6:49 A. I. cannot be 'regulated'; since the developers are always very far ahead. By the time a 'regulator' would be questioning a concept; it's already there! 6:55 Well really; you need to find the 'smartest human on the earth' and see if that potential is valid. 7:01 Well yes; but is that not problematic since it's military? 7:05 The powers that be behind the project WILL. By all means if allowed to. And you have zilch guarantee that these powers that be are on the right side of the Good/Evil scale and even if they were on the 'right' side; zilch guarantee that the scales can't tip at any point! And with a. i.; when the scales tip; they'll tip fast with a bang! 😳
7:57 WHO'S PLAN? AND WHAT'S THE PLAN? 😳 7:59 THAT'S THE PLAN? THE BLACK MAN GETS A BRILLIANT WHITE CHAUFFEUR?! Somethin' tells me that's not the plan. 😳 Or he's employed by the robot? Oh ok. He works for the robot. I get it. Does he get paid? 😳
0:09 Me too! Very! Many say that the world needs a 'benevolent' dictator. Perhaps a. i. could do this for 'a time'. But ultimately, it cannot be benevolent.
7:38 Technological advancement is not a 'benefit'. It's just technological advancement. For example; A) I can stick my clothes in the washing machine and get a load done in 1 hour 36 minutes. Or B) I can sit on my African stool outdoors with my legs on either side of the huge plastic bowl and spend 3 days hand washing 3 weeks of dirty laundry for a family, including sheets and towels. I've done both. A) Saves all time and all labour and gives me time to spend hours on a computer for examples. B) The benefits to my physical health are too numerous to list. - So is the technological advancement of the washing machine a 'benefit' or a curse? 😳
5:50 So; you ask the question is A. I. evil; and then you state: "It's holding a lot of promise for the future right now which makes it a 'good' thing." A lot of promise for who's future? Mine or yours? Because I am not you. And my 'desirable' future might be very entirely different to yours! You can't really ask the question as to whether a thing is 'evil' and then decide that it's 'good' because it serves your personal view of what the future should hold. You've skipped about 50 steps here! 😳
7:40 I would be delighted if the a. i. would consider 'developing an approach' to solve my problems! But then I don't feel that my own approach is inadequate. 7:43 Nothing can 'make life easy' for you! Since this 'ease' is largely internal and completely different for everyone according to their disposition!
5:39 I don't know what that means "people love grouping 'everything' into extremes". We do not group 'everything' into extremes. We have Good and Evil and Neutral; with a spectrum on either side of Neutral moving towards Good and Evil. 5:42 It depends what you mean by A. I. here. Robots to punch holes in a car factory is not Deep Mind. An a. i. to flag all the swear words online for example, is not an autonomous drone swarm programmed to search for and destroy one man. 6:26 Again; humans sit on the Good/Evil spectrum like all things. There is no limit to how good or evil a human can be. The majorly 'good' humans always inhabit a world in which the majorly 'evil' humans are also present; since their level of 'goodness' is developed in response to the level of 'evil' which they perceive. The scales sometimes tip one way or the other. However; when the scale tips to the point that evil is sitting on the ground; then that's it. There's not possibility for good to move downwards again. And vice versa of course! Which means that if 'Good' hits the ground; Evil can never resurge again. It's a choice between eternal hell with no way out or paradise with no demise. Of course; no human is 'fundamentally' evil. It's a conditioned state and an illness. And curable. Which is why I reject the death penalty with all my heart.
5:39 I don't know what that means "people love grouping 'everything' into extremes". We do not group 'everything' into extremes. We have Good and Evil and Neutral; with a spectrum on either side of Neutral moving towards Good and Evil. 5:42 It depends what you mean by A. I. here. Robots to punch holes in a car factory is not Deep Mind. An a. i. to flag all the swear words online for example, is not an autonomous drone swarm programmed to search for and destroy one man. 6:26 Again; humans sit on the Good/Evil spectrum like all things. There is no limit to how good or evil a human can be. The majorly 'good' humans always inhabit a world in which the majorly 'evil' humans are also present; since their level of 'goodness' is developed in response to the level of 'evil' which they perceive. The scales sometimes tip one way or the other. However; when the scale tips to the point that evil is sitting on the ground; then that's it. There's not possibility for good to move downwards again. And vice versa of course! Which means that if 'Good' hits the ground; Evil can never resurge again. It's a choice between eternal hell with no way out or paradise with no demise.
5:33 At this level, yes. Because all decisions are based on the computation of data. It is not sentient and therefore has no emotional intelligence. Human intelligence is not purely 'intellectual'. Emotional intelligence enables humans to make faster decisions WITHOUT conceptual thought; bypassing the 'computational' aspect of the brain. This is a facility which enables a human to move at maximum speed straight from the heart center; which a. i. does not possess. The other reason why a. i. is evil; is because like most 'science' projects; it was developed for corporate profit. It is the bi-product of corporate capitalism. Of course; you can't 'technically' say that a. i. is evil as such; because it's not sentient. However; what is built by Evil is inheritently evil in itself. It's an extension of his being. Although we are told that it will 'cure' this, that and the other diseases; this is not why it was developed. 6:04 Stickin' to my guns on this one. Sorry if I'm a simpleton.
7:49 Well no. I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT realise this! WHICH people on earth is it going to get 'a whole lot easier' for? The ones who were not in the anthill when it got bulldozed? 😳
If AI ever takes over it will rightly conclude that the infestation of humans on the earth is a bad thing and will take intimidate steps to reduce their numbers.
8:16 Ok. Thanks. Nice vid. See you in the next one! (Sending love just in case you're human.) 🙏🖤
6:49 A. I. cannot be 'regulated'; since the developers are always very far ahead. By the time a 'regulator' would be questioning a concept; it's already there! 6:55 Well really; you need to find the 'smartest human on the earth' and see if that potential is valid. 7:01 Well yes; but is that not problematic since it's military? 7:05 The powers that be behind the project WILL. By all means if allowed to. And you have zilch guarantee that these powers that be are on the right side of the Good/Evil scale and even if they were on the 'right' side; zilch guarantee that the scales can't tip at any point! And with a. i.; when the scales tip; they'll tip fast with a bang! 😳
Elon musk is afraid *Of* google
7:57 WHO'S PLAN? AND WHAT'S THE PLAN? 😳 7:59 THAT'S THE PLAN? THE BLACK MAN GETS A BRILLIANT WHITE CHAUFFEUR?! Somethin' tells me that's not the plan. 😳 Or he's employed by the robot? Oh ok. He works for the robot. I get it. Does he get paid? 😳
0:09 Me too! Very! Many say that the world needs a 'benevolent' dictator. Perhaps a. i. could do this for 'a time'. But ultimately, it cannot be benevolent.
7:38 Technological advancement is not a 'benefit'. It's just technological advancement. For example; A) I can stick my clothes in the washing machine and get a load done in 1 hour 36 minutes. Or B) I can sit on my African stool outdoors with my legs on either side of the huge plastic bowl and spend 3 days hand washing 3 weeks of dirty laundry for a family, including sheets and towels. I've done both. A) Saves all time and all labour and gives me time to spend hours on a computer for examples. B) The benefits to my physical health are too numerous to list. - So is the technological advancement of the washing machine a 'benefit' or a curse? 😳
5:50 So; you ask the question is A. I. evil; and then you state: "It's holding a lot of promise for the future right now which makes it a 'good' thing." A lot of promise for who's future? Mine or yours? Because I am not you. And my 'desirable' future might be very entirely different to yours! You can't really ask the question as to whether a thing is 'evil' and then decide that it's 'good' because it serves your personal view of what the future should hold. You've skipped about 50 steps here! 😳
7:40 I would be delighted if the a. i. would consider 'developing an approach' to solve my problems! But then I don't feel that my own approach is inadequate. 7:43 Nothing can 'make life easy' for you! Since this 'ease' is largely internal and completely different for everyone according to their disposition!
5:39 I don't know what that means "people love grouping 'everything' into extremes". We do not group 'everything' into extremes. We have Good and Evil and Neutral; with a spectrum on either side of Neutral moving towards Good and Evil. 5:42 It depends what you mean by A. I. here. Robots to punch holes in a car factory is not Deep Mind. An a. i. to flag all the swear words online for example, is not an autonomous drone swarm programmed to search for and destroy one man. 6:26 Again; humans
sit on the Good/Evil spectrum like all things. There is no limit to how good or evil a human can be. The majorly 'good' humans always inhabit a world in which the majorly 'evil' humans are also present; since their level of 'goodness' is developed in response to the level of 'evil' which they perceive. The scales sometimes tip one way or the other. However; when the scale tips to the point that evil is sitting on the ground; then that's it. There's not possibility for good to move downwards again. And vice versa of course! Which means that if 'Good' hits the ground; Evil can never resurge again. It's a choice between eternal hell with no way out or paradise with no demise. Of course; no human is 'fundamentally' evil. It's a conditioned state and an illness. And curable. Which is why I reject the death penalty with all my heart.
5:39 I don't know what that means "people love grouping 'everything'
into extremes". We do not group 'everything' into extremes. We have Good
and Evil and Neutral; with a spectrum on either side of Neutral moving
towards Good and Evil. 5:42 It depends what you mean by A. I. here.
Robots to punch holes in a car factory is not Deep Mind. An a. i. to
flag all the swear words online for example, is not an autonomous drone
swarm programmed to search for and destroy one man. 6:26 Again; humans
sit on the Good/Evil spectrum like all things. There is no limit to how
good or evil a human can be. The majorly 'good' humans always inhabit a
world in which the majorly 'evil' humans are also present; since their
level of 'goodness' is developed in response to the level of 'evil'
which they perceive. The scales sometimes tip one way or the other.
However; when the scale tips to the point that evil is sitting on the
ground; then that's it. There's not possibility for good to move
downwards again. And vice versa of course! Which means that if 'Good'
hits the ground; Evil can never resurge again. It's a choice between
eternal hell with no way out or paradise with no demise.
5:33 At this level, yes. Because all decisions are based on the computation of data. It is not sentient and therefore has no emotional intelligence. Human intelligence is not purely 'intellectual'. Emotional intelligence enables humans to make faster decisions WITHOUT conceptual thought; bypassing the 'computational' aspect of the brain. This is a facility which enables a human to move at maximum speed straight from the heart center; which a. i. does not possess. The other reason why a. i. is evil; is because like most 'science' projects; it was developed for corporate profit. It is the bi-product of corporate capitalism. Of course; you can't 'technically' say that a. i. is evil as such; because it's not sentient. However; what is built by Evil is inheritently evil in itself. It's an extension of his being. Although we are told that it will 'cure' this, that and the other diseases; this is not why it was developed. 6:04 Stickin' to my guns on this one. Sorry if I'm a simpleton.
7:49 Well no. I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT realise this! WHICH people on earth is it going to get 'a whole lot easier' for? The ones who were not in the anthill when it got bulldozed? 😳
7:17 Who's it takin' over here? Zuck? 😳 He needs to work on his dancing I think.
If AI ever takes over it will rightly conclude that the infestation of humans on the earth is a bad thing and will take intimidate steps to reduce their numbers.
7:07 Yep. I'M WITH HIM ALL THE WAY!
7:55 MUSKS FEARS ARE 100% VALID AND A. I. SHOULD BE REVERSE ENGINEERED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE! 😳
yeah AI is indeed scary!
learn English ... afraid "from" clear your ears :D
No. It's 'Elon Musk is AFRAID' - from Google. It's a message 'from' Google 'about' Elon.
Hi
Hello. 🙏🖤
Heey