Why Would Anybody Care About Modelica?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 сер 2024
  • A talk I gave for RPI about how I came to be involved in Modelica and an example of one interesting application I worked on.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @lvanfretti
    @lvanfretti 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you so much Mike, this is a really fun and inspiring presentation!

  • @Alexx_111
    @Alexx_111 7 місяців тому

    Just bought your book, and stumbled upon this video! So well presented, and absolutely inspiring.

  • @robinsonerazo3680
    @robinsonerazo3680 2 роки тому +2

    Very interesting lecture. It motivated me to learning Modelica

  • @gwr-BSL
    @gwr-BSL 2 роки тому +1

    Great talk! I would just like correct the statement early on (around 1:50) that the ENIAC was the first computer ever made. The first electronic, programmable computer (otherwise we would have to go back earlier in history) made according to Wikipedia was the Z1 or at least the Z3 invented by Konrad Zuse as early as 1938. The Z3 was proven to be Turing-complete in 1998.

  • @gondala
    @gondala Рік тому

    great talk! such inspiring talk! Thank you for convincing me to use modelica. Basically, I work a lot with Simulink/Matlab, and I am motivated to learn new simulation approach using modelica. Thank you!

  • @victormavika9168
    @victormavika9168 Рік тому

    Will please make more videos like this?

  • @shivas7535
    @shivas7535 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you Sir!!

  • @CDinkle
    @CDinkle 10 місяців тому

    Was it "bad luck" (a coincidence) that the ABS excitation landed on the resonant frequency of the mount, or is it instead a possibility that it settled to that frequency, perhaps due to some aspect of the mount that differed from the other engine components, such as composition material?

  • @soumadeepde2067
    @soumadeepde2067 2 роки тому

    Great video 👍

  • @galactromeda
    @galactromeda 2 роки тому +1

    All of these problems, and many more, can be solved using tools like Modelica.

  • @dickpiano1802
    @dickpiano1802 2 роки тому +1

    It seems like these tools are created with the assumption that people
    1. have a problem
    2. use math to describe the problem
    3. use the computer to solve the math
    Sadly, people in industry skip the part with the math. They want to jump straight to the discrete domain. Especially nowadays when you have a lot of people with software background involved in control systems design, etc.
    As a testament to that, have a look at the success of Stateflow. Nowadays people are buying MathWorks products just so they can use Stateflow. Stateflow is closest you can get to imperative code out of all modeling products.

  • @HighLevelNinja
    @HighLevelNinja 2 роки тому

    Hidden Figures. Computers used to be super-math wizards who could actually do these things. And this is who came up with the tables for us mere mortals to refer to.
    As for the ABS in the hybrid Escape, yeppers, I most definitely heard about it. But then again, I know people who knew who were also on the project.
    As for you being old, dude. Just stop. I started working in FPSD when the EEC was a brand new idea. Yeah. That was a fun ride.