@Adrian it would had been nice of you to display the transition model 16550 which in my humble opinion it most sought after cream -rail dial with big font numbers
I know you don’t set Chronext’s pricing, Adrian, but just in case some poor hapless viewer is tempted to give them £17,000 for a 226570, I feel obliged to mention that they could save seven grand and head over to Chrono24. Much as I love mine, £17k is a criminal price for one of these. As well you know.
216570 was my grail, and after scraping and saving for years, and resisting the urge to scratch the itch with homages and cheaper options, it is now my daily. And I’m still so so so in love!
I have a question. That's 42mm right? Seeing that you wear it everyday I suppose the weight doesn't bother you. Are you able to comfortably wear it 6+ hours daily? I only ask because I recently went from a 40mm to a 42mm and I found the change of size and weight to be unfavorable for me. I like 42mm but I'm just wondering if in this specific case it might just be the watch and strap combination I have on it. I'm hoping I'd be able to find a comfortable 42mm. So far my 40mm is the only watch I can tolerate for 8+ hours. Thanks, Chris.
I’ve had my 226570 for over a year. I’ve come close to selling it twice because I found it heavy on the bracelet (although it’s fabulous on a NATO / MN / RubberB). Then I got a Black Bay Pro and realised just how well balanced and perfectly proportioned the Explorer II is and I haven’t looked back. Wearing it right now and loving it. I’d recommend trying and buying (although definitely not for the absurd £17k they’re asking for on Chronext).
@@CaptainYellow2085 great question. I have a 7 inch wrist, so size-wise it is close to perfect, if a hair on the large size. 40mm is the sweet spot I think. But the indices and hands are larger too, which fills the negative space so much better than a lot of 42s, and is what I think I love most about it. It’s not a thick watch, def never use the word chunky to describe it as I would with 42mm tudors. Weight wise, it’s not an issue. It’s such a well balanced well proportioned piece, I have no problem wearing it on bracelet. So to sum it up and answer your question, it is a very comfortable daily wearer.
@@SolidCaseBackThank you for your response. It's interesting that sometimes it takes another watch to put things into perspective. That's happened to me a couple of times. It's a fun journey finding what fits! Yes, I'm looking into my first Rolex soon but I'm not sure I want to pay the premium for it. Of course with a Rolex, money shouldn't really be much of a deciding factor but the principal that these are selling 5k-to10k over dealer price is absurd.
The 16570 has the most pleasing proportions to my eyes, especially with dial elements and hands. There are other improvements in the 3186 besides elimination of hand wobble. It has faster crown to quickset hour hand gearing, a lot less tedious when setting the date if you're off by weeks when setting the watch. It has a parachrom bleu hairspring as well. Basically it's the same movement that's in the ceramic gmt master IIs from 2005 to 2018
Apparently some of those changes contributed to it being less reliable and harder to service than the 3185. Or at least that's what I heard from a watchmaker
@@jordonfan1283 It's possible I suppose, but I don't think the ceramic gmts seemed to suffer any issues. Haha the watchmakers i know tend to bitch about everything but I love them!
Great video! In 2012 I bought a 2009 16570 off eBay for $2k, had it serviced, and it’s been running COSC ever since. The dimensions of the 40mm (it’s actually closer to 39mm) are perfect for my 6.75-in wrist. When Rolex came out with the 216570 I thought it was hideous. They really need to come out with a scaled back “retro” version like they did with the Explorer 1.
I have the ref 16570 black dial circa 2009. The case is beautifully refined and the size is near perfect for every day wear. Having the 3186 also gives it GMT functionality which is a bonus. The ideal travel watch as it’s not showy at all.
I purchased my Rolex explorer ll in 1993...... I elected to go with the black face...... more masculine!!!! I purchased it for two reasons..... The explorer ll was developed to celebrate Sir Edmund Hillary’s assent of Mt. Everest in 1953!!!!! Hilary was a kiwi!!!! I too am a kiwi.... hence the desire to own a watch that had a massive kiwi connection!!!! But also I’m a 007 James Bond fan!!! Been to Goldeneye in Jamaica... touched the writing desk etc etc.... Ian Fleming was a fan of Rolex..... And he wore the original Explorer Rolex watch!!!! Hence by buying an explorer ll I was paying homage to two brilliant individuals!!! I wear the watch 24/7 and that is the only piece of jewellery that I wear!!!! A total piece of vintage art work!!!! Regards Ian 👨🎤🇳🇿🏉 9:42
I tried on the current version of Rolex Explorer 2 the 42mm one. To me the orange hand felt a bit cartoony. Also felt too big for an everyday watch on my 6.5in wrists. Huge fan of the 16570 40mm version as it’s the perfect size. Of course I’d prefer the updated movement and stuff but a fusion of old and new would be ideal for me :)
I'm the same way. Wore a 40mm for the past 8 months but decided to try on a 42mm. The small change in size and weight just didn't work for me. I can only wear it for about 4 hours till it starts to bother me. My wrist fluctuates between 6 5/8 - 6 3/4. For me at least, 40mm seems to strike the perfect balance of size, weight, and wearability. I do have a Tag Heuer that I really love that's a 38mm. I also have a vintage Omega Seamaster that's a 36mm. Looks kinda tiny but it's super comfortable.
I convinced myself that I needed to get the 124270 over the 114270 because of the technical advances with the movement, better bracelet, lume, etc. It did nothing for me. Switched to a 114270 where for me the dial proportions are perfect and the other stuff doesn’t matter. Actually. The older watch keeps better time than the newer one 😀
Just got a call from Bucherer - the Explorer ii that I ordered - I've forgotten how long ago - has arrived. Colour me excited! Love this watch. Great vid Adrian.
Collected my 226570 (Black) last weekend and I'm in love! They fixed everything I disliked about the 216570. I have had a couple of 16570's previously and sold them both, the 16570 is an incredible watch; with a lot of charm, but the latest model is just better in every way and I can certainly see it being a watch that remains in my collection.
I’ve had all but the used 1655 I regrettably passed on in the late 90s. Love my 216570/226570 models. The Explorer 2 is my favorite watch. Born in 1971. Just like me. The last great tool watch.
My 16570 polar dial is one of my favorite watches. Flys under the radar so well. The new model in black is stunning but the 42mm case is so clunky. If they did the 226570 in 40mm I would have bought one on day 1.
I’m wearing my 16570 right now and pretty sure my love for it (& purchase) was influenced by your early videos Adrian! My only criticism of the newest model is that they didn’t add a quickset date (same goes for the GMT Master). When I pick this out of the box and it’s 15 days wrong, it’s really a pain in the arse to set!
Are you serious? ... it takes seconds !! just pull out the crown to position 1 and spin the hour hand round and the date soon moves on .. almost as fast as a quick set.
226570 - I got it just a few weeks ago, and I am almost surprised to realize that it is just superb. The suttle changes has made it into a monster, in a good way.
I’ve had the pleasure of trying on the 16570 and although the GMT hand is shaky it’s such a great looking watch. I personally like the proportions on it more and I have a 7 1/2 inch wrist so I can fit a 42mm comfortably. Great video as always sir. Thank you!
07:15 Well I actually really like the scratchy sound when the rotor swings. The Seamaster 300M does this as well. In my opinion it adds to the feeling of owning a mechanical watch.
I never planned to buy a Rolex, Omega in my eyes was the watch brand that I could love and afford. Now having multiple Speedmasters, a Black Bay & Santos on a whim I picked up a 16570 ver. 3. I can say it has become my absolute favorite watch. I took it off the bracelet and ordered an Everest strap but put it on a NATO while the strap was coming and it was a game changer. I've had the Everest strap sitting on my desk for months now, I just can't take it off the NATO. From someone who didn't love Rolex for many years, I am here to say the 16570 is a perfect watch.
I bought my 216570 WD years ago for way under retail. Nobody wanted this watch. Even today it is pretty much underrated compared to GMTs. The ExII is the best watch from Rolex with a white dial in my opinion. Even better than the Daytona. Perfect readability (do you say so in England?), Date, GMT function,…what else do you need? The new model has a bigger bracelet and clasp. Some may like that, but I don’t.
I still prefer the old 40mm version. My 1997 white dial Explorer II was stolen a few years ago and , as I looked for a replacement, I decided to buy the black dial version. I find it more versatile to wear than the white dial ever was.
Just got mine. 226570, love this Watch! And this video is the best I’ve seen about the Explorer II and comparison between models. Thanks and congrats for the great videos!
I have a small wrist and love the explorer line, unfortunately the 42mm models are just too big for me…..so I’ve had to settle on a 1976 1655 instead. Love it, I think it’s the most unique vintage Rolex out there.
Рік тому+1
This is a great comparison, I finally took the plunge and recently bought the 216570 variation. Early days but so far love it!
I have the polar 226570 on the wrist for almost a month now I love the watch. This watch and especially the dial looks so much better in the flesh then on videos or pictures. It wears really comfortable too. It has a toolwatch vibe but also looks luxurious. Great watch!
16570 black dial for me. It's my grail watch and will round out my 4 watch collection along with my 5 digit DJ36, Seiko SBP143 and G-Shock DW5600BB. Great video!
Finally pulled the trigger and got the 226570, and it really is cracking hot watch. Thank you for the in depth review it really helped me choose the right reference.
Finally got my Mk-IV Polar 16570 with the 3186. I went over budget a bit but I been kicking my self for a long time when these were like 4-5K usd so I have to do it this time no regret so far
This was a much needed video for me, as I'm currently building up to buying an explorer. I think perfection for me would be the older 40mm dimensions, as well as the previous GMT hand in red, but with all the modern upgrades especially to the movement and bracelet/clasp. However your rundown on the newest version, especially regarding the "fit", has got me back interested. Will go and try the 226570 on next week. If I do end up with one, I'm absolutely fitting it on an aftermarket rubber bracelet. I stumbled upon the company "Rubber B" - do you have any experience with their products? And a bonus question, what tools/toolset would you recommend having for switching bracelet/strap?
RubberB make great products. Stick to the 16570, it’s far more versatile and it will likely become your daily watch. I bought one new back in 2001 and its been my daily ever since, despite trying new watches along the way.
Interestingly, the new black dial 226570 has a gloss dial and the older 216570 has a matte dial, which is opposite of the white dial. I also miss the old floating hands for the older black dial model. For me, the older 216570 is the closest to the original 1655 model.
My first & only Rolex so far is a black 226570. I love it. Watching this vid makes me want a polar too! I do find that I have to wind it more than I was expecting. I wear it daily but I have a desk job. Maybe that’s why. Maybe you can only expect to get 70hrs if it’s fully wound? I also am paranoid about screwing the crown back down. I usually back threads out until I find where they engage before tightening. Can’t really do that since there’s outward tension on the crown. So, other than my obsessive tendencies & incredibly-high expectations for everything, I love my EXP2!
I have a polar 216570 and dig this piece. biggest design difference is in the black dial. The 22 no longer has the gmt ghost hands which is a huge nod to the 1655. The discontinuation also happened the year of the pandemic, which i think is kinda cool history in the making. I feel like people are so focused on the polar that they sleep on this detail that is in my opinion going to be collectible down the road.
Yeah I'm probably in the minority here, I actually like the 216570 better than the 226570 for both the black and polar variants. For the black dial, I love the fact that the "ghost" hands that is a throwback to the old 1655, I reckon serious Rolex enthusiasts love this touch. For the polar, I actually prefer the glossy black hands that work so well with the porcelain white dial. But yeah can't go wrong with either the 21 or the 22.
I hate it when Rolex Keeps making bigger and bigger watches, I wish the explorer II goes back to 40mm or even come up with a 38 39mm whatever it is. After trying all the rolexes the only one that really hit me wast the Explorer 36mm in their current lineup.
I own a Rolex GMT II, coke dial from 2005-D series. I loce my watch. I do like the white dial in the explorer, one has to wonder why watch manufacturers do not have white dials, they seems far and few. Any suggestion besides the Grand Seiko, as to what ither watches can go toe to toe with the explorer with similar design and capabilities? Love to hear suggestions. Awesome video.
I love my 16570 Polar.. I have gotten it serviced by RSC and it's as good as new 😉 it oozes character and it's a keeper for sure. Appreciate the Vlog on the polar. Great content 👌
Love your channel! Super informative without being to technical. My explorer2 was purchased in 1990. I have seen the 42mm versions but still love my “original version” my question is, can l send my watch in to Rolex and get the hands updated to the red color? I think that bit of customization would be really neat an make my 40mm watch stand out in a crowd. So, can it be done and more importantly would Rolex consent to making the change for me? Love to know the answer. Thanks again. Take care.
Great video Adrian , like you I'm a massive explorer fan ,both the original explorer and the explorer 2 , I own a 214270 and I'm looking for an explorer 2 to keep it company in the watch box , I love the maxi case version ,the new version I don't like the noisy whind and the general lack of size on the wrist soim in the hunt ,best wishes from new Zealand
Anything "Explorer".......I'm there. IMHO, the "Explorer," Gen 1, is the most versatile, and well-rounded offering ever produced. Absolute beauty in its' simplicity, and worthy of serious consideration for the "one watch collection." An unquestionably timeless design. The "Explorer II" I also believe, to be one of the greatest sports models ever produced. Though slightly less versatile, one could still argue it's one of the greatest sport models ever produced. Excellent content as usual, old boy. Best wishes to you and yours. Cheers...
Collected my brand new Explorer 2 White Dial 226570 yesterday (27th Nov 24), waited 3 years for it, I absolutely love it. Stunning watch, great video Adrian, thanks for showing me the difference between the models.
Was the 3yr wait due to availability for a new piece from an AD? I'm currently a few months out from making my purchase, curious of the wait time for a White Dial 226570.
My local dealer finally called me to say he has a new Explorer 2 Polar. I will be there when they open. I’ve wanted this watch for 5 years. Great video . Now I no the difference in the new version. Thanks for making my decision feel like a layup.
I just picked up the current explorer II with the black dial and it is such a sharp watch it’s crazy. I definitely think it’s the best Rolex period its cheaper than a sub or a gmt and can do everything they do
Great video and content. It is a shame you "only" reviewed the white/polar dial. The "original" black one is the same watch but in the end a very different one. Especially when you compare the 216570 and the 226570, the changes to the dial and the hands completely upgraded the watch in my opinion.
Thank you for this. Informative with beautiful video. I had to stop and go get my 40mm 16570 and rewatch the cues. Mine has the newer movement and super luminova. Thanks for that.
Thank you for another brilliant video Adrian 👍 Personally, despite the technical improvements since, the 16570 is my favourite...but then again the 4 & 5 digit subs are my favourite too.
Having tried the 16570 and 216570, I've made my decision. I love the orange GMT hand and the orange text, but however much I tried to love the 216570, it's too big for me. My wrist can easily handle a 43mm watch, but the proportions of the 40mm look so much better. It's gonna be a 3186 Polar 16570 for me.
Should have also mentioned the Tudor BB Pro! Maybe do a comparison video of the BB pro against thr 1655, 16750, and 226570? The polar 226570 was my grail for a long time, but couldn't afford (nor get a wifey green light) for a $9500 watch, especially after getting the blue Omega SMP 300M and racing green/leather strap IWC Pilot's Chronograph 41 all in the same year. At some point the green light was given for the BB pro and I got it and love it as the 1655 homage no-nonsense gmt explorer tool watch that it is. Also fits lime a dream at 39mm when my omega is also a 42 just like the exp2, and I don't find it too thick at all since my IWC is also thiccc boi at 14.5mm. Would love to see more BB pro vs. Exp2 content!
Same here, 6 5/8. Maybe 6 3/4 in the summer. I just tried out a 42mm but I could only wear it about 4 hours before it became uncomfortable. My 40mm though, I regularly wear it for 8+ hours without a problem.
Picked up a MAMACOO's watch as my first watch last month and I’m absolutely in love with it. Perfect size, looks elegant, very comfortable. Now my only problem is holding off from buying more watches so quickly!
226570. I love the orange hand and the boldness of the 42mm design. And while the difference from the 116570 are subtle, it's an improvement in every element.
I've recently bought a pre owned 41mm 2021 datejust smooth bezel, white dial with jubilee bracelet and Roman numerals, fab watch. have just ordered an explorer 2 white dial 42mm 216570. not sure of year? paid cheaper price as no papers but is officially rolex certified.
I really enjoyed this video. It does a great job of laying out the evolution of the Explorer 2. I'm 2 months into pestering my local AD for one. Question: What is all the chatter about 32xx movements having accuracy problems? I've read about fixes being applied by Rolex during warranty repair, only to have the issue recur. Perhaps it's only those shut-in horologists, sitting in the lotus position with their timegrapher, for days on end? Have you heard anything about this??
Brilliant vid - but one thing needs mentioning..Your graph needs amending and you’ve missed a sleeper 16570. 2000-2002 you can get a super luminova dial WITH a holes case AND solid end links. For me, personally, this is the 16570 sweet spot. All the modern upgrades with the classic looks.
love your channel and your presentation style.. but please drop the background music playing under the video. it's a distraction and seems at odds with the video itself..
When the Rolex Explorer 1655 was first marketed, the second hand was straight and unremarkable, but the extra hour hand was a bright orange, giving this particular version of the watch its name. In 1974, Rolex added a luminous circle to further aid in seeing the time in the dark and, after 1975, the extra hour hand was painted a bright red, although collectors still refer to this version as the “orange hand” Explorer. The watch was produced until 1985 when it was discontinued from the Rolex lineup.
I love the older (vintage) version of the Explorer II. Just a perfect and refined watch. The new one looks great also, but 42mm makes them a big watch.
Good shoutout to the SBGN003/005. I wear my 005 all the time (including right now) and it's such a fantastic piece. Lovely finishing, especially on the markers and case.
Great video mi amigo - I have to say my favorite version of the Explorer II is….the one I’m getting tomorrow!! Finally got the call from my AD!! I’ll be sporting my new Rolex 226570!! 🎉
Hi Adrian, great video! Quick question, does the latest model use white gold on the hour markers and hands? I know they are coated, but not sure if it’s white gold underneath. Thanks!!
Great video as always. I have the last version of the 16570 (3186 and rehaut) and the 124270. Versatiles and discreets. A perfect two watch collection.
2:10 FYI...you say "216570" here in text but on the video you say "16570" and then after this watch you go into the actual 216570 with the 3187 movement. Edit: You're also showing a 216570 in the video while you're talking about caliber 3186, which was in the 16570.
I purchased the Pagani version of the Explorer II, w/ Polar dial sort of as a broad stroke test drive for day to day use. I loved it. It's like the color inversion of my Rolex Submariner w/ date (ref# 116610LN) and I love it! Definitely my next Rolex purchase....maybe this February.
Check out the Rolex Explorer II over at Chronext:
www.chronext.com/rolex/explorer-ii?
@Adrian it would had been nice of you to display the transition model 16550 which in my humble opinion it most sought after cream -rail dial with big font numbers
I know you don’t set Chronext’s pricing, Adrian, but just in case some poor hapless viewer is tempted to give them £17,000 for a 226570, I feel obliged to mention that they could save seven grand and head over to Chrono24. Much as I love mine, £17k is a criminal price for one of these. As well you know.
Chronext are way too expensive. Wouldn’t use them
… favorite ? of course the 16570 🤷♂️
Which Explorer model is on your wrist there? - Thanks
Can you do a submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner vs submariner video ?
Done - ua-cam.com/video/Lyj9Rj-yH0Y/v-deo.html
Outstanding service 😂
@@BarkandJack Have you done the 114060 vs 124060?😊
😂
@@BabyKermit_this id like to see !
216570 was my grail, and after scraping and saving for years, and resisting the urge to scratch the itch with homages and cheaper options, it is now my daily. And I’m still so so so in love!
I have a question. That's 42mm right? Seeing that you wear it everyday I suppose the weight doesn't bother you. Are you able to comfortably wear it 6+ hours daily?
I only ask because I recently went from a 40mm to a 42mm and I found the change of size and weight to be unfavorable for me. I like 42mm but I'm just wondering if in this specific case it might just be the watch and strap combination I have on it. I'm hoping I'd be able to find a comfortable 42mm. So far my 40mm is the only watch I can tolerate for 8+ hours. Thanks, Chris.
I’ve had my 226570 for over a year. I’ve come close to selling it twice because I found it heavy on the bracelet (although it’s fabulous on a NATO / MN / RubberB). Then I got a Black Bay Pro and realised just how well balanced and perfectly proportioned the Explorer II is and I haven’t looked back. Wearing it right now and loving it. I’d recommend trying and buying (although definitely not for the absurd £17k they’re asking for on Chronext).
MN?
@@CaptainYellow2085 great question. I have a 7 inch wrist, so size-wise it is close to perfect, if a hair on the large size. 40mm is the sweet spot I think. But the indices and hands are larger too, which fills the negative space so much better than a lot of 42s, and is what I think I love most about it. It’s not a thick watch, def never use the word chunky to describe it as I would with 42mm tudors. Weight wise, it’s not an issue. It’s such a well balanced well proportioned piece, I have no problem wearing it on bracelet. So to sum it up and answer your question, it is a very comfortable daily wearer.
@@SolidCaseBackThank you for your response. It's interesting that sometimes it takes another watch to put things into perspective. That's happened to me a couple of times. It's a fun journey finding what fits!
Yes, I'm looking into my first Rolex soon but I'm not sure I want to pay the premium for it. Of course with a Rolex, money shouldn't really be much of a deciding factor but the principal that these are selling 5k-to10k over dealer price is absurd.
If the current gen was sized back down to 40mm it would be a no brainer
i wish
That would then compete and overthrow gmt master 2
The 16570 has the most pleasing proportions to my eyes, especially with dial elements and hands. There are other improvements in the 3186 besides elimination of hand wobble. It has faster crown to quickset hour hand gearing, a lot less tedious when setting the date if you're off by weeks when setting the watch. It has a parachrom bleu hairspring as well. Basically it's the same movement that's in the ceramic gmt master IIs from 2005 to 2018
Apparently some of those changes contributed to it being less reliable and harder to service than the 3185. Or at least that's what I heard from a watchmaker
@@jordonfan1283 It's possible I suppose, but I don't think the ceramic gmts seemed to suffer any issues. Haha the watchmakers i know tend to bitch about everything but I love them!
@@jordonfan1283 Yes, there's a write-up from a watchmaker on the internet explaining why the 3185 is more stable and easier to service.
@@johnnyguitar6697 what was the last year of the Explorer II with the 3185 movement?
@@oaktree1628 2005, if my memory is correct
Great video! In 2012 I bought a 2009 16570 off eBay for $2k, had it serviced, and it’s been running COSC ever since. The dimensions of the 40mm (it’s actually closer to 39mm) are perfect for my 6.75-in wrist. When Rolex came out with the 216570 I thought it was hideous. They really need to come out with a scaled back “retro” version like they did with the Explorer 1.
just paid $6k for a 2009 16570! Crazy that your asset appreciated 4k in that amount of time.
@@the_average_hobo and thats even a relativly low price I would say.
@@domoel 6k?
I have the ref 16570 black dial circa 2009. The case is beautifully refined and the size is near perfect for every day wear. Having the 3186 also gives it GMT functionality which is a bonus. The ideal travel watch as it’s not showy at all.
I purchased my Rolex explorer ll in 1993...... I elected to go with the black face...... more masculine!!!!
I purchased it for two reasons.....
The explorer ll was developed to celebrate Sir Edmund Hillary’s assent of Mt. Everest in 1953!!!!! Hilary was a kiwi!!!! I too am a kiwi.... hence the desire to own a watch that had a massive kiwi connection!!!!
But also I’m a 007 James Bond fan!!! Been to Goldeneye in Jamaica... touched the writing desk etc etc....
Ian Fleming was a fan of Rolex.....
And he wore the original Explorer Rolex watch!!!! Hence by buying an explorer ll I was paying homage to two brilliant individuals!!!
I wear the watch 24/7 and that is the only piece of jewellery that I wear!!!!
A total piece of vintage art work!!!!
Regards Ian 👨🎤🇳🇿🏉 9:42
What about the 32xx low amplitude problem? Probably safer to go with the 31xx movement in the previous gen.
I tried on the current version of Rolex Explorer 2 the 42mm one. To me the orange hand felt a bit cartoony. Also felt too big for an everyday watch on my 6.5in wrists. Huge fan of the 16570 40mm version as it’s the perfect size. Of course I’d prefer the updated movement and stuff but a fusion of old and new would be ideal for me :)
I'm the same way. Wore a 40mm for the past 8 months but decided to try on a 42mm. The small change in size and weight just didn't work for me. I can only wear it for about 4 hours till it starts to bother me. My wrist fluctuates between 6 5/8 - 6 3/4.
For me at least, 40mm seems to strike the perfect balance of size, weight, and wearability. I do have a Tag Heuer that I really love that's a 38mm. I also have a vintage Omega Seamaster that's a 36mm. Looks kinda tiny but it's super comfortable.
I convinced myself that I needed to get the 124270 over the 114270 because of the technical advances with the movement, better bracelet, lume, etc. It did nothing for me. Switched to a 114270 where for me the dial proportions are perfect and the other stuff doesn’t matter. Actually. The older watch keeps better time than the newer one 😀
Just got a call from Bucherer - the Explorer ii that I ordered - I've forgotten how long ago - has arrived. Colour me excited! Love this watch. Great vid Adrian.
5 months later, and what do you think? Which did you get, Polar or Black dial?
Woooah! I love the edit Adrian!!! Edit. Sound effects. Watch. All on point.
Did you hire an editer yet?!?! Or is this all Adrian barker goodness? I am living! 😊
@@BrittPearceWatches Yeah, my editor did this video. Really happy with it.
@@davidr2802 I think it's time you have a break from social media David, you're saying stupid stuff.
Collected my 226570 (Black) last weekend and I'm in love! They fixed everything I disliked about the 216570. I have had a couple of 16570's previously and sold them both, the 16570 is an incredible watch; with a lot of charm, but the latest model is just better in every way and I can certainly see it being a watch that remains in my collection.
Is the ball bearing noise noticeable/bothersome. Or do you not really notice much?
@@joshs3916 it is noticeable, and 22mm between lugs is there for all to see.
@@joshs3916 I’ve not noticed it unless I hold it up to my ear and spin it… so no.
Slender wrist here. 16570 is by FAR the most comfy watch I own. Love the size, never going to give it up ❤
The new Exp 2 is 🔥 The polar dial is great. The noise regarding the ball bearings isn’t bothersome
I’ve had all but the used 1655 I regrettably passed on in the late 90s.
Love my 216570/226570 models. The Explorer 2 is my favorite watch.
Born in 1971. Just like me.
The last great tool watch.
My 16570 polar dial is one of my favorite watches. Flys under the radar so well. The new model in black is stunning but the 42mm case is so clunky. If they did the 226570 in 40mm I would have bought one on day 1.
I’m wearing my 16570 right now and pretty sure my love for it (& purchase) was influenced by your early videos Adrian!
My only criticism of the newest model is that they didn’t add a quickset date (same goes for the GMT Master). When I pick this out of the box and it’s 15 days wrong, it’s really a pain in the arse to set!
Oh man, do you have to go through the full 24 hours to change it? That's kinda miserable 😅
I'd be tempted to leave the date wrong lmao.
Are you serious? ... it takes seconds !! just pull out the crown to position 1 and spin the hour hand round and the date soon moves on .. almost as fast as a quick set.
most GMT watches don't have quickset date and I actually prefer it that way
@@CaptainYellow2085 FIRST world problems..... I love mine.
226570 - I got it just a few weeks ago, and I am almost surprised to realize that it is just superb. The suttle changes has made it into a monster, in a good way.
I’ve had the pleasure of trying on the 16570 and although the GMT hand is shaky it’s such a great looking watch. I personally like the proportions on it more and I have a 7 1/2 inch wrist so I can fit a 42mm comfortably. Great video as always sir. Thank you!
07:15 Well I actually really like the scratchy sound when the rotor swings. The Seamaster 300M does this as well. In my opinion it adds to the feeling of owning a mechanical watch.
Agreed
No way
I never planned to buy a Rolex, Omega in my eyes was the watch brand that I could love and afford. Now having multiple Speedmasters, a Black Bay & Santos on a whim I picked up a 16570 ver. 3. I can say it has become my absolute favorite watch. I took it off the bracelet and ordered an Everest strap but put it on a NATO while the strap was coming and it was a game changer. I've had the Everest strap sitting on my desk for months now, I just can't take it off the NATO. From someone who didn't love Rolex for many years, I am here to say the 16570 is a perfect watch.
I bought my 216570 WD years ago for way under retail. Nobody wanted this watch. Even today it is pretty much underrated compared to GMTs. The ExII is the best watch from Rolex with a white dial in my opinion. Even better than the Daytona. Perfect readability (do you say so in England?), Date, GMT function,…what else do you need? The new model has a bigger bracelet and clasp. Some may like that, but I don’t.
I still prefer the old 40mm version.
My 1997 white dial Explorer II was stolen a few years ago and , as I looked for a replacement, I decided to buy the black dial version.
I find it more versatile to wear than the white dial ever was.
Just got mine. 226570, love this Watch! And this video is the best I’ve seen about the Explorer II and comparison between models. Thanks and congrats for the great videos!
I just picked up a 226570, I love it. I own a Sub but always wanted an Explorer II
I have a small wrist and love the explorer line, unfortunately the 42mm models are just too big for me…..so I’ve had to settle on a 1976 1655 instead. Love it, I think it’s the most unique vintage Rolex out there.
This is a great comparison, I finally took the plunge and recently bought the 216570 variation. Early days but so far love it!
I have the polar 226570 on the wrist for almost a month now I love the watch. This watch and especially the dial looks so much better in the flesh then on videos or pictures. It wears really comfortable too. It has a toolwatch vibe but also looks luxurious. Great watch!
16570 black dial for me. It's my grail watch and will round out my 4 watch collection along with my 5 digit DJ36, Seiko SBP143 and G-Shock DW5600BB. Great video!
Finally pulled the trigger and got the 226570, and it really is cracking hot watch. Thank you for the in depth review it really helped me choose the right reference.
Finally got my Mk-IV Polar 16570 with the 3186. I went over budget a bit but I been kicking my self for a long time when these were like 4-5K usd so I have to do it this time no regret so far
I was extremely fortunate to pick up a 226570 from an AD three weeks ago. It's the perfect companion to the Batman!
Adrian, love the vids. Humble suggestion: leave the tech specs on screen a little longer.
When you said about the old Explorer II 9:04, it made me changed my mind totally... Now i'm in love with the 16570 ... thank you
This was a much needed video for me, as I'm currently building up to buying an explorer. I think perfection for me would be the older 40mm dimensions, as well as the previous GMT hand in red, but with all the modern upgrades especially to the movement and bracelet/clasp. However your rundown on the newest version, especially regarding the "fit", has got me back interested. Will go and try the 226570 on next week.
If I do end up with one, I'm absolutely fitting it on an aftermarket rubber bracelet. I stumbled upon the company "Rubber B" - do you have any experience with their products? And a bonus question, what tools/toolset would you recommend having for switching bracelet/strap?
RubberB make great products. Stick to the 16570, it’s far more versatile and it will likely become your daily watch. I bought one new back in 2001 and its been my daily ever since, despite trying new watches along the way.
Love videos like this Adrian. You should turn this into a series and feature watches from different brands and do this history of them!
would love to see one for the Pepsi. Especially with the color problems they had with it in the past.
Interestingly, the new black dial 226570 has a gloss dial and the older 216570 has a matte dial, which is opposite of the white dial. I also miss the old floating hands for the older black dial model. For me, the older 216570 is the closest to the original 1655 model.
226570 has a matte dial, not a glossy one
@@MacOrph no, it has a glossy one. The black dial I am referring to.
My first & only Rolex so far is a black 226570. I love it. Watching this vid makes me want a polar too! I do find that I have to wind it more than I was expecting. I wear it daily but I have a desk job. Maybe that’s why. Maybe you can only expect to get 70hrs if it’s fully wound?
I also am paranoid about screwing the crown back down. I usually back threads out until I find where they engage before tightening. Can’t really do that since there’s outward tension on the crown.
So, other than my obsessive tendencies & incredibly-high expectations for everything, I love my EXP2!
Had both 16570 and 216570. Sold the latter after two months, it was better in every way on paper but I enjoy the 16570 much more. Great review 👍
I have a polar 216570 and dig this piece. biggest design difference is in the black dial. The 22 no longer has the gmt ghost hands which is a huge nod to the 1655. The discontinuation also happened the year of the pandemic, which i think is kinda cool history in the making. I feel like people are so focused on the polar that they sleep on this detail that is in my opinion going to be collectible down the road.
Definitely agree with this - this is alias my opinion on the black dial. Absolute sleeper.
Yeah I'm probably in the minority here, I actually like the 216570 better than the 226570 for both the black and polar variants. For the black dial, I love the fact that the "ghost" hands that is a throwback to the old 1655, I reckon serious Rolex enthusiasts love this touch. For the polar, I actually prefer the glossy black hands that work so well with the porcelain white dial. But yeah can't go wrong with either the 21 or the 22.
My 16570 is still my favourite out of all my watches - a proper classic now, as it was when I bought it. Great vids - Cheers A
I hate it when Rolex Keeps making bigger and bigger watches, I wish the explorer II goes back to 40mm or even come up with a 38 39mm whatever it is. After trying all the rolexes the only one that really hit me wast the Explorer 36mm in their current lineup.
I think the sweet spot is a 16570 with the 3186 movement. Great video!
I own a Rolex GMT II, coke dial from 2005-D series. I loce my watch. I do like the white dial in the explorer, one has to wonder why watch manufacturers do not have white dials, they seems far and few. Any suggestion besides the Grand Seiko, as to what ither watches can go toe to toe with the explorer with similar design and capabilities? Love to hear suggestions. Awesome video.
Been looking forward to this video since you said you were doing it. My grail is still the Explorer 1 but I love the whole range
I love my 16570 Polar.. I have gotten it serviced by RSC and it's as good as new 😉 it oozes character and it's a keeper for sure. Appreciate the Vlog on the polar. Great content 👌
Love your channel! Super informative without being to technical. My explorer2 was purchased in 1990. I have seen the 42mm versions but still love my “original version” my question is, can l send my watch in to Rolex and get the hands updated to the red color? I think that bit of customization would be really neat an make my 40mm watch stand out in a crowd. So, can it be done and more importantly would Rolex consent to making the change for me? Love to know the answer. Thanks again. Take care.
Amazing video Adrian! Your videos got me obsessed with the explorer II and just bought a 16570!
I’m in the minority but the black one wins it for me. Enjoyed the video Adrian 👍
Great video Adrian , like you I'm a massive explorer fan ,both the original explorer and the explorer 2 , I own a 214270 and I'm looking for an explorer 2 to keep it company in the watch box , I love the maxi case version ,the new version I don't like the noisy whind and the general lack of size on the wrist soim in the hunt ,best wishes from new Zealand
Anything "Explorer".......I'm there. IMHO, the "Explorer," Gen 1, is the most versatile, and well-rounded offering ever produced. Absolute beauty in its' simplicity, and worthy of serious consideration for the "one watch collection." An unquestionably timeless design. The "Explorer II" I also believe, to be one of the greatest sports models ever produced. Though slightly less versatile, one could still argue it's one of the greatest sport models ever produced. Excellent content as usual, old boy. Best wishes to you and yours. Cheers...
After watching this video about 50 times, I’m collecting my Explorer II 226570 today, finally got the call
How long did you wait?
@@johnnywells8217 about a year
Collected my brand new Explorer 2 White Dial 226570 yesterday (27th Nov 24), waited 3 years for it, I absolutely love it. Stunning watch, great video Adrian, thanks for showing me the difference between the models.
Was the 3yr wait due to availability for a new piece from an AD? I'm currently a few months out from making my purchase, curious of the wait time for a White Dial 226570.
@@rickeyvarga5432 yes, waited since 2021
Hmmm… I’d go with the Explorer 2. Thank you for the clarification Adrian 🍻
My local dealer finally called me to say he has a new Explorer 2 Polar. I will be there when they open. I’ve wanted this watch for 5 years. Great video . Now I no the difference in the new version. Thanks for making my decision feel like a layup.
The explorer range was never on my raider until I came across this channel 🙏🏻 Now I want an Explorer I and II 👌🏻
👍
I just picked up the current explorer II with the black dial and it is such a sharp watch it’s crazy. I definitely think it’s the best Rolex period its cheaper than a sub or a gmt and can do everything they do
Great video and content. It is a shame you "only" reviewed the white/polar dial. The "original" black one is the same watch but in the end a very different one. Especially when you compare the 216570 and the 226570, the changes to the dial and the hands completely upgraded the watch in my opinion.
My favourite is the 16570. Just a stunning looking watch.
Grey jumper and Explorer II…couldn’t be a more Adrian video. Love it 😅
Thank you for this. Informative with beautiful video. I had to stop and go get my 40mm 16570 and rewatch the cues. Mine has the newer movement and super luminova. Thanks for that.
Thank you for another brilliant video Adrian 👍
Personally, despite the technical improvements since, the 16570 is my favourite...but then again the 4 & 5 digit subs are my favourite too.
Having tried the 16570 and 216570, I've made my decision. I love the orange GMT hand and the orange text, but however much I tried to love the 216570, it's too big for me. My wrist can easily handle a 43mm watch, but the proportions of the 40mm look so much better.
It's gonna be a 3186 Polar 16570 for me.
I just bought the 216570 version of the Explorer II. Beautiful watch
my absolute Favourite watch, funny you would make a Video just now
Should have also mentioned the Tudor BB Pro! Maybe do a comparison video of the BB pro against thr 1655, 16750, and 226570? The polar 226570 was my grail for a long time, but couldn't afford (nor get a wifey green light) for a $9500 watch, especially after getting the blue Omega SMP 300M and racing green/leather strap IWC Pilot's Chronograph 41 all in the same year. At some point the green light was given for the BB pro and I got it and love it as the 1655 homage no-nonsense gmt explorer tool watch that it is. Also fits lime a dream at 39mm when my omega is also a 42 just like the exp2, and I don't find it too thick at all since my IWC is also thiccc boi at 14.5mm. Would love to see more BB pro vs. Exp2 content!
This thumbnail was legendary. Great content as always friend. I enjoy watching you watch watches while I watch my own watch.
I have the 16570 which fits my 6 5/8” wrist much better than the larger versions. As far as looks, I think the latest matte version is striking!
Same here, 6 5/8. Maybe 6 3/4 in the summer. I just tried out a 42mm but I could only wear it about 4 hours before it became uncomfortable. My 40mm though, I regularly wear it for 8+ hours without a problem.
Picked up a MAMACOO's watch as my first watch last month and I’m absolutely in love with it. Perfect size, looks elegant, very comfortable. Now my only problem is holding off from buying more watches so quickly!
226570. I love the orange hand and the boldness of the 42mm design. And while the difference from the 116570 are subtle, it's an improvement in every element.
I've recently bought a pre owned 41mm 2021 datejust smooth bezel, white dial with jubilee bracelet and Roman numerals, fab watch.
have just ordered an explorer 2 white dial 42mm 216570. not sure of year? paid cheaper price as no papers but is officially rolex certified.
I really enjoyed this video. It does a great job of laying out the evolution of the Explorer 2. I'm 2 months into pestering my local AD for one. Question: What is all the chatter about 32xx movements having accuracy problems? I've read about fixes being applied by Rolex during warranty repair, only to have the issue recur. Perhaps it's only those shut-in horologists, sitting in the lotus position with their timegrapher, for days on end? Have you heard anything about this??
Brilliant vid - but one thing needs mentioning..Your graph needs amending and you’ve missed a sleeper 16570. 2000-2002 you can get a super luminova dial WITH a holes case AND solid end links. For me, personally, this is the 16570 sweet spot. All the modern upgrades with the classic looks.
I love my explorer ii, 40mm z serial from 2008 with black dial, 3186 movement and engraved rehaut. 👏 amazing, do everything watch.
love the 226570 orange pops on that dial
I understand this is an Iconic watch, but to me, will always trial the Explorer.
Nothing beats the Explorer.
love your channel and your presentation style.. but please drop the background music playing under the video. it's a distraction and seems at odds with the video itself..
Wish you also brought in the Black Bay Pro too for the vid
When the Rolex Explorer 1655 was first marketed, the second hand was straight and unremarkable, but the extra hour hand was a bright orange, giving this particular version of the watch its name. In 1974, Rolex added a luminous circle to further aid in seeing the time in the dark and, after 1975, the extra hour hand was painted a bright red, although collectors still refer to this version as the “orange hand” Explorer. The watch was produced until 1985 when it was discontinued from the Rolex lineup.
The 1655 was produced until 1984, after which it was replaced by the 16550. I have seen 16550's with serial numbers dating it back to 1984.
I love the older (vintage) version of the Explorer II. Just a perfect and refined watch. The new one looks great also, but 42mm makes them a big watch.
Good shoutout to the SBGN003/005. I wear my 005 all the time (including right now) and it's such a fantastic piece. Lovely finishing, especially on the markers and case.
Have the 226570, so happy with that. Use almost everyday
Great video mi amigo - I have to say my favorite version of the Explorer II is….the one I’m getting tomorrow!! Finally got the call from my AD!! I’ll be sporting my new Rolex 226570!! 🎉
Hi Adrian, great video! Quick question, does the latest model use white gold on the hour markers and hands? I know they are coated, but not sure if it’s white gold underneath. Thanks!!
Thanks for watching Rolando. The hands and hour makers are indeed white gold on the latest model.
Thanks a lot!
love the depth of the video and the animation that comes with it
Thanks so much mate 🙌🏻
Great info and eye-candy. Almost bought the Explorer in the early 2000's. Looking back w regret. 😆 Thanks for sharing
I have a '98 vintage 16570 and love it's proportions.Never missed a beat,serviced once.The latest looks a bit Fisher-Price..
Adrian, the polar explorer was your first Rolex right? Such a great and unapologetic watch. Understated elegance. Especially the five digit models
You're right, the 16570 was my first Rolex. It really is a cool watch.
can you do feature on the rolex explorer 2 polar SWISS only dial. how valuable it is compared to the others .thanks
Great video as always. I have the last version of the 16570 (3186 and rehaut) and the 124270. Versatiles and discreets. A perfect two watch collection.
That 226570 is pretty sweet!! Did you get a new lens for you camera? The image seems way cripser. Thanks for the wonderful content!
Great video. One question, can you provide the info for the nato straps that were shown on the 226570 ref please?
Finally somebody did this! It’s the video nobody asked for but everybody needed.
7:50 you said the the barrel edges are thinner two times
Best size and feel comes from the 40mm Explorer II!! Amazing watch that is very underrated in my opinion
Have you done this for all the Explorer references, specifically that bar graph of lume, endlinks, lug holes and movement? That was really helpful!
2:10 FYI...you say "216570" here in text but on the video you say "16570" and then after this watch you go into the actual 216570 with the 3187 movement.
Edit:
You're also showing a 216570 in the video while you're talking about caliber 3186, which was in the 16570.
I purchased the Pagani version of the Explorer II, w/ Polar dial sort of as a broad stroke test drive for day to day use. I loved it.
It's like the color inversion of my Rolex Submariner w/ date (ref# 116610LN) and I love it! Definitely my next Rolex purchase....maybe this February.
Adrian… that’s a kick-ass review of my next acquisition!! As much as I prefer the 40mm, I’m going for the 226570.
Well done, thank you!!
Thanks a lot for watching Carl. I too prefer the 40mm, but for the money, the 226570 is just a better watch.
For the bracelet, etched rehaut and serial number, the Caliber, the orange GMT hand and lettering, 70 hour power reserve & price - no brainer.