The Fifth Madhhab | Mufti Abdur-Rahman ibn Yusuf
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 тра 2015
- Title: The Fifth Madhhab
Description: Mufti Abdur-Rahman ibn Yusuf discusses the propaganda of this age of abandoning the four schools of thought and opting for a modern methodology of following the Qur'an and sunnah directly. He explains how the pseudo-salafi movement is in reality a reattempt at devising a new school of thought which though may seem appealing in theory, lacks any validity in practicality, especially when put into contrast with the unanimous validity of the existing four schools. A thorough discussion, broken down into a very easily understandable explanation on how fallacious the re-inventing of the wheel in Islamic scholarship is, enumerating just how nobody truly goes back to the Qur'an and sunnah as ultimate sources but rather creating a "fifth madhab" which has no real basis; especially as it contradicts the very principles that it is based upon. A must watch for any Muslim who is sincere about finding the truth in these testing times.
You can also like us on facebook: / zamzamacademy
or Follow us on twitter: / zamzamacademy
Our UA-cam channel is: / zamzamacademy
For publications: www.whitethreadpress.com
Thank you, Mufti Abdul-Rahman. You have clarified this issue between following a madhab or not for me. This is the best explanation I’ve heard on this topic in 20 years. May Allah swt. bless you and give you great reward fiddunya wal akhirah.
I'm glad there are still open minded people left on earth
ua-cam.com/video/SBlYYQb8bcc/v-deo.html
MaashaaAllah Sheikh explained the topic in detail and in a very eloquent way. The best one I have seen on this subject. It was really beneficial alhamdulillah.
May Allah preserve him ameen
Just finished watching this, amazing video MashaAllah. Everything broken down and explained for all to understand easily. May Allah swt bless and preserve Mufti Abdur Rahman and the ZamZamAcademy team. Ameen
Salamun Alaykum. Have you been in front of my eyes and within my reach, I would have missed your forehead say 10 times. Subhan Allah. Allah has blessed you with enormous amount of knowledge with a lot of understanding and command in expressing it. No doubt it increased me in eemaan, Bihamdillah.
The new generation trying to follow deen while devising a madhab well beyond fifth one .....
Barak Allah u feekum.
Masha' Allah, well articulated. Just something we expect from Sheikh Abdur Rahman. As an addition to the last point about Ibn Taymiya r.a issue of "Allah, Allah" not being a Dhikr; it must be pointed out that Sahih Muslim in fact mentions a hadeeth which in its apparent wordings categorically begs the dhikr of Allah Allah.
صحيح مسلم (1/ 131)
عن أنس، أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم قال: " لا تقوم الساعة حتى لا يقال في الأرض: الله، الله "
On authority of Anas it is related that Rasulullah salallahu alayhi wasallam said, "The final hour shall not come to pass until there is no-one one earth saying Allah, Allah"
Excellent points - every great scholar of Islam followed a madhab.
Sahih hadith in imam Abu Hanifahs generation became weak by Bukharis time.
ua-cam.com/video/SBlYYQb8bcc/v-deo.html
Yaa sahih bukhari is overhyped
@@mohammedumarfarhan9900 - Sahih Bukhari is unique amongst Hadith books because it's chains of reporters /isnads are trustworthy ppl. But that doesn't mean that it is free from mistakes or errors.
@@mikhan5191 that's what I mean to say but anyhow bukhari was born after 300 yrs after the prophet ﷺ had passed away. So I got my own reservations approaching to those hadees 🙂
@@mohammedumarfarhan9900 - actually imam bukhari was born about 190 AH which is about 80 years after the last Companion died.
Besides, we have hadith books written down while many thousands of Companions were still alive and these contain mostly the same ahadith as Sahih Bukhari.
Alhamdulillah .... Love the way you talk and all of your lectures, Mufti Saab..... Allah SWT gives you hayat-e-tayyaba .....Ameen
Very good video mashallah, calm, with excellent mannerism, mashallah and knowledge nice and clear! Mashallah Alhamdulillah Mufti keep the videos coming!! Allah bless u good in both worlds Ameen. This is how an Alim!! Should be!! The topic is well presented 'The Fifth Madhab'
And with a pleasant character that make u smile and easily absorbed rather than a rigid character
Mufti saheb is a real gem.
Subghanallah we are learning something so different to other alims refuting each other may ALLAH bless you
Salamalikom wrAllah,
I hope you are doing well. Thank you for your lessons. I would like to ask you something.
How about to pray behind someone who made Mas'h on his normal socks?
Thoroughly enjoyed your discussion.. I’ve always wanted to know more about the four school of thoughts..
lol
@@FahimHameed Whats so funny?
Masah Allah.......mufti sahab aap ko nai pata k aap ne kitna bada kaam kiya h is lecture k through because a big fitna is growing in indo pak subcontinent.He always use sahih bukhari,he sound right but his akhlaq and delivery is worst than kafir and i was in dilemma that what to do.Your lecture clear my sight and now my heart is at ease.Jazak allah once again 😊😊
may allaj guide the salafis, tgey just like causing fitna
May Allah guide shirki Sufi spinners
@@hmmm3210 ameen
@@hmmm3210 lol how you dare to accuse people like that. How aren't you afraid that Allah let's that fall on you?? Brainless.
@@amersekic8535 I know they're so jahil
ua-cam.com/video/SBlYYQb8bcc/v-deo.html
MashaALLAH what a amazing explanation and may ALLAH guide him on right path
MINORITY vs MAJORITY.
Imaam Ibn al-Qayyim said in I’laam al-Muwaqqi’een (5/389): “All of the people were in contradiction (to the Truth) in the time of Ahmad ibn Hanbal,(D855 CE) except for a small group. They were the Jamaa’ah themselves (of that time). The judges, the muftees, and the Caliph of that time and his followers were all in opposition (to the Truth). It was Imaam Ahmad by himself who was the Jamaa’ah!”
sanaulla sharief - in this 1 subject matter, imam Ahmed was the most outspoken but there were many others who believed like him but remained quiet to avoid troubles.
The prophet salallahuAlayhiWasallam told us to stick to the jamaah of the great majority.
@@mikhan5191
اللہ تعالیٰ کا نامزد امام (Designated Imam)
امام ابن کثیرؒ اس آیت کے تحت لکھتے ہیں :
’’قیامت کے دن ہم ہر شخص کو اس کے امام کے ساتھ بلائیں گے‘‘۔ (بنی اسرائیل)
فرماتے ہیں : ’’یعنی یہ آیت کریمہ اہل حدیث کے لئے شرف کی بات ہے ‘‘۔ اہل حدیث کے لئے شرف اس لئے ہے کہ کیونکہ ان کے امام محمد رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ہیں باقی ہر جماعت و فرقے نے کسی شخصیت کو مقرر کرلیا اور اسے اپنا امام و لیڈر مان لیا اس کی ہر بات کو مانتے ہیں، ہر عمل کو قبول کرتے ہیں، اس کا معنی یہ ہے کہ یہ لوگ اس لیڈر کے ساتھ فرقہ بن گئے۔ اصل جماعت کیا ہے؟ اصل جماعت وہی ہے جسے قرآن نے ذکر کیا ہے :
’’اور جو مہاجرین و انصار سابق اور مقدم ہیں اور جتنے لوگ اخلاص کے ساتھ ان کے پیرو ہیں اللہ ان سب سے راضی ہوا اور وہ سب اسی سے راضی ہوئے‘‘۔ (التوبۃ: ۱۰۰)
سابقین الاولین خالص اللہ کے پیغمبر کے پیروکار تھے اور یہی راہ مستقیم ہے جس پر ابوبکر، عمر، عثمان، علی، ابو عبیدہ بن جراح، ابو طلحہ، عبدالرحمن بن عوف اور سعید بن زید رضی اللہ عنہم چلتے رہے۔ اللہ ان سے راضی ہے، اب جو ان کی راہ پر چلے گا یعنی پیغمبر علیہ السلام کی پیروی کرے گا تو اللہ ان سے بھی راضی ہوگا ان سب کے لئے جنت کی عظیم کامیابی ہے۔ رسول اللہ ؐ کے دور میں آپ ؐ کے علاوہ کوئی قائد نہ تھا، قرآن و حدیث کے علاوہ کوئی کتاب نہ تھی۔
Yes, but what the mufti said about some of imam ahmad followers becoming a bit excessive in those aqeedah issues is true... Particularly the misunderstandings of his sayings... That led to even imam bukhari being ostracised towards the end.
There was also a great bias against hanafis because they were the judges in that time. Mutazili hanafis.
Lots of time the later scholars were very biased against other schools, like juwayni harshly criticising hanafis, ibn hajr and badr ud deen had a rivalry, imam bukharee opinion on hanafi school.
It was ibn taymiyyah in his time that took away that bias and swept some of those differences aside and united the people. He held good opinions of the true sufis and lifted any thoughts 9f blame on the imams. It's not a surprise that a hanafi of around that time did one of the best explanations of aqeedah tahwiya and in some places it's lifted word for word from ibn taymiyyah writings. Also his students were from shafiees like dhahabi and ibn kathir.
Some malikees criticised ibn taymiyyah due to him criticising a particular maliki sufi tariqa. But generally speaking ibn taymiyyah reconciled people and tried to hold good opinions.
An incident happened where Al mizzi the great hadith scholar was locked up in prison due to reading a book on aqidah and ibn kathir his son in law went with ibn taymiyyah to help release him. They were both shafiees in fiqh but clearly agreed with ibn taymiyyah and hanbalees in aqeedah
@@Adrian-yf1zg history is like a movie full of drama ...
*40:00* On Da'if/Weak Hadīths.
Everyone should listen to this, Subhanallah.
This changes the game for everything
Ma Shaa Allah... Tabarakallah... great explanation ....
Very informative talk by mufti saab, hit the nail on the head when he said they want people to follow sheikh bin baaz, sheikh uthaymeen etc, may Allah swt guide us on the straight path ameen
What's wrong with Sheikh Bin Baaz
@@abusasha478 they are salafi and are ghair muqallid which is dangerous...sheickh hamza yusuf also talk about wat this sheickh talk
@@tazboy1934 Sheikh Hamza Yusuf is not Salafi if anyone thought that
Best video about this topics I have ever seen.
Masha allah, great lecture
Your just wonderful teacher. Jzk sheik.
Best one, I watched on this topic.
i have one question :i heard many time one know schoolar follow a mezhab and its aqida sufiya or other therefore what is the difference
34:40 was what i thought for so long and he put it into words for me :)
14:00 "because of my #ignorance, I'm burning inside." SubhanAllah!
MashaAllah, very good presentation indeed.
Terrific video, Mufti. This is a topic I have been studying; that is, inquiring about following a madhhab and what to say to those people who say "just follow Quran and Sunnah, brother". I live in a Western country so there is no dominant school of thought here. In this case what would you say the criteria are for selecting which madhhab to follow?
As I understand from videos of scholars. It's based on what's accessible to you in your locality of the 4 schools.
But you may want to lookup this matter further.
I'd say follow hanafi madhab it's more common on Internet and in general
That's my opinion though. Do isitkhara and ask a scholar
@@User48392ur So he will practice his Islam on the internet?
@@User48392ur thats not a good reason to follow a madhhab.
Assalamualaikum shaikh....very informative and full of wisdom...really appreciate...i need to talk to you shaykh...how can i talk to you? Please.... jazakallahukhaira
www.zamzamacademy.com/ask-a-question/
masha allah great explanation
Can you do a video on where Jafari madhab fits in this? What was the interelationship between the jafaris and the other madhabs?
Wasnt jafari madhab a shia madhab
There is no jafari madhab, only shia sect. As all four schools of thought and even salafis have the same aqeedah. Shias do not.
Ni zal please ask a scholar or alim not here bc no one goin b able to give u proficient answer. Jafari madhab I heard the fiqh could be acceptable by Sunni but please ask shayukh in person and if u get answer please come back and let us know.
Ibn al-Qayyim said, "The jihaad with decisive proofs [from the Book and the Sunnah] and the tongue takes precedence over the jihaad with the sword and the spear." [Al-Jawaab us-Saheeh of Ibn Taymiyyah (1/237)].
I dont understand how do people not a madhab, even I don't follow a madhab because im searching. But, you need to follow a school when you are dealing with fiqhi matters for many situations.
ua-cam.com/video/SBlYYQb8bcc/v-deo.html
What Is Taqleed
Shaikh Shaamee Hanafee said,
“Taqleed is to take the statement of someone without the knowing the evidence.” (Aqood Rasm al-Muftee p.23)
Shaikh Ibn Humaam Hanafee said,
“Taqleed is to act upon the statement of someone whose statement does not contain any evidence, rather it is without evidence.”(Tayseer at-Tahreer)
Plz add subtitles
Can I take from all the mazhabs based on their arguments and what my mind and heart tell me is more correct?
He adresses this question at the start of Q&A
Mash Allah I was really confused with the fifth Madhhab but not shykh has clear all my daudt.
Please ask the sheikh about this fatwa. Is it authentic ?
al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya:
“It is okay for a man to see from his mother, mature daughter, sister and all other Mahram women such as grandmothers, grandchildren, paternal and maternal aunts, at their: hair, chest, locks, breasts, forearms (shoulders) and shins. It is not permissible to look at their back, stomach and the area between the navel and (including the) knees.”(Al-Fatawa al-Hindiyya, 5/328)
@@sanaullasharief5319 Yh its authentic. But refers to minimum awrah, so e.g. if a woman breastfeeds in front of a mahram, its fine.
But that doesn't mean she goes around showing her chest, as this would be clear fitnah.
One has to also take into account adaab of dress and modesty when looking at these fatwas...i.e. no harm in arms and lower leg becoming exposed whilst working, etc. but to walk around the house wearing short trousers and vests would be considered khilaf of adab and modesty
Chain of transmission of fiqh of Imam quduri. where did he get, what he got and why his age of book is away from the ones who formed the school
Imām Qudūrī studied Fiqh and Ḥadīth under Abū ‘Abdillāh Muḥammad ibn
Yaḥyā ibn al-Mahdī al-Jurjānī (d. 397 Hijri), a student of the great
& eminent jurist of the Ḥanafī Madhab, Imām Abū Bakr al-Jaṣṣāṣ
al-Rāzī (d. 370), who took from Abu l-Ḥasan al-Karkhī (d. 340), from Abu
Sa‘īd al-Barda‘ī (d. 317) from Abū ‘Alī al-Daqqāq, from Abū Sahl Mūsā
ibn Naṣr al-Rāzī from Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan al-Shaybānī (d. 189) from
Abū Ḥanīfah (d. 150), from Ḥammād ibn Abī Sulaymān (d. 120), from
Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī (d. 96), from ‘Alqamah (d. 62) and Aswad, from
‘Abdullāh ibn Mas‘ūd (d. 32) (raḍiyallāhu ‘anhum) from the Prophet
(ṣallallāhu ‘alayhi wa sallam). He would also narrate aḥādīth from
Muḥammad ibn ‘Alī ibn Suwayd and ‘Ubaydullāh ibn Muḥammad al-Jushanī.
57:00 around that time, can i mix and match was the question, my nafs says, all of these schools (4) have done their research thus if i mix and match i actually take from valid, accepted opinions, thus i don't need to research myself too much (i think that's wrong but thats the whisper i get if i hear the answer)
Emam Abu Hanifah Rahmaantul Allah alaihe, Emam Malik Rahmaantul Allah alaihe , Emam Sha'fee Rahmaantul Allah alaihe and Emam Hanbal Rahmaantul Allah alaihe Allah ta'ala preserve their sacrifices they were incarcerated because they taught the truth with no fear from the creations according to the Qur'an and Sunnah of Rasullulah Sallallahu alaihe wa Salam maa'sha Allah ta'ala I followed Abu Hanifah Rahmaantul Allah alaihe school of thought alhamdulilaah.
May Allah reward the speaker in this video.
This lecture reaffirmed my conviction of following Madhabs - something the bulk of Ummah has been doing for the past 1,400 years.
ua-cam.com/video/SBlYYQb8bcc/v-deo.html
But nowadays many laymen muslims are not educated enough and falls for the follow "quran and sunnah "only ...dont follow any mullah ,alim,mufti...they easily fall prey to salafi preachers ...how can u follow quran and hadith by yourself?we are not even qualified
Right bc not every one is goin be a scholar. Just don’t be a madhab bigot! I have salafi and madhab teachers.
I can’t even thank you enough. So well put together and thank you for telling us how to deal with this fitna because I see it a lot in America
The bulk of Ummah has been following a Mazhab for the past 1,400 years. It's just so ignorant of those people
People are becoming dumber and illogical nowadays especially young westerners
@@tazboy1934 ikr
@@tazboy1934 they are getting brainwashed from Salafis. My teacher who is an Alim said something like "Some people who go to Saudi Arabia and come back and call everyone Bidah" The reason why is because they get brainwashed from them. Suadi Arabia is inclined to Hambli, but there are Salafis there too. The Imams of Mekka aren't Salafis too they are all Hambli
In the above video , it looks Mufti Abdur-Rahman ibn Yusuf has shaved his mustaches (mou'nch).
What is the sunnah? to shave it clean or to trim.
Trim
Jazaak Allah Muti Saab
The most famous student of Imam Abu Hanifa , Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan al-Shaybani was just 18 years (in 767 CE), when , Abu Hanifa died after having taught him for only two years. After Abu Hanifa's death, he had other prominent teachers as well: Sufyan al-Thawrī and al-Awzāʿī. He also later visited Medina, and studied for two to three years with Malik b. Anas.
Can we call Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan al-Shaybani a 'muqallid' of Abu Hanifa only or of the four teachers, Abu Hanifa,Sufyan al-Thawrī and al-Awzāʿī and Malik bin Anas?
Al-Shaybani isn't considered a muqallid, but a mujtahid fi al-madhab. He agreed with the principles established by Abu Hanifa (ra), but often differed in the conclusions he reached. Many of the accepted opinions of the school take the opinion of al-Shaybani or Abu Yusuf over that of Abu Hanifa (ra).
@@jpaqon u r correct
Jazaakallahu khairan
explained very clearly.
Wslm muftisaap, Yunus from Cape Town, we miss you hadrat, gatbys are so lekker in the south, make a turn
+Omar Afroz 1) As I stated somewhere else on this thread referring to the same JAAHIL, "Ignorance is a MAJOR calamity" & had he possessed any TRUE knowledge of THIS Deen, he WOULDN'T have given ALL his deeds away by SLANDERING that which he knows absolutely NOTHING about BUT this is what happens when one has been afflicted with the DISEASE of IGNORANCE
2) According to MANY Ahaadith regarding the BIDATIES of this Ummat, "ALLAH DEPRIVES THEM OF MAKING TAUBAH" & this is because they believe their acts of wickedness & evil to be acts of piety & goodness worthy of reward hence we see JAAHILS like the BIDATIE being spoken of carrying out acts of wickedness & evil assuming he's doing acts of goodness & piety worthy of reward. This is a typical characteristic found in ALL people of BID'AH
May Allah Ta'ala save us!!
Brother Mu´Meen Iam not a scholar but would like to say a few things.
Please read the book which I have posted, I have really benefited from it about my understanding about Madhabs.
Secondly when you say Imam Abu hanifa was muqallid you also create a doubt that is prevailing that he was a blind follower ( which people say that Muqallid is Blind following, its another matter to talk about).
He the Imam never cooked the madhab in his house, But everything was from the quran and sunnah.
The school has few rules and they based their research on it, he had many students who were very capable and adhered to the quran and sunnah. The school grew and the following was also huge.
People at that time and to this age allege the personality of Imam abu hanifa due to hatred, in one way or the other way or many ways collectively. But the school thrived and exists even centuries after his death.
He never claimed or asked people to follow him.
Everything is according to quran and sunnah and when they got any hadiths in any matter, they always kept the word of the prophet as the first preference ( Never challanged the hadith). When they found the hadiths years after his death they changed their view and respected the prophets word in every matter of deen.
Its a great school, great history and great personalities to back up. If you eleminate these personalities totally, you can see atleast 40 percent of hadiths will be eliminated from the 6 major collection.
The concept of I am right and they are wrong behind the mind has builds up the heat amoung common people. earlier scholars used to debate the difference of opinion, now a days self styled scholars have taken the torch.
I never see these self educated scholars building their own home as engineers or performing operation of their family members acting as doctors.
iam talking about your defending that abu hanifa was muqallid of hammad, and so on
It'll probably be best if you read the entire conversation that I was having with the Ghair-Muqalid BIDATIE
ALSO the word "Muqalid" doesn't mean "blind following", that's the definition that these BIDATIE Ghair-Muqalids came up with
IF we were to take "their" definition into consideration, then I'm a PROUD BLIND FOLLOWER of Hadhrat Imam Abu Hanifah {Rahmatullah Alayh} & his followers of the SALAF-e-SALIH who codified the teachings of the SAHABAH {Radhiyallahu Ta'ala Anhumma} living in Iraq
+Af'Waun Al-HaNaFi Mu'Meen True my brother :)
@@AfwaunMuMeen I'm Hanafi too bro your knowledgable refuting these bitch jahil youngster ghair muqallid. For 1200 years people followed a school of thought and Salafi is a new thing
Majority or minority is not a criteria.
Accommodation to guidance rests with Allaah. His infinite wisdom and justice rules that only few believe, and many disbelieve, as He says: "Most men will not believe even though you eagerly desire it." (Qur'aan - 12:102) And: "But few of My slaves are grateful." (Qur'aan - 34:13)
A Messenger should not be considered a failure if most of his people do not believe, nor should he be considered unsuccessful if the majority of the people denounced him; his duty was to convey the Message.
the 4 guided mazhabs and its thousands of ulamas following their methodology are The Sawaid Al A, zam, ie The Right Majority. If they are wrong, then Nothing is right. Understand this Very Carefully. may Allah protect this ummah especially in this times of Fitnah and Jahil among muslims
+musiclagu
What do you mean by 'guided mazhabs'?
Yes mowlana traveling really helps and our beloved Shaykh and scholar Abu Haneefah (rahimahullah) did not get the opportunity like the rest. In his case the muslim community was increasing in Koofah and so were the questions. The hadith were not keeping up so its absence he rightfully resorted to ijthihad with the exemption clause "if an hadith is authentic that is my madhab" - may Allaah grant my beloved Shaykh Abu Haneefah Jannathul Firdouse and rectify the condition of all his blind followers.
HANAFEES and SHA'FA'EES
Hanafis, who were also referred to as people of Iraq, were called Ahlur Ray in the second century of Islamic history as against the others who were called Ahle Hadith. The distinction between the two was that while the former thought that it was preferable to base one’s religious opinion on ra’y (opinion based on analogy) in the light of Qur’an and sunnah than on the weak source of khabare wahid (information from one or a few individuals which is what hadith is), Ahle Hadith, Imam Shafi being the most prominent amongst them, thought that hadith should get preference over ra’y.
More of a pro Hanafi talk. May bless the mufti for bringing this out. The Hanbals may be less in quantity but they are the best in quality. The Hanbali has produced the most outstanding scholars like no other school of thought.
Because he's got a hanafi crowd in front of him so he's going to talk hanafi
We do recognise how great he is
@@ArifRahman-te8ry yeah right
"One of the greatest distinctions of the Salaf (early generaations) was indicated by ibn al-Haaj when he said words to the effect, 'In the days of the Salaf, when the masses would introduce an innovation, the scholars would take it upon themselves to expose its falsehood. As for the scholars of the Khalaf, (laterr generations)you will find that when someone from the masses, the rulers, or the wealthy introduce an innovation, the scholars would take it upon themselves to encourage it, defend it and justify it.'
SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE REFERRING TO THAT SALAFI GARBAGE BEING PROMOTED IN THESE TIMES THAT NO-ONE BUT A FEW IS SPEAKING UP AGAINST
@@AfwaunMuMeen and I see that bitch commenting so many comments he has no life
@@AfwaunMuMeen I'm saying it to sanuallah not you btw
@@furious7754 dont use bad word...plus he misunderstood that statement he wrote...as long as it does not goes against sharia ,there are five type of biddah
very beautiful
Salafi Manhaj has been totally misunderstood.
May Allah-swt guide all of us to real manhaj(that of salaf)-Ameen...
The modern salafi school is not the same as the old one..the laymen can be easily be deceived by it
@@tazboy1934 Calm down no need to go on every comment
Much love to all the four emam no fifth nothing
A great video to see and ponder upon.
Brother Omar please read this book on Imam Abu hanifa
archive.org/details/ImamAbuHanifa--alhamdulillah-library.blogspot.in.pdf
Another book on this topic is by Hafiz Dhahabhi which ``
The Virtues of Imam Abu Hanifa and his two Companions Abu Yusuf and Muhammad Ibn Al-Hasan
``
+a kazi jazakAllah khair dear brother. I will read it In sha Allah
Was Abu Hanifa a 'mar'jiee'?
Sheikh Abdul Qadir Jeelani(Peeran e Peer) and Imam Abu Haneefa
Al Ghaneeya page 90 Volume 1 Part 2 Rasul said my Umamh will be divided in the 73 Sects only will attain Paradise others in Hell.of the 73 Sects there are 10 including la Marhaba.la Marhaba is the 10th Fiqh including Fiqha Hanafi
Shaykh Abdul Qadir Jilanis deemed Abu Hanifa and his followers to be in the fire Whilst discussing the Sects that are in the Fire, Shaafi scholar- Ghaneeyuth al Talibeen pages 62 63 (printed in Egypt):
There exist 12 sects of the marijee the Jahimiyya, Saleheeya, Shamneeya, Yunuseeya, Yuhnaaniya, Bukharia, Gilania, Shahbibeeya, Hanafeeya, Mahzeeya, Muriseeya, Kharameeya. These are all Marijee as they believe that once an individual has recited the Shahada, no matter how many sins you then commit, you will attain paradise, since iman is connected with heart not with ones deeds, practices are a part of the Sharia iman remains stagnant. People cannot supercede others on iman, the iman of Prophets, Angels and ordinary people are equal, iman neither goes up nor down, it does not lessen by words that are recited, even an individual fails to practice he remains a momin. Imam Numan bin Thabit stated that iman comprises of recognizing Allah, his Rasul (s) and Angels.
sanaulla sharief
90112: Who are the saved group? Shaykh Muhammad Saalih al-Munajjid
islamqa.info/en/90112
why does this salafi scholar not inline with what you have copied. Shaykh jilani was a hanbali, a muqallid, was he not...
If he was why do u bring a muqallids statement as a support.
Please find scholars who were ghair muqallids only. so that we find to know who these scholars are and also how many they are..
Why hidaya and other books of fiqh thought in ahle hadeeths madrasas. bring fatwas from all these madrasa that they do not include fiqh and then you keep defending your views.
The 73 sects are based on the aqiads and not madhabs. please solve this basic understanding to not indulge in debate. when its well known that the 73 sects are regarding aqaid.
If one understands it as the madhabs then its his wrong understanding go to a scholar and get it understood right.
In the Qur’aan, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
“Verily, as for those whom the angels take (in death) while they are wronging themselves (as they stayed among the disbelievers even though emigration was obligatory for them), they (angels) say (to them): “In what (condition) were you?” They reply: “We were weak and oppressed on the earth.” They (angels) say: “Was not the earth of Allaah spacious enough for you to emigrate therein?” Such men will find their abode in Hell - what an evil destination!”
[al-Nisa’ 4:97]
What's mr muftis opinion on this.
Excellent talk. Has he done one on the various aqeedah schools?
Yes...he himself is a maturidi /ashari
Superb mashaallah, I only wanted to watch a few minutes but ended up watching nearly all of it.
It's a mistake to say the schools developed into four organically.... The rulers in particular had a great influence. The early scholars did not always agree to famous four.... Some would say 3 fiqh schools excluding hanbal is, others would exclude hanafis from ahlus sunnah as late as shaykh abdul qadir jilani due to definition of iman..... Some books contained biased narrations against imams due to theological differences or reports.... For example some of the hanabilah had a bias against mutazili hanafis who were in charge of the mihna against their imam... This led to bias that is seen in some of the books. The schools spread organically but the leaders had a massive influence
Mu'tazili hanafis? That's a contradiction in terms. You fail to see that it was Allah's swt rahmah His mercy that they big Four developed out of quite a few schools of jurisdiction/law . the awzai school the zahiri the layth b sa'ad school died out and the 4 famous ones survived. The merit of these schools alone that made a lot if sense which was the primary factor in their instant success even with the rulers at the time. Even Imam Bukhari tried his hand at Fiqh but it never found success with either the students of Fiqh or the Ulama during his time
SULTAN MAHMUD GHAZNAVI and FIQH HANAFI.
"Tarikh Yafii Miratul Jinan Ulama of Islam note Guznawi was Hanafi and reaspected Hadith and he would hear Hadith with his people which is why found them in accordance to Shafii Madhab something affected his heart and he inquired which was better of the two, and he said that the two two rakaat Salats are read before him then hed decide on which was better. Kafaal Muroozi read the Shaafi prayer and read it in such a way showing it in accordance with Wudhu clean dress (under Shaafi principles). Then Faqaal Muroozi read prayer according to Hanafi fiqh he wore coloured dogs skin and a quarter of it was impure and yet he performed Wudu in achohol prepare by dates, as it was summer time he was covered by flies and mosquitos and performed each action of Wudhu in reverse, then he looked towards Kaaba and said Takbeer in Farsi without the intention and then read one verse in Farsi, and performed like a cock pecking its food, in his Salaams rather saying Tashud he farted loudly, and said Oh King this is Abu Hanifas Salaat. King said that if this is unproven to be Abu Hanifa I will kill you, because such a Namaaz is not accepted by any religion. Hanafis denied that this was Hanafi Salaat. The King said present the books of both Madhabs to me, the King gor a Christian accountant to examine both. After research it was poroven that the Hanafi Salat was just like that of Faqaal Ghuznawi then lefy Hanafi Madhab and became Shaafi.
This event is authentic and has even. It had been confirmed as correct by the Hanafi scholar Abdul Razzaq Hanafi in his book Sayf Maslool fi Dhurbul kafaal wal Mukful. His comments are cited in Astaghsa page 180 where Abdul Razzaq initially said he initially felt it was an exaggeration but when he read Abu Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Sad al Yahfeez Tarikh al Janaan in which the Imam of Makka confirmed the farting episode he knew it was true.
Alhamdulilah ta ala
Its really smart of you mowlana you bring the issue of the kiss and ways and means of trying to reconcile it. How about this mowlana? The Prophet of Allah clearly said "Do not pray the Witr like Salathul Maghrib and to this date the blind-followers of the Hanafi madhhab do just that in total defiance. Answer this question my dearest mowlana.
There is no loud tilawah of the Qur'an in the third rakah of Maghrib, whereas in witr there is. Hopefully you're not too ignorant now
Tq mufti. Sometimes muslim too strict no willing to accept other person view
GOING IN JAMATH TABLIEGH--And the people in the time of the Messenger sallalahu alaihi wa sallam were in greater need of knowledge since they were surrounded by the unbelievers. So he, sallalahu alaihi wa sallam, would send a knowledgeable one and not send ten or twenty along with him who did not know anything. Rather they would learn from the people of knowledge in their own lands.
So I am sure you all know that he, sallalahu alaihi wa sallam, sent Mu’aadh Ibn Jabal (raliallahu anhu), alone, Aboo Moosa (raliallahu anhu) alone, and likewise ‘Alee (raliallahu anhu), Aboo ‘Ubaidhah (raliallahu anhu) and Dihyah (raliallahu anhu) etc. etc. all singly. We do not find at any time in his blessed life that he, sallalahu alaihi wa sallam, sent along with a scholar, people who were not scholars - to Yemen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rasool e Akram did not sent a group of people with low knowledge of religion with a story book for 'talemm' and 'dawah'. Hr sent just one learned person.
Taleem are for spiritual growth
Shaikh Shaah Waleeullaah Muhaddith Dehlwee said,
“The general people especially nowadays in every place will be seen to be adherent to a particular madhab of the earlier scholars. They think that if a person leaves his madhab of the Imaam he does taqleed in any one issue then it is as if he has left the religion. So they consider their Imaams to be Prophets that have been sent and they consider and hold it obligatory for him to do taqleed of the Imaam, whereas the people of this ummah before the fourth century were not adherent to a particular madhab.” (at-Tafheemaat al-Aalhiyyah (1/206), Hujjatullah al-Baalighaah (1/445)
Think we all muslim follow 4 imams so nwaday we dont need 5 madha in fitna time
They pray like the prophet not differently to hanfi.
Someone is permitted to follow a madhab not blind follow it, understand mowlana? When the truth reaches him he changes this position, this way he or she has followed the Sunnah and not a madhab. If the individual persists with the incorrect way after the truth is clearly conveyed to him then he commits kufr this is according to Sh Sa'lih Al-Uthaymeen (rahimahullah). There is consensus on this according to scholars of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa‘ah. Mowlana remember the statement "if an hadeeth is authentic that is my madhab"
The fifth madhab is Dhahiri madhab.
Some of the things mentioned here by Mufti Abdur-Rahman make sense. That said, I think that he and others like him have misunderstood the salafi movement. Indeed, trying to build another madhab by reading isolated texts in English translations is nonsense, but that's not what salafism is about. Yes, salafism is about going back to the original sources, Qur'an and Sunna, but I have never met any salafist acting the way he described. Most refer to the need of looking back to them in Arabic, and almost (almost, because there are deviated thinkers in all schools) always refer to imams in the different schools. The point is to recover the teachings in its purest form, as much as possible, rather than just following what such and such said. Commentaries and fatwas made by the different scholars may be important (very, sometimes), but should not be the basis for any Muslim's behaviour. And as far learning is concerned, even prominent imams say that when a Muslim is learning, he is free (and it's better for him) to start by one madhab, only that not dogmatically, and always paying attention to the possibility that the truth might lie elsewhere. You don't have to be a mujtahid to do that.
ua-cam.com/video/SBlYYQb8bcc/v-deo.html
They claim to go back to the Quran and Sunnah and end up with scholars of the later generation. Ibn Baz, Ibn Taymiyah and Alban. That is academic fraud of the highest order. If you want to go back to the original you can't mix the four scholars behind those madhab.
Today there are mainly exists 4 madhaibs. But there more than that before and after the 4 Imams. We follow madhab based on evidence, if theres no evidence on an issue in our madhab, and the other madhab has it, then we go with the other madhab...i.e. we follow the hadeeth whoever has it, as long as Muhadditoon said it is saheeh. Unless theres a conflict of authenticity amongst them, then we take what we are comfortable with. As for the isnad, chain of narration that only for the Muhadditoon. As for saying one must follow one particular madhab and cant accept another, even if your own madhab has no evidence and on top contradicts the hadeeth, then this is misguidance.
There is no such thing as "madhab has no evidence and on top contradicts the hadeeth."
Maybe to the uneducated fool this seems like the case, but rest assured scholars don't want to ruin their hereafter by making up rulings like you think they do.
@@n.a3642 It's not about Scholars making up a ruling, giving a fatwa on an issue...they gave ruling based on what evidence that was available to them at the time, the proof they knew and came across...and on an issue where they did not came across any evidence, they gave their view by doing ijtihad. So will get two reward if correct, and one if not. THEY ALSO knew if an evidence is found in the future or they are not aware of, so they said follow the hadeeth and reject their opinion that contradicts the hadeeth....it very simple to understand. Wa lillah hil hamdh
@@AbuMoosaa First you say:
"even if your own madhab has no evidence"
Then you say:
"they gave ruling based on what evidence that was available to them at the time"
First make up your mind and then maybe you can talk about things you have no knowledge about.
@@n.a3642 Brother, what part of my comments do you not understand? Read carefully, evidence given , we follow. No evidence given, we do not follow. If there's ikhtilaf, both side have evidence, then we take what we are comfortable with. And leave the research on isnad to the Muhadditoon
@@AbuMoosaa You just keep falling in contradictions don't you.
>"It's not about Scholars making up a ruling"
- Says scholars don't just make up rulings
>"No evidence given, we do not follow."
- Implies scholars/madhabs hold positions that don't have evidence.
Please brother I understand you still have not come out of the propaganda of the 90's unlike most people who have, but at least don't waste time spreading this disease onto others. You're not doing the Ummah any favor.
As you said: "If there's ikhtilaf, both side have evidence, then we take what we are comfortable with."
Yes just do that.
I want to make my child Muhammad mustafa as your student. Is there any way . I am ready to relocate
Abu Hanifa (born 80 hijri) took up the 'fiqh' as a career in 120 hijri, when he was already 40 years old.
TILL THAT AGE OF 40, WAS HE A MUQALLID or GHAIR-MUQALLID?
Hadhrat IMAM ABU HANIFAH {Rahmatullah Alayh} was the MUQALID of Hadhrat HAMMAD ibn Abi Sulaiman {Rahmatullah Alayh} who was the MUQALID of Hadhrat IBRAHIM al-Nakha’i {Rahmatullah Alayh} who was the MUQALID of Hadhrat ABDULLAH ibn MASOOD {Radhiyallahu Ta'ala Anhu} who was the MUQALID of RASULULLAH {Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam} JAAHIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU have done NOTHING but EXPOSE your own STUPIDITY over & over & over again under the SATANIC guise of being apart of the intelligentsia by copy/pasting statements attributed to MUQALID Scholars
A JAAHIL who's PROPAGATING the ABANDONMENT of TAQLEED so we can make TAQLEED of YOU & your STUPID peers of BIDATIES & DEVIATES (that's NIFAAQ jaahil)
A JAAHIL who's PROPAGATING the ABANDONMENT of TAQLEED yet find it scholastically permissible to quote & use as PROOF those who adhered to the SAME methodology that you're PROPAGATING AGAINST
You're a JAAHIL, POINT BLANK. A JAAHIL who has NO continious Chain/Isnaad leading back to the Prophet {Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam} OR any one from the Salaf for that matter
A JAAHIL who adopted a KUFFAAR ENTITY such as GOOGLE to be YOUR Sheikh & Guide in Islam
A JAAHIL who is nothing but ONE of the MANY signsa of the LAST DAYS
YOUR NIFAAQ IS OBVIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JAAHIL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*****
Abu Hanifa was not a 'muqallid' but a student of Hammad.
The students of Abu Hanifa differed with their teacher on many issues. Do you think, they can be called muqallid?
THEY were ORDERED/COMMANDED by THEIR TEACHER IMAM ABU HANIFAH to DIFFER with him IF they came across a SAHIH AHAADITH that contradicted his Fatawa & STILL they adhered to & PROPAGATED the HANAFI MADHHAB
JAAHIL
*****
Do you mean, even if they come across a 'sahih hadees', they were commanded to to adhere to Hanafi madhab?
So, that is 'usul e karkhee'
YOUR IGNORANCE/BIASING & LOYALTY to the DEVIATES you follow is LITERALLY BLINDING you to REALITY
MY WORDS:
"THEY were ORDERED/COMMANDED by THEIR TEACHER IMAM ABU HANIFAH to DIFFER with him IF they came across a SAHIH AHAADITH"
DID I SAY THAT OR DID I SAY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU THINK I SAID
14:00
24:00
AsSalamUAlaikum!
This speaker is adapting issues of fiqh amongst the Sahaba to justify following Madhab.
When the Prophet Peace be upon him said about following what "he and his companions are upon" and "follow the majority" he was addressing the Sahaba. This means we follow the majority amongst the Sahaba, not in today's time.
This speakers discussion around fiqh is not nailing the issue amongst the Muslim's today.
Some Muslim's believe Allah is above all of creation, some believe Allah everywhere, some go to graves to ask dead men to intercede (yet they don't know where that dead man is, Heaven or Hell), some believe the Prophet is in the Barzagh, some believe he is visiting and leaving the world and looking down upon us etc. These issues severe and problematic as people fall into Shirk, Bidah.
I was brought up as, and use to follow Deoband, only to realise they are Deobandi and they are not following Any Haneefa, rather just in Fiqh.
We have to take the understanding that Allah has given us in the Quran, the Prophet and the first three generations after him. We need to get off our lazy backsides and learn Arabic. Allah says time and time again He has given us the Quran as guidance so that we may understand, yet we leave our understanding to other men, instead of reading and understanding ourselves. We have to learn Hadith and take the understanding of the Majority amongst the Sahaba, not majority in our time as the religion is not based upon numbers, but rather correct understanding.
We as Muslim's need to chase the religion more emphatically than when we chase women and money or we will be in great loss in the hereafter!
ua-cam.com/video/SBlYYQb8bcc/v-deo.html
@@user-mo4mm1yn6q The link you left is a very vague response and I don't know what the relevance is to my post. Deobandi only follow the fiqh of Abu Haneefah, but their Aqeedah is Sufi/ Ashari/ Maturidi. I was raised in the Deoband school of thought, my grandfather was a Deobandi scholar so I know all about it. We are not talking about fiqh as this is based on hadeeth and it's authenticity regardless which imam we take it from. The issue is Aqeedah.
@@baz28k the aqeedah of maturidi and ashari are correct and followed by majority for thousand of year muslims follow ashari and maturidi creed then come the psedo salafi sect who claim muslims were wrong for thousand of years...wen the prophet saw said otherwise...this is a very cunning trap that many laymen can easily get fooled by ...dont fall for the salafi
The Salafi mazhab is not the originally recognised fifth mazhab! That one was the same the Prophet mentioned in his ahaadeeth as found in SUNNI books and sources. So allow me to quote
from these recognised SUNNI scholars which followers (therefore which mazhab) the Prophet himself mentioned in good favour in his ahaadeeth:
يا علي أبشر فإنك و أصحابك و شيعتك في الجنَّة
The Prophet of Allah (S) said:"Glad tidings O ‘Ali! Verily you and your companions and your Shi’a (followers) will be in Paradise."
Some Sunni references:1) Fadha’il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p655; 2) Hilyatul Awliyaa, by Abu Nu’aym, v4, p329; 3) Tarikh, by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadi, v12, p289; 4) al-Awsat, by al-Tabarani; 5) Majma’ al-Zawa’id, by al-Haythami, v10, pp 21-22; 6) al-Darqunti, who said this tradition has been transmitted via many different authorities; 7) al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar Haythami , Ch. 11, section 1, p247;
شيعة علي هم الفائزون يوم القيامة
The Messenger of Allah (S) said: "The Shi’a of ‘Ali shall be victorious on the day of resurrection/rising"
Sunni references:1)al-Manaqib Ahmad, as mentioned in:(a) Yanabi al-Mawaddah, by al-Qundoozi al-Hanafi, p62; (b) Tafsir al-Durr al-Manthoor, by al-Hafidh Jalaaluddin al-Suyuti, who quotes the tradition as follows: "We were with the Holy Prophet when ‘Ali came towards us. The Holy Prophet said: He and his Shi’a will acquire salvation on the day of judgement."
[The "day of rising / resurrection ” may also refer to the day of rising of al-Mahdi (ahhs). But in more general term, it means the "day of judgement".]
Also it is narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: "O ‘Ali! On the Day of Judgement I shall resort to Allah and you will resort to me and your children will resort to you and the Shi’a will resort to them. Then you will see where they carry us. (i.e. to Paradise)"
Sunni reference: Rabi al-Abrar, by al-Zamakhshari
Furthermore, it is also recorded that the Prophet said (as stated by al-Tabraani in "al-mu'jam-ul-awsaat"): روى الحافظ الطَّبـراني (ت 360 هـ) في "المعجم الأوسط" (4 / 187) بسنده عن الإمام عليٍّ عليه السلام، قال: "إنَّ خليلي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال: يا عليُّ؛ إنَّك ستقدم على الله وشيعتَكَ راضين مَرضيِّينَ، ويقدم عليه عدوُّك غضاباً مُقمَحين ... ". وعنه المتَّقي الهندي في "كنز العمال": (13 / 156)، والشريف السمهودي في "جواهر العقدين": ص265 .
"O ‘Ali! (On the day of Judgement) you and your Shi’a will come toward Allah well-pleased and well-pleasing, and there will come to Him your enemies angry and stiff-necked (i.e., their head forced up = مُقمَحين).
Sunni references:1) al-Tabarani, on the authority of Imam ‘Ali in "al-mu'jam-ul-awsaat"; 2)al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, ch. 11, section 1, p236 [Please refer to the Quran for the use of the word ""muqmahoon / muqmaheen": إِنَّا جَعَلۡنَا فِىٓ أَعۡنَـٰقِهِمۡ أَغۡلَـٰلاً۬ فَهِىَ إِلَى الۡأَذۡقَانِ فَهُم مُّقۡمَحُونَ (سُوۡرَةُ یسٓ,٨) " innaa ja'alnaa fee a'naaqihim aghlaalan fahiya ilal azqaani fahum muqmahoon" (Surah Yaaseen, verse8. سُوۡرَةُ یسٓ,٨)]
Opposing this view, as expressed by the Prophet were the followers of the Quraish and many of your "exalted" shaabah!
“Taqleed is in itself an innovation which started in latter times as we know there was no madhab during the era of the companions……”
(E’qaaz Humam Oolul al-Absaar of Allaamah Fulaanee (p.74).
ua-cam.com/video/SBlYYQb8bcc/v-deo.html
Not all innovation are bad as long as its not against the sharia ...as i have heard
Which sahaba read hadith books ?...so it's clearly a case of necessary innovations and unnecessary.... that has to occur due to changes in the physical world and the natural progression that takes place . Ie ..if people relocated to mars in 50 years time ..how do we pray towards qabah when the planets are rotating etc ....just a extreme example but to make my point with emphasis
By Allah, this is so true! One of the Deoband students I use to know (now an Imam in a Masjid) told me I am an innovator for taking knowledge from Bukhari and Muslim because Sahaba didn't follow Hadith. After I finished laughing I gave him narrations of Sahaba learning narrations from each other, and teaching narrations after the Messenger (Peace be upon him) had passed away. Like ... Abu Huraira, Ibn Masud, etc etc. He looked confused and walked off.
Cause deobandi are munafiqs. ..sly cult ..worst cult in the fitna groups. ..see how they still celebrate eid with their real master's Saudi wahab of Arabia. . ..same coin different side
@@nazadam7066 lol have u studied the works of ulaama e deoband
@@ArifRahman-te8ry lol I'm laughing at how stupid he is
If you have any wrongs , misconceptions about Deobandi ulama
you can clear yourself by watching the videos
ua-cam.com/play/PLNl3MM1myaRGEgPRppcARmTsY8kXCNpJf.html
Wat are u talking...u most probably lying...i myself go to deobandi mosque and listen to bukhari hadith every day...why u people have hatred toward deobandi sunni?
Fear Allah
If some one wants to debate about Islam, they should leave it to the people who have knowledge. This is the problem today, we have under educated youth trying to argue about aqeedah and fiqh issues. These pseudo-salafi/talafi/madkhali what ever you want to call them make it hard for the other people who want to follow the true methodology of slafiyyah.
What has fire raging in communities got to do with striving to learn the correct Sunnah? Or is this another clever attempt to consolidate taqleed (to follow the Hanafi madhhab) in communities if not the entire world without much allusion. This is disgraceful.
Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz , Mufti Azam of Saudia said anout Tablighi Jamat:
Jamaa’at al-Tableegh do not have proper understanding of the issues of ‘aqeedah, so it is not permissible to go out with them, except for one who has knowledge and understanding of the correct ‘aqeedah of Ahl al-Sunnah wa'l-Jamaa'ah, so that he can guide them and advise them, and cooperate with them in doing good, because they are very active, but they need more knowledge and someone who can guide them of those who have knowledge of Tawheed and the Sunnah. May Allaah bless us all with proper understanding of Islam and make us steadfast in adhering to it. Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz, 8/331
+sanaulla sharief Mr Sanaulla looks like you are everywhere lighting the fires and do not have the fire brigade at hand. Have fear of Allah stop lighting the fires. You got a good name Masha Allah make good use of it by uniting the Ummah not breaking them apart by your fires on the social media. Allah guide you.
+Hussain Carrim
Did I quote anything without reference?
+Hussain Carrim
What should be the duty of a Muslims, when some one promotes heretic deviant beliefs ? For example, the mufti e azam of Deoband writes,
CONCEPTION WITHOUT SEX
The lineage of a child whose parents are worlds apart
Imaam Muhammad was asked: “The nikaah of a man who lives in the east and a woman who lives in the west is contracted through a letter. The distance between the two places is such that it cannot be traversed in under six months. If the wife gives birth six months after the nikaah (the shortest period of pregnancy) will the
child be legitimate?”
He replied that the child would be legitimate. When asked as to how this could be possible, he replied, “Yes! We do believe in the miracles of the auliyaa (pious.)”page 80Title of the Book : Malfoozaat of Faqeeh-ul-Ummat Mufti Mahmood Hasan Gangohi
Compiled by: Mufti Farooq Meeruti Sahib (daamat barakaatuhum)
Published by: Madrasah Taleemuddeen 4 Third Avenue P.O.Box 26393 Isipingo Beach Durban 4115 South Africa
+sanaulla sharief I think you did not get me are u a an adult or a child if you have to make yourself a fool of yourself on the web then go ahead you will get a prize for this.
Hussain Carrim
What do you think about the so called 'ulma e Deoband, fools or genius ?
Qiyas and assumptions.
What has fasting and whether one is fasting or not got to do with clarifying the truth? Mowlana you're indulging in deceptive talk. Prophet of Allah (sallallaahu alayhiwa sallam).virtually destroyed a person's Salah and told him to go and pray again as he had not prayed until he pleaded with the Prophet to tell him how to pray. So learned Mowlana according to you we should close our eyes and shut our mouths and just walk away. This is another subtle way to enthrone blind followers and blind following.
• Weather you believe or not, our creed (aqeeda) ,and ibadat (Worshipping Method) is widely divided into several sects. Not only every group, believing on, that they are right, BUT every person practically believe that he is right, and perfect, so he is acting accordingly.
• Blind Faith:
• When they are told to follow the (Revelation) that has sent down, they say: nay, we shall follow the ways that we found our fathers (following). What if it is Satan beckoning them to the Penalty of the (Blazing) Fire? [Al_Quraan_031.021]
• Remember, Islaam spread from Makkah al-Mukarramah ( مكة المكرمة) to the rest of the world and not the other way.
• Take an example, if a new person becomes Muslim, from north west (ALASKA, USA) or south west (Argentina) or North East(Japan) or South East (New Zealand or Australia), What method of worship he should follow???. Why we are creating so many confusions to new Muslims??? When will we open our eyes???
• In India, Pakistan, and Iran we have Shia, Brelwee, Dewbandi, AhleHadees and much more. Every group saying they are really following Quraan and Sunnah and every group is giving clear reference from Quraan and Hadiths.
• Where should this new muslim go to learn the method of worshiping, Saudia, Yemen, Morocco, India, Pakistan, or Iran.???
Following a country is not in fiqh. You can follow an madhhab imam.
To sum up:
1. Ahle Hadis/Salafi brothers are (blindly) following Imam Ibn Taimiyah/Sheikh Albani/Inb Baz/Salih Al Usaimin's interpretation of Quran and Sunnah.
2. Salafi Movement is actually a Khalafi Movement.
As Sheikh Albani/Inb Baz/Salih Al Usaimin are junior to Four Imams.
3. Salafi brothers are dealing with texts only, where Imams dealt with texts as well as context. They had the opportunity to learn from Sahaba and other tabeyi (RA)
ua-cam.com/video/oXMgSikl8qU/v-deo.html
Promoting Hanafi school of thought
ua-cam.com/video/J6QtEa-36Ps/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/Me1l1QdtQeo/v-deo.html
The below links are shared with you , kindly watch it and give me feedback thanks brother.
beating around the bush and wanting an audience
waste of time
pls google the wahabi radical
What is that
how come you prefer imam abu hanifa over bukhari's authentic hadith, then when it comes to marrying 9 year old Aaisha in bukhari you unequivocally accept it. Which one hurts the prophet more?
1) Because Imam Abu Hanifah {Rahmatullah Alayh} who was a TABIEEN came on the scene OVER 100 years BEFORE Imam BUKHARI Al Shafi'i {Rahmatullah Alayh} who was a TABI'TABIEEN
2) Because MANY of Imam Bukhari's Sheikhs & teachers in Hadith were HANAFIS i.e, following the Madhhab of Imam Abu Hanifah
3) Because Imam Bukhari did NOT compile the Ahaadith in Book form to correct the Shariah that was ALREADY perfected, completed & existing, he compiled the Ahaadith in Book form for the prosperity of the FUTURE generations in order to PRESERVE/PROTECT the Ahaadith
4) Because what was SAHIH according to Imam Abu Hanifah reached Imam Bukhari OVER 100 years LATER which may have had some effect on the people in the Isnaad/Chain of transmission. EVERYONE of KNOWLEDGE knows that the ACCEPTANCE of a HADITH by the FUQAHA is the STAMP OF IT'S AUTHENCITY
5) Imam Bukhari knew OVER 500,000 Ahaadith but ONLY recorded a little over 12,000 in his respected Kitaab, he ALSO mentions in the intorduction of his Kitaab that these are NOT ALL the SAHIH Ahaadith
AND THE LIST GOES ON
Again propaganda against salafis . This is how you guys try to mislead muslims . You tried to say that the people who say we should follow only Qur'an and sunnah are basically those who say we should just read the Qur'an and hadeeths by ourselves or take the understandings of salafi ulemas.
The fact is salafis have a manhaj which is we would not follow one particular madhab rather we would follow the our salafs which are most closer to Qur'an and sunnah.
Our salafs means the pious professors which includes together with prophet s.a.w sahabas tabiens taba tabiens and all the imams .
If we have something which prophet s.a.w did and something which a sahabi did and then the imams followed it then a new imam came and took us to what prophet s.a.w did then we have two choices either to follow the prophet s.a.w way or to follow the sahabi who would obviously not go against the sunnah but when we are left with a dilemma we chose the way of our prophet s.a.w and simply assume there must be some problem in understanding by the sahabi or there must be some problem with the ijtihaad etc.
If there are three opinions from three different imams and we find relevant hadees backing one imam for example abu hanifa r a regarding zakat on jewellery for women we follow his opinion and leave the other imams but when it comes to triple talaaq in one sitting we leave all the four imams and umar r.a the sahabi and go with the hadees of our prophet s.a.w which matches with command of Allah in Quran that triple talaaq is considered one talaaq because right from the beginning there were ulemas who use to consider it one although they were not from the four schools..it wasn't ibn taimiyah who first came up with this idea.
We salafis follow the four imams understandings along with the others as well and we don't fix ourselves with only one particular madhab.
If abu hanifa says there is no aqiqaa in Islam and its a bidaah we don't accept it as there is evidence available from the prophet s.a.w.
AsSalamUAlaikum SanaUllah!
Kayfa Haala Akhi? May Allah guide us all to his straight path, the path of the Messenger Muhammad Peace be upon him, with the understanding of the Sahaba and their methodology.
The Prophet Peace be upon him said...
"My Ummah will divide into 73 sects, each group in the Hellfire except for one. Those that are upon what I and my companion's are upon today. So stick with the Jama'ah (majority)"
Here it is clear that the Messenger is addressing the companions, and is referring to their Jama'ah majority (amongst the companions), yet the speaker is trying to adapt it to today's majority. Most Muslim's today don't pray Salat, don't fast, don't give Zakat, indulge in Ribah, fornicate, indulge in all forms of Zina. According to his argument this is the majority in today's Ummah.
Ahlul Bidah twist and turn with modern arguments for a religion perfected by Allah over 1400 years ago. "Al Yauma Ak Maltu Lakum, Deenukum Wa Atmamtu Alaykum Ne' Mati Waradeetu Lakumul Islama Deena" Quran (Speech of Allah).
????????? Khuraafat
He don't know about salafi school of thought , just rely upon unauthenticated sources