Plane Engine Falls Apart Mid-Flight
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 січ 2023
- Enjoy this episode of 3 Minutes of Aviation!
✈ SOURCES / FURTHER INFORMATION
Japan Airlines Boeing 777 mid-flight engine failure
• JAL904便 飛行機事故 離陸から緊急着陸...
Blue Angels diamond formation after takeoff
• Blue Angels Diamond Bu...
Japan Airlines Boeing 777 crosswind landing
• 40万回再生 ❣ 片車輪着陸！エンジンが！横...
GOL Boeing 737-800 engine failure during takeoff
• DEU UMA PANE NO MOTOR ...
Cessna bounced landing with pilot induced oscillation
Video by Adam F.
✈ BECOME PART OF THE CHANNEL
Merch Store - teespring.com/stores/3-minute...
✈ CONTACT ME
Submit videos, give feedback, ask questions - 3minutesofaviation@gmail.com
If you liked the video, please subscribe and turn on notifications - I appreciate it! - Наука та технологія
I may be wrong but doesn't an uncontained engine failure refer to a fan blade or disc separation that breaches and escapes the engine casing? That just looks like a loose cowling.
According to Aviation Safety Network and other sources, it was in fact a separation and breach. “The initial inspection after landing reveals that two fan blades were broken away from the root and from the middle, respectively, and a part of fan case is missing. Left aft fuselage was also damaged for 30 cm, along with the leading edge of the left horizontal stabilizer.”
(JAL flt 904, 04 Dec 2020. Registration JA8978, B772 MSN 27637, delivered to Japan Air System in 1997. The engine was a PW4074).
It’s not loose, it’s entirely gone. You can see after they land.
@@GalootWrangler Agree, but the video title "falls apart" is clickabit.
@@bobjohnson6217 it kind of did
Vibration is indicative of unbalanced turbine, which could be an uncontianed failure
1:50 That was a very impressive landing!
But I wouldn't call it "a stabilized approach" ... why not go around?
Not at all, they should have gone around.
@@stefanschneider3681 How is it not a stabilized approach? The only thing wrong with it was landing on the downwind main gear.
@@quazz79 Landing from the downwind side’s main gear was good solution to stabilize the posture smoothly after landing.
@@tomcater777 no actually you should land on the upwind landing gear. It was a left crosswind, so a proper sideslip would be to touchdown on the left main gear while using right rudder to keep the nose straight
Well done JAL. That was an incredible landing.
It was like watching 170 tons of exquisite ballet.
well done JAL. You're over working your engineers to the point of live failure.
That was pretty horrible. He was holding left rudder in the flare when he should have been holding right. He had the nose too high and did not have enough aileron into the wind. He landed sideways.
Japan airlines having a rough 3 minutes
Lmao imagine just sitting casually and looking out the windows and you see parts of the engine falling out 💀
Blue angels take-off? Seen it dozens of times ... AND LOVE IT ANYWAY 😅! Amazing control this close to the ground 👍
The last one reminded me of being a passenger in with a mate who was building his hours up in a small Cessna like that one. We spent the day flying around. Anyway, when we got back to the airport, there were 17-knot crosswinds. It's always an 'interesting' landing when your pilot goes "Woah!" when you bounce the first time. He got it sorted so it was a good landing.
Its fulfilling when it's tricky.
Of course it was a good landing .............. you are here to tell the tale afterwards.
@@sheerluckholmes5468 Exactly
The landing in the video would have been easier if the pilot had used a lower flap setting. The 172 doesn't like strong crosswinds with full flaps.
I was just reading about the Blue Angels on Wikipedia yesterday, the "diamond pattern" photo there shows them *much* closer. In this video they're still climbing and getting into position, while in the photo the wingtip-to-canopy separation is 18 inches (< 50 cm), insanely close! I also read something I didn't know: they don't use G-suits, instead they've developed muscle contraction techniques to avoid blood pooling down their legs during high-G maneuvers. G-suits actually interfere with their flying technique, as they rest their right arms on their thighs and the suit bladders inflating and deflating would make this impossible.
Those guys are athletes.
There's a tryout video where they also mention they have additional spring tension on the controls to limit movement and putting a prospect on a gym machine to make sure they can hold their arm against the force for a specific duration.
@@ROGER2095 and gals!
They didn’t develop G straining or muscle clenching. All fighter pilots do those maneuvers, Gsuits just make those things easier and more effective.
It does mean, however, that they have to be better and more physically fit than other pilots.
@@tylerfb1 Sorry I didn't mean that they invented these techniques, they just _use_ these techniques and refine them to find what works for them. The main point they mention about G-suits (in their FAQ) is that the G loads are known in advance when they fly, unlike in a combat situation where a pilot might have to execute sharp and unpredictable maneuvers. As they put it: "Anticipating the changes in gravitational forces allows the Blue Angels demonstration pilots to combat G-forces with muscle contractions".
The tensioned spring mentioned above is also explained in the same section: "the Blue Angels have a spring tensioned with 40 pounds of pressure installed on the control stick that gives the pilot a 'false feel'. This allows the pilot minimal room for un-commanded movement."
Kudos to the pilot of the 777 landing in those Narita crosswinds. Those were some great skills on display.👍
Except it touched down on the wrong gear. Bad skills.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 what are you even talking abt what wrong gear
@@ChunkyLlama001 left crosswind, u are supposed to touch down with the left main gear first. He/she landed on the right side first. Wrong side.
@@ChunkyLlama001 PIC drops upwind wing to maintain centerline, touches down on the upwind gear, unrolls airplane to touch down on the downwind gear, maintains centerline with rudder, then lowers the airpane down onto the nosegear. Airplane maintains centerline the entire landing with very lttle yaw.
That last landing, the right thing to do is GO AROUND! Pilot's lucky not to have bent the airplane coming down on the nosewheel...
It is, but after the 4th time with worsening winds that are out of limits your next one may be much worse.
He needs more x wind training. Full flaps are BAAAAD
CP 50 yrs here.
That Cessna landing is me everytime on MS Flight Simulator!
Love the Blue Angels! Have seen them on multiple occasions and always left in awe of their abilities!
Hey! Love your airplane videos ❤
Another great 3 mins of entertainment as always 👏
As always: the shortest 3 minutes on UA-cam. Great content, time flies.
Thanks including my video at the of the Cessna 182 bouncing at the end! I wish I could have filmed it in landscape mode for y’all. On this day, there were literally only two departures and landings during my shift (I’m a line service technician). Not a day you’d ever catch me ever flying in. I knew it be an interesting landing, and it sure was. The biggest factor in the multiple bounces, in my humble opinion, was the pilot using full flaps. He came in fast too. 10 degrees, or maybe 20 at most, as well as a slower speed could have prevented this.
when was it filmed? I just visited the Hiller Aviation Museum 2 days ago, so cool for it to show up on 3 minutes of aviation right after!
Film in landscape next time! Good Lord man!
Kidding. 😉
20 degrees is ideal for the 172/182 in gusting winds. I just landed at VNY today with 25G35 using 20 flaps and buttered it on the aiming points because of the configuration lol
Yup full flaps is a recipe for disaster on a gusty day. I used to come in hot no flaps slip it if cross wind and plant it on the runway. Not messing around with gust of 27 knts
@@kapilk1644 about 2 weeks ago during the storms we had
Thank you for sharing.The Captain or First Officer on that 777 with the cross wind and flung side ways still wanted to land.✈✈✈
It was a controlled input by the pilot. In a crosswind you want the landing gear on the upwind side to touch first.
I am sorry.with the "flung" term! The typing fast is crazy sometimes. I meant to say "flying" sideways.😊
Hey thanks for the extra 1 second!!!
Great channel 👍
I’m always wowed when the camera is in a position to see just how much rudder the demo pilots, in this case the Blue Angels, use! That bottom airplane came all the way over from the far right with nothing but rudder! Amazing.
Anyway, props to 3moA as always - truly the ristretto of aviation channels!!
Well put!
Even with a broken engine those 777 are beautiful! Unless that 172 was at full capacity I would have skipped the flaps on a windy day
From inside the plane the engines look small, but when it showed the damage on the outside and the people standing next to it, you really get a grasp on how huge the engines are. Also, it's a good habit to avoid sitting in line with the turbine section of the engine. Lot's of blade failures end up sending debris into the plane!
Love your videos!
Thank you for the video 👍🇦🇺
I did eight touch and go's in a 150 at the end of training with a 23-25kt quartering crosswind. He had wanted me to do ten, but I was absolutely done mentally and I was soaked in sweat on a cold day. Hated it, but glad I did it.
Now you owe us 9-1=8 seconds of aviation🙂
interesting as always thank you !
hi! i really like the videos. Could you please tell me the music you use for the intro and for the end of the video?? I would really like to have it
That diamond formation at takeoff.. skill!
Thank you Three Minutes of Aviation!
01:20 This is how the 'Darkstar' blew the roof off the guard post in Top Gun Maverick. In real life an FA-18 did a high speed low altitude transition. Pilot says it blew the whole set to pieces not just that roof 😎
That Blue Angels clip was great!
Nice vid!!
Great video!
JAL's crosswind landing was smoother than many Ryanair landings on calm days ... just sayin'.
😅😅😅😅😅 I laughed way to hard at thsi
You should compare it to Lion Air's landings.
Should change the name approximately Three Minutes Of Aviation
The 182 performed an impressive PIO.
That Cessna kinda reminds me of a fish bobbing in and out of water❤❤❤😂
2:40 I remember the same thing happened with my brother when he was landing a Cessna that he had rented with my father and I in the plane, super heavy winds, we had tried to go through or around a storm and we weren't able to so we had to turn around and go back, my brother is a fantastic pilot and even though it bounced due to how harsh the weather was moving us around, he was still extremely frustrated with the hard landing, and he wanted to make it much smoother obviously, which made me respect him as a pilot even more because he wanted to provide his passengers with the smoothest ride even when the conditions were making that hard to impossible
BEAUTIFUL
For those pontificating about what did (or did not) happen, a few minutes research would have established that the JAL Boeing 777-200 engine failure occurred as long ago as December 2020. Photos showed that a couple of fan blades (or portions thereof) were missing. The effect of the resultant fan unbalance, causing vibration throughout the airframe, was clearly apparent in the video clip.
However,, to describe the engine as falling apart was over-sensationalising what was, nevertheless, a serious event. It did not appear to be an "uncontained failure", as the the 'Kevlar'(?) containment ring around the fan casing was intact. The cowling would have been dislodged by the release of the fan blades and shock load of their impact on the fan casing and the subsequent vibration, not by debris penetrating the fan casing.
Following this event and another similar event in the USA, JAL retired its P&W-powered B.777-200 aircraft later that year.
Having landed with the Santa Anas in a 172, I know exactly what that 182 was feeling.
Kudos to all pilots for safely landing their aircraft. Landing a C182 in strong winds is amazingly difficult. Worst I ever tried was 18kts. Love seeing the majestic Blue Angels.
I think the 'wrapper ' came off. No issues with the contents?
Is it engine cowl damaged?
JAL pilot did a masterful job with that crosswind landing.....BRAVO!!
Cover separated, not the fan itself, or?
Now *that's* a diamond slot formation!
Glorious
1:22 hey that’s the town where I live and I saw those jets! Btw I’m subscribed
Good job, guys!
Was there a Bill Shatner recording in that first clip?
That last Blue Angel taking off, sticking low to the ground and then playing with the throttle to get back and into formation so low to the ground. That is some tricky flying he is pulling off there.
As others here opined; engine cowl latching is the likely root cause of this failure. In the failure analysis; suggest reviewing ATA 54 maintenance history and last three engine cowl open/close events. Expensive 'human factors' outcome. Thanks for posting.
3 min of aviation has 333k subs. Crazy.
Did the pilot of that Cessna 182 log that as 3 touch and go landings and one full stop?!
4 hours ago uploaded gratefully I trust my own instinct that not to fly for the next half year at least
Goooo Navy. I was stationed at El Centro for a bit before going to NAS Oceana in Virginia Beach..
Had something similar happen on a flight from Italy to the USA in the late 1950s. Our no.3 engine caught fire and while the fire was extinguished we hit a rough patch shortly after and the whole dang thing fell off the wing. We ended up landing in Newfoundland and was stuck there for 4 days while they got us a new engine. Would send a diff plane....A NEW ENGINE!
That JAL pilot put on a Xwind landing clinic. About as perfect as you will ever see.
Not really. Touched down on the wrong gear. 🤷🏻♂️
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 No he did not. He touched down on the upwind gear. That is how you do it.
@@wntu4 LOL. He touched down on the downwind gear. The wind came from the left. He touched down on the right gear.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 The plants and his wing says otherwise.
@@wntu4 he is crabbing to the left. The airplane weathervanes into the wind. The plants means absolutely nothing that low to the ground.
He pressed the wrong rudder pedal and made it worse, hence the dropping of the right wing. It’s a bad technique. After touchdown, the nose comes to the right. If u touch down on the right gear, the nose should either be aligned or slightly to the right and coming left.
If u read other comments, everybody else also thinks it’s a left crosswind. You are the only one that thinks it’s a right crosswind.
The blue angels formation is like the voltes v formation
JAL is the new Aerosucre?
This is like a video collection of Boeings greatest engine failures for January 2023.
What's up with the 777-200 and the uncontained engine failure? United had two same instances with its 777-200.
Why some of these emergency can't be seen in flightradar24?
It was a bit crack coz of winds.. no need to worry about it...
He gave us an extra 1 second of aviation 🎉
I think the main reason that Cessna bounced so much is because he came in too hot. Looks like that to me anyway. The plane wanted to keep flying due to excess speed and flaps staying down. One thing I used to do on my Cherokee when landing was to retract the flaps immediately after the wheels touched. That decreases lift, and puts more weight on the wheels (oleo struts also absorb more shock without bouncing) for more effective braking and she never bounced. The Cessna has a disadvantage as it has spring steel gear (easier to bounce) and the flaps are electric which makes them much slower to retract. On a Cherokee, the flaps are directly mechanical and can be brought up in a fraction of a second.
Um, this video is 3 minutes and BUT ONE second! This isn’t 3 minutes of Aviation!! 🤓
Joking I love the channel keep up the amazing content
Nice surf
great one ...
You land a 182 that hot, you're going to get a bunch of float and bounce.
Better than losing all your airspeed in gusting wind that strong, though.
I read this in Fluttershy voice
@@JaidenJimenez86 Been there, done that. Also not fun.
THAT was forcing it onto the ground, could have severed the nose gear
Was the cessna pilot charged for 4 landings?
Nightmare leavin the bonnet open😮
1:25 those GE90s sound like straight BEASTS
The Cessna didn't need full flaps going into winds that strong.
He finally gave us 10 seconds of aviation.
I’m just glad the engine on the triple seven fixed itself after they touched down.
The audible engine failure sounded like a compressor stall?
That 182 had way too much flaps in for that wind. Plus too much speed. Those float like crazy.... With a strong gusty wind, zero or 10 degrees is all you need.
Was just thinking that as I was watching it.
In recent years, haven't seen THIS difficult a crosswind situation handled this well, by the cockpit crew.. as can be seen in this landing in Narita.
Hat's off the the pilots and crew.
.
Also the severity of the damage on the 777-200 at Okinawa, as can be seen in the aftermath video.. simply makes us wonder with awe.
... as to how far humanity and especially Homo sapiens have come.
We never know how unimaginable things might be.. in the coming 10000-20000 years!
.
Watch a video of pilots landing at WLG. It's like this about six months of the year.
Why don’t ppl realize this was a wrong technique? U don’t touch down first on the downwind gear. Very easy to get a wing strike.
I was taught not to land with or full flaps in gusting conditions in small fixed winged aircraft. Is it not taught anymore?
An inspection/maintenance panel flipped up, not optimal, and defiantly scary if you are watching it but... as you see not an issue.
wrong read the JTSB report.
You missed the part where the engine was vibrating wildly and a fan blade punched through the containment system? Meets the definition of a serious incident.
We are seeing way to many engine issues like this and worse in the last few years. The most famous prob being the QANTAS A380 incident.
That Cessna a) probably should have gone around and b) should not have had so much flap in with that much crosswind
1 second extra this week ⏰
1:54 Samurai pilot skills 😮
*_Former Boeing Everett.... 777 can safely fly and land with 1 engine. It has to meet 1 Engine Test to fly over open water._*
If 777 loses 1 engine over the ocean, it will either continue to nearest airport for emergency landing, or turn around and fly to nearest airport for emergency landing. It depends on which airport is closer or safer to make emergency landing. With only 1 engine, 777 has less reverse thrust available to help slowing down aircraft after landing.
777 can travel a long ways with NO engines. It has a glide slope of 17:1 to 20:1. If 777 is at 35,000 feet and loses both engines, it can glide 17 x 35,000 = 595,000 feet or 595,000 / 5,280 = 112 miles. If 20:1 then 20 x 3500 / 5280 = 132 miles.
*_Chance of losing both engines on a 777 is very small... that is why it is allowed over open water..._*
It take a lot of skill to do those aerial acrobatics!
"Uncontained engine failure". The aviation world has some of the funniest technical euphimisms.
Wonder if the Cessna got invoiced for multiple touch and go's :D
Damn, the Blue Angels are pretty good at flying.
LOL i used to always fly into Naha airport in Okinawa. i was there when the China Airlines flight blew up in i think 2007? i was still a child then but wow i remember how terrible that event was
Not a second more, or a second less!
Ayo thumbnail got me thinking my airliner was taking off the carrier 😂😂
We owe you 1 second of aviation
Nope, we are stillowed 8 seconds from the last video...
this is some great videos 3 minutes of aviation is making PLUS there only THREE MINUTES!
That crosswind looked just a little risky.
Using flaps especially full flaps during strong cross winds isn't a good idea as that last 182 found out.
That crosswind landing was a buttclencher but damn that pilot is skilled AF!