid you sound. Allah has appendages? Does He have wrists not like our wrists as well? I used to be a wahabi so I know how ridiculous is this anthropomorphist's views.
This is kind of silly. Hand, face, throne, etc., are all analogies. They were expressed in poetic terms precisely so that we as human beings could understand their meaning. The Qur'an 3:3 clearly says metaphors are used in the revelation. So what's the problem? Just look at how throne was used in the Psalms or other scriptures. Throne was a metaphor for power and ultimate authority. It's 2018, much has been discovered in science. There's no throne or chair floating around in the sky.
حَدَّثَنَا الْقَاسِمُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ، قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا هُرَيْرَةَ، يَقُولُ قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم " إِنَّ اللَّهَ يَقْبَلُ الصَّدَقَةَ وَيَأْخُذُهَا بِيَمِينِهِ فَيُرَبِّيهَا لأَحَدِكُمْ كَمَا يُرَبِّي أَحَدُكُمْ مُهْرَهُ حَتَّى إِنَّ اللُّقْمَةَ لَتَصِيرُ مِثْلَ أُحُدٍ " . وَتَصْدِيقُ ذَلِكَ فِي كِتَابِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ (وهُوَ الَّذِي يَقبَلُ التَّوبَةَ عَنْ عِبَادِهِ ) ويَأْخُذُ الصَّدَقَاتِ (يَمْحَقُ الله الرَّبَا ويُرْبِي الصَّدَقَاتِ)
(...) Qasim ibn Muhammad said that he heard from Abu Hurayrah (radiyallahu anh) narrated that Rasulullah (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) said: Indeed Allah accepts charity, and He accepts it with His Right (Hand) to nurture it for one of you, just like one of you would nurture his foal, until the bite (of food) becomes as large as Uhud. The Book of Allah Azza wa Jalla (the Mighty and Sublime) testifies to that: "He accepts repentance from His worshipers, and accepts charity." (at-Tawbah 9/104) And: "Allah will destroy Ribaa (interest) and will give increase for charity." (al-Baqarah 2/276).”
After narrating this Hadith, Imam Tirmidhi said:
هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ.
وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنْ عَائِشَةَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَحْوُ هَذَا. وَقَدْ قَالَ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ وَمَا يُشْبِهُ هَذَا مِنَ الرِّوَايَاتِ مِنَ الصِّفَاتِ وَنُزُولِ الرَّبِّ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى كُلَّ لَيْلَةٍ إِلَى السَّمَاءِ الدُّنْيَا قَالُوا قَدْ تَثْبُتُ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِي هَذَا وَيُؤْمَنُ بِهَا وَلاَ يُتَوَهَّمُ وَلاَ يُقَالُ كَيْفَ هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ مَالِكٍ وَسُفْيَانَ بْنِ عُيَيْنَةَ وَعَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ أَنَّهُمْ قَالُوا فِي هَذِهِ الأَحَادِيثِ أَمِرُّوهَا بِلاَ كَيْفٍ. وَهَكَذَا قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَهْلِ السُّنَّةِ وَالْجَمَاعَةِ. وَأَمَّا الْجَهْمِيَّةُ فَأَنْكَرَتْ هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتِ وَقَالُوا هَذَا تَشْبِيهٌ. وَقَدْ ذَكَرَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ فِي غَيْرِ مَوْضِعٍ مِنْ كِتَابِهِ الْيَدَ وَالسَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ فَتَأَوَّلَتِ الْجَهْمِيَّةُ هَذِهِ الآيَاتِ فَفَسَّرُوهَا عَلَى غَيْرِ مَا فَسَّرَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ وَقَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ لَمْ يَخْلُقْ آدَمَ بِيَدِهِ. وَقَالُوا إِنَّ مَعْنَى الْيَدِ هَاهُنَا الْقُوَّةُ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ إِنَّمَا يَكُونُ التَّشْبِيهُ إِذَا قَالَ يَدٌ كَيَدٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ يَدٍ أَوْ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ. فَإِذَا قَالَ سَمْعٌ كَسَمْعٍ أَوْ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ فَهَذَا التَّشْبِيهُ وَأَمَّا إِذَا قَالَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى يَدٌ وَسَمْعٌ وَبَصَرٌ وَلاَ يَقُولُ كَيْفَ وَلاَ يَقُولُ مِثْلُ سَمْعٍ وَلاَ كَسَمْعٍ فَهَذَا لاَ يَكُونُ تَشْبِيهًا وَهُوَ كَمَا قَالَ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى فِي كِتَابِهِ: {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ}.
This Hadith is Hasan Sahih. It has been reported from Aishah (radiyallahu anha) from Nabi (sallallaahu alayhi wa sallam) similarly.
It has been stated by more than one person from the people of knowledge regarding this Hadith, and about the likes of it from the narrations concerning the Attributes, and that Rabb (Lord), Tabaraka wa Ta’ala (the Most Blessed, the Most High), Descends to the lowest heaven of this world every night. They said: Affirm the narrations concerning them; have faith in them; do not imagine them; nor ask how they are. The likes of this has been reported from Malik ibn Anas, Sufyaan ibn Uyaynah and Abdullah ibn al-Mubaarak. They said concerning these Ahadith: Leave them as they are, without asking how they are. This is the saying of the people of knowledge from Ahl’us Sunnah wa'l Jamaa'ah. As for the Jahmiyyah, then they reject these narrations and say that this is Tashbih (resemblance). However, Allah Azza wa Jall (the Most High) has mentioned in various places in His Book (His Attribute of) al-Yad (Hand); as-Sam (Hearing) and al-Basir (Seeing), but the Jahmiyyah give a Ta'wil (figurative interpretation) to these verses and explain it in a manner other than how it is explained by the people of knowledge. They say: Indeed, Allah did not create Adam (alayhi salam) with His Hand. They say: Indeed, the Hand (of Allah) actually means His Power! Ishaq ibn Ibrahim said: Tashbih (resemblance) is when someone says the Hand (of Allah) is like my hand, or His Hearing is like my hearing. So if someone says this, then this is resemblance. But if someone says what Allah says, Hand, Hearing, Seeing; and he does not ask how these (Attributes) are, nor does he say that Allah's Hearing is like my hearing, then this is not resemblance. Rather, it just like what Allah Ta’ala (the Most Blessed, the Most High), said in His Book: "There is none like Him; He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing." (ash-Shura 42/11) (Tirmidhi, Jami Sunan, #662)
kuluku100 you can disagree but whether you like it or not he his more qualified then you
Stop worshipping ibntaymih
He contributed a lot and respect him but dont follow him in aqeedah
This guy has a very superficial view of the history and development of groups in thier Aqeedah. So far I have watched a few videos and he seems very much afraid of the Salafi's. Comes across very clear now.
Yeah!
And you know it all..
He is graduated from deobandi uloom who are maturidi and sufi
Maturidi & Ashaira are deviant, no doubt about that.
They are out of the fold of Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jammah.
They reject Quranic verses.
Why don't you get contentment on the word of Imam Malik.
May Allah-swt guide you.
How about wahabi asholes?
Nope even the conqueror of Constantinople and his army were ashari hanafi and sufi and was praised by the holy prophet saw...if u say majority muslims are misguided then u are going against rasulAllah prophecies and devine promise that majority will not go astray...modern salafi are not sunni ...where was your group before 200 year ago?nowhere everyone were ashari and maturidi for thousand of years ...u people definitely goes against the majority...plus even ahlul bayt are maturidi and ashari ...like sheickh mohammad al yaqubi ect he is 34 descendant of hazrat imam hassan ra...
Lol so u just said the majority of the ummah in history was out of the fold of sunni
Yourself are ashari
Na'am ya ahkee, have some adab though, and these matters don't interpret, just say i believe. Qalas.
The Maturidi and Ashari use of logic paved the way for innovative ideologies such as justifying grave worshipping, celebrating birthdays of the prophet. They have pushed the envelope of reason and logic so far that they've fallen off the cliff.
U made Allah into a form/idol
False. Grave worshipping is done even by shias who arent even from ashari/maturidi aqeedah.
Celebrating birthdays is an issue of dispute. Many asharis dont do it either.
@@simplykudos5249 ne we didn't. We affirm what Allah and his prophet affirmed without any تكييف وتعطيل ونحوه. If you want to know the salafi position regarding asma wa siffat, the read the aqwal of imam malik
@@blackflag6976 that's what!!! The idea of grave worshipping was taken from the mushrikoon by the Shia, which eventually was taken by the asharis. Anyways these topics are very vast, and the comments don't do justice to it. Bottom line is that grave worshipping and milad are innovation which the sahaba s never did!
@@Asad-gv9in Grave worshipping is haraam and not a part of the Ashari creed, and it's prohibited in the hadith.
Milaad is also not a part of the Ashari creed. However we can't say if it is haraam or not as there is no mention whether it's allowed or prohibited.
These are complete lies.
Masya Allah ....
subhanallah so many flaws in this speech. for starters the people on the correct aqeedah only say take the OBVIOUS interpretation of the verses (which is how Allah describes himself). if Allah says he has hands then who are we to say 'no don't you dare interpret that'.. why are you Sufis complicating things?? you're making this religion hard on you.
BTW I respect this shaykh the same way he 'respects' shaykul Islam ibn taymiyyah. I take what is beneficial from him and does not corrode my aqeedah such as his adab as suhbah videos
@@bachikamal6626
Stupid.
I will just stick to majority ...
In fact its salafi who is complicating thing
والله لا يعرف عقيدة السلف
تقصد من بالسلف؟ والله انت من تعرف من هم السلف!!!
I feel the br,but he still dry the SUFIS know best!
He is a sufi sunni
@@tazboy1934 Sufi is one who does grave worship. He isnt one.
He is a sufi..plus no sufi does grave worship@@blackflag6976
U blind...
This guy is redundant
For somebody to say Shaykhul Islam Taqi ud deen Ibn taymiyyah's is debatedable shows that this individual does not have the correct Aqeedah. SubhanALLAAH. Nobody in his time said he had the worng aqeedah or his aqeedah was debatable except the deviants of his time. We ask ALLAAH to guide this man and his false speech.
Cowardice from this imam. You follow the aqeedah of Plato and Aristotle
May Allah guide this misguided brother as he is very far astray. He is acting like an ignorant fool
Hamed Kakar And you are a genius. You claim Allah has fingers but not like our fingers.
So u know better than a qualified scholar?
Why don’t you go to Makkah the foundation of Islam and learn your Aqeeda from them like of that of the salaf not maturidi you are a pure deobandi stop acting like you know more than scholars in Makkah
It’s amazing how quickly you guys turn in to muftis and yet can’t practice simple Hadiths from bukhari in your life’s.
Islam is not about turban and rejecting clear Hadiths from bukhari and Muslim.
And stop projecting your ill Aqeeda on the book of Allah
Allah the all wise knows what he is talking about if he said hand that what he meant if someone with ill heart wants to compare it human hands then he hasn’t understood the Quran or Allah.
You have to understand the circumstance and logic behind the matu. and ashar. school:
In the time of the selef, they didnt interpret ayets, which described allah, because at this time nobody misunderstood those. The same reason why there were no mezheb, cause everything was clear without different oppinions. Yet it was clear, those ayets had a meaning in different ways (muteshabehat) but they just didnt touch it. After prophet died, slowly different opinions appeared, just like lieteral understanding of allah-describing ayets. So mezhebs evolved, who tried to explain what the prophet meant with the ayets and hadith. Nobody invented anything, they all had the logic 'in my research, i came to the conclusion that the prophet meant this and this with this ayet'.
We cant compare ourselves to the selef, especialy to the sahabe, cause they didnt need big explanations cause they were there, when the prophet was alive. So you cant aply the logic 'i believe just like the sahabe' because you dont have the same undivided opinion source (the prophet himself). So its just normal that we are depending on those explanations of imam azam or imam maturidi. So its the logic 'They explain the kuran and sunnah for us'
This mufti must know that even in fiqh he made weird statements. He incorporated fiqh into Aqeedah matters which led to Takfeer. Thus such understandings by ibn Taymiyyah cause chaos in the Muslim nation. He is the father of terrorism in this ummah which is destructive. Yes, he was a scholar who became extremely philosophical and thus deviated.