Your Guide to a Trump vs. Biden Debate
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 чер 2024
- We don’t know exactly what will happen when President Biden and former president Donald J. Trump take the debate stage in Atlanta tonight.
We do know, however, that the first debate between the major party candidates is happening earlier in the election season than usual. And we also know that we’ve seen a version of this show before.
Their past matchups have featured bitter insults, constant interruptions and were political spectacles judged more on optics than on substance.
This year, considering that the candidates are offering radically different visions for the country, it’s hard to imagine an election in which the substance would matter more.
So, today, at least on “The Run-Up,” there’s no buzzer, no microphone muting and no debate-stage theatrics.
Instead, we call four Times colleagues to talk about what the candidates are actually promising for a second term on four key issues: the economy, immigration, abortion and foreign policy.
On today’s episode
Jim Tankersley (www.nytimes.com/by/jim-tanker...) , a reporter covering economic and tax policy.
Zolan Kanno-Youngs (www.nytimes.com/by/zolan-kann...) , a White House correspondent.
Lisa Lerer (www.nytimes.com/by/lisa-lerer) , a national political correspondent.
David E. Sanger (www.nytimes.com/by/david-e-sa...) , a White House and national security correspondent.
Do you have a question about the 2024 election? We want to hear from you. Fill out this form (www.nytimes.com/article/2024-...) or email us at therunup@nytimes.com (mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?fs=...)
C'mon man those damn cannibals ate my uncle Lil Boosie 😮
🧟♂️🧟♂️🧟♂️🧟♂️
Nah, Big moe ran them over with his big rig.
haha that is funny joe said that ! ! trump is guilty of rape!
@@whatsgoodmyguy4391😂
😂
Imagine being the side that has to remove a crowd, set the rules, and will only debate if its with your propagandist moderators. 😂🤡
imagine voting for someone guilty of rape and buisness fraud!
Didn't Trump say any time any place. Trump believes the whole world worship him. Trump is so wrong, the sane people in the world, believe he couldn't run a water tap. Biden is the opposite to Trump. Biden is a man with morals and a true leader. Trump brain is focus on Trump only. Nobody matter to trump, but Trump.Vote Biden all the way.
no matter who wins, they gotta fix this housing market, let it crash .. people mocked Jimmy McMillan, but he was right all along "The rent is too damn high"
Biden says the economy is fixed and good. He doesn't care. But yet half the country will vote for him
😂 ain’t no crashing this time. That ship has sailed.. if Trump wins, he will likely drop interest rate maybe to 4 or 5% and the buying frenzy will begin yet again. Too many people itching to buy that missed the first round. Prices will not decrease by much if any..might actually increase a bit
@@bestman7776 a great option is to live, retire overseas, the madness is only here, don't use your hard earned money to reward bad behavior and in turn hurt yourself financially
Biden skipped the Dem debates
In 1946 The US still called American Indians who there are and by 1971 you called us Black. We know and you must pay for it. We were never a Black . It was a racist term that the US used and that is illegal.
The worst display of racism happened in 2021 when President Bided used that term over 25 times in www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/06/02/remarks-by-president-biden-commemorating-the-100th-anniversary-of-the-tulsa-race-massacre/ There was no excuse for Congress allowing that to happen which shows them as guilty as Biden. We were never Black at all.
Standard Form 181 (Rev. 5-82) U.S. Office of Personnel Management FPM Supplement 298-1 RACE AND NATIONAL ORIGIN IDENTIFICATION Black: A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. Does not include persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other Spanish cultures or origins (see Hispanic).
We are not Black at all. We are American Indians and you called us that but did you know who we really are?
encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/articles-of-peace-1677/
image.png
You thought you could steal from Kings and Queens and got caught. There are no excuses and no space to BEG you will either leave very fast you will DIE in prison.
guides.loc.gov/american-indian-law/Cases
Federal court decisions have carved the framework for American Indian law. Some famous court cases have discussed topics ranging from fishing rights, like United States v. Washington External (the Boldt decision External), to matters involving taxation, such as those discussed in Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation.
Because the issues covered in American Indian case law are nearly endless, this page focuses on landmark cases and more recent litigation argued before the Indian Claims Commission. Researchers who are interested in learning more about American Indian decisions may find useful resources linked in the tabbed box at the bottom of this page.
A stereograph card with images of the U.S. Supreme Court Chamber from 1865
Ingersoll View Company, contributor. U. S. Supreme Court Chamber, Capitol, Wash. 1865. Library of Congress Prints & Photographs Division.
Marshall Trilogy
American Indian law as we know it today is rooted in Supreme Court cases from the early 19th century. Three cases in particular, sometimes referred to as the Marshall Trilogy, lay the foundation for the federal government's interaction and relationship with Indian tribes.
In Johnson v. M’Intosh, the Supreme Court held that the federal government has the exclusive right to negotiate the transfer of land from American Indian tribes. The Court further determined that American Indian tribes did not own the land that is now the United States before or after the arrival of European settlers, but instead had a "title of occupancy." This opinion gave legal justification for the federal government to take land where tribes resided without just compensation, side-stepping the Fifth Amendment's takings clause.
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia arose from an attempt by a delegation of Cherokee to stop the state of Georgia from extending state laws and authority over the Cherokee Nation. The Supreme Court declined review of the case, concluding that Cherokee Nation did not have standing to sue the government because it was not a sovereign nation. Instead, the Supreme Court concluded that a tribe is a “domestic dependent nation,” and the relationship between the federal government and tribes more closely resembles that of a “ward to his guardian.”
In the third case in the Marshall trilogy, Worcester v. Georgia, the Court held that state laws "could have no force” in Indian territory, and that the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the exclusive authority to regulate Indian affairs.
Indian Claims Commission
In 1946, Congress passed the Indian Claims Commission Act. This law established the Indian Claims Commission (Commission) to resolve specific tribal claims seeking compensatory damages against the United States. For example, the statute authorized the Commission to hear "claims which would result if the treaties, contracts, and agreements between the [tribe] and the United States were revised on the ground of fraud, duress, unconscionable consideration, mutual or unilateral mistake . . . or any other ground . . ." Indian Claims Commission Act, ch. 959, 60 Stat. 1049, 1050 (Aug. 13, 1946). In the decades preceding the Commission's creation, tribes and tribal members had tried to file complaints against the federal government through the Court of Claims, by jurisdictional acts of Congress. Resolution through this process, however, was time-consuming and difficult. According to United States Indian Claims Commission, August 13, 1946-September 30, 1978: Final Report (PDF) External (p. 3), "by 1946, almost 200 claims were filed with the Court of Claims; but only 29 received awards, while the bulk of the rest were dismissed on technicalities[.]"
Tribes had five years from the Commission's establishment to file their claims. Although the Commission was originally intended to terminate after a decade, Congress passed laws extending the Commission several times before it was disbanded in 1978. Because many claims remained pending at this time, unresolved matters were transferred to the Court of Claims (now called the U.S. Court of Federal Claims). The open dockets were adjudicated and resolved over the next several decades, with the final case reaching a settlement in 2006.
he’s the incumbent, trump skipped the republican debates in 2020 by your logic
@@Brockliy Trump didn’t have people running against him in 2020. Biden had a lot of contenders
Neither candidate participated in the primary debates.
Trump didn't bc he was So Far Ahead in the polls. It was basically auditions for Republican VP
Theyre going to pump Biden so full of speed/adrenaline its not even funny.
Its elder abuse.
@@Garrett_Bear_Stap AGREE= Elder Abuse 2.0
Biden taking performance enhancing drugs is DANGEROUS to his health. But if he doesn’t take anything, President Trump will mop the floor with Biden. AND I don’t trust CNN, MSNBC or NPR.
The CNN “fact checkers” are PAID BY CNN. What a joke!
Stopped watching at " Briben upped the anti by insisting on cnn" 😂 are you kidding me? Upping the anti would be letting an audience be there and having Tucker Carlson as moderator
Don’t need a guide for me to make up my own freakin mind
Most people don't even need a debate. They've already made up their minds and the debate is just going to confirm their bias.
Relax. They’re just trying to inform you.
Your guide to a debate that is controlled to make one party look bad
Nope you guys don't need any help with that. Trump will just naturally make you guys look bad.
Not sure what country you guys have been living in for the past 4 years
Oh please tell me all about it in New York times. That was sarcastic.
That's funny because....
You've run out of free replies.
Subscribe for $1/month.
Hilarious...
So desperate they are telling you how to think.
For a freaking debate!
3v1
Spoiler Alert: Obama sneaks up on Trump midsentence on the mic with a WWE chair shot to the head, and Biden retains the Undisputed Heavyweight Presidentship by disqualification
Biden gets 2 debaters Trump should get 2 debaters
In 1946 The US still called American Indians who there are and by 1971 you called us Black. We know and you must pay for it. We were never a Black . It was a racist term that the US used and that is illegal.
The worst display of racism happened in 2021 when President Bided used that term over 25 times in www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/06/02/remarks-by-president-biden-commemorating-the-100th-anniversary-of-the-tulsa-race-massacre/ There was no excuse for Congress allowing that to happen which shows them as guilty as Biden. We were never Black at all.
Standard Form 181 (Rev. 5-82) U.S. Office of Personnel Management FPM Supplement 298-1 RACE AND NATIONAL ORIGIN IDENTIFICATION Black: A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. Does not include persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American, or other Spanish cultures or origins (see Hispanic).
We are not Black at all. We are American Indians and you called us that but did you know who we really are?
encyclopediavirginia.org/primary-documents/articles-of-peace-1677/
image.png
You thought you could steal from Kings and Queens and got caught. There are no excuses and no space to BEG you will either leave very fast you will DIE in prison.
guides.loc.gov/american-indian-law/Cases
Federal court decisions have carved the framework for American Indian law. Some famous court cases have discussed topics ranging from fishing rights, like United States v. Washington External (the Boldt decision External), to matters involving taxation, such as those discussed in Wagnon v. Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation.
Because the issues covered in American Indian case law are nearly endless, this page focuses on landmark cases and more recent litigation argued before the Indian Claims Commission. Researchers who are interested in learning more about American Indian decisions may find useful resources linked in the tabbed box at the bottom of this page.
A stereograph card with images of the U.S. Supreme Court Chamber from 1865
Ingersoll View Company, contributor. U. S. Supreme Court Chamber, Capitol, Wash. 1865. Library of Congress Prints & Photographs Division.
Marshall Trilogy
American Indian law as we know it today is rooted in Supreme Court cases from the early 19th century. Three cases in particular, sometimes referred to as the Marshall Trilogy, lay the foundation for the federal government's interaction and relationship with Indian tribes.
In Johnson v. M’Intosh, the Supreme Court held that the federal government has the exclusive right to negotiate the transfer of land from American Indian tribes. The Court further determined that American Indian tribes did not own the land that is now the United States before or after the arrival of European settlers, but instead had a "title of occupancy." This opinion gave legal justification for the federal government to take land where tribes resided without just compensation, side-stepping the Fifth Amendment's takings clause.
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia arose from an attempt by a delegation of Cherokee to stop the state of Georgia from extending state laws and authority over the Cherokee Nation. The Supreme Court declined review of the case, concluding that Cherokee Nation did not have standing to sue the government because it was not a sovereign nation. Instead, the Supreme Court concluded that a tribe is a “domestic dependent nation,” and the relationship between the federal government and tribes more closely resembles that of a “ward to his guardian.”
In the third case in the Marshall trilogy, Worcester v. Georgia, the Court held that state laws "could have no force” in Indian territory, and that the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the exclusive authority to regulate Indian affairs.
Indian Claims Commission
In 1946, Congress passed the Indian Claims Commission Act. This law established the Indian Claims Commission (Commission) to resolve specific tribal claims seeking compensatory damages against the United States. For example, the statute authorized the Commission to hear "claims which would result if the treaties, contracts, and agreements between the [tribe] and the United States were revised on the ground of fraud, duress, unconscionable consideration, mutual or unilateral mistake . . . or any other ground . . ." Indian Claims Commission Act, ch. 959, 60 Stat. 1049, 1050 (Aug. 13, 1946). In the decades preceding the Commission's creation, tribes and tribal members had tried to file complaints against the federal government through the Court of Claims, by jurisdictional acts of Congress. Resolution through this process, however, was time-consuming and difficult. According to United States Indian Claims Commission, August 13, 1946-September 30, 1978: Final Report (PDF) External (p. 3), "by 1946, almost 200 claims were filed with the Court of Claims; but only 29 received awards, while the bulk of the rest were dismissed on technicalities[.]"
Tribes had five years from the Commission's establishment to file their claims. Although the Commission was originally intended to terminate after a decade, Congress passed laws extending the Commission several times before it was disbanded in 1978. Because many claims remained pending at this time, unresolved matters were transferred to the Court of Claims (now called the U.S. Court of Federal Claims). The open dockets were adjudicated and resolved over the next several decades, with the final case reaching a settlement in 2006.
The hell are you trying to say? Learn English
Just like Trumps kangaroo trial, it won't be fair to Trump.
Just like the Hunter Biden trial?
Got a bit of orange on your nose
He’s going in fully aware of that. So. He is already ahead of the game. Enjoy the show. ✌🏼
Stfu grandpa and go watch Joe Scarborough @@redwind5150
Trump is going to prison BANKRUPT. Nothing can stop that now. 3 more Federal trials and several state trials to go.
Trump doesn't have to debates he still win
yes we be so tired of winning ...
Can’t wait for the Trump vs Biden/Tapper/Bash debate
President Trump will wipe the floor with them 🎉
Floor wiping will only happen when Traitor Trump overfills his diapers.
And yet somehow these NYT people who claim to be so smart couldn’t predict that the senile guy would fall apart in the debates.
Complete obedience to regime narrative, just like they always do.
Why would Trump debate any GOP when he had the nomination locked up.
This will be a CNN show "trial."
It will not be a debate.
CNN has already set it up as a courtroom.
I will be 3 vs 1 tonight.
Sure….let the old corpse that wanders off stage debate a lunatic…..
I’m sure the corpse will win 😂
A total waste of time that proves nothing whatsoever and that was 20 years ago. Today I have no words to describe what’s going on as far as civilized discourse is concerned, therefore, what’s the point of this.
Tell me how to think.
Trump 2024 ❤❤❤❤ !!!!!
You forgot to mention Briben's stipulations that he needed to accept the challenge.
"My candidate won while your candidate looked lost." There, I saved 95% of people the trouble of watching the debate.
Yes, President Trump Won The 🇺🇸 Presidency 45-47 ! & Joe just WON a Trip to The HOME ... Nursing Home. 🙄
TRUMP already won the debate if you ask most people.
Be sure to give each of them a nice little sticker
hasnt won a popular vote in 30 yrs
I want Biden to winnnnn
sorry for your luck .
My guide is i dont give a f#$k about either.
That's badass! /s
Weirdo call trump president trump and calls the actual president as Biden smh
Biden is The Resident in Chief . He needs a whole week AND 16 Advisors To Prepare for a 1 Hour Debate ?? 🙄😂 😂 😂
👍🏻 Correct ! 👏🏻 👏🏻
Trump gonna win, Trump gonna win, and there’s nothing you can do about it… hahahahahah Trump gonna win 😆
he's so tired of winning ....
And if he didn't it's RIGGED, right?
@@kahlilbtTrump is already So Far Ahead in Polls, Swing States & Campaign Donations; AFTER this Debate : TRUMP'S #s WILL GO UP .. again . 🎉
@@AmericanWoman-rh2xmTrump is not ahead in the polls. Telling people that, is just a lie. Maga are loosing in most, if not all ststes. Most sane people want a leader with a vison. You don't hear Biden raving, about snakes, batteries and sharks. That all you hear from Trump. Vote Biden all the way for sanity.
New York SLIMES !!!!!
kiss off Bozos !!!
❤😂
Bull crap
Good discussion and information, but to treat Trump like a normal candidate when he’s done and advocated for so much that threatens our democracy is saddening, and just not enough.
Russia is in Cuba. Yeah, that isn't a threat to our country, but Trump being found guilty by a kangaroo court is what will save our republic. Only communist use the word democracy to describe this country.
Your comment does not support democracy or fairness.
Just so you know, the United States of America is a Republic. It's funny how people spew out nonsense that they hear.
You seem confused
@@markwells79 how does my comment not support fairness? How do any of the following support democracy: calling for the termination of the constitution, scheming to install fake electors, riling up and gleefully watching and supporting the J6ers and calling them beautiful people and political prisoners and promising to pardon them, calling normal Americans “vermin,” saying the government should censor or shut down media platforms, retaining classified materials after turning over only some and lying about it then obstructing investigations into it, canceling legal cases against him (which he would certainly do if he wins), allegedly calling fallen soldiers losers and suckers? Why would someone who truly believes in this country and democracy ever joke about being a dictator, even for a day?
I would not be surprised if Trump backs out at the last minute. And blames the democrats or anybody else for himself being a coward.
Bet! 10 bucks says naw and you're projecting ya silly goose🙄
biden is the coward how often did he show his face last election basement campaign again. He can't answer question unless he has them first. biden is the WORST PRESIDENT EVER.!!! Hands Down. !!!
Biden was the coward and refused Trump’s debates until now.
Someone's been watching too much MSDNC 😂😂
Yes, he is coward but remember if he doesn’t show he gets a prison sentence. It’s going to be hilarious watching Biden call him a clown again.