13:28: "Normally, notches cut in a gun reflect kills. In this case, I think this means this has fired three shots successfully." Oooo... that's a good burn!
I knew Joe Hale. He could talk the leg off a Donkey. He ended up running a small gun shop in Florida a Suburb of Johannesburg. The shop went belly up and Joe disappeared. Which I assume was quite normal for him. I can assure you he would be the last person I would allow to specify heat treatment of SS steel.Thanks for a highly interesting series.
@@darrengarcia4937 Well Colt is bankrupt, S&W is living off a practical but rather plain series of well-made carry automatics and revolvers (some of which I believe have even been adopted as service pistols), while Ruger is doing rather well with many well selling practical designs, from guns like the LCP, to the well-reviewed (although practically entry level as far as precisions go) Ruger Precision rifles and Ruger Precision rimfire (I own one, absolute tack driver), to it's AR series which is no slouch, to it's something like 60+ year production of the 10/22 and the .22 pistols it makes? How about that new, very well reviewed FiftySeven? Just above a taurus? Dude, what are you saying? Ruger is killing it, has been for the last decade.
@@darrengarcia4937 Ruger produces quality firearms, "a step above Taurus" (y'know, guns that explode or go off unintentionally) is severely undervaluing them as a company
What I learned from this video was that in the late '70s, at least among southern African practical shooters, the Smith & Wesson Model 59 was considered the best combat handgun in the world.
And the day came whereupon Gun Jesus did sit down amongst the serpents and did hold a mamba within his hands. "Lord Gun Jesus, " cried his followers, "be ye not afraid that the serpent taken up thusly may bite thee?" "No," spake Gun Jesus, "for this serpent is one of metal and is as dangerous and useful as is a scrotum upon a cow." And his followers did see the wisdom of his words and contemplated upon the scrotum burdened cow. Yet one questioned Him thusly; "But Lord, thou art the Gun Jesus. Can you not turn this thing of crap unto a thing of firing fun-ness?" Gun Jesus looked upon him and smiled upon him and it was as if the sun did rise for him, "No you tit," saith Gun Jesus, "I wouldst rather spend my time with the angel made Browning, Baretta, Smith and Wesson where it is known that ye can usually letteth rip more than 3 rounds before disappointment setteth in." And the one was chastened yet did he still follow Gun Jesus for He is good and righteous and he did know that he was a tit.
No the zip 22 is worse . It failed to even look like a gun and you have to put your finger in front of the gun to charge a round . This gun looks like a gun and doesn't require placing any part of your body in front of the weapon to operate .
Would that put the Rogak in 3rd place then? I'm not sure I can agree with that batting order. I don't think Ian would have even tried to fire the Rogak (I think he'd have deemed it unsafe). He did fire the Zip .22, and I think he'd be ok with firing this pistol.
I think this one barely qualifies as a "production" pistol due to the small numbers produced, therefore it's difficult to compare to something like the Zip 22. This is more like an extended marketing campaign based on a couple hundred prototypes.
"The project went to New Jersey, and died. There are very few of these left." A tale as old as time, amiright? You can't make something better by making it in New Jersey.
After the Bush War, Joe Hale moved back to the United States and reentered the firearms industry under the name "Ron Cohen." That's the only possible explanation for Kimber and Sig.
@@shinobi-no-bueno sig p320 is much much better than Glock in modularity, trigger, accuracy, durability, and I've seen tons of negligent discharges from Glocks, actually my ex gf got shot by one. You have to pull the trigger to break down a Glock and it has no safety. Firing upon re-holstering is the only not dummy proof part of a striker design. I have fnx-45, fn 509, and a sig p320 with three different frames, one of which is metal. They are all SO much better than a glock
@@shinobi-no-bueno And one day if you ever carry a gun everyday you will soon see the merits of a striker fired pistol vs like a 3 pound steel 1911 with 8 shots
What a blast from the past! I worked in Rhodesia in 1977 and 1978 and I remember the media hype about the Mamba. I recall reading about it in a South African magazine called SCOPE. People were wild about the idea that they might be able to buy a pistol. There were NONE for sale in Rhodesia - I had picked up a Star Super-B 9mm in Johannesburg on my way to Rhodesia. When I left in 78 I sold it in Salisbury for a good deal more than I had paid. Great video.
I have a March 1978 issue of Guns & Ammo that reviews the Navy Arms Mamba. It says that almost everything is cast stainless steel including the barrel, and claims Navy Arms will import castings to be finished in the US. A quote from the article: 'The secret is in the heat treating of the cast barrels, and beyond that Navy Arms has nothing to say'. The author says he didn't test it thoroughly because it was a first prototype, but it appeared to be very reliable. Also stated is that the magazine holds 14 rounds, and the DA trigger weighed 22lbs!
Large DA/SA semi-auto in 9x19, made almost entirely of castings (including the barrel), with a 15 round magazine? Sounds a lot like the Ruger P89, except that the P89 is actually a functional gun. 😂
I was about to say, p89 may be cast and ugly but it was my first semi auto I owned and I shot the crap out of it with everything I could find, hot hand loads, lead and even some Israeli Uzi surplus that was supposed to only be for smg and it never had a malfunction, I traded it later for a 92fs but it was definitely reliable and combat accurate lol
I recall reading any number of magazine articles about this "wonder pistol" and then nothing....The only modern pistol that got more attention than the Mamba was the Bren Ten.....And we know how that one worked out even with Jeff Cooper beating the drums for it.
The Bren Ten wasn't a bad or poorly designed pistol but getting spare mags was and still is nearly impossible. The gun really does work but it was poorly marketed (even though it was Sonny Crockett's gun of choice in the first season of "Miami Vice").
@@marvindebot3264 I cannot and would not argue the point with you. However, here in the U.S.A. it was a near total flop. I knew three or four people who purchased Bren 10s new in the box and all but one of them, a collector who is also an avid shooter, found their pistols to be unreliable due to poor or at least substandard quality. Problems with feeding and extraction, jamming (primarily smokestack jams) topped the list of failures associated with the pistols that I know of. All but one of the above-mentioned pistols were sold after multiple trips to quality gunsmiths failed to rectify the problems the original owners had with the. Two were replaced by CZ-75s and one by a Colt's in 10mm. The fourth pistol ended up in the owner's substantial collection as a "non-shooter" after he spent a LOT of money trying to get it up to a level of dependability that would have made it trustworthy as a daily carry pistol. I've always suspected that the Bren 10s that entered this country were, for some reason, ammo sensitive but since I only came close to buying one myself, I have no hand experience, except for a few rounds fired from the fourth pistol mentioned above two of which resulted in two smokestack jams out of a single magazine. IF I recall correctly Norma ammo was utilized at one time or another by all four owners and, compared to other 10mm ammo available at the time, was considered "warm enough" to cycle the action MOST of the time. Carefully crafted handloads brought the reliability up, on that fourth pistol, to around 90%. I must confess that even the least reliable of the Bren 10s I crossed paths with were very, very accurate when they worked. I came so close to buying a Bren 10 back then that I had made it a point to research a couple of holsters and even tracked down a reliable source for Norma ammo and two extra magazines but once the men I knew, who had far and away greater financial resources that I could lay claim to started having problems with their pistols I took a hard pass on a Bren 10 and purchased a "GI" Browning in 9mm (my least favorite but by far more abundant chambering and ammo).
To prevent cracking and breakage of cast parts, even some stamped parts, I grind and polish cast flash and sharp edges. I also do it for aesthetic purposes. It's unfortunate that most manufacturers don't use this practice, but it is labor intensive and greatly increases manufacturing costs. It is a task left to end users and rebuilders.
I don't really know anything about metallurgy, so the whole thing about the heat-treating cycle is flying over my head. Is a 24-hour cycle too long or too short? How does it affect/what does it have to do with the gun not working? In what specific way(s) does it "not work?" Basically, I think Ian left out a lot of important info on this one.
I think carburizing stainless is a lot harder than carburizing just steel. I heard carburizing steel is quite an easy process. Put the steel in a sealed container, heat it up to critical temperature and it's done. Green beetle channel demonstrated that quite a while ago. This process can "infuse" the carbon element up to 1 mm into the steel as far as I remember. However, I doubt this carburizing procedure cause this gun not working properly. Nevertheless I had never own a gun and had never carburize steel before so don't count me on this one. But I agree that gun jesus this time might cause me to have sleep deprivation due to this question. Why the hell does this gun not work.
It all really depends on the base alloy. Carburizing is forcing carbon atoms into the spaces between the iron atoms to increase the hardness through diffusion. The time is only one piece of the equation temperature also matters. This can be very finicky as you end up with metal of different hardness and or microstructure. If not done properly you have a surface or area of depth that is either to hard and brittle or too soft and weak. Hope this clears things up a little.
@@justforever96 Most carburizing is done by heating components in either a pit furnace, or sealed atmosphere furnace, and introducing carburizing gases at temperature. Gas carburizing allows for accurate control of both the process temperature and carburizing atmosphere (carbon potential). Carburizing is a time/temperature process; the carburizing atmosphere is introduced into the furnace for the required time to ensure the correct depth of case. The carbon potential of the gas can be lowered to permit diffusion, avoiding excess carbon in the surface layer. The 24 hours is critical because truncated Decarb begins well under 10 hours into the process, big fail.
@@justforever96 well metal can be too hard and shatter under pressure, or too soft and deform under pressure. Probably too hard in this case as i think the gun would still work if bits were slightly deformed with every use but just one shot and it shatters even one bit and obviously its not gonna work at all.
I think the issues with this are similar to the L85a1, in that the design itself is mostly sound with a few flaws, but the real issue is the method of manufacture, so things like an inadequately heat treated hammer or firing pin causing it to break, or things like brittle springs etc. Basically, decent design, but poor manufacturing leading to parts that easily break or malfunction.
So, Lessons Learnt: 1. Never go away and actually build anything that got designed by a bunch of guys in a bar, 2. Never let a draughtsman double as a production engineer unless they're actually qualified to do so. Who'd a thunk it?
Harold Weaver Smith, the draughtsman isn't the one who was insisting on the weird engineering decisions (regarding the heat treatment). I'd suspect he was actually more qualified than that guy.
More lessons: a) the Browning Hi-Power wasn't so bad after all... (just look how widely it was used and for how long) b) John Browning and Dieudonné Saive really were genius gun inventors.
1) It depends on who the guys at the bar are. IE, the Ferrari Dino project started as a bar conversation between Enzo Ferrari, Dino Ferrari and Vittorio Jano on what would have been the best angle between the banks of a V6 engine.
IRRC the M82 Barrett was the same, couple of guys drinking and someone said 'Bet you can't make a rifle that shoots .50', Ronnie Barrett decided it was a bet worth taking
I recall seeing a Mamba pistol approximately forty plus years ago in City Guns Hout Street Cape Town South Africa. I think it was gold in colour and when I held it in my hand I noticed that the slide to frame fit was very loose.
Sounds like the Chevy Vega of the handguns. Started out with a great idea but ended up being poorly engineered and produced. Both were of similar time periods by the way.
yeah, there are four stages to design and production on which you can do a massive flop. 1. Market, 2. Design, 3. Technology, 4. Communication. Arguably the 1,3 and 4 are the most important bits.
IIRC, the Vega had an aluminum block. It was marketed well as they sold a bunch, but there was a a problem with step 2 -improper cooling and shifing cylindervsleeves.
I am one of the few people who got a good Vega. The worst problem I had with it was that the horsepower dropped to near zero when I would hit about 3,500ft above sea level. You know something is wrong when a VW microbus hauling a trailer can pass you but it made for some hilarious times wondering if we would make it to the top of a pass.
"I think it's worth pointing out that this is, in fact, objectively the INcorrect way to hold a pistol." Epic. As Ian describes him, Joe Hale reminds me a bit of Malcolm Bricklin, whose eponymous '70s car company was basically the prototype for DeLorean (gull wings doors, massive government grant scams in a place where no reasonable person would build a car factory, and all), and who then went on to found YugoCars, Inc., the company that imported the Zastava Koral to the US, badged as the notorious Yugo. Mind you, Bricklin also founded Subaru of America, so, y'know, stopped clock twice a day and all that. But the whole "super-confident serial entrepreneur who lurches bombastically from disaster to disaster" thing sounds very similar.
Today, the Mamba is a vary scarce pistol, for all the obvious reasons. Many thanks to the South African collection who provided this one for filming! e ⬆ typo in the description. I'm surprised it hasn't been caught in all these years.
Most of what i hear in bars it's rubbish; even most of what i say in the bar it's also rubbish to be honest... i don't think that a bar is "the best place" to design a firearm.
The Marine Corps started in a bar. It seems to have worked out . I can't think of another example so it becomes more of the exception rather than the rule .
If I'm not mistaken, Gaston Glock started working on his pistol after some people made fun of him during a conversation at a cocktail party. Not a bar, but enough alcohol for some shit talking and Glock to get passed.
Had they got the galling issue fixed it still would have been a flop. Look at the profile of the pistol; extremely high bore axis and almost square grip angle. That's a recipe for muzzle flip and I suspect discerning buyers would have dropped it pretty quick.
Ian, I remember reading about this when it was being developed, and much hype was made of the 2 and 3 round bursts, both claimed to be effective, by not climbing too far out of the center mass of a human target.
I've heard of Ian mostly through other gun channels, and I have to say, I immediately love this guy. Great demeanor on screen, obviously very knowledgeable and VERY entertaining both through his thoroughness and obvious passion for the subject. Keep up the good work!!
My local gun shop in Johannesburg had a gold plated one for sale. Serial number 003 if I remember correctly. Nobody back then wanted to buy a gold paper weight. Took them ages to sell it. Wish I had bought it but I was young and broke.
I remember this horror story, didn't help using the same grade of stainless steel for all the parts! I'm in South Africa and I bought all the Man and Man Magnum magazines for over forty years...
I worked the first 30 years of my adult life in the electronics industry, and there were lots and lot of much-hyped epic failures. Marketing types are cast from the same mold, just different alloys. Some actually did not lie through their teeth, but these tended to be less successful -- failures were always the fault of the Engineers (of which I was one). The more things change the more they stay the same. zNice vidoe - Very Interesting!
While I never saw a Mamba in the wild, I did drool over the adds. I did, however around that time have a Smith Model 59 that I carried as a duty weapon. I liked the gun overall but the trigger pull was awful, that was why I sold it off and went to a 1911A1. So much easier with a single action cocked and locked .45ACP pistol, the trigger, of course on the 1911 was lovely and I did have an adjustable for over travel long trigger installed in the pistol that made it even better, and a flat mainspring housing with the nice Pacmayer grips to help with the recoil of the full house FMJ rounds that I fed her. The Dakota's offer an interesting place to carry a .45, the cold winters mean that most everyone you encounter that might need shooting have a LOT of cloths between them and the outdoors what with sub zero weather common in winter. So I figured FMJ would give better penetration when the snow flies, and even in summer the extra punch of a FMJ just sounded right to me. Perhaps it was my 8 years as a Soldier back in the 70's that added to this thought, plus I liked the added functionality of FMJ rounds while I saw some fellows with .45's feeding them hollow points have jam problems where I never had a burp giggle or fart out of my old war horses.
It is very, very *difficult* to re-heat treat any metal part after it has been initially carburized, annealed, tempered and whatever else this had done to it. It is _possible_ though, but you would probably have to go through several frames to get the process working properly.
"We made the best combat handgun ever!" -ALL THE PARTS ARE CRUDE CASTS... talk about ghetto... "Normally, notches cut in a gun reflect kills. In this case, I think this means this has fired three shots successfully."... ROFL
In that era stainless steel guns, even revolvers (what few there available), were ALL prone to galling with any kind of prolonged use. Its taken decades to get the right combination of metallurgy and heat treating to get it right. Guns & Ammo magazine did a light-weight puff piece article on the Mamba, with no test firing. Everyone wanted one. Nobody could get them. So in the end, we all went back to shooting tricked out 1911's and hi-powers. Because that's all there was, if you were serious about combat pistol craft. Nobody shot Smiths (39's or 59's).
Who the hell are these guys that created a list for an "ideal semi-auto" - that's made of CASTINGS instead of STAMPINGS??? And, they didn't even consider the truly superior, if completely unnecessary(I take it every idea in the list was completely unnecessary, sooo...), choice of them all - forgings??? It's like saying "I'm going to build the best engine ever - let's start with a cast crank, cast pistons, and cast rods!" - HUH??? I'm really REALLY into extremely weird, ridiculous, over the top, unnecessary, and even uniquely bad firearms(my dream arms collection would be a largely unshootable disaster of oddballs...), but I can honestly say that there is absolutely NOTHING redeeming about this. It isn't even noteworthy as a failure...
Among the desiderabile features of a firearm "no stamped parts" is probably at the bottom of the list. IE, in the same timeframe, the Benelli B76, that was a high quality firearm, with a competition-level trigger out of the box, had completely stamped frame and slide.
Yeah. Massive race to implement this amazing game-changing stamping technology a few decades before, and these guys are like "nah, we like the lower quality old expensive way better".
A race to the bottom fueled by hubris and ego. Giving control of technical details to a random jackoff worker who doesn't know what the hell he's doing is never a good idea.
Ironically, your description makes it quite appealing as a collector's item - the stupidest gun on earth. It's not stupid in any novel or interesting way, like the Zip22, and that just makes it even more stupid.
It looks like a S&W 645 but with a rounded trigger guard. The .45acp was very popular up until 2015 or so. Smith & Wesson had a few problems with the 645 but they were already going to roll out the 3rd gen lines in different calibers.
I am subscribed to South African magazine Man Magnum you mentioned since 2003, it is a great magazine. They even published my letter on the Arisaka cartridge that my father had found in a garden. Now it is possible to get an electronic subscription. Regards from Yevgen, Ukraine.
If I recall properly, the Add in Merc News said they would produce a "Black Mamba and a Green Mamba" I don't recall the differences other then the finish available on the guns though, wish I had my old copy. I never thought of merc work, sounded to off beat to me but I had a buddy who dreamed of it every day, and talked about it every damn time we were assigned to the same squad car.
Thank you for doing these, Ian. I think the only other place I've received this much gun knowledge is when I watch old episodes of American Rifleman/Tales of the Gun that use to come on the History Channel back in the day. They actually have full episodes all over UA-cam. Thanks again!
So it's interesting how this thing's origin was essentially identical to that of the Fairbairn-Sykes Fighting Knife, except designed by people who don't actually know all that much about weapons beyond the very basics
The 'galling'; Ian could have gone into a bit more detail, but stainless steel doesn't like to slide against itself under heat and pressure. With all-stainless guns, the slide and frame have to be heat-treated differently to prevent galling. Until this became practical, stainless autos were not practical. For their other issues, Colts got it right; my stainless Combat Commander has been flawless.
The normally separate pieces of the gun will spontaneously weld themselves together in small spots. Then when they are forced apart you're left with little tears and bumps in the parts' surface. Generally terrible.
Thank you for hours of content gun Jesus. My favorite part of these videos is you can always tell how much disdain you have for elements of firearms you don't like and or that never worked but you still give massive amounts of unbiased information. Thank you Ian
How did you come to do so many videos on South African weapons? You taught me as a South African more about local weapons than anybody else did. Really enjoy your videos and subscribed.
I'm curious what the final "best of combat pistols" list was, because this pistol seems to suggest "Model 59, but what if it had a trick safety lever, was made of cast stainless, and it didn't work?"
I recall seeing these as a full page (Back Page no less) Add on some Mercenary magazine that a buddy gave me years ago. Man I was drooling at the gun, thought it would be the best I could get by that add, thankfully I never got an opportunity to buy one, because I would have, I had a real knack for buying pretty much junk guns and thinking I had a collectors dream.
In the late 70s and early 80s everybody who started making all stainless steel Firearms with suffering exactly the same problems. You must use differential types of stainless. You cannot use the same type of stainless on parts that have to interact with each other. Stainless has a natural tendency to gall especially against another piece that has to interact with it that is also the same type of stainless. It was a learning cycle in Metallurgy at that time. Some people even had the bright idea to soak their firearms down in WD-40 before they went into a shooting match. That only ended up with guns locked in mid cycle and unable to be disassembled because WD-40 is not a lubricant, it is a solvent
Good ending: Ian decides to fix the Mamba, and shoots it Bad ending: Ian decides to shoot the Mamba without fixing it, the slide exploding off and hitting him in the nuts True ending: Ian never shoots it, it was never meant to be shot
You know it's a good video when it starts with what sounds like a bad joke. "So two guys are sitting in a bar in Rhodesia..." Turns out it was a bad joke. All of it. This gun didn't even stop firing with certain ammo, or in certain environments. It's truly a failure when you can pull it straight out of the box and have it misfire on its maiden cartridge.
I remember this pistol well. Joe Hale was quite a character, if you're interested in Rhodesia and his adventures he wrote a book "Red Zambezi" there's a lot more to him than this failed attempt at pistol manufacture.
I remember pictures of that gun on magazines of the day. As an aside, I bought an Egyptian Hakim from a fellow who said it belonged to Val Forgett of Navy Arms. I don't know whether he was telling the truth or not but it was the nicest Hakim I ever saw and I no longer own it.
Strange. Usually Rhodesian and South African designs tend to be very practical. Here they go to all that effort for an overengineered pistol and mess it up with the manufacturing. A pity the AMerican production never took off. It would have been interesting so see if a properly made weapon would have worked. Still, even looking just at the design, what's so special about it? They could have bought any number of existing guns with pretty much the same features.
The primary reason for all of these practical Rhodesian and South African designs they were under embargo by the west. They could not legally buy arms from any western manufacturers.
One side note I'd like answered is what is the deal exactly with the CZ 75 having been so popular in South Africa and Rhodesia, despite it being a Czech (or Czechoslovakian then) gun that obviously was from a Warsaw Pact country? I've heard Rhodesians bought their CZ 75s in South Africa, but why were recently-designed Eastern Bloc pistols being sold to South Africa at a time when much of the world and especially the Communist world had an embargo on South Africa and condemned their government so publicly? AFAIK they were legit CZ 75s (and being so recent I can't imagine there was much time to have good-quality reproductions made elsewhere), so did Czechoslovakia just not care as long as they got the money and for some reason Warsaw Pact countries weren't actually prohibited from selling arms to a direct enemy of the Soviet Union?
seanseanston The Czechs were noted for selling guns to just about anyone during the Cold War as they were one of the more independent of the Warsaw Pact Nations. Somewhat like the Yugoslavians but the Czechs remained in the Soviet Sphere due to them being invaded.
Zastava is understandable since Yugoslavia was outside the Warsaw Pact, but it's very interesting that it seems Warsaw Pact countries were more independent in their foreign policy than you'd think, considering they were selling to direct ideological enemies of the USSR. It does remind me of something I saw lately though in that show Deutschland 86, where it focuses on the historical dealings East Germany did selling weapons to South Africa. I suppose the USSR realized that money from arms deals could be lucrative and maybe it would be against their long-term interests to deprive their satellite states of money they could use to stave off economic problems?
Ian the Mamba was never touted as a weapon for the military.. in the field and in combat over the 1970 - 80 period we used Brownings, Barettas (branded as Vektor), CZ and a few old Colt pistols in this order .. all struggled with the fine dust in the bush and required lots of cleaning and oiling to be reliable and safe. Sandock never produced any firearms of note for SANDF but we're HUGE and world class in armoured vehicle production
A working home production handgun would have held obvious advantages for countries with international arms embargoes against them. Why they chose stainless steel castings for a gun that was not going to have much in the way of sales outside the area is a mystery. Selling a gun with poor rifling as a feature is kind of an uphill battle in the best of times.
Freedom Group owned Remington is now making ACRs that have barrels working loose after a mag or two, resulting in a failure to feed along with a redesigned safety selector that uses screws, which also loosen and back out. How long before the Remington ACR is on Forgotten Weapons?
this reminds me of the guy in africa that build a shed out of wavey sheetmetals. called it a controlroom. and now they try to build airplanes out of heavy steelbeams. motorized with a bikeengine. they crashed every time(of course!) the goal is to set up an international airport....
So what did the heat treating actually do to the gun? Having trouble imagining what "not working at all" even looks like in the case of a gun. It wouldn't even fire a shot? Wouldn't reload properly? What was it?
Ever heard of Hege Waffen in West Germany? I bought one of these pistols for my wife. It was a copy of a Walther PPK and of high quality manufacture. The one I bought was chambered for 380 ACP and the mag held 8 rounds. A very nice carry gun. Wish I had never sold it, and have never seen the make again anywhere - maybe do a run down by FW on these, they seem to be well "forgotten"!
That was fun watching as always!:) I don't know about how guns work at all (I really should do some study, I know), but I like to learn about the history behind them. Cheers!
I like how the gun looks. Wonder if one could get a hold of the scematics and actually build it right and functional, in a production setting rather than handmade
God I miss Navy Arms in Ridgefield NJ. It was a little storefront on their warehouse stuffed to the rafters with surplus arms. Mausers and SMLEs and everything else you could imagine. Sigh
Those three marks on the grip are for Monster Energy Drink company. Years ago Sarco was selling these. Was tempted but knew nothing about them. Havent given them any thought till seeing your video.
After maybe 12ish videos I can say this. You sir are one knowledgeable guy.
5 років тому+2
Is there an actual gun that promised to be "the best ever" that actually delivered something else than besides a fully flawed end product? It seems that whenever gun producers hoped to overachieve or make a simple non-great weapon, they actually created the opposite
Any reference on stainless steels such as the Carpenter Steel Blue Book will tell you that you use different hardness or heat treat will prevent some galling of stainless. Surgical instrument designers deal with those issues everyday. For the most part you are better off designing pistols out of carbon steel.
Another case of money not equaling brains. As far as I can tell, the only things that this pistol has that other, better guns do not, is that totally superfluous "safety" feature where you have to pull back on the hammer to engage the safety, and that overly complex adjustable mainspring. Man, people like Joe Hale (however it's spelled) are the modern incarnations of snake oil salesmen... and I mean that in the most insulting, degrading way. ... But another wonderfully fascinating video by Ian. Thank you for entertaining and informing us! Oh, and I think I have ALWAYS learned something new whenever I have watched one of your many epic videos! 😁👍
13:28: "Normally, notches cut in a gun reflect kills. In this case, I think this means this has fired three shots successfully." Oooo... that's a good burn!
Ian is trying to save the design by turning up the heat for sure.
...Gonna need a senzu for that one.
Gratuitous Lurking SENZU BEAN!
lefr33man shots attempted!
LoL, more bite than a Mamba
I knew Joe Hale. He could talk the leg off a Donkey. He ended up running a small gun shop in Florida a Suburb of Johannesburg. The shop went belly up and Joe disappeared. Which I assume was quite normal for him. I can assure you he would be the last person I would allow to specify heat treatment of SS steel.Thanks for a highly interesting series.
Can you remember the name? FN Arms... ?? In Flora Centre..
Was he as much of an asshole as he seems?
Are you serious? Wow
Any relation to Alan Hale of infamous Stander gang bank robbers?
@@DavidBrown-wh1ix Or Alan Hale of Gilligan's Island? 😂
We really like the S&W59 but we can't import them so what do we do?
I've got an idea, here's my Sniff and Lesson model pifty pine
Wow you're a genius
hahaha thanks i had a chuckle at "Sniff and Lesson model pifty pine" !! lol
Then the Koreans said "Hold my beer..." and the K5 was born.
*Smill and Welson
warriorwolf77 Swith & Messon
Wonder what John Browning would think of this. It's like someone said, "how badly can I bastardize a Browning hi power. " Pretty badly 🤣🤣
“No stamped parts” Oh, neat! “All cast parts” Oh, Yikes
@@0neDoomedSpaceMarine yeah but what was the last time anyone really bought a Ruger for a good gun? Just above Taurus but below S&W and Colt
@@0neDoomedSpaceMarine shot tons out of a 629. Shoots better than any Ruger or Taurus. Good woods gun.
@@darrengarcia4937 Well Colt is bankrupt, S&W is living off a practical but rather plain series of well-made carry automatics and revolvers (some of which I believe have even been adopted as service pistols), while Ruger is doing rather well with many well selling practical designs, from guns like the LCP, to the well-reviewed (although practically entry level as far as precisions go) Ruger Precision rifles and Ruger Precision rimfire (I own one, absolute tack driver), to it's AR series which is no slouch, to it's something like 60+ year production of the 10/22 and the .22 pistols it makes? How about that new, very well reviewed FiftySeven?
Just above a taurus? Dude, what are you saying? Ruger is killing it, has been for the last decade.
@@darrengarcia4937 Ruger produces quality firearms, "a step above Taurus" (y'know, guns that explode or go off unintentionally) is severely undervaluing them as a company
@@0neDoomedSpaceMarine Colt Anaconda. Buffalo Bore says as much.
Not a S&W tho.
What I learned from this video was that in the late '70s, at least among southern African practical shooters, the Smith & Wesson Model 59 was considered the best combat handgun in the world.
No those folk used Browning Hi-power or Colts and so on.
To be fair there are certainly worse pistols out there to use as a starting point. Like say this one. ;)
...this is Mamba number five
horrible ... but I still chuckled
Nah its 1..or 2... 3 4 5?
Horrible song, worse gun, bad pun.
@@jeffreyskoritowski4114 i liked that song lol but i was like 12
*151
And the day came whereupon Gun Jesus did sit down amongst the serpents and did hold a mamba within his hands. "Lord Gun Jesus, " cried his followers, "be ye not afraid that the serpent taken up thusly may bite thee?"
"No," spake Gun Jesus, "for this serpent is one of metal and is as dangerous and useful as is a scrotum upon a cow." And his followers did see the wisdom of his words and contemplated upon the scrotum burdened cow.
Yet one questioned Him thusly; "But Lord, thou art the Gun Jesus. Can you not turn this thing of crap unto a thing of firing fun-ness?"
Gun Jesus looked upon him and smiled upon him and it was as if the sun did rise for him, "No you tit," saith Gun Jesus, "I wouldst rather spend my time with the angel made Browning, Baretta, Smith and Wesson where it is known that ye can usually letteth rip more than 3 rounds before disappointment setteth in." And the one was chastened yet did he still follow Gun Jesus for He is good and righteous and he did know that he was a tit.
I fucking love this so much. Please make a bible!
I wish I could favorite this comment.
I'd pay you to make a gun jesus themed bible and read it
That was beautiful :)
I always read these in my head with the voice of that dude that reads the book of armaments when the holy hand grenade of Antioch is unveiled
Joe Hale seems like a less successful version of his brother Saxton
I bet his chest hair isn't even shaped like Australia.
He's probably not even Australian in the first place
Saxton Hale is a boss in tf2, joe hale is named after the tf2 hale vs game mode.
@@TheRoyaltyofTurtles WTF!
Mann Vs Machine
But the question is... does it beat the zip 22 as THE worst?
No the zip 22 is worse . It failed to even look like a gun and you have to put your finger in front of the gun to charge a round . This gun looks like a gun and doesn't require placing any part of your body in front of the weapon to operate .
Would that put the Rogak in 3rd place then? I'm not sure I can agree with that batting order. I don't think Ian would have even tried to fire the Rogak (I think he'd have deemed it unsafe). He did fire the Zip .22, and I think he'd be ok with firing this pistol.
I think this one barely qualifies as a "production" pistol due to the small numbers produced, therefore it's difficult to compare to something like the Zip 22. This is more like an extended marketing campaign based on a couple hundred prototypes.
Don’t forget the Nambu Type 94...
Where does cobray’s catalog rank? Oh and the early 1903s with exploding receivers
"The project went to New Jersey, and died. There are very few of these left." A tale as old as time, amiright? You can't make something better by making it in New Jersey.
where did that story come from? i nvr heard of nj being this bad...
... clearly you have never heard of this wonderful little place called Edison labs
@@crispyair3338 It's more of an exaggeration
From mob bodies and nuclear waste to doomed projects, NJ really is just a dumping ground.
If your S&W semi-auto needs a stunt double, get a Mamba.
Hey,what is on Darth's helm??
Yeah WHATS on his helmet
@@Dirtbag-Hyena it's a camo cover and bullets
After the Bush War, Joe Hale moved back to the United States and reentered the firearms industry under the name "Ron Cohen."
That's the only possible explanation for Kimber and Sig.
Good one!
Haha holy shit
@@justforever96 do you mean the P320s that shot people while holstered? Lol
@@shinobi-no-bueno sig p320 is much much better than Glock in modularity, trigger, accuracy, durability, and I've seen tons of negligent discharges from Glocks, actually my ex gf got shot by one. You have to pull the trigger to break down a Glock and it has no safety. Firing upon re-holstering is the only not dummy proof part of a striker design. I have fnx-45, fn 509, and a sig p320 with three different frames, one of which is metal. They are all SO much better than a glock
@@shinobi-no-bueno And one day if you ever carry a gun everyday you will soon see the merits of a striker fired pistol vs like a 3 pound steel 1911 with 8 shots
What a blast from the past! I worked in Rhodesia in 1977 and 1978 and I remember the media hype about the Mamba. I recall reading about it in a South African magazine called SCOPE. People were wild about the idea that they might be able to buy a pistol. There were NONE for sale in Rhodesia - I had picked up a Star Super-B 9mm in Johannesburg on my way to Rhodesia. When I left in 78 I sold it in Salisbury for a good deal more than I had paid. Great video.
I have a March 1978 issue of Guns & Ammo that reviews the Navy Arms Mamba. It says that almost everything is cast stainless steel including the barrel, and claims Navy Arms will import castings to be finished in the US. A quote from the article: 'The secret is in the heat treating of the cast barrels, and beyond that Navy Arms has nothing to say'. The author says he didn't test it thoroughly because it was a first prototype, but it appeared to be very reliable. Also stated is that the magazine holds 14 rounds, and the DA trigger weighed 22lbs!
Holy fuck! Are you supposed to use 2 fingers?
Large DA/SA semi-auto in 9x19, made almost entirely of castings (including the barrel), with a 15 round magazine? Sounds a lot like the Ruger P89, except that the P89 is actually a functional gun. 😂
I was about to say, p89 may be cast and ugly but it was my first semi auto I owned and I shot the crap out of it with everything I could find, hot hand loads, lead and even some Israeli Uzi surplus that was supposed to only be for smg and it never had a malfunction, I traded it later for a 92fs but it was definitely reliable and combat accurate lol
greg gentry - are there any Rugers that aren't awesome?
@@derekp2674 The Ruger P345 was severely lacking in awesomeness.
The P85 was definitely a turd. The P89 wasn't that much better.
The P90 in 45 was a whole different matter...ugly but VERY serviceable... Ironically
the "polymer" P95 as been a very good firearm to if bulky...
I used to have a mate who owned one of these, but I don't remamba his name.
Please don’t mamble, mate
Remambo number 5
"The Rhodesian Mamba review, but it doubles in speed every time Ian throws shade"
It lasts all of 36 seconds
@@eazy8579 0.36 actually
Sounds like a 'what if a random gun video's comment section designed a gun' story.
I recall reading any number of magazine articles about this "wonder pistol" and then nothing....The only modern pistol that got more attention than the Mamba was the Bren Ten.....And we know how that one worked out even with Jeff Cooper beating the drums for it.
The Bren Ten wasn't a bad or poorly designed pistol but getting spare mags was and still is nearly impossible. The gun really does work but it was poorly marketed (even though it was Sonny Crockett's gun of choice in the first season of "Miami Vice").
I carried a Bren 10 in Africa for years and I can assure you it's a fine piece of kit.
@@marvindebot3264 I cannot and would not argue the point with you. However, here in the U.S.A. it was a near total flop. I knew three or four people who purchased Bren 10s new in the box and all but one of them, a collector who is also an avid shooter, found their pistols to be unreliable due to poor or at least substandard quality. Problems with feeding and extraction, jamming (primarily smokestack jams) topped the list of failures associated with the pistols that I know of. All but one of the above-mentioned pistols were sold after multiple trips to quality gunsmiths failed to rectify the problems the original owners had with the. Two were replaced by CZ-75s and one by a Colt's in 10mm. The fourth pistol ended up in the owner's substantial collection as a "non-shooter" after he spent a LOT of money trying to get it up to a level of dependability that would have made it trustworthy as a daily carry pistol. I've always suspected that the Bren 10s that entered this country were, for some reason, ammo sensitive but since I only came close to buying one myself, I have no hand experience, except for a few rounds fired from the fourth pistol mentioned above two of which resulted in two smokestack jams out of a single magazine. IF I recall correctly Norma ammo was utilized at one time or another by all four owners and, compared to other 10mm ammo available at the time, was considered "warm enough" to cycle the action MOST of the time. Carefully crafted handloads brought the reliability up, on that fourth pistol, to around 90%. I must confess that even the least reliable of the Bren 10s I crossed paths with were very, very accurate when they worked. I came so close to buying a Bren 10 back then that I had made it a point to research a couple of holsters and even tracked down a reliable source for Norma ammo and two extra magazines but once the men I knew, who had far and away greater financial resources that I could lay claim to started having problems with their pistols I took a hard pass on a Bren 10 and purchased a "GI" Browning in 9mm (my least favorite but by far more abundant chambering and ammo).
Never mind that gun. I want to see a pan around that room
I did not catch the joke )=
To prevent cracking and breakage of cast parts, even some stamped parts, I grind and polish cast flash and sharp edges. I also do it for aesthetic purposes. It's unfortunate that most manufacturers don't use this practice, but it is labor intensive and greatly increases manufacturing costs. It is a task left to end users and rebuilders.
I don't really know anything about metallurgy, so the whole thing about the heat-treating cycle is flying over my head. Is a 24-hour cycle too long or too short? How does it affect/what does it have to do with the gun not working? In what specific way(s) does it "not work?" Basically, I think Ian left out a lot of important info on this one.
I think carburizing stainless is a lot harder than carburizing just steel. I heard carburizing steel is quite an easy process. Put the steel in a sealed container, heat it up to critical temperature and it's done. Green beetle channel demonstrated that quite a while ago. This process can "infuse" the carbon element up to 1 mm into the steel as far as I remember.
However, I doubt this carburizing procedure cause this gun not working properly. Nevertheless I had never own a gun and had never carburize steel before so don't count me on this one.
But I agree that gun jesus this time might cause me to have sleep deprivation due to this question.
Why the hell does this gun not work.
It all really depends on the base alloy. Carburizing is forcing carbon atoms into the spaces between the iron atoms to increase the hardness through diffusion. The time is only one piece of the equation temperature also matters. This can be very finicky as you end up with metal of different hardness and or microstructure. If not done properly you have a surface or area of depth that is either to hard and brittle or too soft and weak. Hope this clears things up a little.
@@justforever96 Most carburizing is done by heating components in either a pit furnace, or sealed atmosphere furnace, and introducing carburizing gases at temperature. Gas carburizing allows for accurate control of both the process temperature and carburizing atmosphere (carbon potential). Carburizing is a time/temperature process; the carburizing atmosphere is introduced into the furnace for the required time to ensure the correct depth of case. The carbon potential of the gas can be lowered to permit diffusion, avoiding excess carbon in the surface layer.
The 24 hours is critical because truncated Decarb begins well under 10 hours into the process, big fail.
@@justforever96 well metal can be too hard and shatter under pressure, or too soft and deform under pressure. Probably too hard in this case as i think the gun would still work if bits were slightly deformed with every use but just one shot and it shatters even one bit and obviously its not gonna work at all.
I think the issues with this are similar to the L85a1, in that the design itself is mostly sound with a few flaws, but the real issue is the method of manufacture, so things like an inadequately heat treated hammer or firing pin causing it to break, or things like brittle springs etc.
Basically, decent design, but poor manufacturing leading to parts that easily break or malfunction.
So, Lessons Learnt:
1. Never go away and actually build anything that got designed by a bunch of guys in a bar,
2. Never let a draughtsman double as a production engineer unless they're actually qualified to do so.
Who'd a thunk it?
Harold Weaver Smith, the draughtsman isn't the one who was insisting on the weird engineering decisions (regarding the heat treatment). I'd suspect he was actually more qualified than that guy.
3. Don't make semi-auto handguns out of metal that will gall.
More lessons:
a) the Browning Hi-Power wasn't so bad after all... (just look how widely it was used and for how long)
b) John Browning and Dieudonné Saive really were genius gun inventors.
1) It depends on who the guys at the bar are. IE, the Ferrari Dino project started as a bar conversation between Enzo Ferrari, Dino Ferrari and Vittorio Jano on what would have been the best angle between the banks of a V6 engine.
IRRC the M82 Barrett was the same, couple of guys drinking and someone said 'Bet you can't make a rifle that shoots .50', Ronnie Barrett decided it was a bet worth taking
This is the gun from far cry 2, I always thought that it was just a shitty design of a 1911
Brian Weydert well it is a shittier design of the 1911
I thought the FC2 pistol was a Spanish model 1911?
Holy hell it is
@@t.k.326
It was. A Star Model-P which is just a Spanish clone of the 1911.
I recall seeing a Mamba pistol approximately forty plus years ago in City Guns Hout Street Cape Town South Africa.
I think it was gold in colour and when I held it in my hand I noticed that the slide to frame fit was very loose.
Sounds like the Chevy Vega of the handguns. Started out with a great idea but ended up being poorly engineered and produced. Both were of similar time periods by the way.
yeah, there are four stages to design and production on which you can do a massive flop. 1. Market, 2. Design, 3. Technology, 4. Communication.
Arguably the 1,3 and 4 are the most important bits.
Excellent comparison.
IIRC, the Vega had an aluminum block. It was marketed well as they sold a bunch, but there was a a problem with step 2 -improper cooling and shifing cylindervsleeves.
Vegas are awesome. You throw out the anchor of an engine stuff in a hot small block and bam you have a deathtrap
I am one of the few people who got a good Vega. The worst problem I had with it was that the horsepower dropped to near zero when I would hit about 3,500ft above sea level. You know something is wrong when a VW microbus hauling a trailer can pass you but it made for some hilarious times wondering if we would make it to the top of a pass.
"I think it's worth pointing out that this is, in fact, objectively the INcorrect way to hold a pistol." Epic.
As Ian describes him, Joe Hale reminds me a bit of Malcolm Bricklin, whose eponymous '70s car company was basically the prototype for DeLorean (gull wings doors, massive government grant scams in a place where no reasonable person would build a car factory, and all), and who then went on to found YugoCars, Inc., the company that imported the Zastava Koral to the US, badged as the notorious Yugo. Mind you, Bricklin also founded Subaru of America, so, y'know, stopped clock twice a day and all that. But the whole "super-confident serial entrepreneur who lurches bombastically from disaster to disaster" thing sounds very similar.
I miss Lifesizepotato :( great video as always
Mátyás Pálffy What happened to life-size potato
So do I
Mátyás Pálffy he ran out of guns to talk about
he already review a revolver on Reddit
Today, the Mamba is a vary scarce pistol, for all the obvious reasons. Many thanks to the South African collection who provided this one for filming!
e ⬆ typo in the description. I'm surprised it hasn't been caught in all these years.
A justifiably forgotten weapon!
Most of what i hear in bars it's rubbish; even most of what i say in the bar it's also rubbish to be honest... i don't think that a bar is "the best place" to design a firearm.
I don't know about that, probably lots of lighters there and some vodka would set fire to your arms real nice.
The Marine Corps started in a bar. It seems to have worked out . I can't think of another example so it becomes more of the exception rather than the rule .
If I'm not mistaken, Gaston Glock started working on his pistol after some people made fun of him during a conversation at a cocktail party. Not a bar, but enough alcohol for some shit talking and Glock to get passed.
@ Dustin Eward: Word.
Dustin Eward or no friends...
At long last we see REALLY forgotten weapon.
Not to tell that I skip any gospel from Gun Jesus, but still...
Had they got the galling issue fixed it still would have been a flop. Look at the profile of the pistol; extremely high bore axis and almost square grip angle. That's a recipe for muzzle flip and I suspect discerning buyers would have dropped it pretty quick.
And, to think, this was created from a "best features ever" list by IPSC competitors. Field fillers, surely...
Ian, I remember reading about this when it was being developed, and much hype was made of the 2 and 3 round bursts, both claimed to be effective, by not climbing too far out of the center mass of a human target.
"in this case, I think it's to indicate three rounds successfully fired..."
SICK BURN!!!
"The project went to Nj and then died."
As someone who lives in Nj I can attest this is not uncommon lol.
I've heard of Ian mostly through other gun channels, and I have to say, I immediately love this guy. Great demeanor on screen, obviously very knowledgeable and VERY entertaining both through his thoroughness and obvious passion for the subject. Keep up the good work!!
A failed Rhosesian gun in 1979? All of Rhodesia failed in 1979!
My local gun shop in Johannesburg had a gold plated one for sale. Serial number 003 if I remember correctly. Nobody back then wanted to buy a gold paper weight. Took them ages to sell it. Wish I had bought it but I was young and broke.
I remember this horror story, didn't help using the same grade of stainless steel for all the parts! I'm in South Africa and I bought all the Man and Man Magnum magazines for over forty years...
I worked the first 30 years of my adult life in the electronics industry, and there were lots and lot of much-hyped epic failures. Marketing types are cast from the same mold, just different alloys. Some actually did not lie through their teeth, but these tended to be less successful -- failures were always the fault of the Engineers (of which I was one). The more things change the more they stay the same. zNice vidoe - Very Interesting!
While I never saw a Mamba in the wild, I did drool over the adds. I did, however around that time have a Smith Model 59 that I carried as a duty weapon. I liked the gun overall but the trigger pull was awful, that was why I sold it off and went to a 1911A1. So much easier with a single action cocked and locked .45ACP pistol, the trigger, of course on the 1911 was lovely and I did have an adjustable for over travel long trigger installed in the pistol that made it even better, and a flat mainspring housing with the nice Pacmayer grips to help with the recoil of the full house FMJ rounds that I fed her. The Dakota's offer an interesting place to carry a .45, the cold winters mean that most everyone you encounter that might need shooting have a LOT of cloths between them and the outdoors what with sub zero weather common in winter. So I figured FMJ would give better penetration when the snow flies, and even in summer the extra punch of a FMJ just sounded right to me. Perhaps it was my 8 years as a Soldier back in the 70's that added to this thought, plus I liked the added functionality of FMJ rounds while I saw some fellows with .45's feeding them hollow points have jam problems where I never had a burp giggle or fart out of my old war horses.
It is very, very *difficult* to re-heat treat any metal part after it has been initially carburized, annealed, tempered and whatever else this had done to it. It is _possible_ though, but you would probably have to go through several frames to get the process working properly.
"We made the best combat handgun ever!"
-ALL THE PARTS ARE CRUDE CASTS...
talk about ghetto...
"Normally, notches cut in a gun reflect kills. In this case, I think this means this has fired three shots successfully."... ROFL
In that era stainless steel guns, even revolvers (what few there available), were ALL prone to galling with any kind of prolonged use. Its taken decades to get the right combination of metallurgy and heat treating to get it right. Guns & Ammo magazine did a light-weight puff piece article on the Mamba, with no test firing. Everyone wanted one. Nobody could get them. So in the end, we all went back to shooting tricked out 1911's and hi-powers. Because that's all there was, if you were serious about combat pistol craft. Nobody shot Smiths (39's or 59's).
Funnily enough, one of the armoured vehicles Sandock-Austral ended up manufacturing was the Mamba Mk2 APC
Well vehicles were their forte!
And the Mamba Mk2 went on to be a quite successful design.. even made in the USA now.
Who the hell are these guys that created a list for an "ideal semi-auto" - that's made of CASTINGS instead of STAMPINGS???
And, they didn't even consider the truly superior, if completely unnecessary(I take it every idea in the list was completely unnecessary, sooo...), choice of them all - forgings???
It's like saying "I'm going to build the best engine ever - let's start with a cast crank, cast pistons, and cast rods!" - HUH???
I'm really REALLY into extremely weird, ridiculous, over the top, unnecessary, and even uniquely bad firearms(my dream arms collection would be a largely unshootable disaster of oddballs...), but I can honestly say that there is absolutely NOTHING redeeming about this. It isn't even noteworthy as a failure...
Among the desiderabile features of a firearm "no stamped parts" is probably at the bottom of the list. IE, in the same timeframe, the Benelli B76, that was a high quality firearm, with a competition-level trigger out of the box, had completely stamped frame and slide.
Yeah. Massive race to implement this amazing game-changing stamping technology a few decades before, and these guys are like "nah, we like the lower quality old expensive way better".
A race to the bottom fueled by hubris and ego. Giving control of technical details to a random jackoff worker who doesn't know what the hell he's doing is never a good idea.
Ironically, your description makes it quite appealing as a collector's item - the stupidest gun on earth. It's not stupid in any novel or interesting way, like the Zip22, and that just makes it even more stupid.
It looks like a S&W 645 but with a rounded trigger guard. The .45acp was very popular up until 2015 or so. Smith & Wesson had a few problems with the 645 but they were already going to roll out the 3rd gen lines in different calibers.
Have a 645 i bought when they first came out,other that a broken firing pin years ago never have had a problem.
I am subscribed to South African magazine Man Magnum you mentioned since 2003, it is a great magazine. They even published my letter on the Arisaka cartridge that my father had found in a garden. Now it is possible to get an electronic subscription. Regards from Yevgen, Ukraine.
I take it your father lives in Ukraine as well?
Yes, but he died this spring.
yevgenz Sorry to hear about that. Still an interesting find.
If I recall properly, the Add in Merc News said they would produce a "Black Mamba and a Green Mamba" I don't recall the differences other then the finish available on the guns though, wish I had my old copy. I never thought of merc work, sounded to off beat to me but I had a buddy who dreamed of it every day, and talked about it every damn time we were assigned to the same squad car.
Those angles and curves and very ugly, like what a Chinese S&W semi-auto pistol knockoff would look like if it would exist.
A sad reminder of how a great idea and some good planning can turn into a complete mess with only one or few mistakes.
STOP TEASING US LIKE THIS GUN JESUS. GIVE US THE G11.
On the wall behind you is a Walther P-38 with a "silencer" is that a 'Man from Uncle' Walther
*Suppressor*
@@Dirtbag-Hyena *silencer
Thank you for doing these, Ian. I think the only other place I've received this much gun knowledge is when I watch old episodes of American Rifleman/Tales of the Gun that use to come on the History Channel back in the day. They actually have full episodes all over UA-cam. Thanks again!
The Delorean of firearms! Even in the same time frame.
mcqueenfanman fd
Good analogy
Shoot it 88 times in an hour, you go back in time.
Maybe it's more suited to time travel
Might not be a good shooting weapon, but it looks heavy enough to be a bludgeoning weapon. Still kinda useful, I guess.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Heavy is good. Heavy is reliable...
Like a pocket tomahawk 😂
With a dull blade😆👏
@@JunkCCCP If it does not work you can always hit him with it.
So it's interesting how this thing's origin was essentially identical to that of the Fairbairn-Sykes Fighting Knife, except designed by people who don't actually know all that much about weapons beyond the very basics
I'm surprised that you say it didn't work, but don't give details. Was it just that nothing worked?
The 'galling'; Ian could have gone into a bit more detail, but stainless steel doesn't like to slide against itself under heat and pressure. With all-stainless guns, the slide and frame have to be heat-treated differently to prevent galling. Until this became practical, stainless autos were not practical. For their other issues, Colts got it right; my stainless Combat Commander has been flawless.
The normally separate pieces of the gun will spontaneously weld themselves together in small spots. Then when they are forced apart you're left with little tears and bumps in the parts' surface. Generally terrible.
I was just going to ask the same thing. The replies have been very informative, thanks!
Matt HW Thanks; I was at a loss how to describe the effect.
Great explanation
Thank you for hours of content gun Jesus. My favorite part of these videos is you can always tell how much disdain you have for elements of firearms you don't like and or that never worked but you still give massive amounts of unbiased information. Thank you Ian
So its likely close to being blister steel, it has cast parts and they probably werent heat treated right. That sounds really, really safe.
When you love Forgotten weapons and the algorithm pulls a "Mamba" out of context.
Lol RIP Kobe I guess.
So the mamba had the hype of Hudson with the quality of a Rogak... sounds lovely.
How did you come to do so many videos on South African weapons? You taught me as a South African more about local weapons than anybody else did. Really enjoy your videos and subscribed.
Ian was here a couple months ago.
big floppa
I'm curious what the final "best of combat pistols" list was, because this pistol seems to suggest "Model 59, but what if it had a trick safety lever, was made of cast stainless, and it didn't work?"
I recall seeing these as a full page (Back Page no less) Add on some Mercenary magazine that a buddy gave me years ago. Man I was drooling at the gun, thought it would be the best I could get by that add, thankfully I never got an opportunity to buy one, because I would have, I had a real knack for buying pretty much junk guns and thinking I had a collectors dream.
Wow, Gun Jesus is bringing the fire at 13:30.
Thanks for showing us this (thankfully) rare but interesting gun.
In the late 70s and early 80s everybody who started making all stainless steel Firearms with suffering exactly the same problems. You must use differential types of stainless. You cannot use the same type of stainless on parts that have to interact with each other. Stainless has a natural tendency to gall especially against another piece that has to interact with it that is also the same type of stainless. It was a learning cycle in Metallurgy at that time.
Some people even had the bright idea to soak their firearms down in WD-40 before they went into a shooting match. That only ended up with guns locked in mid cycle and unable to be disassembled because WD-40 is not a lubricant, it is a solvent
Loved it especially since I am originally from N. J. New to guns so to hear there is a gun manufacturer in N. J. Is pretty cool.
Always love your stuff, Ian. Your knowledge is encyclopedic, and you have a very engaging presentation style.
very cool
Good ending: Ian decides to fix the Mamba, and shoots it
Bad ending: Ian decides to shoot the Mamba without fixing it, the slide exploding off and hitting him in the nuts
True ending: Ian never shoots it, it was never meant to be shot
You know it's a good video when it starts with what sounds like a bad joke. "So two guys are sitting in a bar in Rhodesia..."
Turns out it was a bad joke. All of it. This gun didn't even stop firing with certain ammo, or in certain environments. It's truly a failure when you can pull it straight out of the box and have it misfire on its maiden cartridge.
Who else Is up at 6am to watch Gun Jesus
2pm in here ;-;
its close to 5am for me
5am here, school in 3 hours...
Me me me!
Yep me!
I remember this pistol well. Joe Hale was quite a character, if you're interested in Rhodesia and his adventures he wrote a book "Red Zambezi" there's a lot more to him than this failed attempt at pistol manufacture.
Yeah, like another comment that he went to the USA and completely changed his name. (:-)
worst pistol in the world?
*zipper malfuction simulating device flashback*
I remember pictures of that gun on magazines of the day. As an aside, I bought an Egyptian Hakim from a fellow who said it belonged to Val Forgett of Navy Arms. I don't know whether he was telling the truth or not but it was the nicest Hakim I ever saw and I no longer own it.
I'm a professional heat treater and let me tell you carbarizing stainless steel is a bad idea
Very interesting, thanks man. I actually live in Harare, Zimbabwe (formerly Salisbury, Rhodesia).
Strange. Usually Rhodesian and South African designs tend to be very practical. Here they go to all that effort for an overengineered pistol and mess it up with the manufacturing. A pity the AMerican production never took off. It would have been interesting so see if a properly made weapon would have worked. Still, even looking just at the design, what's so special about it? They could have bought any number of existing guns with pretty much the same features.
The primary reason for all of these practical Rhodesian and South African designs they were under embargo by the west. They could not legally buy arms from any western manufacturers.
One side note I'd like answered is what is the deal exactly with the CZ 75 having been so popular in South Africa and Rhodesia, despite it being a Czech (or Czechoslovakian then) gun that obviously was from a Warsaw Pact country?
I've heard Rhodesians bought their CZ 75s in South Africa, but why were recently-designed Eastern Bloc pistols being sold to South Africa at a time when much of the world and especially the Communist world had an embargo on South Africa and condemned their government so publicly?
AFAIK they were legit CZ 75s (and being so recent I can't imagine there was much time to have good-quality reproductions made elsewhere), so did Czechoslovakia just not care as long as they got the money and for some reason Warsaw Pact countries weren't actually prohibited from selling arms to a direct enemy of the Soviet Union?
seanseanston The Czechs were noted for selling guns to just about anyone during the Cold War as they were one of the more independent of the Warsaw Pact Nations. Somewhat like the Yugoslavians but the Czechs remained in the Soviet Sphere due to them being invaded.
Interesting, thanks for that. One of those minutiae that can be very hard to find the answer for if you don't ask somebody directly.
Zastava is understandable since Yugoslavia was outside the Warsaw Pact, but it's very interesting that it seems Warsaw Pact countries were more independent in their foreign policy than you'd think, considering they were selling to direct ideological enemies of the USSR.
It does remind me of something I saw lately though in that show Deutschland 86, where it focuses on the historical dealings East Germany did selling weapons to South Africa. I suppose the USSR realized that money from arms deals could be lucrative and maybe it would be against their long-term interests to deprive their satellite states of money they could use to stave off economic problems?
Ian the Mamba was never touted as a weapon for the military.. in the field and in combat over the 1970 - 80 period we used Brownings, Barettas (branded as Vektor), CZ and a few old Colt pistols in this order .. all struggled with the fine dust in the bush and required lots of cleaning and oiling to be reliable and safe.
Sandock never produced any firearms of note for SANDF but we're HUGE and world class in armoured vehicle production
A working home production handgun would have held obvious advantages for countries with international arms embargoes against them. Why they chose stainless steel castings for a gun that was not going to have much in the way of sales outside the area is a mystery. Selling a gun with poor rifling as a feature is kind of an uphill battle in the best of times.
Freedom Group owned Remington is now making ACRs that have barrels working loose after a mag or two, resulting in a failure to feed along with a redesigned safety selector that uses screws, which also loosen and back out.
How long before the Remington ACR is on Forgotten Weapons?
this reminds me of the guy in africa that build a shed out of wavey sheetmetals. called it a controlroom. and now they try to build airplanes out of heavy steelbeams. motorized with a bikeengine. they crashed every time(of course!) the goal is to set up an international airport....
Casting "flash" is the term for where the two(+) mould parts meet and there is some excess. It is also called "flashing".
So what did the heat treating actually do to the gun? Having trouble imagining what "not working at all" even looks like in the case of a gun. It wouldn't even fire a shot? Wouldn't reload properly? What was it?
Ever heard of Hege Waffen in West Germany?
I bought one of these pistols for my wife. It was a copy of a Walther PPK and of high quality manufacture. The one I bought was chambered for 380 ACP and the mag held 8 rounds. A very nice carry gun.
Wish I had never sold it, and have never seen the make again anywhere - maybe do a run down by FW on these, they seem to be well "forgotten"!
That was fun watching as always!:) I don't know about how guns work at all (I really should do some study, I know), but I like to learn about the history behind them. Cheers!
Glad you got to show this thing off, I've never seen one in person.
Hey Ian,
I would like to know more about what pistols were actually used in the Rhodesian Bushwar. Thanks Steve
Hi Ian, What is the long serial # on the chamber at 8.25. You did not mention its significance, if any? Thank you.
I've noticed when a gun manufacturer says "We are creating the best ...." It going to suck.
I like how the gun looks. Wonder if one could get a hold of the scematics and actually build it right and functional, in a production setting rather than handmade
@@justforever96 Im a hobbyist gunsmith lol. Building it myself is just for fun
God I miss Navy Arms in Ridgefield NJ. It was a little storefront on their warehouse stuffed to the rafters with surplus arms. Mausers and SMLEs and everything else you could imagine. Sigh
Those three marks on the grip are for Monster Energy Drink company.
Years ago Sarco was selling these. Was tempted but knew nothing about them. Havent given them any thought till seeing your video.
After maybe 12ish videos I can say this. You sir are one knowledgeable guy.
Is there an actual gun that promised to be "the best ever" that actually delivered something else than besides a fully flawed end product?
It seems that whenever gun producers hoped to overachieve or make a simple non-great weapon, they actually created the opposite
Any reference on stainless steels such as the Carpenter Steel Blue Book will tell you that you use different hardness or heat treat will prevent some galling of stainless.
Surgical instrument designers deal with those issues everyday.
For the most part you are better off designing pistols out of carbon steel.
Another case of money not equaling brains. As far as I can tell, the only things that this pistol has that other, better guns do not, is that totally superfluous "safety" feature where you have to pull back on the hammer to engage the safety, and that overly complex adjustable mainspring. Man, people like Joe Hale (however it's spelled) are the modern incarnations of snake oil salesmen... and I mean that in the most insulting, degrading way.
... But another wonderfully fascinating video by Ian. Thank you for entertaining and informing us! Oh, and I think I have ALWAYS learned something new whenever I have watched one of your many epic videos! 😁👍