Ironic, don't you smell? Honest Americans think about and consider these issues. However, modern American "law enforcers" are MORE consistent with WWII NAZIs than true Peace Officers AND "just follow odors.....oops orders" AND NEVER consider "lawful"......
I literally do not give a f about bump stocks. If anyone wants to be a Karen then they need to re evaluate the last 5 or so years and see the long game
What torques me off about most lawyers who talk about guns, is that they constantly talk about Federal and State Laws, but they never talk about Constitutional Law, which is Supreme Law and any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void. The Supreme Court said that any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void. Lawyers need to grow a Spine and band together and take on these UnConstitutional Laws. What people don't understand is that Doctors are far more deadly than Guns ever will be. Doctors are responsible for over 8 Billion People's Deaths since the 1960s, in the United States alone. As a Journalist, I get these reports all the time. Wake up People, this Country is on the tipping point of not being the United States, but a totally different Country.
*Remember it is always about the paycheck. A bust like this is easy pickings with little risk and ones arrest metrics look good come next performance review.*
@blackrifle6736 That's right. Go for the "low hanging fruit" and the establishment knows that the honest citizens will pay the attorney and the fines.. all that looks good to the public and helps fuel the "industry." Edit- typos corrected.
@@maxnomad8561there's ignorance of the law and then there's the code book that's eight feet thick and changes from state to state and county to county. Simple common sense gun laws yes but what law abiding citizens are expected to follow, which change on a whim, would be a full time job. Gun scholars can't even agree on the meaning of some of these laws, How is John Q Public supposed to?
There is an army vet in my town who sold a gun to a guy who wasnt allowed one. The story is he went to buy it and the guy asked him if he is a felon to which he replied jokingly “ive been in 40 years” or something like that, i forget the quote. But long story short this 70 yr old man is going to die in prison and like 340 guns are being sold of his through family. I bought 2. A .17HMR and a .22 hornet. Both for $200 plus ammo and scope. Its sad. BUT. His legacy will live on bc im telling my kids and grandchildren this story when i hand these guns to them…..over my dead body ofc😅 i love rimfire. Wnd yes ik hornet is center but the recoil isnt like a centerfire either.
Shall not be infringed doesn't mean what you think. It doesn't mean - and therefore no limitations can be applied. It simply means you can own a firearm...which we can. It doesn't mean - therefore you can own a bazooka.
@staledorito6174 no you should not need a license for full automatic that is still a form of regulation. Before 1984 there were very little crime with full automatic gun. Just like today they want ARs banned and they are on the low side for crime.
@@AlexHernandez-ee5hdshall not be infringed. but i understand your point. I’d counter that with just because a judge says it’s not unconstitutional doesn’t mean that it isn’t.
@@clydemarshall8095 Why would they criminalize possession of property and not go after the ones doing the crimes? Because they want to impose on anybody who owns anything they don’t like. It sounds like these stupid laws were made by some insolent old lawmakers with no common sense whatsoever.
I had an leo explain to me that when dealing with a suspect, they will find something that they can use to hold or be useful in prosecuting an individual. Laws seem to be in place not to prevent any crime but to trip citzens up in a web of legal problems.
In My Humble Opinion, Unfortunately, that is probably closer to the mark than most people realize👍🤠🤣‼️ I am NOT saying that I agree with the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME, I'm just saying that your statement is closer to the truth than anything that the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME says to the contrary In My Humble Opinion !!
@@texastomsshavingtips6359 You should probably start agreeing with the Socialist regime, because this problem is one of the big things we address. Late stage capitalism breeds this type of corruption for the cops, prosecutors, and judges to keep lining their pockets.
@lorettacaputo6997 Don’t forget. I learned this lesson first hand. COPS ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS!! They ARE SNAKES!!!! But to add to your point. The cops job is to get you in jail and return to duty as fast as humanly possible.. it’s messed up. And I learned that and will never forget it.
Just be careful. Anyone who calls marijuana and gun laws a liberal trap is quite stupid. Liberals are federally legalizing with a prescription, and will be classifying marijuana the same as alcohol as soon as they control congress. Gun laws that trip people up are at the state level because feds don't go after people for this kind of thing so technicalities in federal law mean nothing unless you are doing something to get on the radar of the FBI which is not easy. It is the states that passed state statutes for things like marijuana so they can use any officer in the entire state against you. Red states are by far the worst about marijuana and overcharging. I am getting my prescription the second the process biden started finishes up and marijuana is reclassified to be legal with a prescription. My red state will be powerless which is great. Screw trump and his anti-american globalism.
One item not mentioned…Hearing Protection Act….it should NOT be a federal crime to have a suppression device without a tax stamp. They are used specifically to protect hearing! Wish you would have mentioned that. I know Trump Jr. Is a huge proponent. Suppression devices do not kill unless used as a club. They should be readily available WITHOUT ANY permission needed to legal gun owners. Huge pain point. Keep doing what you do. I enjoy your vids and info sir 🤘💪
Actually, Trump has gone on record saying at one point not long ago that he “didn’t like suppressors. Can we just ban them?” Trump is NOT pro 2A or anything shooting related.
@@austindiaz6767You are correct. I somehow missed that. That said, I would highly question whether or not his words are genuine given his father’s track record with the second amendment and tendency to run his mouth.
Uh you can't even defend someone else if they are in danger or being robbed Unless your protecting a elected official or their family member then it's OK 😅 Laws are for you not them that's being proven daily
@@lancekrystoff9619 I DO agree with you, however they are held to an oath. If each upheld their own personal beliefs, ideals and feelings that were not based in the bylaws they agreed to uphold, I’d think the word “rogue” could be applied. I do support law enforcement 💯 and do my best to not give them anything they would question. I do have concerns with how I would be judged if I had to protect myself or fam. I’m just too naive.
America now goes after citizens before criminals. Anything to protect criminals...and the minimum for citizens, stance on justice is disgusting. All these anti-2nd politicians should just renounce their armed security. We damn sure shouldn't have to pay for it.
@@frankfields2071 Forget about gun laws, politics, and making California not communist. At your age you should be in prayer, asking Jesus Christ to take you away to His Kingdom before its too late.
In a country where we are supposed to be free and have the "right" to own and carry guns. You would think that you couldn't go to jail for mistakes or minor stuff. The fact that owning something you have a right to can cost you your freedom means you are not free. In a free society, if you made a mistake, you wouldn't be facing 10+ years in jail. The fact that anyone can say we are free is beyond delusional. It's like thanking your plantation Master for giving you a job. It just doesn't make sense. The Sons of Liberty would have been disgusted with us.
You should add that 10+ years in prison is cruel and unusual punishment and should be considered treason by itself on whoever imposed that law on us. Also the fine is purposeful to cause people to become destitute and purposefully broke which still amounts to a cruel and unusual punishment. Also, sending people to prison for not complying with their demands is an easy way for the Judicial system to garner some very serious enemies. These are facts, it is literally based in our Constitution but they don’t apply Constitutional standards when they violate the law to impose on people. They purposely ignore the Constitutional laws they are supposed to reference against their own Court dockets and that is the problem I am trying to bring awareness of.
Steve Dettelbach, head of the BATF, has never personally owned and has never been issued a firearm. He considers himself an expert on firearms. He is anything but an expert based upon his statements. His actual expertise: Civil rights lawyer.
They seemed so happy that they could infringe on peoples rights for life. Maybe they should read the book three felonies a day before they start getting so excited, they aren't the law abiding citizens they think they are, they just haven't gotten caught yet.
1) a well regulated militia 2) being necessary for the security of a free State. Missed some big qualifiers there. The 2A isn’t 1) whatever guns you want 2) for your security.
@@boombox05 The hell it doesn't. John Adams was asked by a merchant whether he could put cannon on his ships to fight off pirates. Adams' reply was basically, "If you feel you need cannon on your ships, hell yes, put cannon on them."
Never Register anything, assemble your own Defense Tools from parts Kits, learn some milling on the way. Print your own PETG, Ceramic and CFK accesories. Dont "sell" ammo, "sit next to" your friend while they reload "by themself"
the lack of due process for protective orders being able to strip your constitutional rights is absolutely outrageous. Also having suppressors are considered obligatory in many countries that are far more restrictive than the US as a courteous gesture to your neighbors as well as for your own hearing protection, it blows my mind that what is essentially a gun muffler is a restricted item.
Have you ever had a protective order against another person? It involves going to court and providing proof they are a danger to you. That's due process. I've had a stalker and was happy to hear their unstable a$5 couldn't legally aquire a gun.
People don't have protective orders issued against them without reason. If someone acts irrationally or threatens others, they shouldn't be allowed to carry a gun.
@@Newt94 I think it's a tricky issue, but the problem is that in a lot of states, protective orders are issued pretty much automatically, especially if the claimant is a woman and the alleged aggressor is a man. The standard is "preponderance of evidence", not "beyond reasonable doubt", and they are always itchy with that "trigger finger" to put the order in place because from their perspective, the risks of getting it wrong with a false negative (order was needed but not issued) are much worse than getting it wrong with a false positive (order was issued but not needed).
This video is very important. Every first gun owner should watch this video and be aware of one's state's law on firearms, even the small details. Thank you!
This video is very important and every gun owner should watch, that's for certain. Every gun owner should watch this and understand what a Fudd is, someone who defends the right to keep their bolt-action hunting rifle but, otherwise, doesn't give a rat's-tail about the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment's protection of the right to keep and bear arms.
how about enacting FEDERAL GUN LAWS - how many more innocent folks have to die because every yahoo is 'carrying a firearm' (second amendment says REGULATED MILITIA - not everyone each to his/her own - with guns aplenty...the gun lobby is twisting the constitution for their own sick purposes - grow up.
This video gets barrel length wrong every time. Sixteen inches is an ecceptable rifle length. The change comes when the barrel is less than sixteen inches
I’d rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6. This philosophy has saved my ass more than once . Always look to deescalate , especially when carrying a gun , this has also saved me . Lastly don’t start any won’t be any , also has saved me . If you think you’re a tough guy cause you carry a gun maybe you shouldn’t.
If people really took being an American seriously they would not comply with any gun control laws whatsoever. When you understand how and why this nation was founded, it is rediculous that so many just drop to their knee's. I hope more people wake up and stop complying. There are millions of us. Dont forget that.
@@MrJSchiedelthe nation was founded by rebels fighting their government, they hated 3 things, Taxes, the King, and the government trying to take their guns
@@kennykash6089 the point is that 16” barrels are legal and less than 16” are illegal, this guy keep saying that 16” or less are illegal and that’s Incorrect and misleading
I agree. What is maddening is that in any fact situation where a “fine line” exists between a lawful / unlawful action, you can pretty much depend on some Democrat, Soros bought-and-paid-for, eager beaver prosecutor to opt to go for a full bore prosecution. They will ALWAYS go with the “interpretation” that is least advantageous for the hapless citizen. Also, their obedient lap dogs in the MSM will always broadcast the Leftist narrative (lie) to the public to paint you in the worst light possible and contaminate any potential jury pool of your “peers.”
The bump stock debacle was Trump taking lousy advice from Wayne LaPierre assuming he represented gun owners! I have ceased contributing to NRA until Wayne steps down!
Correct. Trump is a businessman and entertainer, NOT a "gun guy". So yes, he took bad advice on something he had little knowledge of and made a huge mistake. However, it was a mistake, and not part of a larger PLAN of hard-core gun control like Joe Biden has pushed for.
Imagine saying you're a pro 2A advocate, then explain how you submitted to the a f t and turned in your bumpstock. Yes, my lord, I shall bend my knee to your tyranny.
As long as you don't intend to commit crimes with a gun it should be perfectly legal to carry it. Just saying that the gun in ,and of itself shouldn't be a crime, committing a crime with a gun should be the illegal part.
What if they make it illegal to own or obtain or carry said gun? Now your argument is invalid because simply owning the gun is committing a crime. You're bound to either become an unarmed boot licking law abiding citizen, or you're going to become a criminal by simply owning a firearm. Pick your poison.
The problem is they use pre-crime laws involving our gun rights out of concern for others to impose on us. Let me give you some examples: -If you end up on probation for something minor you can’t own anything they say you can’t and they expect you to “transfer” or “sell” said property. -Any law they can impose on us even if we have absolutely no malicious intent whatsoever to misuse our property(guns), it’s all a control tactic is all it is based on mob rule by compliance squads that will kill you if you don’t comply. That is how I view much of these problems. They expect you to give up your right to self-defense if they demand you do even if your life could be at stake if you gave up your guns and they don’t care if you die because of them. That’s the problem.
If they don't regain their rights, then how is their debt paid? How can they be considered free from discrimination? How can they ever feel fully accepted as a free American citizen? Why should they have any less of a right to protect themselves or their family? Why shouldn't they have a voice in the voting process?
I really enjoyed this video it's a topic a lot of people don't talk about. I'm a jailer and you'll be surprised how often people accidentally come in jail because they didn't know guns and weed don't mix
Protective Orders: I used to live in Maryland and I was not as versed in the laws as I am now. I left my wife and she filed an order of protection out of spite and the judge even said he didn't feel I was a danger but he was going to "err on the side of caution." Two days later a Maryland state police officer showed up at my front door and told me I had to relinquish my firearms. I owed two pistols at the time and without warrant they searched my home and confiscated my firearms. I did not receive a receipt or any type of notification from them that said they were taking my weapons. I never got those weapons back. Know your rights and the laws and you can avoid illegal seizure like this.
SBR rule is especially important if you live in a place like Kansas City which has the Missouri/Kansas border splitting it down the middle. Have to be careful where you drive and shoot.
I live here and when I got my suppressor which doesn't follow the same rules as sbrs. They told me of a guy who broke up with his gf and he went across state lines with both and she called the ATF. He's a felon and serving like 10 years bc he didn't tell them of the sbr.
@@quintonhays371 That’s why it’s important to get petitions and flyers of said petitions to end these illegal infringements of our Rights. What they are doing to our gun rights is illegal. The Constitution forbids these Unconstitutional rules from being enforced, the Constitution is for the Courts to look at to make sure they are not violating any Constitutional laws or the Bill of Rights. They are purposely avoiding using Constitutional references in Court because these Federal Judges know they will lose. I say this because Constitution.US explains that the Constitution is there to tell them what they are allowed to do and what is not allowed.
4:00 The part they left out about the Bumpstocks is that Trump banned them after the Mandalay Bay Mass Shooting. It wasn't suddenly, all sensible Gun Owners probably saw it coming after the Media started touting that the Shooter used Weapons fitted with Bumpstocks. This isn't me saying I support Trumps decision whatsoever, Trump did a good many things that left a sour taste for me while he was in Office regarding Firearms, but the way they sort of ducked out of what actually happened with Bumpstocks seemed somewhat short sighted to me.
And from watching this video gun owners as well. So long as the attitude exists that you can deny rights to a person forever because you think they're a bad person based on something they may or may not have done in their past there will always be opportunity for government to find new ways to make prohibited persons. That's what the gca was for, it was gun control and a easy way was create felons then disarm them it ranges from 10-24% of state populations with Florida and Texas being the highest as prohibited persons. With numbers that high if these people were dangerous we'd be war zones. At least Texas allows non violent felons to have firearms for self defense on their property five years after all time and probation is done. Feds can still charge them but state can't.
Great vid as usual. As gun carriers--and I hope all day, every day, 24/7--we've got to be a bit smarter than the average bear. Don't go out drinking even one drink while armed. Get a water. Drink at home and get as blitzed as you want. Don't mix rec pot with carrying. Don't get into a sit where you get a protective order thrown on you: if it's falling apart, let the other person go their way. Don't go to seedy parts of town (what's there, anyway!?!). Don't speed on the highway. Don't run stop signs. Don't fall prey to road rage--Jeepers, let the other guy get ahead and be the first one at the next red light! Don't show a firearm to try to de-escalate. Keep 'em away from kiddos. Be responsible and be an adult. I've used these rules every day since 1979 and it has worked for me so far. The gun, like the fire extinguisher, is a tool. We don't pull out our fire extinguishers willy-nilly just to show them off.
I would add a few things: don't buy anything that might attract thieves and home invaders. For the same reason, keep you property looking dilapidated (better yet, don't own property, rent a small apartment instead). Ride a bus. Don't wear new or nice clothes. Never visit a restaurant, just buy groceries, lest somebody thinks you have extra money to steal. Don't get a well-paying job, because that money will attract robbers/thieves. Don't date women, they are the ones with protective orders. Always run away from conflicts, because standing up for yourself leads to "escalation". Yep, just be a compliant little mouse/pushover/doormat, and let everyone else run your life. 😂😂 One exception: you can absolutely, positively get angry over a UA-cam comment. It's quite safe. Just don't express it as a threatening reply, or I might report you and you might get in trouble. Do you see what I'm getting at, wise one? While there is some wisdom in your words, some things you simply can't avoid or evade in this life. Your philosophy is that of complete compliance with the government. Well, might as well give up that gun, you'll never use it even if you have to, and it's not what the Second Amendment was for.
@@user-io2ym6gm8z Now you're just being silly. The advice he gave is beneficial to most and will help keep people out of trouble. However this is social media and even a post expressing how beautiful and sunny the day is, will be met by someone with some silly negative commentary about it.
@@charlesdonahue3667 I'm not being silly. I'm being sarcastic. I'm highlighting what his way of thinking amounts to. "A firearm is a government-licensed toy that I'm lucky to hold in my hand". Instead of, you know, CONSTITUTIONAL right. And it's always hard to deal with partial-truth comments. But I think I said "there is some wisdom in your words", a point that you missed, obviously. I'm only really against "don't get into a sit where you get a protective order" and "don't show firearm to de-escalate". The first one is dumb and completely unconstitutional, a random angry chick should be able to take away your rights, and the second one is just plain dumb. In the first one, "don't get into a sit" advice tells you not get into something you have no control over getting into. With the other one, What am I going to wait until he actually attacks me so that I'm forced to kill him in self-defense? And then have to go through the legal and financial nightmare of proving my innocence? Instead of simply showing the gun as a warning and getting him to back off?
@@user-io2ym6gm8z Anyone reading your commentary understood it was sarcasm, they also understood it was silly. Someone posted a video offering practical advice on how to avoid legal trouble relative to EDC and you viewed it as an opportunity to joke. The First Amendment protects your right to do so. Your decision to hyperbolize the video's message to make a rant about constitutionality reveals your temperament. It's up to readers to decide if they choose to be influenced by such commentary in matters concerning their legal rights and safety.
Explain to me how an alcoholic can have a 50 cal. but a person who is perscribed medical cannabis can't even have a .22lr pistol. Stoners have rights too. Hell, Oxycodone blows marijuana out of the water and that is fine to have and own guns.
Yeah, when push comes to shove, I'm just gonna say, "The form said, 'are you an illegal user of marijuana'" Nope, I bought by bud legally, from a dispensary, taxed and everything. I'll let the cards fall where they do. It's not like they don't have a database for both, if they really cared about people not having both, they would just prohibit you with red flags by cross referencing the two. But they don't want that, they want to be able to disarm you, period, but they can't do that without a reason, so they have it the way it is now. You can buy both, legally, but can't have both legally. Stupid. edit: this will effectively turn you into a felon and thus unable to have a firearm, ever. Thats their plan. They can't call it an honest score if there is no net, that's why they leave the net.
@jimyeats you're under the assumption I watched the screen while listening. So your idea of occasionally happens to be repeatedly in one video...yeah, don't tell me what I should and shouldn't do.
@@benlastname6667 My point noting your comment is that you would had to have been looking at your screen, thus seeing the fact that they are putting information and corrections on the screen.
All that was heard here was how the gov wants you the law abiding firearm owner jailed. While nothing happens to the criminal ...it's only and always about taking constitutional rights away
You should mention that only vertical foregrips are illegal on AR pistols. Angled foregrips will not make you a felon if you put one on an AR pistol. This is for owners using a brace who have not paid a tax stamp for a SBR.
Fun fact: We have one of the most restrictive weapon laws in the world here in Germany. However, foregrips on ARs are legal for everyone and if you have a hunting license, you can go to the store and buy as many suppressors as you want without any issue. 😅
There should be legal repercussions for establishments that disarm their patrons and don’t provide for their security. If they can sue a manufacturer of the firearm then this seems like a very small logical step in comparison
You technically could sue them, it just hasn't been done before. You would have a case technically, you are being disarmed, thus the establishment is directly liable for anything that happens to you if they don't have security to protect you. But you would have to probably have such an event occur for a court to listen, because you would clearly have standing then. Otherwise, most courts won't listen to hypotheticals, but the law as written states that standing is gained either a) by an event occurring, or b) by the potential of an event occurring to you. Such as a law being passed, like the Trans laws in Tennessee for example. The laws would make being Trans in public illegal, so a) would effect anyone that is arrested for breaking the new law, but b) applies to all Trans people in the state, because there is the "potential" for them to be arrested. Try to file a lawsuit, see what happens, I would honestly be very interested to see, because I do honestly agree with you.
I have always said the GUN FREE zones are the most dangerous place to be. Law abiding citizens, will comply, but what about the criminal? You stand no chance at those places.
Check local laws to a lot of times the sign carries no legal ramifications. Just means you can’t open carry. In my state if you’re caught concealed carrying in a “gun free zone” the most that can be done is you are asked to leave the private property.
Being one of these so called law abiding citizens would mean you follow only the supreme law of the land right. I know how to read and my reading comprehension has been scaled very high on tests, so carry what you want, when you want, how you want. Enough said
You might want to clarify exactly who classifies as a prohibited person. Your description was simply someone who cannot buy a gun from an FFL, but it's a little more nuanced. For example, in some states 18- 20-year-olds cannot purchase a handgun from an FFL but they can via private party transaction. They aren't prohibited persons.
The 18-20yr olds not able to purchase handguns just got shutdown by a judge ruling it unconstitutional. Now the ATF will appeal of course as always but they arent going to win due to Bruen. Now NICS will needs to be changed to allow the purchase, but currently they can now legally purchase handguns.
Not a lawyer, but my understanding of the law is that it's legal to sell ammo you made, but it's not legal to make ammo with the intent to sell. Much like firearms bought with a C&R FFL. Legal to sell them, but not legal to use the C&R to acquire them with the intent to sell.
Don't make NICS mandatory for private sales. Available, fine. But only way to enforce mandatory NICS is a 100% registry. After registry will come confiscation. Illinois is enacting a sweeping "Assault Weapon" registry and even before law goes into effect a state house rep was talking about legislation to use registry to confiscate those guns.
I had a stalker that was threatening me with violence and setting ambush in parking lots of stores i patron. After two police reports, the third incident happened right in front of my front door of my unit, and the guy came running out of his front door and was not visible to me because he was running behind my truck to get at me. I drew my 9 mm full-size MMP one in the chamber no safety out of a Blackhawk Serpa holster And pointed it at him and he retreated. He called the police and claimed that I drew my firearm and pointed it at him as he was standing in his doorway. So after I was cuffed up and ready to go to jail, I showed the arresting officers the video And I told them that they would’ve mag dumped on this guy and they agreed 100%. They also agreed that I showed self restraint by not squeezing the trigger. USCCA that I was a member of for several years did not answer my collect phone calls, and when they saw the video they did not take my case. The DA dropped the case but I still had to pay for an attorney out-of-pocket. Do not waste your money on USCCA open your own bank account for savings That you can use when you need a real attorney and not these fake fools from USCCA. This happened in Salt Lake City Utah 33rd south and State Street.
@@RoryMartel video that spoke all the words I needed. DA never even took the case to court and USCCA didn’t answer any phone calls so I canceled them.. good luck on your vote for Kamala
Supreme Court ruled that bump stocks are not machine guns, also, recently a Federal judge threw out a auto possession case stating that the 1933 ban on them were unconstitutional.
SCOTUS 1876, shall not be infringed by Congress. The 2A does not give you gun rights, It prevents Congress from making laws that take away rights you were BORN with.
So after watching this video it occurs to me a lot of folks in Utah probably have insurance based self defense programs. If you defend yourself and in the process decide to plea out your insurance based protection ends. Check it out “he ain’t lyin” So a shameless plug checkout AOR or Attorneys for Freedom because if you have any of the issues talked about here they WILL take the case and defend you. They are criminal defense attorneys and offer self defense coverage for you and your family. “Not a paid affiliate or spokes person for Attorneys on Retainer” I’m not you just don’t want to find out you are not covered when you thought you were.
You can sell to someone out of state if a rifle/shotgun and let them leave with it. You can also sell a handgun to someone out of state but they can't take it as it has to be shipped to their home state to an FFL.
Eh, maybe you should do some more research on the rifle/shotgun situation. The GCA pretty much says Licensees (FFLs) at their premises may sell/transfer long guns to out of state residents, non-licensees must transfer them through a licensee. Each sate also has their specifics on importing/transferring firearms to their residents. USCCA, and a few others have good articles on it.
My thing with the stock/pistol grip is like why would you not want people owning those to potentially install an attachment to have more accurate shots?😂 like wouldn’t you want people to be more accurate and Arguably safer shooters? Crazy concept right
In My Humble Opinion, The problem with your question is that they do NOT want an armed population, they want a Dis/Un-Armed population that they can CONTROL !! An armed population can fight back against their TYRANNY, whereas a Dis/Un-Armed population must submit to their TYRANNY, or face the RETRIBUTION of the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME !! The preceding statements are MY OPINIONS, and as such, I realize and understand that it is within the realm of possibility that your opinions might conceivably be different from MY OPINIONS, no matter how implausible and unlikely that scenario would actually be, it does remain to be a slight possibility !!
Push 2 pins and separate the upper from the lower, and you no longer have an SBR in your position. No matter if it is a pistol brace, or just a rifle lower. Anything other than a registered SBR lower. If you travel with it separate it. Now you are only carrying parts..
@@evanwells6284 Do you know what doesn’t make sense about the ATF’s dumb law about SBR’s? If you register a lower as an SBR it still doesn’t make it an SBR but they have it as such if you registered it. You could have a SBR lower for the purpose of building a perfectly legal ar platform pistol which is not considered a SBR by the ATF’s definition. You could even categorize gun parts by category and that doesn’t mean you have any intent to make an SBR, but they still think they have the power to manufacture people into criminals for intent based on parts alone even if you wanted to build an ar platform pistol not a SBR. You see the flaws in these dumb laws are what I call obvious infringements for example you could have stocks for the sole purpose of building 16” rifles in a pile of parts in one category and ar platform pistol parts in another categorized pile, so do they just get to misconstrue criminal charges based on their own decision of parts and what they think a person wants to use it for? I call complete bs on ATF’s logic on this one.
This is why government shouldn't have so much control. The entire sections regarding law just had me shaking my head. How can old-kroons issue these laws that make no sense yet hide behind fully armed military-like security.
One mistake.. I have a California drivers misc , with my Nevada address ,which is where I live... I am a resident of Nevada, my California drivers lisc. says so... I have bought a gun with it, I was passed by the Nevada dept of public safety and I was told by a ATF agent at a gun show in Reno years ago, when I handed him my actual drivers lisc to answer my question, he said as long as it had an actual street address on it and not a P.O. Box ,I could buy a gun in Nevada... The ATF has the definition of resident on its website..
The protective order thing is unconstitutional, so clearly that those laws can't be enforced without committing the worst crime in this country, violating the constitutional protected rights on a citizen. All law enforcement and judges are supposed to lose their qualified immunity because violating the constitutional rights of citizens is not qualifying for immunity and they must be charged!
All lawyers need to be pushing hard to get all law enforcement and judges prosecuted when they clearly violate citizens constitutional rights. Ignorance to the law is not a valid defence. And the Constitution is the highest law in this country.
I had a guy at work put a forward grip on a AR Pistol and I explained to him that if he didn't remove it he might be going to jail! He was going for the cool factor not knowing any Class III laws or how to google!
Less thab 16in.... notb16in or less, tes theres a differen.16in is fine, 15.9in is where problems start The protective order.... turns u into a prohibited person, not just can't carry but u cant own. Lots of little yet important mistakes in this video
This happened to me in Pennsylvania 😂. Courts dropped the charges thanks to the lawyer I had thanks to having a clean record. I got hit with disorderly conduct and aggravated assault in a 4v1 situation with my first gun. When I look back I’m glad it played out how it did because after I started paying attention to laws. I’m not a fan of sitting in a small room with a bunch of funky dudes 24/7. No fresh air 🥶
AR with a barrel 16” or less is an SBR now? 🤔 16” is legal along with any pin & welded muzzle device creating a 16” overall barrel length (13.7-14.5 depending on muzzle device length)!
You keep saying 16" or shorter for an SBR. It's only on rifles with barrels shorter than 16". You can have a barrel that is 16" and a stock on it and you will only have a rifle, not a Short Barreled Rifle. And a vertical grip also. But just anything with a barrel shorter than 16" cannot have a stock or a vertical grip without an SBR tax stamp.
They're Fudds. Obey beyond the law. Surrender more rights than otherwise forced. Next the might be asking to just turn in those nasty fully semi-automatic weapons.
@@JaredaSohn And have you measured those "16 inch" barrels? How long are they to the thousandths place? I don't know how the law is written, but if it doesn't specify a tolerance and temperature under which the measurement is to be taken, you're talking about non-compliance in certain conditions.
The problem is there are so many of them who really don’t understand that they are persecuting their own friends, family and partners with these illegal and Unconstitutional laws. These are my beliefs. The other fact is these are factions of people using force against individual people who don’t comply even if they have done nothing criminal with their own property. That is where the problem lies.
Constitutional carry. We are all entitled to self defense by virtue of citizenship and not being criminals. And we should absolutely be allowed any type of firearm.
Ignorance is no excuse they say,but when the laws are changed like a pair of panties there will be accidental violations..by mostly law abiding citizens that doesn't even have a background to check.without reasonable doubt supposed to mean something
Finally a great analysis with some humor injected that helps keeps viewers interested and paying attention to how easy it is to end up in prison regarding weapons.
Jim, you start off saying that Utah is the most permissive state for gun laws, yet not 30 seconds later we find out that brandishing is a misdemeanor there. Here in New Hampshire, brandishing isn't even illegal.
1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. 2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: 4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. 5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. 6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing. 7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour Romans 13:1-7 KJV Seek Jesus with everything you have while you can. Love Him more than guns.
Go to learbackfire.com/ or call 800-707-4575 to receive up to $15,000 in FREE bonus metals with a qualified purchase.
Ironic, don't you smell? Honest Americans think about and consider these issues. However, modern American "law enforcers" are MORE consistent with WWII NAZIs than true Peace Officers AND "just follow odors.....oops orders" AND NEVER consider "lawful"......
I literally do not give a f about bump stocks. If anyone wants to be a Karen then they need to re evaluate the last 5 or so years and see the long game
I wish you'd stop saying 16" or less.....IT'S Less than 16", there is a difference
What torques me off about most lawyers who talk about guns, is that they constantly talk about Federal and State Laws, but they never talk about Constitutional Law, which is Supreme Law and any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void.
The Supreme Court said that any law that violates the United States Constitution is Null and Void.
Lawyers need to grow a Spine and band together and take on these UnConstitutional Laws.
What people don't understand is that Doctors are far more deadly than Guns ever will be.
Doctors are responsible for over 8 Billion People's Deaths since the 1960s, in the United States alone.
As a Journalist, I get these reports all the time. Wake up People, this Country is on the tipping point of not being the United States, but a totally different Country.
They didn’t clarify, have a gun and marijuana, or have a gun while using marijuana.
So much time and energy is spent towards law-abiding citizens. Imagine if they use those resources to fight real crime instead.
*Remember it is always about the paycheck. A bust like this is easy pickings with little risk and ones arrest metrics look good come next performance review.*
Welcome to communism
@blackrifle6736 That's right. Go for the "low hanging fruit" and the establishment knows that the honest citizens will pay the attorney and the fines.. all that looks good to the public and helps fuel the "industry."
Edit- typos corrected.
they did at one point. they really need to learn the saying, "just because you, doesn't mean you should"
Problem reaction solution...order out of chaos
If you can legitimately accidentally go to PRISON the police AND legislators are THE problem.
if "ignorance of the law is no defence" then we all need to have a good education in law from the earliest age.
That is the intent. Make any laws that make you a criminal and make the gun unsafe.
How else would they make money? Trust minor laws ruin lives. Lmk if you want to hear one person's experience, soon as I turned 18 I was a target.
@@maxnomad8561there's ignorance of the law and then there's the code book that's eight feet thick and changes from state to state and county to county. Simple common sense gun laws yes but what law abiding citizens are expected to follow, which change on a whim, would be a full time job. Gun scholars can't even agree on the meaning of some of these laws, How is John Q Public supposed to?
There is an army vet in my town who sold a gun to a guy who wasnt allowed one. The story is he went to buy it and the guy asked him if he is a felon to which he replied jokingly “ive been in 40 years” or something like that, i forget the quote. But long story short this 70 yr old man is going to die in prison and like 340 guns are being sold of his through family. I bought 2. A .17HMR and a .22 hornet. Both for $200 plus ammo and scope. Its sad. BUT. His legacy will live on bc im telling my kids and grandchildren this story when i hand these guns to them…..over my dead body ofc😅 i love rimfire. Wnd yes ik hornet is center but the recoil isnt like a centerfire either.
“Shall not be infringed” has been infringed upon over 22k times
More then that.. all of those people who spent time for nothing.
read again @@mister_walter_sobchak
@@mister_walter_sobchakthe right of people
🎯 exactly
Shall not be infringed doesn't mean what you think. It doesn't mean - and therefore no limitations can be applied. It simply means you can own a firearm...which we can. It doesn't mean - therefore you can own a bazooka.
The fact that there is even a video titled like this is a clear indicator as to how much out rights are being violated...
No firearm or firearm accessories should be illegal. The only thing that should be illegal is using the stuff to commit a crime.
Exactly! Yes! Somebody finally said it!
Agree if u can legally own a gun it should be any gun available
Straight to the point:)
I do think you should have to get a license for full auto weapons but agree
@staledorito6174 no you should not need a license for full automatic that is still a form of regulation. Before 1984 there were very little crime with full automatic gun. Just like today they want ARs banned and they are on the low side for crime.
I love how half these laws are so clearly tyrannical/unconstitutional yet nothing will ever be done about it. We are living on borrowed time.
2a
They aren't unconstitutional, but they are exceptionally controlling.
All gun laws are unconstitutional. If you say otherwise you are a collaborator.
@@AlexHernandez-ee5hdshall not be infringed. but i understand your point. I’d counter that with just because a judge says it’s not unconstitutional doesn’t mean that it isn’t.
@@AlexHernandez-ee5hdanything that would in anyway undermine the ability to keep and bear arms is by definition unconstitutional.
So many American gun laws are just plain stupid.
Literally all of them.
@@clydemarshall8095
Why would they criminalize possession of property and not go after the ones doing the crimes? Because they want to impose on anybody who owns anything they don’t like.
It sounds like these stupid laws were made by some insolent old lawmakers with no common sense whatsoever.
They are well thought through....they serve the purpose they were intented. Stopping populos from saying NO
Not stupid, unconstitutional! Abolish the ATF and repeal the NFA/GCA!
They aren't gun laws they are Constitutional infringements.
Plain and simple.
I had an leo explain to me that when dealing with a suspect, they will find something that they can use to hold or be useful in prosecuting an individual. Laws seem to be in place not to prevent any crime but to trip citzens up in a web of legal problems.
In My Humble Opinion,
Unfortunately, that is probably closer to the mark than most people realize👍🤠🤣‼️
I am NOT saying that I agree with the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME, I'm just saying that your statement is closer to the truth than anything that the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME says to the contrary In My Humble Opinion !!
@@texastomsshavingtips6359
You should probably start agreeing with the Socialist regime, because this problem is one of the big things we address. Late stage capitalism breeds this type of corruption for the cops, prosecutors, and judges to keep lining their pockets.
@lorettacaputo6997 Don’t forget. I learned this lesson first hand. COPS ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS!! They ARE SNAKES!!!! But to add to your point. The cops job is to get you in jail and return to duty as fast as humanly possible.. it’s messed up. And I learned that and will never forget it.
I think the number one way they do so is to engage one in conversation. And one makes some sort of admission.
Just be careful. Anyone who calls marijuana and gun laws a liberal trap is quite stupid. Liberals are federally legalizing with a prescription, and will be classifying marijuana the same as alcohol as soon as they control congress.
Gun laws that trip people up are at the state level because feds don't go after people for this kind of thing so technicalities in federal law mean nothing unless you are doing something to get on the radar of the FBI which is not easy. It is the states that passed state statutes for things like marijuana so they can use any officer in the entire state against you. Red states are by far the worst about marijuana and overcharging.
I am getting my prescription the second the process biden started finishes up and marijuana is reclassified to be legal with a prescription. My red state will be powerless which is great. Screw trump and his anti-american globalism.
One item not mentioned…Hearing Protection Act….it should NOT be a federal crime to have a suppression device without a tax stamp. They are used specifically to protect hearing! Wish you would have mentioned that. I know Trump Jr. Is a huge proponent. Suppression devices do not kill unless used as a club. They should be readily available WITHOUT ANY permission needed to legal gun owners. Huge pain point. Keep doing what you do. I enjoy your vids and info sir 🤘💪
Actually, Trump has gone on record saying at one point not long ago that he “didn’t like suppressors. Can we just ban them?”
Trump is NOT pro 2A or anything shooting related.
@@lancekrystoff9619 can you read he said trump jr
As long as the corrupt government can control you, gather information on you and take your money... they'll do it.
@@austindiaz6767You are correct. I somehow missed that.
That said, I would highly question whether or not his words are genuine given his father’s track record with the second amendment and tendency to run his mouth.
No guns or gun accessories should require tax, stamps, registration, or permission. Completely defeats the purpose of the 2nd.
Legal gun owners will always be under more scrutiny than a criminal, gotta love Weimerica
All criminals used to be considered law abiding gun owners.
@@chiwawa130 You don't have a leg to stand on with that.
Back the blue when they put you in jail for defending your life or your business?
Absolutely! I mean no! Or maybe? Please don’t bring logical questions to the comments section.
Uh you can't even defend someone else if they are in danger or being robbed
Unless your protecting a elected official or their family member then it's OK 😅
Laws are for you not them that's being proven daily
While I agree, it’s their job to enforce the ridiculous laws that are out there. They have to presume the worst with all.
@@Farnorthfarmer”Just doing your job” doesn’t cut it as an excuse for doing or partaking in something that is wrong.
@@lancekrystoff9619 I DO agree with you, however they are held to an oath. If each upheld their own personal beliefs, ideals and feelings that were not based in the bylaws they agreed to uphold, I’d think the word “rogue” could be applied. I do support law enforcement 💯 and do my best to not give them anything they would question. I do have concerns with how I would be judged if I had to protect myself or fam. I’m just too naive.
America now goes after citizens before criminals. Anything to protect criminals...and the minimum for citizens, stance on justice is disgusting. All these anti-2nd politicians should just renounce their armed security. We damn sure shouldn't have to pay for it.
A-effingmen.
That's evidence that there are many, too many, in government who actually believe that others don't deserve rights.
The pedo criminals are in government, most all are compromised and on film. This is who the cops protect and serve,,,not you.
For the record, there are now 27 States that legally allow permitless carry.
Awesome but commieforina is not one, where I'm stuck with age 78 and doctors in this democrap state
@@frankfields2071 Forget about gun laws, politics, and making California not communist. At your age you should be in prayer, asking Jesus Christ to take you away to His Kingdom before its too late.
29 now. (:
Doesnt matter. 2A trumps all state "laws",; 1A auditors do it all the time
Besides universal constitutional carry, ending the NFA are two key changes to make. No more registration and tax stamp for SBRs or silencers.
In a country where we are supposed to be free and have the "right" to own and carry guns. You would think that you couldn't go to jail for mistakes or minor stuff. The fact that owning something you have a right to can cost you your freedom means you are not free. In a free society, if you made a mistake, you wouldn't be facing 10+ years in jail. The fact that anyone can say we are free is beyond delusional. It's like thanking your plantation Master for giving you a job. It just doesn't make sense. The Sons of Liberty would have been disgusted with us.
We aren’t free we have the illusion of freedom
You should add that 10+ years in prison is cruel and unusual punishment and should be considered treason by itself on whoever imposed that law on us.
Also the fine is purposeful to cause people to become destitute and purposefully broke which still amounts to a cruel and unusual punishment.
Also, sending people to prison for not complying with their demands is an easy way for the Judicial system to garner some very serious enemies.
These are facts, it is literally based in our Constitution but they don’t apply Constitutional standards when they violate the law to impose on people.
They purposely ignore the Constitutional laws they are supposed to reference against their own Court dockets and that is the problem I am trying to bring awareness of.
We haven't operated under the constitution since the act of 1871.
Only free because they tell us so...
theyre meant to be because theyre scared of us
Steve Dettelbach, head of the BATF, has never personally owned and has never been issued a firearm. He considers himself an expert on firearms. He is anything but an expert based upon his statements. His actual expertise: Civil rights lawyer.
To be fair....I'm sure where he works has gun ranges and dept owned guns. Don't have to have one in your home to be trained and familiar.
That's funny, I thought the 2nd Amendment said "...the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." My bad.
They seemed so happy that they could infringe on peoples rights for life. Maybe they should read the book three felonies a day before they start getting so excited, they aren't the law abiding citizens they think they are, they just haven't gotten caught yet.
1) a well regulated militia 2) being necessary for the security of a free State. Missed some big qualifiers there. The 2A isn’t 1) whatever guns you want 2) for your security.
@@boombox05learn to make a point.
@@JacobWilliams-vo6qy learn to read
@@boombox05 The hell it doesn't. John Adams was asked by a merchant whether he could put cannon on his ships to fight off pirates. Adams' reply was basically, "If you feel you need cannon on your ships, hell yes, put cannon on them."
Another way to get in trouble worth mentioning is going onto the property of a federal post office while carrying. It's a felony.
@@mister_walter_sobchakAnd we know that envelope has to pay for the assault...
I can tell you ,you don't have to do anything to be arrested because they can or will make up any law to arrest you ,if they wish.
It has become the land of "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime."
I know a man who was charged with murder, after the disappearance of two girls who in fact died an accidental death of their own making.
Never Register anything, assemble your own Defense Tools from parts Kits, learn some milling on the way. Print your own PETG, Ceramic and CFK accesories.
Dont "sell" ammo, "sit next to" your friend while they reload "by themself"
the lack of due process for protective orders being able to strip your constitutional rights is absolutely outrageous. Also having suppressors are considered obligatory in many countries that are far more restrictive than the US as a courteous gesture to your neighbors as well as for your own hearing protection, it blows my mind that what is essentially a gun muffler is a restricted item.
Have you ever had a protective order against another person? It involves going to court and providing proof they are a danger to you. That's due process. I've had a stalker and was happy to hear their unstable a$5 couldn't legally aquire a gun.
People don't have protective orders issued against them without reason. If someone acts irrationally or threatens others, they shouldn't be allowed to carry a gun.
@@Newt94 I think it's a tricky issue, but the problem is that in a lot of states, protective orders are issued pretty much automatically, especially if the claimant is a woman and the alleged aggressor is a man. The standard is "preponderance of evidence", not "beyond reasonable doubt", and they are always itchy with that "trigger finger" to put the order in place because from their perspective, the risks of getting it wrong with a false negative (order was needed but not issued) are much worse than getting it wrong with a false positive (order was issued but not needed).
This video is very important. Every first gun owner should watch this video and be aware of one's state's law on firearms, even the small details. Thank you!
Know them, then ignore them.
This video is very important and every gun owner should watch, that's for certain. Every gun owner should watch this and understand what a Fudd is, someone who defends the right to keep their bolt-action hunting rifle but, otherwise, doesn't give a rat's-tail about the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment's protection of the right to keep and bear arms.
how about enacting FEDERAL GUN LAWS - how many more innocent folks have to die because every yahoo is 'carrying a firearm' (second amendment says REGULATED MILITIA - not everyone each to his/her own - with guns aplenty...the gun lobby is twisting the constitution for their own sick purposes - grow up.
This video gets barrel length wrong every time. Sixteen inches is an ecceptable rifle length. The change comes when the barrel is less than sixteen inches
I’d rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6. This philosophy has saved my ass more than once . Always look to deescalate , especially when carrying a gun , this has also saved me . Lastly don’t start any won’t be any , also has saved me . If you think you’re a tough guy cause you carry a gun maybe you shouldn’t.
If people really took being an American seriously they would not comply with any gun control laws whatsoever. When you understand how and why this nation was founded, it is rediculous that so many just drop to their knee's. I hope more people wake up and stop complying. There are millions of us. Dont forget that.
You nailed it.
There has always been reasonable restrictions allowed. From the founding forward. Its not about bending knee and the inference is insulting,.
, you're very wrong.
Not to out myself for anything but, I don’t know what gun laws are, I don’t follow them anyway
@@MrJSchiedelthe nation was founded by rebels fighting their government, they hated 3 things, Taxes, the King, and the government trying to take their guns
Compliance is Participation. These laws are unjust and ridiculous, meaning if you comply, you’re unjust and ridiculous yourself.
-Me, Nov 2023
Quoting yourself is the most cringe shit Ive ever seen
An AR Pistol is a barrel length less than 16 inches not "16 inches or less", which is what you said.
Yeah, but you won't find many (if any) at 16" exactly. They're always made a fraction over for the obvious reason.
@@kennykash6089 I noticed a few times that 16”or less was stated as illegal. I think the point is that 16” is legal. Less than 16” is illegal.
@@kennykash6089 the point is that 16” barrels are legal and less than 16” are illegal, this guy keep saying that 16” or less are illegal and that’s
Incorrect and misleading
Fine line between a defensive display and brandish. Saved me once, felt dumb doing it, still placing my gun on my seat stopped a bad situation.
I agree. What is maddening is that in any fact situation where a “fine line” exists between a lawful / unlawful action, you can pretty much depend on some Democrat, Soros bought-and-paid-for, eager beaver prosecutor to opt to go for a full bore prosecution. They will ALWAYS go with the “interpretation” that is least advantageous for the hapless citizen. Also, their obedient lap dogs in the MSM will always broadcast the Leftist narrative (lie) to the public to paint you in the worst light possible and contaminate any potential jury pool of your “peers.”
We need to have firearm education in schools
@frugalfamilyliving4266any idea the rifle the kids are using
We used to. Thank libs for taking that away.
They change all the laws every 6 months. So it wouldn’t matter.
@@_Delta_P_ I said gun education not gun law education. They are very different things
And gun laws are unconstitutional so..
Unfortunately I lost all my freaking guns in a boating accident!!! And with inflation can’t get anymore! So I don’t have to worry about any of these.
Prohibited persons should not be on the streets. If they are too dangerous to sell a gun to, they are too dangerous to be out of prison.
Why do we need all of these rules???????????????? What part of "...shall not be infringed..." confuses our government???
Guess who isnt worried about these "laws"?
Me😂
Blapeepo
criminals
@@heroinmom153 and why wouldn’t we be worried about these laws..
The thugs n blue
As a friend of mine once said nobody should see that thing before they hear it sing
The bump stock debacle was Trump taking lousy advice from Wayne LaPierre assuming he represented gun owners! I have ceased contributing to NRA until Wayne steps down!
Correct. Trump is a businessman and entertainer, NOT a "gun guy". So yes, he took bad advice on something he had little knowledge of and made a huge mistake. However, it was a mistake, and not part of a larger PLAN of hard-core gun control like Joe Biden has pushed for.
Imagine saying you're a pro 2A advocate, then explain how you submitted to the a f t and turned in your bumpstock. Yes, my lord, I shall bend my knee to your tyranny.
As long as you don't intend to commit crimes with a gun it should be perfectly legal to carry it. Just saying that the gun in ,and of itself shouldn't be a crime, committing a crime with a gun should be the illegal part.
What if they make it illegal to own or obtain or carry said gun? Now your argument is invalid because simply owning the gun is committing a crime. You're bound to either become an unarmed boot licking law abiding citizen, or you're going to become a criminal by simply owning a firearm. Pick your poison.
LOL
The problem is they use
pre-crime laws involving our gun rights out of concern for others to impose on us.
Let me give you some examples:
-If you end up on probation for something minor you can’t own anything they say you can’t and they expect you to “transfer” or “sell” said property.
-Any law they can impose on us even if we have absolutely no malicious intent whatsoever to misuse our property(guns), it’s all a control tactic is all it is based on mob rule by compliance squads that will kill you if you don’t comply.
That is how I view much of these problems.
They expect you to give up your right to self-defense if they demand you do even if your life could be at stake if you gave up your guns and they don’t care if you die because of them.
That’s the problem.
give non violent convictions their 2nd back after their sentence has been served.
If they don't regain their rights, then how is their debt paid? How can they be considered free from discrimination? How can they ever feel fully accepted as a free American citizen? Why should they have any less of a right to protect themselves or their family? Why shouldn't they have a voice in the voting process?
Living in Canada should be on there
Haha. So true.
LESS THAN sixteen inches, NOT sixteen inches or less. Sixteen inches or more is a rifle.
What changed on the Bump stock? Mandalay Bay.
Make sure the statement about AR-15 pistols is "LESS THAN 16 inches", not or less.
I’m always a big fan of educating people about the law. A person may not agree with the law but they should at least be aware of it.
9 ways our own government uses to incriminate otherwise law abiding citizens, who’ve conveniently forgotten the definition of infringed.
Got my Utah non resident CCW here in California through Clark many years ago when he held the class at the Costa Mesa gun show. Great guy. 👍🇺🇸
I really enjoyed this video it's a topic a lot of people don't talk about. I'm a jailer and you'll be surprised how often people accidentally come in jail because they didn't know guns and weed don't mix
How long are they in for usually or do you know the sentencing
Protective Orders: I used to live in Maryland and I was not as versed in the laws as I am now. I left my wife and she filed an order of protection out of spite and the judge even said he didn't feel I was a danger but he was going to "err on the side of caution." Two days later a Maryland state police officer showed up at my front door and told me I had to relinquish my firearms. I owed two pistols at the time and without warrant they searched my home and confiscated my firearms. I did not receive a receipt or any type of notification from them that said they were taking my weapons. I never got those weapons back. Know your rights and the laws and you can avoid illegal seizure like this.
SBR rule is especially important if you live in a place like Kansas City which has the Missouri/Kansas border splitting it down the middle. Have to be careful where you drive and shoot.
I live here and when I got my suppressor which doesn't follow the same rules as sbrs. They told me of a guy who broke up with his gf and he went across state lines with both and she called the ATF. He's a felon and serving like 10 years bc he didn't tell them of the sbr.
So the atf are making good people into felons while doing nothing to stop real criminal threats
@@quintonhays371
That’s why it’s important to get petitions and flyers of said petitions to end these illegal infringements of our Rights.
What they are doing to our gun rights is illegal. The Constitution forbids these Unconstitutional rules from being enforced, the Constitution is for the Courts to look at to make sure they are not violating any Constitutional laws or the Bill of Rights.
They are purposely avoiding using Constitutional references in Court because these Federal Judges know they will lose.
I say this because Constitution.US explains that the Constitution is there to tell them what they are allowed to do and what is not allowed.
No reason to ever go into KCK 😂
4:00 The part they left out about the Bumpstocks is that Trump banned them after the Mandalay Bay Mass Shooting. It wasn't suddenly, all sensible Gun Owners probably saw it coming after the Media started touting that the Shooter used Weapons fitted with Bumpstocks. This isn't me saying I support Trumps decision whatsoever, Trump did a good many things that left a sour taste for me while he was in Office regarding Firearms, but the way they sort of ducked out of what actually happened with Bumpstocks seemed somewhat short sighted to me.
Who knew that "shall not be infringed" could be so difficult for government to understand?
And from watching this video gun owners as well. So long as the attitude exists that you can deny rights to a person forever because you think they're a bad person based on something they may or may not have done in their past there will always be opportunity for government to find new ways to make prohibited persons. That's what the gca was for, it was gun control and a easy way was create felons then disarm them it ranges from 10-24% of state populations with Florida and Texas being the highest as prohibited persons. With numbers that high if these people were dangerous we'd be war zones.
At least Texas allows non violent felons to have firearms for self defense on their property five years after all time and probation is done. Feds can still charge them but state can't.
Great vid as usual. As gun carriers--and I hope all day, every day, 24/7--we've got to be a bit smarter than the average bear. Don't go out drinking even one drink while armed. Get a water. Drink at home and get as blitzed as you want. Don't mix rec pot with carrying. Don't get into a sit where you get a protective order thrown on you: if it's falling apart, let the other person go their way. Don't go to seedy parts of town (what's there, anyway!?!). Don't speed on the highway. Don't run stop signs. Don't fall prey to road rage--Jeepers, let the other guy get ahead and be the first one at the next red light! Don't show a firearm to try to de-escalate. Keep 'em away from kiddos. Be responsible and be an adult. I've used these rules every day since 1979 and it has worked for me so far. The gun, like the fire extinguisher, is a tool. We don't pull out our fire extinguishers willy-nilly just to show them off.
Clearly, you didn't grow up with a firefighter.
I would add a few things: don't buy anything that might attract thieves and home invaders. For the same reason, keep you property looking dilapidated (better yet, don't own property, rent a small apartment instead). Ride a bus. Don't wear new or nice clothes. Never visit a restaurant, just buy groceries, lest somebody thinks you have extra money to steal. Don't get a well-paying job, because that money will attract robbers/thieves. Don't date women, they are the ones with protective orders. Always run away from conflicts, because standing up for yourself leads to "escalation". Yep, just be a compliant little mouse/pushover/doormat, and let everyone else run your life. 😂😂
One exception: you can absolutely, positively get angry over a UA-cam comment. It's quite safe. Just don't express it as a threatening reply, or I might report you and you might get in trouble.
Do you see what I'm getting at, wise one? While there is some wisdom in your words, some things you simply can't avoid or evade in this life. Your philosophy is that of complete compliance with the government. Well, might as well give up that gun, you'll never use it even if you have to, and it's not what the Second Amendment was for.
@@user-io2ym6gm8z Now you're just being silly. The advice he gave is beneficial to most and will help keep people out of trouble. However this is social media and even a post expressing how beautiful and sunny the day is, will be met by someone with some silly negative commentary about it.
@@charlesdonahue3667 I'm not being silly. I'm being sarcastic. I'm highlighting what his way of thinking amounts to. "A firearm is a government-licensed toy that I'm lucky to hold in my hand". Instead of, you know, CONSTITUTIONAL right. And it's always hard to deal with partial-truth comments. But I think I said "there is some wisdom in your words", a point that you missed, obviously. I'm only really against "don't get into a sit where you get a protective order" and "don't show firearm to de-escalate". The first one is dumb and completely unconstitutional, a random angry chick should be able to take away your rights, and the second one is just plain dumb. In the first one, "don't get into a sit" advice tells you not get into something you have no control over getting into. With the other one, What am I going to wait until he actually attacks me so that I'm forced to kill him in self-defense? And then have to go through the legal and financial nightmare of proving my innocence? Instead of simply showing the gun as a warning and getting him to back off?
@@user-io2ym6gm8z Anyone reading your commentary understood it was sarcasm, they also understood it was silly. Someone posted a video offering practical advice on how to avoid legal trouble relative to EDC and you viewed it as an opportunity to joke. The First Amendment protects your right to do so. Your decision to hyperbolize the video's message to make a rant about constitutionality reveals your temperament. It's up to readers to decide if they choose to be influenced by such commentary in matters concerning their legal rights and safety.
Explain to me how an alcoholic can have a 50 cal. but a person who is perscribed medical cannabis can't even have a .22lr pistol. Stoners have rights too. Hell, Oxycodone blows marijuana out of the water and that is fine to have and own guns.
I'm anti marijuana. But a stoner should 100% be able to own any gun they'd like.
Freedom! Should not matter what one chooses to put in their body…. Shall not be infringed!
Yeah, when push comes to shove, I'm just gonna say, "The form said, 'are you an illegal user of marijuana'"
Nope, I bought by bud legally, from a dispensary, taxed and everything.
I'll let the cards fall where they do. It's not like they don't have a database for both, if they really cared about people not having both, they would just prohibit you with red flags by cross referencing the two. But they don't want that, they want to be able to disarm you, period, but they can't do that without a reason, so they have it the way it is now. You can buy both, legally, but can't have both legally. Stupid.
edit: this will effectively turn you into a felon and thus unable to have a firearm, ever. Thats their plan. They can't call it an honest score if there is no net, that's why they leave the net.
Freedom is a myth.
Its not 16 inches or shorter. Its under 16 inches. You should know this..
He had the correct information on the screen. Its a raw video, misspeaks are going to happen occasionally. Stop being that person.
@jimyeats you're under the assumption I watched the screen while listening. So your idea of occasionally happens to be repeatedly in one video...yeah, don't tell me what I should and shouldn't do.
@@benlastname6667 Yes, I am, because its a video, and because you came and felt the need to type a comment out.
@@jimyeats you also felt the need to type yours. You live in a glass house. Kick rocks.
@@benlastname6667 My point noting your comment is that you would had to have been looking at your screen, thus seeing the fact that they are putting information and corrections on the screen.
All that was heard here was how the gov wants you the law abiding firearm owner jailed. While nothing happens to the criminal ...it's only and always about taking constitutional rights away
This is why you need great lawyers who like suing the establishment.
All these laws do is make honest people criminals. How did this happen?
You should mention that only vertical foregrips are illegal on AR pistols. Angled foregrips will not make you a felon if you put one on an AR pistol.
This is for owners using a brace who have not paid a tax stamp for a SBR.
Fun fact: We have one of the most restrictive weapon laws in the world here in Germany. However, foregrips on ARs are legal for everyone and if you have a hunting license, you can go to the store and buy as many suppressors as you want without any issue. 😅
There should be legal repercussions for establishments that disarm their patrons and don’t provide for their security. If they can sue a manufacturer of the firearm then this seems like a very small logical step in comparison
You technically could sue them, it just hasn't been done before. You would have a case technically, you are being disarmed, thus the establishment is directly liable for anything that happens to you if they don't have security to protect you. But you would have to probably have such an event occur for a court to listen, because you would clearly have standing then. Otherwise, most courts won't listen to hypotheticals, but the law as written states that standing is gained either a) by an event occurring, or b) by the potential of an event occurring to you. Such as a law being passed, like the Trans laws in Tennessee for example. The laws would make being Trans in public illegal, so a) would effect anyone that is arrested for breaking the new law, but b) applies to all Trans people in the state, because there is the "potential" for them to be arrested.
Try to file a lawsuit, see what happens, I would honestly be very interested to see, because I do honestly agree with you.
So protective orders are unconstitutional by the fact of not having due process and we as a community need to fight back against it
Experiencing this situation first hand, I agree 100% law abiding citizen here with no criminal record, just a paranoid crazy ex.
I have always said the GUN FREE zones are the most dangerous place to be. Law abiding citizens, will comply, but what about the criminal? You stand no chance at those places.
I carry into the dmv, I "illegally" concealed for years in cali. I don't abide by unconstitutional laws😊.
Check local laws to a lot of times the sign carries no legal ramifications. Just means you can’t open carry. In my state if you’re caught concealed carrying in a “gun free zone” the most that can be done is you are asked to leave the private property.
Being one of these so called law abiding citizens would mean you follow only the supreme law of the land right. I know how to read and my reading comprehension has been scaled very high on tests, so carry what you want, when you want, how you want. Enough said
people that shouldn't have guns should NOT be out of prison. The 2nd doesn't say only certain people can own firearms.
You might want to clarify exactly who classifies as a prohibited person. Your description was simply someone who cannot buy a gun from an FFL, but it's a little more nuanced. For example, in some states 18- 20-year-olds cannot purchase a handgun from an FFL but they can via private party transaction. They aren't prohibited persons.
The 18-20yr olds not able to purchase handguns just got shutdown by a judge ruling it unconstitutional. Now the ATF will appeal of course as always but they arent going to win due to Bruen. Now NICS will needs to be changed to allow the purchase, but currently they can now legally purchase handguns.
To my understanding, any barrel less than 16" is an SBR, but a true 16" barrel is not within the statutes of an SBR.
Great information, appreciate the time and effort y'all take to keep us informed and knowledgeable.
Not a lawyer, but my understanding of the law is that it's legal to sell ammo you made, but it's not legal to make ammo with the intent to sell. Much like firearms bought with a C&R FFL. Legal to sell them, but not legal to use the C&R to acquire them with the intent to sell.
SBR does not mean "16" or less" It's LESS THAN 16"
Pretty semantic. It's effectively the same thing. 16.0000" on a warm summer day is 15.9998" in January.
Don't make NICS mandatory for private sales. Available, fine. But only way to enforce mandatory NICS is a 100% registry. After registry will come confiscation. Illinois is enacting a sweeping "Assault Weapon" registry and even before law goes into effect a state house rep was talking about legislation to use registry to confiscate those guns.
I had a stalker that was threatening me with violence and setting ambush in parking lots of stores i patron. After two police reports, the third incident happened right in front of my front door of my unit, and the guy came running out of his front door and was not visible to me because he was running behind my truck to get at me. I drew my 9 mm full-size MMP one in the chamber no safety out of a Blackhawk Serpa holster And pointed it at him and he retreated. He called the police and claimed that I drew my firearm and pointed it at him as he was standing in his doorway. So after I was cuffed up and ready to go to jail, I showed the arresting officers the video And I told them that they would’ve mag dumped on this guy and they agreed 100%. They also agreed that I showed self restraint by not squeezing the trigger. USCCA that I was a member of for several years did not answer my collect phone calls, and when they saw the video they did not take my case. The DA dropped the case but I still had to pay for an attorney out-of-pocket. Do not waste your money on USCCA open your own bank account for savings That you can use when you need a real attorney and not these fake fools from USCCA. This happened in Salt Lake City Utah 33rd south and State Street.
dont talk to police. why would you answer the door and talk to police about all this shit? they don't care about you. they want arrests.
@@RoryMartel who answered the door? Is this directed at me? I never answered a door.
@@RoryMartel I was in my truck
@@michaeltaylor7996 next itme don't explain anything to police. they aren't a jury
@@RoryMartel video that spoke all the words I needed. DA never even took the case to court and USCCA didn’t answer any phone calls so I canceled them.. good luck on your vote for Kamala
Supreme Court ruled that bump stocks are not machine guns, also, recently a Federal judge threw out a auto possession case stating that the 1933 ban on them were unconstitutional.
"Shall Not Be Infringed" "We The People" Those 2 alone say enough.
SCOTUS 1876, shall not be infringed by Congress.
The 2A does not give you gun rights,
It prevents Congress from making laws
that take away rights you were BORN with.
So after watching this video it occurs to me a lot of folks in Utah probably have insurance based self defense programs. If you defend yourself and in the process decide to plea out your insurance based protection ends. Check it out “he ain’t lyin” So a shameless plug checkout AOR or Attorneys for Freedom because if you have any of the issues talked about here they WILL take the case and defend you. They are criminal defense attorneys and offer self defense coverage for you and your family. “Not a paid affiliate or spokes person for Attorneys on Retainer” I’m not you just don’t want to find out you are not covered when you thought you were.
You can sell to someone out of state if a rifle/shotgun and let them leave with it. You can also sell a handgun to someone out of state but they can't take it as it has to be shipped to their home state to an FFL.
Eh, maybe you should do some more research on the rifle/shotgun situation. The GCA pretty much says Licensees (FFLs) at their premises may sell/transfer long guns to out of state residents, non-licensees must transfer them through a licensee. Each sate also has their specifics on importing/transferring firearms to their residents. USCCA, and a few others have good articles on it.
@@brianhess226 Sorry, I should have been clearer. I am speaking as a Type 07 Class 02 FFL/SOT here in NC.
Bump stock ban was a knee jerk reaction after the Vegas concert.
My thing with the stock/pistol grip is like why would you not want people owning those to potentially install an attachment to have more accurate shots?😂 like wouldn’t you want people to be more accurate and Arguably safer shooters? Crazy concept right
In My Humble Opinion,
The problem with your question is that they do NOT want an armed population, they want a Dis/Un-Armed population that they can CONTROL !!
An armed population can fight back against their TYRANNY, whereas a Dis/Un-Armed population must submit to their TYRANNY, or face the RETRIBUTION of the MARXIST-SOCIALIST REGIME !!
The preceding statements are MY OPINIONS, and as such, I realize and understand that it is within the realm of possibility that your opinions might conceivably be different from MY OPINIONS, no matter how implausible and unlikely that scenario would actually be, it does remain to be a slight possibility !!
you answered your question. it makes you more accurate. they don't want you being accurate. they want you to be defenseless
Silly rules and laws….. I’d love to hear the rationale for these ridiculous laws!
Jim, thanks for making this video.
We all need to be reminded that knowledge is power and that it is our responsibility.
Push 2 pins and separate the upper from the lower, and you no longer have an SBR in your position.
No matter if it is a pistol brace, or just a rifle lower. Anything other than a registered SBR lower. If you travel with it separate it. Now you are only carrying parts..
The lower is legally always an SBR once registered. Doesn't matter what upper (even no upper) you put on
Constructive possession. If you have a short-barreled upper you better have first built or bought a pistol lower.
@@evanwells6284
Do you know what doesn’t make sense about the ATF’s dumb law about SBR’s? If you register a lower as an SBR it still doesn’t make it an SBR but they have it as such if you registered it.
You could have a SBR lower for the purpose of building a perfectly legal ar platform pistol which is not considered a SBR by the ATF’s definition.
You could even categorize gun parts by category and that doesn’t mean you have any intent to make an SBR, but they still think they have the power to manufacture people into criminals for intent based on parts alone even if you wanted to build an ar platform pistol not a SBR.
You see the flaws in these dumb laws are what I call obvious infringements for example you could have stocks for the sole purpose of building 16” rifles in a pile of parts in one category and ar platform pistol parts in another categorized pile, so do they just get to misconstrue criminal charges based on their own decision of parts and what they think a person wants to use it for?
I call complete bs on ATF’s logic on this one.
@@dalepres1
Constructive possession is bs. Intent to manufacture what they deem as illegal is more what they define constructive possession as.
@@evanwells6284 Do not register it ….
This is why government shouldn't have so much control. The entire sections regarding law just had me shaking my head. How can old-kroons issue these laws that make no sense yet hide behind fully armed military-like security.
Not a single one of these gun laws saved any lives.
Except for that one time
One mistake.. I have a California drivers misc , with my Nevada address ,which is where I live... I am a resident of Nevada, my California drivers lisc. says so... I have bought a gun with it, I was passed by the Nevada dept of public safety and I was told by a ATF agent at a gun show in Reno years ago, when I handed him my actual drivers lisc to answer my question, he said as long as it had an actual street address on it and not a P.O. Box ,I could buy a gun in Nevada... The ATF has the definition of resident on its website..
How do you avoid being licensed in NV?
The protective order thing is unconstitutional, so clearly that those laws can't be enforced without committing the worst crime in this country, violating the constitutional protected rights on a citizen. All law enforcement and judges are supposed to lose their qualified immunity because violating the constitutional rights of citizens is not qualifying for immunity and they must be charged!
All lawyers need to be pushing hard to get all law enforcement and judges prosecuted when they clearly violate citizens constitutional rights. Ignorance to the law is not a valid defence. And the Constitution is the highest law in this country.
I had a guy at work put a forward grip on a AR Pistol and I explained to him that if he didn't remove it he might be going to jail! He was going for the cool factor not knowing any Class III laws or how to google!
Less thab 16in.... notb16in or less, tes theres a differen.16in is fine, 15.9in is where problems start
The protective order.... turns u into a prohibited person, not just can't carry but u cant own.
Lots of little yet important mistakes in this video
Yeah, I said that a few times in the video incorrectly. I put it in text to correct it, but felt dumb that I kept saying that.
This happened to me in Pennsylvania 😂. Courts dropped the charges thanks to the lawyer I had thanks to having a clean record. I got hit with disorderly conduct and aggravated assault in a 4v1 situation with my first gun. When I look back I’m glad it played out how it did because after I started paying attention to laws. I’m not a fan of sitting in a small room with a bunch of funky dudes 24/7. No fresh air 🥶
Abolish the AFT
Pretty cool seeing the acknowledgement of the less biased parts of politics behind these things. Good content.
The amount of incorrect info in this vid is amazing.
As I said, Utahans deserve a better class of gun-rights advocates than these bozos.
@@dalepres1we do what we want here
Such as....
AR with a barrel 16” or less is an SBR now? 🤔 16” is legal along with any pin & welded muzzle device creating a 16” overall barrel length (13.7-14.5 depending on muzzle device length)!
You keep saying 16" or shorter for an SBR. It's only on rifles with barrels shorter than 16". You can have a barrel that is 16" and a stock on it and you will only have a rifle, not a Short Barreled Rifle. And a vertical grip also. But just anything with a barrel shorter than 16" cannot have a stock or a vertical grip without an SBR tax stamp.
They're Fudds. Obey beyond the law. Surrender more rights than otherwise forced. Next the might be asking to just turn in those nasty fully semi-automatic weapons.
I am pretty sure that illegal/Unconstitutional law was struck down in Court.
If you've got a barrel that's exactly 16 inches, good chances are you've got a barrel that's less than 16 inches.
@@brainmind4070umm, no. The most popular barrel length for the most popular rifle (AR-15) is 16".
@@JaredaSohn And have you measured those "16 inch" barrels? How long are they to the thousandths place? I don't know how the law is written, but if it doesn't specify a tolerance and temperature under which the measurement is to be taken, you're talking about non-compliance in certain conditions.
For those new to this… SBR is a rifle under 16”, not 16” or less as he states in the video.
Imagine complying with this anti American government.
The problem is there are so many of them who really don’t understand that they are persecuting their own friends, family and partners with these illegal and Unconstitutional laws. These are my beliefs.
The other fact is these are factions of people using force against individual people who don’t comply even if they have done nothing criminal with their own property. That is where the problem lies.
FYI Bump Stocks are legal as of June 2024.
I would oppose private background checks because them being optional is only one step away from them being mandatory.
Absolutely true. Why don't people understand that, that is the way they get to sneak in more restriction.
Constitutional carry. We are all entitled to self defense by virtue of citizenship and not being criminals.
And we should absolutely be allowed any type of firearm.
Ignorance is no excuse they say,but when the laws are changed like a pair of panties there will be accidental violations..by mostly law abiding citizens that doesn't even have a background to check.without reasonable doubt supposed to mean something
Shall not be infringed! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 ATF is unconditional!
Finally a great analysis with some humor injected that helps keeps viewers interested and paying attention to how easy it is to end up in prison regarding weapons.
Jim, you start off saying that Utah is the most permissive state for gun laws, yet not 30 seconds later we find out that brandishing is a misdemeanor there. Here in New Hampshire, brandishing isn't even illegal.
Well I would expect that to be so…if your motto is “live free or die”…I’d totally expect that
Utah is not the most permissive state! States with constitutional carry are more permissive than Utah! So much wrong info in this video!
Being a bootlicker isn't being "honest".
Don't follow their tyrannical laws they will come after you eventually. Don't give them an inch.
1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.
6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour
Romans 13:1-7 KJV
Seek Jesus with everything you have while you can. Love Him more than guns.
In Texas now, there are a lot of people who carry permitless, who *do not* understand this at all, and they will get in trouble.
it's not a crime if the government never finds out.
Thanks for the information. Learning the laws and your rights is an essential part of being responsibly armed.