Re-Imagining Work - Dave Coplin
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лип 2024
- Dave Coplin, Chief Envisioning Officer at Microsoft, imagines what might be possible if organisations really began to think differently about the power of technological and social change to transform the way we do business.
Listen to the podcast of the full event including audience Q&A: www.thersa.org/__data/assets/f...
Follow the RSA on Twitter: / thersaorg
Like the RSA on Facebook: / thersaorg
Our events are made possible with the support of our Fellowship. Support us by donating or applying to become a Fellow.
Donate: www.thersa.org/support-the-rsa
Become a Fellow: www.thersa.org/fellowship/apply
amen brother.
truth is simple
people need freedom
From a small business owner with multiple upon multiple of employees, this is brilliant. As well as a teacher of sorts, students do need to understand that technology is not what "can it do for me?" But why can I use it for "to further my progress".
Nice to see someone at Microsoft talking sense.
Excellent points! Engaged workers give 57% more effort and are 87% less likely to resign - Engaged workers have a lower rate of absenteeism, less turnover, and work more efficiently. They have a stronger commitment, take on leadership and personal responsibility for their work, create a positive culture, increase customer loyalty, sales and profits.
Thank u :)
Great talk :)
We've got rid of vehicle registration stickers for private vehicles in New South Wales.
The authority seem to have forgotten that vehicle repairers need to know whether a vehicle is registered before they drive it on the road.
serendipitous encounters with another employee can get you fired
Ever since I first used a touch screen back in the late 90's I hated the experience. The only touch device I have is a smart phone and even that has a slide out keyboard. I need the tactile feedback of buttons having the device vibrate is no substitute for the resistance of pressing a button.
Google and Facebook do not allow telecommuting because serendipitous encounters with colleagues are so important for innovation that you need to have staff in the same place at the same time. It looks that once again Microsoft are far off the mark.
If Microsoft had listened to this guy (much more), they wouldn't be so doomed now.
***** Dlouho známá věc. Přitom MS se ale dlouhodobě snaží o MS Office-only kurzy.
***** Obávám se, že zpracování elektronického textu (osnova, styly, odkazový materiál) není bohužel tak intuitivní aby to většina uživatelů pochopila bez průpravy...
stačí naučit lidi přemýšlet a je po problémech ;-)
This comment didn’t age well...
@@portlyoldman Why do you think that? Seems still quite spot on to me.
False.
That the QWERTY layout was not designed to slow down typing, rather the opposite.
Keys were arranged so that letters that frequently follow eachother are on opposite sides of the keyboard. This allowed for faster writing by frequently alternating hands while at the same time minimized the risk of jamming.
Marker flips
"The top 2 most used letters of English: {e, t}, accounting for 20% of all letters, are on the home row of Dvorak layout, each pressed by middle finger. On QWERTY, it's not in home row. [...] Does this simple fact imply that on Dvorak, at least you don't have to move your fingers as much?"
"Nobody really cares about historical technicality. What people really want to get, is whether Dvorak is not more efficient than QWERTY. People want to find a reason to justify their reluctance to change."
"E" and "T" are the most frequent letters, but "TH" is the most frequent letter combination. QWERTY was designed on the basis of most frequent letter combinations, not their individual frequency.
However, just out of curiosity I did an analysis where I checked whether letters appears on opposite sides for the 10 most frequent pairs {th,er,on,an,re,he,in,ed,nd,ha} and it turns out Dvorak gets it right 9/10 while QWERTY only 5/10. Although this was a very basic analsysis, it makes me wonder.
I think a input system similar to Google Now's input / search would be amazing.
arresting people for trolling does not imply that we're understanding the technology behind. quite the opposite in my opinions.
still, a good talk on a very important topic.
We will never see the benefits of working smarter instead of harder until we ditch the inflationary, debt-based money system. Prices FELL and living standards rose in 19th century America due to increased productivity, before they established the Fed. Now we increase productivity and the surplus is already earmarked to pay off debt to banksters.
Ted Kazinsky said the same thing....collaboration is not communication.
An extension of ourselves? ;)
WORK IS SLAVERY, AUTOMATION IS LIBERATION. RBE NOW!
I'm pretty sure it's Stephen Merchant with a ponytail...
If that's true, it's an interesting factoid. Nevertheless, I thought this talk was very interesting.
THE SOLUTION? Email voice memos.