Fun video as always Cheyne. You sound pretty conflicted. I'm of the opinion with Rolex that your first love is the one you'll always love. I started with an Explorer II and ran through most of the models. What do I have now....an Explorer II (black dial). I love the white just as much and could barely decide which dial color to go for. I say all that to say, selling them all to get a GMT won't do the trick for you. You'll always come back to the Explorer II. Interestingly I like the Explorer 40 next best of your three. It is vastly superior in the elegance department. If one had to go I think the odd man out is the Submariner. I like the Sub, but with your style Explorer II and Explorer all day long!
I have a black dial Explorer 2. I’ve been through a ton of watches, but the Explorer 2, it’s about as close to perfection for me as can be. I wear it everywhere, and love it. The black dial works fine with a suit too. Not sure about the GMTs, it’s a more flashy dressy watch I think, which is cool, but not sure it’s me. I get a lot of glances and comments about the Explorer 2, watch guys love seeing them in the wild, I’ve never seen anyone else wearing one.
@@mkyhou1160 Yeah, I have only seen 2 current versions of the Rolex Explorer II out in the wild. It is a great watch and I love my Explorer II, I'm do agree the GMT Master might be a bit flash, but I love that 40mm sizing. Hopefully after a few weeks of wearing it i can scratch of that flashyness. Cheers
Awesome video. I had the same dilemma that you discussed towards the end of the video. I owned the explorer ii and the submariner at the same time. I loved the tool watch aspect of each piece but didn’t love the idea of owning multiple Rolex watches. The answer became clear to me one day when I decided to sell both and purchase the GMT master 116710LN. It has the GMT function of the explorer ii and the looks of the submariner given that it has a black ceramic bezel. When I bought the GMT I also purchased a submariner bracelet which fits the watch perfectly (ADs are now allowing you to purchase bracelets individually from them). To me now this is the perfect blend while still being a highly dependable tool watch. Maybe this will help with some of your decision making. Thanks for all your content!
chiming in to say i arrived at a similar conclusion. LN has been on the wrist almost every day for 4+ years. If on Sub bracelet (great choice) the most versatile tool watch from Rolex. I wear mine with PCL which I was initially concerned about but I love them. One thing I miss when wearing Polar is the thing kinda goes dead (looks wise) in a lot of artificial lighting circumstances, so not as fun to create memories with with family/outings. It's cool to take your tool watch out at night and have it dress up nicely.
This video was very much worth the wait!!! This is probably the most comprehensive Rolex video on UA-cam. From a tool perspective, the Explorer 2 is best! It has a date, is “under the radar”, is tough, is legible, has a gmt function, and the orange hand gives it so much personality. I just went on a 7-mile run and didn’t have to think about messing up the watch once, nor did I think about “standing out” for the wrong reasons because of it. From a “tool” perspective, I’m not sure the GMT Master II is a tool watch since it can be very flashy-it also seems like it wouldn’t be best for dings and scratches. The GMT Master II lineup also symbolizes the complete opposite of an explorer ii, where it epitomizes Rolex as a jewelry watch. I think it’s best to narrow the collection down to two--one for outdoors (exp II) and one other watch for more formal events (your choice). With all of that said, given the functionality of the submariner, what is it that you don’t like about the watch that you don’t adore it more than the others? It seems that there is something you don’t connect with as much with the submariner vs. when you talk about the toughness of the exp II or the elegance/versatility of the exp 40… Nonetheless, Keep up the great work!
All very well put, the GMT master is so appealing to me because it has the same great movement as the Explorer II, with that rotating bezel. Yes it is a little flashy, I hope to scratch it up rather quickly to take off that "shine". Sorry if it didn't come across in the video, I love the Submariner. It might be because I wear it the least. I try not to take it as much to place of extreme temp fluctuations to save and help protect the water proofing gaskets. Since I do take it diving, swimming and surfing. I guess I haven't made the memories with like the Explorers. Since it is more my "around town" watch. Still tho, I love it. Cheers
@@JakeLian I won't say I need a rotating bezel, but its so helpful to have a rotating bezel to time my hikes, longer camera exposures and so on. Like I mentioned in the video, I use my Rolex Submariner rotating bezel 5 or 6 times a day when I'm wearing it.
Two things. First, you don't need all of these, its ok to sell one or two, especially if you bought a 4th one. Second, about the looks vs function. You are a big minority here. 90% of all Rolex are bought from ad by people who dont even know they must screw in the crown before going into water, meaning they know nothing about watches at all, they buy the Sub or the Datejust just for the flex of having a Rolex. So looks and design choices are curated toward finance bros who spend money in the office and fancy dinners. Explorer II is the exception in the Rolex catalog from this.
I see where you're coming from and do think the Explorer II is the exception in the Rolex catalog from this. However I don't mind a little "posh" design in some of the Rolex watches to elevate overall versatility. As long as they remain tool watches at heart. Cheers
@@HerschelLaCroix actually they are tool watches. They are, and have always been purpose built. Sure they are more expensive than others and they've come into this perception as being luxury pieces. Still tough as nails.
@@HerschelLaCroix So your saying pieces of jewelry (Rolex Watches) keeps better time then your slim definition of a tool watch (Seiko watches). I don't understand this thought process. Why don't you think the Rolex watches in this video are tool watches? I'm coming from personal experience of depending on watches while working in the field for over 25 years. Rolex watches have proven to be the most accurate, durable and reliable. What is your reason for think otherwise?
@@HerschelLaCroixto some people $10,000 and $500 are basically two inconsequential amounts to spend on a watch. So they’d rather wear a Rolex than a Seiko. The Rolex is objectively better and it’s what their friends are wearing too.
Another great video!! You’re correct in my opinion, there’s no wrong answer but that my money is with one of the 2 Explorers! Can’t wait for the next one!
Great to see you back! First off, fully agree they are not luxury items as such. The purpose is to use them in the way it was meant for. Owning the Explorer I and II it is a close race. Although I have eyed a five digit sub for a long time if only going for one watch the sub would be out. Having made extensive travel with both Explorers I would most likely go for the Explorer II (due to the GMT). They work both at home and away. However the only caviot is that for some of the trips where a Rolex have not been the most ideal watch to wear the Explorer has been the far better choice. So.... with that said, to me; the combo of the two makes them complement each other while the Sub overlaps. But it also comes down to which complication you use/need the most. GMT or dive function? Eitherway each is useless unless you use them 😉
Yeah it is a tough one. I can say I use the GMT function by far the most, but, but and but. There is so much that goes into I would hate to lose any of these watches. Will have to see. Cheers
Great video. What do you think comfort wise between the Submariner and the Explorer 2? If you’re wearing one for weeks at a time, which would be more comfortable?
@@off-roadingcars thank you. On the bracelet the Submariner is more comfortable if I’m wearing day after day without taking it off. Switch to a canvas, rubber or leather strap there about the same. Cheers
The problem you’re having is that you’re a watch enthusiast, meaning that you like too many things about your watches to see any one of them as better than the others. Just like the rest of us, the minute you start wearing one, you immediately start thinking about the other haha
Hi, Cheyne, The Explorer 2 was your first Rolex I believe as a result it will have a special place in your heart In honesty the Explorer 2 looks the most rugged of all Rolex timepieces and a lot of your lifestyle fits this watch The Explorer is a very classy watch and can do anything The Sub really is a flex watch and mostly worn by desk divers The Explorer 2 should be your everyday watch Great video mate
@@dalewood6361 All good points, your right the Explorer II is an excellent timepiece for my day to day and if it came down to it I don’t think I could let it go. Cheers
Another great production. Very interesting to hear your pros and cons for your different Rolex'es. I got my 226570 Polar about three months ago, and coming from a 44 mm Breitling Superocean the Polar feels almost nimble and more of a "luxury item". Which is is not, of course. It has also, more or less from the moment I received it, been living on a grey NATO strap. Makes it very comfortable to wear for days, and also very easy to adjust depending on temperature/environment. With a proper tool, it is quick to put the Oyester back on for those more dressy occasions. So maybe a high quality NATO could be something to consider, from time to time...?
Thank you, Yes that is a very go point, I'm trying out some new straps from Artem on all my watches, I'll have some videos about how I like those coming out soon. I agree for being 42mm the Rolex Explorer II is a very comfortable watch and coming from a 44mm I'm sure it feels very nimble. How thick is the Breitling Superocean? Good looking watch. Cheers
@@cheynewalls The Superocean is 14 mm thick (it's a 2021-model) but to me feels quite balanced due to its 44 mm size. Looking forward to your videos on the Artem straps!
Great video, I'm a long time fan of how you use the Rolex watches in the field. I think the GMT black/grey on jubilee would fit the bill as a one watch. It's the most subtle GMT in terms of bezel color (more versatile), has the GMT function, 40mm even, rotatable bezel, and the jubilee bracelet dresses it up for when you have to wear a suit. Also, the jubilee is soooo comfortable because the smaller links articulate better on the wrist for temperature changes. If you had to go with two rolexes only, then the explorer 1 and explorer 2.
Thank you! That is exactly what I'm thinking with the Rolex GMT Master II. Its a good overall fit for me. We will see, I'm on the "list" for a Rolex GMT Master II, not sure if I need to or should keep the other watches. I'll keep you posted on upcoming videos. Cheers
Great video- very informative and honest. I have an EX2 polar and a 90s GMT II "Coke", so old aluminum bezel. Bought both new. Love both, and won't sell either, BUT if I had to pick... I'd choose the GMT II. Just a bulletproof watch and design, doesn't draw too much attention, and fits every occasion (wore it at my wedding). I have put it through the wringer for 20+ years. Still performs flawlessly. You should pick up the GMT and see if it's your perfect every occasion watch. Don't sell the others unless you have to. They all tell a story, and have great memories attached. Thanks again for the great content- looking forward to more videos. Cheers!
For me the Explorer II is perfect. Best size to be a proper men's sport watch. The Explorer I is too delicate and shiny for my taste. The Sub is nice but I prefer by far pre ceramic models. That's why I love my Tudor BB41 Monochrome Master Chronometer : plus one second / full week and 15 000 gauss magnetic resistance.
Having been lucky enough to have gotten multiple Rolex over the last 25 yrs, I regretted selling the few that I have and enjoy wearing the ones that I have. Have kept the rest to enjoy and pass down to family members like my no date 2019 sub to my son in law this year for his wedding present. If you can, keep them all and enjoy wearing and collecting. All the best.
Yeah, I think those are wise words. I would love to hold on to all of them and I'll do my best to. You are right, would be great to hand them down to family members. Cheers
Great video, as always. I say keep the Polar Explorer II and Submariner. Sell the Explorer 40. You can switch watches each trip you take to continue to making memories with them. Cheers!
Good video all in all. As far as the watch for you, I’d say the Explorer II seems to be the one to keep if you’re going to down size the collection. It’s a lot more durable, has the date function you like, and easiest to see in low light, gmt function etc. The other option IMO if you’re staying with Rolex would be to go GMT Master II. You would gain the rotating bezel and still retain all the same function as the Explorer II. Also get a small pop of color(s). 🍻
I think Explorer ii doesn’t have a bezel cuz having a bezel actually makes the watch more vulnerable based on my experience. I got my Seamaster 300 serviced to change its ceramic bezel to a new one cuz it was cracked when I accidentally hit it on a rock while scuba-diving. Wasn’t even a hard smash since I was in water. So it leads to an idea that having no bezel IS the aspect that helps Explorer ii a real tool watch ironically haha. So, salute to ur choice, I’ll say. I’ve seen some experts around me who have worn Exp ii to do extreme activities such as climbing Everest. I’m always seeing some dudes saying,“woo~ Pepsi and Daytona would beat them all,” but we’re talking about a real ultimate tool watch that’d be even more reliable than g-shock :/
Very well put. The Rolex Explorer II is something special. I have faith in the ceramic bezel, if you saw my earlier video on the Rolex Submariner, I smashed it into a rock, while trying to get pics of an Eagle flying by and no damage. That changed my view of ceramic bezel. Sorry to hear about your Seamaster, might have just hit in the exact wrong spot. Cheers
@@drkesrf I'm so impressed with my Ceramic Submariner. I have slammed that bezel against rocks, drop that watch onto a wooden floor and not even a chip. That metal ring around the ceramic and the Rolex ceramic itself is so durable.
Love the Rolex Explorer 36 and 40. I'm just missing that date function. If I'm going on a two week excursion out into the wilderness, it would nice to know the date, keep track on when I need to head back into town. Cheers
I'm in the same place as you, just recently collected my 3rd Rolex. I just recently got in line for a 1908 and a Daytona. Totally get what you mean about wanting a variety of sizes.
I very much like the Rolex Explorer 36mm, its just my personal preference to wear a bit bigger watch. That is why I went with the Rolex Explorer 40, all the great things of the Explorer 36mm in a bigger size. Cheers
@cheynewalls I get your consideration of going smaller and lighter esp on long excusions. I've worn the sub and explorer 2 on my adventure rides, and you definitely feel it. You could consider a vintage Tudor Submariner. 94110 Blue Dial. I know people say you don't wear a vintage watch as it was originally intended. But your channel does things that others don't. Also, the thing wears amazingly well. Plus the blue color will give the collection some dynamic.
I've been going back and forth on the sub date and black explorer 2 for a year. I just can't decide. I appreciate your videos for sure. One of my sticking points is that I have a 42mm Pelagos that I love and don't want to replace, and I'm afraid a sub would kick it out of the collection.
That could very well happen. I'm have a similar dilemma with my Rolex Explorer40 doing that to my Submariner. Sadly I'm mostly wearing my Sub during water activities days. The Explorer40 has taken over as the every day watch. Cheers
Do you need 3 Rolex tool watches of course not 😂, but you've been blessed by being able to own them so enjoy them! I just bought my Explorer II black dial and was thinking a sub would be my next watch, but was thinking the same thing why? Ive started to think about a OP Silver dial for a more refined watch for all occasions. I'm not a polished center links kid of guy. Great videos sir keep it up!
I’ve been fortunate to own a 2008 Sub date, a 39mm then 36mm & now 40mm Explorer 1. I’ve also had a 2020 Sub date and a Tudor Pelagos date. 5 lume markers fell out of the Pelagos when I wore it in the shower once. I have a Tudor Ranger but the lume is very short lasting. My collection now is an Explorer 40 & my favourite watch ever (so far) a 116710LN GMT Master 2 black bezel on an oyster bracelet. Sub’s became to common and I’ve only come across one other GMT wearer, the day after I bought mine it was a root beer. Good luck with your decisions 🙂👍
As an enthusiast, yes you need all 3 🤣 but practically speaking you can get by with the Explorer 40 (for comfort and dressier occasions) and just one of the other two pieces. I would lean towards keeping the Explorer 2 since it has the GMT function and white dial to balance the Explorer 40’s black dial. Im in a similar predicament as I keep going back and forth because I want a GMT Master but I also have a Sub and they’re pretty redundant aside from the GMT function. They both look similar and both can handle the same occasions pretty much.
Indeed all 3 would be the best. We'll see, like you the GMT Master II is very intriguing to me, but it would repetitive in my collection if I keep all the watches. Cheers
Not a diver, own the Sub and use it as an overall tool watch, too. Timing hikes, etc. - just as you do. Always have to justify myself, as people have this misconception about Rolex as a show-off luxury watch. Just not true. To me, it‘s an outdoor tool. 🤙🏻 Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Great video! I agree with you about the Exp II being perfect if the bezel rotated. Even if they made it so it would simply slide bi-directionally, it would be so handy. Sounds like you may be gravitating toward a GMT Master II! I really like the look & “tooliness” of the older black-bezel GMT Masters (16700)…I’ve got a Squale that looks just like one. I probably should just sell everything I have, get one, & be done with it…
@@cheynewalls btw in regards to your larger philosophical question, variety is the spice of life vs the emotional benefits of one high quality piece… it’s the great debate. I know you’re in the content creation business and not necessarily on the consumer side, but The Random Watch Dude on UA-cam has also been wrestling with this question recently. You might enjoy his content.
"I just wanted one watch and done"....Famous last words for a collector. If you're looking to pare it down, I'd lose the Sub. The Explorer 1 is definitely the most versatile and the only one that can work as a dressy watch. The Explorer 11 is probably the only true modern tool watch Rolex makes, and you use yours as a tool. The sub is a classic, but it's also the most pedestrian watch Rolex. And frankly, it's got negative vibes for plenty of people. But having a great diver that you really will swim in the ocean or a river with is a must (for me, at least). Tudor stands out to me as being in that sweet spot between having a watch of impeccable quality, being tough enough to handle work, and affordable enough where you appreciate their value, but you're not worried about breaking or losing something worth a used car.
Loose the Sub? Worst advice I have ever heard... If I have to part with one of them and I had the same 3: "Explorer I" would be one. You NEVER part with a Sub - it should be the last choice. Really, really terrible and dumb advice from a normie....
Hi I know you are trying to compare these watches as tool watches but most collectors don't just buy them for the best function as a practical watch for the adventure they want them for. So as you have said it can't be just the function of the watch it's about the person who owns the watch and there desires for owning the watch. For me it's the explorer 2 the sea dweller and the James Cameron all different in there own way and if I had to pick one it's so hard (probably the sea dweller) interesting video thanks John 👍.
The Explorer 2 fits your personality better out of three. For dressier occasions you can get a datejust or OP41 instead of Explorer 40 And Submariner is just the best all-around watch to keep it forever:)
Keep the explorer for more formal, and one of the other two. I guess the sub is more versatile because of the bezel for timing. Do you really need gmt?
I don't need it, but its so helpful with all the traveling I do. To know, doesn't matter what time zone I'm in, that I need to have all business matters completed by the time that orange GMT hands hits that arrow between 16 and 18 is a big help. Cheers
Yeah, sounds about right. One of the reasons I love to wear my 124060 in cold days with the caveat that "I won the bad type" and mine loses no more than a second a day, no matter the position, which I get annoyed by but it is still within specs. Anyway, really though watch and my grail in my collection.
@@cheynewalls Well I found a way to "regulate" him with different positions, so it can be extremely accurate, but I don't have to convince you :D What you seek with the Explorer 2 and the bezel is named GMT Master II. Check the M126710GRNR-0003 variation (same one you showed but with the jubilee) Triple lock is exclusive to the diving line of Rolex, for me the answer is easy as I also want the GMT II Master and DJ41. They suit my taste. Modest, stoic, well made with low to no garish. Rather sell the Omega and Breitling you have. I also have a Breitling - the Navitimer AB0120 and while he is a looker, I torment him the least out of all mine, since with his 30M WR I don't wanna push it and I keep hem away from "extreme" situations especially when labor work might be required around the house or something like that. If I was in need to let go of something for some cash - he would be the one to sell, as much as I love him - he cannot compare to my Sub.
I have both a submariner date and the 40mm Explorer. Of the two I think I prefer wearing the Explorer. If I could have a submariner with its 300m depth rating with the explorer dial it would be the perfect watch for me.
Nice vedio bro and interesting topic, yes we as watch lovers, keep buying lot of watch, at the end we asking our self same question, Do we need all thus watches? I been watching your vedio long time, your lifestyle is much casual and advanture, My advice, keep explorer 2 and get either oyster perpetual or datejust for formal ware.
If it’s Rolex only, I’d say sell the sub and exp 40. Consider either GMT master or yachtmaster. GMT has rotating bezel but it won’t patina. Yachtmaster has 42 mm which seems closer to your size preferences and has titanium option but the bezel is ceramic. The 40 mm YM has a platinum bezel that can patina. Also the YM bezel is bi-directional which is a little more convenient for timing
Yeah definitely, the GMT would complement your Exp II nicely in a 2 watch setup. A GMT with a jubilee bracelet would lean more dressy but still fulfill the role of the Exp II in a pinch or vice versa.
I would place a bet that you got a GMT-Master II. Congratulations if you did. The GMT-Master II is my favorite Rolex on paper. On the wrist it is way too shiny and jewelry-like for me but is a great watch. I feel that the Explorer II is the more low-key tool watch version of the GMT-Master with only one less function due to the fixed bezel.
You'll have to stay tone and see. I agree its a bit to shiny for me, but a few days rock climbing, getting a bit gnarled up will get ride of that shine and I think give it a great look. Cheers
I have the Explorer 40 and Submariner. I love all of them though. DO NOT SELL ANY OF THESE! Keep them all unless you need the money. You'll regret it later and it'll be harder to get back. Plus it won't be the same watch. Just keep them. I understand when you get several watches (I have 9 now) you start questioning yourself and if you need them all. I set 9 as my limit and if I want another one of these has to go. Maybe set a limit like that for yourself and stick to it. Great content and keep them coming. Again, unless you need the money don't sell any of these!
Very good advice, thank you that. I'm at that point of questioning myself if I need them all. That is a great idea to set a limit. I'll keep you posted. Cheers
Huge Sub fan here, but Explorer II is THE ultimate mountaineering watch in my book. It’s no coincidence that it was a primary choice by the SAS. Note: I am curious know how the Breitling failed you btw. Been owing a titanium Chrono Avenger E13360 16 years+ and it’s by a country mile the most robust watch I have experienced (y more robust than Explorer ). I have taken it through absolute hell and back (got the marks to prove it) yet hasn’t missed a beat.
Yeah, the Rolex Explorer II does it all and a great fit when I'm out mountaineering. I've heard that from a lot of Breitling owners, I love the look of their watches and should give Breitling another look. I might of had some bad luck with the watch and AD experience. After only about 6 month of having my Aviator 8 B01 Chronograph Mosquito (still think its one of the best looking watch of all time) I took it hiking out in the Utah slot canyons. I was running the Chronograph to time my hike and noticed when I reset the watch back at camp, the seconds hand wouldn't reset correctly. I didn't remember hit it on anything and didn't notice any damage to the watch. Took it to the AD to get fixed and they told me I shouldn't have been running the Chronograph while hiking, therefore they wouldn't fix it under warranty. So I was a bit upset at Breitling. This could have all been bad luck, I hear nothing but good things about the brand, might have to give them a second chance. Cheers
The only Rolex I can think that combines the rotating bezel, GMT function and white dial is the GMT Master 2 meteorite, but it’s solid white gold, maybe the shine would scare the bears off. Btw, I want to know your opinion of the Jeep Gladiator since you’ve reviewed your Toyota Tacoma, do you recommend it as reliable and outdoorsman type?
lol, Can you imagine a white gold meteorite dial Rolex GMT out in the wilderness, that would be a sight. I like the Jeep Gladiator, a lot of my friends have them. Very good & capable truck up until about 100k, after 100,000 miles they start having major issues. Cheers
I have all the three watches. I also have another one; my fourth is Date Just 41 Wimbledon. I would say it’s a different feeling coming from field watches to a professional type watch. These days I only wear the date just. On occasion wear the explorer. Haven’t worn the sub and explorer 2 in a long time!
I love all three of these watches and I understand what you are saying, sometimes my Explorer II loses out on wear time when I'm not travel and I feel kind of bad about it.
Thanks, I like the Tudor FXD, I don't however like that the bezel is a count down bezel, going 50 40 30. Easier for me to have the conventional format. Cheers
@@cheynewalls I get that. Although I think that the count down bezel on the Marine national is great for everyday use like cooking timing to a target. If you prefer a conventional bezel the Black Tudor FXD has a normal elapsed time bezel.
Cheyne, I disagree with others. These watches have different movements, different case designs, and as you said preference is everything..I told you the explorer 2 after the freezer test.. but as a datejust 41 owner (which has measured smaller) maybe the explorer 40.
The sub is a DIVER’s watch. For outdoors hiking/climbing: X sub has ceramic bezel X Explorer has no date ☑️ Explorer II - most legible, best lume, date and GMT for hiking in Europe, indestructible bezel.
Well that is what I like a lot about the Rolex Submariner, it can be both. I can wear it when I go scuba driving (and have means times) also I can wear it hiking or out in the wilderness.
A tool watch for me is time only and a means to track a period of time (mins / hours) The Submariner is my pic. However, since I'm not a fan of the shiny maxi case, the Black Bay 54 gives me the smaller charm that suits everything I need. Its built like a tank but if it dies, I'm not down £8k. Great video
I like the Tudor Black Bay 54, great watch. Yeah, like I mentioned in the video, everyone needs of like different aspects of tool watches. I personal really like that date function with with all the traveling I do.
Good video again, Cheyne! Well, it's a hard decision. If you don't need something dressy, I go with you and with the Explorer II (but only the polar). Answering your other question - you never can have enough ROLEX watches in your collection. Even if they have very often the same or very similar calibers, they all are so different in so many ways. Have a nice day, PROST!
@@cheynewalls I wanted to sub my whole adult life and finally got one. There was a time where I was considering a GMT until I realized they only have a 24click bezel on the ceramics. That was a change that makes sense for the GMT but totally ruined it for me.
@@cheynewalls More differentiation makes sense for Rolex but like I said, the 24 click essentially makes it a useless bezel for timing with a 2.5 minute resolution. 60 or 120 click with bi directional rotation would be ideal for a one and done. Keep the videos coming, you do a great job
I always thought that the Explorer 40 should have the crown guard instead of the Air King. The Explorer is basically an OP with a different dial and hands; they should make it a little more unique. I'm also not sure why the price difference is $1,300, even when the OP is 1mm larger.
I said this when you got the Explorer 40 but I really don't think you need three of basically the same Rolex. I would have explored other brands at this point. To your point about assembly, all Rolexe's are mostly machine made. The only assembly step that requires human hands is dropping the movement into the case. Everything else is automated
Good to know about the assembly process. To your point about trying other brands, I have, many. Rolex was the last of about 20 different brands over 25 years. I'm just so impressed with Rolex timepieces I don't see myself looking at other brands until I move into more high horology. Cheers
As a photographer myself … tho a hobby… just put a stop watch (count up & down type) on your tripod & keep the Explorer 2… which I have also. Problem solved. 🙂
Its easier for me to just wear a wrist watch, a stop watch would just be another thing to add to my bag and like Quartz watches batteries always going flat on me when I'm out camping in subzero temp. Don't have that issue with mechanical watches, my tool watches are a better easier fit for me. Also if you didn't notice, it takes two hands to work my technical camera, again easiest to look at my wrist.
Smaller is better generally. More comfortable, more elegant, still legible, not trying to show off, etc. however i will say that once in a blue moon its fun to wear a bigger watch.
I think the submariner might be a great choice as it is the most iconic and also the timer can be helpful for many different things. My question is in regards to the GMTs, what’s the point of the rotating bezel and how will it be helpful?
I have really important question😅 You can test it in fields btw. Is there any differences in accuracy etc. between Rolex "tool" models and simple every day watches like OP or DJ? Keep going, mate!
Preceramic Rolexes are by far the best ones IMO. Ceramic 👎. Full steel Daytona is the best watch among Rolexes... For Longines, the best one is full titanium Spirit 40mm... For Tudor, the best one is Pelagos FXD....
I use to think the same thing, but I'm so impressed with my Ceramic Submariner. I have slammed that bezel against rocks, drop that watch onto a wooden floor and not even a chip. That metal ring around the ceramic and the Rolex ceramic itself is so durable.
The spirit of Rolex is that of a tool watch. While the Submariner is THE iconic watch,…it is ubiquitous/played out and associated with desk divers. IMHO the Explorer II represents what Rolex was and what should be. Explorer II with the steel bezel is unmatched.
if your not in need of financial aiding to add the gmt2, then maybe don't sell any until you tried all four. once you sell them, it's gone. you might want to buy it again, and it will be a bumber rebuying them. allin all, seems like your enjoying your watch life!
@@cheynewalls I put my name down on the day it was released .... it is absolutely amazing.... I've no problems letting both my Polar Explorer 2 and Good Planet GMT go in order to fund it.... I believe the Master 2 is the ultimate 1 watch Rolex collection
1.) Rolex are luxury tool watches. The brand, the price point, and the purpose/use-cases. Paying over $7K USD for an Explorer 36/40, over $9.5K for an Explorer 2, and damn near $10K USD for a Submariner, while having to wait for a call from months to years due to high demand and alleged low-supply, is all luxury. 2.) The Polar Explorer 2 is the the ultimate tool watch, but the Explorer 1 is by far the best GADA in terms wearing it on a hike, to the beach, and in more formal attire. The Explorer 1 really does it all (sans the date). With that being said, if you absolutely need the date, want a classier piece that is still toolish, and still need the GMT, then going for that Bruce Wayne GMT is definitely a good move. 3.) We both know the point of the Explorer 2 steel non-rotational bezel was to ensure that spelunkers wouldn't knock their bezel in a cave and mess up what time they were tracking without any sunlight, or break the bezel if it wasn't steel. So a rotating bezel on a Explorer 2 doesn't fit the use case. If you are fine with knocking a rotating ceramic bezel around then that can still work with the Bruce Wayne GMT. 4.) The community really wants Rolex to bring the Explorer 2 back to down to a 40mm size again due to it being such a beefcake.
@@BLR653 A 36mm Explorer for women and a 58mm Invicta are two really ridiculous extremes. I much prefer my Omega Planet Ocean 43.5mm. Omega watches for Alpha males.
Great tool watches, but I'm a big fan of the newer movements with the Paramagnetic hairspring & Paraflex shock absorption. I have a buddy who wears an aluminum bezel GMT Master 2 and his, with all the airport travel he does, gets magnetized every time after a week or two of constantly going in and out of airport security. I don't want to have to worry about that. Cheers
I have a submariner, omega seamaster and a Tudor. I only wear my sub and I ask myself the same question almost every week. My only justification is handing them down to my kids or trading them in for another watch.
Well, I think you're a bit over simplifying, Yes that 8 dollar thermometer might work for a year or so then you need to replace it every year. Or what if the 8 dollar thermometer breaks a 100 miles from the nearest place where you can get a replacement it? Not to mention if I'm meeting with potential clients and they see me using the cheapest, lowest quality equipment "8 dollar thermometer" they might question the final products quality.
@@cheynewalls I have seen many go through all the different Rolex models and end up with one watch collection. All you need is just one Rolex. Explorer 2 is a great one watch collection.
@@cheynewalls You know, in the army 90% of the combat soldier are using G-Shock. If it good for soldier, it goid for camping. Not to mansion that mecanical watch is very fragile for intensiv sports use . Today almost all G-Shock are solar powered. So in the end all that you said is non valid.
@@danield6815 I’m just speaking from personal experience. Don’t get me wrong, I like G-shocks, but they’re not good in with long term exposure to subzero temperatures. I’ve broken 3 G-shocks over the last 4 years. Haven’t had an issue with my Rolex mechanical watch. Yes the Army use them, one they’re not using in subzero environments, two they’re inexpensive to replace. Militaries all over the world used mechanical watches until a less expensive option came available.
Absolutely love your content, picked up an Explorer 40 myself a few weeks back and it's been a great daily watch. We talk nightly about watches on the ArchieLuxuryLivestream channel. You should pop by as many of us have similar tastes in watches as you, would be cool for others to learn about your show!
So you think it smarter for me to buy a $50 watch and once it breaks after a few weeks go and buy another one? Therefor I'm buying, breaking, throwing away and then re-buying a different watch every few weeks? What is wrong with just buying a well built quality timepiece that will last generations?
Had the explorer 2 and wanted the sub, ended up getting a Batman and never looked back. I came to the same conclusion you are. BUT I also want an explorer 1
You haven't seen my other have you. I have the problem with Quartz watches batteries always going flat on me when I'm out camping in subzero temp. Don't have that issue with mechanical watches.
Yes. You need all three.
Love it, Cheers
Fun video as always Cheyne. You sound pretty conflicted. I'm of the opinion with Rolex that your first love is the one you'll always love. I started with an Explorer II and ran through most of the models. What do I have now....an Explorer II (black dial). I love the white just as much and could barely decide which dial color to go for. I say all that to say, selling them all to get a GMT won't do the trick for you. You'll always come back to the Explorer II.
Interestingly I like the Explorer 40 next best of your three. It is vastly superior in the elegance department. If one had to go I think the odd man out is the Submariner. I like the Sub, but with your style Explorer II and Explorer all day long!
Thank you. All very good points and yes your first Rolex holds a special place. Thank you for your thoughtful insight. Cheers
I have a black dial Explorer 2. I’ve been through a ton of watches, but the Explorer 2, it’s about as close to perfection for me as can be. I wear it everywhere, and love it. The black dial works fine with a suit too. Not sure about the GMTs, it’s a more flashy dressy watch I think, which is cool, but not sure it’s me. I get a lot of glances and comments about the Explorer 2, watch guys love seeing them in the wild, I’ve never seen anyone else wearing one.
@@mkyhou1160 Yeah, I have only seen 2 current versions of the Rolex Explorer II out in the wild. It is a great watch and I love my Explorer II, I'm do agree the GMT Master might be a bit flash, but I love that 40mm sizing. Hopefully after a few weeks of wearing it i can scratch of that flashyness. Cheers
Awesome video. I had the same dilemma that you discussed towards the end of the video. I owned the explorer ii and the submariner at the same time. I loved the tool watch aspect of each piece but didn’t love the idea of owning multiple Rolex watches. The answer became clear to me one day when I decided to sell both and purchase the GMT master 116710LN. It has the GMT function of the explorer ii and the looks of the submariner given that it has a black ceramic bezel. When I bought the GMT I also purchased a submariner bracelet which fits the watch perfectly (ADs are now allowing you to purchase bracelets individually from them).
To me now this is the perfect blend while still being a highly dependable tool watch. Maybe this will help with some of your decision making. Thanks for all your content!
Thank you for this, very helpful. I think that is the route I'm going to go. Cheers
@@cheynewalls Very cool! I can’t wait to see the video on it.
chiming in to say i arrived at a similar conclusion. LN has been on the wrist almost every day for 4+ years. If on Sub bracelet (great choice) the most versatile tool watch from Rolex. I wear mine with PCL which I was initially concerned about but I love them. One thing I miss when wearing Polar is the thing kinda goes dead (looks wise) in a lot of artificial lighting circumstances, so not as fun to create memories with with family/outings. It's cool to take your tool watch out at night and have it dress up nicely.
@@TropicalMBA Thanks for the insight, Cheers
Amazing video!! Love how you incorporate the Rolex watches with travel and adventure, not to mention a bear encounter.
Cheers, thank you Ian
This video was very much worth the wait!!! This is probably the most comprehensive Rolex video on UA-cam.
From a tool perspective, the Explorer 2 is best! It has a date, is “under the radar”, is tough, is legible, has a gmt function, and the orange hand gives it so much personality. I just went on a 7-mile run and didn’t have to think about messing up the watch once, nor did I think about “standing out” for the wrong reasons because of it.
From a “tool” perspective, I’m not sure the GMT Master II is a tool watch since it can be very flashy-it also seems like it wouldn’t be best for dings and scratches. The GMT Master II lineup also symbolizes the complete opposite of an explorer ii, where it epitomizes Rolex as a jewelry watch.
I think it’s best to narrow the collection down to two--one for outdoors (exp II) and one other watch for more formal events (your choice).
With all of that said, given the functionality of the submariner, what is it that you don’t like about the watch that you don’t adore it more than the others? It seems that there is something you don’t connect with as much with the submariner vs. when you talk about the toughness of the exp II or the elegance/versatility of the exp 40…
Nonetheless, Keep up the great work!
All very well put, the GMT master is so appealing to me because it has the same great movement as the Explorer II, with that rotating bezel. Yes it is a little flashy, I hope to scratch it up rather quickly to take off that "shine".
Sorry if it didn't come across in the video, I love the Submariner. It might be because I wear it the least. I try not to take it as much to place of extreme temp fluctuations to save and help protect the water proofing gaskets. Since I do take it diving, swimming and surfing. I guess I haven't made the memories with like the Explorers. Since it is more my "around town" watch. Still tho, I love it. Cheers
@@cheynewalls"the GMT master II is so appealing to me as the Explorer II, with that rotating bezel." ..... and you need a rotating bezel,why? 😂
@@JakeLian I won't say I need a rotating bezel, but its so helpful to have a rotating bezel to time my hikes, longer camera exposures and so on. Like I mentioned in the video, I use my Rolex Submariner rotating bezel 5 or 6 times a day when I'm wearing it.
Did you even watch the video@@JakeLian
Two things. First, you don't need all of these, its ok to sell one or two, especially if you bought a 4th one. Second, about the looks vs function. You are a big minority here. 90% of all Rolex are bought from ad by people who dont even know they must screw in the crown before going into water, meaning they know nothing about watches at all, they buy the Sub or the Datejust just for the flex of having a Rolex. So looks and design choices are curated toward finance bros who spend money in the office and fancy dinners. Explorer II is the exception in the Rolex catalog from this.
I see where you're coming from and do think the Explorer II is the exception in the Rolex catalog from this. However I don't mind a little "posh" design in some of the Rolex watches to elevate overall versatility. As long as they remain tool watches at heart. Cheers
@@cheynewallsThese are not tool watches; they are pieces of jewelery. If you want a tool watch, go get a Seiko. Stop fooling yourself.
@@HerschelLaCroix actually they are tool watches. They are, and have always been purpose built. Sure they are more expensive than others and they've come into this perception as being luxury pieces. Still tough as nails.
@@HerschelLaCroix So your saying pieces of jewelry (Rolex Watches) keeps better time then your slim definition of a tool watch (Seiko watches). I don't understand this thought process. Why don't you think the Rolex watches in this video are tool watches? I'm coming from personal experience of depending on watches while working in the field for over 25 years. Rolex watches have proven to be the most accurate, durable and reliable. What is your reason for think otherwise?
@@HerschelLaCroixto some people $10,000 and $500 are basically two inconsequential amounts to spend on a watch. So they’d rather wear a Rolex than a Seiko. The Rolex is objectively better and it’s what their friends are wearing too.
Keep the Sub and the Explorer 2. Sell of the Explorer 1 and pick up an Omega Speedmaster Professional moon watch to add a Chrono to the collection.
I've had my eye on the Speedmaster Professional moon watch.
Rolex explorer II polar is an excellent choice but this hobby is a beautiful sickness that we as watch enthusiasts love 😂
Indeed, Cheers
Another great video!! You’re correct in my opinion, there’s no wrong answer but that my money is with one of the 2 Explorers! Can’t wait for the next one!
Cheers, Thank you!
Great to see you back!
First off, fully agree they are not luxury items as such. The purpose is to use them in the way it was meant for. Owning the Explorer I and II it is a close race. Although I have eyed a five digit sub for a long time if only going for one watch the sub would be out. Having made extensive travel with both Explorers I would most likely go for the Explorer II (due to the GMT).
They work both at home and away. However the only caviot is that for some of the trips where a Rolex have not been the most ideal watch to wear the Explorer has been the far better choice. So.... with that said, to me; the combo of the two makes them complement each other while the Sub overlaps. But it also comes down to which complication you use/need the most. GMT or dive function?
Eitherway each is useless unless you use them 😉
Yeah it is a tough one. I can say I use the GMT function by far the most, but, but and but. There is so much that goes into I would hate to lose any of these watches. Will have to see. Cheers
Great video. What do you think comfort wise between the Submariner and the Explorer 2? If you’re wearing one for weeks at a time, which would be more comfortable?
@@off-roadingcars thank you. On the bracelet the Submariner is more comfortable if I’m wearing day after day without taking it off. Switch to a canvas, rubber or leather strap there about the same. Cheers
Loved your review and thought process! Keep all three. Period.
@@martinkaplan1805 Thank you. You’re right all great watches, and it would be smart to keep all three. Cheers
could hardly wait for your video - it's finally here. Cheers. Amazing.
Cheers, I hope you enjoyed!
@@cheynewalls Yes, thanks, it was cool, as always.
@@joerghomberger9194 Cheers
The problem you’re having is that you’re a watch enthusiast, meaning that you like too many things about your watches to see any one of them as better than the others. Just like the rest of us, the minute you start wearing one, you immediately start thinking about the other haha
“The quickest way to lose interest in a watch is to buy it’. AL Breguet
Hitting the nail on the head. I've heard people say watch enthusiast is a type of disease :)
Hi, Cheyne,
The Explorer 2 was your first Rolex I believe as a result it will have a special place in your heart
In honesty the Explorer 2 looks the most rugged of all Rolex timepieces and a lot of your lifestyle fits this watch
The Explorer is a very classy watch and can do anything
The Sub really is a flex watch and mostly worn by desk divers
The Explorer 2 should be your everyday watch
Great video mate
@@dalewood6361 All good points, your right the Explorer II is an excellent timepiece for my day to day and if it came down to it I don’t think I could let it go. Cheers
Another great production. Very interesting to hear your pros and cons for your different Rolex'es. I got my 226570 Polar about three months ago, and coming from a 44 mm Breitling Superocean the Polar feels almost nimble and more of a "luxury item". Which is is not, of course.
It has also, more or less from the moment I received it, been living on a grey NATO strap. Makes it very comfortable to wear for days, and also very easy to adjust depending on temperature/environment. With a proper tool, it is quick to put the Oyester back on for those more dressy occasions. So maybe a high quality NATO could be something to consider, from time to time...?
Thank you, Yes that is a very go point, I'm trying out some new straps from Artem on all my watches, I'll have some videos about how I like those coming out soon. I agree for being 42mm the Rolex Explorer II is a very comfortable watch and coming from a 44mm I'm sure it feels very nimble. How thick is the Breitling Superocean? Good looking watch. Cheers
@@cheynewalls The Superocean is 14 mm thick (it's a 2021-model) but to me feels quite balanced due to its 44 mm size. Looking forward to your videos on the Artem straps!
@@johanfoldy8129 Cheers
Could you please demonstrate how you use the EX2 as a compass? Thanks love your vids.
I'll make sure to show that in a future video, Cheers
Great video, I'm a long time fan of how you use the Rolex watches in the field. I think the GMT black/grey on jubilee would fit the bill as a one watch. It's the most subtle GMT in terms of bezel color (more versatile), has the GMT function, 40mm even, rotatable bezel, and the jubilee bracelet dresses it up for when you have to wear a suit. Also, the jubilee is soooo comfortable because the smaller links articulate better on the wrist for temperature changes. If you had to go with two rolexes only, then the explorer 1 and explorer 2.
Thank you! That is exactly what I'm thinking with the Rolex GMT Master II. Its a good overall fit for me. We will see, I'm on the "list" for a Rolex GMT Master II, not sure if I need to or should keep the other watches. I'll keep you posted on upcoming videos. Cheers
I have Explorer & Explorer II and I feel the combo is enough.
I’m also in The list for the black/grey gmt master ii. But I’m wondering if i need it.
@@timemycollection I hear you. Sometimes less is more 😃
@@timemycollection Yeah a perfect two watch collection. I'm in the same boat about the black/grey GMT Master II.
Great video- very informative and honest. I have an EX2 polar and a 90s GMT II "Coke", so old aluminum bezel. Bought both new. Love both, and won't sell either, BUT if I had to pick... I'd choose the GMT II. Just a bulletproof watch and design, doesn't draw too much attention, and fits every occasion (wore it at my wedding). I have put it through the wringer for 20+ years. Still performs flawlessly. You should pick up the GMT and see if it's your perfect every occasion watch. Don't sell the others unless you have to. They all tell a story, and have great memories attached. Thanks again for the great content- looking forward to more videos. Cheers!
Thank you for share that, very wise words and good advice. Cheers
For me the Explorer II is perfect. Best size to be a proper men's sport watch. The Explorer I is too delicate and shiny for my taste. The Sub is nice but I prefer by far pre ceramic models. That's why I love my Tudor BB41 Monochrome Master Chronometer : plus one second / full week and 15 000 gauss magnetic resistance.
Thanks for sharing, Great watch that Tudor BB41. Cheers
Having been lucky enough to have gotten multiple Rolex over the last 25 yrs, I regretted selling the few that I have and enjoy wearing the ones that I have. Have kept the rest to enjoy and pass down to family members like my no date 2019 sub to my son in law this year for his wedding present. If you can, keep them all and enjoy wearing and collecting. All the best.
Yeah, I think those are wise words. I would love to hold on to all of them and I'll do my best to. You are right, would be great to hand them down to family members. Cheers
Great video, as always. I say keep the Polar Explorer II and Submariner. Sell the Explorer 40. You can switch watches each trip you take to continue to making memories with them. Cheers!
That would workout well, thanks. Cheers
Good video all in all.
As far as the watch for you, I’d say the Explorer II seems to be the one to keep if you’re going to down size the collection. It’s a lot more durable, has the date function you like, and easiest to see in low light, gmt function etc.
The other option IMO if you’re staying with Rolex would be to go GMT Master II. You would gain the rotating bezel and still retain all the same function as the Explorer II. Also get a small pop of color(s). 🍻
Well said, thanks for your input. Cheers
I think Explorer ii doesn’t have a bezel cuz having a bezel actually makes the watch more vulnerable based on my experience. I got my Seamaster 300 serviced to change its ceramic bezel to a new one cuz it was cracked when I accidentally hit it on a rock while scuba-diving. Wasn’t even a hard smash since I was in water. So it leads to an idea that having no bezel IS the aspect that helps Explorer ii a real tool watch ironically haha. So, salute to ur choice, I’ll say. I’ve seen some experts around me who have worn Exp ii to do extreme activities such as climbing Everest. I’m always seeing some dudes saying,“woo~ Pepsi and Daytona would beat them all,” but we’re talking about a real ultimate tool watch that’d be even more reliable than g-shock :/
Very well put. The Rolex Explorer II is something special. I have faith in the ceramic bezel, if you saw my earlier video on the Rolex Submariner, I smashed it into a rock, while trying to get pics of an Eagle flying by and no damage. That changed my view of ceramic bezel. Sorry to hear about your Seamaster, might have just hit in the exact wrong spot. Cheers
Or buy a watch with an aluminum dive bezel
@@drkesrf I'm so impressed with my Ceramic Submariner. I have slammed that bezel against rocks, drop that watch onto a wooden floor and not even a chip. That metal ring around the ceramic and the Rolex ceramic itself is so durable.
Long hikes and other endurance type sports like mountain climbing are exactly why the 36mm explorer is the best one.
Love the Rolex Explorer 36 and 40. I'm just missing that date function. If I'm going on a two week excursion out into the wilderness, it would nice to know the date, keep track on when I need to head back into town. Cheers
I'm in the same place as you, just recently collected my 3rd Rolex.
I just recently got in line for a 1908 and a Daytona. Totally get what you mean about wanting a variety of sizes.
Keep me posted on the 1908 and Daytona, such amazing watches. Cheers
What do you think of the Explorer 36mm? Might be too small on you but I think it is a super versatile watch
I very much like the Rolex Explorer 36mm, its just my personal preference to wear a bit bigger watch. That is why I went with the Rolex Explorer 40, all the great things of the Explorer 36mm in a bigger size. Cheers
@cheynewalls I get your consideration of going smaller and lighter esp on long excusions. I've worn the sub and explorer 2 on my adventure rides, and you definitely feel it. You could consider a vintage Tudor Submariner. 94110 Blue Dial. I know people say you don't wear a vintage watch as it was originally intended. But your channel does things that others don't. Also, the thing wears amazingly well. Plus the blue color will give the collection some dynamic.
Thanks for that idea, I'll look into that. Cheers
You have a great collection! A Rolex GMT surely sounds exciting, but it would be kind of sad if you parted ways with the explorer 2
All great watches, With all the sentimental value I have with my Rolex Explorer II I don't think I'll ever be able to sell it. Cheers
Keep them all. Its nice to have options. lol. I have 4 in my collection and don't want to downsize.
4 does seem like a good number for a watch collection. Cheers
I agree, Don't sell your Rolex watches
I've been going back and forth on the sub date and black explorer 2 for a year. I just can't decide. I appreciate your videos for sure. One of my sticking points is that I have a 42mm Pelagos that I love and don't want to replace, and I'm afraid a sub would kick it out of the collection.
That could very well happen. I'm have a similar dilemma with my Rolex Explorer40 doing that to my Submariner. Sadly I'm mostly wearing my Sub during water activities days. The Explorer40 has taken over as the every day watch. Cheers
Do you need 3 Rolex tool watches of course not 😂, but you've been blessed by being able to own them so enjoy them! I just bought my Explorer II black dial and was thinking a sub would be my next watch, but was thinking the same thing why? Ive started to think about a OP Silver dial for a more refined watch for all occasions. I'm not a polished center links kid of guy. Great videos sir keep it up!
@@shaungiesler6105 Very good points, yeah I’m not a big fan of the polished links either, but think they would great all beat and scratched up. Cheers
I’ve been fortunate to own a 2008 Sub date, a 39mm then 36mm & now 40mm Explorer 1. I’ve also had a 2020 Sub date and a Tudor Pelagos date. 5 lume markers fell out of the Pelagos when I wore it in the shower once. I have a Tudor Ranger but the lume is very short lasting. My collection now is an Explorer 40 & my favourite watch ever (so far) a 116710LN GMT Master 2 black bezel on an oyster bracelet. Sub’s became to common and I’ve only come across one other GMT wearer, the day after I bought mine it was a root beer. Good luck with your decisions 🙂👍
Cheers, Thanks
As an enthusiast, yes you need all 3 🤣 but practically speaking you can get by with the Explorer 40 (for comfort and dressier occasions) and just one of the other two pieces. I would lean towards keeping the Explorer 2 since it has the GMT function and white dial to balance the Explorer 40’s black dial.
Im in a similar predicament as I keep going back and forth because I want a GMT Master but I also have a Sub and they’re pretty redundant aside from the GMT function. They both look similar and both can handle the same occasions pretty much.
Indeed all 3 would be the best. We'll see, like you the GMT Master II is very intriguing to me, but it would repetitive in my collection if I keep all the watches. Cheers
@@cheynewalls the polished center links of the GMT Master would get annihilated out in the field though
@@LuxLooks that’s what I’m kind of hoping for. Would look so good all gnarled up. Get ride of some of that shine
Not a diver, own the Sub and use it as an overall tool watch, too. Timing hikes, etc. - just as you do.
Always have to justify myself, as people have this misconception about Rolex as a show-off luxury watch. Just not true. To me, it‘s an outdoor tool. 🤙🏻
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Indeed, great outdoor tools, Cheers
Great video! I agree with you about the Exp II being perfect if the bezel rotated. Even if they made it so it would simply slide bi-directionally, it would be so handy. Sounds like you may be gravitating toward a GMT Master II! I really like the look & “tooliness” of the older black-bezel GMT Masters (16700)…I’ve got a Squale that looks just like one. I probably should just sell everything I have, get one, & be done with it…
We'll have to see, love my current watches, but I'm not sure if I need all of them. I'll keep you post, Cheers
Keep the Explorer II. If it's your only watch you'll get the patina all the faster. Nice bear pics!
@@schnellguitars6128 Cheers
Great video, and a twist ending!
Sounds like you need to get a GMT Master 2 and let us know 👍
Thanks, I'll keep you posted. Cheers
@@cheynewalls btw in regards to your larger philosophical question, variety is the spice of life vs the emotional benefits of one high quality piece… it’s the great debate. I know you’re in the content creation business and not necessarily on the consumer side, but The Random Watch Dude on UA-cam has also been wrestling with this question recently. You might enjoy his content.
@@Sasquatchi Well put. Thank you, I’ll check that out, haven’t seen that channel.
"I just wanted one watch and done"....Famous last words for a collector. If you're looking to pare it down, I'd lose the Sub. The Explorer 1 is definitely the most versatile and the only one that can work as a dressy watch. The Explorer 11 is probably the only true modern tool watch Rolex makes, and you use yours as a tool. The sub is a classic, but it's also the most pedestrian watch Rolex. And frankly, it's got negative vibes for plenty of people. But having a great diver that you really will swim in the ocean or a river with is a must (for me, at least). Tudor stands out to me as being in that sweet spot between having a watch of impeccable quality, being tough enough to handle work, and affordable enough where you appreciate their value, but you're not worried about breaking or losing something worth a used car.
All very good points, Cheers
Loose the Sub?
Worst advice I have ever heard...
If I have to part with one of them and I had the same 3: "Explorer I" would be one. You NEVER part with a Sub - it should be the last choice.
Really, really terrible and dumb advice from a normie....
@@desireless4092 I think we can agree to disagree with the name calling. They're just watches, dude. Relax.
Hi I know you are trying to compare these watches as tool watches but most collectors don't just buy them for the best function as a practical watch for the adventure they want them for. So as you have said it can't be just the function of the watch it's about the person who owns the watch and there desires for owning the watch. For me it's the explorer 2 the sea dweller and the James Cameron all different in there own way and if I had to pick one it's so hard (probably the sea dweller) interesting video thanks John 👍.
Cheers
The Explorer 2 fits your personality better out of three. For dressier occasions you can get a datejust or OP41 instead of Explorer 40
And Submariner is just the best all-around watch to keep it forever:)
Cheers
Keep the explorer for more formal, and one of the other two. I guess the sub is more versatile because of the bezel for timing. Do you really need gmt?
I don't need it, but its so helpful with all the traveling I do. To know, doesn't matter what time zone I'm in, that I need to have all business matters completed by the time that orange GMT hands hits that arrow between 16 and 18 is a big help. Cheers
Yeah, sounds about right. One of the reasons I love to wear my 124060 in cold days with the caveat that "I won the bad type" and mine loses no more than a second a day, no matter the position, which I get annoyed by but it is still within specs.
Anyway, really though watch and my grail in my collection.
Its an amazing watch!
@@cheynewalls Well I found a way to "regulate" him with different positions, so it can be extremely accurate, but I don't have to convince you :D
What you seek with the Explorer 2 and the bezel is named GMT Master II. Check the M126710GRNR-0003 variation (same one you showed but with the jubilee)
Triple lock is exclusive to the diving line of Rolex, for me the answer is easy as I also want the GMT II Master and DJ41. They suit my taste. Modest, stoic, well made with low to no garish.
Rather sell the Omega and Breitling you have. I also have a Breitling - the Navitimer AB0120 and while he is a looker, I torment him the least out of all mine, since with his 30M WR I don't wanna push it and I keep hem away from "extreme" situations especially when labor work might be required around the house or something like that. If I was in need to let go of something for some cash - he would be the one to sell, as much as I love him - he cannot compare to my Sub.
I have both a submariner date and the 40mm Explorer. Of the two I think I prefer wearing the Explorer. If I could have a submariner with its 300m depth rating with the explorer dial it would be the perfect watch for me.
Yeah, all down to personal preference and what you need out of a watch. Cheers
Try sub no date
You can. It's a Steinhart 39mm Adventure Classic. Or their Ocean 39 Premium.
Nice vedio bro and interesting topic, yes we as watch lovers, keep buying lot of watch, at the end we asking our self same question,
Do we need all thus watches?
I been watching your vedio long time, your lifestyle is much casual and advanture,
My advice, keep explorer 2 and get either oyster perpetual or datejust for formal ware.
Cheers, thanks for your input.
If it’s Rolex only, I’d say sell the sub and exp 40. Consider either GMT master or yachtmaster. GMT has rotating bezel but it won’t patina. Yachtmaster has 42 mm which seems closer to your size preferences and has titanium option but the bezel is ceramic. The 40 mm YM has a platinum bezel that can patina. Also the YM bezel is bi-directional which is a little more convenient for timing
Thanks for the info, yeah really looking into a GMT Master. I like the Yachtmaster, but that GMT function is a big help to me. Cheers
Yeah definitely, the GMT would complement your Exp II nicely in a 2 watch setup. A GMT with a jubilee bracelet would lean more dressy but still fulfill the role of the Exp II in a pinch or vice versa.
@@grein545 Oh good point, thanks
I would place a bet that you got a GMT-Master II. Congratulations if you did. The GMT-Master II is my favorite Rolex on paper. On the wrist it is way too shiny and jewelry-like for me but is a great watch. I feel that the Explorer II is the more low-key tool watch version of the GMT-Master with only one less function due to the fixed bezel.
You'll have to stay tone and see. I agree its a bit to shiny for me, but a few days rock climbing, getting a bit gnarled up will get ride of that shine and I think give it a great look. Cheers
I have the Explorer 40 and Submariner. I love all of them though. DO NOT SELL ANY OF THESE! Keep them all unless you need the money. You'll regret it later and it'll be harder to get back. Plus it won't be the same watch. Just keep them. I understand when you get several watches (I have 9 now) you start questioning yourself and if you need them all. I set 9 as my limit and if I want another one of these has to go. Maybe set a limit like that for yourself and stick to it. Great content and keep them coming. Again, unless you need the money don't sell any of these!
Very good advice, thank you that. I'm at that point of questioning myself if I need them all. That is a great idea to set a limit. I'll keep you posted. Cheers
Huge Sub fan here, but Explorer II is THE ultimate mountaineering watch in my book. It’s no coincidence that it was a primary choice by the SAS.
Note: I am curious know how the Breitling failed you btw. Been owing a titanium Chrono Avenger E13360 16 years+ and it’s by a country mile the most robust watch I have experienced (y more robust than Explorer ).
I have taken it through absolute hell and back (got the marks to prove it) yet hasn’t missed a beat.
Yeah, the Rolex Explorer II does it all and a great fit when I'm out mountaineering.
I've heard that from a lot of Breitling owners, I love the look of their watches and should give Breitling another look. I might of had some bad luck with the watch and AD experience.
After only about 6 month of having my Aviator 8 B01 Chronograph Mosquito (still think its one of the best looking watch of all time) I took it hiking out in the Utah slot canyons. I was running the Chronograph to time my hike and noticed when I reset the watch back at camp, the seconds hand wouldn't reset correctly. I didn't remember hit it on anything and didn't notice any damage to the watch. Took it to the AD to get fixed and they told me I shouldn't have been running the Chronograph while hiking, therefore they wouldn't fix it under warranty.
So I was a bit upset at Breitling. This could have all been bad luck, I hear nothing but good things about the brand, might have to give them a second chance. Cheers
The only Rolex I can think that combines the rotating bezel, GMT function and white dial is the GMT Master 2 meteorite, but it’s solid white gold, maybe the shine would scare the bears off. Btw, I want to know your opinion of the Jeep Gladiator since you’ve reviewed your Toyota Tacoma, do you recommend it as reliable and outdoorsman type?
lol, Can you imagine a white gold meteorite dial Rolex GMT out in the wilderness, that would be a sight. I like the Jeep Gladiator, a lot of my friends have them. Very good & capable truck up until about 100k, after 100,000 miles they start having major issues. Cheers
I have all the three watches. I also have another one; my fourth is Date Just 41 Wimbledon. I would say it’s a different feeling coming from field watches to a professional type watch.
These days I only wear the date just. On occasion wear the explorer.
Haven’t worn the sub and explorer 2 in a long time!
I love all three of these watches and I understand what you are saying, sometimes my Explorer II loses out on wear time when I'm not travel and I feel kind of bad about it.
Explorer 2 for sure 👍
Cheers
Another interesting and entertaining video! I really think you should consider the Tudor FXD over the Submariner in my opinion.
Thanks, I like the Tudor FXD, I don't however like that the bezel is a count down bezel, going 50 40 30. Easier for me to have the conventional format. Cheers
@@cheynewalls I get that. Although I think that the count down bezel on the Marine national is great for everyday use like cooking timing to a target. If you prefer a conventional bezel the Black Tudor FXD has a normal elapsed time bezel.
@@frederikgaden3624 oh a 100%. It makes sense, I just can’t wrap my head around it after using a traditional diving bezel for most of my life.
Cheyne, I disagree with others. These watches have different movements, different case designs, and as you said preference is everything..I told you the explorer 2 after the freezer test.. but as a datejust 41 owner (which has measured smaller) maybe the explorer 40.
Thanks for your thoughts and input. Cheers
The sub is a DIVER’s watch.
For outdoors hiking/climbing:
X sub has ceramic bezel
X Explorer has no date
☑️ Explorer II - most legible, best lume, date and GMT for hiking in Europe, indestructible bezel.
Well that is what I like a lot about the Rolex Submariner, it can be both. I can wear it when I go scuba driving (and have means times) also I can wear it hiking or out in the wilderness.
A tool watch for me is time only and a means to track a period of time (mins / hours) The Submariner is my pic. However, since I'm not a fan of the shiny maxi case, the Black Bay 54 gives me the smaller charm that suits everything I need. Its built like a tank but if it dies, I'm not down £8k. Great video
I like the Tudor Black Bay 54, great watch. Yeah, like I mentioned in the video, everyone needs of like different aspects of tool watches. I personal really like that date function with with all the traveling I do.
@@cheynewalls There's a beautiful watch out there for everyone 🙌
@@rabtrekker indeed
Good video again, Cheyne! Well, it's a hard decision. If you don't need something dressy, I go with you and with the Explorer II (but only the polar). Answering your other question - you never can have enough ROLEX watches in your collection. Even if they have very often the same or very similar calibers, they all are so different in so many ways. Have a nice day, PROST!
Thank you, Good words of wisdom, PROST!
I think the one in done would be a GMT master two with a 60 click bezel rather than the current 24 click
@@APDLuu that is what I’m currently thinking. Cheers
@@cheynewalls I wanted to sub my whole adult life and finally got one. There was a time where I was considering a GMT until I realized they only have a 24click bezel on the ceramics. That was a change that makes sense for the GMT but totally ruined it for me.
@@APDLuu yeah, not sure why it’s not the same as the Submariner
@@cheynewalls More differentiation makes sense for Rolex but like I said, the 24 click essentially makes it a useless bezel for timing with a 2.5 minute resolution. 60 or 120 click with bi directional rotation would be ideal for a one and done. Keep the videos coming, you do a great job
GMT Master II combines the best of all three watches . Date function 40 mm and rotating bezel and classy enough to dress up
It doesn’t give you a proper waterproof case.
@@riveravictor 100 m is not enough for you?
I agree
Its got the old Submariner case and its got a triple lock system.
I always thought that the Explorer 40 should have the crown guard instead of the Air King. The Explorer is basically an OP with a different dial and hands; they should make it a little more unique. I'm also not sure why the price difference is $1,300, even when the OP is 1mm larger.
Yeah, I have been told that even tho they use the same movement, the Explorer movement is beefed up a bit with different more robust lubricants.
@@cheynewalls That's interesting. I have never heard that.
@@dalesmith7250 I was surprised as well. It was told to me by a Rolex AD staff member from an AD I visited in Denver when I was passing through.
Explorer ii is my favourite ❤️
Cheers
I said this when you got the Explorer 40 but I really don't think you need three of basically the same Rolex. I would have explored other brands at this point. To your point about assembly, all Rolexe's are mostly machine made. The only assembly step that requires human hands is dropping the movement into the case. Everything else is automated
Good to know about the assembly process. To your point about trying other brands, I have, many. Rolex was the last of about 20 different brands over 25 years. I'm just so impressed with Rolex timepieces I don't see myself looking at other brands until I move into more high horology. Cheers
As a photographer myself … tho a hobby… just put a stop watch (count up & down type) on your tripod & keep the Explorer 2… which I have also. Problem solved. 🙂
Its easier for me to just wear a wrist watch, a stop watch would just be another thing to add to my bag and like Quartz watches batteries always going flat on me when I'm out camping in subzero temp. Don't have that issue with mechanical watches, my tool watches are a better easier fit for me. Also if you didn't notice, it takes two hands to work my technical camera, again easiest to look at my wrist.
Smaller is better generally. More comfortable, more elegant, still legible, not trying to show off, etc. however i will say that once in a blue moon its fun to wear a bigger watch.
Yeah, ever since I got that Rolex Explorer 40 I'm very much warming to smaller watches.
I think the submariner might be a great choice as it is the most iconic and also the timer can be helpful for many different things.
My question is in regards to the GMTs, what’s the point of the rotating bezel and how will it be helpful?
It would aid me in timing in things, like long exposures, hiking time and so on, I talked about with the Submariner in this video.
I have really important question😅 You can test it in fields btw. Is there any differences in accuracy etc. between Rolex "tool" models and simple every day watches like OP or DJ? Keep going, mate!
I wouldn't thinks so, they share the same movement as the Explorer. Cheers
Preceramic Rolexes are by far the best ones IMO. Ceramic 👎. Full steel Daytona is the best watch among Rolexes... For Longines, the best one is full titanium Spirit 40mm... For Tudor, the best one is Pelagos FXD....
I use to think the same thing, but I'm so impressed with my Ceramic Submariner. I have slammed that bezel against rocks, drop that watch onto a wooden floor and not even a chip. That metal ring around the ceramic and the Rolex ceramic itself is so durable.
The spirit of Rolex is that of a tool watch. While the Submariner is THE iconic watch,…it is ubiquitous/played out and associated with desk divers. IMHO the Explorer II represents what Rolex was and what should be. Explorer II with the steel bezel is unmatched.
Well said, Cheers
if your not in need of financial aiding to add the gmt2, then maybe don't sell any until you tried all four. once you sell them, it's gone. you might want to buy it again, and it will be a bumber rebuying them. allin all, seems like your enjoying your watch life!
That is a possibility and maybe a good idea, because your right "once you sell them, it's gone." Cheers
Cheers 🍻
Cheers
I'm going today to pick up my Bryce Wayne on oyster today.... I'm expecting this to be my LAST watch
Congrats, If you don't mind me asking, how long did you need to wait? I'm currently on the waiting list. Cheers
@@cheynewalls I put my name down on the day it was released .... it is absolutely amazing.... I've no problems letting both my Polar Explorer 2 and Good Planet GMT go in order to fund it.... I believe the Master 2 is the ultimate 1 watch Rolex collection
1.) Rolex are luxury tool watches. The brand, the price point, and the purpose/use-cases. Paying over $7K USD for an Explorer 36/40, over $9.5K for an Explorer 2, and damn near $10K USD for a Submariner, while having to wait for a call from months to years due to high demand and alleged low-supply, is all luxury.
2.) The Polar Explorer 2 is the the ultimate tool watch, but the Explorer 1 is by far the best GADA in terms wearing it on a hike, to the beach, and in more formal attire. The Explorer 1 really does it all (sans the date). With that being said, if you absolutely need the date, want a classier piece that is still toolish, and still need the GMT, then going for that Bruce Wayne GMT is definitely a good move.
3.) We both know the point of the Explorer 2 steel non-rotational bezel was to ensure that spelunkers wouldn't knock their bezel in a cave and mess up what time they were tracking without any sunlight, or break the bezel if it wasn't steel. So a rotating bezel on a Explorer 2 doesn't fit the use case. If you are fine with knocking a rotating ceramic bezel around then that can still work with the Bruce Wayne GMT.
4.) The community really wants Rolex to bring the Explorer 2 back to down to a 40mm size again due to it being such a beefcake.
Thanks you for your thoughts and input.
Bro the 36mm Explorer 1 is so friggin comfortable it’s insane. You forget you are wearing it!
I bet, I almost forget about it when I'm wearing my Rolex Explorer 40.
But it's way too small for a proper men's sport watch. The 40mm is already so tiny.
@@maitrehg yeah def need an invicta 58mm to feel like a real man
@@BLR653 A 36mm Explorer for women and a 58mm Invicta are two really ridiculous extremes. I much prefer my Omega Planet Ocean 43.5mm. Omega watches for Alpha males.
@@BLR653😂
The older aluminum bezel gmt master 2 is the ultimate tool watch
Great tool watches, but I'm a big fan of the newer movements with the Paramagnetic hairspring & Paraflex shock absorption. I have a buddy who wears an aluminum bezel GMT Master 2 and his, with all the airport travel he does, gets magnetized every time after a week or two of constantly going in and out of airport security. I don't want to have to worry about that. Cheers
The Tudor BB GMT Pepsi has an aluminum bezel and is a very attractive and well built watch.
I have a submariner, omega seamaster and a Tudor. I only wear my sub and I ask myself the same question almost every week. My only justification is handing them down to my kids or trading them in for another watch.
@@xempyrealxryan92 Yeah, that is in the back of my mind, would love to hand these watches down.
Put an Artem Strap fkm rubber Hydroflex on anyone of them watches and the comfort goes to an 10/10 instantly!
Do they now have Hydroflex in 21mm?
Yep, 19,20,21 & 22mm! The Hydroflex is killer!
The Sub no date is the way to go.
With all the traveling I'm doing, its just so helpful to the know the date with a quick glance to the wrist.
Easy! Explorer 2
Cheers
One thing I wonder is: do I want my chef to use his 12k tool watch to cook my steak or just use an 8 dollar thermometer.
Well, I think you're a bit over simplifying, Yes that 8 dollar thermometer might work for a year or so then you need to replace it every year. Or what if the 8 dollar thermometer breaks a 100 miles from the nearest place where you can get a replacement it? Not to mention if I'm meeting with potential clients and they see me using the cheapest, lowest quality equipment "8 dollar thermometer" they might question the final products quality.
Your next watch should be the GMT Master 2. It has the GMT with the rotating bezel 😂
What did I miss, why is that funny?
@@cheynewalls I have seen many go through all the different Rolex models and end up with one watch collection. All you need is just one Rolex. Explorer 2 is a great one watch collection.
@@dstjoe I would would agree with that.
I got 2022 Exp ii. But only watch that will be on the field with me is G Shock 😂
Why not take the Rolex Explorer II out into the field? That is what is was built for.
Tool watches and elegance should never be used in the same sentence 😂
Why not? It what makes Rolex tool watches so special.
126710grnr?
Indeed, thats what I'm looking at.
The best tool watch is a G-Shock
@@danield6815 can’t trust G-shock watch. The batteries keep going flat then I go snow camping with them. No issues with well built mechanical watches
@@cheynewalls You know, in the army 90% of the combat soldier are using G-Shock. If it good for soldier, it goid for camping. Not to mansion that mecanical watch is very fragile for intensiv sports use . Today almost all G-Shock are solar powered.
So in the end all that you said is non valid.
NASA trust G-Shock
@@danield6815 I’m just speaking from personal experience. Don’t get me wrong, I like G-shocks, but they’re not good in with long term exposure to subzero temperatures. I’ve broken 3 G-shocks over the last 4 years. Haven’t had an issue with my Rolex mechanical watch. Yes the Army use them, one they’re not using in subzero environments, two they’re inexpensive to replace. Militaries all over the world used mechanical watches until a less expensive option came available.
@@danield6815 they have advantages and disadvantages. Mechanical watches are just a better fit for what I need them for. Cheers
Absolutely love your content, picked up an Explorer 40 myself a few weeks back and it's been a great daily watch. We talk nightly about watches on the ArchieLuxuryLivestream channel. You should pop by as many of us have similar tastes in watches as you, would be cool for others to learn about your show!
Will do, thank you. I'll check out the channel. Cheers
People buying watches over £50 need help.
Help me 😂
So you think it smarter for me to buy a $50 watch and once it breaks after a few weeks go and buy another one? Therefor I'm buying, breaking, throwing away and then re-buying a different watch every few weeks? What is wrong with just buying a well built quality timepiece that will last generations?
get the GMT
I'm really thinking about, Cheers
Had the explorer 2 and wanted the sub, ended up getting a Batman and never looked back. I came to the same conclusion you are.
BUT I also want an explorer 1
Cheers, thanks for that insight.
The best Rolex for the field… is a Casio.
You haven't seen my other have you. I have the problem with Quartz watches batteries always going flat on me when I'm out camping in subzero temp. Don't have that issue with mechanical watches.