Did the Riverside County Sheriff Abuse his Police K9
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 гру 2023
- Recently the Riverside Sheriff's Department has come under attack for a video that shows a K9 officer forcing his police dog to the ground after an attempted bite to the officer.
Was this officer guilty of abusing his police dog? I break this down frame by frame with one of the leading experts on police dogs and military dogs, Steve Stoops. We analyze each frame of the video and explain it in a way you WILL NOT find anywhere else.
#policedog #riversidecounty #sheriff - Домашні улюбленці та дикі тварини
For the most part, people saw the value in this video breakdown.. However some are ignorant to facts or the reality of serious dogs. For the few completely ignorant comments claiming I "back the blue" blindly, perhaps you missed my breakdown of the cop who shot the lab/golden mix... I am never to go for public opinion nor likes... I tell the truth!
Trolls gonna troll, bakers gonna bake and real trainers will be training improving while the trolls fingers spark against the keyboard 😂
Have you studied " The Triune Brain " and "Polyvagal theory"?
When fight flight fails and the mammal is caught by the predator, having no escape, an older survival mechanism called "Dorsal Vagal
shutdown" takes place, it is a survival mechanism to feign death so that the predator will stop mauling.
When a dog trainer slams the dog and pins him down the dog goes into dorsal vagal shutdown, he is not submitting to the "a[pha"
(there is no dominance between different species), he is submitting to perceived death hoping the "predator" will stop mauling him get distracted and give chance to get away.
This is the same mechanism involved when someone plays dead and survives a bear attack.
The guy you called on the video has no education on the subject, what he does works not by the reason he thinks. Also, just because someone has been doing something wrong for a long time it does not make it right.
This kind of dog training is animal cruelty performed by cowards.
Your breakdown of the 14 seconds? 😂
I’m also not “ignorant”.
I’ve own and train GSD’s.
@@rodvan-zeller6360
Exactly.
Robert, your still refusing to address if it was acceptable to punch the dog 3 seconds after the corection. Then the dogs tail goes down after wagging. He got suckered punched for being a good pup walking back to the car while wagging his tail. Robert-do you really think he should of hit his dog ???? Is it OK to hit him 5 seconds, 10 seconds after the corection, when is it to late and is wrong, and a bad training experience for the dog.
Those sheriffs raided the UA-camrs house in retaliation. Wild stuff
I read on his video that they charged him with 12 felonies and he hasn't posted since.
@@KayXoXo4where can i find information on this
1. The officer just had a dog die
2. Why is the dog not trained?
3. What was the reason the officer brought the untrained dog out?
4. The K9 units have beware of K9 on the door, which this one doesn't.
Trained dogs do not bite owners unless abused by the owner
So you can attest that a dog handler with a trained dog will NEVER bite a handler? Wow I didn't know you could 100% guarantee the behavior of a wild animal. Amazing....
Where can I find that video? Who is the content creator?
Stupidest question I heard the cop say was why do you have a taser? I have one for self protection. It's like the cops think the public should not own self protection devices.
Not a stupid question just one the goons want to avoid. They have police gangs in these precints as well.
That's exactly what they think. If it were up to them they'd take away all your rights.
@@DMundusIn PA the number one pushers for gun regulation are the police unions/lobbyist groups.
They’ve tried at least half a dozen times in the last decade to require classes for CCW(classes that only they’re allowed to teach and can charge whatever price they want while giving their friends and families discounts I am personally not against classes but they should be free.). They tried to limit ammo to FFLs only and require those FFLs to submit a form to state police every time someone purchases ammo. They’ve also tried to pass firearm taxes(that they’re exempt from) where the extra tax revenue would’ve went directly into their budgets.
They’re tyrants
I think it’s more him wearing it exactly like a handgun.
How else do you holster a taser? Yet another stupid question.
We investigated ourselves and found no wrong doing.
Maybe educate yourself before making such a comment. Oh wait, you're probably one of those purely positive people
You are the only one uneducated here.
Exactly
@@dianadelcastillo1896more like yet another keyboard warrior mate. Since Covid, media platforms are full of them.
There is no abuse in this situation , did you look at the clip . And process it with the knowledge gained from training defense dogs .
I watched the original video and in my opinion they didn’t need the dog in the first place. The man was complying, there are already 2 backup officers. They don’t show reliable percentage of hitting on drugs & police make them indicate drugs just to search.
Wrong..dogs have a far greater ability to smell than humans do..they smell with a comparable ability as we see..their accuracy is spectacular. Comments like this just show how ppl all have an opinion, an agenda, and a platform to spread ignorance.
Dog has to be used to learn
How do you think these dog's get real life training?
I agree dogs have a great sense of smell but when bad police lie & say the dogs smell drugs when they don’t not good. I don’t have an agenda. You are correct I have an opinion the same way you voiced yours.
@@mr_seda66 What has a dog marking drugs, got to do with this video?
And when the officer struck the dog with his right hand on the way back to the vehicle, was that just a corrective smack?
He balled fist and struck it in the snout. The handler took the dog out to intimidate not to work and it grew anxious. The cops know the guy they arrested by name. He’s an auditor and cop watcher. The cops have it out for him.
Have you ever gotten bitten by a dog? I'm not talking about your chiwawa.
The dog was properly corrected by the officer.
Ppl bitching here probably hit their kids harder…. Dogs wagging his tail the whole time….. I’d live to see what these idiots would do when & if their dog grabbed them….. 🙄🤡
@@CS-pi5ocI guess we watched different videos…the one I watched, he used an open hand to smack the dog on the nose!
Cop covers for another cop. 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Exactly my boy!!!
They investigated themselves and found no wrong doing.
He assaulted a officer of the law he should be in jail lock him up a.s.a.p
As usual
@@pgnandt "investigation "
I have a high drive, working protection Malinois. When doing bite work, holding her by the harness, my dog sometimes twists a little, trying to get me to let her go. Thankfully, I’ve never been bitten, nor snapped at. This only occurs when mine is losing her shit, trying to get at the decoy. These are hard dogs, that need discipline from time to time.
Especially mals.
Bruh lmaoooo just abusing animals 😂
Was the handler punching the dog in the face as they were walking away also a correction?
Yes, the dog didn't even get the proper correction to be honest. He was on camera and a proper correction doesn't look pretty, so He was afraid that uneducated cry babies like yourself were going to criticize him and you know what???? He was right.
Yes
Yes- but they won't address it in this video because they don't want to look dumb AF
That was way more than correction, it was brutally. Just because trainers are used to doing stuff like that as a correction action doesn’t make it right.
.How do we know how he handles the dog all the time.If I did that to my dog in public I would be arrested.
Well if you had a high drive mal or reactive aggressive rehab dog , yes I agree you should not be out in public . As you lack the skill to control these dogs .
@@stevemartin5581 just like the cops. difference is the cops are allowed to let the dog maul innocents
6:18 Don’t worry. His department will back him whether he did anything wrong or not.
You apparently don't know police departments very well.
When the dog was in the prone position after it was corrected it went for the officer for a second time
I saw that too. But they never mentioned that.
Ok, we can have all these people come on this channel an act like they are all Canine behavioral professionals and back up the officer and Steve Stoops that fact that what he did was warranted and if this dog was in a pack and Alpha and discipline etc. However, IT CLEARLY does not take a professional to know that was clear slam to the asphalt after picking up the dog. Sorry Steve Stoops, I know as you being in the fields yourself you are going to 100% protect the officers wrong doing. But this video clearly shows wrong doing and poor trained handling of the K9. And for you people who seem to think the dog getting hit before being put in the car is warranted because you think he tried ti nip again. THE DOG IS ALSO TRAINED TO PROTECT ITSELF! WHICH IT EXACTLY DID THAT AFTER THE OFFICER SLAMMED HIM TO THE ASPHALT.. The officer 'HIT HIM' THEY DONT GET TRAINED LIKE THAT. Steeve Stoops knows better than that. The officer clearly needs K9 training and temper control discipline.
Realistically, the correction was valid. Dog redirected onto handler, was submitted, did not submit, and was removed. HOWEVER, the dog shouldn’t even be out of the car. This is a cooperative suspect being detained - the dog likely knows the game ends when the suspect is handcuffed, but he didn’t even get to chase or bite yet, of course he’s frustrated. The dog snapping multiple times while being held down is probably a sign of a poor bond - he is willing to commit to attacking his handler to get to the game, the handler isn’t relevant to him.
Agreed, i also don't like the quick shot to the snout on the way back to the vehicle. That was emotional. Discipline shouldn't be emotional.
What I see is the officer's actions were based on anger. Didn't even give the dog time to submit. Also showing a dog who's boss is done through the dogs neck. Not a body harness though useful after that fact. BTW I saw a defensive bite from the dog. Frustration. Spooled up dog brain out of control. After all the dog was trained to bite the sh*t out of people so lol.
There is no such thing as dominance submission between different species, this was based on a bad experiment that was recanted by the author of it
Most cops are sado- masochist and have sociopathic/psychopathic tendency.
I know cuz I am a High functioning sociopath so it's not that hard to sense this when you deal with cops. They most likely get a rise/sexual excitement by making other men cowar. People won't believe this cuz they don't have the same mentality as a sociopathic/psychopathic human. But that's the cold hard truth.
Ok, we can have all these people come on this channel an act like they are all Canine behavioral professionals and back up the officer and Steve Stoops that fact that what he did was warranted and if this dog was in a pack and Alpha and discipline etc. However, IT CLEARLY does not take a professional to know that was clear slam to the asphalt after picking up the dog. Sorry Steve Stoops, I know as you being in the fields yourself you are going to 100% protect the officers wrong doing. But this video clearly shows wrong doing and poor trained handling of the K9. And for you people who seem to think the dog getting hit before being put in the car is warranted because you think he tried ti nip again. THE DOG IS ALSO TRAINED TO PROTECT ITSELF! WHICH IT EXACTLY DID THAT AFTER THE OFFICER SLAMMED HIM TO THE ASPHALT.. The officer 'HIT HIM' THEY DONT GET TRAINED LIKE THAT. Steeve Stoops knows better than that. The officer clearly needs K9 training and temper control discipline.
The correction itself i get, but I think the main argument is that the dog shouldnt have been brought out in the first place, the dog is used to coming out and getting into action, doing its job of taking down the threat. He was using the dog to scare this man and upon walking up the dog thought it was time to get to action but he held the dog back from doing his job basically leading to some behavior of retaliation because that dog has such a high drive that it NEEDS to do what its trained to do and will dp whatever it takes to get there.
So what you're saying is the dog was being used as a deterrence... Not only physically, but psychologically as well... It's also their job 😂😂
Listen to what you’re saying, it’s insane. It basically amounts to ‘dogs shouldn’t be used by police unless the dog is allowed to ‘take down’ somebody’. If this happens the doggies feelings will be hurt it’s abusive…to the dog, somehow.
I 100% disagree with you as a police officer of over 5 years. I've worked with numerous k9s in situations such as these.
Having a k9 is a huge responsibility and liability. You need to know policy and case law like it's your job. When you are allowed to deploy the dog, when you're not. Theres a million different scenerios to play out or one fact could be the difference between being justified in gettkng your dog out and not. You would not get the dog out if you never planned on using him/her.
The fact that he had the dog out, from my experience, means he was justified in using the dog if he had too. It's not solely as a deterent.
What are the circumstances? What was the crime/or alleged crime committed? Was the person armed or known to be armed? What were the call comments of the complainant, if it was not a self initiated call? Did officers have previous experienced with this individual? All of these matter and are thought about when getting the dog out. To say he just got the dog out as a deterent and a flex, in a sense, is just ignorant of police k9 procedure.
omg the guy had his hands behind his head lol. The dog being brougt out was all a show.@camonly849
Bad expert.... horrible handler
3 officers had total control of situation. There was no reason for dog to be out. Hopefully k9 gets more training and a competent handler.
FACTS💯
You've clearly never had a Malinois
I love how the non expert gives his opinion on something they know nothing about. There's so many people like you out there.
@@camonly849 we train and handle working dogs.
I feel sorry for the dog having that p.o.s for a handler... needs to lose the badge if he's that abusive with his k9 companion... shouldn't be anywhere near them if thats how he treats them...
This is just a sample of what he does on duty just wonder what he does when he gets home 😮
The handler fist punched the dog in the snout on the way to the car too. They didn’t bring that up.
@@CS-pi5ocof course not
Yeah think of hoe much abuse this dog gets off camera?
His poor wife
The dog was repeatedly biting his handler in a dangerous situation. You'd be squealing and peeing your pants in this situation.
The investigation should also include
a. what was the call for
b. was the "suspect" a dangerous person
c. was there a need of a K-9 unit
d. in what citations a dog is used during a stop
e. did this stop have merit for a dog to be brought out
f. could this be avoided
The dog should have never been brought out of the vehicle,it was used to intimidate the guy
Not necessarily. It still warrants an investigation though because that is a possibility. Cop seems to be well liked and respected, but that should be reported and inquired.
@@grt49erfools are often liked and respected. Especially in your country.
@@mr-iz8cx Not really. Things progress and ideas and beliefs are found to be untrue. It wouldn’t be unusual if this is some issue of past protocols still in place. It can also be someone or organization not truly understanding how to effectively use new methods.
There are the same proportion of fools in every country. We just invented the technology that prevents fools, despots, and psychopaths from hiding. I don’t think that handler is any of those things. I don’t own a gun. It’s not my thing. While other politicians in other countries are scared their people might have guns our politicians fight to make sure we have the right to carry them. Our politicians fight for the right to have the best ones. Freedom is not easy. I am not sure what country you are from. Let me know. Next time we have a disaster and your country sends us help I can thank them.
Look at what that handler does when that dog bites him. He is a very good dog handler. He is better than the two narrating. I didn’t see him punch the dog. If he did he should probably stop doing that.
And that is why you deploy a dog , there presence is intimating . They stop situations from getting out of hand .
Those damned cameras are lethal.@@stevemartin5581
This guy is not a suspect, he's a patriotic auditor.
Exactly! This guy had his rights violated, but these bootlicking radicals don't really understand what really happened.
I'm not going to watch the entire video. Did they address the officer hitting the dog in face?
They take an Oath to the constitution but most don't know the constitution!
....and you lick boots.
There is nothing patriotic about most “auditors”.
You missed the whole point. It was about the correcting the dog.
I didn't see just one attempt to bite but during and after correcting, the dog attempted to bite 2 more times. The dog needs some retraining.
Pity they can't train the handler.
@@sueshivers5120the handler did nothing wrong at all, all you could see was a dog, a K9 is more than just a dog he is a trained officer, trained to take down criminals, just like his partner and handler is.
you just can not treat a K9 as a pet, that dog could have been put down because he tried to bite his handler because it wanted to get at the criminal.
The handler did the right thing right away it admonished the K9 for doing something wrong. If it is not done right away but done later the dog would not understand why it was being told off later.
He will have more training because he tried to bite the handler, training will help both the K9 and handler because they must train together to learn to trust each other.
A K9 as a rule will only ever have one handler in its career as a K9. The reason for this is both the handler and the dog must trust each other when on the job. The only time I have known of a K9 having had 2 handlers in its life is when his partner has died. An officer close to retirement will not be given a K9 unless his retirement falls inline with the K9
A K9 only works for a very few short years, it ranges from 7-11 years of age on the job, after that they get to live out their retirement with a police officer and his or her family, it’s very rare for them to retire outside of the force.
The dog is literally being choked out the entire time
@sueshivers5120 ..and if you were attacked by a dog I bet you'd be very pleased to have Shane as a passerby. Malinois and many others are VERY dangerous dogs in the wrong hands and commonsense and experience would tell that you are not dealing with a Shitzu.
@@robynmafileo8633Having worked in kennels over the years I would say that I am experienced in the handling of dogs, so do not lecture me on the characteristics of different breeds. So, you think that if I was being attacked by a dog you would bet that I'd be very pleased to have that excuse for a human being as a passerby who would come to my rescue. How delusional are you? I'd pick the dog any day.
The focus should be on the illegal detainment not on the handling of the dog. Civil rights violations are crimes!!
Leave it to the judge. Otherwise, no one cares.
@@GEDonlyUnplug your feeding tube
Wow maybe the dog knows something the humans don’t?
it was just a redirection, prominent with Malis or Dutchies in high drive, some Pitties as well, happens but can be solved in most cases, but not without correcting the dog physically... You people are just the usual NPCs
@@nordics834stfu only time a dog bites its own owner is if it's getting abused by them. No one I know in history gets bit by their own dogs
A police officer making excuses for a fellow officer that mistreated a dog. What a surprise 🙄
I didn’t even need the explanation. Saw the dog redirected to the handler… what do these crybabies want? For the cop to get mauled and not correct???
Their goal is for dogs to be removed from all roles in which they are owned by or controlled by a human. There's no real way to win, if he had just let the dog maul him the same people would have used it to campaign for the removal of dogs from working roles, if he corrects the dog they try to reach the same outcome by claiming abuse and using that to try and make corrections illegal. This started with making it illegal for people to physically discipline their own children and the same people have to keep the crusade going into other areas, now the world won't just be filled with arsehole humans that can't control themselves but dogs as well.
I was wondering that too!
The dog redirected out of tension it's extremely normal for a high drive working dog like a Mal to do that it's not okay to punch your dog in the nose and slam it on the ground either that's not how you handle the situation whatsoever
For me, if that handler is so great, why couldn't he see the obvious? This dog isn't ready for work and it's irresponsible to use him in general. Secondly, this particular situation was nowhere close to calling for drawn guns and dogs..... the handler simply wanted to intimidate a guy with a camera and made a bad decision.
@@migidymarsh Let's focus on the dog & the handler. A working dog needs to start somewhere coz simulation training cannot accurately depict the intangibles of real world situations. The energy is different. So at some point, the dog needs to do real work. That Dog is young so maybe lacks experience and still needs to practice a level of impulse control, as well as needing reminders of who is in charge. The handler did what needed to be done, no more, no less. Dogs body language after the interaction was still excited and confident. Trained Dogs KNOW when they've screwed up and understand that that's why they got a correction.
The bottom line is that dog should have never been put in that situation in the first place. You don't pull a police dog out on a guy protesting/auditing. And yes these officers know him. That dog should be used in serious situations not to harass a person exercising their constitutional rights. Those officers wanted to step on the Constitution and got bit for it and the dog got body slammed for it. Those dogs are extremely aggressive and should only be used in the most serious situations. Not to try to intimidate a citizen that you know only has a taser. Real men don't step on the Constitution. And I guarantee you I've been working with animals longer than any of these people. From animal hospitals, animal sanctuary's, dog grooming shops and dog training. My biggest problem is that they put this dog in that situation in the first place. There's a time and a place for it and this wasn't it. A police officer friend of mine's dog tore my daughter's head apart. I know these dogs are not stable most of the time. And it usually shows. This is just one of many examples you can find.
This is pure insanity to think that was the proper situation to pull an aggressive dog out on someone. It would be considered assault if I threatened someone with my aggressive dog but it's perfectly fine for the police department.🤔
I have seen several videos that involved so called "auditors".
What is it they are "auditing" and why?
Who sends them out to do this auditing?
Who pays their salary?
What happens to the results of this audit?
@@sandrachebo I used to really dislike when people would do these auditing things. But once I started to realize how many police officers didn't know people's constitutional rights it made me sick to my stomach. Tackling people just for video taping/ Recording? Overtime these sergeants learn people's constitutional rights and then they have to teach their deputies or officers.
But I don't think anyone sends them out. I believe they just make money off UA-cam videos. I 100% support them sticking up for vendors but a few of these guys get very racial and prejudice themselves. Which defeats the whole purpose. And that's just my opinion.
I have a fairly low drive Mal even though both her parents are police dogs. Anyone who is complaining about how the officer treated the Mal has never dealt with a Mal
Your words in gods ear!! The people today have no clue but a BIG mouth! A Poodle and a real good bred working dog is in NO WAY to compare!!! But they do it anyway. Stupid people!!!
Because there are breed specific characteristiks. A Labrador you can stop with a screaming loud voice yelling "NO" . A good bred working dog in every feeld of work or sport will LOUGH about that when the animal is in high drive! You havent owned or worked with enough dogs to know that it seems.@@garyurtiaga9426
@@garyurtiaga9426 This is not abuse though. If you don't put these dogs down, they'll walk all over you.
@@garyurtiaga9426 I'm guessing with this reply you've never even been in the same room as a malinois, let alone a police dog. Why do you have an opinion on something you have no experience of? Have you ever had your hand in a malinois's mouth?
Shane may have corrected, but if I hit my dog like that in front of a cop, animal care etc. Then I know I would have been treated like a criminal. There is discipline and discipline. It's like scratching your back and tearing it to pieces. Rather than just relieving the itch.
You can’t say that for 100%. If you get bit by your dog and correct it in front of an officer. They ain’t going to do anything. Now if you sit there and hit your dog for no reason, well…
If your dog was trying to bite you it’s very unlikely.
My horse bites me and they get a smack. My Malinois mouths me he also gets a smack and a no.
The dog was put in a position of submission and had his snout slapped after the third time trying to bite the handler.
Allowed tocontinue to behave this way, the dog would be destroyed.
The handler did the correct thing.
Dog are NOT choldren, they have thrir own hierarchy abd have to learn to behave.
@@redraven1410 your one of the only ones that has mentioned the dog aggression not one time but two to three times that resulted in the slap not fist to snout
There wan an incident about two month ago here in Germany, where an off duty police dog attacked a 73 y.o. woman who was about to enter her car and the dog actually ripped her scalp off. Lets just say I'm pretty sure that if Shane had been the one handling that dog, this wouldn't have happened. (The suitability of the dog and the handler are currently under investigation)
@@xy-pk8gb A dog can be trained to hunt rats, invasive species, protect livestock, protect people, respond to riots, herd cattle and livestock. For centuries we have used the traits of the dog to perform tasks that can carry risk. Banning a dog from performing any kind of duty, you think they're all going to suddenly start being happy lap dogs who just want to go on a walkies now and then?
@@xy-pk8gb So I get that some people might think that way BUT let me just rant for a second here. I am a german dog owner and I live in a country where ALL "abusive" training tools are banned by law. No e-collars, prongs, chains, etc. and even neutering ist forbidden except for rescue dogs or for medical reasons. Why are those tools banned? Because uneducated people will misuse them. One might think that banning those tools solved the problem BUT what actually happens is that those people who misused those tools to hurt their dogs are just switching tactics and I have seen someone grab their dogs muzzle and lift it off the ground while their dog was screaming... so do you think banning these tools made a difference for this dog? On the other hand, people who genuinely want to work with their dogs or people who have real behavioral problems with their dogs are FORCED to work with positive only trainers whose opinion is, and I quote "If your dog is pulling on the leash, while wearing a collar (and they meant just a regular one), you as a person are exercising violence toward your dog" - and balanced dog trainers are just literally dying out, and not because of the tools they are now unable to use but because suddenly every kind of correction is seen as abusive. I can honestly say that it is downright scary how many people are struggling with their dogs nowadays compared to 10 years ago. It all started with the banning of tools, that spiraled into scorning balanced training until we got to a point where „if your dog jumps in your face an tries to bite you, it’s your own fault because the dog just wanted the ball in your pocket and you didn’t redirect his attention to another toy or treat on the floor fast enough“.
Now as for your comment - to „weaponize“ a dog, you would need a dog with a certain predisposition for certain behaviors. Is it irresponsible to train such a dog to exercise those behaviors in a controlled manner? Should all high drive working line breeds be just eradicated because they might not always respond to treats only? How many small dogs dogs do you know, or heard of, that have bitten someone? - do you believe these dogs were weaponized by their elderly owner? Do you really believe that the very few dogs that fortunately still have a real purpose in life and are allowed to carry out tasks for which they were bred would be better off as mere pets?
@@michelledistefano9434 the end point of this is banning dogs. The more sentimental and delusional people become, the more attacks and tragedies, and there’s just nowhere to go from there.
So even in Germany they can’t train dogs.
This isn't a training session. If your dog isn't trained and ready, why is he out there? No accountability.
Maybe learn the difference between simulation training and actual real world training. Dogs need to start real world experience somewhere. Looks like that Dog was a Rookie. And that's precisely why those corrections are necessary. The dog needed a reminder to control himself and of who is in charge. Judging by the dog's body language, he was like "Got it, chief!"
@@dianadelcastillo1896 Let’s be honest of what we see. The handler got frustrated by his work and took it as out on the dog.
The dog learned nothing from that experience.
Now that poor dog will be drilled till he gets it “right”or fired because he “messed up.”
I feel for the handler because we’ve all been there. We get frustrated blame the dog and realize it was our fault.
Behavior is a consequence of what happens.
trying to blow sunshine in a sh!t shower. No thanks!
I live in Riverside County and have dealt with the sheriff's deputies quite often, they have a track record of not getting their K9 units act together. I have seen dogs that seem to be taken out too soon and well-trained dogs with inexperienced handlers giving the dog mixed signals. I see it more with the Belgian Malinois they are almost too OP for the handlers and much different dogs then the German Shepards.
Did you know sheriff Chad Bianco bowed to BLM like they were his GOD and Kings? Look it up. It really happened.
The dog "tried" the handler, and learned a simple lesson that grabbing the handler's wrist is not acceptable. No biggie.
My whole life I've worked with dogs. Several animal hospitals dog grooming shops and a dog trainer. This officer was 100% in the wrong. He should have never took that dog out in that situation in the first place. Not only have I watched those dogs attack several officers one attacked my daughter. Many of these dogs are extremely aggressive and their handlers cannot properly handle them. There is a place for them but it's not to hassle a protester/auditor. Because bad things happen to innocent people including the dog. That dog's not stable enough to be in a traffic stop/pedestrian stop like this. My problem was more the fact that these cops were dumb enough to take that dog out in the situation. And they know who this guy is trying to pretend like they don't.
I know what the officers doing.
And again the guy running this channel says- should he have let the dog do that?🤦♂️ That dog should have never been put in that particular situation. This isn't a hostage situation. This is police abusing their authority with legal citizens. And it back fired on him and the dog.
And this is coming from someone who respects and supports 🚔 officers. Most the men in my family are police officers. But I do not support stupidity.
@@joeshmoe5281if that were the case then dogs would be out of a job if you can only use them for hostage situations....
@@user-su7tx1zb3v Out of a job? That's like allowing cops to step on the Constitution because if they weren't allowed to they wouldn't have a job? You don't get to create bad situations just so you have a job. Should I go throw trash all over the city so city workers have something to clean up and keep their jobs? Should glass companies break every window so they have work? Should tire companies pop tires so they have something to replace?That's the most insane thing I've ever heard. Are you worried they're going to pay this dog too much for not working hard enough?🤯
@@joeshmoe5281what was wrong with this situation and deploying the K9.
You say you work with dogs. I seriously doubt it's with working breeds. There are very specific temperament testing and training these dogs are trained for thier job and are much smarter than most people. The dog made a mistake this was a 5 sec mistake so you want to through the K9 under the bus. He did not choke kick yell slap the dog he simply put him on the ground as a correction didn't hold him there or slam him down. You need to learn something about pack dynamics. A bitch will correct a puppy that bites too hard or becomes aggressive to litter mates by biting the puppy or putting the puppy down. The puppy learns quickly not to play to rough as there will be consequences.
Something very lacking in human parenting for the last 30+ years
you dont respond by abusing the animal genius.....you obviously know little about more aggressive and potentially dangerous breeds
it looks like he punched the dog also is that part of the training?
He did. Plus the dog was nvr to be used. It was there to intimidate. The handler would let it work. Dogs shouldn’t be taken out unless there’s intent to use it.
The entire rest of the stop was a textbook of excessive force and civil rights violation, including pulling the dog out as all. The idea of "qualified immunity" ended the second the cop with the gun discovered it was a legally carried taser a few seconds into the confrontation.
BTW, it you want to claim "officer safety" combined with militarization and pseudo honor as soldiers.
With no obligation to serve or protect and the open lie training and permission to do so as "Good policing" = dishonorable. Listing citizens who stand up for their rights as troublemakers on BOLO lists is dishonorable. Repeated attempts to violate rights is dishonorable.
Removing the Dog from the Vehicle was not a use of excessive force and not a civil rights violation. Go back to school and retake US Constitution. The best part of the original video is the Loser who spend so much time acting like an ass was not arrested. You have no right to be treated with respect. It is not in the bill of rights. It is not an amendment to the constitution. If you want respect, then act respectable. Treat others with respect and you may just get it back. Walk around acting like a Prick then expect to be treated like a Prick. If you want it your way, then go to Burger king
The military is not allowed to police the citizenry kind of for that very reason.
@@bad406camaro Yeah, deploying the dog without good reason is excessive force, but he didn't do that did he.
@bad406camaro Of course this morons ID is Bad406camaro. Typical smooth brain
One slap on the dog... no malicious intent?😮
He body slammed it, then punched it...not only heclearly was pissed at the dog, his ego also took a hit...if that was a child, cps would've been in in a minute...
Ill tell you first hand that the riverside sheriff department is completely unhinged.
Ive trained dogs my whole life. This was a complete miss handling by the handler.
You CAN NOT blame the dog.
That breed uses its mouth and nose for contact on EVERYTHING.
Its how the dog communicates physically.
Dogs will learn what they are taught.
If they are taught to be aggressive they will be.
Dogs also tend to emulate their handlers emotional state as well.
That is if theres a connection.
Understanding live training and this being a LIVE situation the dog can learn from the amout of aggressive behavior from what the dog see as his PACK of couse the dog will act the same.
Knowing that breed, I have one good on the redirect poor on the handler for using a situation the dog wasn't ready for.
I know how important it is for the dog to obey, but theres no bond there.
You mentioned pack behavior.
If the pack is misbehaving then how do you think the dog is going act?
have you trained police dogs?
I have the breed in my home as a working service dog I trained. I'm not trying to say I know everything about it although I do know a lot.
There is a big difference between trainer and handler.
There has to be trust and a bond between the dog and handler. If the dog is biting there is no bond.
@@LeeFenimore1149 right but that's probably not the kind of dog that ends up in the military or on the streets with police, I've got a malinois myself but she is tame compared to the ones they select for this, would make a good service dog if I knew how to train it to do that. These dogs are trained to bite, they are police dogs, they chase down and incapacitate suspects, there are going to be situations where it goes wrong and it's something that has to be corrected. The dog here is being held back, is desperate to act and turns and acts impulsively, and something needs to be done about it quickly before tendons, nerves are permanently destroyed
No need to overcomplicate the matter, the dog challenged it’s handler and lost! Moral of this story is don’t bite the hand that feeds you and for every action there’s a reaction! Everyone’s an expert in canine behaviour or an armchair critic with no actual experience of the breed or formal qualification to back it up. How would you deal with a mailgator chomping down on your arm, applying 195 psi of bite force? Trust me it’s not fun, even with a bite suit and neoprene inserts! Anyone criticising this guy should stick to designer dogs like Cockerpoo, Pomchi and Cavachon! This dog has the best handler he could ever wish for who is laying some ground rules, which unfortunately is sadly lacking in most pet homes when people try and fail to turn them into fur babies.
Nope, that was a nip, not a full on bite. If the dog did a full on bite he would have been sent to the hospital to get it checked out.
My Malinois redirected on me for grabbing her collar to stop her from killing my GSD when I brought him home. I gave her a harsh ecollar correction and let her know that is unacceptable and will not happen again. She's now a little over 3 and my GSG is 1 1/2 and nothing like this has ever happened again. Dogs need correction to learn right from wrong. Do parents these days let their kids physically abuse them without any consequences? 🤔 (I have 4 kids. I most certainly teach my kids right from wrong and would NEVER allow my kids to treat anybody the way some parents do.)
Yes it’s called training . Most do it before and to prevent this from happening. Maybe this dogs to young or maybe it’s always stuck in the backseat doing paperwork. But don’t get in public and show you can’t control your k9. If any one of us did this in public
There was no reason for the dog in the first place it was used for intimidation and the dog was reacting to the officers around him end of story, cop should be fired and the others should be fired for breaking the law!
Damn that is so true.
Yep intimidation for sure, the dog was used as an extention of the cops penis so he could look like Billy big balls
If you look at the video. The dog was still trying to bite him while on the ground
Because when you slam a dog like that and hold it down it triggers fight or flight the dog couldn't flight so he fought if he continues to hold the dog down he would of been bitten regardless I'm disappointed that Robert and his friend believe this is okay it's not
@@-demon_dog-8511 Robert should know that there is no such thing as dominance between different species.
@@-demon_dog-8511or maybe he didn't slam the dog down hard enough. Not that I'm saying he should. Obviously he used the bare minimum to get the dog back in line. I think there's a fine balance in the training of some K9s. On one hand, they have to respect & listen to their handlers. On the other hand, their high drive needs to be maintained and even built up. I'm curious, how many high drive dogs have you worked with? Wouldn't you agree that not all dogs need the same intensity of correction and that it is the handler who would know what works with his dog?
@@dianadelcastillo1896how about just don't need dogs as killers for the pigs to start with....
@@JohnSmith-zz3mq
Exactly.
And the circumstance did not warrant bringing the dog out of the cruiser to begin with.
He worked him up to terrorize the auditor.
But if a “suspect” tried to defend himself against a K9 biting him he would be charged for assault on a police officer correct ? But Since it was the handler abusing the dog it’s okay ? Got it 👍🏽
Spot on! That's exactly what would happen. But as we all know nothing will be done because some people are above the laws.
That was not animal abuse. It was a felonious attack on a peace officer. These dogs are peace officers.
Lol that's a good way to spin it! The human officer should be charged with assault.
I don’t see abuse, I see an aggressive dog who needs evaluating
@TheKak933 I do see abuse. I see an aggressive handler who needs evaluating, he should be reported to the Animal Protection Service and never been in charge of any animal ever again
Nope. Quick and to the point and it was over. The communication was very clear to the dog.
Is this the same guy whose dog was shot last year ... dog named Rudy ?
I own a Belgian Malinois! That action was 💯 % appropriate. These dogs RESPECT a skilled K9 handler. I do the exact same thing with my dog. He is extremely loyal and we spend a ton of time together - he is an extremely important pack member and protector. But he also likes to be aggressive and you have to control that and focus the energy
Well said
abuse takes no skill genius
Robert, I think your one of the best dog trainers out there but I know you would not hit any dog after you let him up after a correction. Robert you have to agree deep down that the officer went to far punching him. If I did that to my Cane Corso I don't know if he would forgive me, and probably scare him. That dog is worth to much money to get suckered punched. That officer is suppose to protect his dog, punching a dog 3 seconds afterwards is abuse and I can't believe you didn't commit about the punch.
@@LokiCutlerCreekI also noticed that additional cheap shot on the way to the vehicle. That was uncalled for and shows that the officer himself is emotionally immature and not ready to be a handler, at least not for this k9
Don't try to compare yourself to these deluded abusive domestic terrorists. Seriously, you are saying you abuse your dog every day by training it to be a police dog? You punch your dog in the face every day? You are inadequate as a dog trainer too? You take your daily-abused dog out in public to menace innocent people and then punch it in the face because it's doing the aggressive behavior you reinforced through daily abusive training? I doubt it. I bet your dog is treated well and trained to be an asset to society, not to bite indiscriminately.
Damn Robert I gotta say, there’s no way you’re right about this one. A lil tooth tap from a working dog does not justify that extreme of a response. When we get working dogs we know they will get toothy, it’s a part of the job. Not that it should be accepted though, When dogs are redirecting like this and being a little bit of an asshole, you HAVE TO GUAGE THE SITUATION. Not every little thing needs an intense response. It seems more likely that this handler, like most k-9 handlers, has a huge ego and believes in alpha bull shit. A sharp tap on the dogs snout would’ve done the job, or maybe utilization of a leash???
Everyone is wondering why balanced trainers are losing the fight against positive only advocates and videos like this are exactly why. We need to advocate for NUANCE. Not everything needs an intense correction, and not everything needs a slightly aversive correction. You have to learn to judge the situation for what it is, keep your cool, and act accordingly. Just cause your face is straight and you’re not screaming doesn’t mean it was an appropriate correction.
There’s only 2 reasons to harm a dog, 1.) if they are going to seriously harm or injure themselves far beyond what your correction will provide Or 2.) they are going to seriously harm or injure another living being.
People who treat dogs like this obviously have a shit relationship with their dog and do not do their research on dog behavior. This is an example of a trainer/handler who would say they’re balanced, but really they’re just fucking lazy. They just want to have a bad ass dog and are sacrificing the relationship building because it’s harder to work on that than it is to be heavy handed.
Tired of people justifying over-corrections and not leaning into the fact that training dogs, just as any other animal, requires NUANCE.
I hope everyone reads this. I completely agree with you. I don't think that a dog should be slammed to the ground for any reason, except if it is attacking something that it shouldn't. I think the training that they are using is wrong!
The handler was choking the dog out, that’s why the dog responded. 🤦🏽♀️
Thank you so much for your very precious, important, fair work!
Hey sir I wanted your insight on disciplinary action towards puppies. I just bought a GSD/ Belgian mal and over the week I’ve had him he’s improved a lot. I wanted to ask if I could or should be slightly physical with him if he misbehaves doing something really bad like biting the face and by being physical I mean a light finger swat on his snout. I don’t want something like this to develop into aggression or retaliation as he gets older so I figured the best person to ask would be you and anyone else who may have the knowledge. Puppy just turned 8 weeks
I disagree with your assessment, but let me be clear, there needs to be consequences for the dogs actions, however his correction seems to come from a place of anger, not clear pure correction. As a vet professional I know what it is to be bitten, I also know reaction from anger is not training, it's reaction, and usually counter productive, humans can reason, dogs less so. The smack to the face at the end re-enforced the anger aspect. Taking a biting down to the ground to control and re-assess safety is reasonable, maintaining control via a tight grip and leash while back to the vehicle (which he did not do) is reasonable and training. Hitting the dog, that's anger. As public figures why are you so afraid to call out the poor training.
Thank you. The handler is allowed to have a reaction to a dog redirecting, but it should be appropriate and productive. This is not appropriate or productive. The dog was over aroused from the minute they got it out. I’m not going to say the handler is a wicked person for having a reaction, but when you work with these high drive dogs daily you know this was a piss poor reaction. It’s my firm belief that both the human and dog need more training and the dog should be reevaluated for its suitability for this type of work. Behavior is feedback on the trainers ability to train, not the animal’s ability to learn. This could have been prevented with more through training before hand. This dog was advanced too quickly. A dog who redirects on their handler is not emotionally ready for this situation and the frustration involved in not getting to complete a bite, the game in the dogs mind. That makes it a liability to the handler and his partner.
The dog should nvr have been out of the car. Once out it knows to work and grew anxious. The handler not only slammed it but balled fist and struck it in the snout bef placing it back into the car.
I agree with your assessment 100% and found the same thing to be true and I am a bit disappointed that Robert didn't bring up that emotional punch to the snout on the way back to the cruiser. If the handler can't keep his own emotions in check how is he supposed to control the emotional state of his animal?
Where’s Zak George to protest against this video?🤣🤣 People don’t understand there’s a difference between a house dog and a WORKING dog who is expected to fulfill their job.
Working dogs should be on a farm and not used to intimidate a man with camera. Were 3 guns not enough?
3 seconds after the corection the dogs tail is waging then he gets punch in the face. He lost his temper, the punch isn't text book dog training is it?
Tail wagging? You really don’t know anything about dogs, do you? Tail wagging can mean anything, up to and including being excited to bite the crap out of someone..
@@johncspine2787 that’s not his point.
The dog went to bite and was thrown to the ground and pinned. Then he tried to bite again. Do you know why?
After that whole scene the dog was being dragged by the harness and was THEN smacked in the face.
You really think that’s proper training?
“Then this..then this..” you can’t see absolutely everything in this video, the dog certainly didn’t act like it was hurt in any way. Did it “look” like an inappropriate response for a goldendoodle not shaking his paw for you? Yes. Was it inappropriate for a police/military dog in training in one angle of a UA-cam video taken out of context? Who are you to judge?@@toyrobotus
@@johncspine2787 Who am I? Just a breeder and dog trainer. I asked you if you knew why the dog tried to bite the cop AGAIN, after “correction”, and you don’t know.
Correction of a golden doodle or a “working military dog” or a chihuahua doesn’t involve picking the animal up and slamming/pinning it to the ground.
There was NOTHING taken “out of context”, as the entire incident was clearly on video. Only a clown would try to argue those things.
This dogs behavior is nothing more than a release of nervous agression. The same nervous agression that is trained into them. With some dogs the anticipation of whats about to happen gets the better of them and they strike out. That behavior, while understandable, is not okay. But two wrongs don't make a right! Shameful! The officer also punched the dog on the way back to the car. That type of treatment is eventually going to result in an overly agressive and unstable dog.
The only reason the dog was there was to intimidate the arrested auditor and cop watcher. Dirty dealings.
Police dogs trained to attack human beings is pychopathic. This man was almost attacked by a dog was guilty of absolutely no crime. They put that man at risk of death and harm for no sane reason.
Right. Cops know the arrested guy by name. The cops hate him bc he’s a cop watcher. They know he is nvr armed.
Hold up.. your statement. 👏👏👏👏 salute
absolutely right....and this K9 officer couldnt control the animal properly and resorted to abuse due to lack of patience,,,,if you watch closely, he makes a fist and strikes it in the face while pulling it away
Handler did not hurt that dog. Handler also made sure dog didn’t get loose. This does warrant an investigation though. That dog should not been there unless it was a training drill and handcuffed guy knew it was a drill.
As a former military dog handler, it is obvious to me that Shane reacted wisely and appropriately under the circumstances. His dog has a proclivity, whenever excited, to bite whatever tethers him. Shane is aware that firm, immediate correction is necessary to keep his dog from washing out of the police dog program.
Robert, I wish I had the lexicon that you have to explain all of this to the inexperienced and/or naive.
Thank you for your experience and comment.
Why were they intending to let this dog on this apprehended subject?
Dogs correct eachother harder 😂😂😂😂
Thank you for playing this in slow motion. It’s easy to see the canine officer responded perfectly.
check it again they cut the slow motion video as the dogs head hits the floor!! you will see the video skip when they cut the section out!!
So u r ok that the officer punched the dog in the snout on the way to the car.
@@CS-pi5oc everyone seems to be ignoring that blatant abuse
No need for a dog here. This auditor is well known in the sheriff's department and all they would have needed to do is show up. This auditor carries a taser that appears as though it's a gun and I'm sure that was reported by the caller.
The cops know the auditor and cop watcher by name and that he carries a lawful to carry bright yellow taser. The dog was sent to intimidate. Dirty cop dealings.
@@CS-pi5ocauditors are annoying
@@mattk8810so are boot lickers😢
There are always two sides to every story. I just saw the abused K9 story. Rather than jump right into the fight I needed more info. I just found Robert for the rest of the story. Thank you for clearing things up. I am a new subscriber.
thank you! welcome aboard!!!
Most novice ,animal loving people, do not understand a dominate- handler aggressive working dog. Dog tried to win a battle one too many times I imagine in the past with the officer. He has to be corrected. Officer knows his dog and knew to take quick action. His dog wanted the bite-reward and took it out on his owner. Dog will eventually learn respect of his leader. It has happened to me. 8 German Shepherds later I now have a Dutch Shepherd like this too. Very social but very serious too.
I think most people know that dog should have never been pulled out in this situation. It's not as much the way he handled the dog but the way he handled the whole situation. You don't jump out on a protester with a dog you can't control properly.
Oh ok so you abuse your dogs too huh?
the dog was initially being choked out, it reacted, got slammed to the ground, slapped in the face and choked out again. If the dog had to be corrected, the cop definitely needs to be fired and go to court for animal abuse.
@@DS-jj5my no way was that dog being choked out. Laughable comment
@@DS-jj5my tell me you live in bubble wrap without telling me you do...
How do u miss the second hit to the dog as he takes it back to the carhis first as u call it correction shouldn't be phisical and the punch was over the top, if he had a good relationship with the dog he wouldnt have been bitten, a well trained dog wont bite its owner/ handler unlsee its seen miss treatment before , phisicaly attacking a fog isnt a correction it us abuse
💯
No reason why the K9 was used 3 officers for a known activist. Please explain where this is thought in the academy
They brought the dog to this situation for training. Suspect was subdued before dog got out the car. That dog has not been fully trained. I don’t know if that’s standard to take the dog to arrest to verify and check dog’s behavior. That would make sense. Better to see a problem in a controlled environment than in the heat of it. Handler did not hurt that dog. Dog/handler failed the test and hopefully they can continue the training and improve.
Another equally possible scenario is the police did this to scare that suspect. That dog has no reason to be there. Dog snapped at handler. Something like “if we feel you are a threat we will release this dog. Thing is crazy. It bites me.”
I don’t know if either situation is true, if they both are, or none. I would investigate that situation further using someone not from that force.
This was an audit, AKA training, so the dog was there to shwo how it would respond in a similar situation so they they can go back and work on different training if needed.
I am not a trainer but have had several dogs in my life. The problem I see is that it's not the dogs fault that he turned on his handler, but that there has not been enough training and or he doesn't have a good enough relationship with his handler to understand what is required of him.
He is a police officer just like the others and needs to be disinclined as such!
lmao at 'not a trainer, but have had several dogs in my life.' Being a pet owner versus a handler of a working Mal, is not the same, not even close. The Mal redirected his frustration from wanting to take on the suspect, to going for his handlers wrist. The officer 100% handled it correctly. Dog's play harder than what the officer did in his correction. Mals who are bred for this type of work, who are highly focused and have who are born to bite, is a dog you will never have a clue about, unless you have seen them worked/trained/in action. There is no off button for these dog's, they are full on, all the time.
@@MadDog_Rules& a big reason why i think CZEC working lines shouldn't of been replaced .. They are bigger but more tamed. Sure these Belgians are stupid fast & agile, smaller breed so it can fit in tighter spaces .. But nobody looked at the down sizes. Thats a 65/70lb dog .. Im only 180lbs n ik for a fact i could body that dog .. Now my CZEC working line being JUST shy of 100lbs and much more muscle, probably would drag my shoulder out of my socket if i fought him back .. Instead of that being the case w a Belgian we saw just last month one of those dogs get STRANGLED to death in a sewer .. Belgians NEED help w a grown man & adrenaline .. A GSD can & will hold its own .. Just get away w the Western working lines though, waste of time. CZEC working lines have very similar drives to Belgians. They sit lower than western lines but are a bulkier build, almost like a Pitt but bigger & stronger bite force. I have a feeling we will see alot of these videos in the next couple yrs, probably get away w them bc they are too extreme & UNPREDICTABLE. You can't have a partner like that in the field. Never have to question a GSD intentions as the handler. Ever.
@@TruGodz GSD's are notorious for having health issues and a much shorter service life.
@@MadDog_RulesI saw it as the dog being excited to get to work & like you said frustrated telling the handler to let me go and the handler did the right thing without question...
@@MadDog_Rules Western lines, yes. CZEC working lines? No. Maybe learn the lines. GSD is a breed, not all the lines have hip issues. And my first died at 18 with no hip problems at all. Just a fatty Omega 3 ontop of their kibble + natural diet. Outlast alot of dogs lol. CZEC working lines sit much shorter than Western Lines & the weight a bit less. But have a greater bite force, are faster, and typically have higher drives than western lines. I say GSD everybody thinks tan with black saddle which they hold different physical appearance & slightly different mental capability. You're going to get an overall better dog with the CZEC lines. They are more pricey (My male at an AKC breeder ran me $12,500 + protection training costs) where as you can get a so called AKC western line for $5,000, there's a reason for it. They just thought Mals could do the job better but they are EXTREME, good for military use but not civi use. U need a undeniably loyal dog. I also don't think dogs should be in service passed 8/9 years anyways. They milk the dogs for too much sometimes which will lead to those health issues as well. Why can't they enjoy the back end of their life like us humans? Instead of working like complete animals until they physically can't anymore, that's not fair.
On the way back to the vehicle the officer clearly punches the dog in its face! That isn't OK!
Note that was not mentioned. No way was that immed correction. That was ego and abuse. The cops brought the dog to intimate vs work. They know the guy by name. He’s an auditor and cop watcher…Riverside Accountability, You Tube.
@@CS-pi5oc12:04 he touches on the hit briefly.
Who would've ever guessed that the pig backs up the pig. There was absolutely no need for the dog to even be out of the car, especially if it's no more sound than this video shows.
All of those cops are there for a man with a camera and a taser. The lack of space they give the "suspect" shows how little safety concern there was. Never mind what you think of how the pig handled his dog, this whole situation was an abuse of power.
You don't know what the situation was. Judging by the calmness of the guy being arrested and the youth of the dog, the dog could've been brought out just for some low-level real-world training. He didn't handle it too well though and got corrected.
I'm not saying that that's what was going on, but simulations are not enough to prepare dogs for the real world and those dogs need to start somewhere. So it makes sense to start them on low-level situations where they may not even be needed.
@@dianadelcastillo1896be pig just wanted to see blood.
@dianadelcastillo1896 I know exactly what the situation was because I have seen the entire video, including what happened before the cops showed up.
I'm glad you point out the "calmness" of the guy being arrested for filming in public. That alone should tell you there was zero need for drawn guns and dogs.
Real world training? Would you like guns drawn and dog deployed on you, when you've broken no law? I'm pretty sure that sort of behavior would get anyone else on the planet locked up or killed in a heartbeat. But because it's the pigs doing it, it's okay? Nah. I don't think so
He wasn’t a suspect, he was a first amendment auditor conducting a protected activity that a bunch of Ken’s didn’t like so they called the police and lied about the man having a gun. There was no need to bring out the K-9 when the officers had guns trained on the individual (unlawfully) since they immediately realized it was a taser. They hyped up the contact and caused the dog to get agitated. You may not like 1st amendment auditors but lying to the police to cause a situation like this was unsafe for everyone involved. Trying to justify in unequivocal terms the actions of the officers is unfair to people who are doing something perfectly legal.
Right. The cops know him by name and know he is nvr armed but carries a personal taser ok by law. The dog was called to intimidate. There was no use for it.
👏🏻
@@CS-pi5oc right dipshit, until the day he decides NOT to carry a taser and carry a gun. But you dummies will say, "oh, he would never do that", but the police dont know that.
The guy in the black hoodie looked like a real lowlife, like a junkie thief who breaks into cars at night.
This is California & folks think it's great & want to spread it nationwide
ayy yes a comment section filled with people who havent worked a proper dog in their life and think having a fat lab what cant walk more than 2ft isnt abuse
First time I watched this clip i was pretty disgusted, but I realize I'm not an expert on working dogs.
TY for getting Stoops view as well as breaking this down, redirection is no joke
You can't claim to be objective when you call people radical.
Exactly! “Radical people criticizing an officer” - there is nothing unbiased about this video and commentary.
I agree with the cop.. but im sure zak would offer lots of hot dogs to make it better. This dog is so high drive it needs to be handles appropriately for the situation
If someone punches me in the face and I prevent them from following up with another punch by restraining the person,
am I abusing them?
I feel the dog was frustrated an as a canine officer of high intellegence he redirected that on his handler just as public dogs do on their owners which is why good balanced behaviourists are needed in this world. I didnt see any abuse there at all it needed dealing with so that team can go on an probably prevent the real violence out there.
This looked fair to me- Malinois are ''Hard'' dogs- It's not a fragile sight hound- Biting the handler is a no no.. I'm not a trainer, but it looked like the dog wanted to be let loose, and out of impatience turned round to bite the handler.
Yes but that dog clearly wasn't trained or at a certified level to be out on patrol.
so its the dogs fault? not the handler? ya that makes a whole lot of sense there genius
@@Elfin4oh come on now!!! There is no way a non-certified K9 would be allowed to deploy.
The dog messed up, which happens. And he got told by the officer that the behavior is not allowed. Period!!!
Yup this officer beat his dog.
He assaulted a officer he should be in jail
''Firm Fair and Affective''. I know this is true. My wife and I cut a very large check and bought a K-9 to replace the retiring K-9 for our Sheriff Dept. The K-9 turned into an unrecoverable biter and was retired in less than a year and sent to a year long retraining process. The ''handler'' made huge mistakes.
I used to watch demonstrations in the City of Ventura. All responded as well as Mr. Cabral's Goofy. In the various videos where the K9 was deployed the common problem was the recall. Few did it very good if at all.
Thank you for this video. My prayers for the dog and his handler.
If u people see this as animal cruelty then u really need to open up your eyes. That cop handle that perfectly because if he were my dog he would got corrected right then and there. You don’t bite mom or dad period. America is so soft anymore. This country is screwed.
You guided that whole conversation to your way of thinking. Did he hurt the dog, no! But…you never asked how could he have handled that situation better? The dog wanted to bite the guy as his reward more than he wanted to listen to commands. His reward was the bite. He needed his focus to be redirected, he was so excited he wanted him to drop the leash so he turned his aggression onto the handler.
That is poor control on a dog that is highly trained. He the handler should have been more focused on getting that dog to pay attention to him and not the suspect. He wasn’t ready to direct his attention to be a backup for the other cop. He the handler should be aware of this. Quit working on him taking down bad guys and more on listening to the command, that is the dog’s job, not attacking. Redirect that focus and you will have a great canine officer. He should have known if he couldn’t drop that leash and know the dog would listen to his handler instead of just wanting to attack then he wasn’t ready!
I think the handler lifted the dog, we can see the separation between the harness and the dog then pushes it down.
It easy to see the dog wanted to be let go by turning and tried to bite the hand that was holding him. Obviously a quick correction from the deputy. Nothin g wrong here !
If he didn't smack the K9 on the way back to the cruiser, you might have a point. But the problem was it looks like the K9 was being dragged to the first position, his front legs were off the ground by the officer, showing he wasn't cooperating in the first place. So between both of those facts, think the officer was in the wrong, k9 wasn't in the right state of mind that day and the officer took it out on the k9.
They wanted the dog to intimidate the arrested auditor and cop watcher the cops know by name. It was held back hard and grew anxious.
to start with their was no reason to let the dog out!!! it was an illegal stop. the dog is not to blame, but the fool who is the handler.
The handler was told to play games with pulling out the dog. It was to intimidate the arrested auditor and cop watcher all the cops know by name. They have arrested on trumped up charges bef. He will be let go.
It seems to me the dog was a youngster who is still training. All people who are saying it was bad are dog lovers who have pets. A K9 police dog is not a pet it’s there to do a job and at some point that means letting the dog experience stops. So all those saying the dog wasn’t needed or should have been brought out. I hope this hand,er continues to worm with dogs. We have seen. Many handlers who have no control over their police dogs. And that way people get hurt for worse than they would otherwise be.
Precisive & decisive hUman instincs vs. natUral animal instincs.
When 'natUre' calls in an automatic natUral response, for both animal and handler.
Recognition of Responsibility eqUals reward!
He corrected it just fine🎉
Looks like he was trying to gain control and correction to me
That in itself warrants an investigation. Clip doesn’t show any reason this dog would be there. If it’s a training thing that raises some questions as well.
The dog bit at the handler 3 times in the full video, had to be moved to position while holding his front feet off the ground, was over excited and distracted. I thought the dog wasn't ready to work in the field and didn't have a good working relationship with this handler. I was bothered by the alpha rollover being so kinetic and used on a dog that I thought was more fear aggressive than dominant. I thought the handler acted with anger/frustration but didn't rise to abuse at all. I don't work with tactical dogs and this is just my reaction.
I want to tell you thank you man thank you for helping me and thank you for helping a lot of other people thank you for taking your time out to watch these videos
A little knowledge is dangerous people who have never worked, trained, or understand behaviour of this or any other dog would not understand .
The officer was correct and we dont know the past crimes if any this guy has.
This was a good episode. Very interesting to watch! Keep up the good work! Greetings from Sweden!
That dog didn't have the proper training to be on a case.
The dog was trained. The handler was told to bring the K9 just to use as intimidation of the arrested auditor and cop watcher. He’s known by name to the cops. The dog grew anxious as it was held back.
Bet if a regular citizen were to do this they would be fined and dog taken away CA penal code 597 No one is above the law no excuse
Right. Did u see the officer fist punch the dog in the snout as he put it in the car? Plus the dog was anxious and being held back. The cops know the guy they arrested. He’s a cop watcher and auditor. They were going to cuff him then set the dog on him. Riverside Accountability on You tube.
It's fine. People are too soft for their own good and throw out common sense; these people should foster dogs and puppies to see how rough they are to each other while playing (puppies especially, you will be shocked). This dog probably didn't think anything of the correction a few seconds later.
abuse is not ever the proper correction......cop lost his patience pure and simple and should not be handling any animals
Said the dog abuser
@robin212212 I guarantee that Maligator was already over it by the time it was back at the dog of the unit 🤣. The irony is these bleeding hearts on here are ones destroying breeds like the Malinois by anthropomorphizing them and making them ugly Christmas sweaters.
All these people that feel bad don't correct their pets or kids and wonder why there is misbehavior.
Weird how they feel comfortable correcting officers with 4 legs but never officers with 2.
I knew a dog handler for the PA state police and his dogs were his life. He was also a kind and gentle fella and the dogs clearly saw him this way. Dogs are the best judge of character.
I got a 1 year old GSD/Husky mix, I already had a GSD/Aussie mix who was 10 at the time. Over the last year I have seen her correct him more harshly than that officer corrected his animal.
😂 No you haven’t.
Good job on explaining. The first time I saw it on utube I thought it was rough. The second time, I didn't see abuse. Thanks for this.
Which part of this was “objective”?
I get why people would be upset but that is bc the public does not know what it takes to handle a dog of that level. It’s like a boxing fan giving opinion on Mike Tyson’s training methods. That simply doesn’t not understand the world that they’re commenting on.
The handler fist punched the dog in the snout on the way back to the car. Both r ill trained.
Ye three guns and a dog for a 9 stone guy with a camera
Robert those of us who know already know and the rest of the people will never be convinced
Bruce Lee said something about only correcting a wise man who appreciates it, coz the foolish man will not be corrected due to his foolishness