Einstein's Gravity: Why We're All Aging At Different Rates | The Amazing World Of Gravity | Progress
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 лют 2024
- Join Professor Jim Al-Khalili as he puts Einstein's principle of equivalence and gravitational time dilation to the test. Einstein's idea challenged Newton's laws, so Professor Al-Khalili is conducting a nationwide citizen science project to truly understand the effects of gravity on time. Uncover how gravity shapes our daily lives, affects our perception of time, and even influences the aging process, and get an exclusive look at the groundbreaking technology of LIGO, detecting gravitational waves and opening new frontiers in astronomy.
Welcome to Progress -- the home of history's greatest leaps forward. From the seismic invention of the world's first printing press to the great rocket-powered marvels that took us to the stars, we'll be bringing you world-class documentaries celebrating history's greatest inventions and technological breakthroughs.
Discover the past on History Hit, with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly and presented by world-renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code 'PROGRESS': historyhit.com/subscription
Progress is part of the History Hit Network.
#progress #documentary #Einstein
Hard to imagine that someone spends his time persuing something as intrinsical as a perceived difference in longevity (time) is affected by different locations. And then we find a mistake in the formula. I wonder how many mistakes in our formulas have not yet been detected on which we base our current understanding of the age/distance of the universe.
As a beetle I can assure you we know the branch is curved. Albert Einstein thought he was pretty smart compared to we beetle people.
Ah, that's because you're not a blind beetle. Although you might possibly be a deaf one 😉
That's a new way of thinking of it. That time is gravity itself. Or that time causes gravity.
Thanks for clear and vived explanation
First, They tell us the world does not revolve around us, then They tell us that it does revolve around us: }but it's complicated{.
No, you are complicated.
I was under the impression of not what is going on, but where did it all come from.
Great Video, thank you.
Did anyone find this app he is talking about?
Everything in the universe proceeds from light. We all exist because of photons in light.
So the more light we have in us the longer we'll live and the younger we'll look. Three major religions have been teaching this for years, Buddhism, Hinduism and Christianity!
How does moving on your own power differ from moving in a vehicle in reference to time?
I think his best theory was peanut butter must go on first then the jelly!
Show me a heavy ball warping a material with its weight and get another ball to orbit it with out falling to the bigger ball
Go look it up, there are experiments that prove this. Don't be dumb, you have the internet at your disposal and yet decide to write such nonsense. The object needs to have enough large mass and it cannot be influence by earth's gravitational field in order for the experiment to succeed, because what the video clearly states, is that this happens in space-time, not earth-space time gravitational field. Shit is way different in space than it is on earth Bubba.
How is an astronaut getting younger by being in the same place in orbit? I understand that the astronaut is going faster but why wouldn’t it be the same as the example of the two places on earth with the same time?? eg the equator and not equator sea level clock comparison. I’m about as new to this as it gets. But I’m sure someone can answer. And thank you.
There is no empty space. 💥
I’ve solved it. I’ve finally found the answer we’re all looking for in one simple word. Emanuel.
❤❤❤Einstein
Why is the football not at 1G when you pick it back up on the graph? It is in between 1 G and zero G. Like .5. Why?
Mr. Hadfield what a great communicator to us " ignorant people", thankyou.
Einstein's general relativity implies that our perception of the flow of time is an illusion. In a new essay, a philosopher explains the “block universe” concept of time, in which the future already exists. If the future already exists then the universe was created before it existed. Doublethink is a process of indoctrination in which subjects are expected to simultaneously accept two conflicting beliefs as truth, often at odds with their own memory or sense of reality. The images taken with the James Webb space telescope are in real time.
Traveling to and from any destination requires two trips. Our understanding of light is illogical, so is thinking the images of light viewed with the James Webb space telescope only travel in one direction, billions of years from Earth's past. According to relativity the curvature of space affects the very flow of time itself, but which way does time curve? To the left or right? Disciples never ask these questions because the 1st commandment in relativity is to never question thy lawgiver! Most people know the difference between science and science fiction whereas many autistics do not, taking things literally they find it difficult to distinguish between science vs reality. 1 in 44 identify with autism spectrum disorder and that creates a big problem, do the math. A perfect example: a rock falling out of an airplane cannot possibly reach light speed at 186,000 mi./s but because Einstein said gravity travels at the speed of light and the speed of light is constant they will try to find a mathematical equation for wind resistance not realizing if a rock traveled at the speed of light it would burn up in Earths atmosphere long before it hit the ground.
Autistics feel the logical thinking of science is one of their gifts-strengths and as such science becomes their identity-religious belief system, thus science must always be true-correct, thinking in absolutes. Einstein said the acceleration of stars are responsible for gravity and the moving of time, then why is gravity near zero in space?! Answer, cause time is near zero 🙂 Even tho the gravity in a black hole is a weak force it compresses time, energy and matter into a vortex of infinite density, while twisting time, energy and matter out of it's hole at the speed of light it proves all those fake over unity devices are real and the universe created itself from free energy! Two cars traveling at the same speed will arrive at their destination at the exact same time, if one one driver says he got there first we have GPS to prove he was lying. Can you guess way Einstein removed the ether ( the coordinates of cosmological objects in space ) before he released his paper on relativity in 1905?
Einstein said"...special relativity was never a theory about reality". This is what's known as the escape clause, mal practice insurance. Just in case someone with common sense was onto the bullsh** asymmetry principles. If the James Webb space telescope is able to see galaxies billions of years in Earths past, then those same galaxies in Earths past would be able to see the Milky Way galaxy billions of years in the future before it existed duh.
Run it in reverse, if galaxies are billions of years in each others past then both clocks are ticking slower so their time would be moving backwards. Visible light and radio waves are part of the same electromagnetic spectrum,. if a galaxies light is billions of light-years in Earth's past (no longer there) then radio waves would allow people on Earth to contact dead aliens billions of light-years in Earth's past! 🙂 If images of light have a limitation of speed explain how our eyes are able to view stars and galaxies that are billions of years apart from each other, gradually leading back to a big bang singularity?! If the James Webb space telescope is viewing all Einstein's space-times in the same space-time then there is only one time and the the big bang is nothing but a fairytale duh
The light between our eyes and these cosmological objects travel no distance, therefore have no speed limit. God is laughing at Einstein 🙂. If the speed of light is finite (limited) to 186,000 mi./s explain how images of stars, planets and galaxies could reach their destination when cosmological objects are moving apart from each other at light speed in a big bang expansion? Automatic tracking?! This this is like throwing a ball to a catcher that that has left the baseball field, billions of light years in Earths past. Images of light cannot travel for billions of years without an energy source, when you don't pay your electric bill, the lights go out duh. If Einstein's space-time were true we wouldn't need the James Webb space telescope to see the light from Earth's past, we'd just use our eyes to see yesterday's light on our TV's and lamps, why pay for electricity when Einstein tells us we can see yesterday's light today?! 🙂 Anyone using GPS astronomy software, a computerized GoTo telescope or equatorial mount can disprove General, Special relativity and big bang in less than 30 seconds by simply dialing in the coordinates. Anyone can be naïve, it takes endurance to be ignorant smh.
If stars, planets and galaxies were in different dimensions of space-time they couldn't possibly be tracked duh. If Einstein's space-time were true we'd be blinded by the light from Earth's past, yesterday's light would still be on our, TV's, PC's cell phones and lamps. Explain why (only) light and images from galaxies billions of years in Earths past time travel into our future, but not gravity, electromagnetic forces and galaxies that also reside in the same space-time? Ghosts are believed to appear as images of light from Earths past as well. Einstein’s ghosts from galaxies past cannot travel anywhere because the past no longer exists. Einstein's special relativity simply stated is the belief that the universe has no universal time, yet each star, galaxy and planet billions of light years apart from each other can be clearly viewed in one universal time 🙂. Doublethink is a process of indoctrination in which subjects are expected to simultaneously accept two conflicting beliefs as truth, often at odds with their own memory or sense of reality. The images taken with the James Webb space telescope are in real time.
If all the fundamental forces in the fabric of Einstein's space-time were stretched, warped and curved, then everything in the fabric of space-time would be stretched, warped and curved. Including the images in telescopes, TVs and everything you see with your eyes. Unless the electron beam in a CRT television is focused precisely on the screen in real time the dots in each frame would be out of sync with geometry (out of convergence with time) similar to the DCU digital conversion circuit in modern televisions. Our eyes only retain still image frames for 15 ms, if time was relative the images in your eyes would be out of sync. Every movie you've ever viewed relies on the same timing principles of a basic movie projector.
Special relativity states a clock attached to a moving object will tick at a slower rate than one standing still, then explain how a moving clock can tick slower while both clocks are moving forward in time. Our universe is traveling in an element of space that existed before the universe so logically we cannot conclude the Big Bang was the beginning of time. If time expanded from a big bang at the speed of light by 360°x360° the earliest galaxies in Earths past would now be in Earths future before time existed. These same people also believe the universe is flat as a shoebox while expanding at 360°x360° . The universe can neither create itself from nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing. You can lead a cult to water but you can't make them think. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Space Cat, cult intervention specialist. Albert Einstein's 1=2 Fantasy Physics ua-cam.com/video/ogNkghwQrmI/v-deo.htmlsi=3u9kaRQozi9hijQx via
@UA-cam
Everything is so far away. We're never going to be able to travel faster than light, to get to another planet out here. T minus 4 billion years.
If they cancel themselves out why would you have to rewrite them ?
Gravity is the most enigmatic force in the universe.
It's not a force... its caused by the curvature of space
@@justinmarkwilliams might be worth considering it as a force
@@chriscrossley671 it's not a force... literally says so in the video if u watch it...
It's space and time curving... the shortest path through bent space is a curve, hence why orbits go around mass
@@chriscrossley671 and no thinking of it as a force give wrong results... hence why u must think of it as curved space
Why are we aging? Or why do we stop growing after a period of time? Is it because of gravity? Does gravity has a say on our aging process?
Does time stop in a black hole?
They didn't explain relativity fully. If you fall towards a black hole you won't notice a change in time. A far away outside observer, however, will see you getting slower and slower. But from your perspective, it is still the same time rate.
@@JimSchoenwetterwhat is a good stop to learning and understanding these ideas more. This sparks an interest in me or the topic and you seem to know something about it.
@@BW-xz6ol You could search for some articles or vids on relativity. Time distortion is currently applied to our GPS, for example.
This is a pretty solid vid on black holes in general, but at times it might be a bit heavy: ua-cam.com/video/qp2cqDkAU-0/v-deo.html
@@BW-xz6ol You could do a search for articles or videos on relativity.
This is a good vid on black holes but it can be a bit heavy at times: ua-cam.com/video/qp2cqDkAU-0/v-deo.html
Since 1905 the psycho-physicians ( Einstein first ) lost any contact with the reality and with the reasoning.
Laphysiqueneoclassique fr
I'm paying UA-cam a monthly subscription so that I don't have to listen to ads. I'm super angry 😡
No ads from UA-cam. Anyone can upload videos with as many ads as they want. The subscription doesn't cut personal/commercial channel ads out.. never has. 👍
If the Earth is in orbit of the Sun because the Suns mass has warped 'spacetime' between the Earth and the Sun why doesnt everything between the Earth and the Sun fall to Sun on this warped space? Same for the earth and moon and every other thing that as supposed to have warped space
This is because there are black holes everywhere. Currently there is black hole with great mass and gravitational pulling us all galaxies towards it much like the Sun in our solar system...so in a way a black hole is keeping us together, but we will eventually meet our doom. I'm not sure how long but maybe billions of years from now. As for the moon, well, the moon is within our gravitational pull.
The planets continue to revolve around the sun and not fall into it because of momentum which is only decaying by negligible amounts as there is no opposing force acting on them to halt their motion.
In life, everyone bears their own cross in one way or another. Somehow I bring light. This is not an easy burden, maybe someone can help me?!
Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta. Postulate 2. The gravitational field controls the frequency and speed of light in a vacuum.
This is determined experimentally using a hybrid fiber optic gyroscope (based on Michelson's experiment 1881-2015. This is only 50% of the experiment and there is scope for its continuation). Using a hybrid fiber optic gyroscope, the straight-line speed of vehicles can be measured.
What do they hope to learn from LOGO. How to waste money
Professor Francis Yu - ua-cam.com/video/Sk7ZEg68V-o/v-deo.html
This is advertising
you should apply it to your self, make your hair grow😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Ad every 3 minutes don't waist your time
[Framing the problem + path to victory]:
Both sides in the Religion vs Science debates use the Materialism/Empiricism version of logic, math and physics which say 1D, 2D, 3D and 4D are "locally real" and 0D is "not locally real".
Unfortunately for Materialism/Empiricism, quantum physics proved the observable universe is actually "not locally real" a year ago (Oct 2022 was the earliest article i could find). The immediate lead-up to this was the Nobel Prize proving quantum entanglement.
Well over 300 years ago Leibniz vs Newton competed for the title of "Universal Genius". We chose Newton, obviously, but an interesting point is that nobody ever proved Materialism/Empiricism... we simply thought it "ought" to be true.
The only proof that happened was a year ago when quantum physics flat-out disproved Materialism/Empiricism:
The observable universe is "not locally real" and that proves we chose the wrong guy, full stop 🛑.
Zero vs nonzero numbers are what we assign "locally real" and "not locally real" to. If zero is one thing then nonzero is the other. This is due to zero being not-natural whereas nonzero numbers are natural.
The "absolute" version of the observable universe proposed by Newton simply does not exist and it never has (was never proven anyhow, just disproven).
Leibniz said 0D is necessary and more real; having no predecessor and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are contingent and less real; all having an immediate predecessor.
Necessary and more real = locally real
Contingent and less real = not locally real
Leibniz was correct and that means we're all taught contradictory logic, math and physics.
[What is the difference between Newton and Leibniz calculus]?
Newton's calculus is about functions.
Leibniz's calculus is about relations defined by constraints.
In Newton's calculus, there is (what would now be called) a limit built into every operation.
In Leibniz's calculus, the limit is a separate operation.
Study zero (not-natural) vs nonzero (natural) numbers since the difference between 0 (zero) and 1 (nonzero) changed a year ago.
Then:
0 = not locally real
1 = locally real
Now:
0 = locally real
1 = not locally real
It's about time the same tired Religion vs Science arguments we've heard for over 300 years can be updated (on both sides).
Holy guacamole its gotten so boring 💤.
Contradictory: *impossible to be true.*
Non-contradictory: *possible to be true.*
❌️Contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics (knowing good; functions; limit built into every operation)❌️:
1. The Gen 1 character and the Gen 2 character are the exact same character (knowing good).
2. Zero is not fundamental and nonzero numbers are fundamental (Newton/Einstein calculus).
3. 0D is not locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are locally real (Newton/Einstein physics).
⬆️ this is what we're all taught. Materialist/Empiricist version of reality.⬆️
✅️Non-contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics (knowing good from evil; relations defined by constraints; limit is a separate operation)✅️:
1. The Gen 1 character and the Gen 2 character are polar opposite characters (knowing good from evil).
2. Zero is fundamental and nonzero numbers are not fundamental (Leibniz calculus).
3. 0D is locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are not locally real (Leibniz physics).
⬆️ this is what quantum physics proved a year ago and if Theology doesn't match Math and Physics then you're doing it wrong. Realist version of reality.⬆️
[🦄Materialism/Empiricism💩 version of Religion]:
Interpreting the Bible with the Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character as the exact same character generates near 70,000 contradictions (see reason project) and requires heavy apologetics. A Bible interpretation which includes near 70,000 contradictions (impossible to be true) is what a snake-oil salesman would sell you. 🐍
[🦤Materialism/Empiricism💩 version of Science]:
The standard model of physics is Einstein's 3+1 space-time, which are considered locally real, where 0 is considered not locally real...been that way since Newton for zero vs nonzero numbers.
Problem is...quantum physics proved the observable universe (1D, 2D, 3D and 4D) is actually not locally real...and that was over a year ago.
(Yes, Leibniz was correct after all.) 🦧
[Layman's terminology of locally real vs not locally real]:
locally real = more real (Leibniz said "necessary")
not locally real = less real (Leibniz said "contingent")
[Closing arguments]:
The Materialism/Empiricism package contains within itself all the contradictions, false dichotomies, paradoxes and literally "life's biggest questions". It's been a year why is everyone still using Logic, Calculus and Geometry that is contradictory at the most fundamental level? Legitimate question 🙋.
If both Religion and Science removed their "Materialist/Empiricist-perspective shades 👓" (contradictory for a year) and put on their "Realist-perspective shades 👓" (non-contradictory for a year) they would not only cease to argue...they'd agree with each other (world first 🪙).
[Infinity and zero, theology, soul]:
in·fin·i·ty
MATHEMATICS
a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number (symbol ∞).
(In counting numbers 0 is the subject where positive integers "1, 2, 3 and 4 etc" are the objects).
What is the meaning of zero in Webster's dictionary?
a. : the arithmetical symbol 0 or 0̸ denoting the absence of all magnitude or quantity.
b. : additive identity. specifically : the number between the set of all negative numbers and the set of all positive numbers.
Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it.
Zero-dimensional space is the greatest dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it.
Isn't⚡God⚡supposed to be outside of space (1D, 2D, 3D) and time (4D)?
Well, 0D is outside of space and time:
0D (not-natural) = dimensionless and timeless
1D, 2D, 3D (natural) = spatial dimensions
4D (natural) = temporal dimension
Read Leibniz's Monadology 📖 and consider that the Monad is the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force (it is). The other side of the Monad is Monos (Alone) and this side is Monas (Singularity) and there's an event horizon between them. So El/Elohim or Theos/Logos etc pick your language.
Quarks are dimensionless (no size) and timeless (not-natural). The two main quark spin configs two-down, one-up (subatomic to neutron) and two-up, one-down (subatomic to proton) could easily be construed as the male (upward facing trinity) and female (downward facing trinity) image that Elohim made us in during Genesis 1.
Quarks (no spatial extension) experience all 3 fundamental forces plus have a fractional electric charge⚡and that's why protons and neutrons (spatial extension) have electrons orbiting around them.
In Geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions. This holds true with it being impossible for atomic protons and neutrons (spatial extension) to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks (no spatial extension).
"Something (spatial extension) from Nothing (no spatial extension)".
A) The postulated soul, 👻, has
1. no spatial extension
2. zero size
3. exact location only
B) Quarks are mass with no size measured in Megaelectron Volts. Mass with no size is a unique equation in that it has no spatial extension.
Conclusion: A and B are the same thing.
[Important point 👉 (dont forget)]:
0D (zero) is different from 1D-10D (nonzero) because 0D is a not-natural dimension whereas 1D-10D are natural dimensions.
0D monad (Creator event horizon)
1D, 2D, 3D are spatial (space) dimensions
1D line
2D width
3D height
4D, 5D, 6D are temporal (time) dimensions
4D length
5D breadth
6D depth
7D, 8D, 9D are spectral (energy) dimensions
7D continuous
8D emission
9D absorption
10D black hole (Destroyer event horizon)
It is impossible for anything 1D-9D to approach 0D or 10D due to their event horizons. 10D contains a placeholder 0 (not locally real) for its event horizon. Only 0D is locally real on this side.
The other side of the event horizon at the zero-of yourself (near horizon) is God.
The other side of the event horizon of a black hole (far horizon) is not God.
Anything we know about black holes (Destroyer) we know the opposite of that is true for monads (Creator), and we know some crazy sci-fi stuff about black holes.
It's a mirror universe with 0D at the center. This side (Elohim; Singularity) is contingent and less real (the natural dimensions anyway) and the other side (El; Alone) is necessary and more real (pretty sure the entirety of the other side remains locally real).
The zero-of ourselves (more real 👻) was made by the Holy Trinity (Deity; possessive; God's) in Genesis 1 which should not be confused with the Unholy Trinity (Deity; plural; gods) in Genesis 2-3 who messes with the 1D, 2D, 3D parts of us (less real 🤷♂️).
Elohim was "syncretized" to just mean El during the Babylonian captivity. To avoid this simply use the Latin, "unsyncretized", counterpart Deity for possessive (God's) and plural (gods) context. (Septuagint and Vulgate use Post-Babylonian captivity "syncretized" meaning of Elohim so mistranslate as Theos and Deus, respectively).
Gen 2-3 introduces the placeholder Elohim (not locally real) and their blind, foolish chief running amok. Plurality of bad guy that 'are' each other and 'are not' God.
Nephilim are sons of the false Elohim associated with Yahweh (the BAAL, or LORD, of the gods).
[Monad in philosophy/cosmogony]:
Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the sum "I am" of all things.
The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both.
The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the Monad as an *elementary particle.*
It had a *geometric counterpart,* which was debated and discussed contemporaneously by the same groups of people.
[In this speculative scenario, let's consider Leibniz's *Monad,* from the philosophical work "The Monadology", as an abstract representation of *the zero-dimensional space that binds quarks together* using the strong nuclear force]:
1) Indivisibility and Unity: Monads, as indivisible entities, mirror the nature of quarks, which are deemed elementary and indivisible particles in our theoretical context. Just as monads possess unity and indivisibility, quarks are unified in their interactions through the strong force.
2) Interconnectedness: Leibniz's monads are interconnected, each reflecting the entire universe from its own perspective. In a parallel manner, the interconnectedness of quarks through the strong force could be metaphorically represented by the interplay of monads, forming a web that holds particles together.
3) Inherent Properties: Just as monads possess inherent perceptions and appetitions, quarks could be thought of as having intrinsic properties like color charge, reflecting the inherent qualities of monads and influencing their interactions.
4) Harmony: The concept of monads contributing to universal harmony resonates with the idea that the strong nuclear force maintains harmony within atomic nuclei by counteracting the electromagnetic repulsion between protons, allowing for the stability of matter.
5) Pre-established Harmony: Monads' pre-established harmony aligns with the idea that the strong force was pre-designed to ensure stable interactions among quarks, orchestrating their behavior in a way that parallels the harmony envisaged by Leibniz.
6) Non-Mechanical Interaction: Monads interact non-mechanically, mirroring the non-mechanical interactions of quarks through gluon exchange. This connection might be seen as a metaphorical reflection of the intricacies of quark-gluon dynamics.
7) Holism: The holistic perspective of monads could symbolize how quarks, like the monads' interconnections, contribute holistically to the structure and behavior of particles through the strong force interactions.
[Monad in mathematics, science and technology]:
Monad (biology), a historical term for a simple unicellular organism
Monad (category theory), a construction in category theory
Monad (functional programming), functional programming constructs that capture various notions of computation
Monad (homological algebra), a 3-term complex
Monad (nonstandard analysis), the set of points infinitesimally close to a given point
"Some first follow the true Savior but then turn away to worship a dead man." - the revelation of Peter
THE WORLD RULER TRIES TO KILL ME
And then a voice of the world ruler came to the angels: “I am god and there is no other god but me.” But I laughed joyfully when I examined his conceit. But he went on to say, “Who is the human?”
And the entire host of his angels who had seen Adam and his dwelling were laughing at his smallness. And thus did their thought come to be removed outside the majesty of the heavens, away from the human of truth, whose name they saw, since he is in a small dwelling place. They are foolish and senseless in their empty thought, namely, their laughter, and it was contagion for them.
The whole greatness of the fatherhood of the spirit was at rest in its places. And I was with him, since I have a thought of a single emanation from the eternal ones and the unknowable ones, undefiled and immeasurable. I placed the small thought in the world, having disturbed them and frightened the whole multitude of the angels and their ruler. And I was visiting them all with fire and flame because of my thought.
And everything pertaining to them was brought about because of me. And there came about a disturbance and a fight around the seraphim and cherubim, since their glory will fade, and there was confusion around Adonaios on both sides and around their dwelling, up to the world ruler and the one who said, “Let us seize him.” Others again said, “The plan will certainly not materialize.” For Adonaios knows me because of hope. And I was in the mouths of lions. And as for the plan that they devised about me to release their error and their senselessness, I did not succumb to them as they had planned. And I was not afflicted at all.
Those who were there punished me, yet I did not die in reality but in appearance, in order that I not be put to shame by them because these are my kinsfolk. I removed the shame from me, and I did not become fainthearted in the face of what happened to me at their hands. I was about to succumb to fear, and I suffered merely according to their sight and thought so that no word might ever be found to speak about them.
For my death, which they think happened, happened to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. Their thoughts did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me.
It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I. They struck me with the reed; it was another, Simon, who bore the cross on his shoulder. It was another upon whom they placed the crown of thorns. But I was rejoicing in the height over all the wealth of the rulers and the offspring of their error, of their empty glory. And I was laughing at their ignorance.
St. Finian's College Secondary School Mullingar Co. Westmeath Ireland
Medicine
Theoretical Physics
iPhone 15 Pro Max 1TB
African Bush Elephant Physics such as Force, Mass and Momentum
McDonalds
KFC
ALDI
*Misleading 😮😮😮😮 Isaac Newton discovered gravity NOT EINSTEIN!!!*
This guy made some jokes, and cheated many people claiming his theories are true. He is a Joker.
All aging same..
Time is objective and Absolute...
Relativity time is illusion....
Einstein sci-fi crap...!!!😂
Your statement is an absolute in & of itself. Always strive for open engagement when making statements with the purpose of contesting common theories, otherwise your credibility on the matter will be negatively marred. How would you describe the evidence of time gaps based upon the speed of objects relative from one another?