No one have hypersonic missiles but US (x-15, Talon A, Pershing-2, PrSM, HTV-2, x-43, Dark eagle...) china and srussia haven't their own semiconductor manufacturing, only USA and their allies have these, without chips, it's impossible to create hypersonic weapon
Looks like all DDG-51 Flt I&II should be upgraded with the Low Noise Amplifier ASAP. As CG's come out of service some antennas can be pre-staged to prime the pump at the plant in Moorestown, NJ.
Im guessing this is lockheed's response to Raytheon's bid to backfit SPY-6 radars... IMO SPY-6 backfitting is the better choice, its more expensive but its still far better than a slightly upgraded SPY-1
They have SPY-7 to respond to SPY-7. SPY-7 failed to be selected against SPY-6. SPY-1 LNA is a plausible solution for existing SPY-1 equipped Aegis ships. Future construction ships (Flight III) will go with SPY-6.
@@kongchoong This could be an option for ships that cannot have SPY-6 but as far as I know, all flight IIA's, which represent most Burkes, can have SPY-6 installed albeit a smaller version of what's on Flight III. Even a smaller SPY-6 should be better than an upgraded SPY-1, its still an AESA vs PESA
LNA is not enough to detect hypersonic threats. LM is hiding something here. LNA amplifies noise so you can filter it out and detect signal of interest (sicker or warhead)
need to tell everyone the truth about foreign countries hypersonic missiles that the media wont shut up about he united states has no hypersonic missiles because it is in no rush to develop them, the "hyper sonic missiles" the media wont shut up about are from China and Russia, Russia's hypersonic missles are not hyper sonic missiles but are manufactured through intentional framing and the spread of misinformation by the media. For the 2 people probably reading this to try and prove me wrong just hear me out. This conversation that is centered around Hypersonic missiles, and if you think that Russia and China are simply ahead of the US in this technology then you are dead WRONG. If instead you center it around hypersonic TECHNOLOGY then suddenly america has the resounding lead. Something is considered "hypersonic" once it passes mach 5, the space shuttle would regularly exceed mach 25 and while the space shuttle may be gone the air force's x-37 still continues to do that to this day. Even american private companies have hypersonic platforms like SpaceX, Blue Origin and Boeing, this technology is prevalent it just doesnt have a warhead. It is very misleading to suggest that the United States lacks the technology to put a warhead on a target at these velocities because they could. In 2004 NASA's X-43 scramjet demontrator hit mach 9.6 and in 2011 Boeing's X-51 scramjet hit mach 5.1 and in that same year DARPA's HTV2 glide vehicle hit mach 20. But in 2017 Russia claims they made the world's first "hypersonic weapon went into service with their KH-47 Kinzal the Kinzal is just the first stage of a short range ballistic missile mounted on the belly of a MIG-31. It's true the Kinzal started out as the Iskander short range ballistic missile designed in 1988 not exactly what you would call cutting-edge. The US could match this very easily and quickly, but it would not be very statically valuable. The real return Russia got out of it, is from the press coverage that went overboard as it is prone to do. And since the Kinzal is nuclear armed Russia never has to prove it works. They just strapped a missile from the 80s to a fighter jet from the 80s and got press attention that acted like they were a cutting edge weapons producer. Now about the hypersonic boost glide vehicles that the media also wont shut up about. Both China and Russias hypersonic glide missiles are nuclear armed the US is only focused on developing conventionally armed hypersonic weapons and that poses more challenges and takes longer to develop because if a hypersonic missile is nuclear armed it doesnt need to be accurate, but if conventionally armed it needs to be accurate. At the end of the day the US does not need to make another nuclear weapon, and the whole thing about hypersonic missiles being able to evade missile defense systems and be less detectable is complete nonsense. US satelites would immediately detect the heat given off from the launch. And no country can knock out waves of incoming nukes so it doesnt matter whether you launch a hypersonic missile or an ICBM the end of the world come the same. China has not proven that it can hit a moving aircraft carrier without nuclear armed missiles so their hypersonic anti-ship missiles are useless. The media is giving putin what he wants, they need to stop, without these false claims that western media loves to fascinate over, Russia wouldnt be selling any arms and would be lacking any military capability more than they already do, the western media is helping putin
@@itsma._ttt да, я видел тут на канале как в мультиках красиво сбивают сушки, миги и прочий диснейленд. Для американских налогоплательщиков стараются, надо же как-то очередные 40 млрд освоить :D
@@d.b.q.p.1540 А чего ты за американских налогоплательщиков переживаешь то? Крейсеры их страны не тонули в войне со странами у которых нет флота. Как же это глупо высрать такой коментарий обвиняя компанию Локхид в корупции, на фоне очевидных провавлов при ведении элементарных боевых действий.
In my opinion our muscle should be hidden in the dark and used for the enemy as a surprise, showing specifics is a stupid idea, It’s like a fight with your legs spread telling your opponent just kick Deez Nuts.
@@mayerdym5280 All good, there's no classified stuff in here...RX sensitivity stats or anything like that. They keep the important info to themselves, cheers.
пусть помечтают хотя бы в рендерах диснейленда, и кстати, в комментариях не всегда американцы пишут, иногда ряженых наших славных соседей буквально узнаешь за версту по говору и накалу говносрачиков :D
sure but that will be a long time, even the current S-400 Triumf Air Defense Systems can't intercept hypersonic missiles, and the S-400 can only detect and engage ballistic missiles when they are 60km away. So think twice on what you said.
I liked the way it intercepted the manoeuvring hypersonic missile. No harm being optimistic!
SPY-1 LNA is the clear choice for the Navy. Much more affordable, quicker turn-around and with a 30+ year PROVEN track record.
Probably the coolest company in the world
What amazed me is it ability to intercept hypersonic missiles 👌
No one have hypersonic missiles but US (x-15, Talon A, Pershing-2, PrSM, HTV-2, x-43, Dark eagle...) china and srussia haven't their own semiconductor manufacturing, only USA and their allies have these, without chips, it's impossible to create hypersonic weapon
Good job Lockheed.
better UAP tracking capabilities too integrated with the latest NRO sats eh lads?
That's what I was thinking. I tracked hundreds of UAP during Iraq invasion just after the Spy 1-B retrofit
Where do you think Lockheed got the technology. They been having a ufo many decades
Looks like all DDG-51 Flt I&II should be upgraded with the Low Noise Amplifier ASAP. As CG's come out of service some antennas can be pre-staged to prime the pump at the plant in Moorestown, NJ.
wow , can detect hypersonic threats , , , , , , , ,
orang indo ya wkwkk
cool
Maybe on the older cruisers/destroyers that have some life left and won't be retrofitted with SPY-6.
Hello from Ukraine
Hope it can defend us Swedes from Russians along with our allies
Im guessing this is lockheed's response to Raytheon's bid to backfit SPY-6 radars...
IMO SPY-6 backfitting is the better choice, its more expensive but its still far better than a slightly upgraded SPY-1
totally agree with you, SPY-6 is the better choice.
They have SPY-7 to respond to SPY-7. SPY-7 failed to be selected against SPY-6. SPY-1 LNA is a plausible solution for existing SPY-1 equipped Aegis ships. Future construction ships (Flight III) will go with SPY-6.
@@kongchoong This could be an option for ships that cannot have SPY-6 but as far as I know, all flight IIA's, which represent most Burkes, can have SPY-6 installed albeit a smaller version of what's on Flight III. Even a smaller SPY-6 should be better than an upgraded SPY-1, its still an AESA vs PESA
Very amazing...
🇺🇸💪🏻🇲🇽🤝🏻
👍👍👍👍👍
Why SPY-1 when they have the new SPY-7?
I think the existing DDG/CG can't be just upgraded by put the new SPY-7, the ship's power supply is too low.
And the space by old ships would be to small.
Is that hard to make a goodlooking warship like 055？ why the messy mast cannot be eliminated ？
♥️
I'm a Chinese. Did the last missile intercept Qian Xuesen ballistic curve missile? When you unify the world, don't kill me, I want to join the NASA.
chaynnaaaa xiii jingg pigg sweating 😅😅😅
LNA is not enough to detect hypersonic threats. LM is hiding something here. LNA amplifies noise so you can filter it out and detect signal of interest (sicker or warhead)
You wouldn't know your emitter from your collector...please stop trying to seem relevant.
Finally we had a way to stop hypersonic weapon
need to tell everyone the truth about foreign countries hypersonic missiles that the media wont shut up about he united states has no hypersonic missiles because it is in no rush to develop them, the "hyper sonic missiles" the media wont shut up about are from China and Russia, Russia's hypersonic missles are not hyper sonic missiles but are manufactured through intentional framing and the spread of misinformation by the media. For the 2 people probably reading this to try and prove me wrong just hear me out. This conversation that is centered around Hypersonic missiles, and if you think that Russia and China are simply ahead of the US in this technology then you are dead WRONG. If instead you center it around hypersonic TECHNOLOGY then suddenly america has the resounding lead. Something is considered "hypersonic" once it passes mach 5, the space shuttle would regularly exceed mach 25 and while the space shuttle may be gone the air force's x-37 still continues to do that to this day. Even american private companies have hypersonic platforms like SpaceX, Blue Origin and Boeing, this technology is prevalent it just doesnt have a warhead. It is very misleading to suggest that the United States lacks the technology to put a warhead on a target at these velocities because they could. In 2004 NASA's X-43 scramjet demontrator hit mach 9.6 and in 2011 Boeing's X-51 scramjet hit mach 5.1 and in that same year DARPA's HTV2 glide vehicle hit mach 20. But in 2017 Russia claims they made the world's first "hypersonic weapon went into service with their KH-47 Kinzal the Kinzal is just the first stage of a short range ballistic missile mounted on the belly of a MIG-31. It's true the Kinzal started out as the Iskander short range ballistic missile designed in 1988 not exactly what you would call cutting-edge. The US could match this very easily and quickly, but it would not be very statically valuable. The real return Russia got out of it, is from the press coverage that went overboard as it is prone to do. And since the Kinzal is nuclear armed Russia never has to prove it works. They just strapped a missile from the 80s to a fighter jet from the 80s and got press attention that acted like they were a cutting edge weapons producer. Now about the hypersonic boost glide vehicles that the media also wont shut up about. Both China and Russias hypersonic glide missiles are nuclear armed the US is only focused on developing conventionally armed hypersonic weapons and that poses more challenges and takes longer to develop because if a hypersonic missile is nuclear armed it doesnt need to be accurate, but if conventionally armed it needs to be accurate. At the end of the day the US does not need to make another nuclear weapon, and the whole thing about hypersonic missiles being able to evade missile defense systems and be less detectable is complete nonsense. US satelites would immediately detect the heat given off from the launch. And no country can knock out waves of incoming nukes so it doesnt matter whether you launch a hypersonic missile or an ICBM the end of the world come the same. China has not proven that it can hit a moving aircraft carrier without nuclear armed missiles so their hypersonic anti-ship missiles are useless. The media is giving putin what he wants, they need to stop, without these false claims that western media loves to fascinate over, Russia wouldnt be selling any arms and would be lacking any military capability more than they already do, the western media is helping putin
@@richardsears4665 lol russia is fake ! i dont believe their missle haha
👍 👍
Реальный мир - это то, что повинуется истине и справедливости и борется с тьмой и коррупцией...
นายกิตติกวินทร์แสงสุก
Милый мультик, но на рендере моря, травы, деревьев и динамики боя сэкономили и это при таком распиле матрасного бюджета!
cry harder while we advance,
stop crying angry russian kid) after sanctions your country can't produce even paper and nails
@@itsma._ttt да, я видел тут на канале как в мультиках красиво сбивают сушки, миги и прочий диснейленд. Для американских налогоплательщиков стараются, надо же как-то очередные 40 млрд освоить :D
@@d.b.q.p.1540 typical Russian all bark no bite hows your tech working out for you
@@d.b.q.p.1540 А чего ты за американских налогоплательщиков переживаешь то? Крейсеры их страны не тонули в войне со странами у которых нет флота. Как же это глупо высрать такой коментарий обвиняя компанию Локхид в корупции, на фоне очевидных провавлов при ведении элементарных боевых действий.
In my opinion our muscle should be hidden in the dark and used for the enemy as a surprise, showing specifics is a stupid idea, It’s like a fight with your legs spread telling your opponent just kick Deez Nuts.
'In my opinion our muscle should be hidden in the dark and used for the enemy as a surprise' - yeah...you really think this stuff is the cutting edge?
@@hdmccart6735 Right I’m really hoping that we have a lot more than this even so we should still shut up and only act as a surprise,
surprise is fear.
@@mayerdym5280 All good, there's no classified stuff in here...RX sensitivity stats or anything like that. They keep the important info to themselves, cheers.
عمر محمد محمود درويش احمد محمود عبد الخالق..؟!.......
Hire me
Фуфло, особенно о уничтожении гиперракет🤣
пусть помечтают хотя бы в рендерах диснейленда, и кстати, в комментариях не всегда американцы пишут, иногда ряженых наших славных соседей буквально узнаешь за версту по говору и накалу говносрачиков :D
Чувак, на срашке нечего не умеют производить, даже гвозди😂 даже ваши мультики про гипер пупер ракет не ваши xD
Over hyped missiles
ONE DAY, I CAN BEAT YOU 🇮🇳
sure but that will be a long time, even the current S-400 Triumf Air Defense Systems can't intercept hypersonic missiles, and the S-400 can only detect and engage ballistic missiles when they are 60km away. So think twice on what you said.
You're on the SS Street shitter U ain't doing beating anything bro
You mean China?
one day you can shit in the street again
thanks brothers for motivation wait that time will come soon .....🇮🇳