Palki Sharma's Speech | Why Modi's India is on the Right Path | Oxford Debate

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 кві 2024
  • Watch Palki Sharma, a prominent Indian journalist, deliver a compelling speech at the Oxford Union, arguing why Prime Minister Narendra Modi's India is on the right path. With references to John Kirby's statement from the White House and backed by statistics, Sharma explores three major developments: financial inclusion, internet and mobile penetration, and increasing airport traffic.
    Contrasting the narrative of a "self-doubting India," Sharma paints a picture of a confident nation inspiring and leading the world. She describes India as a "soft-power giant" and a democracy that no longer tolerates terrorism or betrayal.
    Sharma's arguments are supported by data, showcasing India's doubled per capita income since 2014, plummeting inflation, and record-high foreign direct investment and trade. She attributes this progress to political stability and a focus on connectivity under Modi's leadership.
    Dispelling Western narratives, Sharma asserts that India is a consensus builder, not a troublemaker, and highlights its balanced approach in global affairs, including the Russia-Ukraine conflict and assistance to Sri Lanka.
    In conclusion, Sharma asserts that India's path is about charting its own destiny, not conforming to Western standards. She challenges portrayals of India as a poor democracy, emphasizing the respect for the Supreme Court and the people's mandate by the Union government.
    #PalkiSharma #NarendraModi #India #OxfordUnion #Speech #Debate #GlobalAffairs #PoliticalLeadership #Democracy #FinancialInclusion #SoftPower #EconomicGrowth #ForeignPolicy #Balance #ConsensusBuilder #ModisIndia #Connectivity #Progress #Leadership #WorldStage

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @parkashbaweja4121
    @parkashbaweja4121 Місяць тому +7

    Palki ji
    I am your great admirer
    Your have command
    over language you are bold
    You are courageous you are elegant you are sonatan you are modern you are the very best ambassador of Indian culture

  • @aryaputra1673
    @aryaputra1673 Місяць тому +7

    Zabardasht speech,,👍👍👍

  • @chandinipriya3
    @chandinipriya3 29 днів тому +1

    Palki ji❤
    And I wish more men and women journalists from our country to represent internationally.
    Our India has to develop soft power

  • @suneelagrawalbhopal4223
    @suneelagrawalbhopal4223 Місяць тому +2

    We all indian love you Palaki sharma.
    We have proud on you
    Regards

  • @pankajmishra4841
    @pankajmishra4841 24 дні тому

    A good presentation by palki sharma Madam

  • @nvnbabu
    @nvnbabu Місяць тому +4

    Mam, whatever you are saying if this had happened 30 years back where would I stand as an Indian today. I am happy today, at least today one person made my dream 'BHARATH' come true.

  • @kallianpurachar8008
    @kallianpurachar8008 Місяць тому +3

    Excellent presentation 👏

  • @sanjayb4159
    @sanjayb4159 Місяць тому +6

    & she calls.herself.a.journalist 😂😂😂😂😂😂
    Godi dalals.cannot be called.journalists.

  • @maqsoodqureshi6968
    @maqsoodqureshi6968 25 днів тому

    Palki Ji: You're definitely going places. We're so proud of you! :-)

  • @subhashmishra953
    @subhashmishra953 Місяць тому +1

    Amazing representation..great the way gone.

  • @HumanFirstPatriotNext
    @HumanFirstPatriotNext 29 днів тому +2

    In the digital coliseum of UA-cam, a recent Oxford Union debate has become a rallying cry for a brand of manufactured outrage gripping Indian journalism. While clarifications regarding the debate's timing and format have been offered (it occurred a year ago, speakers were assigned positions beforehand), a one-sided narrative, fueled by podcasts like "Beer Biceps," (not that Ranveer is to blame) has taken root in the public consciousness. This tendency towards a "wholistic consumption of knowledge," as it's deceptively termed, betrays a worrying decline in intellectual curiosity within the Indian public sphere. This analysis dissects this manufactured patriotism and the shallow reception of the debate.
    Firstly, the very title of the debate - a loaded question if ever there was one - demands an opinion on the ruler, deified to a near-godlike status, rather than the concept of the state itself. Labelling those who oppose the motion on a global platform as traitors undermines the very essence of debate. A coin requires two sides, and to demonize those assigned the opposing view by chance is intellectually bankrupt.
    The Oxford Union has a history of hosting debates on taboo subjects - religion, God's existence - that would be unthinkable in a nation supposedly on the "pioneering" path. Here's the stark reality: prime-time news in India routinely silences dissent on live television, a blatant assault on the fourth pillar of democracy. Given this stifling environment, it's unsurprising that a platform offering a semblance of openness attracts dissenting voices. To equate dissent with maligning the nation is a convenient deflection from the crux of the matter - the nation is an entity larger than any individual, and the debate's subject is precisely that individual. This strategy of "putting the West in its place" is as shallow as it is transparent. As long as such tactics garner applause, blind patriotism can be conveniently claimed, while dissenters are branded "anti-national."
    There's no moral courage in blind loyalty. Self-proclaimed flag-wavers conveniently overlook the plight of university students languishing in jails under draconian laws designed to stifle dissent. While rulers sow the seeds of hatred and division, these "nationalists" become self-appointed brand ambassadors, peddling a distorted definition of patriotism. Comparing farmer and student protests to international riots reveals a shocking disregard for the democratic process. The average Indian citizen, grappling with daily struggles, is unlikely to be well-versed in worldly affairs. Yet, the mainstream media has successfully constructed a narrative that portrays our own farmers and students as "anti-national." Were this energy directed towards safeguarding our borders, perhaps territorial losses wouldn't be a concern. These journalists, exhibiting breathtaking hypocrisy, have the audacity to accuse others of "double standards."
    The rise of technology has ushered in a sinister form of intellectual debasement. Critical thinking and reasoned analysis have been replaced by pre-formed opinions, fueled by ever-shrinking attention spans. In this "part of the world," as such journalists fail to mention, civilization seems to have regressed due to linguistic and religious
    differences. Preconceived notions of who is a "patriot" or an "anti-national" dominate discourse, leaving no room for reasoned debate based on facts.
    Blind praise for nationalism is as hollow as demonizing dissent. Such reductionism is intellectually bankrupt and a betrayal of education. Singling out the Oxford Union for its "White-West" demographic mirrors the current government's approach: dwelling on the past to deflect from present failings. A healthy democracy thrives on questioning, dissent, and a healthy scepticism towards authority. Had these journalists provided a platform for dissent within India, perhaps the need for an international forum wouldn't have arisen. Wielding power from their armchairs, these "nationalists" indulge in racialized "anti-West" rhetoric, promote a warped sense of patriotism, and selectively ignore dissent. This does not grant them the moral authority to dictate the terms of nuance in such debates. Operating within their protected bubble, they remain oblivious to the simmering pressure cooker of dissent building up in the nation. Equating dissent on UA-cam with a vibrant democracy is another dangerous reductionism. The rulers' ambitions extend far beyond securing votes; they seek to control minds. These journalists, with their obfuscation of facts, are unwitting accomplices.

  • @inders4627
    @inders4627 Місяць тому +1

    Palki Sharma ji you are best. Bhagvan Ram bless you.

  • @Simplifiedupsc296
    @Simplifiedupsc296 25 днів тому

    There is no need for the debate on India's growth and prosperity in terms of every aspects, the west and the whole world knows India's progress , we are the vishwa guru .

  • @rameshjamdar1555
    @rameshjamdar1555 Місяць тому

    Your arguments, delivery and all else was excellent. However your formal Indizn dress, the Sree took the cake. You were excellent, an 8ndian to the core.

  • @vickyarora9972
    @vickyarora9972 Місяць тому

    Well said...🙏

  • @krishna_KaorakeZone
    @krishna_KaorakeZone Місяць тому

    Fantastic!

  • @priyanshurajputana5036
    @priyanshurajputana5036 Місяць тому

    👏👏👏

  • @kamalakantapattnaik1682
    @kamalakantapattnaik1682 Місяць тому

    Thousand percent correct

  • @sandhyajoshi2402
    @sandhyajoshi2402 Місяць тому

    Palki Sharma you are the best❤

  • @pravinpathak6810
    @pravinpathak6810 Місяць тому

    We are proud of you

  • @rameshpasupuleti1817
    @rameshpasupuleti1817 29 днів тому +1

    Madam muslims also our Indians love them and take the interviews of Muslim women?

  • @priyaramdoo4762
    @priyaramdoo4762 Місяць тому

    Palki Please work in harmony with UK to unite the whole world in Peace

  • @KrisnaRukmini-tr3gd
    @KrisnaRukmini-tr3gd Місяць тому

    0:24

  • @azeemosman2103
    @azeemosman2103 Місяць тому +3

    There is no comparison between Mr Prashanth Bhushan Ji n Palki Sharm Ji
    Palki Ji s is scripted document read like a school student Prashanth Ji cover many concepts deserves to hear

  • @mantamang7969
    @mantamang7969 Місяць тому +3

    India is 100 years back in present world

    • @kandarifitness1205
      @kandarifitness1205 Місяць тому

      Then you don't know india 😂😂...

    • @Xyzvbn
      @Xyzvbn Місяць тому

      Any logic behind this statement or just making fool of ur self and making ppl regret who provided u internet

    • @rithvka4227
      @rithvka4227 Місяць тому

      Maybe USA not India. Durga riots USA and UK are 100 years back in present world

  • @RavinderArora-eh8rt
    @RavinderArora-eh8rt Місяць тому +3

    She is also part of Godi media

    • @rithvka4227
      @rithvka4227 Місяць тому +1

      No it's Sardesai and USA media which are Godi not Palki

    • @gauravjangir7119
      @gauravjangir7119 24 дні тому

      Anyone who talks about good things or rather positive things about India or the present government... Its godi media ...
      Sad state

  • @mantamang7969
    @mantamang7969 Місяць тому +1

    Audience look like they are feeling bored

    • @rithvka4227
      @rithvka4227 Місяць тому +1

      No in fact they were bored with Prasanth Bushan speech

  • @rameshpasupuleti1817
    @rameshpasupuleti1817 29 днів тому +1

    Madam you are kindly requested to take the interview with muslm women and solve their problems, ?

  • @dadslittleprincess8795
    @dadslittleprincess8795 26 днів тому

    Denied 🔥

  • @bittu3341
    @bittu3341 26 днів тому

    Bjp❤modi ji ❤

  • @mantamang7969
    @mantamang7969 Місяць тому

    This is the great exclusive news for India … lol ha ha ha ha ha

  • @supra56
    @supra56 Місяць тому

    Everything is right, but what is Modi's India???

  • @RajuKamdar-ky9nd
    @RajuKamdar-ky9nd Місяць тому

    Bhai yh speech ko Hindi me likho na ple .

  • @SumoTheUltimateTraveller
    @SumoTheUltimateTraveller Місяць тому +6

    Biggest andhbhakt with good english speaking skills.

  • @KobayashiMaru-
    @KobayashiMaru- Місяць тому

    Yatha raja yatha praja ! Kuch bi speech , based on perception for propaganda not supported facts, similar to the lies spewed by Modi

  • @sandhyajoshi2402
    @sandhyajoshi2402 Місяць тому

    No we are not proud of Bollywood

  • @curiouslycuriousdoc6120
    @curiouslycuriousdoc6120 Місяць тому +4

    Newsreader cannot debate, can only vomit the script learnt byheart thanks to Godi Media, Hope you saw Deshbakt Banerji who counter argued the sari show in Oxford union 😂

    • @RahulYMishra
      @RahulYMishra Місяць тому +2

      Yeah we saw him (Banerjee).... Wondering why oxford even asked him to come who is not even aware of the basics of debate ... He is like why apple is not tasting like Orange....😂 Please make him understand that there is one terminology apple to apple comparison.....
      😂
      Just cribbing

  • @VanlalnghakaVuite
    @VanlalnghakaVuite Місяць тому

    Godi Media (Govt sponsored media wouldn't say anything bad about the regime. Eg : North Korean Media)

  • @VanlalnghakaVuite
    @VanlalnghakaVuite Місяць тому

    Jammu and Kashmir is divided
    2023 March , 300+ churches burnt down in Manipur, India.
    Modi : Mother of Democracy
    (us congress speech)
    CJI : Murder of Democracy
    (Chandigarh Mayoral
    election)
    GDP, QR code , vaccines , aiding Sri Lanka etc ..... Yes , she is right about it , Modi govt had done certain good things we all know.
    But, the people of this country are being threatened by the present Regime as Communal hatred had been spread throughout the Nation accompanied by lots of horrible violence, as a result many lost their lives.
    Political opponents are being put to Jail/House Arrest on false allegations.
    Democracy had been down to a rock bottom level , Judiciary is failed.
    Young ladies were paraded naked and gangraped.
    FIRST AND FOREMOST we want peace and then Development comes next.
    (Readers can go to youtube , FB etc and find out the truth about our India)