People make too big of deal about someone getting the name or description of the movie wrong. I doubt they do it on purpose. I enjoy the movie for what it is. I really liked this one! Plots and sub-plots, interesting characters, good acting, beautiful music. Sometimes you just have to laugh, e.g. the heroine jumping from boat, to a pier, to climbing about a cargo ship....all in a dress and high heels! Isn't that the point of movies....to entertain & let your imagination run free? THANK YOU for posting!
Your description doesn't match the movie!! I haven't seen one Dr. Let alone 3 described in the entire movie. Get it right or don't post it. It's aggravating to the reader n watcher!!!
In the period after WW2 the studio started faltering between the Red Scare and TV and the old group of actors like Cooper, Gable & Robert Taylor getting older. Many of the stars in the 30’s and 40’s began on the stage or vaudeville (i.e.Gary Grant). Tony Curtis probably was a model or went in the studio system untrained. Like Rock Hudson. With experience they became better actors. Especially Curtis.
Just like a cheap version of "Gilda" :-( .... And Joanne Dru - a decent actress but never on the level of the lovely and unique Rita Hayworth - leaves the doubt why a guy is chasing her around the world because of being in love with her.....????
I think that’s a bit overstated. Granted it’s not Bogey or Bette Davis. Curtis became more accomplished with experience. Dru was a pretty face never had acting chops. By 53 Hollywood was in serious decline between TV and the House Unamerican activities. Quality went down as the Studio System collapsed. The Hayes code was stymied creativity from 35 forward. As Stephen Ambrose said” the fifties were boring because that’s exactly what Ike wanted”.
I think the pace of it very much affected how the acting seemed....a bit slower might have been better. I think the girl acted well for the part, and also that Tony Curtis got better with more experience.
Interesting plot, good acting, excellent cinematizing. A nice Saturday afternoon movie!
This is a great movie. Thanks!
Very exciting movie.
The guy following him played the secretary on the TV series millionaire !!!
Tony Curtis was a good actor.
And g good looking in his younger days.
I would say he was a fair actor but definitely very handsome.
*Bernard Schwartz
Tony Curtis had bedroom eyes that's what they used to call Them 🥰
People make too big of deal about someone getting the name or description of the movie wrong. I doubt they do it on purpose. I enjoy the movie for what it is. I really liked this one! Plots and sub-plots, interesting characters, good acting, beautiful music. Sometimes you just have to laugh, e.g. the heroine jumping from boat, to a pier, to climbing about a cargo ship....all in a dress and high heels! Isn't that the point of movies....to entertain & let your imagination run free? THANK YOU for posting!
Great decors and her wardrobe is fabulous.
Good intriguing movie, WRONG DESCRIPTION!
The ubiquitous cigarette hanging out of all actors mouths. During this era due to tobacco companies spreading the word of sponsorship!
And they drank more than they smoked!
Description of movie is TOTALLY INCORRECT
Love the gown she's wearing.
Very enjoyable Joanne Drew and Tony Curtis good together .
Ran along the storey libe of movie MACAU with Robert Mitchum. & Jane Russell great movie.
Kind of a riff off of Gilda, transposed to Macao.
You Belong to Me. Great song.
Beautiful gowns that Rita Hayworth look.
Your description doesn't match the movie!! I haven't seen one Dr. Let alone 3 described in the entire movie. Get it right or don't post it. It's aggravating to the reader n watcher!!!
thank you, liz. does anyone know what the described film is?
Tis human to error, and divine to forgive.
Builds character
Yea very much like Gilda story line indeed.
Marvin miller the millionaire
Great screen play 😂😂😂
360 is not HD
In the period after WW2 the studio started faltering between the Red Scare and TV and the old group of actors like Cooper, Gable & Robert Taylor getting older. Many of the stars in the 30’s and 40’s began on the stage or vaudeville (i.e.Gary Grant). Tony Curtis probably was a model or went in the studio system untrained. Like Rock Hudson. With experience they became better actors. Especially Curtis.
Traduzcsnla a español
2nd ad 30.25
5th ad 51.40
Not bad to look at. Tony was born Bernie Schwartz ❤
And Schwartz s life was over after he married Janet Leigh
@@jimcrawford3185 How so?
@@ThePianoMan1953
She was a horrid wombat and made the poor soul s life a living hell
Just like a cheap version of "Gilda" :-( .... And Joanne Dru - a decent actress but never on the level of the lovely and unique Rita Hayworth - leaves the doubt why a guy is chasing her around the world because of being in love with her.....????
I think she was extremely beautiful, and she and Tony Curtis sure seemed to be hopelessly in love with each other.
1st ad 8.56
4th ad 45.40
3rd ad 36.33
no ads I use Adblock Plus for UA-cam PC and Android
6th ad 119.14
Horrible acting
I think that’s a bit overstated. Granted it’s not Bogey or Bette Davis. Curtis became more accomplished with experience. Dru was a pretty face never had acting chops. By 53 Hollywood was in serious decline between TV and the House Unamerican activities. Quality went down as the Studio System collapsed. The Hayes code was stymied creativity from 35 forward. As Stephen Ambrose said” the fifties were boring because that’s exactly what Ike wanted”.
I think the pace of it very much affected how the acting seemed....a bit slower might have been better. I think the girl acted well for the part, and also that Tony Curtis got better with more experience.