Click "Join" and become part of the Nox Crew Adventurers for early access to view all remaining Delicious in Dungeon reactions for Season One right NOW! I've had some iPhone users tell me they are having trouble joining the membership. The link below should bring you to the join page (possibly through Safari is my guess?) Channel Membership: ua-cam.com/channels/px9A3bzmXZJqVIjoH_VsXQ.htmljoin See you next Wednesday for Episode 16! ~Nox~
I loved that episode because it showcased a bit more on expanding Chilchuck and Laios' abilities. Compared to Marcille who has a fairly steady character growth, Laios and Chil are fairly stagnant up to this point. Highlighting the Half-foot's heightened senses and Laios' natural affinity for magic opened doors for them in terms of story, and also helps understand why half-foots are so good at trap finding in general beyond the stereotypical "short people are sneakier"
Really, the entire second half of this season does an incredible job building upon the party dynamics, but also giving each character a lot of development. I was pleasantly surprised at how the intention behind story and worldbuilding continuously work together and build towards new and exciting insights and developments!
The food's rich, saturated colors are big on adding to their appeal. I would try almost every dish that they've featured on this, despite their dubious origins. Also, you are spot-on with the character development. Even Marcille, who has not been suffering for a lack of characterization up until this point, gets some... until she goes right back to her standard OOT reactions.
Probably not. I was 17 the last time I did it. 20 years ago. Haha. Must just have ine if those random American Medieval faces. Haha. I'd love to get back into heavy combat, but I think our local shire disbanded after COVID.
On the note of source vs sorcery, they come from different etymological roots: in latin they were "surgo" meaning origin, amd "sors" meaning fate. It's important to understand that there are lots of linguistic coincidences because I've seen scammers use them to trick people into believing they've been lied to; sovcits in particular love their cherry-picked wordplay.
I won't lie, I had to look up what sovcits meant. I thought it was a topical cream for Rosacea or something. I understand the etymological roots are different, and perhaps I placed too much emphasis on the wordplay. I could have pulled from where my actual research on the topic sprang from which was from the collective works of LL Research and Don Elkins with their RA contact recordings and transcripts about "The Law of One", but thats a little too far out of the purview about pulling from the infinite and feeling it course through your body like Marcille was describing. I confess, back in 2019 through 2021 I listened to a lot of David Wilcock. I loved his work on Ancient Aliens, and enjoyed his videos he was putting out. I've never wholesale bought into much of it, but as a storyteller, they were always interesting creative thought experiments. But like most, once the topic of money arises, the snake oil salesman can't help but come out. That's when I started creating distance. The tinfoil hat part of my brain wonders that when topics get too popular, disinformation agents sow chaos to keep the contagion of ideas from spreading. Either way, sorcerer was meant as an anchor point to keep the discussion rooted in the fantasy, but I can see how speaking off the cuff as I did made it seem like I was trying to speak with some level of authority on the matter as it pertains to ideologies I have had no contact with or knowledge of. Haha. Ah, the wild life of internet citizenry.
It wasn't a huge slip-up, I just wanted to set the record straight because I have some personal issues with letting bad info stand. Like with Ancient Aliens, it is sometimes funny to watch but also painful if you know enough real history because of how blatantly obviously they're lying to your face every single minute. Not just posing silly ideas: *outright lying* about what evidence exists (or doesn't exist) in order to make their ideas sound less absurd. Like, the Pyramids: lies about the stone (we know where the quarries are, found the tools they used, found manuals for using them, recreated the methods to check that they work, found records of foremen counting how much work was done each day, etc.); lies about the positional accuracy (not at any specific coordinates that has a meaninful number in modern units, not perfectly square, not perfectly aligned with north), lies about their context (the three big ones at Giza are part of a huge funerary+temple complex, and there are dozens of other major sites in Egypt with their own impressive monuments), lies about their age (they are neither unfathomably ancient nor built by the same culture as Cleopatra, who lived closer to modern day than their construction), lies about links to other structures (as if humans the world over couldn't independently come up with the idea of building something that vaguely resembles a mountain). But all that would be fine if such works simply acknowledged themselves as fictional, but they don't because that doesn't sell as well. Instead, they present themselves as factual, informational, serious works-and people end up believing the lies. Not just the conclusion, but the foundational lies which are used to justify it; even those who rightfully recognize the conclusion as absurd don't catch all the lies they use to justify it, and end up believing in falsehoods. And while these little falsehoods seem innoccuous, over time they can build up until one day a person actually thinks about what they know, and realizes it doesn't add up... Then those conclusions don't seem as absurd, and another person falls into the rabbit hole.
I think what you say is extremely important, especially in today's world where information, both factual and not, is diseminated and spread across the internet on a global scale at incredible speeds. I feel like I'm taking some indirect fire in your crusade against misinformation, though. Haha. I wish you well on your quest. I will continue to elucidate on how it feels to experience humanity. And I will allow you the corrections to my ramblings to better inform the masses how we have lived out our humanity. 🤝
![THEY ACTUALLY ATE BRICKS | Delicious in Dungeon Episode 16 Reaction [ENGLISH DUB]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SlTamELTBtY/mqdefault.jpg)
![THEY ACTUALLY ATE BRICKS | Delicious in Dungeon Episode 16 Reaction [ENGLISH DUB]](/img/tr.png)
!["This looks DELICIOUS" - A Weeb & Normie Watch Dungeon Meshi (Reaction Highlights) [S1E1-2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/fBbjazS95oc/mqdefault.jpg)
Click "Join" and become part of the Nox Crew Adventurers for early access to view all remaining Delicious in Dungeon reactions for Season One right NOW!
I've had some iPhone users tell me they are having trouble joining the membership. The link below should bring you to the join page (possibly through Safari is my guess?)
Channel Membership:
ua-cam.com/channels/px9A3bzmXZJqVIjoH_VsXQ.htmljoin
See you next Wednesday for Episode 16!
~Nox~
I loved that episode because it showcased a bit more on expanding Chilchuck and Laios' abilities. Compared to Marcille who has a fairly steady character growth, Laios and Chil are fairly stagnant up to this point. Highlighting the Half-foot's heightened senses and Laios' natural affinity for magic opened doors for them in terms of story, and also helps understand why half-foots are so good at trap finding in general beyond the stereotypical "short people are sneakier"
Really, the entire second half of this season does an incredible job building upon the party dynamics, but also giving each character a lot of development. I was pleasantly surprised at how the intention behind story and worldbuilding continuously work together and build towards new and exciting insights and developments!
We’re so back
The food's rich, saturated colors are big on adding to their appeal. I would try almost every dish that they've featured on this, despite their dubious origins. Also, you are spot-on with the character development. Even Marcille, who has not been suffering for a lack of characterization up until this point, gets some... until she goes right back to her standard OOT reactions.
Turns out, he wasn't just passionate about it 😭
0:59 👀
You'll definitely want to see the next reaction for sure! 🤣
You know I thought you looked oddly familiar. I am wondering if I might recognize you from SCA.
Probably not. I was 17 the last time I did it. 20 years ago. Haha. Must just have ine if those random American Medieval faces. Haha.
I'd love to get back into heavy combat, but I think our local shire disbanded after COVID.
On the note of source vs sorcery, they come from different etymological roots: in latin they were "surgo" meaning origin, amd "sors" meaning fate.
It's important to understand that there are lots of linguistic coincidences because I've seen scammers use them to trick people into believing they've been lied to; sovcits in particular love their cherry-picked wordplay.
I won't lie, I had to look up what sovcits meant. I thought it was a topical cream for Rosacea or something.
I understand the etymological roots are different, and perhaps I placed too much emphasis on the wordplay. I could have pulled from where my actual research on the topic sprang from which was from the collective works of LL Research and Don Elkins with their RA contact recordings and transcripts about "The Law of One", but thats a little too far out of the purview about pulling from the infinite and feeling it course through your body like Marcille was describing.
I confess, back in 2019 through 2021 I listened to a lot of David Wilcock. I loved his work on Ancient Aliens, and enjoyed his videos he was putting out. I've never wholesale bought into much of it, but as a storyteller, they were always interesting creative thought experiments.
But like most, once the topic of money arises, the snake oil salesman can't help but come out. That's when I started creating distance. The tinfoil hat part of my brain wonders that when topics get too popular, disinformation agents sow chaos to keep the contagion of ideas from spreading.
Either way, sorcerer was meant as an anchor point to keep the discussion rooted in the fantasy, but I can see how speaking off the cuff as I did made it seem like I was trying to speak with some level of authority on the matter as it pertains to ideologies I have had no contact with or knowledge of. Haha. Ah, the wild life of internet citizenry.
It wasn't a huge slip-up, I just wanted to set the record straight because I have some personal issues with letting bad info stand.
Like with Ancient Aliens, it is sometimes funny to watch but also painful if you know enough real history because of how blatantly obviously they're lying to your face every single minute. Not just posing silly ideas: *outright lying* about what evidence exists (or doesn't exist) in order to make their ideas sound less absurd.
Like, the Pyramids: lies about the stone (we know where the quarries are, found the tools they used, found manuals for using them, recreated the methods to check that they work, found records of foremen counting how much work was done each day, etc.); lies about the positional accuracy (not at any specific coordinates that has a meaninful number in modern units, not perfectly square, not perfectly aligned with north), lies about their context (the three big ones at Giza are part of a huge funerary+temple complex, and there are dozens of other major sites in Egypt with their own impressive monuments), lies about their age (they are neither unfathomably ancient nor built by the same culture as Cleopatra, who lived closer to modern day than their construction), lies about links to other structures (as if humans the world over couldn't independently come up with the idea of building something that vaguely resembles a mountain).
But all that would be fine if such works simply acknowledged themselves as fictional, but they don't because that doesn't sell as well. Instead, they present themselves as factual, informational, serious works-and people end up believing the lies. Not just the conclusion, but the foundational lies which are used to justify it; even those who rightfully recognize the conclusion as absurd don't catch all the lies they use to justify it, and end up believing in falsehoods.
And while these little falsehoods seem innoccuous, over time they can build up until one day a person actually thinks about what they know, and realizes it doesn't add up... Then those conclusions don't seem as absurd, and another person falls into the rabbit hole.
I think what you say is extremely important, especially in today's world where information, both factual and not, is diseminated and spread across the internet on a global scale at incredible speeds. I feel like I'm taking some indirect fire in your crusade against misinformation, though. Haha.
I wish you well on your quest. I will continue to elucidate on how it feels to experience humanity. And I will allow you the corrections to my ramblings to better inform the masses how we have lived out our humanity. 🤝