Samsung's New Graphene Battery

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @digitalproductions4758
    @digitalproductions4758 7 років тому +532

    Some of the best, most well produced, informative content on UA-cam. Thanks Dagogo!

    • @anamositykilla2190
      @anamositykilla2190 7 років тому +2

      Smitty Jagerman RIGHT

    • @iihh517
      @iihh517 7 років тому

      It would be great if you could help the UA-cam community and report channels that are stealing your vids because those channels steal other people's vids too. It sucks that you don't seem to care people reuploading your work.

    • @chrishill2435
      @chrishill2435 7 років тому

      Smitty Jagerman lol what a clown

    • @ryun_d3v
      @ryun_d3v 7 років тому

      Yes.

    • @Max_Jacoby
      @Max_Jacoby 5 років тому +1

      My first dislike to ColdFusion for desinformation about diamond structure. He doesn't even go to wikipedia before making video. What quality are you talking about?

  • @Sacchidanand
    @Sacchidanand 7 років тому +709

    Finally it's here : most awaited Graphene.

    • @tautvydaspetkunas
      @tautvydaspetkunas 7 років тому +20

      Graphene is attracting attention for sure but it's probably still years away until we see it mass produced products(like smartphones).

    • @Xibyth
      @Xibyth 7 років тому +5

      Tautvydas Petkūnas Primarily due to the issue of lattice typing graphing. Popcorn only improves current methods but still can replace due to density issues.

    • @jmpcrx
      @jmpcrx 7 років тому +40

      I remember just dreaming as a kid about having an actual colour screen on hand held console, now look at where we are. If they crack graphene, things will leap forward again..

    • @luisantos1996
      @luisantos1996 7 років тому

      Tautvydas Petkūnas I think that Will be son that you expect, at least i hope.

    • @ilsunnylo3562
      @ilsunnylo3562 7 років тому +3

      Samsung electric cars soon.

  • @AliKhundmiri
    @AliKhundmiri 7 років тому +342

    Amazing A book from Coldfusion!
    You know what will be better? An Audio Book. Would love to hear that crispy voice narrating the history of science.!

    • @harsh.thakkar
      @harsh.thakkar 7 років тому +14

      Ali Khundmiri absolutely !!!

    • @tuanoful
      @tuanoful 7 років тому +8

      Upvoting you to the sky

    • @SkillWill22
      @SkillWill22 7 років тому +1

      His voice is heavily enhanced, you can clearly hear that. I personaly don't like the overboosted bass :/

    • @James-616
      @James-616 7 років тому +1

      SkillWill
      That’s probably just the mic he uses

    • @tuanoful
      @tuanoful 7 років тому

      Well... we do, that's why we upvote.

  • @ir4kk
    @ir4kk 7 років тому +375

    Apples just going to wait until its JUST ABOUT mainstream then buy the technology make a small tweak, add an apple logo, then say they came up with this new revolutionary technology

    • @eplugplay8409
      @eplugplay8409 6 років тому +5

      ir4kk just because a company does it first does not mean it’s always the best version.There will always be a better version. It’s good though, it means the consumer wins since we have more and better options.

    • @ouroboros2285
      @ouroboros2285 6 років тому +8

      Apple already openly buys Samsung Technologies lol. Most of Samsungs profits actually come from selling TVs and these screens. There's a reason why Google and Apple are paying LG to come up with their own screens to try and oust Samsung.

    • @ameyas7726
      @ameyas7726 5 років тому +16

      Well at least Apple will buy the technology...Huawei will steal the technology, make a small tweak, add Huawei logo and sell the phone for half the price..

    • @possessorofgreatness7620
      @possessorofgreatness7620 5 років тому

      @@afa1515 the fastest charging in an 'iPhone'

    • @zoroxtreme867
      @zoroxtreme867 5 років тому +1

      They gonna wait about 6 years or more than

  • @daytonglitch
    @daytonglitch 6 років тому +113

    If scientists were willing to collaborate with the people who make public bathroom toilet paper we could finally have an efficient way to make graphene batteries

    • @angelicpowers3526
      @angelicpowers3526 5 років тому

      Body panels for sports cars with steal frams for wieght to power ratio

  • @Xxp0r
    @Xxp0r 7 років тому +154

    I am so happy that battery development is such a huge priority now. I cannot wait for electric cars to be mainstream and have a cleaner greener future!

    • @theironhunter1423
      @theironhunter1423 7 років тому +6

      Xk. Electric cars are still a long ways away from going mainstream. Electric cars arent nearly as safe because they are so light and offer far less crumple zone. They are lighter and therefore get no traction in mud, ice, or water puddles. Since they are so light they dont do well with lots of bumps aka a dirt road. Batteries and their range of miles arent the only hurdles left. Electric cars arent ready for winter environments or rural environments where you need power and traction sometimes.

    • @urgandma
      @urgandma 7 років тому +26

      TheIronHunter light? The model S is like 4500 pounds, the model 3 is 3500. They weigh a good amount more than the cars they are competing with.

    • @sentenced7259
      @sentenced7259 7 років тому +28

      TheIronHunter You have no idea what you're talking about...

    • @marvinwum7239
      @marvinwum7239 7 років тому +17

      Electric cars wont make a clean future unless we finaly develop a new clean source of energy. Right now those cars basically run on coal, oil etc.

    • @BleedForTheWorld
      @BleedForTheWorld 7 років тому

      I don't. V12 N/A > V10 > V8 > Everything else > Electric vehicles. We don't need electric sports cars when everything else is still powered by fossil fuels.

  • @nigel0001
    @nigel0001 7 років тому +348

    Samsung again pushing the boundaries. Hello Apple?

    • @tuanoful
      @tuanoful 7 років тому +159

      Apple is also pushing the boundaries, what are you talking about?
      They are pushing the boundaries of pricing, and somehow, they haven't reached it yet.

    • @nigel0001
      @nigel0001 7 років тому +74

      JustThaor - Apple generally tweak ideas other companies put out and pretend that those ideas are they're own.

    • @John_C_J
      @John_C_J 7 років тому +46

      Probably iPhone 17 will get those graphene ones when Apple have to buy from Samsung.

    • @ibrahimahmad3917
      @ibrahimahmad3917 7 років тому

      John C John I agree

    • @DJaquithFL
      @DJaquithFL 7 років тому +5

      LMAO! Apple is going to use solid-state Li-ion batteries. Samsung's graphene is already outdated .. sorry. cen.acs.org/articles/95/i46/Solid-state-batteries-inch-way.html

  • @CKTDanny
    @CKTDanny 7 років тому +767

    Graphene is the future!

    • @rethinking3289
      @rethinking3289 7 років тому

      SDG Danny If you want to know why the hexagon shape
      Watch this.
      ua-cam.com/video/CZbB_mQlHPo/v-deo.html

    • @RAZR_Channel
      @RAZR_Channel 7 років тому +5

      The book you've been working on. You might consider turning it into a Movie/UA-cam Video : with a major sponsor injected into the video a few times. People like me are lazy to read and like to watch video which is why we are here on UA-cam.

    • @Felisargyle
      @Felisargyle 7 років тому

      Let me just get my pull out my bitcoin wallet

    • @Psittac20
      @Psittac20 7 років тому

      piggy back on popular comment: @ColdFusion can you look in to this topic: Returning to the moon for Helium 3 to power nuclear reactors and the use of hydrogen fuel cells as a conduit? Relatively cheap energy with a proper conduit.

    • @Black-Re4per
      @Black-Re4per 7 років тому +1

      ReThinking Fuck off with your Bullshit

  • @aamirtanoli4084
    @aamirtanoli4084 4 роки тому +38

    So two years passed since Samsung announced it and still no sign of graphene powered smartphones.

    • @ErikAmerica100
      @ErikAmerica100 4 роки тому

      If I am not wrong the one who set up the technology's owns it for 20 years... I mean they have the exclusivity for that time. There’s no hurry!

    • @IceBiiRd
      @IceBiiRd 4 роки тому +1

      Real Graphene USA company stated, “Expect them in 2021”

    • @NoahSpurrier
      @NoahSpurrier 4 роки тому +2

      @@IceBiiRd which translates to "maybe 2021, maybe never".

    • @doomtomb3
      @doomtomb3 4 роки тому

      Ericamerica Americo 20 yrs = patent lifetime

    • @bloepje
      @bloepje 4 роки тому +1

      Why would they use it for smartphones? They have so many other divisions that need better batteries. Samsung SDI has been a big provider for EV car batteries for a long time. But Samsung Heavy Industries also might better batteries. If it comes to the phone, it's because that tiny department can sell it as a gimmick. And Samsung SDI has no problems selling the batteries to Apple first.

  • @yatinsinha6796
    @yatinsinha6796 7 років тому +384

    Samsung creates. Apple buys.

    • @hamoudhabibi1996
      @hamoudhabibi1996 6 років тому +15

      Yatin Sinha steals*

    • @ian-cl4pv
      @ian-cl4pv 6 років тому +1

      name surname no apple buys.

    • @jaydeep-p
      @jaydeep-p 6 років тому +1

      apple sells too

    • @worthlessguy7477
      @worthlessguy7477 6 років тому +3

      Apple pays and take but Samsung straight away copies

    • @MrMkx007
      @MrMkx007 6 років тому +3

      Apple used Samsung batteries in 2014, since then they use Lishen and CATL technology.

  • @mayurarun
    @mayurarun 7 років тому +193

    Samsung is innovative

    • @Colaglass
      @Colaglass 7 років тому +1

      The last of the big bunch.

    • @JartaYT
      @JartaYT 7 років тому +2

      A plant The big bunch? Explain please.

    • @abyssstrider2547
      @abyssstrider2547 7 років тому +18

      Mayur Arun unlike apple which just steals old tech and calls it "innovation", wonder how will they pass this as something new for the market? While Samsung will use it for probably a couple of years

    • @nikoolay
      @nikoolay 7 років тому +17

      Jarta long story short back in the day when someone heard innovation they immediately thought of intel apple sonny and even the PlayStation. But now these companies are just getting greedier and they stopped innovating that means taking risks and spending money for exaple i9 the new cpu it's nothing new, the same design of the iphone and the lack of cd players and everything(sony). And now the only inovators left are amd with the new ryzon(i think it was) chip set, samsung's infinity screen which has the amuled screen, the note series and the battery.

    • @jonnathan780
      @jonnathan780 7 років тому +1

      nikoolay raykov can you spell properly please.

  • @TechKerala
    @TechKerala 7 років тому +1544

    While Samsung is already working on Graphene batteries apple is working on new emojis.
    Progress by "think different", because who does not need new emojis?

    • @TheTororist
      @TheTororist 7 років тому +161

      TechKErala they'll just contract samsung, slap an Apple logo on it and charge double. Easy, shareholders happy

    • @JamieLannyster
      @JamieLannyster 7 років тому +65

      well, samsung does build nuclear powerplants and is basically south korea's GDP. different to compare the two.

    • @0786ahsan
      @0786ahsan 7 років тому +3

      TechKErala iix

    • @ily9565
      @ily9565 7 років тому +18

      yeah i completely agree,
      emojis are something i need in my life definately no question

    • @JackieWelles
      @JackieWelles 7 років тому +23

      Kiprotich Toroitich and then call "their" batteries to be better than anyone else has it lol

  • @DashwoodIce9
    @DashwoodIce9 7 років тому +123

    Graphene is a single atom thick layer of graphite, not diamond! In diamond the carbon atoms are arranged in a tetrahedral shape whereas in graphite they are arranged in hexagonal layers which have weak van der waals forces holding them together.

    • @FourTwentyMagic
      @FourTwentyMagic 7 років тому +20

      I was looking through the comments trying to find someone else who noticed.

    • @rainmind
      @rainmind 7 років тому +13

      Thank God there are two nerds in the comments. I now learned something new.

    • @iskander396
      @iskander396 7 років тому +39

      Actually he only mentioned diamond as an exmaple for the simpletons and the non nerds to understand how the technology is in a 'macroscopic' level xd

    • @jaysanchez4407
      @jaysanchez4407 7 років тому +10

      He used that as an example 😂

    • @Skinnymarks
      @Skinnymarks 7 років тому +7

      You might need to brush up on your English comprehension.

  • @dacealksne
    @dacealksne 3 роки тому +4

    3 years later... Where are your magical batteries?

  • @worldshell2313
    @worldshell2313 5 років тому +50

    Lighter than air? What comes in my mind is Airplane or Drone based from graphene combined with solar cell to charge it in day light

    • @rxonmymind8362
      @rxonmymind8362 5 років тому +1

      A tether to space my friend or solar sails the size of football fields that are only couple GRAMS in weight. Boom. Mind blowing stuff.

    • @benl8962
      @benl8962 5 років тому +2

      If a drone is too light it will just get swept away by the tiniest breeze

    • @mesoanto1031
      @mesoanto1031 4 роки тому +1

      You just described the fundaments of solar nano tubes

    • @kshitishsorte2918
      @kshitishsorte2918 4 роки тому

      Omg infinite energy 😂😂

    • @ninjapancakes9435
      @ninjapancakes9435 4 роки тому

      If it's lighter than air then it should be floating like a hydrogen balloon. 🤦

  • @David_Me825
    @David_Me825 7 років тому +803

    Dude where have you been so long??

    • @David_Me825
      @David_Me825 7 років тому +14

      i didnt watched the video when i commented.

    • @ashfaqrahman2795
      @ashfaqrahman2795 7 років тому +36

      He is a masked vigilante. He barely finds time for this.

    • @David_Me825
      @David_Me825 7 років тому +5

      Ashfaq Ur Rahman N
      you made my day bro!

    • @YumYumRecords
      @YumYumRecords 7 років тому +3

      Deividas Melnikas Shtaufer he's waiting for a sponsor for more money

    • @wayge
      @wayge 7 років тому +2

      Play Memoriex if that were the case going inactive wouldnt help

  • @masteroogway2
    @masteroogway2 7 років тому +51

    One of the most informative UA-cam channel 👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌

  • @lordvoldemort917
    @lordvoldemort917 7 років тому +62

    its not diamond but Graphite 2:20
    diamond has a tetrahedral geometry but graphite is basically layers of graphene held by wan der waals forces

    • @xXETouXx
      @xXETouXx 6 років тому +5

      thank you! I tought I was crazy

    • @markiangooley
      @markiangooley 6 років тому +4

      Exactly right. There’s a big difference between diamond and graphite. Graphite is fascinating stuff and graphene may be stunningly useful, but it’s aromatic-style bonds...

    • @alecheesacker9426
      @alecheesacker9426 6 років тому

      What? Is it “you’re my wan der waal”?

  • @garrettlosabia3818
    @garrettlosabia3818 7 років тому +2

    I've been subscribed to your channel since

  • @DarrylBass
    @DarrylBass 7 років тому +676

    Meanwhile Apple has animated emojis 💩💩💩

    • @RWBHere
      @RWBHere 7 років тому +44

      They've lost their direction ever since Jobs died. Some of their best products at reasonable prices came about because of his influence, whether you like him or not. That creepy Smith character is mainly management, not innovator, and the whole company is treading water again, just as it did before Jobs returned to rescue them.

    • @DarrylBass
      @DarrylBass 7 років тому +50

      RWBHere Jobs was never the genius people give him credit for. Steve Wozniak was the real genius, he was the creator and inventor of the products that put Apple on the map.
      Jobs was just good at stealing other people's ideas and taking credit for it (read about how he stole from Wozniak and cheated him out of money)
      If he was alive today, he would be doing what he did before he died which is cry like a baby because of competition and steal ideas.

    • @m3ntalx09
      @m3ntalx09 7 років тому +24

      Darryl Bass I agree that people are giving Jobs way too much credit. Jobs wasn't an innovator, he was a businessman. Taking credit for other people's work. However, as any good businessman, he knew and had foresight on what will help his company grow. He understood the market. The final decision still came from Jobs. In a business aspect, he was a master at it.

    • @kiranmaharjan619
      @kiranmaharjan619 7 років тому

      Darryl Bass lol

    • @theolydersen3544
      @theolydersen3544 6 років тому

      Darryl Bass that's funny😂😂👌

  • @ZepicZboy
    @ZepicZboy 7 років тому +34

    Great video but just a minor detail, graphene is not like taking a one atom thick slice of diamond. Each carbon atom in a diamond crystal is connected to 4 other carbon atoms whereas in graphene it is only 3 other carbon atoms. They are fundamentally different ways of organizing the carbon atoms each with their own electrical and mechanical properties.

    • @jaysanchez4407
      @jaysanchez4407 7 років тому +7

      DavidW you know he used that as an example right? As a lamens way of explaining it

    • @alexzanderlou
      @alexzanderlou 7 років тому +5

      It was a simple way of explaining it

    • @TheSmileyFacedPizza
      @TheSmileyFacedPizza 7 років тому +3

      Spreading misinformation is never a good thing. If you feel like you have to make stuff up to inform, either you aren't yet adept enough at the subject to teach it, or you're targeting the wrong audience.

    • @MrZootSuitz
      @MrZootSuitz 7 років тому +2

      Also the carbon allotropes Samsung produces aren't graphene

    • @gabrielskidmore1042
      @gabrielskidmore1042 7 років тому

      I was just about to say that but you beat me to it, nice.

  • @IamJay
    @IamJay 7 років тому +277

    I'm hitting the like button before watching the whole video.

    • @paying-for-free-speech
      @paying-for-free-speech 7 років тому +7

      FRANTIC I hit like as soon as I heard him say hi 😅 the videos are always very informative and high quality.

    • @simontjuh64
      @simontjuh64 7 років тому +5

      Yes always such quality content.

    • @garret1317
      @garret1317 7 років тому +2

      i like the way he says hi

    • @timtam8771
      @timtam8771 7 років тому +2

      Or.., you could afford the man the respect of listening to what he has to say before fawning all over him.
      Sheeple.

    • @simontjuh64
      @simontjuh64 7 років тому +2

      Tim Tam Stfu we have faith

  • @zeromailss
    @zeromailss 7 років тому +410

    I envy people of the future
    Imagine a light, slim but powerful laptop that could play any game with battery that last for days
    Damn

    • @tudorobretin4705
      @tudorobretin4705 7 років тому +62

      MeowAlien にゃあエイリアン I think that’s just scratching the surface

    • @zlac
      @zlac 7 років тому +13

      MeowAlien にゃあエイリアン Ain't gonna happen, the power density would be more than TNT and very dangerous.
      Charge speed coyld increase 10x or even 100x, but capacity? Even 2x is very optimistic.

    • @dunhillsupramk3
      @dunhillsupramk3 7 років тому +24

      nah by then VR will be a thing.. like total recall VR..

    • @abdalrhmannegm6227
      @abdalrhmannegm6227 7 років тому +13

      zlac you don't need more than 2x more dense. electronics get more efficient just look at what current batteries can do

    • @breastmilkgaming
      @breastmilkgaming 7 років тому +11

      MeowAlien にゃあエイリアン but people will still buy Apple

  • @Oxron206
    @Oxron206 5 років тому +4

    Samsung is freakin amazing. They go above and beyond and try alot of things that others are afraid of or arent ready. Samsung just dives right in with things

  • @claudegarmon2958
    @claudegarmon2958 6 років тому

    great show. i was just about to share it on facebook when the imbedded ad for square space started; it wasn't long before i knew i wasn't going to share something with such a vigorous ad, but it was a while after that, even, before the advertising was finally over. feedback concerning magnitude and duration of advertising amplification. once again, excellent, professional show.

  • @parthvaghjiyani9101
    @parthvaghjiyani9101 7 років тому +20

    As samsung you are also very dedicated to your work...

  • @sadochrist8534
    @sadochrist8534 7 років тому +9

    One of the best things about the electric future is that it'll be quiet, I wonder how that will impact on peoples psychology, maybe make people a bit more peaceful.

  • @BanditRants
    @BanditRants 7 років тому +334

    New ColdFusion vid? Immediately stopped editing my video to watch.

  • @harryjones7197
    @harryjones7197 7 років тому

    glad to hear you are writing a book - I will grab a copy when it comes out !! good work

  • @nxcts20
    @nxcts20 7 років тому

    Studied the idea of graphene batteries a few years ago. Glad to see progress!

  • @techpassion4126
    @techpassion4126 7 років тому +30

    Very interesting, keep it up Dagogo! On a side note, so glad to hear you're getting sponsors like Squarespace now! You do wonderful work, so I'm glad you're getting some income for it ^^

  • @sammottershead
    @sammottershead 7 років тому +6

    Song at the start: above and beyond Tri-state (5vel remix)

  • @tylerian4648
    @tylerian4648 7 років тому +62

    video starts at 2:10

  • @marcusnilsson5519
    @marcusnilsson5519 7 років тому

    Your book will be in my bookshelf as soon as you publish it, for sure. Great and informative videos!

  • @MohitShelke
    @MohitShelke 7 років тому

    Totally waiting for your book, great video, keep us updated on such significant developments in battery tech.

  • @Vic4ful
    @Vic4ful 7 років тому +5

    I miss you man, your videos are so interesting and I use them to understand the trends that are affecting the markets

  • @David_Me825
    @David_Me825 7 років тому +387

    Apple has the money for researching new technologies, but they just better keep it for themselves

    • @kornelhaduch8183
      @kornelhaduch8183 7 років тому +87

      Apple just takes the technology from others ;p

    • @anamositykilla2190
      @anamositykilla2190 7 років тому +49

      Deividas Melnikas Shtaufer That's good! That's APPLES downfall! Let Samsung Be the truly innovative smart phone manufacturer!

    • @adriancooper78
      @adriancooper78 7 років тому +11

      Deividas Melnikas Shtaufer Remember: Samsung is a Global multi-conglomerate, they can pool from it's other industries. Apple is alright getting tech from them (Liquid Crystal Screens) for their next generation phones.

    • @KimasM
      @KimasM 7 років тому +50

      Apples research department is basically people who find the ways to steal other ideas in to there own company.

    • @makdavian3567
      @makdavian3567 7 років тому +1

      Deividas Melnikas Shtaufer
      Oh yeah, let’s get on that Apple hate bandwagon. You got any source there bud? smh

  • @atombaxter1975
    @atombaxter1975 7 років тому +11

    I want that book!!!!

  • @Blvo1
    @Blvo1 7 років тому +203

    Samsung mean real innovation. They don't bluff like apple.

    • @nicko9799
      @nicko9799 7 років тому

      Vasu Sharma cough cough note 7

    • @its3dnow524
      @its3dnow524 7 років тому +25

      Nick Eddy at least they don't make shit phones like apple cough cough. Dumbass fanboys

    • @dominicg2456
      @dominicg2456 7 років тому +33

      Nick Eddy that only affected 100 phones, samsung actually owned up to it and recalled all of them. Apple has shady business tactics, such as planned obsolescence, and not mentioning the expanding iPhone 8 batteries, or the extremely closed firmware.

    • @direfulkn1f337
      @direfulkn1f337 6 років тому +15

      I bet if one of the iphones blew up. Apple wont take the phones back but would charge the owners of the phone for the phone again.

    • @purpletomato5535
      @purpletomato5535 6 років тому +1

      Its3dNOW says the android fanboy

  • @mr.darknight416
    @mr.darknight416 6 років тому +2

    As always a great video, this is my favorite channel, its relaxing, exiting and informative, especially when i am studying science in high school and we are studying different isotopes of carbon and this vid helps. Thx

  • @Twyzan
    @Twyzan 7 років тому +176

    Diamond has a tetrahedral structure, graphene isn’t a slice of diamond, it’s a slice of graphite (pencil lead). Come on Dagogo, should’ve concentrated in chemistry class.

    • @RWBHere
      @RWBHere 7 років тому +10

      Pencil lead is graphite with a lot of clay in it.

    • @groszak1
      @groszak1 7 років тому +19

      graphene is a slice of graphene

    • @ramade9040
      @ramade9040 7 років тому +41

      They are all same at atomic level.. dont be racist..

    • @hanro50
      @hanro50 6 років тому +38

      The chemical structure of diamonds and graphite is radically different. In diamond each carbon atom bonds to 4 other carbon atoms and thus there is no free electrons and diamond becomes thus a insulator.
      In graphite most carbon atoms only bond to 3 other carbon atoms. This gives it a free electron which allows it to conduct electricity.
      Fun fact: If you draw a thick enough line with a pencil; you can actually use it to conduct electricity.

    • @LegoDork
      @LegoDork 6 років тому +7

      They also managed to synthesize a pure carbon structure out of SiO2 somehow. Samsung must have found the philosophers stone.

  • @yangerek78
    @yangerek78 7 років тому +6

    That is why i have lots of respect and quite eager for any new Samsung devices. They may price it a little more than other ie. Huawei and other China based tech company, at least they spend it on R&D and so on and as a consumer its a positive step ahead

  • @Redrumm
    @Redrumm 3 роки тому +3

    Where is this battery at?? Figured it would be in samsung flagship by now

  • @WarriorsPhoto
    @WarriorsPhoto 7 років тому

    Glad to see you are making progress Dagogo. I am excited for your book. Keep up the good works.

  • @abusufian6563
    @abusufian6563 6 років тому +1

    I kinda binge watch your uploads dude! :) Thanks for the hardwork.

  • @funny-video-YouTube-channel
    @funny-video-YouTube-channel 6 років тому +55

    *Wonderful technology* that will make life more easy for all of us.
    Let's hope it will end the age of air pollution from petrol transportation.
    Charging the phone 5X faster would be nice, even if the capacity is the same. Having cleaner air in the city is a real win with such advanced technology that can be used in electric cars, aircraft, ships, trains, power stations, and buses too :-)
    Thx to the brave engineers who figure things out for all of us !

    • @AlexanderKG
      @AlexanderKG 6 років тому +3

      epSos.de I don't think you see the problem here. With graphene it's more efficient but we still need a good enough cable that can pump out that much energy into the graphene battery itself.

    • @dimitardimitrov9482
      @dimitardimitrov9482 6 років тому +5

      CaptainAKG But what if the cable itself is made of graphene. As I understand graphene is a superconductor and scientist are working on how to make graphene conductors that are cheap enought to mass produce. Imagine how many pound a vehichle will shed if all the cables are replaced with graphene based conductors. Pardon my English, it ain't my first language. Cheers!
      P.S. forgot to mention that graphene has 1000x the current conduction potential of copper so surely u can charge a battery in a few seconds if the battery can handle it. Imagine an EV that can charge in less time it takes to pump fuel in F1 race car.

    • @AlexanderKG
      @AlexanderKG 6 років тому

      JIM Dimitrov It's a bit harder to make a cable like that and might take a little bit more research but it's doable. Regarding mass producing graphene, there is already a pretty cheap way of mass producing graphene (I forgot how). I think the University of Pennsylvania figured it out 4 years ago (which I think was kinda unreliable) but this whole thing started booming up a year ago so if you search Graphene Mass Production on Google or something, there's gonna be tons of results from like 1-2 years ago.

    • @craigglewis
      @craigglewis 6 років тому

      I will do better :) "SuperCell - Powering the Mobile World"
      What is the biggest issue with mobile devices like cell phones and Tablets? Keeping them charged
      What if you never had to recharge your mobile device again or get a week out of your device.
      Well with the "Supercell - Powering the Mobile World" you will never have to worry about your device power again.
      I have the concept, I have the technology, now we need to design the prototype and Power the Mobile World :)
      Will you join me in Powering the Billions of mobile devices now in the hands of Billions around the World?
      I have Applied to have the Experts to assist with this Project.
      www.launchboom.com
      Looking to raise $100K so we can develop the Prototype and start manufacturing the first SuperCells.
      Cool
      Confirmed
      You are scheduled with Brad Enright.
      30 Minute Meeting
      03:30pm - Tuesday, September 18, 2018
      facebook.com/craigglewis1/posts/2072867186078367

    • @tsamuel6224
      @tsamuel6224 6 років тому

      Paradoxical Nightmare - Copper doesn't bend all that well well either, you get metal fatigue. So highly flexible copper &/or graphene cables are about equally difficult, and copper's been done. I've held copper cables an inch thick that bent like a noodle. Graphene will simply take time.

  • @Food4thought1234
    @Food4thought1234 7 років тому +69

    Thank you Samsung...

    • @giovannisantos2539
      @giovannisantos2539 7 років тому +6

      Richard Andrews samsung for Life

    • @lazerbeastgamer355hd7
      @lazerbeastgamer355hd7 7 років тому +4

      Apple will probably copy it and make it sound new in 3 years smh

    • @amdusa77
      @amdusa77 7 років тому +1

      Apple never ever had developed a battery, so your comment is irrelevant.

    • @lazerbeastgamer355hd7
      @lazerbeastgamer355hd7 7 років тому +1

      Tech4tech what It meant to say is they will take the battery technology from Samsung and put it in their phones

  • @Alex632
    @Alex632 7 років тому +25

    I don't care about charging faster. I want a battery that holds its juice.

    • @Methylglyoxal
      @Methylglyoxal 7 років тому +2

      you want a lot

    • @Ninjasinparis-q4p
      @Ninjasinparis-q4p 7 років тому +1

      Lithium ion batteries does it. Try using alkaline batteries in your phone if there’s one, and see the huge difference.

    • @tuanoful
      @tuanoful 7 років тому +1

      Like over years? Phones nowadays do a full day. Now imagine with 45% more capacity and 15 minute charge. That would be amazing.

    • @soleil3gs
      @soleil3gs 7 років тому

      yo Alex And take 3 days to charge...idiot

    • @johnnycatR58
      @johnnycatR58 7 років тому

      yo Alex why don't we have both?

  • @amamihechukwunnodum839
    @amamihechukwunnodum839 7 років тому

    You have some of the best content in modern and historical science and technology review. No joke👌

  • @ZaiFuchigami
    @ZaiFuchigami 7 років тому +2

    This is the greatest channel on UA-cam!!!! Awesome work my friend!

  • @karrade2000
    @karrade2000 7 років тому +31

    CVD is not a new technique, it might be new to use it for Graphene, but I doubt it. Further the paper was published in nature communications judging from your images not in nature it self, which is quite a bit of a difference. Finally, before they actually have proven that it is mass produceable this is to my eyes just another new battery technology that is in theory better then current li-ion technology but will have a very hard time to compete with it in terms of price and manufactureability. Anyway, great content.

    • @karrade2000
      @karrade2000 7 років тому +9

      at 5:30: "…because Samsung is using a _new_ method called chemical vapor disposition. Quote…"

    • @PouncingAnt
      @PouncingAnt 7 років тому

      I'm with Florian here. "Rigorous testing" by scientists doesn't mean a product is commercially viable. It looks promising, and I hope it, or something like it, comes to fruition, but when a scientist says "inexpensive" they are still very often talking orders of magnitude different from what we consider in everyday life. Taking the video at face value, there isn't much we can take away except for scientific interest.
      Then again, I'm mostly here just for the science anyway, and ColdFusion is pretty good at highlighting interesting new tech. In that respect, it was a cool video

  • @kemarkcooper286
    @kemarkcooper286 7 років тому +15

    Still not completely graphene.. But it is a step forward

    • @1AxK9
      @1AxK9 7 років тому +6

      Well they won't directly kill a multi billion dollar lithium ion battery industry, would they?
      companies around the world, including Samsung have invested billions on Lithium ion battery production.
      They will innovate around the base technology and milk it as much as they possibly can, and then move on, sooner or later.

    • @kshitijjhalak1939
      @kshitijjhalak1939 7 років тому +8

      What are you talking about ? a battery has 2 electrodes and an electrolyte. If you make everything out of Graphene, there would zero potential across the electrodes. No current will flow.
      Go back to school and learn how batteries, schmucks.

    • @SubinGeorge26
      @SubinGeorge26 7 років тому +5

      Do you know the meaning of Graphene "based"? Obviously not 100% of it is Graphene. Even Li-Ion is not 100% made of the same material. What an Idiot

    • @1AxK9
      @1AxK9 7 років тому

      Well actually it's ready but it's primitive right now, similar to very early solar panels.

    • @1AxK9
      @1AxK9 7 років тому

      Super capacitors based on Graphene, that is.
      (Obviously not pure Graphene, duh)

  • @Donthaveacowbra
    @Donthaveacowbra 7 років тому +30

    I'm. Skeptical to say the least, but hopeful.

  • @ernestol.guerraa.4040
    @ernestol.guerraa.4040 4 роки тому +1

    Hi mate can you please give an update on Graphene current developments? thanks for all you do on keep in us updated

  • @michaelpoisson320
    @michaelpoisson320 3 роки тому

    So encouraging, love your channel!

  • @ryvyr
    @ryvyr 7 років тому +25

    It requires effort to contain my jubilation and optimism on a broad scale going forward, with so much innovation saving lives and pushing the envelope of science and technology beyond what, I think, most realize - even as the world continues to spin and apathetic leaders rise and fall, the denizens of the world press on for a brighter future ^^;

    • @Statsy10
      @Statsy10 7 років тому +2

      Until the robot uprising, of course! ;)

    • @justinthematrix
      @justinthematrix 6 років тому

      Put the thesaurus down kid your comment makes no sense.

    • @ryvyr
      @ryvyr 6 років тому

      Jeff Brailsford It depends on the circumstances - depending, one might welcome robot overlords ;p Then again... robots built by machines built by humans... I suppose it could be quite unpleasant, bearing in mind the layers of assumptions in such speculation ;0
      Justin Shaw What is your foundation for assertion? Is 'kid' supposed to be 'cool?' This is how I think and communicate /shrug

  • @ultravidz
    @ultravidz 7 років тому +106

    Increasing energy capacity + charging speed definitely makes batteries more dangerous. I expect that Samsung will go above and beyond in testing these, so it’ll take time before we see them.

    • @bradu93
      @bradu93 7 років тому +22

      yeah, it's not like they ever released exploding batteries before

    • @dennisp8520
      @dennisp8520 7 років тому +1

      I agree and I hope they do. I personally think that lithium ion batteries are fine. Sure they are old tech; however, they are good enough for most people. I have never found myself not having enough battery at the end of my day and I'm a power user.

    • @ultravidz
      @ultravidz 7 років тому +21

      Radusaurus That's what I was eluding to. Samsung won't be repeating that mistake.

    • @ultravidz
      @ultravidz 7 років тому +12

      Dennis Pietrandrea I sort of agree, but having your battery last the full day isn't the ideal goal. Why not strive for 1 week.. like those old Nokia phones? Having better batteries also enables more powerful hardware and features. Like fully realizing AR, VR, AI, machine learning, etc. all on a device that fits in your pocket without having to rely on supercomputers in the cloud and sharing all your data with them. Other technologies will benefit too. I'd like my laptop to have a 48 hour battery life. And it would also be nice to have an electric car that can traverse several states on a single charge. It just comes down to reliability and never worrying about your electronics dying as much, especially when you need them most.

    • @tbvjqor123
      @tbvjqor123 7 років тому +8

      Radusaurus Samsung outsourced those batteries that were on the Note 7. Yes its Samsungs fault for outsourcing batteries from cheap chinese manufacturers.

  • @zdcraft0711
    @zdcraft0711 7 років тому +8

    Well, let's hope this one doesent explode.

    • @hihaveaniceday9386
      @hihaveaniceday9386 7 років тому +3

      zain alsaif or swell like the iPhone 8

    • @nothx56g
      @nothx56g 7 років тому +2

      why would it explode? it's not an arab like you

    • @zdcraft0711
      @zdcraft0711 7 років тому

      Bogdan lmaooooo bruh why the racism fam, I mean I respect the roast but couldn't u find a different place to like atak ppl, ye get me? Like let me watch dis vid bout phone batteries in peace bru

    • @user-lc8ot3em6j
      @user-lc8ot3em6j 7 років тому +1

      zain alsaif the reasons explosion was Chinese battery not by SAMSUNG SDI batteries. And your joke is very old like you. And after not using Chinese company's barter they do not exploded. So dont talk like that.

  • @kennethtape3362
    @kennethtape3362 7 років тому

    As usual, edifying as ever. Way to go mate :)

  • @dcdales
    @dcdales 7 років тому

    Lemme (or us?) know when you've published a book. I'd buy a copy. Partly because I want to support you making these videos, but also partly because I bet you'd make an amazing book, with all the ideas you spend so much time with. Awesome.

  • @tonymichael7266
    @tonymichael7266 7 років тому +23

    Please Make a Video on How Big is
    Honda
    Microsoft

    • @MadOrange644
      @MadOrange644 7 років тому

      My dick is bigger

    • @wertywerty6
      @wertywerty6 7 років тому +1

      MadOrange644 You...are...really...funny....ha...ha...ha........

    • @MadOrange644
      @MadOrange644 7 років тому

      Werty Werty Tell me something i don’t know

  • @d4rp645
    @d4rp645 6 років тому +9

    Yyyyeeeessss
    Batteries have been the thing that slowsdown technology
    But now new better tech is possible

  • @Psychopatacek
    @Psychopatacek 2 роки тому +3

    Where's the battery?

  • @lookatcha
    @lookatcha 7 років тому

    Your vidoes are deep, love watching them, keep up the good work

  • @DynamicHaze
    @DynamicHaze 7 років тому

    I love this channel. I'm so happy you're a UA-camr.

  • @BillBadMule123
    @BillBadMule123 6 років тому +8

    I Love Samsung Products ? Everything I buy is Samsung TV , Cell Phones , Computer SSD and Micro SD Cards .Very dependable Never had any problems of any kind .

  • @rachitgupta2208
    @rachitgupta2208 7 років тому +132

    2:10 thank me later

    • @paarthdesaai
      @paarthdesaai 7 років тому

      Rachit Gupta shukriya

    • @wobaleno
      @wobaleno 7 років тому +6

      I thank you now

    • @hypermangi8265
      @hypermangi8265 7 років тому +3

      Parth Desai In Urdu: "Shukriya", in English: "Thank You".
      Byw, Rachit Gupta. The "Thank me later" thing is overused. Try thinking something similar to this statement, but with a little dazzle.

    • @Lilcabinfever
      @Lilcabinfever 7 років тому +1

      Rachit Gupta thank you

    • @szoszaty
      @szoszaty 7 років тому +1

      "Thank me later" for what?

  • @L_U-K_E
    @L_U-K_E 7 років тому +3

    If Americans prefer Samsung over Apple does that mean Americans admit Koreans are better at making phones

  • @williamsaltsman6537
    @williamsaltsman6537 4 роки тому

    Can't wait for these to come out!

  • @BartoloOrtiz
    @BartoloOrtiz 7 років тому

    I always love your Hard Work doing this videos. Thanks you Guys.

  • @atlastobin7837
    @atlastobin7837 6 років тому +3

    Do a new video on John B Goodenough's invention of the "Glass Battery" that would be awesome, thanks.

  • @JonathanBrandonBissoo
    @JonathanBrandonBissoo 6 років тому +8

    Video starts at 2:10
    You're Welcome

  • @banditfpv
    @banditfpv 7 років тому +10

    A company called Turnigy, who make drone batteries, have been doing this for years. Finally people started seeing this

  • @sankalpnayak9369
    @sankalpnayak9369 6 років тому

    Looking forward to reading your book...best of luck..

  • @srinivasvaranasi1645
    @srinivasvaranasi1645 6 років тому

    Great Researchwork!

  • @hallo-xp2wh
    @hallo-xp2wh 6 років тому +21

    Imagine the one who patented this
    This is the future when gasoline dies

    • @Moarmilk
      @Moarmilk 4 роки тому

      abhi nav gasoline is not going to die. We pump out hundreds of trillions of tons and you really think it’s ‘dinosaur bones’?

    • @pflernak
      @pflernak 4 роки тому +1

      @@Moarmilk Youre right, it burns so it must be dragon bones

    • @ocrun6765
      @ocrun6765 4 роки тому

      "When" gasoline dies? As soon as battery technology surpasses the energy storage density of gasoline with reasonable recharge rates - gasoline will be obsolete. Carbon batteries are the solution. Ironic that it's carbon.

    • @pflernak
      @pflernak 4 роки тому

      @@ocrun6765 Id question if thats even theoretically possible. Not that youd need to get to that level of energy density anyway. Not in cars at least, maybe aircraft.

    • @ocrun6765
      @ocrun6765 4 роки тому

      @@pflernak Maybe not in pure density but in lets say, trip miles per unit of weight. Electric motors are more efficient giving batteries an advantage. However gasoline consumption reduces weight as it is used. Let's say if EVs can quadruple their current range with economical battery chemistries they will surely displace ICE vehicles. Then to aircraft. And residential solar arrays with economical storage. Anyhow. I like irony and carbon to the rescue is a good one.

  • @ChenChennesen
    @ChenChennesen 7 років тому +3

    Hopefully we'll see this in the s10

    • @ihab3678
      @ihab3678 4 роки тому

      Laughs in s20 🤣

  • @neiltsakatsa
    @neiltsakatsa 7 років тому +20

    Apple is like a viper, It waits silently for the right moment to strike !

    • @leftcoaster67
      @leftcoaster67 6 років тому +2

      Hilarious because it used to be Microsoft would let Apple try something, then they would copy it.

    • @tyronefromprison2844
      @tyronefromprison2844 5 років тому +1

      leftcoaster67 so you are saying Samsung copied apple in releasing the touch screen on their phones first.

    • @tyronefromprison2844
      @tyronefromprison2844 5 років тому +1

      Deyan Dachev yes I know it was first released by IBM. I think.

    • @tyronefromprison2844
      @tyronefromprison2844 5 років тому

      Deyan Dachev oh I know the answer to why they buy a bitten apple as the logo. So when Steve Jobs was thinking of some idea he was eating an apple. He took a bite out of it and later made it the logo.

    • @LawrenceCarroll1234
      @LawrenceCarroll1234 4 роки тому

      Deyan Dachev , I don’t know much about the history of touchscreens, your comment prompted me to look it up on Wikipedia.
      Anyway - while I haven’t got to who released the first touchscreen mobile phone - here is an excerpt on the history of touchscreens (just a teaser):
      The application of touch technology for air traffic control was described in an article published in 1968.[10] Frank Beck and Bent Stumpe, engineers from CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research), developed a transparent touchscreen in the early 1970s,[11] based on Stumpe's work at a television factory in the early 1960s. Then manufactured by CERN, and shortly after by industry partners,[12] it was put to use in 1973.[13] A resistive touchscreen was developed by American inventor George Samuel Hurst, who received US patent No. 3,911,215 on October 7, 1975.[14] The first version was produced in 1982.[15]
      In 1972, a group at the University of Illinois filed for a patent on an optical touchscreen[16] that became a standard part of the Magnavox Plato IV Student Terminal and thousands were built for this purpose. These touchscreens had a crossed array of 16×16 infrared position sensors, each composed of an LED on one edge of the screen and a matched phototransistor on the other edge, all mounted in front of a monochrome plasma display panel. This arrangement could sense any fingertip-sized opaque object in close proximity to the screen. A similar touchscreen was used on the HP-150 starting in 1983. The HP 150 was one of the world's earliest commercial touchscreen computers.[17] HP mounted their infrared transmitters and receivers around the bezel of a 9-inch Sony cathode ray tube (CRT).
      In 1984, Fujitsu released a touch pad for the Micro 16 to accommodate the complexity of kanji characters, which were stored as tiled graphics.[18] In 1985, Sega released the Terebi Oekaki, also known as the Sega Graphic Board, for the SG-1000 video game console and SC-3000 home computer. It consisted of a plastic pen and a plastic board with a transparent window where pen presses are detected. It was used primarily with a drawing software application.[19] A graphic touch tablet was released for the Sega

  • @ilovekitkat7857
    @ilovekitkat7857 7 років тому

    I've 1st heard of graphene about 2-3 years ago.....and it's still in its infancy stage.

  • @KvndS29
    @KvndS29 6 років тому

    Dude you're brilliant and you have a gift for sharing knowledge in a fun and interesting way. I look forward to learning more from your next video...Be well!

  • @manojrabin2174
    @manojrabin2174 6 років тому +6

    Why don't you make a graphene screen protector for smartphones

  • @Eskriba2010
    @Eskriba2010 6 років тому +3

    Cold fusion has never been proved.

  • @LemberTheMember
    @LemberTheMember 7 років тому +4

    Hope they create a good Graphene Batterie. All Graphene Batteries i used so far hadn't a long life because they don't last many cycles.

    • @benlawton5420
      @benlawton5420 7 років тому +3

      Because they are fake.

    • @xbraac
      @xbraac 7 років тому +1

      ben lawton They're not fake. They're outlined with real graphene, the amount of graphene they use though is very little because making graphene is incredibly hard.

    • @RWBHere
      @RWBHere 7 років тому

      Watch Robert Murray-Smith. His videos, on how to make graphene batteries, are interesting. It's relatively easy, if you have a small oven which can reach around 350° C.

  • @christianlibertarian5488
    @christianlibertarian5488 6 років тому

    Really interested in the book. Keep us updated!

  • @youxkio
    @youxkio 6 років тому

    Loved this video, thanks for uploading it @ColdFusion, I will have a presentation by the end of this semester and between several subjects to choose, this is one of several choices, so I guess I will stick with this one.

  • @MegaYoda2
    @MegaYoda2 7 років тому +4

    but will it note 3

  • @ok-se9jf
    @ok-se9jf 7 років тому +4

    samsung #1

  • @giovannisantos2539
    @giovannisantos2539 7 років тому +199

    SamSung #1

  • @alaudintarelli1761
    @alaudintarelli1761 7 років тому

    Great content as always

  • @paulnewhouse5126
    @paulnewhouse5126 6 років тому

    that guy pulling that graphene like that tripped me out so bad i had a little panic attack :P
    very fascinating!

  • @ethancolbert
    @ethancolbert 7 років тому +34

    It's not a graphene battery though... It's just a lithium ion battery with a little graphene smeared on the electrodes. Sure the potential charge (and presumably discharge) rate increase is great, but with the same energy density, and the same lifespan, this isn't anything revolutionary.

    • @ennyuiui
      @ennyuiui 7 років тому +15

      Ethan Colbert have you seen one of these used around phones? no. Will it be used by samsungs new phones? Maybe in the future. Will other brand of phone uses this / hires samsung and slap their own brand of "graphene battery" to their newest release aftee this goes to the market? Yes. Technically, it is revolutionary.

    • @ennyuiui
      @ennyuiui 7 років тому +20

      Plus, 45% more capacity than the state of the art battery is astounding, and even more, charging a phole would only take 12 min instead of 1 hr, so yeah this battery is kind of a big deal.

    • @hanro50
      @hanro50 6 років тому +2

      sleepepe
      Grathine could in theory be used to make capacitors.

    • @hanro50
      @hanro50 6 років тому

      Sievn Sievn
      I hope they at least share it, but considering Apple caused some bad blood with Samsung, I highly doubt we'll be seeing this on any Apple product.

    • @Yal_Rathol
      @Yal_Rathol 6 років тому +3

      this battery is also a proof of concept. cutting your charge time from 1 hr to 12 min in a proof of concept is fucking astounding, they're only now entering the prototype phase.
      these batteries are still years out, lots of testing to be done on optimal configurations and production methods, but they have now proven this can be done, which means that the world is about to change.

  • @Clienad0
    @Clienad0 7 років тому +5

    ummm I know some one has probably already said this but just in case...... Graphenes molecular structure is nothing at all like Diamond. Just so that people don`t get the wrong idea.

    • @frankspeaking2630
      @frankspeaking2630 6 років тому

      reneweconomy.com.au/working-solid-state-battery-produced-and-unveiled-at-battery-conference-in-new-york-22206/

  • @alexandermalik1556
    @alexandermalik1556 7 років тому +35

    "You are watching cold fusion TV ... " (Pause)
    ... Wait .... first LIKE then WATCH!

  • @zenithwong4725
    @zenithwong4725 7 років тому

    good work Agogo, enjoy your work!

  • @eaaeeeea
    @eaaeeeea 7 років тому

    I've been watching the graphene developement with a great deal of excitement! I was so happy when I read the news about Samsung filing for patents regarding graphene battery tech, and now I'm even more happy when they actually have developed and tested the batteries! Can't wait for the graphene batteries to appear on new phones!

  • @TabalugaDragon
    @TabalugaDragon 5 років тому +4

    I don't care about charging time. I care about bigger capacity and longevity for the sake of resources of our planet and my wallet

    • @TabalugaDragon
      @TabalugaDragon 5 років тому +1

      Lycan umm so? I didn't say it would come out of nowhere. I'm ok with having a bigger, more powerful charger or for my phone to charge a little longer because of increased capacity

    • @rel1stone121
      @rel1stone121 5 років тому

      But isnt graphene using the same amount of energy to charge a battery in under a min while also keeping long capacity charge over all which means you are saving an immense of amount of power over all?

  • @MFizzle777
    @MFizzle777 7 років тому +23

    Apple waits for other to do it then steals ideas calling them their own!

    • @RWBHere
      @RWBHere 7 років тому +1

      And I stole the idea of using four wooden legs to make a chair, and then called it my own. Is that wrong?

    • @mywow8975
      @mywow8975 6 років тому +4

      RWBHere it's wrong if you say you invented it

    • @CorporateShill
      @CorporateShill 6 років тому

      +My Wow
      That's the thing most apple fans get wrong

    • @abird6217
      @abird6217 6 років тому

      MFizzle777 So what about the things that Samsung ripped off from apple? Did you conveniently forget about dual cameras and 3D Touch? I also want to point out that Apples phones are much more powerful than Samsung’s phones and also feature much better optimisation.

    • @CorporateShill
      @CorporateShill 6 років тому

      the comment is 2 months old, you tryhard fanboy. samsung sucks but apple fanboys are the worst delusional humans ever. apple didnt come up with dual cameras, huawei came up with that first. samsung made only the home button to be activated with force touch because they hid the navigation keys

  • @himanshu6489
    @himanshu6489 7 років тому +23

    Who liked before watching this video? I did

    • @erikliljeberg1796
      @erikliljeberg1796 7 років тому +5

      celebrity vines who is tired these shit comments?

    • @himanshu6489
      @himanshu6489 7 років тому +2

      Erik liljeberg you.

    • @soleil3gs
      @soleil3gs 7 років тому +1

      celebrity vines Your mom

    • @bloodyglitch1777
      @bloodyglitch1777 7 років тому

      God these comments are annoying

    • @BreakingNVain
      @BreakingNVain 7 років тому

      Better question, who is dumb enough to care?

  • @FrazerGoddon
    @FrazerGoddon 7 років тому +1

    I look forward to your book, I'll definitely pick it up :)

  • @4409rjf
    @4409rjf 6 років тому

    Love your videos, keep it up and can't wait to see the book