STEVE GREGG's Follow up on Resurrection Debate Complete "I promised a written response to cover all the points made by my opponent in the debate on the Resurrection of Christ, which took place about a week ago. That written addendum is now posted at this link (Warning: It is 34 pages long)" : www.matthew713.com/notes/files/addendum_to_resurrection_debate_with_Mark_Reid.pdf
Props to Steve Gregg for making himself available for the debate, regardless of scheduling and last minute opponent changes. It’s inspiring how much of his time and resources he freely gives for Christ’s Kingdom!
I was hoping Steve would share the Rich Man & Lazarus with Mark the atheist. The Resurrection IS the proof, the INFALLIBLE proof (only time the word is used in the Bible) in Acts 1:3.
The fool has said in his heart "there is no God." There is no point arguing with a fool according to Proverbs. If our Gospel be hid, it is hid to those who are PERISHING. Christianity isnt about intellect, it is a supernatural work whereby God gifts a man with faith and draws him to his Son. Not all men have faith. You are looking at a dead man walking; pray God grants him repentance.
Not sure where this gentleman lives but it brings to mind how its practically against the law in Australia to even have Steve's beliefs let alone this discussion openly with out cops showing up at your door for hate speech violence and misinformation
@@markshaneh no disrespect sir great debate May I ask hypothetically if you could control the way for example schools could teach would you be fine with both sides being taught to all
At the end of the day, a christian is going to choose to believe and a non-christian will not. It just seems to me that if our alleged eternal souls are on the line, i would have appreciated if god would have made the proof of all this much clearer.
This Mark guy isn't nearly as intelligent nor as good of a debater as he seems to believe he is. He was very sloppy, imo. He sounded more like a petulant and rebellious child trying to argue himself out of something, just throwing things out and as soon as they are refuted and slapped down, side-stepling to hurl another diversion to obfuscate and distract...
He said he had a problem with the date of the crucifixion and Passover. Steve explained how it’s a non issue and his response is “that sounds like bs because you’re making stuff up to fit here say”. It is painful to listen to. It’s like playing a video game against someone exponentially better than you at the game. The skill gap can be so high the worse player sometimes thinks the better player is cheating. This happens a lot. The skill gap is so large that skill looks like cheating. That’s what this is. Steve explained exactly why his issue is a non issue and he said it was bogus and made up and then when Steve defended he responded with a question about a different topic instead of getting to the end of the road about Passover. I mean that’s just embarrassing. To sit on the internet and do that? Hard pass. Steve won this debate. If that even needs to be said.
It's disappointing that Steve doesn't seem to be familiar with basic arguments for the resurrection or extrabiblical writings referencing Jesus and the resurrection.
Steve’s very capable and has receipts to back his position. This guy opposing Steve wouldn’t believe the resurrection if he witnessed one. Pure sceptic with no desire to consider any other view that doesn’t align with his views.
STEVE GREGG's Follow up on Resurrection Debate Complete
"I promised a written response to cover all the points made by my opponent in the debate on the Resurrection of Christ, which took place about a week ago. That written addendum is now posted at this link (Warning: It is 34 pages long)" :
www.matthew713.com/notes/files/addendum_to_resurrection_debate_with_Mark_Reid.pdf
Props to Steve Gregg for making himself available for the debate, regardless of scheduling and last minute opponent changes. It’s inspiring how much of his time and resources he freely gives for Christ’s Kingdom!
Love Steve Gregg!
Great debate Steve. This guy got dismantled.
Mark is ridiculous. Always interrupts Steve every time Steve would talk.
I was hoping Steve would share the Rich Man & Lazarus with Mark the atheist. The Resurrection IS the proof, the INFALLIBLE proof (only time the word is used in the Bible) in Acts 1:3.
Of course the atheist is turning this into a debate about the whole of the Bible itself not about whether there was a resurrection or not.
The fool has said in his heart "there is no God."
There is no point arguing with a fool according to Proverbs.
If our Gospel be hid, it is hid to those who are PERISHING.
Christianity isnt about intellect, it is a supernatural work whereby God gifts a man with faith and draws him to his Son. Not all men have faith. You are looking at a dead man walking; pray God grants him repentance.
Steve is great, him & Sam Shamoun you can’t stump, super smart.
Not sure where this gentleman lives but it brings to mind how its practically against the law in Australia to even have Steve's beliefs let alone this discussion openly with out cops showing up at your door for hate speech violence and misinformation
I live in Australia and millions of us openly believe what Steve believes.
@@markshaneh no disrespect sir great debate
May I ask hypothetically if you could control the way for example schools could teach would you be fine with both sides being taught to all
He will soon enough know what the evidence is. The rude non believer needs prayers too. Mr Gregg always shows his patience and knowledge of the Bible!
At the end of the day, a christian is going to choose to believe and a non-christian will not. It just seems to me that if our alleged eternal souls are on the line, i would have appreciated if god would have made the proof of all this much clearer.
This Mark guy isn't nearly as intelligent nor as good of a debater as he seems to believe he is. He was very sloppy, imo. He sounded more like a petulant and rebellious child trying to argue himself out of something, just throwing things out and as soon as they are refuted and slapped down, side-stepling to hurl another diversion to obfuscate and distract...
He said he had a problem with the date of the crucifixion and Passover. Steve explained how it’s a non issue and his response is “that sounds like bs because you’re making stuff up to fit here say”. It is painful to listen to. It’s like playing a video game against someone exponentially better than you at the game. The skill gap can be so high the worse player sometimes thinks the better player is cheating. This happens a lot. The skill gap is so large that skill looks like cheating. That’s what this is. Steve explained exactly why his issue is a non issue and he said it was bogus and made up and then when Steve defended he responded with a question about a different topic instead of getting to the end of the road about Passover. I mean that’s just embarrassing. To sit on the internet and do that? Hard pass. Steve won this debate. If that even needs to be said.
I hate that question. It's not a question, it's a fact.
You need to say "CHRIST JESUS ROSE FROM THE DEAD!"
It's not a question
Why's the aetheist so semi hostile?+ Has he lost a lot of people to Christ.
My wonder is if this gentleman believes in freedom of religion and speech or if he's patiently "tolerating" opposed positions
It's disappointing that Steve doesn't seem to be familiar with basic arguments for the resurrection or extrabiblical writings referencing Jesus and the resurrection.
Oh, he does. Go to his website and listen to any other debates.
Steve’s very capable and has receipts to back his position.
This guy opposing Steve wouldn’t believe the resurrection if he witnessed one.
Pure sceptic with no desire to consider any other view that doesn’t align with his views.