N R Dongre vs Whirlpool Corp | Satyam Infoway vs Sifynet Solutions | Balakrishna Hatcheries vs Nando

#trademark
00:00 - 09:45 Theory for Exams
09:45 - 13:42 NR Dongre Summary
13:42 - 15:04 Satyam Infoway
15:04 - 20:42 Balakrishna Hatcheries vs Nandos
20:42 - 23:05 Health & Glow vs Dhiren Paul
British Sugar Plc vs James Robertson & Son Case Summary
Health and Glow Retailing Pvt. Ltd vs Dhiren Krishna Paul Case Summary
#healthandglowvsdhirenkrishnapaulcase
Definitions/Meaning of: ‘Mark’ S.2(1)(m); ‘Trade mark’ S.2(1)(zb); ‘Service’ S.2(1)(z);
‘Goods’ S.2(1)(j); ‘Package’ S.2(1)(q); ‘Well known trade mark’ S.2(1)(zg), Need for
Protection of Trademarks, Registered and Unregistered Trade Marks
Use of trade mark on goods/services- S.2(2)(b) & (c), 29(6)
Use in Advertisements -declared as use and ground for protection even without goods/services
N. R. Dongre v. Whirlpool Corporation, (1996) 5 SCC 714
Protecting Domain Names as Trade Marks
Satyam Infoway Ltd v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd, AIR 2004 SC 3540
Trademark for Services
Balakrishna Hatcheries v. Nandos International Ltd 2007
Health and Glow Retailing Pvt. Ltd v. Dhiren Krishna Paul, Trading as
Health and Glow Clinic,2007(35) PTC 471(Mad)
#trademarklaw
#trademarkact
Trademark Act Landmark Cases
Trademark Law Landmark Cases