Here's hoping that everyone remembers that "there are no bad ships, just bad builds" mantra, as last year's Anniversary Bundle might have had the Parlament ... -- which would have made a lot of Lower Decks fans happy (and a few Eaglemoss fans happy, as it had a fantastic XL model from them) -- but thanks to a lot of mutual middle finger pointing, that didn't happen. 😢
Breast Cancer is very unlikely to come back. As it was via Groupees the first time. Juggling rights with both the charity and possibly Groupees, unless run again, as before. Is probably a rights and permissions nightmare. While making a new box without the ribbon (copyright/trademark) is trivial. It will be the rest causing problems.
You all seem to be hung up on verbiage and pet peeves and missing the entire point of people's questions while doing it. People watch your videos and want to do what you do. They want to get in a tfo and have people not dreading that they are there. So viable, optimal, if you think its about that, you are missing the message/question entirely (for most) At whatever level of the game they are at, they want to be as much the hero as they can be. No really, it is that simple.
People can do what we do in any ship. You can shred with viable and optimal. The entire point is that there are no bad ships, just bad builds. And as stated in the podcast, there's a video coming that addresses exactly how to build a ship. Any ship. For any purpose.
@@99Cheops99 I wasn't confused to the overall point you were making, just making an observation that kids do play the game and to temper grammar expectations. There are all kinds of videos that tell people what to build. What weapon & what console and which bridge officer abilities to slot. There are precious few that make people understand why some things work and others do not. They don't understand synergies. Why Intel & Temporal on this ship works, but on that ship, not nearly as well. I think understanding these things is a necessary step to 'proving' any ship can 'shred.'
Bit of a longer one this month folks, but we had a looooot to cover.
Hey guys good job on this podcast, I'm looking forward to more. 🎉❤
Thank you for the entire convo on Viable vs Optimal. My old D'deridex with Single Cannons and Turrets Thanks You so much.
I really enjoy these. Looking forward to future episodes.
Good podcast!
I loved the Han Solo reference and these community type chit chats are great.
Good job all of you on this podcast....great moderation Mara.
thanks for the shoutout Cheops
I hope DECA watches that vid. Is good stuff!
Length is fine when the content is good. BTW, the Gunslinger video is awesome.
Great content, looking forward to the next episode.
A possible option for Phoenix, would be all event stuff goes into Phoenix for six months, to a year. Then, goes into Mudds.
I appreciate the work you are putting into your content Mara. Happy New Year to you!
Here's hoping that everyone remembers that "there are no bad ships, just bad builds" mantra, as last year's Anniversary Bundle might have had the Parlament ... -- which would have made a lot of Lower Decks fans happy (and a few Eaglemoss fans happy, as it had a fantastic XL model from them) -- but thanks to a lot of mutual middle finger pointing, that didn't happen. 😢
First view! First like! What do i win? Lol.
Is Spencer's "Howdy folks, Spencer here," just a pre-recorded sound bit you inserted into this?
No that's just something he does when you push The Button
I really want to do a build on a Galor. Is that ship viable????????????
Not the way you fly!!!!!!!!!
@99Cheops99 is this the toxicity Spencer mentioned?
Breast Cancer is very unlikely to come back. As it was via Groupees the first time. Juggling rights with both the charity and possibly Groupees, unless run again, as before. Is probably a rights and permissions nightmare. While making a new box without the ribbon (copyright/trademark) is trivial. It will be the rest causing problems.
7 of first
You all seem to be hung up on verbiage and pet peeves and missing the entire point of people's questions while doing it. People watch your videos and want to do what you do. They want to get in a tfo and have people not dreading that they are there. So viable, optimal, if you think its about that, you are missing the message/question entirely (for most) At whatever level of the game they are at, they want to be as much the hero as they can be. No really, it is that simple.
People can do what we do in any ship. You can shred with viable and optimal. The entire point is that there are no bad ships, just bad builds. And as stated in the podcast, there's a video coming that addresses exactly how to build a ship. Any ship. For any purpose.
@@99Cheops99 I wasn't confused to the overall point you were making, just making an observation that kids do play the game and to temper grammar expectations.
There are all kinds of videos that tell people what to build. What weapon & what console and which bridge officer abilities to slot.
There are precious few that make people understand why some things work and others do not. They don't understand synergies.
Why Intel & Temporal on this ship works, but on that ship, not nearly as well. I think understanding these things is a necessary step to 'proving' any ship can 'shred.'