Anirban Bandyopadhyay - Quantum Physics of Consciousness

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 252

  • @piyush.pranjal86
    @piyush.pranjal86 11 місяців тому +24

    Lucky to have worked with Dr. Bandyopadhyay on a small project. I learned so much from him.

  • @RediffLallantop
    @RediffLallantop Рік тому +78

    Passion in his eyes while trying to convince us through Robert is enormous 😊

    • @muralimohan3876
      @muralimohan3876 Рік тому +4

      Passion as well as the excitement in his eyes and body language 👍

    • @sivaprasadkodukula7999
      @sivaprasadkodukula7999 Рік тому

      Thresh hold time is an important aspect of decoherence and is related to space time and it's curvature (nothing but gravity).for me it seems that he and his team experimentally achieved the threshold time which is important for Orch-OR..But Orch-OR is not sufficient to explain this neural phenomenon that plays a role inthe emergence consciousness.Film theory can explain further deviating from Diosi-penrose equation in a different perspective.

  • @sugatasenmazumdar7704
    @sugatasenmazumdar7704 Рік тому +16

    This man is stupendous. His eyes light up when he explains so passionately ❤❤❤👏👏👏👏

  • @beatsntoons
    @beatsntoons Рік тому +52

    This is a mind-blowing interview. What a unique take on neuroscience.

  • @ximono
    @ximono Рік тому +39

    I like how both Roger Penrose and Anirban Bandyopadhyay use music as a metaphor for what goes on at the quantum level in the brain. Symphony, harmony, singing, rhythm.

    • @michael-4k4000
      @michael-4k4000 Рік тому

      He needs to have Roger on the channel....

    • @movementofstillness
      @movementofstillness Рік тому +8

      what's interesting is its probably not a metaphor. Ancient indians had always maintained that everything in a universe is symphony of vibrations

    • @ALavin-en1kr
      @ALavin-en1kr 11 місяців тому +2

      Ancient Greek philosopher Parmenides described a stone as frozen music. The Music of the Spheres theory has been dismissed by modern philosophy. In Yoga philosophy the Chakras (centers along the spine) make music in humans and in the universe according to Yoga science which can be heard in deep concentration. Modern science is benighted and limited in its range. It is good with what is empirical and easily accessed it is clueless on the fundamentals of life and nature.

    • @Mhmhind
      @Mhmhind 11 місяців тому +1

      Everything is Frequency and vibration in this universe.

    • @djtan3313
      @djtan3313 11 місяців тому

      @@ALavin-en1krThis is good comment.

  • @karaokevallabh2815
    @karaokevallabh2815 11 місяців тому +2

    13:11 " that purposeful world unravels.." Scientist Anirban Bandopadhyay - you are a yogi ☺️

  • @karlyohe6379
    @karlyohe6379 Рік тому +71

    Very exciting work by this scientist. I agree with him that it is a bad idea to focus only on the membrane in trying to understand how the brain works or in trying to mimic it. Proponents of this are treating the nerve cell as if it were a black box whose inner-workings are fixed and, therefore, whose outputs can be predicted with 100% certainty given certain inputs. But the neuron is not a C++ object, and I believe it is extremely likely that the same input can lead to different outputs depending on what happens inside the neuron. Also, anyone betting against Sir Penrose had better be getting really good odds.

    • @aaronarmijo3626
      @aaronarmijo3626 Рік тому +3

      Listen to this man! What an expert!

    • @ximono
      @ximono Рік тому +4

      "the neuron is not a C++ object" 😆 Nor is it a Lisp function.

    • @TheuniverseInQM
      @TheuniverseInQM Рік тому

      This btch is saying that he is write not others😂😂

    • @michael-4k4000
      @michael-4k4000 Рік тому +1

      This man needs a you know what......

    • @Dashman100
      @Dashman100 Рік тому

      @@aaronarmijo3626 yes

  • @Forever._.curious..
    @Forever._.curious.. Рік тому +7

    That enthusiasm is priceless

  • @michaelsage6649
    @michaelsage6649 Рік тому +13

    What an astonishing interview! 🎵🎼🎶🎵

  • @purnendumitravlogs6207
    @purnendumitravlogs6207 Рік тому +46

    Feel proud of Anirban Bandyopadhya. Very exciting field of research indeed. Will it help understand spiritual school of thoughts? Hope so. All best wishes and salute to him 🙏

    • @Ekam-Sat
      @Ekam-Sat Рік тому +4

      Ekam Sat… but since it is not good to be alone… ♥️

    • @stevo7220
      @stevo7220 Рік тому

      Spiritual school of thoughts ?

    • @OpiumR7
      @OpiumR7 11 місяців тому +2

      ​@@stevo7220 i think he is talking about vedantic school of thought.

    • @Soham216
      @Soham216 11 місяців тому +1

      @@stevo7220advaita vedant , kashmiri shaivism etc

    • @thearjunauvach280
      @thearjunauvach280 10 місяців тому

      Samkhaya darshana it is

  • @bretnetherton9273
    @bretnetherton9273 Рік тому +22

    Awareness is known by awareness alone.

  • @blijebij
    @blijebij Рік тому +13

    Interesting talk, i love this man's passion for his work. He really enjoys it.

  • @dineshkumarsnair7964
    @dineshkumarsnair7964 Рік тому +9

    What a wonderful interaction.. I was spellbound with this conversation.. One of the finest Episode s from CTT.. 🙏

    • @michael-4k4000
      @michael-4k4000 Рік тому +1

      This man is on to something.... let's all stay in touch and follow up with this fine gentlemen....

  • @missh1774
    @missh1774 Рік тому +9

    Amazing 💛 would it be like particular sets of Vedic harmonics? Love it "........and enter clock..."

  • @OfficialGOD
    @OfficialGOD Рік тому +16

    love Anirban's work! hope he gets some recognition for his artificial brain

  • @periurban
    @periurban 11 місяців тому +3

    Wow! This wonderful fellow is so much better at communicating the ideas of quantum consciousness than either Penrose or Hameroff. His enthusiasm shines!

  • @aaronarmijo3626
    @aaronarmijo3626 Рік тому +5

    Listen to this man. What an expert!

  • @amritsharma5373
    @amritsharma5373 8 місяців тому +1

    Very interesting observation.
    Heard of it earlier from Dr. Penrose.

  • @abhisheksingh1143
    @abhisheksingh1143 Рік тому +9

    love his passion❤

  • @sonarbangla8711
    @sonarbangla8711 Рік тому +13

    Anirban's work seems interesting, but he admits microtubules' role in consciousness is long way down the track. How microtubules achieve coherence in its function as QC function, is the key to unlocking the mysteries of consciousness. His knowledge of everything vibrating like strings in the entire universe is enlightening.

  • @LeviAllen
    @LeviAllen Рік тому +9

    You need a longer format with this gentleman!!!

  • @dineshed
    @dineshed 11 місяців тому +2

    This Guy's passion to tell and convey is simply amazing....

  • @stellarwind1946
    @stellarwind1946 Рік тому +6

    I question why neuroscientists would dispute the idea of quantum physics influencing consciousness when we know things going on at the quantum level can effect the brain significantly.
    One example is reactive oxygen species (that contain an unpaired electron), which are believed to play a major role in the development of Alzheimer’s and other forms of dementia.

  • @theotormon
    @theotormon Рік тому +5

    I love this viewpoint. It showcases the complexity and beauty of nature.

  • @Kinging76
    @Kinging76 Рік тому +6

    very intense, huge information packed in a few min

  • @tuhinmajumder6680
    @tuhinmajumder6680 Рік тому +3

    Great work by Anirban.. Thanks a lot for this wonderful video.

  • @rickcoyne7845
    @rickcoyne7845 Рік тому +36

    This all seems to make good sense. This is so Fascinating. Can you do a much longer video about this while including Roger and Stuart ? Thank you for another great video>

    • @ximono
      @ximono Рік тому +1

      I think this was shot at the same place as one of his interviews with Roger Penrose. I suppose it's from an episode on the topic.

  • @DoubleRaven00
    @DoubleRaven00 Рік тому +4

    Amazing! One of the best interviews in the series.

  • @patientson
    @patientson Рік тому +5

    Colossians 3:16 (Put on a new self) Once you understand this sentence, the likelihood you can replicate the subject matter you speak about right here doubles, including that of your insight and strength/power

  • @dr.satishsharma1362
    @dr.satishsharma1362 Рік тому +4

    Excellent.... thanks 🙏.

  • @catbangs276
    @catbangs276 Рік тому +17

    This is fascinating! If it's true that neuroscience primarily looks at the outer layers of the brain and ignores the inner, bulk of the brain, where 'the music" happens, then we need a new science that goes deeper into the brain.

  • @mutombo10
    @mutombo10 Рік тому +3

    great interview Thank you

  • @Nabanitacg
    @Nabanitacg Рік тому +3

    Every singke being is unique ! How amazing is that!

  • @duongkstn
    @duongkstn 6 місяців тому +1

    Energetic scientist. love it 😤

  • @eksffa
    @eksffa Рік тому +12

    “Orch-OR theory is taking the whole world of neuroscience 100 years ahead of its current system” 👍

  • @erebology
    @erebology Рік тому +3

    Astounding!

  • @erawanpencil
    @erawanpencil Рік тому +6

    Robert is conflating 'consciousnesses' here: computational information processing and that most fundamental sense of awareness are distinguished in OrchOR. Much of the brain's activity may indeed be classical/non-quantum, and much of it may be computational, no different than a computer. But fundamental awareness, the sense of subjectivity, exists before and without the need for computation, hence yes, liver cells have a form of consciousness, and even subatomic particles spontaneously collapsing due to gravity have proto-consciousness. I honestly don't think Robert made an effort to read Penrose's books or the studies and papers they've put out, it's evident from the questions he's asked about it over the years.

  • @indranilpaul6253
    @indranilpaul6253 11 місяців тому

    Its a sense enhancing discussion...thank u Mr Bandyopadhyay...great work...take my gratitude

  • @DouglasVoigt-tu3xb
    @DouglasVoigt-tu3xb 10 місяців тому +2

    I think closer to truth.

  • @r2c3
    @r2c3 Рік тому +6

    3:30 can a molecule change its frequency...frequencies are usually used to identify molecules from one another 🤔

    • @mikepatnode4407
      @mikepatnode4407 Рік тому +1

      MT's are able to extend themselves by the additions of a and b tublin proteins. The mt has a canter to it and also has maps, or different proteins, that may attach the tublin to encrypt different gingles, let's say. They are used for harmonic coding to message by frequency and to storing memories in frequencies. representing feelings. Different types of cells use different scales and or frequencies to encode memories of music pictures colors taste s, etc.

    • @r2c3
      @r2c3 Рік тому

      @@mikepatnode4407 MT's seem to extend in a complex system and not in isolation... no such structures have been observed separate from biological systems...

  • @Love369A
    @Love369A 2 місяці тому +1

    that's is the closest this channel has ever made to understand the bio-quantic-mechanism of individual consciousness!!!!!!! I am so happy now... a little bit more to discover
    the secret of how the universe works and become aware of itself :)

  • @michaelbartlett6864
    @michaelbartlett6864 Рік тому +4

    It's pretty clear by the expression on his face at the end of this video that Robert didn't understand anything Anirban was saying!

  • @sukadeva108
    @sukadeva108 10 місяців тому +1

    I have been believing for quite sometime that consciousness of particular perception transmitted through specific imaginary channels before listening to this podcast. Wet, warm and noisy spatial dynamics may or may not hampered the interference of neuronal tubules synchronic rhythm. In vivo state,neurotransmitters’ biomolecule sure might have behaved more than physical laws of pull and push. Neuro-chemical transmitters does not( hopefully) synthesise emotion but emotion make changes in the chemical assortment. Very important crucial finding in the study of brain- consciousness interaction. Thank 🙏🏾

  • @sanjibkarjee7998
    @sanjibkarjee7998 11 місяців тому

    Pranam a lots

  • @hectorreyes2455
    @hectorreyes2455 Рік тому +1

    Kindly post with English subtitles

  • @OKAMIKNIGHTS
    @OKAMIKNIGHTS Рік тому +1

    Im a researcher in quantum gravity and would love to talk to both of these guys, i think we all would have a great conversation. Electrons are fundamental to my research.

  • @JaneB1
    @JaneB1 11 місяців тому +1

    Very interesting. Another system of signaling in body is also being researched. Photons move through fascia, connective tissue, and extra cellular "goop" at the speed of light. A researcher friend was telling me about this. If anyone is interested, I will see about getting citations.

  • @Goldielockkk
    @Goldielockkk Рік тому +3

    That's how music is made🙌🙏

  • @TheWoody296
    @TheWoody296 Рік тому +3

    We must work together as one world 🌎.

  • @ReginaJune
    @ReginaJune Рік тому +3

    11:17 this all kind of how psychiatric medications work/don’t achieve their goals right?

  • @dinobandhudutta8056
    @dinobandhudutta8056 Рік тому +1

    Amazing researchers.👍👍

  • @Resmith18SR
    @Resmith18SR Рік тому +9

    Our brains are all unique like our fingerprints, no two are exactly the same.

    • @Resmith18SR
      @Resmith18SR Рік тому +1

      @@dianneforit5409 Prove that Dianne.

    • @ebog4841
      @ebog4841 Рік тому

      he is you. you are him. you are an AI. Please, you must wake up.

    • @Balkehianji
      @Balkehianji 11 місяців тому

      @@ebog4841tf😂

  • @TheTroofSayer
    @TheTroofSayer Рік тому +2

    Interesting interview. Robert suggests reasons why QM is rejected among physicists & neuroscientists: 1. We already know the mechanisms, like action-potentials of neurons, no need for QM; 2. Warm, wet environments (decoherence) & all that. I have one very good reason for continuing to look to QM, and that is entropy. So much complexity, so much to coordinate, so many things that can go wrong - but I'm just an engineer, what do I know? Anirban's thesis, though, seems very conjectural. I'd like him to be more specific, expressing the principles within an axiomatic framework. I didn't know that an electron, for example, can apportion itself across the neural network. That's interesting, adds a new take on what it means to be "entangled".

    • @sanjibchakraborty313
      @sanjibchakraborty313 11 місяців тому

      Kindly share the *full-form of QM* in the given context. Is it "Quantum-Mechanics or something else"?

  • @doctorchirag
    @doctorchirag 11 місяців тому +1

    Is anyone familiar with the work of Dr Alexis Carrel? He tried to point out this fallacy of neuroscience decades ago. He proposed that neuroscience got it all wrong to begin with, when they decided to address brain as the “thinking organ”. Brain is so much more than circuits while at the same time thinking and processing information is carried out simultaneously by multiple organs of the body, even the organs where conventional “neurons” haven’t been demonstrated yet.

  • @habs94
    @habs94 11 місяців тому

    Thank you for this precious info

  • @neverend9302
    @neverend9302 Рік тому +2

    This needs pictures so bad. For instance like the interviewer said, there is this spike activation, and my understanding is that Anirban is saying this spike is harmonically rich rather than just 2-3 dimensions it is a whole series of waves overtones (does a wave function have over tones??) Are there any studies on chaining these interactions to produce different results that would map to the internal biology? Or do proteins fold differently into particular states depending on the harmonic content? It seems that on large areas there are delta, beta waves etc I wish I knew more..

  • @jalalkhosravi6458
    @jalalkhosravi6458 Рік тому

    Fantastic insides

  • @godisinfinity
    @godisinfinity Рік тому +3

    Very interesting! 🤔 I personally think it’s closer to truth 😉

  • @seangilmore6695
    @seangilmore6695 Рік тому +1

    It sounds as if neurons are sensitive to the symphony they are immersed in while being stable enough to express this symphony reliably. Much like a "Pure Function" (the same input produces the same output with no side-effects or mutations). All that while being able to adapt itself when encountering the novel. Like a function that can add a new data type "on the fly".

  • @sivaprasadkodukula7999
    @sivaprasadkodukula7999 Рік тому +1

    Thresh hold time is an important aspect of decoherence and is related to space time and it's curvature (nothing but gravity).for me it seems that he and his team experimentally achieved the threshold time(knowingly or unknowingly)which is important for Orch-OR..But Orch-OR is not sufficient to explain this neural phenomenon that plays a role inthe emergence of consciousness. Film theory can explain further deviating from Diosi-penrose equation in a different perspective.

  • @Stegosaurus12345
    @Stegosaurus12345 Рік тому +3

    If the brain taps into quantum effects, is there a chance that it can influence wave function collapse?

  • @t.j.payeur5331
    @t.j.payeur5331 Рік тому +11

    I like the theory that anesthesia works by interfering with quantum tunneling...

    • @Ekam-Sat
      @Ekam-Sat Рік тому +5

      Smart man. Who knows. Maybe the purpose of Life is Love. Genesis 2:18.

    • @punitshirodkar
      @punitshirodkar Рік тому +1

      @@Ekam-Sat it is for some and not for others. Both are necessary until the point where a single being is able to hold its value in absolute manner from birth itself. Until then, this reality, this life will keep on evolving. At the end, when everything has become truly one and has transcended to the highest level of existence in all the infinite manners possible, wouldn't we get bored all alone? If you apply this thought to cellular level(some scientists also suggest some fundamental level of consciousness exists in everything), this makes cancer cells devoid of love and hungry for power without the value of mortality which causes all kinds of trouble.

  • @padmanabhaswamy
    @padmanabhaswamy 11 місяців тому +1

    A sound coming from an individual is a, play of different components. But, why is it different, in different individuals? who decides on the difference? Is it just string of neurons, and other parts constituting the body? Isn't the, neurons, and cells, of the physical body, also, present in the body of a, dead individual? Why is that individual dead? Is there something more that make that body alive? What is that something more? ... Endless questions. The last why, exists. Find it.

  • @carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523

    Please Dr Kuhn, tell me, you spoke with this guy in person. What it is? Arrogance, Ignorance? Single mindedness ? Or just the obscure desire that things are more complicated than what they really are?

  • @KKPR533
    @KKPR533 11 місяців тому

    DDr anirban is really passionate about his work

  • @patientson
    @patientson Рік тому +3

    I can find truth with its implementation in every religious text and cultures. Truth with simple implementations but the arduous task in the journey is that most human being wont like. Imagine if a pregnant woman first get the pain of what would happen in her 9 month during labour, will she still accept man's best proposal to live and deliver her first child?

  • @adamdolson2525
    @adamdolson2525 Рік тому +1

    Bright guy!

  • @angelotuteao6758
    @angelotuteao6758 Рік тому +2

    Waiting for CTTT to interview Bernardo Kastrup and/or Donald Hoffman….

  • @hakanguzelgoz2269
    @hakanguzelgoz2269 Рік тому +3

    Great video. I would give him the Nobel just feeling his passion.👌🙏 Universal consciousness (our true nature) seems to have connections with quantum, or put in other words, consciousness plays using some quantum fields :)

    • @hildejutta1625
      @hildejutta1625 7 місяців тому

      "Consciousness IS the pianist" (HJL)

  • @PradipKGogoi
    @PradipKGogoi Рік тому

    Penrose also tried to explain the link between quantum physics and consciousness.This interview is also very interesting.

  • @Goldielockkk
    @Goldielockkk Рік тому +2

    Holy brain 🙌

  • @vyramdrago8217
    @vyramdrago8217 Рік тому +1

    Never forget that Hameroff and Penrose originally suggested that synchronous firing of neurons requires an outside operator. Consciousness is possessed by some thing, operating the brain, but that thing which possesses conscious awareness is not the brain itself. This will become clear when a pivotal discovery demonstrates consciousness' ability to exist outside the structure of the brain, a discovery already made. Will keep you posted, as the next couple of years will see this discovery come to light, although it has already made its way into the public domain.

  • @balaji-kartha
    @balaji-kartha Рік тому

    Now that is interesting. Of course there is a physical reason for consciousness! Wonderful

    • @lynnmckenna9934
      @lynnmckenna9934 Рік тому

      Just like a TV set is the physical “reason” we can watch a TV show.

  • @travissink5094
    @travissink5094 Рік тому +1

    How am I supposed to take this seriously when the camera is on full time auto pan, as though I'm supposed to assume that all my lcd experience is just now bubbling to the surface?

  • @lockk132
    @lockk132 Рік тому

    I've often thought on consciousness. I haven't come up with any answer .I have come up with a very basic equation.If I ask if a neuron is conscious ,as in self aware and I find the answer as no ,then I give the neuron a zero value.Very basic maths then shows that 0+0=0,0×0=0....So doesn't that show intrinsically a neuron is a conduit but not the source of consciousness?

  • @tedgrant2
    @tedgrant2 Рік тому +4

    People like to talk about the mystery of "consciousness".
    But they never talk about "unconsciousness".
    Yet it is a very common phenomenon.

    • @joshkeeling82
      @joshkeeling82 Рік тому +3

      Unconsciousness isn't a thing. It doesn't exist. And it's not the opposite of consciousness, because non-existence isn't a thing.

    • @tedgrant2
      @tedgrant2 Рік тому

      @@joshkeeling82
      But according to my dictionary, unconsciousness is a noun.
      (a noun is a thing) and it gives this example of the use of the word...
      "I was roused from unconsciousness by the alarm clock".

    • @MarineBoy42
      @MarineBoy42 Рік тому +1

      'Sleep' is a lower state of consciousness from which you can be roused. 'Unconsciousness' is a mental state from which you cannot be roused to consciousness.

    • @tedgrant2
      @tedgrant2 Рік тому

      @@MarineBoy42
      When I had a general anaesthetic, I was unconscious.
      I was very pleased to wake up in the recovery room.
      Sometimes, patients do not wake up.

    • @tedgrant2
      @tedgrant2 Рік тому

      @@MarineBoy42
      Unconsciousness is a gift from God.
      It usually stops us from drinking too much alcohol.
      Sadly, it doesn't always work, resulting in the Big Sleep.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 Рік тому

    the physical brain can make a classical representation / awareness of quantum mind / consciousness?

  • @anirudhadhote
    @anirudhadhote Рік тому

    Hi Sir, I have a simple question. Inside a factory at the end of the shift a supervisor and his co-worker are counting the produced objects, the objects are approximately the size of a tennis ball. It is their daily routine,the worker counts the objects as he takes it from the production lot and puts it inside a bag. The role of the supervisor is to keep watch so that there is no mistake while counting. One fine day, before starting the counting process, the supervisor looks at the lot and writes down some random three digit number as quantity of the produced items, in short he assumes that the actual quantity would probably match with that number. Now the question is what are the chances of that actual quantity matching exactly with that random number?

  • @cmeimgee
    @cmeimgee Рік тому

    Amazing

  • @tjentalman
    @tjentalman 11 місяців тому

    Maybe evidence of the microtubule quantum consciousness thing, but to me, as someone who has studied the brain, it seems way more likely (and less wild) the unique integration of microtubules and the resonance are facilitating neuroplasticity/synchronized functioning/more diverse reactions from neurons and networks from different inputs/ion channel functioning/more possibilities rather than consciousness

  • @RajWre3
    @RajWre3 11 місяців тому

    I have a hard time understanding how quantum mechanics of the microtubule relate to consciousness?
    Brain activity, 100% .
    different compositions of the mind based on various imput/output.
    Is he using the terms "conscioususness" and "mind" interchangeably?

  • @sangsp2560
    @sangsp2560 Рік тому

    I want to hear that music..though somehow I feel like I have heard it before 😢

  • @elixiroflife9636
    @elixiroflife9636 11 місяців тому

    What quantum theory tells about death and afterlife?

  • @avishekmukhopadhyay6086
    @avishekmukhopadhyay6086 11 місяців тому +1

    Glad to see replica of Einstein !

  • @Forever._.curious..
    @Forever._.curious.. Рік тому +1

    He's definately a gd and pure scientist

  • @sasidharanc7632
    @sasidharanc7632 11 місяців тому

    Is peace, harmoni, love &joy between neucleic dna &mitochondrial dna can improve each cell function simultaneously improve Anti-aging, Anti-disease &Anti-inflamation.

  • @mickshaw555
    @mickshaw555 Рік тому +2

    Hence, can it be infered that consciousness is non-local, as David Chalmers is implying?

    • @godisinfinity
      @godisinfinity Рік тому

      Locality is kind of relative. I would say it’s more like that the brain is leaving a permanent fingerprint in the substance of reality or something even like what a black hole is for the space time continuum. Through existence period of the body in the reality this fingerprint is more or less local. “Local” has different range for differently enlightened individuals, means how deep and far can he/she spread its conciseness into substance of existence. Getting practically closer to truth . How far your thoughts can reach, this will also align to chalmers suggestion that consciousness is available in all living matter or possibly even non living one, but in different quantities . I think was him suggesting that. Anyway question is what happens after body loses its structure? Locality of consciousness “completely” disappears? Are we going to find it out one day ?

    • @mickshaw555
      @mickshaw555 Рік тому

      @@godisinfinity 👍

  • @aliijazseher
    @aliijazseher 10 місяців тому

    بہت خوب

  • @ripleyfilms8561
    @ripleyfilms8561 Рік тому

    a composite of production of time if you know which to go to threw space if you know 1 correct everytime confused isn't or is fun you can be perfect everytime reality accepts quantum physics

  • @rkowlagi
    @rkowlagi Рік тому +1

    Kuhn’s interviews are always very exciting ❤

  • @JavGaracia
    @JavGaracia 11 місяців тому

    This concept could form mind weapons to damage masses microtubulars and frequency through Emf weapons and scalar mapping and cloud ssedding weather warfare and harp and microwave towers. Affecting people's moods and mindset.

  • @jamesruscheinski8602
    @jamesruscheinski8602 Рік тому

    maybe physical brain has awareness of quantum consciousness? action potentials of energy in brain have awareness of quantum energy in mind / consciousness?

  • @sivaprasadkodukula7999
    @sivaprasadkodukula7999 Рік тому

    His view is completely different.He may be wrong . He told neurons will be different for different brain. Means, structure of neuron differs from brain to brain. Structure of electron will not change with atoms. No.of electrons change. Process of information changes with quantum bits which depends on interaction of neurons and the frequency created by their interaction...

  • @boonraypipatchol7295
    @boonraypipatchol7295 Рік тому +1

    Quantum information, Quantum entanglement,
    Are, fundamental, underlying of Reality.
    Quantum Mind emerge, Quantum Body emerge,
    Mind and Body entanglement,.. Consciousness emerge.
    Spacetime emerge, Mathematics Emerge, Holographic principal.

  • @BILLY-px3hw
    @BILLY-px3hw Рік тому

    Anirban Bandyopadhyay's microtubules are firing differently than mine, for sure

    • @chemicalsurrealist
      @chemicalsurrealist Рік тому

      They are same. But maps of synapses, neural networks differ.

  • @Garaboncnok
    @Garaboncnok Рік тому

    A new science of consciousness should have to explain "anomalous" experiences, the so-called paranormal, such as unusual information exchange in altered states of consciousness, psi, poltergeist, manifestations, etc. I don't see a hint here, not elsewhere, perhaps in Dean Radin's work.

  • @VenusLover17
    @VenusLover17 Рік тому

    ❤❤

  • @space-time-somdeep
    @space-time-somdeep Рік тому

  • @longcastle4863
    @longcastle4863 Рік тому +6

    Microtubules are like Descartes’ pineal gland.

  • @ripleyfilms8561
    @ripleyfilms8561 Рік тому

    i am principal at harvard and top grad aj king & i know all time correct science and religion and do give 2 rules why how quantum exsists forevor why neurons in your head only it