BACK TO BASIC - INTERPOLATION

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @DiAshTray
    @DiAshTray 7 місяців тому +1

    Never used it before, and never knew the use of it, but now I'm going to keep my eye on it. Thanks man.

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  7 місяців тому +1

      Give it a try 👍

  • @TiagoSantos-ls9ze
    @TiagoSantos-ls9ze 4 роки тому +5

    Amazing, I always looked to this tool and thought "what that thing do?", Thank u, very much

  • @yongmsong
    @yongmsong 4 роки тому +11

    Didn’t know you can do the retrospective reconstruction for interpolation. Thanks always for awesome practical videos!

    • @melisahensley7962
      @melisahensley7962 Рік тому

      For real, the practice videos are extremely helpful. Interpolation was amazing!! The fine detail difference was crazy!!!!

  • @bronevichok0507
    @bronevichok0507 4 роки тому +2

    You blow my mind! Thanks! Yes, use it for making images sharper if I don"t have time for increasing matrix size

  • @mihaimoldo
    @mihaimoldo 2 роки тому +1

    So there's no drawback to using it. Awesome!
    Thank you for the content Bac. Love every one of your videos.

  • @حبالنبيباتباعسنته-ص8ج

    Amazing. Mind blowing.
    Keep it up.
    Mohamed from SUDAN.

  • @ping700
    @ping700 4 роки тому +3

    Yes we do use interpolation when scanning

  • @72DIMOS
    @72DIMOS 4 роки тому +4

    Always using it, especially when I don't use sguere matrix

  • @JC-ru3mo
    @JC-ru3mo 4 роки тому +2

    Great video. Thank you. 😎

  • @scottgloverjohnson
    @scottgloverjohnson 3 роки тому +3

    Pretty much always use interpolation in - plane; I believe GE turns out on automatically for any frequency /read matrix above 256. Never liked the look of through-plane/slice interpolation though, UNLESS the acquisition is going to do reformats. Seen a lot of protocols with slice interpolation on like a 6-7mm slice, just never looked good to my eye.

  • @badrlinux6786
    @badrlinux6786 4 роки тому +2

    that’s what I call a fine
    job 👌 keep it up bro🐱‍🏍

  • @davidbrown7932
    @davidbrown7932 3 роки тому +2

    Wow great job Bac your presentation is amazing fantastic 🙏

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  3 роки тому +2

      Thanks for kindly words.

  • @Adam-o4h
    @Adam-o4h Рік тому +1

    OK! Thanks for your Videos! Why shouldn't I always use interpolation? What is the disadvantage? Or, for what kind of sequenzes it is not good?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Рік тому +1

      From my experience I use it wherever I can.

  • @TheM55m
    @TheM55m 4 роки тому +1

    Nice video 👍 i am from Saudia Arabia

  • @agniredfieldmusic
    @agniredfieldmusic 3 роки тому +2

    Amazing video!

  • @bism_allah
    @bism_allah Рік тому

    بارك الله فيك ان شاء الله 🤍

  • @babjigandi9548
    @babjigandi9548 3 роки тому

    What does interpolation (2,2),(3,3) upto (6,6) means?If we increase this order do we get good image?and does it take more time if we do with (6,6).What range is enough actually?

  • @diyarphysicist7141
    @diyarphysicist7141 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you

  • @joedh1988
    @joedh1988 4 роки тому +1

    Great video. Also didn't know about the retrospective recon, very handy. Bit off topic, but could you retrospectively recon a sequence from say non fat saturated sequnce to fat saturated using this method?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  4 роки тому +1

      No, this I don’t think it’s possible.

    • @iansze2652
      @iansze2652 2 роки тому

      I think you can only recon the raw/scanned images only....if fat sat (or any other scan sequence modification) was not applied during the scan, you cannot reconstruct it

  • @babjigandi9548
    @babjigandi9548 3 роки тому +1

    That’s fine if interpolation 1 means it’s turned off and 2 is on.Can you please tell it for 3,4,5,6 what does they do.will be waiting for your answer
    Thank you 🙏🏻

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  3 роки тому +1

      2 means it’s double. So having 256 it will be 512. 3,4,5 shouldn’t be play around with. Means you double it even more. And that just messing with everything.

  • @SuperMusammil
    @SuperMusammil 4 роки тому +2

    Nice. First comment

  • @no-de3lg
    @no-de3lg 4 роки тому +3

    Your video awesome thanks really but what it really means interpolation?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  4 роки тому +1

      Good question. Please check this link for further understanding: mri-q.com/zip.html

  • @gulnaragayeva170
    @gulnaragayeva170 3 роки тому +2

    👍👍👍

  • @abrabr6720
    @abrabr6720 Рік тому +1

    I see you using “copy image position” what does it do . Thank you

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Рік тому +1

      It’s more like copying the image where you at. So you don’t have reposition etc. Doing this the new plan of yours will align at same position as the one you position. Please try it out and you will understand more of it. I use it all the time for planning. Being able to work faster and more efficient.

    • @abrabr6720
      @abrabr6720 Рік тому +1

      @@Nguyen_MRI will certainly do try it. Thank you so much for a quick response. Please keep going nothing is simple or difficult in MRI all important. Always looking forward to seeing your videos

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Рік тому +1

      @@abrabr6720 awesome. Yes it’s try and fail all the time. Nothing is more important to share the knowledge in the community. More videos will come. Stay tuned 👍

    • @abrabr6720
      @abrabr6720 Рік тому

      @@Nguyen_MRI looking forward

  • @nileshraval8295
    @nileshraval8295 3 роки тому +2

    Can you make video for chemical shifting artifact c spine region t1 fs sequnse, how to reduce .please can u explane sir

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  3 роки тому +3

      Thanks for comment. There is no chemical shift artefact on fatsat sequences because you already suppressed the fat. Please read more here: mriquestions.com/chemical-shift-artifact.html

  • @23232Bing
    @23232Bing 4 роки тому +2

    Second comment!

  • @patrickivancruz1421
    @patrickivancruz1421 2 роки тому

    Hi,
    How can I see the reconstructed images on the viewing mode after creating? I can’t open it :(

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  2 роки тому +1

      Should be in the browser like the rest of the other sequences.

    • @patrickivancruz1421
      @patrickivancruz1421 2 роки тому

      Thanks for your help! :) another question? Is there any possibility to retrieve deleted images in siemens scanner?

  • @Kareem-Yuji
    @Kareem-Yuji Місяць тому +1

    What,s the name in Phillips

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Місяць тому

      @@Kareem-Yuji believe it's the same name.

  • @balakrishnavaddepally4521
    @balakrishnavaddepally4521 3 роки тому

    Any disadvantages of using interpolation

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  3 роки тому +3

      From experience no. But I’m going to do further testing after great comments here which made me curious. Stay tune

  • @뫼삼
    @뫼삼 2 роки тому

    What's trade- off use to be interpolation?

  • @SuperMusammil
    @SuperMusammil 4 роки тому +2

    Please dear k space

  • @shadowboxer6462
    @shadowboxer6462 Рік тому

    Then why have it off ever

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  Рік тому

      Good question. One thing is to save space. Having it on the file is larger. BUT that shouldn’t be the main reason. To your answer: I don’t know why it is off from the siemens tree. But you can clearly see the impact off that by having it on.

  • @praveenreddy7810
    @praveenreddy7810 7 місяців тому

    Plz new protocol

  • @taivo6241
    @taivo6241 4 роки тому

    can you share to me some books about parameter mri ( pdf) ¿

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  4 роки тому +2

      I don’t have any pdf of books. I recommend you to invest in this one for further understanding : www.amazon.co.uk/Handbook-MRI-Technique-Catherine-Westbrook/dp/1118661621/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?dchild=1&keywords=catherine+westbrook+mri&qid=1600528042&sr=8-3

    • @sudishkumarp1944
      @sudishkumarp1944 4 роки тому +2

      How we minimize time in DWI sequence in spine plz make video