If you enjoyed this lesson could you do me a favour and HIT that like button on the video! Helps me a lot ❤ subscribe too so you don't miss the next lesson coming out! Thanks guys! 🙏🏻
Hello Sarah. Nice to meet you again. Thank you for the very useful lesson! Thanks to your explanation, from now on I understand the difference between the past continuos tense and the past perfect continuous tense. This has been a confusing thing for long time for me. Here is my reply to your question. The correct answer is as follows: Rob had been living in the same house for five years before he redecorated the sitting room. See you soon.
Respected Ma'am, being undisputedly the greatest grammarian on this planet, you are earnestly entreated with folded hands to let me know which of the following options in the context would be the more appropriate -Question -The passengers of the bus ----(were sleeping/had been sleeping) when the accident happened.
The more appropriate option in this context is: "The passengers of the bus were sleeping when the accident happened." "Were sleeping" is used to describe an action that was ongoing at a specific point in the past, which fits the context of what the passengers were doing when the accident occurred.
Respected Ma'am, I do watch your videos religiously every day, because that you are the best of all grammarians across the globe admits no doubt.Ma,am,do please be kind enough to provide solution to the following Tense-based issue that different teachers have answered differently -Question --They reached the station.Then the train left.(Join the sentences using 'When '). My probable answers-(A) When they reached the station, the train left (B) When they had reached the station, the train left (The train left when they had reached the station.Ma,am, please let me know which options would be grammatically and semantically correct and which not.I keep awaiting your valued take on this with a growing sense of curiosity and inquisitiveness.
Thank you so much for the lesson . Could you please tell us which of the given options are correct here in this situation- I reached my my friend's home one hour ago.I am at my friend's home now. I am sitting alone. Nobody has come to attend me so far. Now my friend has just come to me . Which sentences are correct to say ? 1. Where were you for so long? 2. Where were you ? 3. Where had you been ? 4. Where have you been ? 5. Where had you been for so long? 6. Where have you been for so long?
In the given situation, the correct sentences to say would be: Where were you for so long? Where were you? These sentences are appropriate because you are asking about your friend's whereabouts during the time you were alone at their home. The other options are not as fitting for the context: Where had you been? - This implies a past action completed before another past action, but it doesn't fit well with the immediate situation of your friend arriving. Where have you been? - This suggests a more general inquiry about your friend's recent activities and might not capture the context of your waiting for them. Where had you been for so long? - Similar to option 3, it emphasizes a completed past action before another past action. Where have you been for so long? - While grammatically correct, it might sound a bit more accusatory or impatient than the situation warrants. It's a valid option but may convey a slightly different tone.
Hello Dear Teacher "This is intended for advance student" The above sentence is simple present passive or simple past passive or simple infinitive passive?
i think B is correct because there's duration of the action, but i also think A is correct because Rob will still living in the same house after he redecorated :(((( the second sentence with "HAD BEEN" means he no longer live in the same house..
It was my first day of class. I finally found the right room. The room was already full of students. On one side of the room, the students were speaking to each other in Spanish. The others were speaking Japanese and some were conversing in Arabic. It sounds like the United Nations. Some of the students, however, were sitting quietly by themselves. I chose an empty seat in the last row and sat down. In a few minutes, the teacher walked into the room and all the multilingual conversation stopped. I wonder if somebody could help me with the grammatical errors here!
Hi, I think your writing is great. I have only found a couple of things I would change. It was my first day of class. I finally found the right room. The room was already full of students. On one side of the room, the students were speaking to each other in Spanish. The others were speaking Japanese and some were conversing in Arabic. It SOUNDED like the United Nations. Some of the students, however, were sitting quietly by themselves. I chose an empty seat in the last row and sat down. AFTER a few minutes, the teacher walked into the room and all the multilingual conversation stopped. I hope that helps!
The sentence "The cat had been sleeping when its owner came home" does not necessarily imply that the sleeping was interrupted by the owner. Instead, it describes a past state or action (the cat sleeping) that was ongoing or continuous at a specific point in the past (when the owner came home). The use of the past perfect progressive tense ("had been sleeping") indicates that the cat was already in the state of sleeping before the owner came home. It doesn't explicitly state whether the sleeping was interrupted or not. It simply sets up the sequence of events: the cat was sleeping, and then its owner came home. Whether the cat continued sleeping after the owner's arrival is not specified by this sentence alone.
Hello Ma'am, Which tense should be used in the following sentence? Past perfect or past simple? > Teacher: Why were you absent for so long? Sam: I _____(had been/had gone/went) to a one week English Literature Workshop conducted by ELS.
@@oxfordenglishnowI believe that the past perfect emphasizes the completion of the action and the past simple needs a specific time indication to use it. So in this case the past perfect is the correct tense. Am I right??
When I came home,my sister was sleeping=I saw her sleeping When I came home,my sister had been sleeping=I didnt see her sleeping,is this the right difference between these two sentences above?
"was sleeping" means the action of sleeping was happening at the moment you arrived, so you likely saw it. "had been sleeping" means the action of sleeping happened before you arrived and may or may not have continued when you arrived, so you might not have seen it.
What I realized... Past continuous we can use to show that the first action necessarily took place during the second action, we don't care if it started earlier, and we can't specify the duration of the first action before the second action starts, even though it does. Past perfect continuous is used to show that the first action occurred before the second action, and possibly during and after the second action, and we can specify the duration of the first action before the beginning of the second. But I was confused by two examples. 1.: "I was eating all day so I wasn't hungy". Why can't I eat when I'm not hungry? We need to show that when I was eating all day I wasn't hungry and the past continuous doesn't seem to bother us, does it? 2: "She was painting the room when she was taken to hospital" and one of the meanings of past continuous is lost. Or was she taken to hospital together with the room? What do we need past perfect, past perfect continuous for? One grammatical tense begins to play the role of another. To diversify or simplify speech? And we can't use the prepositions by, since with past continuous. And the prepositions at, in, on with past perfect continuous. Right? Can we indicate the duration of an action, when we use past perfect?
Your observations are quite insightful, and you've touched upon some interesting points regarding the use of past continuous and past perfect continuous tenses. "I was eating all day so I wasn't hungry." In this case, the past continuous is used to describe an ongoing action (eating all day) that was happening at some point in the past. It doesn't necessarily mean you couldn't eat when you weren't hungry; rather, it emphasizes the continuous nature of the action. The focus here is on the duration of eating, and the contrast with not being hungry is just additional information. "She was painting the room when she was taken to the hospital." This sentence is a bit ambiguous and might benefit from clarification. It implies that she was painting the room when the action of being taken to the hospital occurred. If you want to convey a clearer sequence of events, you might say, "She had been painting the room when she was taken to the hospital." This brings in the past perfect continuous to emphasize the duration of the painting activity before the hospitalization. Regarding prepositions, your general observation is correct. Past continuous is often used with prepositions like "while" or "when," while past perfect continuous is commonly used with prepositions like "by," "since," "for," or "before." In the case of indicating the duration of an action, past perfect continuous is particularly useful. For example, "She had been studying for three hours before the exam." Here, the past perfect continuous helps express the duration of the studying activity leading up to the specific point in the past (the exam).
@@oxfordenglishnow, "I was eating all day so I wasn't hungry". Because of "so" we can say, when first action is the reason, second - the result. Wait, here isn't word "when", so this action can be at the same time and/or one by one. We don't know. So, why we can't say that to indicate the reason and the result? "I had been eating all day so wasn't hungry". We can say that the first act was MUST be before the second act and POSSIBLY during the second act. And supposedly "all day" is the duration of the first act before the second act. So I wasn't hungry the NEXT day, not the day I ate. Or does this logic only work when "before", "by" are used, but then why would Past Perfect Continuous be used here? And can we say that purely logically the sentence "She was painting the room when she was taken to the hospital" is not correct, because during the second short action the first long action is not performed, but people say so to simplify the sentence? I was just making a table of tenses for myself and looking for materials from all over the internet.
Or do I just need to memorize that for sentences with a reason (long action) in the past instead of past continuous, past perfect continuous is used as an exception, then "I was eating all day so wasn't hungry" is not correct, but "I was eating all day and wasn't hungry" is correct.
Hi, I disagree, he could be still living there in sentence B. A is wrong because the past continuous cannot hold the span of time with it, so we have to use the past perfect continuous. I hope that helps.
The sentence "We stopped by the house where my mother was living" is in the past tense, and it doesn't necessarily imply that your mother still lives there. The past continuous tense, indicated by "was living," is often used to describe an ongoing action or situation at a specific point in the past. In this case, it means that at the time of the visit, your mother was living in that house. The use of the past continuous tense doesn't provide information about the current situation. It simply describes the state of affairs at a particular moment in the past. To determine whether your mother still lives there, you would need additional context or information from the present. The sentence itself, as written, doesn't make any claims about the current status of your mother's residence.
B is the correct answer. The past continuous cannot hold the span of time with it, so we have to use the past perfect continuous. Also here we are emphasising an action that happened before another in the past. I hope that helps. 😊
![[Easy Japanese] Don’t Struggle to Memorize! You’ll Automatically Memorize Just by Listening :)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dUfRZws_ChM/mqdefault.jpg)
If you enjoyed this lesson could you do me a favour and HIT that like button on the video! Helps me a lot ❤ subscribe too so you don't miss the next lesson coming out! Thanks guys! 🙏🏻
❤
Hello Sarah. Nice to meet you again.
Thank you for the very useful lesson!
Thanks to your explanation, from now on I understand the difference between the past continuos tense and the past perfect continuous tense. This has been a confusing thing for long time for me.
Here is my reply to your question.
The correct answer is as follows:
Rob had been living in the same house for five years before he redecorated the sitting room.
See you soon.
Thank you for your kind words! Well done, You are correct! Good job!
Respected Ma'am, being undisputedly the greatest grammarian on this planet, you are earnestly entreated with folded hands to let me know which of the following options in the context would be the more appropriate -Question -The passengers of the bus ----(were sleeping/had been sleeping) when the accident happened.
The more appropriate option in this context is:
"The passengers of the bus were sleeping when the accident happened."
"Were sleeping" is used to describe an action that was ongoing at a specific point in the past, which fits the context of what the passengers were doing when the accident occurred.
Respected Ma'am, I do watch your videos religiously every day, because that you are the best of all grammarians across the globe admits no doubt.Ma,am,do please be kind enough to provide solution to the following Tense-based issue that different teachers have answered differently -Question --They reached the station.Then the train left.(Join the sentences using 'When '). My probable answers-(A) When they reached the station, the train left (B) When they had reached the station, the train left (The train left when they had reached the station.Ma,am, please let me know which options would be grammatically and semantically correct and which not.I keep awaiting your valued take on this with a growing sense of curiosity and inquisitiveness.
I am in sorriso MT Brazil,this teacher are awsome
Thank you for your kind words!
B is the correct answer.
That's right! Well done!
I have just got your UA-cam channel and from now on I will follow your program until i obtain something from your lesson.
Great news! Thank you!
Thanks a million for the clear explanation
My pleasure!
Beautiful sharing
Thank you so much 🙂
Thank you for telling the defference between past continuous tense and past perfect tense, dear teacher. 🙏 9:41
My pleasure 😇
Awesome Madam!
Thanks for the lessons .It meant a lot to me
You are very welcome
Thank you so much for the lesson .
Could you please tell us which of the given options are correct here in this situation-
I reached my my friend's home one hour ago.I am at my friend's home now. I am sitting alone. Nobody has come to attend me so far. Now my friend has just come to me . Which sentences are correct to say ?
1. Where were you for so long?
2. Where were you ?
3. Where had you been ?
4. Where have you been ?
5. Where had you been for so long?
6. Where have you been for so long?
In the given situation, the correct sentences to say would be:
Where were you for so long?
Where were you?
These sentences are appropriate because you are asking about your friend's whereabouts during the time you were alone at their home. The other options are not as fitting for the context:
Where had you been? - This implies a past action completed before another past action, but it doesn't fit well with the immediate situation of your friend arriving.
Where have you been? - This suggests a more general inquiry about your friend's recent activities and might not capture the context of your waiting for them.
Where had you been for so long? - Similar to option 3, it emphasizes a completed past action before another past action.
Where have you been for so long? - While grammatically correct, it might sound a bit more accusatory or impatient than the situation warrants. It's a valid option but may convey a slightly different tone.
@@oxfordenglishnow Very nicely explained ! Thank you so much !
Thank you for the lesson.
I have a question.
Can we say using the past simple:
We stoped by the house where my mother lived for see…. ?
My pleasure. We can say, « We stopped by the house where my mother lived to see her. »
I am really satisfied with this explantation mam thank u very much for ur help
Glad to hear that
Thank you great teacher
You are very welcome
Thank you very informative.😍
Glad it was helpful!
Oh my gosh!! 😭😭 You're our English Godesse keep up the good work!!!
Thank you! 😃. Such kind words!
excellent explanation
Glad you liked it!
Similarly, please explain the difference between present perfect and past perfect tense in English.
That is a great idea. I will use it for a future video. Thanks ❤️
Thank you Mam you help me a lot to understand.
It's my pleasure
A is correct answer, because we have a specific time in the past ''for five years'' witch mean it's past continuous.
Ah sorry no it is B because the past continuous cannot hold a span of time with for or since.
Well explained thank you very much indeed for your efforts.
You are welcome!
Great
Thanks!
Hello Dear Teacher
"This is intended for advance student"
The above sentence is simple present passive or simple past passive or simple infinitive passive?
The given sentence is in the simple present passive voice.
B is the correct answer, Ma'm.,,👍
Right answer
Hello amazing explanation. Love from hyderabad
So nice of you
Thanks
My pleasure 😇
i think B is correct because there's duration of the action, but i also think A is correct because Rob will still living in the same house after he redecorated :(((( the second sentence with "HAD BEEN" means he no longer live in the same house..
B is correct because the past continuous cannot hold a span of time with for or since. I hope that helps! 😊
Thank u so much mam. It helped me a lot. Respect from india
Most welcome!
It was my first day of class. I finally found the right room. The room was already full of students. On one side of the room, the students were speaking to each other in Spanish. The others were speaking Japanese and some were conversing in Arabic. It sounds like the United Nations. Some of the students, however, were sitting quietly by themselves. I chose an empty seat in the last row and sat down. In a few minutes, the teacher walked into the room and all the multilingual conversation stopped.
I wonder if somebody could help me with the grammatical errors here!
Hi, I think your writing is great. I have only found a couple of things I would change.
It was my first day of class. I finally found the right room. The room was already full of students. On one side of the room, the students were speaking to each other in Spanish. The others were speaking Japanese and some were conversing in Arabic. It SOUNDED like the United Nations. Some of the students, however, were sitting quietly by themselves. I chose an empty seat in the last row and sat down. AFTER a few minutes, the teacher walked into the room and all the multilingual conversation stopped.
I hope that helps!
@@oxfordenglishnow Thanks a lot!
I really appreciate your help!!
Thank you so much
You're most welcome
Hello: I`m not very sure but I mean that answer A is right, because he continues to live in the house.
Ah sorry no it is B because the past continuous cannot hold a span of time with for or since.
Very clear explanation thanks:))
You are welcome!
Hello from Brazil
Hello to Brazil !
B is correct.
That's correct. Well done!
in the sentence "The cat had been sleeping when its owner came home" does the sentence imply that the sleeping was interrupted by the owner or not ?
The sentence "The cat had been sleeping when its owner came home" does not necessarily imply that the sleeping was interrupted by the owner. Instead, it describes a past state or action (the cat sleeping) that was ongoing or continuous at a specific point in the past (when the owner came home).
The use of the past perfect progressive tense ("had been sleeping") indicates that the cat was already in the state of sleeping before the owner came home. It doesn't explicitly state whether the sleeping was interrupted or not. It simply sets up the sequence of events: the cat was sleeping, and then its owner came home. Whether the cat continued sleeping after the owner's arrival is not specified by this sentence alone.
Thank you madam🎉
My pleasure!
thanks a lot
My pleasure!
Hello Ma'am, Which tense should be used in the following sentence? Past perfect or past simple?
> Teacher: Why were you absent for so long?
Sam: I _____(had been/had gone/went) to a one week English Literature Workshop conducted by ELS.
Went. Completed activity in the past. I hope that helps!
@@oxfordenglishnow Thankyou ma'am
@@oxfordenglishnowI believe that the past perfect emphasizes the completion of the action and the past simple needs a specific time indication to use it. So in this case the past perfect is the correct tense. Am I right??
When I came home,my sister was sleeping=I saw her sleeping
When I came home,my sister had been sleeping=I didnt see her sleeping,is this the right difference between these two sentences above?
"was sleeping" means the action of sleeping was happening at the moment you arrived, so you likely saw it.
"had been sleeping" means the action of sleeping happened before you arrived and may or may not have continued when you arrived, so you might not have seen it.
The second one is the right one because there are two actions.
Correct! well done!
Long time no see. Welcome back 🔙
I know, sorry. I will try to be more consistent!
@@oxfordenglishnow been your subscriber for more than 4 years. Thanks for all your quality contents.
What I realized...
Past continuous we can use to show that the first action necessarily took place during the second action, we don't care if it started earlier, and we can't specify the duration of the first action before the second action starts, even though it does.
Past perfect continuous is used to show that the first action occurred before the second action, and possibly during and after the second action, and we can specify the duration of the first action before the beginning of the second.
But I was confused by two examples.
1.: "I was eating all day so I wasn't hungy". Why can't I eat when I'm not hungry? We need to show that when I was eating all day I wasn't hungry and the past continuous doesn't seem to bother us, does it?
2: "She was painting the room when she was taken to hospital" and one of the meanings of past continuous is lost. Or was she taken to hospital together with the room? What do we need past perfect, past perfect continuous for? One grammatical tense begins to play the role of another. To diversify or simplify speech?
And we can't use the prepositions by, since with past continuous. And the prepositions at, in, on with past perfect continuous. Right?
Can we indicate the duration of an action, when we use past perfect?
Your observations are quite insightful, and you've touched upon some interesting points regarding the use of past continuous and past perfect continuous tenses.
"I was eating all day so I wasn't hungry." In this case, the past continuous is used to describe an ongoing action (eating all day) that was happening at some point in the past. It doesn't necessarily mean you couldn't eat when you weren't hungry; rather, it emphasizes the continuous nature of the action. The focus here is on the duration of eating, and the contrast with not being hungry is just additional information.
"She was painting the room when she was taken to the hospital." This sentence is a bit ambiguous and might benefit from clarification. It implies that she was painting the room when the action of being taken to the hospital occurred. If you want to convey a clearer sequence of events, you might say, "She had been painting the room when she was taken to the hospital." This brings in the past perfect continuous to emphasize the duration of the painting activity before the hospitalization.
Regarding prepositions, your general observation is correct. Past continuous is often used with prepositions like "while" or "when," while past perfect continuous is commonly used with prepositions like "by," "since," "for," or "before."
In the case of indicating the duration of an action, past perfect continuous is particularly useful. For example, "She had been studying for three hours before the exam." Here, the past perfect continuous helps express the duration of the studying activity leading up to the specific point in the past (the exam).
@@oxfordenglishnow, "I was eating all day so I wasn't hungry". Because of "so" we can say, when first action is the reason, second - the result. Wait, here isn't word "when", so this action can be at the same time and/or one by one. We don't know. So, why we can't say that to indicate the reason and the result?
"I had been eating all day so wasn't hungry". We can say that the first act was MUST be before the second act and POSSIBLY during the second act. And supposedly "all day" is the duration of the first act before the second act. So I wasn't hungry the NEXT day, not the day I ate. Or does this logic only work when "before", "by" are used, but then why would Past Perfect Continuous be used here?
And can we say that purely logically the sentence "She was painting the room when she was taken to the hospital" is not correct, because during the second short action the first long action is not performed, but people say so to simplify the sentence?
I was just making a table of tenses for myself and looking for materials from all over the internet.
Or do I just need to memorize that for sentences with a reason (long action) in the past instead of past continuous, past perfect continuous is used as an exception, then "I was eating all day so wasn't hungry" is not correct, but "I was eating all day and wasn't hungry" is correct.
Good
Thanks
Hello
It was raining when i left the house....... It had been raining when I left the house
Hi, 2 good sentences. The first shows that it is still raining, the second that it is no longer raining. 😊
In my eyes sentence B indicates that he doesn't live here anymore. Sentence A highlights the time before refurbishment. He may still live here.
Hi, I disagree, he could be still living there in sentence B. A is wrong because the past continuous cannot hold the span of time with it, so we have to use the past perfect continuous. I hope that helps.
Rob had been living in the same house for five years before he redecorated the sitting room.
Correct! Well done!
B is the correct answer
That's correct. Well done!
❤❤❤❤❤
Thank you 🙏🏻
"B" is correct
That's correct! Well done!
I can't understand the example: We stopped by the house where my mother was living....
Why do you say that mum still lives there if it is past tense?
....where my mother was living....where=means her place. So she is still living there😊
The sentence "We stopped by the house where my mother was living" is in the past tense, and it doesn't necessarily imply that your mother still lives there. The past continuous tense, indicated by "was living," is often used to describe an ongoing action or situation at a specific point in the past. In this case, it means that at the time of the visit, your mother was living in that house.
The use of the past continuous tense doesn't provide information about the current situation. It simply describes the state of affairs at a particular moment in the past. To determine whether your mother still lives there, you would need additional context or information from the present. The sentence itself, as written, doesn't make any claims about the current status of your mother's residence.
@@oxfordenglishnow Thank you
B:rob had lived for 5 years then he stopped living then he ridecorated the room
Right my explanation?
Correct! Well done!
It's B the answer
Correct! Well done!
B
Correct. Well done!
Hi 😊😊😊❤❤❤
Hi! 😊
both correct🙄😅
B is the correct answer. The past continuous cannot hold the span of time with it, so we have to use the past perfect continuous. Also here we are emphasising an action that happened before another in the past. I hope that helps. 😊
Good
Thanks
B
Correct! well done!
B
Correct! Well done!