Does God Exist? - Many Absolute Proofs! (Part 1)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 гру 2020
- Have you proven God exists? This series from David C Pack examines stunning evidence from science and the natural world that reveal the plain truth about the existence of God... or do they?
Does God Exist?-Many Absolute Proofs! (Part 1)
• Does God Exist?-Many A...
Support Paulogia at
/ paulogia
www.paypal.me/paulogia
www.amazon.ca/hz/wishlist/ls/...
teespring.com/stores/paulogia
Paulogia Audio-Only-Version Podcast
paulogia.buzzsprout.com
Follow Paulogia at
/ paulogia0
/ paulogia0
/ discord - Наука та технологія
There is a quote from Neil Degrasse Tyson that I couldn't stop thinking about:
"One of the great challenges in life is knowing enough to think you're right but not enough to know you're wrong"
@Sword of the Spirit um, sure I guess. If you define it that way.
That's the Dunning-Kruger effect; the dumber and the more ignorant someone is, the more someone tends to think oneself smarter and more knowledgeable than anyone else. Religious apologists either suffer from this affliction or play as if you are... or both.
And those are the rare honest ones.
@Sword of the Spirit Do you mean that alleged entity who created a being he knew would disobey him and so punished him and all his descendants for eternity... almost all of which he later exterminated along almost all living things, out of disapointement in his own creation's failure which he made possible... then sacrificed himself to himself to forgive himself for the skewed game he made himself and yet still blames his own creation for...
If so, you have a very strange definition of smart.
Especially for something we still have absolutely no evidence of after millenias; only old, badly translated and heavily edited conflicting stories in one book of one tribe that are no different from any other story made up the world over about supernatural beings we once imagined out of lightning, volcanoes or the sun.
@Sword of the Spirit So you're saying you are dumber than this imaginary character who did all those stupid things in a many times translated and edited book of the Bronze age?
@Sword of the Spirit Please, keep your pity for all of those your own god with a highercase G, if he would exist, brings into the world; innocent human beings with a child's disease, a congenital deformity, in utter poverty and misery, in needless violence and suffering, letting 9 million of them die each year before the age of 5... and that you think are born tainted, soiled and fouled by a laughable crime against pride and egotism comitted by an equally imaginary ancestor thousands of years ago.
How do I wish I was my own god; then I could at least save one, even just one of those lives your imaginary sorceror condemns and tortures even before birth.
“Many absolute proofs” - How many _absolute_ proofs do you need? I would have thought that one - being absolute and all - would be enough.
@Sage of Synergism the kalam argument is the unsupported assertion of a thinking creator, and assumes a non-eternal universe. there is a new hypothetical model that puts the universe in an endless cycle.
@@grrsss8335 You say that but I have recently sent in my paper to the Nobel committee that proves that because the universe exists it has to have had a creator that thinks in base 12 because that's what all the kids in the interdimensional alien god school use and the one that created this universe for a science fair then also necessarily used base 12, lest it be ridiculed by the other kid alien gods.
@@grrsss8335 Airtight!
@Sage of Synergism Kalam is incorrect in its premises.
Within quantum mechanics causality breaks down, as we observe things happening with no discernable cause. Quantum mechanics operates on a probablistic rather than causal model.
Which means that things do in fact begin without necessarily having a cause the whole time, it just happens on such a small scale that it is only relatively recently that we could observe it happening.
The logic to Kalam's assertion was always a bit dodgy, when you consider that when we look at the universe on a human scale, we'd never actually seen anything begin, so any claims on what conditions were required for first causes were founded on empty assertions.
@Sage of Synergism how did you rule out a self-sustaining bootstrap paradox? Why is it impossible for the universe to have been created by a human time traveler from the future, using incredibly advanced technology to create the singularity which expanded into the universe we see today?
The cesium argument is hilarious as it's the same as if he'd said "Water has been designed to freeze at exactly 0 degrees Celsius and boil at 100!"
Peculiar fact, when first defined, Mr Celsius decided that the number 100 would represent the temperature when water freezes and the number zero, when it boils... I still have trouble imagining why and how.
@Edelwise even more hilarious when we realize that the cesium approach is just as non-constant as the water state-change points (when considering time dilation and pressure / impurities). :-B
"You will never see an explosion create ... a single thing of exquisite design instead of chaos and destruction".
*weeping fireworks*
🎆
Not to mention the Big Bang wasn't an explosion...
Cai Guo-Qiang
See also: Shape charges.
Man has clearly never heard of using thermite mixes to purify metals. Thermite can be made with a number of different oxides and metal powders, and it basically shifts all the oxygen atoms from the oxide to the metal, turning the oxide into a pure metal. They used a thermite reaction to purify uranium for the Manhattan Project, in fact.
Or you know...tunnels.
-The case for god is air-tight!
-David, is this god a generic one?
-No, of course not, He is alive and...
-I am sorry, David. If this god is around, let him do his own PR.
Thanks.
@PLANT POWERED PUNK God, there is no nice way to say this: you seem to be dumber than the average human!
Wait a minute... You are not the god!
Fellow human: Please, realize this is the wrong thread for your rant.
Not on topic.
I hope any god were as interested in chatting as their human minions are.
Thank you for your misdirected enthusiasm, anyway.
@PLANT POWERED PUNK If it were truly proven, the people who made that discovery would have won a Nobel Prize. Are you telling me that you subscribe to a international conspiracy of scientists from a variety of countries under different religions, cultures, political systems, languages and foods .. somehow managed to come to an agreement and hide this amazing discovery and lose out on the immortal fame of being the discoverer who upended the most recent big bang model? Have you ever read the prisoner's dilemma? Have you ever wondered why cops separate potential criminals when interrogating them or even before?
BTW - we dropped the religious guess because it didn't even achieve the traits necessary to become a scientific hypothesis. In addition, we have detected deep gravitational waves that appear to favor the big bang expanding universe. (Oh, and we have red shifts so we can tell that our galaxies are moving. It's not hard to see.. if you look. This is how we can predict the comets that are coming and tell the average person that "x" came within 150 KM of Earth or something.)
@@jenniferhunter4074 Now, imagine me looking like a chuppy round headed Guy, with yellow teeth and Brown hair set up, as if I used 60min blowing that hair with a leaf blower.
And now I tell you the reason why it is not fully proven yet.
"It's Ancient Satan"
@@GlossRabban I wonder if that would be a good tactic to use on the intelligent design guys. Whenever they say "Goddidit", you just put up a gif of that Alien spin guy and say "Aliens"
@@jenniferhunter4074 I've often thought that 'God did it' is basically the same as 'Aliens did it'.
I think Aron raised this question: if David is so certain of his "proof", why does he disable comments on his videos?🤔
The comments on this particular video are turned on. I just went and left one.
@@pizzedahff3127
Suzi Wolf is talking about Aron Ra's videos and channel
@@Razgar_Voxel nah, Suzi is talking about David.
Look at the comments, only positive or neutral ones are allowed.
@@88marome Same with William Lane Craigs channel. Reasonable faith!? Haha what a joke.
"I'm going to prove my god!"
Proceeds to talk about things that sound complicated to him and things he doesn't like about science.
Not the sharpest tool in the shed, that one.
At first, he went with a "god of the gaps" methodology, but then he gave up on that and switched to a "I don't get science" method.
@@jeffc5974 Then he attacks evolution which has nothing to do with God😂🤦🏿♂️
God just proved His existence in your subconscious. Now let's see how sharp yopu are,
@@jeffc5974 How come God doesn't prove to atheists He exist ? That's a Dilly of a hunty of a tough studid question.
@@garystevenson5560 I don't know what would get me to believe in a god, but an all knowing god would know, an all loving one would want me to know, and an all powerful one would be able to make it happen. At least one of things is not true, since he hasn't.
8:39 "The odds of winning the lottery are inconceivably low, and yet we are not surprised to regularly hear that someone won the lottery."
This is a great analogy that I'm going to have to remember.
The first law of thermodynamics is Don't Talk About Thermodynamics.
The final law of thermodynamics is, if this is your first night in the universe, you have to fight.
Physics Club?
@@brucebaker810 That’s next door to Chess Club.
The three laws of Thermodynamics according to Creationist:
1. The Universe and energy was made in seven days 6,000 years ago.
2. All humans before the global flood came from Adam and Eve.
3. After the global flood, all humans came from Noah's family and plus all animals from Noah's ark!!
@@ctwentysevenj6531 the zeroth law
This is exactly the kind of video my Christian friends recommend to me to "bring me back". Thanks for the commentary on it!
@The Truth Hurts You! Not yet. When I try to discuss the movie(s) with them, they tell me they haven't watched them yet, or it was a long time ago, or whatever. Basically, the movie seems to reinforce what they believe, and it's good enough for them, so why not me? After all, only an idiot could deny the clear facts presented by the wise looking man in his library.
@@Roll_Vids They ask you to watch videos they haven't seen or can't remember?
@@malirk "They ask you to watch videos they haven't seen or can't remember?" Such stuff is not a surprise it is not about to know, but just to feel "good". Like new age believers want you to "feel the vibrations" whatever this means. So do many christians recommend books or clips of theologians they did not sit through themselves. Some of the self-declared christians did not even read the whole bible, simply because it is a really boring book. They just read occasionally genesis, sometimes the exodus or the gospels and the revelations...but then they parrot what some preacher said about corinthians or leviticus and that is it.
@@malirk I think they just panicked, didn't know how to handle it when I told them I wasn't convinced anymore, and then grabbed something out of the church library. In some cases, they have been videos like this that they may have seen in an adult Sunday school class at some point.
Easier to say god did it than to discover reality. Only one book and you don't have to read it all, just pretend you did. Keep on learning m8. :)
Someone forgot to tell him the Second Law of Thermodynamics only applies in a closed system... And he didn't notice during his half a Bachelor's of research.
I've heard it said that "It takes an order of magnitude more effort to debunk BS than it takes to generate it." It must take a lot of time to make a video like this, good on you Paul.
I disagree
Aron Ra's series on this guy is still one of my favorites to date.
Just wanted to write the same comment - I totally agree.
Aron utterly destroyed this cult leader.
It was as beautiful as it was devastating.
I love watching David C. Pack of lies getting eviscerated. I would watch more if I could.
I agree. It was thoroughly, on the point and brutal. Classic AronRa :-)
I would honestly like to watch the series that you lot are talking about... any chance you have the link or know the name of Ra’s video(s)?
Everytime someone says that "evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics" I lose hair. Honestly, it's the perfect indicator that they didn't really research outside of creationists books and web sites, and that they don't understand neither evolution nor thermodynamics
And they rarely know anything about the other laws of thermodynamics - or the "in a closed system" part of the 2nd. It's like they forget about the existence of the sun.
Macro evolution isn’t even possible sorry bud. If it was even possible there would still be people evolving, we still have apes and we can’t visualize this process ever take place with ANY species on earth not to mention to believe in evolution you believe that dust evolved in its own all the way up the chain
I bet you still believe we landed on A dark moon and that the earths a magic spinning ball shooting through space! 🤣🤣😂
@@kingdaddy3681 The Dunning Kruger poster child, what an honor to meet you
@@rodoxag9117 well put it to the test buf
More sweet reason from Paul! No yelling, no hyperbole, just calmly exposing lies and half-truths. Wonderful.
Davic C. Pack was the individual most responsible for sending me along the path to Atheism. Thank you, David.
He's doing God's work... Sort of. Lol.
Is that like how the Jedi themselves were arguably the single greatest contributor to Anakin's turn to the dark side?
Oh man, I grew up with this guy. Something always felt off about his arguments, but my church just kinda said "amen" to every argument, so I figured they must be right. My how times have changed
Santa for adults right? Some kids don’t grow up. They use their wishful thinking to come to their beliefs. Facts don’t care about you ur feelings
David believes his own arguments and no one can prove him wrong.
A few years I would eat up his arguments like candy but now I know better.
@@JamesRichardWiley But does he really ? I often think they have been confronted enough to know better and are just grifters. What say you ?
@@stultusvenator3233 That is true, many are FRAUDS like most of the "brighter" flat earthers. Southern hemisphere flat earthers would have to be frauds cos of the Southern Cross constellation that is seen by everyone, circling the south celestial pole. eg. Mitchell From Australia.
Aron Ra gave a long and detailed rebuttal of this guy with his video series: "Refuting the Irrefutable Proof of God."
I listen to it so much that when I heard Pack of lies voice I was confused as hell for a moment.
That series was just so brutal. Aron wasn't holding back
Yes I’d love to hear you cover more of this series
The more the merrier.
@@TheDizzleHawke I enjoyed watching Aron hand this guy his head. I'm not much for going softly softly on religious rubbish.
This was great. Concise and insightful as usual, but with even more quick hilarious one liners that played well to the rhythm of his presentation. 😆
Paul has always been good, but he's really caught his stride in recent times. This video is a particularly fine example of his ever-increasing mastery of the craft.
He reminds me a bit of Logicked at his best.. but even more drol. Only great things to come from Paul..
Better watch out his one liners are almost as good as yours
I couldn't do that... i couldn't stay that calm while commenting a scumbag like Pack. He's not even weaseling around, like your average apologist, he's lying straight into peoples faces. How can anybody still believe a word he says?
@@nitro8529 because they want to.
I love how the UA-cam atheist community sticks together
I am new to your channel and new to (accepting) evolutionary/natural thinking after being a Christian my whole life until just a few years ago. I love your calm and collected way of debunking things. Your videos as well as other sources are really helping me to unravel all the indoctrination and brainwashing I've been subjected to my whole life. I have always been a logical and critical thinker but it amazes me I went for so long believing in Christianity. I guess when you are taught it from an early age, it is hard to separate yourself from it, even if you are critical and logical about everything else in your life.
You aren't alone, Cosmic Gopher, you aren't alone...
I can highly recommend Genetically Modified Skeptic as well. He takes a very kind approach to things
"This will be the most important video you ever watch." Uh, wow, someone thinks very highly of himself.
He's literally a cult leader. Of course he has a god complex.
The most important video I ever watched is the Soup Nazi episode of Seinfeld. It still is.
Come on, he spent an ENTIRE TWO YEARS deeply studying two things simultaneously. He is practically two Einstein's! ;) /s*
* I played guitar (etc.) for nearly 40 years. I started programming computers in the mid 1980s. I have been driving for over 30 years. Here is my irrefutable absolute proof of whatever....
@@RobertTempleton64 TWO FRICKIN' YEARS, bro!
It will also AMAZE and EXCITE you. It will be literally all you ever wanted. Believe me when I say this, because telling people what they want to hear is how I make a living.
When my son was 3 years old, he had “absolute “ certainty in the existence of Santa Claus. The certainty of a person tells us nothing about the truth of objective reality.
It was the discovery of many, many "Santas" that was my first clue.
Wait, Santa isn't real? Then how did the presents get under the tree? Checkmate Grinch's.
@@harryasmith527 - They were put there by the Easter bunny to deceive you!
@@harryasmith527 Touche
But Santa does exist...And she loves samba.
No one can thoroughly roast people as politely as Paulogia!!
Not sure why but Paulogia is great to listen to when stuck on dark souls bosses. Very soothing.
Caesium was not discovered until 1860; so "God's great clock" was not available to mankind for the first 5,864 years (by Bishop Ussher's count) of human existence. Very helpful!
Took us even longer to produce the tech to create atomic clocks.
Oh it’s that guy known for his assbeating by Aronra and... not much else
How many times do we have to teach this lesson, old man?!
@@corwin32 He's not here for us, his only concern is to milk the gullible.
Uh i’ll have you know he’s written 7 books and over 73 pamphlets and flyers
@@lennysmith8851 He's still a charlatan.
@@lennysmith8851 Hugh Hefner has written more books and pamphlets than that, if we're going by volume I'll stick with him.
"Mousetraps can't be made any simpler!" me: *glancing at the glue mousetrap* Um.....
Bruh, you misunderstood the point.
@@willandersen3695 Bruh, you misunderstood the engineering of a mousetrap. Turns out not only is the mousetrap reducible, it's actually an evolved structure. We know the history of mousetraps and how they were improved upon.
udel.edu/~mcdonald/mousetrap.html
@@willandersen3695 Bruh you misunderstood the point.
@@proculusjulius7035 You can criticize an analogy AND understand it, you know.
@@kendrajade6688 clearly
I love how he breaks down the quotations. The average person watching wouldn't know of how the quotes were being used deceptively like that. He gives them context, it's a pleasure to see him deconstruct these quotes or explain why they said what they said.
His method of proof is to instill doubt in science's inability to provide proof. What a joke.
It's actually to pontificate, intimidate, and threaten his cult victims into agreeing with him while overwhelming them with bullshit they'll be too scared to think about or verify, but who's counting
@16:05 "Matter and energy can neither be created nor destroyed." So God is not a creator, just a home decorator? Got it.
@20:12 So God isn't that good at house keeping. I'll believe that.
The second law of thermodynamics describes conditions in closed systems; so it does not apply to the earth, the solar system, our galaxy or (perhaps) our universe.
I've been binging this channel while playing Skyrim, and just now realized the avatar blinks. Creepy
Cesium-133 vibrates exactly 9,192,631,770 per second because THATS HOW WE DEFINED 1 SECOND.
We found something in nature close to the unit, and redefined the unit to match. We've been switching all the definitions this way.
The kilogram, kelvin, ampere, and mole were redefined in 2019. The second (1967), meter (1983), and candela (1979) already had been.
I'm intrigued. What does a candela measure?
_Edit_ I looked it up, luminous intensity. Brightness has a measurement, I have learned something today!
And since time isn't absolute, i wonder how many times per "second" would that atom vibrate as it travels to the ISS and back... ^^
@@irrelevant_noob kind of like the gemini thought experiment proven in 1956/7. showing relativity of position
@@irrelevant_noob what do you mean "time isn't absolute"? time is just another directionality (dimension) in timespace. we can observe condensed space and time. moving fast or slow in third dimension is no big deal so why would difference in temporal velocity be regarded as a special case?
@@sakatababa it's not just speed. "atomic clocks at differing altitudes (and thus different gravitational potential) will eventually show different times." So it's not "just" another axis, (well it can be, but then we can't "get" to its absolute values) so whenever you consider "a time" it will always need to be relative to some observer, or event(s).
One thing that might help with the question of cesium being used for keeping track of seconds is that he has it backwards. Cesium doesn’t provide time keeping it is used to define what a second is as decided by some humans.
And more importantly, the concept of a second was around long before anybody knew what a cesium was. Just like civilized people used the metric system long before a meter was defined as an unwieldy fraction of the distance traveled at the speed of light.
If I punched David C. Pack in the face every time he was that painfully back-asswards to reality, I'd be down to my shoulder from wear and tear after about one minute. I kinda need both arms, but... tough call anyways.
I immediately thought of how YEC's claim that radiometric dating is inaccurate because we don't know how fast the materials break down, then say that the proof of God is that it never changes.
I’m so glad you played his video at x1.25 speed. He actually sounded like he was speaking a language he knows! Amazing.
"Try to build something from nothing." I do believe that is what he is doing.
I love that these are ALWAYS geared to the believer. “See, now if someone ever challenges you, you can tell them they are wrong cause of these proofs” or something...
My dad was a Methodist minister. His faith has changed scope and strength, over the years (he was never a biblical literalist as he actually reads Hebron, Greek and Latin and can see where translations are...flukie) and his definition of god has changed. Carl Sagan was his hero.
But it’s cause he questioned the world himself, read lots of things, wondered, explored, was curious. And that made his faith richer and more expansive. He would never have thought to tell his church people “here’s the absolute proof, now you don’t have to have wonder”.
One giant argument from ignorance. Mixes abiogenisis and evolution.
And ignores the fact that the laws of physics only apply to the current universe as we know it. They might have been vastly different during the singularity (or before, if that word can even apply).
Also, they showed they have absolutely no knowledge of the laws of thermodynamics.
Mousetrap:
1. Get a cat.
2. Get wooden base, attach to cat.
3. Get spring, attach to base.
4. Get hammer, attach to base.
5. Get trigger, attach to base.
6. Get bait, attach to trigger.
7. Remove cat.
The whole time you have a perfectly functional mechanism to get rid of mice.
The first half made me bring up the question that I continually ask creationists for decades and have still yet to ever have any of them answer:
Is there anything that happens on its own or is god required for everything?
For example, if I take a handful of change and toss it on the ground, do the coins land in their final positions all on their own or does god come down and consciously, deliberately, and purposefully position them?
Is there anything that happens all on its own?
And as for the mousetrap, it turns out that it is reducibly complex. In fact, the mousetrap is an *evolved* structure. We have the history of how mousetraps were created and we can see how they evolved over time.
udel.edu/~mcdonald/mousetrap.html
Not going to lie. I forgot he was trying to prove god's existence by the end of this.
Creaationists always confuse evolution with abiogenesis which are not the same thing.
They also conflate evolution and the Big Bang, despite neither theory having any direct relationship with the other.
Yes but but I would grant them that evolution requires abiogenesis, either as a form of initial creation or as another natural process. And that many suggestions how natural abiogenesis might work are based on similar principles as evolution. For example, a selection process that accumulates robust macromolecules until they can combine to more complex, functional modules, is always somehow involved.
@@lower_case_t Abiogenesis is the beginning of life. Evolution is the process by which life changes and diversifies. Evolution deals with already existing life. They are still two separate things.
@@lower_case_t scientific theories on the evolution of life are not concerned with how life started, only how life evolved. Just because you can describe a process as "evolving" does not mean a theory such as the theory of natural selection is concerned with it. The word "evolve" just means change over time. Anything that changes can be described as undergoing some sort of "evolution," from molecules, to the flags of a country, to money, the universe, ect. You cannot conflate these things with evolutionary theories like natural selection, as natural selection is only concerned with the evolution of life, all other things that evolve are un-related. No one has ever claimed that the method by which automobiles evolved to their current state is described by natural selection
@@8698gil Yes. I agree to that. Still, evolution requires some sort of abiogenesis, so I can at least see why they constantly bring it up. Their big argument is that life cannot come from non-life, while a naturalistic view cannot even draw a clear line between inanimate and living objects and sees evolution as a continuation of abiogenesis once self-replicating entities have been established. So they think by claiming that the first part of this abiogenesis-evolution bundle is impossible they can debunk evolution altogether.
Some 'explosions' create cesium, which according to him is an exquisite clock... does that count?
I failed an exam today (electrical engineering). I felt stupid the entire day. Now I feel fine. Please cover his next brain fart!
"Imagine your watch was that accurate." I have a smartwatch. It is. :D LOL
Or anyone with an atomic clock. He's describing the exact mechanism that makes atomic clocks so accurate
Aron covered more of that bit in his series, but Pack is such a moron he uses one "perfect" "clock", says how it isn't actually perfect, and then uses a SECOND "more" perfect but also not actually perfect "clock". Disproves his own case three times in one fell swoop. That's Kent Hovind levels of self-ownage.
I watched this entire David C Pack series when it came up as an ad on the UA-cam. (I didn't know Aron did a series on the guy.) Now, I'm reflecting on my life choices.
On the question of do explosions ever create new things? Well, ironically cesium is formed in a supernova. 🤔
TL;DR: science stuff is hard to understand, therefore god.
God is hard to understand, therefore science? ;)
@@Graeme_Lastname : I'd rather go with that indeed.
@@nicolasandre9886 Common sense is so rare. :)
@@Graeme_Lastname : you got to be careful with this assertion though, science and common sense often disagree.
I hate that whole, "life has to be exactly like this", it doesn't. If our planet was different, then most likely, life would be different. How hard is that to understand?
Another confident conman cherry picking "facts" to prove god, not even a good try.👎
Good grief! Some of his “facts” involves quoting Henry Morris. My 3-year-old can provide better facts than Morris.
The word "god" does not explain anything.
David does not understand science
but his favorite word "god" explains everything to his satisfaction.
Good job Dave
and kudos for blocking critical thinkers from making comments on your channel.
"I don't get science, therefore God!" Entire argument.
Off work today and this pops up to go with my coffee....yay!!!
Same
15:20 he literally made the watchmaker argument.
How ignorant is this guy
Well, it does prove without a shadow of a doubt that the universe is made by eh... So... watches are made by humans - we know that because humans make watches. What are universes made by again? I seem to have skipped that page. Kids make volcanoes for science fair. Maybe some interdimensional alien child created this universe for science fair. :D
@@stylis666 Hey, that sounds like a cool scifi kids's book in need of writing. 😁
@S.P.A. Roland Chang I like it. The newest family-friendly franchise. 😄
Smart enough to make heaps of coin by by telling state sanctioned lies to people who have lost, or never had, the ability to think critically.
He comfortably fits within my definition of disgusting. His ability to tell such insane stories without bursting into laughter is impressive. If he's a "good" person then I don't want to be. :)
Yeah and he think he's the one to settle the god question, and he would succeed where millions have failed. What an ego he must have, to think his arguments were even close to being original or novel ideas.
I do love watching professional apologists get picked apart. It’s my guilty pleasure m.
I grew up in a splinter faction of this maniacs ' church, reared on these same willfully ignorant claims. Thank you for doing this.
It pisses me off hearing them intentionally lie, but that's at the heart of every religious claims. Lie, lie, lie.
Hearing them lie does not piss me off. A con-man's gonna do what con-man's gonna do. Knowing that there are people out there who intentionally and maliciously remain ignorant enough to *believe* those lies pisses me off.
@@pizzedahff3127 exactly! The liars are only protecting their livelihoods at this point. Imagine what would happen if they actually "came out" with the truth. Every church and coffer would be empty and religious based jobs would be gone. Not to mention any aggression or violence that could pursue.
The people that truly do believe are just blinded by their faith in a fantastical afterlife.
💯
They actually aren't lying. They believe.
Edit: some believe. Some lie to make money
No, that's Satan you're thinking of. Try again.
I remember watching this years ago, and even then I wasn’t convinced - I was a theistic evolution proponent at the time and I thought this guy didn’t understand Darwinian evolutionary theory at all
Brilliant analysis! Would love to see you tackle part 2.
I violated the 2nd law of thermodynamics this morning when I made the bed. Oh wait...
D. C. Pack's understanding of science is equivalent to somebody reading the first sentence in The Lord of the Rings and believing they know and understood the story of the novel.
I’m always appalled at the confidence exuded from these people, guess that’s why they’re so successful at demonstrable grifts
Omg, i've only watched Aron Ra rip this one
One of the best voices on the platform.
Thanks for sharing, you have the unique tone to keep us all coming back.
Re. Cesium clock: "Imagine if your watch was that accurate."
Well, why isn't it? Because accurate watches were difficult to discover and make? Doesn't that defeat his point?
Why did God allegedly make watches, for us or for himself?
If those accurate watches were for us, why was it so difficult for us to find them and take advantage of them?
He made all these watches for us, but the trick is you need to misuse or misinterpret the tool you use to find it to get the *correct answer*. Imagine if your watch required you to multiply it by a random number to get the correct time.
Is that Mitch McConnell's brother or something?
When Mitch speaks, you can actually *hear* his jowls.
Too high energy for the turtle man.
It wouldn't surprise me, actually, knowing McConnell.
Yes on part 2 please! This one was awesome!
That NOVA episode about the Dover trial was one of the best episodes ever.
Paul, Great presentation. You, PoZ and Viced Rhino helped to keep me sane throughput this election cycle and I will be forever grateful! It was a white-knuckel ride and I watched almost your entire catalogue!
The three channels that grounded my reality in this unreal time.
Happy Holidays to you and your family. Your efforts are appreciated.
Paul you have tons of great videos, but this might be my favorite, what a great job
My favourite argument:
Minister: God is real!
Me: Prove it.
Minister: That's not how it works.
Me: I am God!
Minister: Prove it.
Me: That's not how it works.
Good to see you, Paul! Your videos always make me smile.
This was fun, so: Yes please, make a part two!
16:07 He says that "Matter and energy can neither be created nor destroyed"; a few seconds later, he then says "...a specific moment in which it was created..."
Facepalm
YES, we need a part two! I love listening to your video so I can figure out which fallacious argument are present.
I had forgotten all about this fool, thank you for reminding me. David C Packs collection of absolutely unsupported claims.
Pack of Lies. 🤥.
I’m an ex Christian like Paulogia. I deconverted in March of this year. I’ve seen this video before, and by God it is still an embarrassment. Christian apologists never realize how dumb their arguments are.
That because their arguments are targeted at Christians. so of course they sound stupid. Because their only purpose is too reconfirm what they already believe.
🎉 Congratulations!🎈
And welcome to reality.
I am an ex-Christian too, and studied religion at a Catholic university where they embrace both science and religion as compatible. This type of apologetics is embarrassing to everyone except those making the arguments and their delusional followers. My super religious aunt even laughs at them, saying you have to be crazy to be that blind to reality.
@@derreckwalls7508 of course it’s targeted at the uneducated.
Depends on the apologist. Some of them are just outright lying douchebags all of the time. With people like Pack, it's questionable. In the AronRa series there's an victim who escaped Pack's cult who says that Pack has never read a book he didn't write himself, so it's more probably that he doesn't know how stupid he is. Others, like D'Souza or Craig, know full well how full of shit they are.
The real problem is that their _victims_ don't know how dumb their arguments are. _That_ is universally true. Even people who think Pack is an embarrassment will eat up the exact same bullshit if it's regurgitated by a different apologist. You haven't been exposed to as much of it from the sane side of the fence for very long, so you might not be familiar with the sheer fanboyism involved.
Glad you escaped. Welcome to sanity.
@PLANT POWERED PUNK How did you come up with multiple Antichrists? If Luke isn't true and you disregard Paul, then what religion are you? If the Antichrist(s) already were around back in ancient times, then why didn't the world end? Or, do you have a different meaning of Antichrist?
It sounds like you are one of those 'holy spirit' interpreters that believes whatever they want without any real coherence, and then claim to be the only 'true' Christian's. Are you one of the enlightened 'true Christians' that God speaks to personally? If not, how do you know that Luke and Paul are satanic heretic. And if Luke and Paul are preverted, then wouldn't that put the legitimacy of the whole New Testament into question, and so the whole Bible?
It's this kind of nonsense that makes Christianity so difficult to swallow for a lot of people. There is so much discention between denominations (and non denominations) that they may as well be different religions all together. And if they are all going to contradict each other to the point of being incompatible, then what sense does it make to believe in ANY of it? Without evidence for one belief over another even within Christianity, not to mention all the other theistic religions, choosing one is just guessing which one might be right. That's just totally arbitrary and irrational. What's the point?
I don't think you understand at all why people deconvert, or you wouldn't have brought up the idiocy of an Antichrist. Supernatural demons and a final judgement doomsday is a good reason not to believe right there! That's even more ridiculous when so many holy inspired prophets and preachers have been told by God that the end was near and... well... it wasn't. Either God is lying to them or they delusionally believed God was talking to them or, most probably, none of that crap is true and it's nothing but a bunch of psychobabble.
Easy to understand, informative. Great work, thank you.
Oh boy you are finally tackling this series.
I would love for you to cover part 2, this guy was a wreck all over the place
Oh, wow! This is wonderful, Paul! While AronRa covered the same series in a great series of his own, I really love your take and attention to details Aron didn't cover in the same way or depth. I very much hope you continue this series!
Sending you some love from Rationality Rules. He was right, this is an excellent channel.
Paulogia, darn my phone, I did get notified, but then, if I can't watch right away, it hides it from me! I love your answers to this nimrod. And yes, I saw Arons', too. But I'm so glad you are doing this. The guy uses many of the tactics of those who radicalize people. Little bits of truth, a lot of , if not outright lies, at least total misconceptions. And they are the ones who keep saying the universe 'popped into being from nothing!' With a few magic words, of course. He's way behind the times. You, of course did great! Excellent video! 👍💞✌😷🎃
Please do part 2 this is the kind of shows my mom watches it will be great to show her the debunks
Have you ever noticed the relationship between narrow eye spacing and religious credulity?
Great episode. I'd like to see a part 2.
I really enjoy your videos. Good job. The problem I have with the subject is that it's become so beat up and thread bare now. This used to concern me very much, but I'm an American, and I'm too worried about bringing the plague home to my elderly mother, and surviving a coup. So I'm just too, too tired to worry about this now. Wish Canada would have me, but I'm too old and have a chronic illness, so I'd be a burden on your health care system. Thanks for your work, I really enjoy it. I'm a patron on Patreon, just a small amount
ALMOST forgot! MAKE A PART TWO! 🙂
Yeah! We all need a laugh these days...
Uh oh, this nutter. Good luck Paul, we're all counting on you.
Love this vid. Subscribed!
Love how they jump on thermodynamics law then immediately say god can do anything anyway including breaking the law they just invoked.
Since god doesn't exist, I went ahead and hit the like button here on his behalf.
Lol
God is real
@@chadrasmussen6127 Can you validate that claim?
Not really but I wish it was real lol
@@chadrasmussen6127 that's interesting. Which God do you want to be real?
im glad my parents left the disicion of belief in my own hands, so they dint try to impose religion on my like most parents do, they just told me, im free to believe or not believe, and to wait with baptism until im 18.
im a proud atheist, and my parents supported my decision.
we used to go to church sometimes, but from childhood i never felt "at home" in a church, i always felt more at home when i was me alone in the wilderness and nature, or me alone on the beach on a deserted island about 2 hours by boat from where i live.
i love bieng alone in the woods and rest in the shadow of a tree and let my thoughts flow.
many peop-le called me satanic for this, but i dont give a flying f****
How could anyone be comfortable when surrounded by so many people that are crazy enough to believe in magic men in the sky. Highly dangerous, if you fart at the wrong millisecond they may well lynch ya. :)
oh hey. Aron Ra's series on this is one of my favorites of his. Should be interesting to see how Paul handles it.
Arom Ra reviewed this whole series. So glad to see Paul also doing it
"Absolut(e) proof": he is either talking about the alcohol content of a Vodka product or axiomatic statements in Propositional Calculus. Beyond that, there is no such thing.
Oh dear, a preacher who doesn't seem to understand that energy can become matter and vice versa. (Or, matter is just another form of energy)
"He is probably not tapping that thumbs up button..." made me laugh under a minute in. Thumbs up already earned.
Heh. Thanks, Fredrik.
Please do continue with this guy!