@@mickdevlin I think it is likely that they simply understand Beckett in a different way, through their own personal 'idioculture', to use one of Attridge's own terms. The lecture is not trying to say something essential about Beckett it is simply trying to see how ideas of performativity, singularity, signature might bear some significance to Becketts work, hence the theoretical debt owed to Derrida.
This really helped me understand more about Beckett. Thanks for posting.
Not enough lectures on Beckett on UA-cam. Thanks for posting.
This is great...
Thanks!
But what about the anger & distress that you agree wells up in the narrative?
I’ve watched 100’s of lectures/conferences on UA-cam through the years. This, by far, is the most boring.
very nice , good semiosis
Longitude 127 Seoul Okinawa Soul Axis -- Bahai Faith Rael
Jesus Huh kyung young
Great aletheia .
beckett would have hated this guy
Holy Boredom, Batman!
this is awful, he admits about 20 minutes in that he's only going to talk about the final book, and spends the first half rambling about derride
Agreed. This idiot does NOT understand Sam.
@@mickdevlin I think it is likely that they simply understand Beckett in a different way, through their own personal 'idioculture', to use one of Attridge's own terms. The lecture is not trying to say something essential about Beckett it is simply trying to see how ideas of performativity, singularity, signature might bear some significance to Becketts work, hence the theoretical debt owed to Derrida.
@@harryparks8395 well said
It's like a parody of boredom. The poor audience.
Enjoy your Barbie movie, I'm certain it will not bore you.