Hello friends. Please note the following corrections to the above video: 1) Around 11:40, the slide reads حوضهم rather than خوضهم as it should. 2) From 8:31, an incorrect portion of text exists in the slide before being rectified at 8:41. These will be minor distractions to most viewers, if noticed at all, but since I know there are some who are looking for anything to criticize, I wanted to acknowledge these upfront. I see no need to take down and re-post the video; so I just acknowledge them here. Thank you for understanding. DB
Hello Dr.. have you also taken account that the main preservation of the Quran is via memorization throught 7 dialects. So the manuscripts is more or less like memorization note rather than a final product. Just want to know what your opinion on this. Scribers error do occurs sometimes and you even mentioned without having another copy of the manuscript it is difficult to assess the errors.
@@Md.Kamarussalihin Thank you for honoring me with this question. The answer is that I am open to considering all possibilities here, and always. I do not at the moment find the prospect of a text such as this, written on parchment, and clearly having been bound into a muṣḥaf, as being merely a memorization note with carelessness about the details such as alternate words, tenses, or other issues, to be intellectually satisfying. We might imagine such a thing, but this looks to me like something that was prepared for circulation, not as memorization notes. And further, if one wished to have a memorization note, then we might expect that what is written on the page would be very precise, so as to aide in precise and correct memorization. It does not, therefore, make sense to me that this would be a good explanation for what we see on this page. I do, however, remain ready to consider new information and happy for thoughtful discussion. Best to you, and I am thankful you are here. DB
For better discussion, here is a list of the details from Daniel Brubaker's video. Slide 1: MS.474.2003 (8r):"signs for you (plural) if you (plural) believe" versus Hafs Q6:99: "signs for a people who believe" Slide 2 - inserted word: MS.474.2003 (8r): bihi follows first occurrence of "fa-akhrajna," but inserted after second "fa-akhrajna." [unclear whether 3:43 slide of Hafs is pointing to the first or second occurrence of "from it" as we can see another occurrence to the left of the green boxed Arabic text. Brubaker or someone needs to explain this better.] Slide 3 -missing script: MS.474.2003 (8r): does not contain third person singular [translation and significance needed] Hafs: contains third person singular "their fruit, when they bear" Slide 4 - erasure: MS.474.2003 (8r): 'alif erased changing "allah" to "lillahi" conforms to Hafs reading "to Allah." Allah as object (accusative form) not found anywhere in Quran. Slide 5 different word: MS.474.2003 (8r): yashrikun is written first. Then second scribe changes text but does not erase the extra letters. Hafs: yashrifun?? [unclear what word is spoken by Brubaker. Writing all Arabic terms used would have been better.] Slide 6 : Hafs has one more tooth (short upwards stroke) than MS.474.2003 (8r) [discussion requested] Slide 7 - Q6:106: MS.474.2003 (8r): present continuous active voice - "that which he is revealing" Hafs: present perfect passive voice - "that which has been revealed to you" Slide 8 - Q6:107: MS.474.2003 (8r): ashrakna - "Had Allah willed they would not have ascribed partners to Us" Hafs: "Had Allah willed they would not have been polytheists." Slide 9 - q6:107: MS.474.2003 (8r): "a watcher over him/it ['alayhi]" Hafs: "We have not appointed you a watcher over them ['alayhim]." Slide 10 - q6:108: MS.474.2003 (8r): 'alif Hafs: no 'alif Slide 11 - changes: MS.474.2003 (8r): Q6:105 - 'alif inserted; Q6:106 - erasure, possibly a "waw" Slide 12 - alternative word: MS.474.2003 (8r): q6:110 - "plunged" as in Q6:91 Hafs: Q6:110 - "insolence"
@@maxmudxareed1345 Tom Holland is a firm historicist. He believes muhammad existed. The scholarships I allude to say muhammad most likely never existed.
@Adam Musthafa That's a strawman argument. It's very old an has been refuted many times. Christians dont claim 1+1+1=1. You obviously don't understand what christians believe. In order for your logic or your equation to equivocate, there would have to be a time in which God existed as 3 separate Gods and then fused himself into 1 God. Christians don't believe God was ever separated, nor do christians worship Jesus, The holy spirit, and the Father as 3 separate Gods. Rather, Christians believe God has always existed as ONE triune being. Therefore the more accurate equation would be , 1P+1P+1P= 1G Or in its simplest form, 3P= 1G Where P represents Personhood, and G represents Deity or Godliness
@Adam Musthafa Arab paganism= Al-lah has 3 daughters and 1 black stone and 1 Kabbah Islam paganism= Al-lah (moon god) has 1 black stone and 1 Kabbah You are pagan as well, you just don't accept those 3 daughters
@@iranianskeptic Funny he accused Christians having 3 daughters as one God when it was from his own religion that admitted these things taking place. Typical lying abdool 😂
@Harris Christianity never said 1+1+1 = 1 It's you muslim who say so and question us, "How?" So, don't question us for your own stupidity! Christian concept of the Trinity is 1x1x1 = 1 if I were to follow the muslim understanding of the Trinity.
@@yenomrofuoy5444 But abduls can't understand multiplication and even addition beyond four is too difficult for them, you know, 1400 years of inbreeding takes its toll.
When i was a child.. My Father, Mother, Teacher, basically everyone always told me "the Qur'an is preserved by Allah himself, it never changed even by a single letter and this is a miracle." I'm an adult now, have access to the internet, and it is not so much of a miracle.
@Adam Musthafa At least in your video, some Muslim aknowlegde that there are many difference Quran variants/manuscripts... Conclusion: the miracle of preservation that was used to be claim is nothing. It was proven that the Quran manuscripts are human made.
@Adam Musthafa So you think there are just 7 different Qurans, and that the skeletal text is always the same. This is proven not to be true, and Muslims scholars have now openly acknowledged it. There are 37(!) Qurans and they differ in consonants (razm). Just watch these videos (and others on this channel) to start: ua-cam.com/video/IM3P2id3Trw/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/ev1SXgwTxg4/v-deo.html And here is a video and channel that will introduce you to all of the problems with the traditional history of Islam from the Hadith and Sirat. Did you know the terms Muhammad, Mecca, Islam and Muslim are nowhere to be found before the year 685AD (Mecca not even before 740!)? This, along with lots of other evidence, makes the idea that the Arab conquerors were Muslims simply impossible: ua-cam.com/video/zyHQ2JeEj6U/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/Rl25urZTWYA/v-deo.html The problems with the Quranic page in this video should definitely concern you as well. According to Islamic tradition, the Quran was compiled by Uthman in the 650's while burning all others, so all Qurans after that should be perfect copies. What we see is that all Quranic manuscripts from the 8th century are different from today's Quran, and each other!
@Adam Musthafa Dr. Qadhi's admission that "the standard narrative... has holes," sounded pretty current to me. Are you suggesting that his furtive video exchange with Hijab was recorded ten years ago, and that in the time since then he figured it all out so that it is now "nothing new"?
Wrong, because even if different versions of the Qur’ân, like those of Ḥafṣ and Warsh, it wasn't that hard for me to figure out which was the correct version of the Qur’ân, with a careful reading of the Verses, by God's Grace.
I remember this idiom: "So if you see one mouse in your home, chances are good that there are many others"...Can you imagine, if you find 11 edited text in one page only, how many edited text you will find in the whole book...
@NYC125street "So what"?? So it hasn't been perfectly preserved "down to the single letter" as has been claimed repeatedly. So every Muslim whose faith rests on this false claim as proof of Allah's sovereignty has had his foundation stripped away. And this doesn't even address variants in which one person says, "Howdy y'all" and the other says "Your money or your life."
Angelika Neuwirth is the western world's leading Scholar concerning the Qur’an & knows more about this subject than this comparative amateur Brubaker. She has the world's largest collection of ancient Qur'an manuscripts (microfiche /photos etc ) & she studied under the old German Orientalists who were world renowned. Angelika inherited 'the lost archive' of Germany's vast collection of ancient Qur'ans from all over the Islamic world after it was hidden by Anton Spitaler (an interesting event in itself). In her talk (link below), she says: "To this very day, the Qur'an is taught as an orally performed text, whose phonetic realisation is cherished as an aesthetically sophisticated art. The Oral transmission of the Qur'an is highly esteemed even considered superior to the written text. Thus the printed Cairo edition of the Qur'an most frequently used today is based not on manuscripts but on oral tradition." ua-cam.com/video/qHCeYSvazY4/v-deo.html She leads the Quranic Arabic Corpus project which has the most detailed information in English about the Qur’an in one place - www.corpus.quran.com So Muslims are absolutely right when they say that the Qur'an (the oral/memorised Recitation in all qira'at) is 100% the SAME as it was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him. This was passed down throughout the generations from 'heart to heart - memory to memory' by millions of Huffaz (urdu plural of singular Hafiz) UNCHANGED! NOT A SINGLE LETTER CHANGE IN ANY OF THE RECITATIONS! The written Qur'an is called the Mus'haf. This is SECONDARY (a backup) to the oral/memorised Qur'an to help ppl to read. Mus'haf can have differences due to: Scripts - rasm / orthography. The Qira'ah that is being written. Scribal mistakes. Brubaker, being a Christian Missionary, loves to mislead /distract people away from the facts that the Qur’an, as it is RECITED ANYWHERE IN THE World is the same Qur'an that was taught by the Prophet peace be upon him to his Companions.
Very good analysis Dr Brubaker. I am not fussed about such variants in manuscripts as Quran is primarily based on the tradition of continued recitations for generations base on memorizing. Scribes made several mistakes which is accepted by greatest Muslim manuscript analysts already. The pivotal issue would be to see whether the meanings changed which I have noticed in variant recitation based manuscripts as well. Thank you for your effort.
M J Allah says in Quran clearly that he did allow some verses to be forgotten to be replaced by better verses. So I don’t consider that to have had affected the planning of Allah with regard to the ultimate preservation intended
What happened to the claim that the Quran is perfectly preserved word for word from the beginning. Oh, sorry, I forget, when was the "first" Quran readily available and considered as the standard text.
@@simkwakia (1). The Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad pbuh on piecemeal basis over 23 years. During each revelation, the prophet would recite to companions who recite, memorize and practice the message (many wrote them down on piecemeal basis). This continued until the whole Quran was revealed. Note: The recitation was memorized and preserved over those 23 years. (2) Those writing were collected by first Khalifa Abu Bakar and kept. (3) The whole Quran revealed was put into a book (5 copies) by third Khalifah Othman from the memorisation of the companions together with those writings which were kept. Note : Some of these copies are still available and millions are memorizer of Quran today. (4) The Quran printed and read therefrom until today all over the world has the same text of that third Khalifah's.
THE STANDARD NARRATIVE HAVE HOLES IN IT, so says our Islamic scholar Dr Yasir Qadhi. Why? Because it cannot handle textual criticism, historical criticism, and source criticism.
6:7 Al-An'aam وَلَوْ نَزَّلْنَا عَلَيْكَ كِتَابًا فِي قِرْطَاسٍ فَلَمَسُوهُ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ لَقَالَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا إِنْ هَٰذَا إِلَّا سِحْرٌ مُبِينٌ And even if We had sent down unto you (O Muhammad SAW) a Message written on paper so that they could touch it with their hands, the disbelievers would have said: "This is nothing but obvious magic!"
Here is Dr. Jeferson Chagas form Brazil. Congratulations on your researches on variants in the Qur'an. I am preparing a course for Portuguese-speaking Christians about the Science e of the Qur'an, and certainly, your research will be explored in this program. This field of study is sensitive, and you do that without dehumanizing Muslims. Congratulations again.
Thank you, Dr. Chagas. Yes, my purpose is serious inquiry and respectful discussion, and I mean no harm or unkindness to any person; thank you for recognizing that. Best to you. DB
Angelika Neuwirth is the western world's leading Scholar concerning the Qur’an & knows more about this subject than this comparative amateur Brubaker. She has the world's largest collection of ancient Qur'an manuscripts (microfiche /photos etc ) & she studied under the old German Orientalists who were world renowned. Angelika inherited 'the lost archive' of Germany's vast collection of ancient Qur'ans from all over the Islamic world after it was hidden by Anton Spitaler (an interesting event in itself). In her talk (link below), she says: "To this very day, the Qur'an is taught as an orally performed text, whose phonetic realisation is cherished as an aesthetically sophisticated art. The Oral transmission of the Qur'an is highly esteemed even considered superior to the written text. Thus the printed Cairo edition of the Qur'an most frequently used today is based not on manuscripts but on oral tradition." ua-cam.com/video/qHCeYSvazY4/v-deo.html She leads the Quranic Arabic Corpus project which has the most detailed information in English about the Qur’an in one place - www.corpus.quran.com So Muslims are absolutely right when they say that the Qur'an (the oral/memorised Recitation in all qira'at) is 100% the SAME as it was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him. This was passed down throughout the generations from 'heart to heart - memory to memory' by millions of Huffaz (urdu plural of singular Hafiz) UNCHANGED! NOT A SINGLE LETTER CHANGE IN ANY OF THE RECITATIONS! The written Qur'an is called the Mus'haf. This is SECONDARY (a backup) to the oral/memorised Qur'an to help ppl to read. Mus'haf can have differences due to: Scripts - rasm / orthography. The Qira'ah that is being written. Scribal mistakes. Brubaker, being a Christian Missionary, loves to mislead /distract people away from the facts that the Qur’an, as it is RECITED ANYWHERE IN THE World is the same Qur'an that was taught by the Prophet peace be upon him to his Companions.
@@mikhan5191 🙄 Too late for that sonny. Shabir Ally, Yasir Qadhi had all admitted of variations existing in the texts. Also, there are at least 37 variations of the Arabic Quran still existing around now.
@@mikhan5191 The video literally pared down words and marks of ancient Arabic. The evidence is literally right before you. He understands full Arabic so you've got no excuse.
@@hussnain6114 You just insulted Allah because Allah said the Torah and gospel are his words So you admit Allah couldn’t protect the Torah and the gospel
@@worldchanger7197 100 years and full of errors corrections and variations! dannngggg imagine how the first quran was like! bbahahahaha. Share this video!!!
@@variantquran4505 Thanks for your time, did you find any Rasm text referring to Becca? Or that might have been altered to read Mecca? ua-cam.com/video/TIw1OPH6QvM/v-deo.html
It was hand written many times from memory. spelling error’s happen it’s human nature. The bigger issue here as xtians fail to see is that the Quran is not a book. It’s a recital so this can be easily written off. The Quran is totally preserved as the recital
But we all get told over and over the written Arabic Quran is identical around the world. Letter for letter dot for dot. Clearly, it is not. If you can't write it correctly there is no way you can recite it correctly. Ever hear of the game Chinese whispers?
Sir u are right verses 99 is إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُون, but they changed, if u look few words before إِنَّ فِي ذَٰلِكُمْ so the picture of إِن is exactly same, so your are right it is إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُون because here they removed إِن كُنتُمْ and modified تُؤْمِنُون with يؤْمِنُون also they changed بها to بِهِ in كَمَا لَمْ يُؤْمِنُوا بِهِ أَوَّلَ مَرَّةٍ وَنَذَرُهُمْ فِي طُغْيَانِهِمْ يَعْمَهُونَ just before last aya you mentioned at the end of your video. well done and thanks for your work, even i speak Arabic but i am not as accurate as you are, everyone subscribe please, to appreciate his valuable work.
As someone who many years ago studied the Hebrew text of the Jewish scriptures I find this fascinating. This scribe was not having a good day! Your work is much appreciated, just what is needed to understand the nature of the Qur'an today. Thank you for these videos.
I have a serious question. If the Quran is supposed to be the only miracle that Mohamed ever did. How is this possible if he never wrote anything down and it was only compiled after by others? So how could it be a miracle? I’ve heard Muslims claim it was because of how beautifully it was written but Mohamed never even wrote it. So how is this a “miracle” that proves that Mohamed was right? There have been many classic works of literature that far surpass the jumbled nonsensical way that the Quran was mashed together. I’ve seen children who can write more coherent stories. So my question is genuine and not meant to sound mean but how is this book, that he never even wrote, a miracle that proves him to be a prophet?
Actually it was mocked by many well known scholars in the Muslim world like ar-Razzi or ar-Rawandi but since criticizing the Quran can get you killed, this idea of literary excellency has been enforced with threats and violence over the ages, after a while it became like an automated response, a reflex Muslims acquire at a very young age.
Quran is not a miracle at all, even the arabs at the time did not believe it at all, it was after they muslims conquered Mecca that they converted in masses. Here is a link to a video m.ua-cam.com/video/2sIIV3Ld9EE/v-deo.html
Firstly, The prophet PBUH is illiterate. Secondly, it did got written down by his fellow companion. The revelation came within 23 years of his prophethood so not many of the same companion was always there while some were there halfway. Thats why during the Time of Uthman RA every known memorizer, reciter and those who hold a copy were gathered to compiled the textual Quran and after the finish product, the other copies were burned to avoid confusion.
I think Muslims say M received and recited it. Others memorized and eventually write it down and burned all the deviant copies (except this one it now seems) and that the resulting book was so awesome it head to be a miracle. It's not M''s miracle - the words themselves are the miracle and they are an exact copy of the (platonic) one in heaven.
@@hh-hj9fn the original manuscripts are lost, just like the ones of the Quran, the Old Testament have some minor textual differences between the Greek oldest translation, the Death See Scrolls and the Masoretoc text. while in the New Testament words have been changed and phrases and whole passages have been added
This is the first time I hear of this... interesting to see different words... so theperson copying can choose a different word he thinks fits best. Thank you for your work. With social media the truth will reach everyone.
There are readings of the Holy Qur’an, and there is a hadith that explains this, and there are those who memorize all the readings, and this matter is known, and all the readings are from God, and there is a hadith that explains that, as the readings existed even in the time of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace.
So what there are different versions of the Qur’ân, like those of Ḥafṣ and Warsh? It wasn't that hard for me to figure out which was the correct version of the Qur’ân, with a careful reading of the Verses, by God's Grace.
What he did not tell you is that the readings existed in the time of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, and that there is a hadith that explains that the readings are from God Almighty and that there are those who memorize all the readings. Also, the Holy Qur’an is memorized by memorization and not by writing. Now I can obtain a license, Permissibility is that I have a chain of transmission that reaches the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. For example, I memorized it from a sheikh, and this sheikh memorized it from a sheikh. And so on, all the way to the Tabi’i, all the way to the Companion, and all the way to the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace ua-cam.com/video/MEtbT_Nrso8/v-deo.htmlsi=54kZc_icHcmHpRU9 Watch this video and activate the translation and you will understand more
Hey Daniel, do you know of any good resources for learning the basics of ancient arabic writing compared to modern arabic writing? Is this something that varies from manuscript to manuscript? I can read modern arabic but trying to read some of these manuscripts can be confusing at times (not just lack of vowel markings but the shapes of some letters seem different). Thanks for you videos, they are very interesting so far :-)
The standard work on the paleography of the Quran is "The Abbasid Tradition" by François Déroche. It is a fairly big and expensive book and may be limited in availability. I got mine many years ago now and have not checked lately. Déroche is the one who described and classified the various scripts in the system that is commonly used today. Even with that book, it takes some time to learn to recognize the often fine differences. Maybe I will do a series of videos at some point talking about early script styles. DB
The Astronomer Farid’s dismissive attitude is unbelievable. As if he would go around openly admitting these things to people who asked. Muslims might kill a person for that, but he pretends it’s no big deal lol. He’s got an excuse for anything and everything.
@The Astronomer I saw that video but Farid Responds said he is able to connect the dots but it's by using modern Qurans. That video he made showed that the Quran went through editing, reediting,adding words phases which was done by human beings not Allah.
That's exactly what Yasir Qahdi was saying. He says every advanced student of islam and scholars know that the quran being perfectly preserved is all a lie and a myth. He was saying that after 1400 years of this myth, they have to come up with a better explanations because the western academics have already identified the holes in the myth.
I used to think there are major differences between these variants but thanks to this channel I have a much clearer idea how miniscule the differences are and that too due to writing. What's most appalling for me is that no other scripture on the face of earth comes even remotely close to this level of accuracy over a comparable period of time. Thanks for your work doc!
They aren’t minuscule they’re huge n many of the old texts were changed they call this “correcting” Even Sanaa manuscript which was a Quran from 3 decades after Muhammad’s death n it was way different to Quran today so they changed it Instead of realizing the 5% of Quran they could read from That time with Sanaa should’ve been used at the standard lol
Same conclusion here. This is nothing to be concern about. Allah protected the message from the koran and that is the most important. But good work from Daniel Brubaker. I respect hem a lot.
@@adnantamimi7026 the whole underwriting is completely different that’s why it was written over and changed Shabir ally hs a video on it explaining those Also did u know there’s a holy book from another religion that’s perfectly preserved? And that it’s only holy book that can prove its same as when revealed cuz we have original copy still
This only serves as a testimony to the preservation of the Quran, i.e. the fact that there were inconsistent copies but they did not make it into the mainstream well-known scripts or recitations.
I may be mistaken but I thing recto is the revers side. Not so good for writing being parchment ie animal skin the reverse side is like suede. Best parchment is vellum which is an unborn calf drawn from the womb if it’s mother. This is why biblical manuscripts were so unbelievably precious. One text like Isaiah 49ft would require a whole herd of young animals
@@Basaljet I double-checked. The recto is the right hand side of an open English book; the first side read before reading the back side, the verso (which is the left hand side of an English open book). I would be interested to know if this is different for Arabic script that is read from right to left. Indeed quite precious, you image of requiring the death of a whole herd of young animals in order to bring "life" to a text does make communication costly.
restnxist it is why the Catholic Church was accused of withholding the scriptures from the people. The value and price of a hand written bible was a small fortune. Only the aristocracy could read until the invention of the printing press. The internet is having the same effect on Islam. it is in the birth pangs of a new dynamic of interpretation and may not stay the course because there is very little if anything in a verifiable historical deposit from the 7th century unlike Catholicism.
I saw Shabir Ally speaking about the preservation of the Quran. He stated that they had dated a fragment of a Quran, the parchment AND THE INK, and both dated from near the time of Mohammed. I will search for the exact excerpt and will write back later.
Dr Jay.... now for the theological difficulties of where different words actually mean different things! A book of lies, made by liers, exposited by liers, believed by millions BUT being exposed by truth, love and compassion of Jesus followers. God bless you guys.
Even if the Quran was perfectly perserved, what does it change? Was Homer a messenger of god, The Odyssey is the same we have today, and far more well writen than the Quran.
The Quran is perfect in the time of Uthman, the fake Qur'an had been burned until none was left but if this one is most likely not found or found to be burned by the tahfiz because the fake Quran is hiding
Just a quick note on minute 14:25, the word Allah in the accusative tense (following ja’al) is repeated few time on the Quran: 6:100, 6:136, 13:16, 13:33, 14:30, 16:57, 16:62
Firstly, thank you. For opening my eyes. As a Muslim my believe has sky rocketed after seeing your vedio. It is 1500 old relegiouse and our people had tried to preserve the Quran in their limited means. This show how we tried to preserve. This is an oral tradition. This may come as a surprise to you even now it is memories all over the world. The mistake you have pointed out is very small it doesn't change to the mean of the Quran.
The Quran itself says that its perfectly preserved in 3 different instances. When we see here that it hasn't been preserved. People have added to it and erased from it, to conform in what the Hafs text says today, which is probably the text you have
YOU CANNOT CLAIM EXCUSE OF ORAL TRADITION ANYMORE. YOUR OWN AUTHENTIC ISLAMIC SOURCES CLAIM THAT UTHMAN IN 652 COMPILED ONE SINGLE UNIVERSAL QURAN AND THEN BURNED ALL OTHER VERSION. IF THAT IS TRUE THEN HOW YOU CAN EXPLAIN SO MANY VARIATION IN RASM TEXT OF DIFFERRENT QURAN. DAN BRUBAKER HAS JUST STARTED. WAIT FOR HIM TO FINISH.
@Variant Quran Daniel, I foresee a problem with the video titles. After 100 videos, viewers will not know what page, folio, or verses the video is discussing. Please include more identification in the video titles for future reviewing and research. Thanks.
Great work, thanks a lot. Perhaps in future videos you could emphasise some textual variants which result in readings that directly contradict the Hafs 1924 or other traditional readings.
I absolutely love your videos, knowledge and content. Do you have more compelling evidence of bigger mistakes? This proves that there are mistakes, but could be explained away(even though i believe a mistake is a mistake when you claim there are none whatsoever). I mean they(muslims scholars and apologists) would try and say that these are not mistakes that prove the koran isn't the word of God. Thank you for your hard work and please keep these coming!!!!
He is a scholar not an apologist. He is systematically going through every detail & documenting it so others can determine the importance. A couple of the differences on this page can have significant theological impact since one changes tense and another changes the number of people from plural to singular and another changes from speaking to the reader to some third party.
@@moe8686 You confidently say "The uthamni Quran is Same of today." I'm not inclined to take your word for it - I want to look and compare myself or at least hear from someone who has compared them. Where can we get a copy of "the Uthmani Quran"? As far as I know there are not any remaining copies of it. So the best approximation is the most ancient copies we can find which is what Dr. Brubaker is studying. I think what studies will show (they already have actually) is that the Quran is "fairly well preserved" (from some original), but not perfectly preserved, just like all other ancient literature that has been preserved at all. It would be good if Muslim scholars had published the texts of all ancient manuscripts of the Quran, but it seems they have not. Which is why I'm here, to learn what I can.
And it is the spiritual food of demons who by the way also feed on dung. Say: It has been revealed to me that a company of Jinns listened (to the Qur'an). They said, 'We have really heard a wonderful Recital! Surah 72.1 "What about the bone and the animal dung?" He said, "They are of the food of Jinns. Sahih al-Bukhari 3860
I would really like to see more major changes that have an impact on meaning. Revolutionary stuff. If Dr. Brubaker has already discovered and done a video on this, please let me know.
Yes, that would be interesting. But the main point in all this is to prove the Qur'an texts, many, many, many of them destroy the fallacy of a perfectly preserved without the slightest, minutest error. BOOOM!
As I sit here watching this video, I KNOW there has to be UA-cam staff running around their offices, with their hair on fire, trying to figure out which terms of services they can accuse you of violating, so they can shut you up.
For me it is interesting, how the field of textual criticism works. I understand for Muslims it is a difficult topic. For Christians less.. because we are dealing it since the time of Erasmus. To know some about textual criticism is to understand how preserved the Koran.
Someone with no mastery of Arabic pointing out minimal textual variations with no changing in meaning? Yeah, BS. Qur'an has been preserved throughout time and it is still the same message Muhammad (SAW) was given. I love Islam & victory to our religion and people.
@@ashleyn8946 Its not been changed lol. All the textual variations were presented to the Prophet. He taught the Quran with 7 qira'at. This isn't breaking news to us, we know the Quran has textual variations - but none of it is changes since the Prophet presented us with these qira'at.
@@YonikMalik Unfortunately if it is preserved then there’s really no excuse for the very human hotchpotch of ideas it contains, it badgering tone, repetition of the same stories, derivative nature etc. As to converts, in Europe the number is cancelled out by apostates. Of course nobody knows how many people are secret apostates and we all know why they keep quiet.
@@joygibbons5482 Interesting how your conclusions prove to be not only false but historically inaccurate. The Qur'an is revered and praised by even non Muslim historians, so all that "badgering tone" is just arrogance on your part. As for your mentioning of converts, that doesn't mean anything when Islam is still growing by births, people are reverting to Islam in masses, and the Qur'an proves to be the only secured and influential scripture of all time. Keep telling yourself that apostates are growing though, I'm sure it makes you feel better.
Dr. Brubaker, Generally, I find that all the examples including the last one show that the scribe probably memorized the Quran and was writing from his memory. His mistakes are with very similar phrases elsewhere in the Quran. I cited some replies in my other comments before. For example, the phrase إن في ذلك لآيات لكم إن كنتم مؤمنين is already found in 2 other chapters in the Quran namely Q2:248 and Q3:49 so the scribe could have very well by mistake used one of them one instead of إن في ذلكم لآيات لقوم يؤمنون which is the standard reading.
Same happened with the bible and what do Muslims say of the bible? Now if the bible is unchanged we can use it to judge Islam and Islam doesn't pass the test. Jesus was crucified Quran says no Pick your book
@@koppite9600 No it's not the same with bible give me one unequivocal statement of Jesus said I'm your god and worship me? Then give me nearest Bible of the time of Jesus you can't find it. All you have is translation bible go read the Aramaic bible can you find it? So you have to understand the whole Christianity is rigged don't you think?
@@hamedvakili7548 Christianity began before the bible was written. Traditions like baptism came many years before the bible. The texts were written many years after Jesus and even then we didn't have the bible.. 200 years after the texts were written is when the Christians saw it responsible to compile these texts into the bible. So the bible didn't start Christianity Christianity started on the day of Pentecost.
@@koppite9600 You wants to narate that's Quran preservation just like a Christian bible?...no..it's stupid to compare Quran to garbage like Christian bible...we Muslim have oral tradition transmission each person to person through memorize, our prophet obliged to Muslim to read regularly not like bible can only read by bishop or church until Marthin Luther revolt...so we have lots memorize Quran it's impossible to touch quranic word UNNOTICED....every correction in Ustman standard was minor..from different diallect..and understanding in transmission..and it's not touch any teaching in Islam and it's still preserve .....not add-on like Christian...like Trinity add-on , mark story about resurrection add-on , prostitute story add-on
@@bangkomar009 if the bible was very very important then Jesus would have written one of the books. Do you know the history of the Catholic church? If you did then you would know that the Quran is not an extension of Jesus's teachings. Doesn't the Quran say that Jesus wasnt crucified? His disciples were killed just for saying he was crucified and rose.
Thank you for your efforts! We live in the Middle East, and we hope to have both your previous book and your coming ones on Kindle because we can't get the physical copies here. Also, would you give permission for us one day to subtitle your videos in Arabic?
Hello friends. Please note the following corrections to the above video: 1) Around 11:40, the slide reads حوضهم rather than خوضهم as it should. 2) From 8:31, an incorrect portion of text exists in the slide before being rectified at 8:41. These will be minor distractions to most viewers, if noticed at all, but since I know there are some who are looking for anything to criticize, I wanted to acknowledge these upfront. I see no need to take down and re-post the video; so I just acknowledge them here. Thank you for understanding. DB
Hello Dr.. have you also taken account that the main preservation of the Quran is via memorization throught 7 dialects. So the manuscripts is more or less like memorization note rather than a final product. Just want to know what your opinion on this. Scribers error do occurs sometimes and you even mentioned without having another copy of the manuscript it is difficult to assess the errors.
Please pin this comment at the top so everybody can easily find it.
Pin this comment. Click the 3 dots next to your comment and click "pin"
Md Kamarussalihin Hj Shahrol Azman Then that manuscript should not be named a ‘manuscript’ in the museum, but just a note paper to help memorisation.
@@Md.Kamarussalihin Thank you for honoring me with this question. The answer is that I am open to considering all possibilities here, and always. I do not at the moment find the prospect of a text such as this, written on parchment, and clearly having been bound into a muṣḥaf, as being merely a memorization note with carelessness about the details such as alternate words, tenses, or other issues, to be intellectually satisfying. We might imagine such a thing, but this looks to me like something that was prepared for circulation, not as memorization notes. And further, if one wished to have a memorization note, then we might expect that what is written on the page would be very precise, so as to aide in precise and correct memorization. It does not, therefore, make sense to me that this would be a good explanation for what we see on this page. I do, however, remain ready to consider new information and happy for thoughtful discussion. Best to you, and I am thankful you are here. DB
For better discussion, here is a list of the details from Daniel Brubaker's video.
Slide 1:
MS.474.2003 (8r):"signs for you (plural) if you (plural) believe" versus Hafs Q6:99: "signs for a people who believe"
Slide 2 - inserted word:
MS.474.2003 (8r): bihi follows first occurrence of "fa-akhrajna," but inserted after second "fa-akhrajna." [unclear whether 3:43 slide of Hafs is pointing to the first or second occurrence of "from it" as we can see another occurrence to the left of the green boxed Arabic text. Brubaker or someone needs to explain this better.]
Slide 3 -missing script:
MS.474.2003 (8r): does not contain third person singular [translation and significance needed]
Hafs: contains third person singular "their fruit, when they bear"
Slide 4 - erasure:
MS.474.2003 (8r): 'alif erased changing "allah" to "lillahi" conforms to Hafs reading "to Allah." Allah as object (accusative form) not found anywhere in Quran.
Slide 5 different word:
MS.474.2003 (8r): yashrikun is written first. Then second scribe changes text but does not erase the extra letters.
Hafs: yashrifun?? [unclear what word is spoken by Brubaker. Writing all Arabic terms used would have been better.]
Slide 6 :
Hafs has one more tooth (short upwards stroke) than MS.474.2003 (8r) [discussion requested]
Slide 7 - Q6:106:
MS.474.2003 (8r): present continuous active voice - "that which he is revealing"
Hafs: present perfect passive voice - "that which has been revealed to you"
Slide 8 - Q6:107:
MS.474.2003 (8r): ashrakna - "Had Allah willed they would not have ascribed partners to Us"
Hafs: "Had Allah willed they would not have been polytheists."
Slide 9 - q6:107:
MS.474.2003 (8r): "a watcher over him/it ['alayhi]"
Hafs: "We have not appointed you a watcher over them ['alayhim]."
Slide 10 - q6:108:
MS.474.2003 (8r): 'alif
Hafs: no 'alif
Slide 11 - changes:
MS.474.2003 (8r): Q6:105 - 'alif inserted; Q6:106 - erasure, possibly a "waw"
Slide 12 - alternative word:
MS.474.2003 (8r): q6:110 - "plunged" as in Q6:91
Hafs: Q6:110 - "insolence"
Several theologically significant changes.
Lovingly done, thanks restnxist!
Fantastico👌👌
Thank you so much.
Great job mate. This makes the whole thing clear n easy to understand. Thanks
This Channel is deserving of its rapidly growing popularity. God bless you.
Yes, it's only a week old and it already has more than 7000 subscribers.
It will get there. Most people probably don’t know. But yes it should be millions of viewers. God bless the channel ✊❤️
Thank you for this kind comment. DB
@@3cents3 Good Idea. Why haven't I already done that?
I agree guys,
The Truth will set you free.
Truth about Quran well set muslims free.
Yes indeed it set us free..
@James Hall 9999999oo999o999ooop9o99o9oooo9o9o9o9oooo9ooooo9oo9ooooooobbb. Bbbbbbb bbbb.
@@greenzone7371 Take your pills.
@@Md.Kamarussalihin it do set you free because Jesus loves you... He want you to follow him.
@@Totoroallright Yes we are following Jesus..
Thank you for doing this! Many muslims may not know it - but you are actually the best friend they can have.
He is simply a liar . If you take this guy seriously you are foolish.
@@maxmudxareed1345 There are other scholarships going on. About the origins of Islam. And the historicity of muhammad!
@@exzoro8193 They're all quack and dishonest . Like Tom hollande.
Find your original text and come talk to us
You can get aroused by reading the song of songs
@@maxmudxareed1345 Tom Holland is a firm historicist. He believes muhammad existed. The scholarships I allude to say muhammad most likely never existed.
Al-Lah preserves those Quran variants well...
to magentically attract trinitarians and Jews into unitarian Christ.
@Adam Musthafa That's a strawman argument. It's very old an has been refuted many times. Christians dont claim 1+1+1=1. You obviously don't understand what christians believe. In order for your logic or your equation to equivocate, there would have to be a time in which God existed as 3 separate Gods and then fused himself into 1 God. Christians don't believe God was ever separated, nor do christians worship Jesus, The holy spirit, and the Father as 3 separate Gods. Rather, Christians believe God has always existed as ONE triune being. Therefore the more accurate equation would be ,
1P+1P+1P= 1G
Or in its simplest form,
3P= 1G
Where P represents Personhood, and G represents Deity or Godliness
@Adam Musthafa kiss your black stone and moon god, pagan!
@Adam Musthafa Arab paganism= Al-lah has 3 daughters and 1 black stone and 1 Kabbah
Islam paganism= Al-lah (moon god) has 1 black stone and 1 Kabbah
You are pagan as well, you just don't accept those 3 daughters
@@iranianskeptic Funny he accused Christians having 3 daughters as one God when it was from his own religion that admitted these things taking place. Typical lying abdool 😂
God bless you.
When u connect all the dots together.. u get holes!
What do u expect from a religion that doesnt want u to question or critique?
I expect stupidity and I am not disappointed.
I like your analogy "When you connect all the dots together, you get a (huge) hole". Exactly!
@Harris
Christianity never said 1+1+1 = 1
It's you muslim who say so and question us, "How?"
So, don't question us for your own stupidity!
Christian concept of the Trinity is 1x1x1 = 1 if I were to follow the muslim understanding of the Trinity.
@@yenomrofuoy5444 But abduls can't understand multiplication and even addition beyond four is too difficult for them, you know, 1400 years of inbreeding takes its toll.
@@yenomrofuoy5444 some says ∞ + ∞ + ∞ = ∞
When i was a child.. My Father, Mother, Teacher, basically everyone always told me "the Qur'an is preserved by Allah himself, it never changed even by a single letter and this is a miracle."
I'm an adult now, have access to the internet, and it is not so much of a miracle.
@Adam Musthafa
At least in your video, some Muslim aknowlegde that there are many difference Quran variants/manuscripts... Conclusion: the miracle of preservation that was used to be claim is nothing. It was proven that the Quran manuscripts are human made.
@Adam Musthafa So you think there are just 7 different Qurans, and that the skeletal text is always the same. This is proven not to be true, and Muslims scholars have now openly acknowledged it. There are 37(!) Qurans and they differ in consonants (razm). Just watch these videos (and others on this channel) to start: ua-cam.com/video/IM3P2id3Trw/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/ev1SXgwTxg4/v-deo.html
And here is a video and channel that will introduce you to all of the problems with the traditional history of Islam from the Hadith and Sirat. Did you know the terms Muhammad, Mecca, Islam and Muslim are nowhere to be found before the year 685AD (Mecca not even before 740!)? This, along with lots of other evidence, makes the idea that the Arab conquerors were Muslims simply impossible: ua-cam.com/video/zyHQ2JeEj6U/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/Rl25urZTWYA/v-deo.html
The problems with the Quranic page in this video should definitely concern you as well. According to Islamic tradition, the Quran was compiled by Uthman in the 650's while burning all others, so all Qurans after that should be perfect copies. What we see is that all Quranic manuscripts from the 8th century are different from today's Quran, and each other!
Your parents and teacher didn't lie. They told you what their believe, not the fact.
@Adam Musthafa If your "standard narrative" rationale explains everything, what's Sheikh Yasir Qadhi all worked up about?
@Adam Musthafa Dr. Qadhi's admission that "the standard narrative... has holes," sounded pretty current to me. Are you suggesting that his furtive video exchange with Hijab was recorded ten years ago, and that in the time since then he figured it all out so that it is now "nothing new"?
Wow thanks D Wood for referring us to this channel.
Who's here after watching Acts17apologetics, say hi.
My Nigerian sister.
Hi interesting wallahi
I can't remember. I think I first came because Jay highlighted it but it might have been David Wood.
Incredible and important work. Whatever you do, never disable comments
Totally agree, but be warned Daniel, this is the motherload of Hornets nests that has been poked. The dialogue will be brutal and bloody.
Thank you. I have no intention to disable comments; discussion among many people is one of the most important parts. DB
@@variantquran4505 I would wear a stab vest and leather neck collar seriously !!!!
Farid's video about this very video 😊
ua-cam.com/video/JmjURdYS5K0/v-deo.html
The root of Quran is running out of waters
The root of all evil is Islam!
It was never in or near water... but sure in camel p.🤣🤣
did you discover a trinitarian Quran
@Harris What do you think of the scholarships that say jesus most probably never existed? That he was just a made character?
Wrong, because even if different versions of the Qur’ân, like those of Ḥafṣ and Warsh, it wasn't that hard for me to figure out which was the correct version of the Qur’ân, with a careful reading of the Verses, by God's Grace.
11 variances on 1 page is a red flag that there might be more. A red flag with a Moon on it to be exact.
ikr haha. Dr. Jay said Dr Daniel has found about 4K variant in his entire research. We are waiting for more.
haha nice one dude
@@worldchanger7197 hatun found 93, 000 variants.
@@borneandayak6725 Oh boy hahah
@@borneandayak6725 _93000 variants_
And she has scrutinized only 24 of the 37 arabic qurans so far. More to come!!!
Come here from Islam Critique & D. Wood.. I pray for you & your magnificent work, Mr. Brubaker.. May God's grace be upon you.. GOD bless you!
I remember this idiom: "So if you see one mouse in your home, chances are good that there are many others"...Can you imagine, if you find 11 edited text in one page only, how many edited text you will find in the whole book...
1million edited text 😂😂😂😂. Islam is collapsing really fast.
@Tom Burnett haha 😀😀😄😄😂😂🤣😆 laughing alot. "scriber errors" cannot be the reason why their are 36 Qurans that do not match with the manuscripts.
@AKR That is a big difference.
Hatun Tash and her team of researchers have found 93,000 variants from 27 different quarans
@NYC125street "So what"?? So it hasn't been perfectly preserved "down to the single letter" as has been claimed repeatedly. So every Muslim whose faith rests on this false claim as proof of Allah's sovereignty has had his foundation stripped away.
And this doesn't even address variants in which one person says, "Howdy y'all" and the other says "Your money or your life."
There is no "preserved" Quran text. It has been changed, edited, corrected, erased and rewritten over centuries of time.
Of course, islam is nothing but politics.
Islam is nothing but a *HATE-MONGERING* cult!
@@yenomrofuoy5444 a war manual with rewards for martyrdom
Wrong.....the quran is preserved....
Angelika Neuwirth is the western world's leading Scholar concerning the Qur’an & knows more about this subject than this comparative amateur Brubaker.
She has the world's largest collection of ancient Qur'an manuscripts (microfiche /photos etc ) & she studied under the old German Orientalists who were world renowned.
Angelika inherited 'the lost archive' of Germany's vast collection of ancient Qur'ans from all over the Islamic world after it was hidden by Anton Spitaler (an interesting event in itself).
In her talk (link below), she says:
"To this very day, the Qur'an is taught as an orally performed text, whose phonetic realisation is cherished as an aesthetically sophisticated art. The Oral transmission of the Qur'an is highly esteemed even considered superior to the written text. Thus the printed Cairo edition of the Qur'an most frequently used today is based not on manuscripts but on oral tradition."
ua-cam.com/video/qHCeYSvazY4/v-deo.html
She leads the Quranic Arabic Corpus project which has the most detailed information in English about the Qur’an in one place - www.corpus.quran.com
So Muslims are absolutely right when they say that the Qur'an (the oral/memorised Recitation in all qira'at) is 100% the SAME as it was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him.
This was passed down throughout the generations from 'heart to heart - memory to memory' by millions of Huffaz (urdu plural of singular Hafiz)
UNCHANGED!
NOT A SINGLE LETTER CHANGE IN ANY OF THE RECITATIONS!
The written Qur'an is called the Mus'haf. This is SECONDARY (a backup) to the oral/memorised Qur'an to help ppl to read.
Mus'haf can have differences due to:
Scripts - rasm / orthography.
The Qira'ah that is being written.
Scribal mistakes.
Brubaker, being a Christian Missionary, loves to mislead /distract people away from the facts that the Qur’an, as it is RECITED ANYWHERE IN THE World is the same Qur'an that was taught by the Prophet peace be upon him to his Companions.
Very good analysis Dr Brubaker. I am not fussed about such variants in manuscripts as Quran is primarily based on the tradition of continued recitations for generations base on memorizing. Scribes made several mistakes which is accepted by greatest Muslim manuscript analysts already. The pivotal issue would be to see whether the meanings changed which I have noticed in variant recitation based manuscripts as well. Thank you for your effort.
M J Allah says in Quran clearly that he did allow some verses to be forgotten to be replaced by better verses. So I don’t consider that to have had affected the planning of Allah with regard to the ultimate preservation intended
What happened to the claim that the Quran is perfectly preserved word for word from the beginning. Oh, sorry, I forget, when was the "first" Quran readily available and considered as the standard text.
@@simkwakia (1). The Quran was revealed to Prophet Muhammad pbuh on piecemeal basis over 23 years. During each revelation, the prophet would recite to companions who recite, memorize and practice the message (many wrote them down on piecemeal basis). This continued until the whole Quran was revealed. Note: The recitation was memorized and preserved over those 23 years. (2) Those writing were collected by first Khalifa Abu Bakar and kept. (3) The whole Quran revealed was put into a book (5 copies) by third Khalifah Othman from the memorisation of the companions together with those writings which were kept. Note : Some of these copies are still available and millions are memorizer of Quran today. (4) The Quran printed and read therefrom until today all over the world has the same text of that third Khalifah's.
@@sethsuleiman4419
ua-cam.com/video/d225z-Yn0vk/v-deo.html
Please explain this, between
Muhammad Hijab and Dr Yasir Qadhi, in the video.
THE STANDARD NARRATIVE HAVE HOLES IN IT, so says our Islamic scholar Dr Yasir Qadhi. Why? Because it cannot handle textual criticism, historical criticism, and source criticism.
PERFECTLY PRESERVED
Viewers please spread this hugely informative channel to other social media platforms and other You tube channels.
Beautiful presentation 👌
Thank you Dr Brubaker for the great work you doing. God bless you abundantly ✊❤️
I understood and like it , when you mentioned
Here:
Hafs:
Thank You
I like Hamza Zayyat
I really like the way you explain the text differences... Keep up it... May God bless you....
6:7 Al-An'aam
وَلَوْ نَزَّلْنَا عَلَيْكَ كِتَابًا فِي قِرْطَاسٍ فَلَمَسُوهُ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ لَقَالَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا إِنْ هَٰذَا إِلَّا سِحْرٌ مُبِينٌ
And even if We had sent down unto you (O Muhammad SAW) a Message written on paper so that they could touch it with their hands, the disbelievers would have said: "This is nothing but obvious magic!"
The phrase لو شاء الله ما أشركنا is found in the same chapter Q6:148. The Scribe probably memorizes the Quran and got mixed with verse 107
Here is Dr. Jeferson Chagas form Brazil. Congratulations on your researches on variants in the Qur'an. I am preparing a course for Portuguese-speaking Christians about the Science e of the Qur'an, and certainly, your research will be explored in this program. This field of study is sensitive, and you do that without dehumanizing Muslims. Congratulations again.
Thank you, Dr. Chagas. Yes, my purpose is serious inquiry and respectful discussion, and I mean no harm or unkindness to any person; thank you for recognizing that. Best to you. DB
Angelika Neuwirth is the western world's leading Scholar concerning the Qur’an & knows more about this subject than this comparative amateur Brubaker.
She has the world's largest collection of ancient Qur'an manuscripts (microfiche /photos etc ) & she studied under the old German Orientalists who were world renowned.
Angelika inherited 'the lost archive' of Germany's vast collection of ancient Qur'ans from all over the Islamic world after it was hidden by Anton Spitaler (an interesting event in itself).
In her talk (link below), she says:
"To this very day, the Qur'an is taught as an orally performed text, whose phonetic realisation is cherished as an aesthetically sophisticated art. The Oral transmission of the Qur'an is highly esteemed even considered superior to the written text. Thus the printed Cairo edition of the Qur'an most frequently used today is based not on manuscripts but on oral tradition."
ua-cam.com/video/qHCeYSvazY4/v-deo.html
She leads the Quranic Arabic Corpus project which has the most detailed information in English about the Qur’an in one place - www.corpus.quran.com
So Muslims are absolutely right when they say that the Qur'an (the oral/memorised Recitation in all qira'at) is 100% the SAME as it was revealed to the Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him.
This was passed down throughout the generations from 'heart to heart - memory to memory' by millions of Huffaz (urdu plural of singular Hafiz)
UNCHANGED!
NOT A SINGLE LETTER CHANGE IN ANY OF THE RECITATIONS!
The written Qur'an is called the Mus'haf. This is SECONDARY (a backup) to the oral/memorised Qur'an to help ppl to read.
Mus'haf can have differences due to:
Scripts - rasm / orthography.
The Qira'ah that is being written.
Scribal mistakes.
Brubaker, being a Christian Missionary, loves to mislead /distract people away from the facts that the Qur’an, as it is RECITED ANYWHERE IN THE World is the same Qur'an that was taught by the Prophet peace be upon him to his Companions.
@@mikhan5191 🙄 Too late for that sonny. Shabir Ally, Yasir Qadhi had all admitted of variations existing in the texts. Also, there are at least 37 variations of the Arabic Quran still existing around now.
@@mikhan5191 The video literally pared down words and marks of ancient Arabic. The evidence is literally right before you. He understands full Arabic so you've got no excuse.
Great job...
Hindustan
Thanks for the efforts. Learning much.
Yes I agree Quran is perfectly preserved with many variants. Allah-boo-akbar.
ua-cam.com/video/jKL48UkMpi8/v-deo.html
Muslim should say: 23 variants Quran are perfectly preserved
Bible is not preserved..Even today you don't have original bible but you have changed bible😂😂😉👻
@@hussnain6114 You just insulted Allah because Allah said the Torah and gospel are his words
So you admit Allah couldn’t protect the Torah and the gospel
The name is Brubaker , Daniel Brubaker ...
😎 Doctor Daniel Brubaker 😎
😎
The Muslims first Caliph was Abubakar Muhammad's best friend.
@PRandC Team
Caliph Dr. Brubakr al Americano (SAW) (PHUB) (Holy Smoly guacamoley) 🍾🕺💃🕺💃
Dr Daniel Qur'anbaker
@@williamjames212 they all argued wether muhammad was really a prophet
D.Wood brought me here. Good job with very good explanation.
The thumbnail: "Whats the history of this page?"
Dr. Brubaker's face be like: 😊
HAHA!
He said it is from early 8th century. Approximately 100 years from the death of M. check min 0:42
@@worldchanger7197 100 years and full of errors corrections and variations! dannngggg imagine how the first quran was like! bbahahahaha. Share this video!!!
@@TruthaboutIslam the big issue now is finding 11 variant in 1 page only. This is a red flag
@@worldchanger7197 It is possibly earlier than early 8th century, but not (I think) later. I try to date conservatively. DB
@@variantquran4505 Thanks for your time, did you find any Rasm text referring to Becca? Or that might have been altered to read Mecca?
ua-cam.com/video/TIw1OPH6QvM/v-deo.html
keep up this great work. very insightful.
It was hand written many times from memory. spelling error’s happen it’s human nature. The bigger issue here as xtians fail to see is that the Quran is not a book. It’s a recital so this can be easily written off. The Quran is totally preserved as the recital
But we all get told over and over the written Arabic Quran is identical around the world. Letter for letter dot for dot. Clearly, it is not.
If you can't write it correctly there is no way you can recite it correctly. Ever hear of the game Chinese whispers?
That is total preservation..😂😂😂😂😂
Thank you for another brilliant video. Looking forward to more!
God bless and protect you Doctor
Allah is so great he has perfectly preserved all the variants of his quran.
Sir u are right verses 99 is إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُون, but they changed, if u look few words before إِنَّ فِي ذَٰلِكُمْ so the picture of إِن is exactly same, so your are right it is إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُون because here they removed إِن كُنتُمْ and modified تُؤْمِنُون with يؤْمِنُون
also they changed بها to بِهِ in كَمَا لَمْ يُؤْمِنُوا بِهِ أَوَّلَ مَرَّةٍ وَنَذَرُهُمْ فِي طُغْيَانِهِمْ يَعْمَهُونَ just before last aya you mentioned at the end of your video.
well done and thanks for your work, even i speak Arabic but i am not as accurate as you are, everyone subscribe please, to appreciate his valuable work.
hmmm so you are an Arab huh
As someone who many years ago studied the Hebrew text of the Jewish scriptures I find this fascinating. This scribe was not having a good day! Your work is much appreciated, just what is needed to understand the nature of the Qur'an today. Thank you for these videos.
שלום
I have a serious question.
If the Quran is supposed to be the only miracle that Mohamed ever did. How is this possible if he never wrote anything down and it was only compiled after by others? So how could it be a miracle? I’ve heard Muslims claim it was because of how beautifully it was written but Mohamed never even wrote it. So how is this a “miracle” that proves that Mohamed was right? There have been many classic works of literature that far surpass the jumbled nonsensical way that the Quran was mashed together. I’ve seen children who can write more coherent stories. So my question is genuine and not meant to sound mean but how is this book, that he never even wrote, a miracle that proves him to be a prophet?
Actually it was mocked by many well known scholars in the Muslim world like ar-Razzi or ar-Rawandi but since criticizing the Quran can get you killed, this idea of literary excellency has been enforced with threats and violence over the ages, after a while it became like an automated response, a reflex Muslims acquire at a very young age.
Quran is not a miracle at all, even the arabs at the time did not believe it at all, it was after they muslims conquered Mecca that they converted in masses. Here is a link to a video
m.ua-cam.com/video/2sIIV3Ld9EE/v-deo.html
Firstly, The prophet PBUH is illiterate.
Secondly, it did got written down by his fellow companion. The revelation came within 23 years of his prophethood so not many of the same companion was always there while some were there halfway. Thats why during the Time of Uthman RA every known memorizer, reciter and those who hold a copy were gathered to compiled the textual Quran and after the finish product, the other copies were burned to avoid confusion.
I think Muslims say M received and recited it. Others memorized and eventually write it down and burned all the deviant copies (except this one it now seems) and that the resulting book was so awesome it head to be a miracle. It's not M''s miracle - the words themselves are the miracle and they are an exact copy of the (platonic) one in heaven.
Mohammed did other miracles.
Hello Dr Brubaker I love your videos and I hope you will keep coming often to help us learn what has been being hidden since centuries.
Thank you for your work!
This is proving to be an awesome resource...keep these videos coming!
Fascinating work. Keep it up!
I am glad there isn't any difference in meaning! Thank you, I feel better now
Dude theirs like almost no difference tho. Thats kinda crazy. I would like to see original bible manuscripts compared to today
@@hh-hj9fn the original manuscripts are lost, just like the ones of the Quran, the Old Testament have some minor textual differences between the Greek oldest translation, the Death See Scrolls and the Masoretoc text. while in the New Testament words have been changed and phrases and whole passages have been added
@@floptaxie68u ideot We have original quran with us in topaki musiem in turkey
I want that library of yours😍
I am so thankful for it. It took many years to build up to this point... DB
still: a certain part of the islamic books is dedicated to farting... very important to allah
This is the first time I hear of this... interesting to see different words... so theperson copying can choose a different word he thinks fits best. Thank you for your work. With social media the truth will reach everyone.
Thank you for showing us all this!
Very interesting. Thanks for your work. Looking forward to more.
There are more variants in the Quran manuscripts (93,000) and Qiraat than there are words in the Qur’an (77,797)! :)
What if Shia Mahdi brings the original Quran.
LOL
Those are big numbers, Any reference to it?
There are readings of the Holy Qur’an, and there is a hadith that explains this, and there are those who memorize all the readings, and this matter is known, and all the readings are from God, and there is a hadith that explains that, as the readings existed even in the time of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace.
3 dislikes from people who are triggered by this video🎥
I am not disliking. I am happy to see trinitarians talk about Quran.
@@Neorient Islam is non trinitarian Christianity?
So what there are different versions of the Qur’ân, like those of Ḥafṣ and Warsh? It wasn't that hard for me to figure out which was the correct version of the Qur’ân, with a careful reading of the Verses, by God's Grace.
Your name is no longer Brubaker but Dr Quranbreaker
What he did not tell you is that the readings existed in the time of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, and that there is a hadith that explains that the readings are from God Almighty and that there are those who memorize all the readings. Also, the Holy Qur’an is memorized by memorization and not by writing. Now I can obtain a license, Permissibility is that I have a chain of transmission that reaches the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace. For example, I memorized it from a sheikh, and this sheikh memorized it from a sheikh. And so on, all the way to the Tabi’i, all the way to the Companion, and all the way to the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace ua-cam.com/video/MEtbT_Nrso8/v-deo.htmlsi=54kZc_icHcmHpRU9
Watch this video and activate the translation and you will understand more
Notice how none of this differences adds or takes away from the verse 😂 you christians added the trinity to your bible so he hasn’t broken anything
Fantastic work Dr Brubaker. Highly appreciated. You have patience of a "prophet". God Bless.
What a great job sir
You're in our prayers 🙏♥️
Thank you for the truth. 🔥
Awesome work Dr. Daniel, keep it up!
Please get Dr. Shady Nasser on your podcast!
He is scheduled to come on later this month. Glad to hear of your interest - thanks! DB
Hey Daniel, do you know of any good resources for learning the basics of ancient arabic writing compared to modern arabic writing? Is this something that varies from manuscript to manuscript? I can read modern arabic but trying to read some of these manuscripts can be confusing at times (not just lack of vowel markings but the shapes of some letters seem different).
Thanks for you videos, they are very interesting so far :-)
The standard work on the paleography of the Quran is "The Abbasid Tradition" by François Déroche. It is a fairly big and expensive book and may be limited in availability. I got mine many years ago now and have not checked lately. Déroche is the one who described and classified the various scripts in the system that is commonly used today. Even with that book, it takes some time to learn to recognize the often fine differences. Maybe I will do a series of videos at some point talking about early script styles. DB
This is a study that shows us corrections in Quran, thank you for doing such as a great job.
Farid Farts will soon be making a video saying: "it doesn't say that"
The Astronomer Farid’s dismissive attitude is unbelievable. As if he would go around openly admitting these things to people who asked. Muslims might kill a person for that, but he pretends it’s no big deal lol. He’s got an excuse for anything and everything.
@The Astronomer Thx for sharing
@@lancesteinke3732 -Allah- Farid know best 😁
@The Astronomer I saw that video but Farid Responds said he is able to connect the dots but it's by using modern Qurans. That video he made showed that the Quran went through editing, reediting,adding words phases which was done by human beings not Allah.
salam.. debunk you brubaker
ua-cam.com/video/JmjURdYS5K0/v-deo.html
I'm just wondering how Islamic scholars didn't find these discrepancies throughout centuries.
Pssst...they did! And they hid it from their followers.
That's exactly what Yasir Qahdi was saying. He says every advanced student of islam and scholars know that the quran being perfectly preserved is all a lie and a myth. He was saying that after 1400 years of this myth, they have to come up with a better explanations because the western academics have already identified the holes in the myth.
because in Islam you are not allowed to ask too may questions sunnah.com/bukhari/43/23
They did. They’ve known. But they’ve been lying to their listeners
Also, why was there no attempt to eliminate all the evidence pointing against the perfect preservation of the Quran?
I used to think there are major differences between these variants but thanks to this channel I have a much clearer idea how miniscule the differences are and that too due to writing. What's most appalling for me is that no other scripture on the face of earth comes even remotely close to this level of accuracy over a comparable period of time. Thanks for your work doc!
They aren’t minuscule they’re huge n many of the old texts were changed they call this “correcting”
Even Sanaa manuscript which was a Quran from 3 decades after Muhammad’s death n it was way different to Quran today so they changed it
Instead of realizing the 5% of Quran they could read from
That time with Sanaa should’ve been used at the standard lol
Bible.🥰☦
Same conclusion here. This is nothing to be concern about. Allah protected the message from the koran and that is the most important. But good work from Daniel Brubaker. I respect hem a lot.
@@Ss3gokus give me one verse from Sana manuscript which is not in current version.
@@adnantamimi7026 the whole underwriting is completely different that’s why it was written over and changed
Shabir ally hs a video on it explaining those
Also did u know there’s a holy book from another religion that’s perfectly preserved?
And that it’s only holy book that can prove its same as when revealed cuz we have original copy still
This only serves as a testimony to the preservation of the Quran, i.e. the fact that there were inconsistent copies but they did not make it into the mainstream well-known scripts or recitations.
"8r" refers to the "recto" side or the front side of page 8. "8v" would refers to the "verso" side of back side of the leaf of paper.
I may be mistaken but I thing recto is the revers side. Not so good for writing being parchment ie animal skin the reverse side is like suede. Best parchment is vellum which is an unborn calf drawn from the womb if it’s mother. This is why biblical manuscripts were so unbelievably precious. One text like Isaiah 49ft would require a whole herd of young animals
@@Basaljet I double-checked. The recto is the right hand side of an open English book; the first side read before reading the back side, the verso (which is the left hand side of an English open book). I would be interested to know if this is different for Arabic script that is read from right to left.
Indeed quite precious, you image of requiring the death of a whole herd of young animals in order to bring "life" to a text does make communication costly.
restnxist it is why the Catholic Church was accused of withholding the scriptures from the people. The value and price of a hand written bible was a small fortune. Only the aristocracy could read until the invention of the printing press. The internet is having the same effect on Islam. it is in the birth pangs of a new dynamic of interpretation and may not stay the course because there is very little if anything in a verifiable historical deposit from the 7th century unlike Catholicism.
Thank you for this. Looking forward for your next video. Peace and love 🙏
hey, great work.
make your book available in kindle version/google play book, please.
I saw Shabir Ally speaking about the preservation of the Quran. He stated that they had dated a fragment of a Quran, the parchment AND THE INK, and both dated from near the time of Mohammed. I will search for the exact excerpt and will write back later.
Shabir Ally doesn't know what he is talking about. Here is the truth ua-cam.com/video/jKL48UkMpi8/v-deo.html
Dr Jay.... now for the theological difficulties of where different words actually mean different things! A book of lies, made by liers, exposited by liers, believed by millions BUT being exposed by truth, love and compassion of Jesus followers. God bless you guys.
Wonderful video and content Dr.
Even if the Quran was perfectly perserved, what does it change? Was Homer a messenger of god, The Odyssey is the same we have today, and far more well writen than the Quran.
The Quran is perfect
in the time of Uthman, the fake Qur'an had been burned until none was left
but if this one is most likely not found or found to be burned by the tahfiz because the fake Quran is hiding
"PERFECT PRESERVATION!!". Right, of course....
God bless you sir!! Great video!
Just a quick note on minute 14:25, the word Allah in the accusative tense (following ja’al) is repeated few time on the Quran: 6:100, 6:136, 13:16, 13:33, 14:30, 16:57, 16:62
Firstly, thank you. For opening my eyes. As a Muslim my believe has sky rocketed after seeing your vedio. It is 1500 old relegiouse and our people had tried to preserve the Quran in their limited means. This show how we tried to preserve. This is an oral tradition. This may come as a surprise to you even now it is memories all over the world. The mistake you have pointed out is very small it doesn't change to the mean of the Quran.
The Quran itself says that its perfectly preserved in 3 different instances. When we see here that it hasn't been preserved. People have added to it and erased from it, to conform in what the Hafs text says today, which is probably the text you have
@Indigator Veritatis bring it on brother..
ua-cam.com/video/5VGfyAQrxBQ/v-deo.html
@Indigator Veritatis ua-cam.com/video/iZhhMPF9RWA/v-deo.html
@Indigator Veritatis ua-cam.com/video/PyisQivDWGI/v-deo.html
YOU CANNOT CLAIM EXCUSE OF ORAL TRADITION ANYMORE. YOUR OWN AUTHENTIC ISLAMIC SOURCES CLAIM THAT UTHMAN IN 652 COMPILED ONE SINGLE UNIVERSAL QURAN AND THEN BURNED ALL OTHER VERSION. IF THAT IS TRUE THEN HOW YOU CAN EXPLAIN SO MANY VARIATION IN RASM TEXT OF DIFFERRENT QURAN. DAN BRUBAKER HAS JUST STARTED. WAIT FOR HIM TO FINISH.
Great to see so much scholarly and informed discussion in the comment section!
@Variant Quran Daniel, I foresee a problem with the video titles. After 100 videos, viewers will not know what page, folio, or verses the video is discussing. Please include more identification in the video titles for future reviewing and research. Thanks.
Dr. Brubaker thank you so much. Very informative.
Great work, thanks a lot. Perhaps in future videos you could emphasise some textual variants which result in readings that directly contradict the Hafs 1924 or other traditional readings.
Coming from David Wood video. You're so respectful to everyone (unlike David lol). Thank you.
I absolutely love your videos, knowledge and content. Do you have more compelling evidence of bigger mistakes? This proves that there are mistakes, but could be explained away(even though i believe a mistake is a mistake when you claim there are none whatsoever). I mean they(muslims scholars and apologists) would try and say that these are not mistakes that prove the koran isn't the word of God. Thank you for your hard work and please keep these coming!!!!
He is a scholar not an apologist. He is systematically going through every detail & documenting it so others can determine the importance.
A couple of the differences on this page can have significant theological impact since one changes tense and another changes the number of people from plural to singular and another changes from speaking to the reader to some third party.
Patience please. These are the first trickles after 1370 years...
@@moe8686 You confidently say "The uthamni Quran is Same of today." I'm not inclined to take your word for it - I want to look and compare myself or at least hear from someone who has compared them. Where can we get a copy of "the Uthmani Quran"? As far as I know there are not any remaining copies of it. So the best approximation is the most ancient copies we can find which is what Dr. Brubaker is studying. I think what studies will show (they already have actually) is that the Quran is "fairly well preserved" (from some original), but not perfectly preserved, just like all other ancient literature that has been preserved at all. It would be good if Muslim scholars had published the texts of all ancient manuscripts of the Quran, but it seems they have not. Which is why I'm here, to learn what I can.
@@moe8686 no, they say there isn't any difference in any letter from then to today and this proves it isn't preserved at all.
O wow. This is an eye opener. Thanks for sharing . Very informative
Great Infor just 1min into the video 1:39. Amazing !
thank you sir, for the HONESTY and TRUTH, that you have stated
Good Work
#ExMuslim
💙💙❤❤
Yayyyy another video! Thank you professor 😌
This Qur'an is daif
😂😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
And it is the spiritual food of demons who by the way also feed on dung.
Say: It has been revealed to me that a company of Jinns listened (to the Qur'an). They said, 'We have really heard a wonderful Recital! Surah 72.1
"What about the bone and the animal dung?" He said, "They are of the food of Jinns. Sahih al-Bukhari 3860
Hafs Quran is sahih 🤣🤣🤣
Oh ein Deutscher ^^
This video was so helpful and well done. Thank you for making this material available!
Let's hear it for the Tower of Babel. e.g. This isn't a Greek restaurant. Your menu is upside down.
I would really like to see more major changes that have an impact on meaning. Revolutionary stuff. If Dr. Brubaker has already discovered and done a video on this, please let me know.
Yes, that would be interesting. But the main point in all this is to prove the Qur'an texts, many, many, many of them destroy the fallacy of a perfectly preserved without the slightest, minutest error.
BOOOM!
As I sit here watching this video, I KNOW there has to be UA-cam staff running around their offices, with their hair on fire, trying to figure out which terms of services they can accuse you of violating, so they can shut you up.
I assure you nobody cares to shut him up
Here from David Wood’s video to check out the variants
For me it is interesting, how the field of textual criticism works. I understand for Muslims it is a difficult topic. For Christians less.. because we are dealing it since the time of Erasmus.
To know some about textual criticism is to understand how preserved the Koran.
Erasmus? No, since St. Jerome (4th century)
Professor Wood sent me here to ensure more vids are made in this channel
Someone with no mastery of Arabic pointing out minimal textual variations with no changing in meaning? Yeah, BS. Qur'an has been preserved throughout time and it is still the same message Muhammad (SAW) was given. I love Islam & victory to our religion and people.
@api645 cope with the fact that the Qur'an is preserved and Islam is spreading with massive amount of converts every year? Sure. Gladly will.
@@ashleyn8946 Its not been changed lol. All the textual variations were presented to the Prophet. He taught the Quran with 7 qira'at. This isn't breaking news to us, we know the Quran has textual variations - but none of it is changes since the Prophet presented us with these qira'at.
@@YonikMalik Unfortunately if it is preserved then there’s really no excuse for the very human hotchpotch of ideas it contains, it badgering tone, repetition of the same stories, derivative nature etc.
As to converts, in Europe the number is cancelled out by apostates. Of course nobody knows how many people are secret apostates and we all know why they keep quiet.
@@joygibbons5482 Interesting how your conclusions prove to be not only false but historically inaccurate. The Qur'an is revered and praised by even non Muslim historians, so all that "badgering tone" is just arrogance on your part.
As for your mentioning of converts, that doesn't mean anything when Islam is still growing by births, people are reverting to Islam in masses, and the Qur'an proves to be the only secured and influential scripture of all time. Keep telling yourself that apostates are growing though, I'm sure it makes you feel better.
@@YonikMalik *Someone with no mastery of Arabic*
From what I see he is a scholar who have more mastery of Arabic then most Arabs.
Dr. Brubaker,
Generally, I find that all the examples including the last one show that the scribe probably memorized the Quran and was writing from his memory. His mistakes are with very similar phrases elsewhere in the Quran. I cited some replies in my other comments before. For example, the phrase إن في ذلك لآيات لكم إن كنتم مؤمنين is already found in 2 other chapters in the Quran namely Q2:248 and Q3:49 so the scribe could have very well by mistake used one of them one instead of إن في ذلكم لآيات لقوم يؤمنون which is the standard reading.
So basically, what you're saying is that "the Quran has not been perfectly preserved!"
because it is easier than actually watching the video
God has guided you hear my friend. Listen and let the love of Christ wash over you. Keep on listening to the truth until you believe it.
Stil this Made my believe stronger
@@amreel-kabarity9242 🤣🤣🤣abdool
@@amreel-kabarity9242 same like me
Thank you so much for all your work on this subject. This is extremely helpful to know.
Daniel thanks for exposing the face of his Quran. Please make more videos of the Qurans. Thanks
First we have to notice all the difference that he mentioned didn't change the context at all
Same happened with the bible and what do Muslims say of the bible?
Now if the bible is unchanged we can use it to judge Islam and Islam doesn't pass the test. Jesus was crucified Quran says no
Pick your book
@@koppite9600 No it's not the same with bible give me one unequivocal statement of Jesus said I'm your god and worship me? Then give me nearest Bible of the time of Jesus you can't find it. All you have is translation bible go read the Aramaic bible can you find it? So you have to understand the whole Christianity is rigged don't you think?
@@hamedvakili7548 Christianity began before the bible was written. Traditions like baptism came many years before the bible. The texts were written many years after Jesus and even then we didn't have the bible.. 200 years after the texts were written is when the Christians saw it responsible to compile these texts into the bible.
So the bible didn't start Christianity Christianity started on the day of Pentecost.
@@koppite9600 You wants to narate that's Quran preservation just like a Christian bible?...no..it's stupid to compare Quran to garbage like Christian bible...we Muslim have oral tradition transmission each person to person through memorize, our prophet obliged to Muslim to read regularly not like bible can only read by bishop or church until Marthin Luther revolt...so we have lots memorize Quran it's impossible to touch quranic word UNNOTICED....every correction in Ustman standard was minor..from different diallect..and understanding in transmission..and it's not touch any teaching in Islam and it's still preserve .....not add-on like Christian...like Trinity add-on , mark story about resurrection add-on , prostitute story add-on
@@bangkomar009 if the bible was very very important then Jesus would have written one of the books.
Do you know the history of the Catholic church? If you did then you would know that the Quran is not an extension of Jesus's teachings.
Doesn't the Quran say that Jesus wasnt crucified? His disciples were killed just for saying he was crucified and rose.
Thank you for your efforts! We live in the Middle East, and we hope to have both your previous book and your coming ones on Kindle because we can't get the physical copies here. Also, would you give permission for us one day to subtitle your videos in Arabic?
Thank you for the upload Dr.