I like to say “Nintendo Devs are the best, Nintendo Corporate are the worst” It’s the developers that gives us the games we love, the artists that create games that’s uniquely “Nintendo” But it is always the corporate side of Nintendo that drags the company’s name through the mud, shutting down fan projects, stopping community tournaments, and being overprotective with their IP just to name three
Nintendo: "Gaming!" Disney: "Entertainment!" All modern car manufacturers: "Transport!" All international banks: "Finance!" Amazon: "And everything else!" *In unison*: "With our power's combined, we are the Supervillains of this Generation!"
no one should be allowed to patent game mechanics, and nintendo are being incredibly evil, but to clarify, the map thing is kinda dialed specifically to how the totk fast travel map moves and fades in a way they try to word to make it sound unique. It's still complete BS though. but they have a lot more that's REALLY scummy in their totk patents like "the physics for standing on a moving object" which absolutely has been done before in the way they implemented and is straight up just modeling real world physics
look, Nintendo is an objectively evil company, but the "they are suing us for having a similar concept" is just the palworld devs spin on an actual copyright infringement. There is legally justifiable evidence that several of the 3d models from palworld were ripped from pokemon games. Like, 3d models are infamously hard to re-create from scratch and some of the palworld models and rigs are 99% identical when you overlay them with pokemon models. They aren't in trouble for "being similar", they are in trouble for downright stealing assets. Which considering the company has a history of making asset flip games, its not a big stretch that they did this. Ask yourself the question of why the dozens of other successful pokemon-likes haven't been sued but this one has? Hell, several of the pokemon-likes are ON THE NINTENDO ESHOP. This isn't cooperate overreach, its dude fucked around and found out.
except that's not what the lawsuit is about. Nintendo filed a patent where "a digital character aims at another digital character and throws something at them" and are suing them on patent grounds. For aiming and throwing in a video game.
@@Null_Experis we don't know the actual nature of the lawsuit, anything like what you just said is speculation. The details haven't been released. But once again, there are way more Pokemon-likes than palmon and yet they are the first one to be sued. So it would likely be something that specifically palworld did to offend.
That would be a copyright issue, not a patent issue. Palworld is one of the most successful Steam games of all time (THE most successful when it launched), it doesn't take a genius to figure out why Nintendo is targeting them over other games
Either way why does it matter Pokémon is one of the biggest multimedia products so what u use something that looks like a luxaray or Lucario (a fantasy lion and a anubis creature) very few Pokémon are very original ideas they make millions from plush toys books anime two games and cards
My headcannon is that Nintendo became the antagonist since the president of their American branch became Bowser.
>Sonic embodies Freedom.
>SEGA was the rival to Nintendo in the 90's.
>Freedom fights Oppression.
THE PROPHESY! THEY KNEW! IT'S ALL TRUE!
I'm worried Sega's recent success might lead them down a similar route as Nintendo and Capcom.
The prophesy!
I like to say “Nintendo Devs are the best, Nintendo Corporate are the worst”
It’s the developers that gives us the games we love, the artists that create games that’s uniquely “Nintendo”
But it is always the corporate side of Nintendo that drags the company’s name through the mud, shutting down fan projects, stopping community tournaments, and being overprotective with their IP just to name three
Nintendo: "Gaming!"
Disney: "Entertainment!"
All modern car manufacturers: "Transport!"
All international banks: "Finance!"
Amazon: "And everything else!"
*In unison*: "With our power's combined, we are the Supervillains of this Generation!"
Instead of the normal supervillain lap cat, do you think Nintendo has an evil looking lap Pikachu?
Naw its meowth, hes always been pulling the strings.
1:55 this is exactly what Edison did to Tesla and dozens of other geniuses that didn’t believe in patents (they were a very new concept)
no one should be allowed to patent game mechanics, and nintendo are being incredibly evil, but to clarify, the map thing is kinda dialed specifically to how the totk fast travel map moves and fades in a way they try to word to make it sound unique. It's still complete BS though. but they have a lot more that's REALLY scummy in their totk patents like "the physics for standing on a moving object" which absolutely has been done before in the way they implemented and is straight up just modeling real world physics
welcome to capitalism, grab some popcorn
local streamer misunderstands legal system: world shocked
look, Nintendo is an objectively evil company, but the "they are suing us for having a similar concept" is just the palworld devs spin on an actual copyright infringement. There is legally justifiable evidence that several of the 3d models from palworld were ripped from pokemon games. Like, 3d models are infamously hard to re-create from scratch and some of the palworld models and rigs are 99% identical when you overlay them with pokemon models. They aren't in trouble for "being similar", they are in trouble for downright stealing assets. Which considering the company has a history of making asset flip games, its not a big stretch that they did this. Ask yourself the question of why the dozens of other successful pokemon-likes haven't been sued but this one has? Hell, several of the pokemon-likes are ON THE NINTENDO ESHOP. This isn't cooperate overreach, its dude fucked around and found out.
except that's not what the lawsuit is about.
Nintendo filed a patent where "a digital character aims at another digital character and throws something at them" and are suing them on patent grounds.
For aiming and throwing in a video game.
@@Null_Experis we don't know the actual nature of the lawsuit, anything like what you just said is speculation. The details haven't been released. But once again, there are way more Pokemon-likes than palmon and yet they are the first one to be sued. So it would likely be something that specifically palworld did to offend.
@@ForsakenFalcon11 It's US patent 20230191255, which was filed a year or two earlier in Japan.
Look it up.
That would be a copyright issue, not a patent issue. Palworld is one of the most successful Steam games of all time (THE most successful when it launched), it doesn't take a genius to figure out why Nintendo is targeting them over other games
Either way why does it matter Pokémon is one of the biggest multimedia products so what u use something that looks like a luxaray or Lucario (a fantasy lion and a anubis creature) very few Pokémon are very original ideas they make millions from plush toys books anime two games and cards