The main thing that modern shooters lack is grit and seriousness. Yes we are all playing these games for fun but when you have ridiculously cheesy, unrealistic, bright, colourful player models/skins, the games immersion is completely destroyed. Skins are great as they give you a roadmap of progression (if they are no paid, but earnt) and they give you character individuality. For paid skins, it gives the studios feedback/ more funding to keep renewing and updating the game. The key is to meet in the middle. Remove battle passes and bring in skins that fit within the world that don't make you look too out of place or ridiculous. Its more than evident that the lack of ambition and gamble in modern COD games is what is killing the franchise. There is a reason BF3/4 are so fondly remembered. Do not let this happen to battlefield.
i hate the never ending sniper glint, i wish instead of constantly being on it turns off after a second of you seeing it. that way the enemy has enough time to react and you have enough time to shoot.
Played one match of BF2024, saw the cringe "heroes" and uninstalled. They were a blight in BFV and ruined BF1's respect of the source material, but at least they didn't take over the whole game. It's disgusting to have the stupid dancing and the cringe one liners. It's also the same reason why I never played Siege when I played all the other R6 games, why would I want to play a game where I'm locked into one abrasive character when before I had total customization?
@@Wolfpunkzjust don’t stare down the scope the whole time they can only see glint while you looking down the scope or use a lower power scope with no glint
All DICE needs to do….nameless and faceless soldiers like BF3 and BF4. And they’ll be fine. Stop putting weird Fortnite skins and Starbucks baristas as classes.
@@conqeeftador5559 Does it though? Does the inclusion of Skins in Battlefield really improve profitability? DICE / EA have back to back failed products. Their most successful BFs were (male, authentically uniformed) operators.
@@GabrielMartinez-sd8pc I agree , but today’s market is all about micro transactions, battle pass and skins . All the big games like Fortnite COD valorent . I just don’t see a possibility of the next battlefield not having those
@@conqeeftador5559 I would agree, but that model didn't work in Battlefield though. It didn't work twice. The infusion of those business decisions has cost DICE / EA hundreds of millions (if not billions) in dollars of potential revenue. I think the Battlefield market can survive, and proven, to thrive on not being those things. I mean, there is possibly a market of gamers that want a break from that, and Battlefield by returning to Battlefield 3 and 4 roots without the eregious microtransactions and skins can be that haven. Not only will it pull the OG Battlefield base back, but those from the COD space that are not playing it because its basically Fortnite with a COD engine.
honestly good gamers are finally seeing how they get screwed over with modern AAA gaming now, it took too long to get here but at least it happened at all because i never thought the casual consumer would ever change
I honestly am just sick of battle pass and shops having weird skins and very overpriced skins on an already 70$ game I really hope they can find a way to make it better
Im sorry, but this is the new wave, weather you like it or not you have to accept it, and look at the good side of it: new maps and new weapons are free
@@claudio6572Unless you are FLAT OUT BROKE you're getting screwed. There is a cost for "free" and that cost is the loss of maps, weapons, skins, etc. and all done at a HIGH quality that we used to get. The math is very simple. Look at the count and delivery pace of new maps, game modes, and vehicles in the Battlefield 2, 3, and 4 expansion packs. Then look at the same stats for Battlefield 2042's "free" bullshit. It's less than a quarter the count of those.
@@claudio6572 show me the lie. How many new maps did 2042 put out? How fast was that? Battlefield 3 had 5 expansions with 20 new maps (some of the best the franchise has ever seen), numerous new gameplay modes, a bunch of new vehicles and weapons, and skins. And the expansions were on sale constantly so you could pick them up cheap.
I wrote a comment that went viral on jackfrags channel for exposing what he did to us with bf2042 and it got deleted but it was to late saved it and it’s in my description if you still want to see it anyways I yapped all this because we need to hold channel creators for supporting trash
Every single big game that’s been coming out recently have been flops, and every single big game that’s going to game out are turning out to be flops too. I don’t have much hope, but maybe Battlefield will come around this time.
Get rid of "games as a service". Bring back privately owned servers. Put out a finished product on day one with at least ten maps. Every couple of months, put out DLC with 3 to 4 maps, mew weapons, new vehicles. If you can't afford DLC on release day, wait for a sale
DLC? Paid servers? What happened to free updates? Why do you want to pay for extra content? If they have been doing this for years, then it doesn't seem like the greed changed much. Just changed shape
Yup, it’s not a service, it’s a scam. Just and excuse to drip feed a fraction of the content of paid DLCs and charging goofy ass skins for the price we paid for full DLCs with 3-4 maps and several weapons. If it provided better value these greedy corporations wouldn’t have ALL switched to it
@@samuraisurge I do agree that free live service games suck, but I just never agreed with paid dlc. Especially for a game I'm paying upwards of 70 euros for
man... they said the same for 2042. Right now gaming is such a bad space with live service crap, battlepasses, etc. Better wait until this comes out before even being excited. Let them earn their customers back
I miss the good ole days of DLC content the only problem with that though was people were complaining about the pricing of x amount on certain dlcs for maps and new guns ( pay to win in a sense ) but yet here we are in 2024 where people are now complaining about battle passes I think gamers have just come a place where we complain about everything on all levels
For me what I would want from BF1 in the new one would be the seriousness. The screams when one is under heavy mortar fire, or when one is burning alive, or is screaming for a medic. When a heavy caliber (like rockets and such things) hit the ground and dirt flys up and you see in your vision a bit of that wet dirt. Or that panic breathing when a grenade drops nearby....all that stuff. I really want goosebumps while playing.
As much as I want to be excited for the next Battlefield, I can't not let Andrew Wilson's "tremendous live service" comment linger in my head, and the marketing starting with the Black Ops 6 strategy of "Hey remember these dumb changes that never should have happened? We undid them!" Isn't something we should be praising as highly as people are, congratulations, you did something that shouldn't have even needed to be done if you'd actually understood the assignment at hand. The bit with them saying the game will have double the weapons of BF2042 is a hilariously low bar too, ~45 weapons at launch is still about half of what Battlefield 4 launched with over a decade ago (83). I really want to be excited, but I can't get excited knowing these things.
@@MTF-EPSILON-11-5-NULL They shouldn't have to start listening again, no competent company would stop listening to what their customers actually seek in a product. If a company built a car with no wheels and then the successor to said car came with wheels again, should they be praised like the second coming of Christ?
for what? you didn't learn your lesson with the past 2 bf installments to NOT be hyped? ok be disapointed. like i'm sorry but your doing it to yourself at this point. Wait until it comes out for like a month and see if its good. simple as. if you can't do that you deserve to have your money taken.
@@John-Xlol Ukraine just launched long range missiles into Russia and Russia fired a fckin ICBM in retaliation so we might actually get nuclear war before bf6 😂
BF2 was great. I dont think BF3 or 4 came close to what BF2 was. As long as I don't get anything woke I am happy. But, I am sure they will find something to put in the single player.
i swear to god people better not start getting hyped over the next battlefield omfg lol. but then again im sure once dice drops le epic nostalgia bait trailer you people are going to buy this garbage wholesale. do not preorder.
calling 1 and 5 terrible is hilarious tbh. Both have their flaws, and 5 could’ve been better in numerous major ways, but both of those games were a good time to play.
This felt longer than it was. Great breakdown and explanation of what we want. This is just my opinion, but BF3 had something that BF4 didn’t have. It was dirtier ,grimier, grittier, etc. BF3 was the greatest multiplayer game I’ve ever played.
Yes the gunplay was the main focus point. The weapon variety between all classes, not relying on gadgets, and decent map designs fit for most engagements. Sadly ea/dice has alienated players throughout the years and it started with dice La breaking gunplay for bf4 to cater to the minority.
@@johngood7619 You nailed it. The best rush vehicle in my opinion was the Amtrak. I LOVED driving that thing. If I had a competent gunner, easily top 1 and 2 on the scoreboard, and most importantly, a W on Rush. That thing was so damned good. So many people would just ram it into the M-COMM and let it get destroyed because they didn’t learn its strengths and weaknesses so they could keep it alive for an entire match. BF4 Amtrak was not as fun. I was so disappointed.
@@desubokudawanano BF3's Amtrak & UH-1Y Venom enjoyer, as an engineer, here 👨🔧I swear If I would've received a 1$ for everytime I saved my entire team, mostly solo, by obliterating main target on "rush mode" by sticking close to it via damn amtrak in a potentially last moments in those raids, I would be a millionaire... and that was hella fun, like everything in this game.
I enjoyed bf4 very much, but bf3, something about it. To me it looked more real. Then again bf3 was my first online Battlefield experience. I didn't understand at first but especially later on I had friends to help me and dude, the memories of laughing our asses off, getting angry at metro, everything. I made one of my best friends from back then. He treated me like little brother, constantly giving me hell but he knew when to let me know like hey man, it's all in good fun, I love you. It was a great time I'm happy to have the memories
I’m so glad that Zampella is taking the helm of battlefield. Just look at his track record- Modern Warfare, Titanfall, Apex Legends. Guy is a titan of the industry and I think BF6 is gonna be a classic
The first red flag is the global setting. The best Battlefield campaigns all had a connection between their locations other than "the plot happens here". NATO vs a PMC? Yikes.
I mean, considering groups like Wagner exist and operate on a global scale means that they aren’t too far off. Russia uses Wagner to take care of shit that the government can distance themselves from. Take with that what you will.
Personally one of the biggest problems with modern shooters is that Devs focus on the competitive scene, with all these metas for guns, attachments and perks. I just want to come home and play, not study a 50 page web article on what perks or attachments give me that 0.01% advantage. I'd be happy with the Battlefield 2 style, where there was no advantages with perks or attachments, it was only based on your personal skill with a chosen weapon.
I liked the way 2042 did it. It's simple and easy to understand. It's also amazing that I'm able to switch scopes/ammo types on the fly. It brings a bit more realism to the game.
Bring back faceless soldiers, men only, no flashy goofy skins(weapons and bodies). Bring back more naval combat, 1942 had drivable submarines, destroyers, aircraft carriers and torpedo boats. Bring back the commander system from BF2.
I'll be honest, I'm not exited about a battlefield 4.5, id be more excited about bf3.5 or bfbc2.5, most emphasis on bf3. Bf4 was good and it has aged well but I really thought bf4 was taking multiple steps back from bf3. it was a true masterpiece.
I’m cautiously optimistic now which is a miracle because I wasn’t even looking forward to this game at all originally. Reason being is that Vince Zampella is attached to the project. He’s a big name in the FPS scene so it gives me some hope it’ll be good. Regardless, don’t pre-order and don’t take the reveal trailer as what the gameplay will be like.
Definitely not falling for it after the failure of 2042. I’ve learned my lesson after getting hyped for 2042 trailer. They gonna put 80% of their money on the marketing and 20% on the actual development. I’m gonna wait for review and full release if it’s a flop then Rip battlefield for the third time. If it’s an actual Giga Chad and classic masterpiece I’ll be fainting on the cheese floor. Anyways nice vid ;)
At least they've not been developing during covid, which had a huge impact on 2042s botched release. As in, 2020 was the year of the hero shooter/operator shooter, so they changed it to that from a gritty BF4-but-set-in-the-future style game (as you can see in the early early concept art). This time, there's no excuse.
I unfourtunately was one of the pre-order victims for 2042. This game has to be amazing with amazing graphics, amazing animations, amazing maps, and amazing technology before I even think of opening my wallet
I love the fact that the community has come to the consensus that Battlefield 4.5 is a fitting term for our dream game. It's pretty much exactly what we and the franchise need to happen for Battlefield to not die
No, just you always online losers want that. The majority of people want the game to evolve and grow, not stagnate on gameplay from 10+ years ago. Also the battlefield “community” should be the last people listened to, nothing but the biggest crybabies exist with there. Go outside touch grass and stop crying about video games
Yes two armies going head to head is good. Although it should not been some "PMCs" or terrorist etc. It needs to be clear, real world countries just like earlier. Russia vs. NATO, China vs. USA in Pacific etc. PMCs could be DLC like awesome "Special Forces" was with legendary Battlefield 2. No fantasy pkease but real life countries in fictional modern conflict.
couldnt agree more. this was really annoying in 2042. they dont have the balls anymore to reference the real world because they are afraid to offend some people.
People keep talking about how the 2042 trailer was great and how the game launch was a dissapointment. I'll tell you what's a good game trailer, the BF3 multiplayer reveal trailer. Why? It actually shows the game. Not some pre rendered ultra hype machine cinematic with tornadoes and explosions. Keep it simple ffs
A war between NATO and a Mercenary company. Even though it’s a leak, I kinda hope it’s true as that could mean we get more than just American and Russian equipment to play with. Maybe even different vehicles depending on where the map is set.
US was EU, EU vs RU, RU vs CN, CN vs US maps. The only way I see Europe actually paying for a military is if they break away from the USD and SWFT hegemony, and it just makes a novel concept, like Tom Clancy's EndWar
@@NYG5 EndWar is almost exactly what I was expecting from this, setting wise. The deal might be a group of mercenaries funded by Russia and China, but they take on an anti-superpower cause instead of just an anti-western one. Might draw in more nations and bodies that way for them to actually have the ability to take on NATO in open warfare. BF2 also had EU in a dlc with a couple maps fighting China and MEC.
The difference about this coming from Vince is that he has never missed on any game he has released. Zero. This is what gives me hope for the outcome of this game. Vince was Activision's golden child until they got greedy after MW2 and started to control his creativity over Call of Duty, and EA gives him free reign to do whatever he wants creativity wise, thats why he works at EA. I think he's about to turn Battlefield into his new legacy game, since COD was his baby. Here's a list of the games he's produced: Medal of honor: Allied Assault Call of Duty 1 Call of Duty 2 Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 Titanfall Titanfall 2 Apex Legends Jedi - Fallen Order Jedi - Survivor EA DICE Sweden's new studio director Rebecka Coutaz, also has some great titles she's lead back in Ubisoft, all titles launched without major problems. I think this new version of DICE is gonna mop up the FPS sphere. All of that old blood was uninspired and tired of making Battlefield, got complacent and egotistical. Still, DO NOT PREORDER.
US is a part of NATO, bro. SMH. You guy's will buy this shit and as long as you do, they'll keep making shit games. Don't fall for it. Wait til it comes out and check the reviews.
They need to show gameplay on the first day of the reveal. Cinematic trailers are cool and all but the trust in the community is very low and they need to reassure us that they can make a good game that, at least, looks like it plays well. As well as the tone and graphics of the game are appropriate with the setting of the war and conflicts going on. No more quirky dialogues like 2042 at launch please for the love of god.
4:37 ''I can't identify those tanks from that angle'' Bruh The grills on the back of the hull clearly indicate that it is future variation of M1 Abrams, thus it is American tank. Pretty easily identifiable if someone has played BF3/4 before.
Im delusional but I really hope DICE makes a bf3 like campaign for the next battlefield. A campain where you're not a super soldier, you're just a soldier telling what you saw and did. A game where the protagonsit is fragile like every human.
They're taking a gamble trying to make another Battlefield game in general after that shit show. I'm done caring about what EA does at this point. I still play Battlefield 4 on PC and it's a great game. It's exactly what I want. I don't have to wait around for EA to try and recreate it. I assume that everything EA says is a lie until it's proven otherwise. Even if they are making a Battlefield 4.5, I bet they're going to find a way to completely fuck it up and ruin everything.
I don't know how you managed to make a well edited, well researched video with interesting thoughts in such a short period of time, but you did it, great job !
All of these are promises we've gotten before and all i can do is eyeroll. I don't understand how fans are excited for a game we've yet to seen shit of.
Game development used to be about making a decent game that was fun and bug free. Now its about making a game that they can break into bits to sell piece mail and an experience that's just good enough to play and just bad enough to incentivise microtransactions.
I'll be a bit disappointed if the conflict ends up being is nato vs a made up faction. I guess having russia, iran and china as the opposition is still a no go. But well we won't really know until we actually see what the game will be about
1000% agree. But companies don’t seem to realize that just because fornite is a success doesn’t mean we need some bright odd out of place skins in a modern shooter. Example: CALL OF DUTY 😂
I would much rather prefer if they would go back to the premiun system instead of the battlepass. Yes it cost as much as the game, but you are guaranteed quality content as we saw in the games that had it
That would be awesome. Then it could put some actual sense into how 2042 global catastrophe happened. I'm a story lore guy and the fact that 2042 completely abandoned the "plot" pissed me off.
@@vorpal2087I'm saying, I was really into seeing how it would turn out because I love near future earth predictions like cartels over taking governments, nations dissolving into factions/tribes/clans or massive nations arise out of thin air conquering the land
@@idancemyassintothepaint7571 No, imagine the map of North America or Europe, and every city you see is a potential battlefield for clashing factions. Burning citys indicating currently active battles where you can join and help your faction/country win over that city. Little by little pushing the enemy or circleing them.
Can I get a Battlefield/shooter where I don't see people with candy colored guns and weird costumes? Can it have semi-realistic mobility where the characters aren't flying around/sliding/drop-shotting/or whatever with stupidly high degrees of accuracy? Can I get a smaller player count so that it feels like my squad's contribution actually means something rather than getting steam-rolled by 20 guys at once when they finally decide to recap Bravo? Can we make suppression and MGs great again so that the sniper I'm lighting up doesn't just turn around and 1-tap me?
Extremely low quality standards. We're simply getting bf3/4 recycled and that's it. People are losing their minds over being able to replay games that have been out for 10+ years lol.
All I ever want is to jump back into BF3. For me, it was the best. A jump up from Bad Company but wasn’t so clumped up like BF4. Don’t get me wrong. BF4 looked great but felt a bit slow and too much. Flares were very good though. Loved the lighting in BF4 but it wasn’t that crisp grit that BF3 had. All I wish for at my age is to throw a band at a new BF3. Just the way it was. It was perfect. Perfect. Perfect.
I really hope a battle pass and skins dont ruin the feeling and aesthetic of the game. That's one thing I liked about battlefield 4 was each side having specific gear and soliders that gave them a certain look and character. Modern warfare 2019 was the first call of duty I really enjoyed in years but after a while they had the ramp the skins so people would buy them and it didnt take long until everyone was bright colors and shooting lazers. Dont even get me started on the other modern modern warfares.
You know what I really want AI to do in games? Maps generation. For every battle, every round. Just like Helldiver 2. You never find the same map. It’s immersive since there are so many planets and lands to set foot on. None of them should look familiar.
DO NOT PREORDER!
Never again... Last time I got burned was 2017 battlefront 2
like farming
Made that mistake with 2042, never again
@@ImBored8141 Dude them not letting me refund still pisses me off to this day. lol
@@ImBored8141Fr💀 My first ever pre-order too🤣 I should've known from the BETA
The main thing that modern shooters lack is grit and seriousness. Yes we are all playing these games for fun but when you have ridiculously cheesy, unrealistic, bright, colourful player models/skins, the games immersion is completely destroyed. Skins are great as they give you a roadmap of progression (if they are no paid, but earnt) and they give you character individuality. For paid skins, it gives the studios feedback/ more funding to keep renewing and updating the game. The key is to meet in the middle. Remove battle passes and bring in skins that fit within the world that don't make you look too out of place or ridiculous. Its more than evident that the lack of ambition and gamble in modern COD games is what is killing the franchise. There is a reason BF3/4 are so fondly remembered. Do not let this happen to battlefield.
i hate the never ending sniper glint, i wish instead of constantly being on it turns off after a second of you seeing it. that way the enemy has enough time to react and you have enough time to shoot.
Ah the cancerous battlepass
Played one match of BF2024, saw the cringe "heroes" and uninstalled. They were a blight in BFV and ruined BF1's respect of the source material, but at least they didn't take over the whole game. It's disgusting to have the stupid dancing and the cringe one liners.
It's also the same reason why I never played Siege when I played all the other R6 games, why would I want to play a game where I'm locked into one abrasive character when before I had total customization?
1000000% agree
@@Wolfpunkzjust don’t stare down the scope the whole time they can only see glint while you looking down the scope or use a lower power scope with no glint
All DICE needs to do….nameless and faceless soldiers like BF3 and BF4. And they’ll be fine. Stop putting weird Fortnite skins and Starbucks baristas as classes.
Sadly that’s impossible. New kids these days foam at the mouth for skins like Fortnite . And that’s what brings the most money
@@conqeeftador5559 Does it though? Does the inclusion of Skins in Battlefield really improve profitability? DICE / EA have back to back failed products. Their most successful BFs were (male, authentically uniformed) operators.
@@GabrielMartinez-sd8pc I agree , but today’s market is all about micro transactions, battle pass and skins . All the big games like Fortnite COD valorent . I just don’t see a possibility of the next battlefield not having those
@@conqeeftador5559 I would agree, but that model didn't work in Battlefield though. It didn't work twice. The infusion of those business decisions has cost DICE / EA hundreds of millions (if not billions) in dollars of potential revenue. I think the Battlefield market can survive, and proven, to thrive on not being those things. I mean, there is possibly a market of gamers that want a break from that, and Battlefield by returning to Battlefield 3 and 4 roots without the eregious microtransactions and skins can be that haven. Not only will it pull the OG Battlefield base back, but those from the COD space that are not playing it because its basically Fortnite with a COD engine.
@@GabrielMartinez-sd8pcgood points , hopefully you are right
"DO NOT PREORDER" seems to be the new slogan for the new Battlefield lol
You mean every game
honestly good gamers are finally seeing how they get screwed over with modern AAA gaming now, it took too long to get here but at least it happened at all because i never thought the casual consumer would ever change
Its been that way for almost a decade
You should never preorder a game.
Even when you love the publisher/developer
>More like every game
>For the last 10 years
I honestly am just sick of battle pass and shops having weird skins and very overpriced skins on an already 70$ game I really hope they can find a way to make it better
Im sorry, but this is the new wave, weather you like it or not you have to accept it, and look at the good side of it: new maps and new weapons are free
@@claudio6572Unless you are FLAT OUT BROKE you're getting screwed. There is a cost for "free" and that cost is the loss of maps, weapons, skins, etc. and all done at a HIGH quality that we used to get.
The math is very simple. Look at the count and delivery pace of new maps, game modes, and vehicles in the Battlefield 2, 3, and 4 expansion packs. Then look at the same stats for Battlefield 2042's "free" bullshit. It's less than a quarter the count of those.
@@RyneLanders ok
@@claudio6572 show me the lie. How many new maps did 2042 put out? How fast was that? Battlefield 3 had 5 expansions with 20 new maps (some of the best the franchise has ever seen), numerous new gameplay modes, a bunch of new vehicles and weapons, and skins. And the expansions were on sale constantly so you could pick them up cheap.
@@RyneLandersif your broke you won't be able to buy premium either so in away your kind of screwed both ways
DO NOT PREORDER
I wrote a comment that went viral on jackfrags channel for exposing what he did to us with bf2042 and it got deleted but it was to late saved it and it’s in my description if you still want to see it anyways I yapped all this because we need to hold channel creators for supporting trash
@@Machoman50ta What video did you post that comment on?
@@Machoman50tacan’t see it in your description
@@Machoman50tayour description is just racial slur 💀
I'm still mad that BFV didn't get a Eastern front expansion
Be happy u at least got a Mosin-gernade launcher.
We didn't get a proper navy or Italians.😢
bfv was an expansion its self
Bfv was made with PC in mind first unfortunately. The UI, the controls, everything literally felt off. Aiming was crap. Sigh.
I'd still buy it if it came out now
BfV was getting good when the pacific hit
PLEASE DICE… DONT MESS THIS UP!!!
Dice may not be saints, but the people who are responsible for most of the bullshit in recent battlefied titles are EA
Fair point, I’m just tired of the constant failure. For me it started with Star Wars battlefront 2015 and it’s just been fail after failure.
They already messed this, did you noticed AI art, ffs.
People said the same for 2042
Every single big game that’s been coming out recently have been flops, and every single big game that’s going to game out are turning out to be flops too. I don’t have much hope, but maybe Battlefield will come around this time.
Get rid of "games as a service". Bring back privately owned servers. Put out a finished product on day one with at least ten maps. Every couple of months, put out DLC with 3 to 4 maps, mew weapons, new vehicles. If you can't afford DLC on release day, wait for a sale
DLC? Paid servers? What happened to free updates? Why do you want to pay for extra content? If they have been doing this for years, then it doesn't seem like the greed changed much. Just changed shape
Because we got content, the amount of stuff that got added to 2042 in it's entire lifetime is less than 1 dlc for bf4..@@eamonncowan2839
Yup, it’s not a service, it’s a scam. Just and excuse to drip feed a fraction of the content of paid DLCs and charging goofy ass skins for the price we paid for full DLCs with 3-4 maps and several weapons.
If it provided better value these greedy corporations wouldn’t have ALL switched to it
Yes! DICE, Adults can pay for a better game with more content. Free to play a games as a service suck
@@samuraisurge I do agree that free live service games suck, but I just never agreed with paid dlc. Especially for a game I'm paying upwards of 70 euros for
man... they said the same for 2042. Right now gaming is such a bad space with live service crap, battlepasses, etc. Better wait until this comes out before even being excited. Let them earn their customers back
I miss the good ole days of DLC content the only problem with that though was people were complaining about the pricing of x amount on certain dlcs for maps and new guns ( pay to win in a sense ) but yet here we are in 2024 where people are now complaining about battle passes I think gamers have just come a place where we complain about everything on all levels
I would listen to a 30 minute video about the cosmonaut’s opinions on different types of sedimentary rocks
Give me the best parts of 4 and 1. One of those parts HAS to be the BF1 headshot sound. Loved it.
For me what I would want from BF1 in the new one would be the seriousness. The screams when one is under heavy mortar fire, or when one is burning alive, or is screaming for a medic. When a heavy caliber (like rockets and such things) hit the ground and dirt flys up and you see in your vision a bit of that wet dirt. Or that panic breathing when a grenade drops nearby....all that stuff. I really want goosebumps while playing.
The immersion and cinematic effect from 1, and the shooting mechanics of 4 = pure PERFECTION
That "ping" sound is straight crack for the soul
As much as I want to be excited for the next Battlefield, I can't not let Andrew Wilson's "tremendous live service" comment linger in my head, and the marketing starting with the Black Ops 6 strategy of "Hey remember these dumb changes that never should have happened? We undid them!" Isn't something we should be praising as highly as people are, congratulations, you did something that shouldn't have even needed to be done if you'd actually understood the assignment at hand.
The bit with them saying the game will have double the weapons of BF2042 is a hilariously low bar too, ~45 weapons at launch is still about half of what Battlefield 4 launched with over a decade ago (83).
I really want to be excited, but I can't get excited knowing these things.
So you mean start listening again that is very praise worthy
@@MTF-EPSILON-11-5-NULL They shouldn't have to start listening again, no competent company would stop listening to what their customers actually seek in a product.
If a company built a car with no wheels and then the successor to said car came with wheels again, should they be praised like the second coming of Christ?
@@ToiletGrenade well unfortunately this it the video game industry the bar is under the floor
Thus the honeymoon period begins
This is the most accurate statement ive seen in a while
for what? you didn't learn your lesson with the past 2 bf installments to NOT be hyped? ok be disapointed. like i'm sorry but your doing it to yourself at this point.
Wait until it comes out for like a month and see if its good. simple as. if you can't do that you deserve to have your money taken.
Remember, no preorders.
I already did 😉
Oh my some words!!! Don't forget Portal was a love letter to BF Fans and remember how it died almost immediately?
it would suck so bad if this game was actually good, but we never get to play it cuz real life WW3 happens lmao 💀
Remember when they said they were going back to basics with BF2042 but instead we got an empty game with very little content and no scoreboard?
@@John-Xlol Ukraine just launched long range missiles into Russia and Russia fired a fckin ICBM in retaliation so we might actually get nuclear war before bf6 😂
@@lumbagoboi1649 ik bro lmao we got WW3 before BF6 & GTA6 LOL 🤣
There is a reason why spend around 600 hours of bf1, go back to that formula
BF1's immersion and it's special classes (sentries and flame troopers) were amazing
What do you play on? I tried playing on Xbox and it was impossible to find a game.
@@BL_762 use server browser and check filters refresh
@@BL_762 on PlayStation I find games on most battlefields
@@BL_762 ps4 lol and i always have a match on
What's that kratos quote? "Keep your expectations low and you shall never be dissapointed, boy"
relevant cuz all the soldiers in the next BF are gonna be femboys.
What's the Dewey quote? "I expect nothing and I'm still let down"
I miss the BF 2 , Bad company and BF3 days . I remember playing these games back then... 😥😢
BF2 was great. I dont think BF3 or 4 came close to what BF2 was. As long as I don't get anything woke I am happy. But, I am sure they will find something to put in the single player.
i swear to god people better not start getting hyped over the next battlefield omfg lol. but then again im sure once dice drops le epic nostalgia bait trailer you people are going to buy this garbage wholesale. do not preorder.
10000000000% this a nostalgic trailer hyped up le epic is the first thing we fall for.
Not gonna fall for it again
Be quiet reditor
Yea this content creator is salivating over an artists concept art, as much as things change they stay the same.
calling 1 and 5 terrible is hilarious tbh. Both have their flaws, and 5 could’ve been better in numerous major ways, but both of those games were a good time to play.
This felt longer than it was. Great breakdown and explanation of what we want. This is just my opinion, but BF3 had something that BF4 didn’t have. It was dirtier
,grimier, grittier, etc. BF3 was the greatest multiplayer game I’ve ever played.
Yes the gunplay was the main focus point. The weapon variety between all classes, not relying on gadgets, and decent map designs fit for most engagements. Sadly ea/dice has alienated players throughout the years and it started with dice La breaking gunplay for bf4 to cater to the minority.
@@johngood7619 You nailed it. The best rush vehicle in my opinion was the Amtrak. I LOVED driving that thing. If I had a competent gunner, easily top 1 and 2 on the scoreboard, and most importantly, a W on Rush. That thing was so damned good. So many people would just ram it into the M-COMM and let it get destroyed because they didn’t learn its strengths and weaknesses so they could keep it alive for an entire match. BF4 Amtrak was not as fun. I was so disappointed.
@@Echo4Paparespect to all amtrak drivers in 3
@@desubokudawanano BF3's Amtrak & UH-1Y Venom enjoyer, as an engineer, here 👨🔧I swear If I would've received a 1$ for everytime I saved my entire team, mostly solo, by obliterating main target on "rush mode" by sticking close to it via damn amtrak in a potentially last moments in those raids, I would be a millionaire... and that was hella fun, like everything in this game.
Do not preorder
do not get a sponsor by them
do not glorify before the full release
DO
NOT
GIVE
THEM
HOPE
I enjoyed bf4 very much, but bf3, something about it. To me it looked more real. Then again bf3 was my first online Battlefield experience. I didn't understand at first but especially later on I had friends to help me and dude, the memories of laughing our asses off, getting angry at metro, everything. I made one of my best friends from back then. He treated me like little brother, constantly giving me hell but he knew when to let me know like hey man, it's all in good fun, I love you. It was a great time I'm happy to have the memories
I’m so glad that Zampella is taking the helm of battlefield. Just look at his track record- Modern Warfare, Titanfall, Apex Legends. Guy is a titan of the industry and I think BF6 is gonna be a classic
the GOAT of 21st century FPS
Zampella is the only reason i still have some hope in bf
The first red flag is the global setting. The best Battlefield campaigns all had a connection between their locations other than "the plot happens here". NATO vs a PMC? Yikes.
I mean, considering groups like Wagner exist and operate on a global scale means that they aren’t too far off. Russia uses Wagner to take care of shit that the government can distance themselves from. Take with that what you will.
Better have a bf1 operations type game mode too. Conquest is core battlefield but I love the tighter map boundaries of operations so much
If the game passes the smell test, I shall be a medic that supports my squad ASAP!
Personally one of the biggest problems with modern shooters is that Devs focus on the competitive scene, with all these metas for guns, attachments and perks.
I just want to come home and play, not study a 50 page web article on what perks or attachments give me that 0.01% advantage.
I'd be happy with the Battlefield 2 style, where there was no advantages with perks or attachments, it was only based on your personal skill with a chosen weapon.
This guy gets it
Yeah I was fine with the respective default service rifles we got in BF2 lol.
I liked the way 2042 did it. It's simple and easy to understand. It's also amazing that I'm able to switch scopes/ammo types on the fly. It brings a bit more realism to the game.
Lol
Because of low skill plebs like you casualfield 1 happened
Battefield 3 was the ultimate peak for the series. If it resembles even a bit of that I’m in.
Bring back faceless soldiers, men only, no flashy goofy skins(weapons and bodies). Bring back more naval combat, 1942 had drivable submarines, destroyers, aircraft carriers and torpedo boats. Bring back the commander system from BF2.
Hahahahahhaha you thought you could slip in the “men only” like a republican slipping something nefarious into a bill 😂
I'll be honest, I'm not exited about a battlefield 4.5, id be more excited about bf3.5 or bfbc2.5, most emphasis on bf3. Bf4 was good and it has aged well but I really thought bf4 was taking multiple steps back from bf3. it was a true masterpiece.
I’m cautiously optimistic now which is a miracle because I wasn’t even looking forward to this game at all originally. Reason being is that Vince Zampella is attached to the project. He’s a big name in the FPS scene so it gives me some hope it’ll be good. Regardless, don’t pre-order and don’t take the reveal trailer as what the gameplay will be like.
No one going to talk about how they use ai for there showcase
Wait wha
@@thecosmonaut4221 You didn’t know that ea was using ai for there showcase?
@@funny-gv3ml oh I thought you meant the concept art was Ai generated
@@thecosmonaut4221 it was
@@Swaguleyholy shit you’re right
Definitely not falling for it after the failure of 2042. I’ve learned my lesson after getting hyped for 2042 trailer. They gonna put 80% of their money on the marketing and 20% on the actual development. I’m gonna wait for review and full release if it’s a flop then Rip battlefield for the third time. If it’s an actual Giga Chad and classic masterpiece I’ll be fainting on the cheese floor. Anyways nice vid ;)
Simple, bring back class system and thats it..... Specialist bored as hell
@@adieraditz if they pull out a Battlefield bad company or 3 on us I’ll DEFINITELY faint on that cheese floor fr.
@@heatgamer7008 bad company isn't that bad, except single player
@@adieraditz I’ll be selling my soul for an other bad company campaign
At least they've not been developing during covid, which had a huge impact on 2042s botched release. As in, 2020 was the year of the hero shooter/operator shooter, so they changed it to that from a gritty BF4-but-set-in-the-future style game (as you can see in the early early concept art). This time, there's no excuse.
I unfourtunately was one of the pre-order victims for 2042. This game has to be amazing with amazing graphics, amazing animations, amazing maps, and amazing technology before I even think of opening my wallet
This before another Lego video is crazy
Blame EA for dropping news on a random Monday
@@thecosmonaut4221Blame EA for ending Battlefront II's live service 😭
I love the fact that the community has come to the consensus that Battlefield 4.5 is a fitting term for our dream game. It's pretty much exactly what we and the franchise need to happen for Battlefield to not die
Battlefield 3.5 fr fr
No, just you always online losers want that. The majority of people want the game to evolve and grow, not stagnate on gameplay from 10+ years ago.
Also the battlefield “community” should be the last people listened to, nothing but the biggest crybabies exist with there. Go outside touch grass and stop crying about video games
Yeah call it battlefield 2034
I quit cod like 2 months after mw2 came out and I’ve just been waiting for a new battlefield to go back to basics ever since.
Remember, no pre-order
Modern era != good game
If they think BF3 and 4 was good only because it was in modern era, then they dont see the full picture
man if this next battlefield can just make me feel the same way as when i played damavand peak rush for the first time, im in
Yes two armies going head to head is good. Although it should not been some "PMCs" or terrorist etc. It needs to be clear, real world countries just like earlier. Russia vs. NATO, China vs. USA in Pacific etc. PMCs could be DLC like awesome "Special Forces" was with legendary Battlefield 2. No fantasy pkease but real life countries in fictional modern conflict.
There should be PMC factions in some maps like there was ANZAC factions on a few BF1 maps. But they should be fighting for specific nations like irl
couldnt agree more. this was really annoying in 2042. they dont have the balls anymore to reference the real world because they are afraid to offend some people.
@@sanitoeter4743reminds me of when the Americans got offended by Medal of Honour calling a faction the Taliban. Such delicate little flowers 💐
Before any of yall think about pre orders or even buying day 1. Remember that " love letter to fans" which was a spit in the face to all of us.
People keep talking about how the 2042 trailer was great and how the game launch was a dissapointment. I'll tell you what's a good game trailer, the BF3 multiplayer reveal trailer. Why? It actually shows the game. Not some pre rendered ultra hype machine cinematic with tornadoes and explosions. Keep it simple ffs
Don't get hyped... don't get hyped... don't get hyped... oh, no...
This is their last chance.
With Vince Zampella leading it, I'm feeling pretty good about it.
A war between NATO and a Mercenary company. Even though it’s a leak, I kinda hope it’s true as that could mean we get more than just American and Russian equipment to play with. Maybe even different vehicles depending on where the map is set.
so basically amerimutts vs wagner/dogwater pmc?
@@chlorhexidine2506 or russimutts vs pmc.
@chlorhexidine2506 u have an inferiority complex, as most of the world does with the U.S.A
US was EU, EU vs RU, RU vs CN, CN vs US maps. The only way I see Europe actually paying for a military is if they break away from the USD and SWFT hegemony, and it just makes a novel concept, like Tom Clancy's EndWar
@@NYG5 EndWar is almost exactly what I was expecting from this, setting wise. The deal might be a group of mercenaries funded by Russia and China, but they take on an anti-superpower cause instead of just an anti-western one. Might draw in more nations and bodies that way for them to actually have the ability to take on NATO in open warfare. BF2 also had EU in a dlc with a couple maps fighting China and MEC.
The difference about this coming from Vince is that he has never missed on any game he has released. Zero. This is what gives me hope for the outcome of this game. Vince was Activision's golden child until they got greedy after MW2 and started to control his creativity over Call of Duty, and EA gives him free reign to do whatever he wants creativity wise, thats why he works at EA. I think he's about to turn Battlefield into his new legacy game, since COD was his baby.
Here's a list of the games he's produced:
Medal of honor: Allied Assault
Call of Duty 1
Call of Duty 2
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2
Titanfall
Titanfall 2
Apex Legends
Jedi - Fallen Order
Jedi - Survivor
EA DICE Sweden's new studio director Rebecka Coutaz, also has some great titles she's lead back in Ubisoft, all titles launched without major problems. I think this new version of DICE is gonna mop up the FPS sphere. All of that old blood was uninspired and tired of making Battlefield, got complacent and egotistical.
Still, DO NOT PREORDER.
I just hope the factions are US, EU NATO, RUSSIA, China. and maybe Japan jsdf?
PMCsvs african warlords would be cool.
US is a part of NATO, bro. SMH. You guy's will buy this shit and as long as you do, they'll keep making shit games. Don't fall for it. Wait til it comes out and check the reviews.
JSDF would be awesome
US is part of NATO….
Japan should be the only nation with anime helicopter lol
im not the biggest fan of military shooters but its definitely what battlefield needs right now in my opinion
They need to show gameplay on the first day of the reveal. Cinematic trailers are cool and all but the trust in the community is very low and they need to reassure us that they can make a good game that, at least, looks like it plays well. As well as the tone and graphics of the game are appropriate with the setting of the war and conflicts going on. No more quirky dialogues like 2042 at launch please for the love of god.
4:37 ''I can't identify those tanks from that angle''
Bruh
The grills on the back of the hull clearly indicate that it is future variation of M1 Abrams, thus it is American tank. Pretty easily identifiable if someone has played BF3/4 before.
Please no more hero characters and stupid skins I can’t take it anymore
Im delusional but I really hope DICE makes a bf3 like campaign for the next battlefield. A campain where you're not a super soldier, you're just a soldier telling what you saw and did. A game where the protagonsit is fragile like every human.
"We've been here before"
What a world we live in
People need to be reminded not to pre-order 💀
They're taking a gamble trying to make another Battlefield game in general after that shit show. I'm done caring about what EA does at this point. I still play Battlefield 4 on PC and it's a great game. It's exactly what I want. I don't have to wait around for EA to try and recreate it. I assume that everything EA says is a lie until it's proven otherwise. Even if they are making a Battlefield 4.5, I bet they're going to find a way to completely fuck it up and ruin everything.
Sick video broski. Imma hop on bf4 because of it
I don't know how you managed to make a well edited, well researched video with interesting thoughts in such a short period of time, but you did it, great job !
Since the initial reveal I’ve gotten probably 12 accumulative hours of sleep
@@thecosmonaut4221 ahah
All of these are promises we've gotten before and all i can do is eyeroll. I don't understand how fans are excited for a game we've yet to seen shit of.
Game development used to be about making a decent game that was fun and bug free. Now its about making a game that they can break into bits to sell piece mail and an experience that's just good enough to play and just bad enough to incentivise microtransactions.
Ye
Ladies and gentlemen, let’s pray they don’t mess this up
The jet and helicopter physics were horrible in 2042. Chances of them bringing back the old BF4 BF3 gameplay feel are anorexic at best.
Me patiently waiting for a battlefield 1 esk game again😅
You need to stop hyping this up. It’s just concept art
Sad Bf3 is losing its online servers hopefully the community will find a way to keep it going after the shut down
even remaking bf4 would be better than what they all promissing every year
I'll be a bit disappointed if the conflict ends up being is nato vs a made up faction.
I guess having russia, iran and china as the opposition is still a no go.
But well we won't really know until we actually see what the game will be about
Wasn't it "leak" a few years back of it just being u.s. and nato vs some random pmc group
China cries too much so can’t have them
If they can’t do nato verse Russia, china, Iran, etc… then they shouldn’t make a modern game. Using a mode up pmc group is stupid and over done.
"No one wants the game to fail at launch"... I want it.
I dont want to see a single "PMC faction"... Those are so boring.
My Opinion to revive themselves in 2 words "Bad Company"
V Still playing BF1 button
All I've wanted from Battlefield is US based maps. Please!
No pre-order
Dude ARE you blind? This is AI random generated photo, this has 0 art, this has nothing to do with battlefield. Ffs
1000% agree. But companies don’t seem to realize that just because fornite is a success doesn’t mean we need some bright odd out of place skins in a modern shooter. Example: CALL OF DUTY 😂
Squad Member: REQUESTING ORDERS
Squad Leader: *Comma Rose* -> 'Command' -> *DO NOT PREORDER THIS OBJECTIVE*
Squad Member: AFFERMATIVE
So they’re finally doing what the community’s wanted since the last 2 releases .. hope they don’t f**k it up.
#makebattlefieldgreatagain
Please Donald Trump
Please
Save me from another shitty Battlefield
It’s not a gamble if they go back to the basics
we MIGHT be back bros
I would much rather prefer if they would go back to the premiun system instead of the battlepass. Yes it cost as much as the game, but you are guaranteed quality content as we saw in the games that had it
Time to get on the Hype Train🤞
It needs the heart and soul of Battlefield 1 mixed with the core gameplay and fun of BF3 and BF4. They do that and they are literally back in the game
Remember: do what ever the hell you want. Idc
They could make a WAR mode where every battle you win matters in a grander scale war.
Just a grunt doing his duty...
That would be awesome. Then it could put some actual sense into how 2042 global catastrophe happened. I'm a story lore guy and the fact that 2042 completely abandoned the "plot" pissed me off.
@@vorpal2087I'm saying, I was really into seeing how it would turn out because I love near future earth predictions like cartels over taking governments, nations dissolving into factions/tribes/clans or massive nations arise out of thin air conquering the land
Isn't that a thing? Grand conquest or something!
@@idancemyassintothepaint7571 No, imagine the map of North America or Europe, and every city you see is a potential battlefield for clashing factions. Burning citys indicating currently active battles where you can join and help your faction/country win over that city. Little by little pushing the enemy or circleing them.
Can I get a Battlefield/shooter where I don't see people with candy colored guns and weird costumes? Can it have semi-realistic mobility where the characters aren't flying around/sliding/drop-shotting/or whatever with stupidly high degrees of accuracy? Can I get a smaller player count so that it feels like my squad's contribution actually means something rather than getting steam-rolled by 20 guys at once when they finally decide to recap Bravo? Can we make suppression and MGs great again so that the sniper I'm lighting up doesn't just turn around and 1-tap me?
At this point, their marketing tactic fpr every release is: "we have learned and will fix our mistakes"
How people can even be excited for a dice game i will never know
same way people get excited by COD game
They've made decent games at worst and peak at best. I might be a minority but i'm incredibly excited for this
@@mesuper455
I was incredibly excited for bf2042. I preordered it for 90$
This is my biggest regret in video game history…
Extremely low quality standards. We're simply getting bf3/4 recycled and that's it. People are losing their minds over being able to replay games that have been out for 10+ years lol.
@@epic8923A updated version of a game we love isn’t really that bad is it? That’s literally what most people would want out of a new battlefield
My favorite part of this is bringing back the class system
All I ever want is to jump back into BF3. For me, it was the best. A jump up from Bad Company but wasn’t so clumped up like BF4. Don’t get me wrong. BF4 looked great but felt a bit slow and too much. Flares were very good though. Loved the lighting in BF4 but it wasn’t that crisp grit that BF3 had. All I wish for at my age is to throw a band at a new BF3. Just the way it was. It was perfect. Perfect. Perfect.
why am I hyped by just looking at fucking concept art😭
Hope there lots of factions to play as,would be cool
I really hope a battle pass and skins dont ruin the feeling and aesthetic of the game. That's one thing I liked about battlefield 4 was each side having specific gear and soliders that gave them a certain look and character. Modern warfare 2019 was the first call of duty I really enjoyed in years but after a while they had the ramp the skins so people would buy them and it didnt take long until everyone was bright colors and shooting lazers. Dont even get me started on the other modern modern warfares.
You know what I really want AI to do in games? Maps generation. For every battle, every round. Just like Helldiver 2. You never find the same map. It’s immersive since there are so many planets and lands to set foot on. None of them should look familiar.
Most retarded idea ever
It'd be pretty cool if they took maps like Amiens from Battlefield 1 but modern day
Bf1 is the best multiplayer gaming experience I’ve ever had but damn if I’m not excited for bf to go back to 3-4, those games were unreal
That picture gives me Karkand vibes. I like it.
Apparently it’s Gibraltar
all vehicle categories on one map would be sick
Im ready for what dice is bringing to the table.
This video reminds me too much of my tragic life as a Halo fan