It's the "low pressure" account. He doesn't have to worry about elo, so he can play better. Also he must be listening to a song with 200bpm, that's why he's consistent with the .3s per move. He's just feeling the beat.
Really appreciate your content Aman, you are my favorite master to learn new ideas from. It blows me away that you can hold down a computer in a 3 min game. Id love to know what your strategy is when you realize what you are up against. Thanks again for all the great lessons🤙
He could be using an older engine. I remember a buddy of mine suggesting (though neither of us would ever try) that some clown running Fruit 2.3.1 or Rybka might skirt under the ban radar for a while, since their playing has so many inaccuracies compared to the modern Stockfish. If this were the case we could assume the opponent would lack a lot of positional understanding, but still be very strong tactically; misjudge a lot of piece imbalances, but spend a lot of energy getting a material advantage (working extra hard to grab an extra pawn and hold onto it); and have mixed results in the endgame, avoiding immediate blunders/mate threats but maybe having a hard time converting longterm ideas. A person trying this would still be edging out virtually every single person alive, while still making moves significantly inferior to what we've come to expect from Stockfish and its modern peers.
@@biankaj.v.2218 the cheating systems probably have settings that let the engine play on it's own so you don't have to perform the moves with your mouse yourself
No need, there's chrome extensions that you just click or hold a button on your keyboard and it plays the moves for you. It also has a level slider so you can adjust it to different levels of play and it can also mimic human play. Sad world we live in.
That second game was a draw all day, but I guess there wasn't enough time to get to the 50-move rule... It was strange how he promoved a win in that game too. He's either psychic or he had an auto bot engine running.
g5 in the first game is a trick you often see in those chesscom "endgame fundamentals" drills. i feel like that was one of the less suspicious things he did
@@hidude1354 maybe a bit. this kind of thing really should be automatic for a chesscom 2500+ player, but whether it actually is is another question. many titled players have bad fundies
At 10:04 when he has no entry points why don’t you continue to just move your King along those back white squares and draw with 50 move rule seems like 25 seconds is enough for you to do that or did you eventually play f6 just to prove it was a bot that would then finish and win perfectly?
im so sick and tired of people telling me to stop accusing people of cheating without evidence when cases like this are blatantly obvious and all over the website... how dumb do you have to be to not realize how easy it would be to actually hide it with just an ounce of effort
I agree. Coming from a programming background, writing a bot that evades the cheating detection is trivial. I'm genuinely surprised just how many people are too stupid (or too lazy) to cheat properly, but there's going to be hundreds and thousands who are going to put in 10% more effort. And that's just looking at people who blatantly bot, those who check with an engine in critical moments are probably in or close to double digit percentage and literally impossible to identify.
It's the "low pressure" account. He doesn't have to worry about elo, so he can play better. Also he must be listening to a song with 200bpm, that's why he's consistent with the .3s per move. He's just feeling the beat.
Don’t forget a good gaming mouse and a chair😂
"In all of life there is a rhythm" ass player
In all of life, there is a rhythm.
8:16 "very hard to understand this guy"
Yeah, stockfish is kind of a mystery isn't it?
but wait, don't you dare... the guy is just "so good", "a young talent"
He's got the bullet engine toggle ready
Pooja came back the the extra long stilettos
Really appreciate your content Aman, you are my favorite master to learn new ideas from. It blows me away that you can hold down a computer in a 3 min game. Id love to know what your strategy is when you realize what you are up against. Thanks again for all the great lessons🤙
He could be using an older engine. I remember a buddy of mine suggesting (though neither of us would ever try) that some clown running Fruit 2.3.1 or Rybka might skirt under the ban radar for a while, since their playing has so many inaccuracies compared to the modern Stockfish.
If this were the case we could assume the opponent would lack a lot of positional understanding, but still be very strong tactically; misjudge a lot of piece imbalances, but spend a lot of energy getting a material advantage (working extra hard to grab an extra pawn and hold onto it); and have mixed results in the endgame, avoiding immediate blunders/mate threats but maybe having a hard time converting longterm ideas.
A person trying this would still be edging out virtually every single person alive, while still making moves significantly inferior to what we've come to expect from Stockfish and its modern peers.
Good suggestion. How does play the given moves fast tho?
Or just any modern engine setting parameters to shallower/less branches, which also explains the speed.
@@biankaj.v.2218 the cheating systems probably have settings that let the engine play on it's own so you don't have to perform the moves with your mouse yourself
No need, there's chrome extensions that you just click or hold a button on your keyboard and it plays the moves for you. It also has a level slider so you can adjust it to different levels of play and it can also mimic human play. Sad world we live in.
That'' exactly how cheaters do it without getting caught
That second game was a draw all day, but I guess there wasn't enough time to get to the 50-move rule... It was strange how he promoved a win in that game too. He's either psychic or he had an auto bot engine running.
Praying Aman brings back the 100 GM tips series 🙏🏻
We will! Just getting back to a regular uploading schedule first
@ thank you for the update! Can’t wait to watch!!! 😁
Been waiting for those tips for the longest, I'm happy to know it'll be back
@@chessbrahok
Tunes ftw! Chessbrah was always about the tunes, let’s not forget.
"Neugebauer" in German means "newlybuilt". Maybe he's referring to his newly built 5-hour-old account.
I'll never miss an Aman cheater video
Can you guys do an accelerated dragon speedrun?
He’s either really good or really bad lmao
He was my coach - he's actually really good and constantly plays in tournaments.
g5 in the first game is a trick you often see in those chesscom "endgame fundamentals" drills. i feel like that was one of the less suspicious things he did
The fact he spotted it instantly when he had so much time to just give it some thought for confirmation's sake is just weird
@@hidude1354 maybe a bit. this kind of thing really should be automatic for a chesscom 2500+ player, but whether it actually is is another question. many titled players have bad fundies
At 10:04 when he has no entry points why don’t you continue to just move your King along those back white squares and draw with 50 move rule seems like 25 seconds is enough for you to do that or did you eventually play f6 just to prove it was a bot that would then finish and win perfectly?
probably the latter, guy's a gm
He used to be my coach!
I think this opposite is not using an engine, but a bot program, which is even worse.
Anyone have song ID in second game?
I love these series vs cheaters. Such losers lol
Just noticed Aman is at 2974 blitz rating, big 3k video coming soon??
Weirdly enough, my biochemistry professor has the same last name🤨
Who follows Re6 with Re7?
Comment for the algo
im so sick and tired of people telling me to stop accusing people of cheating without evidence when cases like this are blatantly obvious and all over the website... how dumb do you have to be to not realize how easy it would be to actually hide it with just an ounce of effort
I agree. Coming from a programming background, writing a bot that evades the cheating detection is trivial. I'm genuinely surprised just how many people are too stupid (or too lazy) to cheat properly, but there's going to be hundreds and thousands who are going to put in 10% more effort. And that's just looking at people who blatantly bot, those who check with an engine in critical moments are probably in or close to double digit percentage and literally impossible to identify.
The whole point of cheating is to NOT put in effort
@@sysys1 so the entire point is to not keep your account... got it. you mustve put a lot of thought into that one
Get over yourself lol you're not as good as you think you are
@ found a person who cheats.
Anyone else here in 2026?
Bruhhh is 2025
@@willdahud4350 then the answer to the question will be "no" until 01/01/2026
Eventually
I remember when YT comments were organic and original now people like you are just recycling someone else’s comment in order to try and get likes.
2028 for me
Soooo....if this is legit....what to do with the IM's REAL account? 👀
5:00 you really suck blundered that end game hard
nah he is the real martin 250 elo trolling around
Plays bad moves twice at 2800k elo, muh, ChEaTeR.
Guy moves king around with everything secured: ''guy moves instantly.'' LOOOl. What a loser.
You didn’t watch till the end, did you?
47 min ago and kinda early also 5th comment
First!