Apollo 17: Why Did America Cease Moon Landing Operations? | Secrets of the Last Lunar Landing
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 сер 2020
- The Apollo 17 mission was the final opportunity to collect first hand information about the history and origin of the Moon. This film looks at this historic mission through the eyes of those who participated in it. Including Commander Eugene Cernan, Lunar Module Pilot Harrison Schmitt.
Subscribe to Spark for more amazing science, tech & engineering videos: goo.gl/LIrlur 🚀
Find us on:
Facebook: / sparkdocs
Instagram: / spark_channel
Content licensed from Monarch to Little Dot Studios.
Any queries, please contact us at: owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com
#Spark #Apollo17 #SpaceRace - Наука та технологія
50 years ago, they went 10,000 times farther from earth than we are capable of today, with literally one millionth of the computing power of a cellphone, and one thousandth of our current astronomical knowledge. Isn't that amazing?
"50 years ago, they went 10,000 times farther from earth than we are capable of today"
The moon is 238,000 miles away. Divide that by 10,000. 23.8 miles. That's what you think our capabilities are?
"with literally one millionth of the computing power of a cellphone"
Well, you can't really qualify computing power exactly that way. It is not merely clock speed and amount of memory. It also involves how the circuitry actually works. But, whatever, I'm happy enough with saying it was a millionth (or less) for the onboard computers. But, they had all of those massive mainframes on the ground doing the big number crunching. Anyway, I fail to understand why this matters to you? So what? A modern cell phone has a million times more power than phones from the 1960s also. Yet, they could make phone calls. Was there a point to why you think today's processing power is relevant?
"and one thousandth of our current astronomical knowledge."
Uh, all they needed to know about was THE MOON. In order to go to the moon, they didn't need to spot black holes at the center of galaxies, they didn't need to detect gravity waves, they didn't need to watch distant stars oscillate due to large planets orbiting them. All they needed to know about was THE MOON.
"Isn't that amazing?"
No, what would be amazing would be if a single one of you hoax nuts actually knew anything about the topics you're pretending to know. It would be amazing if a single one of you people could actually do math. It would be amazing if a single one of you would offer a shred of actual EVIDENCE for your beliefs, rather than just "isn't that amazing" incredulity.
There are scientists recorded (NASA scientists) in videos, saying we have not found a way to safely leave low earth orbit…to travel to deep space…as in to travel to the moon. I am not making this up. There have been recordings of astronauts on the space station or shuttle (not sure which) saying they look forward to man traveling beyond low earth orbit one day…that it is something g not yet done. I did not say these things. Scientists and astronauts said these things. The astronauts said it while weightless in space. If they let it slip, why shouldn’t I believe them? Why shouldn’t that be the truth? And why shouldn’t I doubt a govt who has a very long history of lying to the public and to the world to achieve its ends as do all govts?
@@fairyprincess911 so give me link to the scientist saying this...
@@gives_bad_advice Jesus Christ. It will take me forever to go through my videos to find it to prove something to someone who isn’t prepared to hear it or see it. Am I willing to do that? No. I don’t know you
Sure a scientist who wants to keeps his job, or life.
This moon story is like a kid who believes in Santa Claus but when he gets older, he realized that it was just his parents putting gifts inside the socks.
Exactly, the gringos are fools. They will believe everything the crooks at the top tell them. Master in the art of deceive, and a true Old Thousand.
WE GOT ONE THAT CAN SEE!!!
GOD MADE THE FIRMAMENT TO SEPERATE THE WATERS FROM THE WATERS ABOVE!!!
Best comment I’ve read 😂😂😂
Lol
I would rather believe we went to the sun and had a barbeque than we going to the moon😂😂😂
That’s one small step for man and one giant leap for cinema
It actually would be if it were even remotely possible to fake it. Then or now.
Kubrick
@@BadAtTeaDude Nolan, Whedon, Lucas, Cameron, Abrams, Scott. And seriously, Blomkamp, Villeneuve and del Toro, although the latter usually stays on earth.
Which landing was faked? Hmmm? 11,12,14,15,16 or 17??!
Another bunch of dopes
You can’t go back somewhere you’ve never been
😆
LOL, except that we've been there. My theory is that they discovered that aliens been there before us ...
Shhhhhh
Exactly!!! Haha!
Flat earther.....
Here is the shape of the earth 🌎 just incase you fall off the edge of your first grade theory.
I love how ten minutes in the breathless description of takeoff sounds like one of the little rascals describing his first sledding experience to his friends. Sound effects and all.
If you told the last man who was on the moon that for the next 50 years no person would go further than a earth hugging space station he would think you were crazy.
Kinda telling if you ask me
Not if you were honest and said the Apollo program’s only real reason for it existence was to beat the Soviets.
All the stuff about science was just smoke.
executivesteps Go and research how much effort the Soviets were actually putting into landing a man on the moon. Legitimate documents from 1962 quote the head of the Soviet space program saying they had no interest in sending a man to the moon without proper planning just to appease a time constraint. No country on this planet has even sent an animal beyond the radiation belt. Just using your common sense, do you think they would send a human being where they have never sent the monkey?
@@DFMMei It's kind of telling what you don't know.
@@DFMMei You certainly don't have any common sense. Why else would you talk about the Van Allen Belts when you don't even know what they are. What you think you know you don't. Humans have passed the Van Allen Belrs of Radiation. And if you come back and say they haven't you need to back it with proof and show you know what the belts are and what causes them. The way it stands right now I'm going to show everyone how ignorant you are.
Buzz said he never went to the moon in an interview. I believe him. Armstrong also said he didn't go to the moon.
link please to Aldrin or Armstrong saying they never went to the moon...thank you...
Watch the entire interview, not the hoaxtard hack-job.
Neither of them said any such thing.
It was so well “staged”!
@@Paul-md1dc the Saturn V rocket had three stages...
Well all I can say is that we all know human emotions,,those three guys,Buzz,Niel,and Micheal sure didn't act like they just came back from landing on the moon..anyone else notice this,they seemed scared ,worried ,not willing to talk.Idk it's never set right with me
what the hell are you babbling on about....?
Huh? Scared? Not talk? They did a million interviews, lectures, etc. You don't even know how to spell their names. What could you possibly understand here?
@@KPL400 the main press conference after they supposedly returned
Jesus you need help.
@@KPL400 the truth that wtf he talkn bout do lil research son🤦♂️
SO, DID I MISS SOMETHING? THE TITLE IS WHY WE NEVER WENT BACK?? I HEARD NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT THAT?? WHAT THE HELL!!!
My thoughts exactly. !!! ❤❤❤. Click bait I think
So correct and when u question the reason why u are told u are crazy
Puré clickbait indeed…
Sucked us all in
You missed the question mark
All Hollywood studios have been booked lately. 😆
Can't find any good help cause of Rona
Exactly lol
and Kubrick died 😪
@@bryandungee1029 hi j hook u
Hi I oh
Tom Hanks went to the moon....
Saw it on TV
Must be true.
Congratulations... you qualify to have this epitaph on your gravestone... 'his mothers one small moment with a stranger made one giant idiot for mankind'.
@@KPL400 must be talking about yourself 🤭. WideAwake is right
@@miguelrosado7014 no referring to flat earth idiots which obviously includes you....
America is doomed, our schools and government have failed us... what would our grandparents think...shameful ...I bet you believe there's more than 2 genders too, and that if a man thinks he's a girl he can have a baby
@@alteredbeast1974 smh yep
The moon has no gravity but the walk in the movie is really a movie
hi sameh, hope that you are well. You wrote "The moon has no gravity". Just to let you know that acceleration due to gravity on the moon's surface is 1.6 m/s2 compared to 9.81 m/s2 on the surface of the Earth. This means that the gravity on the moon is about 1/6 the value on the Earth. Take care.
Tell that to big wave surfers..
Getting lost on the moon? Just follow your tracks back to where you started.
George W. Getting back to the moon? Simple,just follow the footprints from the last 3 trips....oh wait,all traces of their existence have been mysteriously lost or erased from history! Please.....
214.6 degree lunar surface average temp, I seriously doubt that working out.
@@supertramp6011 They went to the Moon.
@@boomstick4054 Although huge temperature variations occur on the Moon, the astronauts were never actually exposed to them. The maximum temperature on the Moon is +260F at lunar noon but with no atmosphere this refers to surface temperature not atmospheric temperature. Every Apollo landing was made shortly after lunar sunrise. One Lunar day (dawn to dusk) lasts nearly 15 Earth days, and the astronauts were only on the Moon for a maximum of 3 Earth days, so they weren’t there long enough for the Sun to be at its highest and hottest. The average maximum surface temperature during the missions was an average of about +106F.
Nasa
Because animation and cgi is what we do. 👍
Congratulations... you qualify to have this epitaph on your gravestone... 'his mothers one small moment with a stranger made one giant idiot for mankind'.
Turns out Disney was involved with Nasa. I saw a documentary on this subject but was taken down by UA-cam. It was really deep and hard proof the moon landing was staged.
cgi and animation? in 1969? are you braindead?
@@KianWdx where does it mention a date? Bot Tard
@@BadAtTeaDude the moon landings took place between 1969 and 1972 you neanderthal
Fact 1 : Technology never goes backward.
Fact 2 : Nobody destroys extremely expensive technology.
Fact 1 + Fact 2 = Fact 3 :
That technology never existed.
Or, and follow me here, the technology is still on display in museums for everyone to see.
Fact 1 : Technology didn't go backward.
Fact 2 : People destroy extremely expensive technology all the time.
Fact 3 : That technology is on public display for everyone to see.
Fact 1 + Fact 2 + Fact 3 = Fact 4 :
You don't know what you're talking about.
So, basically, you're saying the Concorde never existed? Huh?
Concorde travelled at Mach 2.2 at 60,000 ft, the X15 at Mach 6.7 at 100,000 ft, the SR71 at Mach 3.2 at 85,000 ft. They are all no longer flying. Another case of technology going backwards.
NASA did not lose the technology to go to the Moon in the sense that it was forgotten, mislaid or mysteriously disappeared. A lot of the blueprints still exist on file; but the individual knowledge of everyone involved and the “organisational know-how” of how to actually run such a huge, complex project has been lost. Most of the engineers and technicians are now retired or dead. And on top of that, much of the equipment is incredibly dated, and many things cannot be bought “off the shelf” but would have to be specially manufactured. Re-designing from scratch is cheaper and better. However, there is a price to pay; it takes years to build up that sort of expertise and NASA is going through the problems it had in the early to mid-60’s. The political imperative to accomplish it is also not there as it was during the Cold War. If it is delayed now no one really cares as much, as it’s just another government project that’s fallen behind.
Technological lines are sometimes abandoned and forgotten in favour of others. A classical example is that of Zeppelin airships. Technology can go backward indeed in the history of civilizations. It happened in India.
You notice they didn't show you the entire take off the module but they show you the space recording n you question yourself how in.the hell they record it when this present we can't do that
so there was a camera man some where in space
No.
Because we never went there in the first place. The greatest con job on humanity
30:54 it is a good thing that the cameraman stayed and filmed it. It looks mind-blowingly realistic by the way!
And after years of patient explanation of things like this, still you conspiritards can't get your tiny minds round the answers.
They left a camera, not a cameraman
@@legoworks-cg5hk of course they did, and the camera automatically panned as the realistic saucer ascended from the moon's surface.
But the best part is definitely the explosion in the moment of the lift-off. It looks great.
@@marcusbrsp there’s a thing called electricity. Never heard of it?
@@legoworks-cg5hk I am an engineer who am certainly open to the idea that we went there. In fact, I grew up not even questioning it. But the more footage I see, the less likely I find it that we ever went. On top of that there was a huge political reason to lie about it. Kennedy, on behalf of the West, had promised "before 1970..." and the Cold War was a serious dick measuring contest.
And then we just stopped going there for 50 years. Sure, it is expensive, but not more expensive than the meaningless wars USA have been having.
Why was the radio transmission from the moon to Houston overlooked as the greatest radio achievement in the world? The distance to the moon is roughly 10 times the distance of the entire circumference around the earth. Know-it-all’s tell me NASA had a huge radio system in Houston, but exactly WHAT we’re they packing on the moon that could transmit that strong of a signal??? They didn’t even bother to bring along drilling equipment???? but they brought along a radio this powerful? Where are the specs on this radio?
Houston didn't receive the signal. Australia did, and was relayed via Earth orbiting satellites to Houston. There are 3 tracking stations used in Apollo. One in Australia, California, and Spain. You'll notice that on a globe, these three places make a somewhat equilateral triangle so they have constant 24/7 contact with the Moon.
The Antennas used to receive the signal was 26 meters in diameter with a max transmitting power of 20,000 Watts.
In other words, a small antenna on the Moon means a big antenna on Earth can pick up the signal. A large antenna on Earth can transmit a signal powerful enough for a small antenna to pick up the signal on the Moon.
_"They didn’t even bother to bring along drilling equipment?"_
They did bring drilling equipment. Called the Apollo Lunar Surface Drill. It was used on Apollo 15, 16 and 17.
@Nick Giorgione Well, you would know.
@@SSran-iv4lu 1 W is 10 km,100 W is 100 km , a 1m dish is 10.000 km, a 26m dish is 300.000 km
A small HAM radio can produce a signal powerful enough to go around the world bouncing off of clouds and the ionosphere.
A straight shot is a lot easier even though it is a lot farther.
Of course every time they went around the back side they were blacked out.
@@michaelszczys8316 they were 4 years too early to listen to The Dark Side of The Moon whilst round the back - which is a shame as it would’ve been the most ironic moment in musical & technological history 😁👍
wow ! amazing camera man he can pan , zoom , close up , angle , position , range , focus point all perfect like professional do on earth !
Yeah, cameras are really hard to operate.......
No single photo magazine, tv camera footage or anything else was anywhere NEAR perfect.
Hollywood can create anything. Fairy can fly.
@@richardgoh8725 not now, and certainly not in 1969-1972.
I like the moment when president was talking to the man on the moon 🌕 on a landline phone 😂📱📞
Cordless phone was not invented yet?
The landline was to Houston Control center. The signal was then relayed to the Astronauts on the Moon through the same communication system that NASA was using to communicate with the Astronauts. Try learning about S-Band instead of being ignorant as to how this historical moment was achieved.
@@Renegade15 ,
Well, you could look at the evidence that proves these Moon Landings happened.
There are thousands of photos, over 800 pounds of lunar rocks & soil, hours of film of the Astronauts on the surface of the Moon, photos of the landing sites.
I love the way the astronauts obviously think the Prez is a wanker the way they talked to him. And he was.
@@twt3716 , They seem respectful to me. I don't think they thought he was a wanker.
They had many tasks to accomplish in just 2 1/2 hours.
The closest man has come to the moon was the late Michael Jackson in his moon walk.
What’s your fourth favorite conspiratard theory?
"Apollo Program"
Producer: Walt Disney deceased at that time.
Co-producer: Wernher Von Braun.
Director: Stanley Kubrick
Art Director: John Hoesli.
Writer: Arthur C Clarke.
Photographer: Geoffrey Unsworth.
Total cost = 169.51 billion current dollars...
Why? Just because to make a second step, a first step must exist.
Going back implies you have been there.
It sure does.
In order to go BACK to the moon, you would need to have gone in the first place. Hence, the reason we never went BACK.
🤡
because we never went the first time......lol and we still cant get there today
Lol, that comment is kinda poorly timed, considering that Artemis 1 is orbiting the moon right now.
BINGO!
James: Now it's your turn again - tell us that Artemis, and all other Moon missions, by all countries and space agencies, were faked. With evidence, of course...oh, sorry, you conspiritards don't need evidence, do you.
@@phildavenport4150 if you walked up to neil armstrong with a bible and said ..put your hand on this bible and swear you went to the moon? and he would not do it.. would you still think we went to the moon?
@@jameslavalley2647 Those things are only related in the minds of religitards. For starters, Armstrong was not attracted to organized religion, so swearing on any religious text would be meaningless to him. How did you not know this? And even if he had sworn on your bible, would you instantly believe that he had walked on the Moon? Of course not, you would simply look around for something equally unrelated and stupid. You guys are amazing - you buy the bullshit story that the landing never happened, then go searching (fruitlessly) for "gotcha" evidence that makes you feel good in your ignorance. Go play on the freeway.
I remember all of this from my teenage years and watching it all with my parents. From the very early beginnings with the 1st Russian satellite, Sputnik, sent into orbit, to the last Apollo mission, I followed the NASA Space Program. Our planet Earth is an Oasis in a Desert of Stars, Planets, etc., among the various diversity of life in the Universe. It is all UNIQUE in its entirety.
Space travel is a possibility, but NOT with the current erroneous behaviors of humanity which seems bent upon the destruction of itself and all life upon this world with HATRED, WARS, and GREED. Only by leaving past animosity attitudes and behaviors behind, and in truly caring about all life in the Universe, including with respect and dignity towards each other, will space travel ever become a true reality. Until that time, humanity will remain blinded and enslaved by its arrogance.
And we havnt been and never will go to the moon , it’s science fiction
To all those who replied to me.....@ Moonlight Shadow, You do have a point, but also what happens to those who have everything and a great disaster such as earthquakes, flooding, etc, hits home..??? Even those who have everything can lose out, and then become equal with us normals. My only prayer and hope is that there will be a future left for humanity including all life upon our Earth. If not, we are dooming ourselves to extinction.
@ iansuncoast....I hope you will research history and inventions of humanity more.... plus, for what was once what you call Science Fiction, and of those in the early Renaissance era and/or others, drawings of inventions of those past eras has already become the future of our technology in today's society.
Ever since humanity has watched birds fly, people have wondered on how they could create something to help them fly too. As with Michelangelo was not only a famous Artist/Painter and Sculptor, but also was working on inventions, one of them was a rough-draft on a helicopter form and which also helped shaped the design for future helicopters. Plus, he was studying the human body form and one drawing eventually became the image being used into the medical field and science.
In the 1800's and 1900's, many more inventions were showing up and eventually also being used and created by us normals, plus the pioneers who began looking for a better life than what they left behind, people were now riding on trains, using cotton gins, etc. Then the era of free flight with airplanes and daredevil pilots became a common scenario, exploring the skies and pushing the limits themselves on how much they could accomplish, which eventually then led us to NASA and Space exploration. With the NASA project, its contribution became what it is known today, and Tang, a freeze-dried, orange drink of the 1950's and 60's, for less weight on space flights, also led to much more freeze-dried food and other items with camping gear, including other items for hikers to use.
Robots in the movies and comics are beginning to take shape and be used, such as with the Rover on Mars, and/or the Moon''s terrain. Satellites are every where and so is the Cell phone media, which is also used extensively, and is also a miniature computer. Computers once took up a whole room with tapes, etc, now with smaller inserts, electronics have taken off in many directions, there are laptops and notepads, Ipads, etc. They are even looking into creating a wrist view-phone type to see who is on the other end, like that used by Dick Tracy of the comics.
So what was once Science Fiction of the old days, is now turning into Science Fact.
Look fairly young for pushing 80 plus
@@rdland2985 The pix of me was when I was 55 and a tour guide, during a reenacting of an early 1900's era....LOL
@@AngelCatBaby well you looking great in the pic!! Was a compliment to you for sure!!!😁
Spoiler alert!! Great documentary, but it doesn't even say why we haven't gone back, which is the title of the video!
Cernan forgot to turn out the lights.
@ 34:56,or thereabouts, I see what appears to be a medium speed flying
,illuminated small object,flying left to right,(say 7 o'clock thru 2 o'clock.
Any thoughts?
What blows my mind is we can see things on other planets but we can't see any of the things we left on the moon with our telescopes...
We can see things down to a resolution of a few feet on other planets? I'm afraid I'm going to need a source on that one.
@@ArKritz84 did anyone say that or just you.
@@MartinA-kp8xg No, OP just heavily implied it. You know, since nothing over that size has been left on the moon or anywhere else, which is why the things that *have* been left there aren't visible with "our telescopes".
@@ArKritz84 you can't quote someone with something they have not actually said, and then criticise them for words that it is you accually who said them lol how does that one work.
@@MartinA-kp8xg Let's give it a try: does it blow your mind that we can see things on other planets, but we can't see any of the things we left on the moon with our telescopes?
I remember thinking after we get to the moon the next step would be to put a station on the moon and start exploration. Now, with the realization it was all a big lie, I can't help wondering what else has been kept from us.
Pure delusion on so many levels.
YOU SAID: "I remember thinking after we get to the moon the next step would be to put a station on the moon and start exploration."
== But, what you fail to realize is that Apollo was nowhere near that type of capability. It's not like, "oh, ok, now we landed and stayed a few hours at a time, so we're ready to build permanent bases." That's ridiculous. The Apollo hardware had already been stretched to the limit. They barely managed to bring a 400 pound rover (Earth weight) to the lunar surface, let alone materials for building a station. A small station would weigh at least 300,000 pounds (Earth weight). And, in rocketry, it's all about weight. You're talking about hundreds of Saturn V launches just to get started on a base station on the moon. And, remember, they only ever managed to launch 13 of them. Apollo managed to put people on the moon for a maximum of about 74 hours on the lunar surface, then they had to come home due to lack of oxygen and food supplies, battery life, etc. Now, you're talking about permanent bases? Apollo costed (adjusted for inflation) about $250 billion, if you include all of the hard costs, soft costs, international support, and cross-support from military branches. And, for that, we got 12 people to walk on the moon for a few hours each. During the peak of Apollo spending, it costed approximately 4.5% of the entire federal budget in hard costs, plus another couple of percentage points in soft costs and international support, for the equivalent total of around 6.5% of the entire federal budget at that time. If you're now talking about staffed moon bases and extremely long stays, you're easily talking about $5 or $10 trillion (in today's dollars), roughly between 25% and 50% of the entire GNP of the USA. Basically, you're asking for something that would result in 50% taxes for everyone for many years, and the government wouldn't be able to do much of anything else besides building a moon base.
YOU SAID: "Now, with the realization it was all a big lie"
== Your "realization" about a big lie is just as delusional as your thoughts of building moon stations.
YOU SAID: "I can't help wondering what else has been kept from us."
== Well, in your case, an education has been kept from you. I don't know that I'd blame anybody in the government for that. I suppose I'd need to know more about how your education failed you so badly.
@@rockethead7 u got 2 much time on your hand 2go around typing these long stories 4 no reason but tryna be know it all.ppl that got payed to explore ain't ova here defending sum bs like u.
@@Salisburyspremiumpestcontrol
Would you like to try to write that again when you're sober? Nobody can understand a word out of you when you're high as a kite.
@@rockethead7 that's Ur best defense! U truly is a rock head.dude✌🏾🚶🏿♂️lol
@Jack Panter
During the 1960s there were plans for a lunar base, a large space station, and to land men on Mars by 1980. But then Nixon got elected, and NASA's funding started to dry up. Also the American public interest and support waned after the USA had beaten the Ruskies to the Moon. It didn't even warrant major TV network coverage by the time of Apollo 13.
We were still deep in the middle of the Cold War, and Nixon was an astute politician. If he'd had his way, Apollo 15 would have been the last mission, and it would have cost him little loss of votes. But Apollo 20 was cancelled in January 1970, and within a year Apollos 15 and 19 were cancelled. A16 to A18 were renumbered A15 to A17. No money, no missions.
Your realisation that it was all "a big lie" is not based on empirical evidence or research, it's founded on your mistrust of government. You're looking for reasons for that mistrust, but you're digging a dry well when it comes to the Apollo program.
With respect I suggest you learn more about how so much was achieved in so short a time. Dig deep. Learn about the character of those involved. Strive to understand why America retreated to LEO manned missions only. Know that we didn't give up on space exploration. We just stopped spending so much.
We learned much from the Apollo program, and it was a tremendous boost the US internal economy. Of the billions that were spent on the program, most of that went to pay employees salaries. But there were multiple other benefits. Arms races always result in accelerated progress.
So the choice is yours. Either learn more and advance, or accept conspiracy theories, and by not advancing in an ever advancing world, get left behind in ignorance. Even the Amish use telephones when needed 🙂
Anyone see the moon yesterday at 4 in the morning. What a beautiful sight. Pure reddish bronze full moon just hanging out on the very edge of the horizon, moving at speeds fast enought that you can miss your camera shot if you hesitate
Can You believe, Earth is actually not flat, and moon position depends on your location, not to mention things like time difference?
I did in Edmonton Alberta 👍
Lol ....I don't even know where to start with this.... someone needs some basic science, as well as common sense and observational skills
Clever lunatic.
Damn it, we were never there in the first place!
You reality denying science haters are pathetic!
Maybe learn how to do real research, you probably don't know how.
@@Mike588
As I stated, your sort are pathetic!
Oops, sorry, I misread your comment!
@@CNCmachiningisfun didn't mean you.
But that's okay.
I made mistakes like that too.
@@Mike588
It was the similarity in your names that caught me out.
I should have gone to Specsavers ; ) .
Fantastic... can anyone explain how they air conditioned temperatures between-20 to 200C? Where can I view any air conditioning technology close to that level of performance?
Lets also explain oxygen supplies?
Looks like you don't know the difference between temperature and heat.
where was that 200 deg.?? In the full sun?? What was it in the shade???
Fantastic. Aaand what are you talking about, folk?
In the vaccum "temperature" does not exists. Does not make any sense. Or you means irradiaton heat, maybe? Well, beduins use umbrellas and wool with great results. Do you think a billion dollars spacecraft, or million dollars spacesuit can't handle that heat?
Anyway, where I can see all that tecnology? Well, you're here, writing skeptic shit with THAT tecnology, or, we are not ready yet, about THAT tecnology. Fuel cells. Are we ready for Hydrogen vehicles? No we are not. Who built that stuff. Oh Yes, NASA did, to achieving the greatest achievement of Mankind.
@@valentinotera3244 What??? Where do you fools come up with this nonsense?
You: "In the vaccum "temperature" does not exists."
I think you mean a vacuum in of itself has no temperature. However, an object within a vacuum most certainly will have a temperature.
@Valentino Tera ? Disinformation... the Chinese probe measured temperatures liar
@@locktotheblock7091 You are the reason National Geographic has to pop up "animation" warns in their docus.
Gus Grissom.
National treasure.
Hero.
Truth teller.
Apollo was a 🍋
It sure was. And then they fixed it.
Congratulations... you qualify to have this epitaph on your gravestone... 'his mothers one small moment with a stranger made one giant idiot for mankind'.
If we were really there 50 years ago, there would be a McDonald's and a 7-Eleven up there by now.
There is neither on the north pole, which as a location has the benefit of having an atmosphere.
If they really dove to the bottom of the ocean in 1960, there would be a McDonald's and a 7-Eleven down there by now.
Thank you for the footage of the space flight and exploration of the moon.. But why did we never go back? I've heard about some sinister things that we encountered on the moon which I was led to believe that's what this video was about.. So again, why did we never go back?
Have you spent even a single calorie trying to find the answer to this question?
Mmn 8vb nnbbnnhb
@@ArKritz84 don't think so, but if you have that knowledge, share it...
@@garyjones2582 thanks to Congress, the line of dump trucks of flaming taxpayer dollars grew shorter as the Vietman war went along. So, the Apollo program was canceled in favor of Space Shuttle development, and then came the ISS. Artemis program is looking good so far, but it's also exorbitantly expensive and progressing slowly.
@@ArKritz84 ok, well thx for your explanation.. take care....
Astonishing !
I’d be more inclined to say ‘unbelievable’ myself……🤣
We couldn't do it today and we sure as hell didn't do it in 1969
Agreed.
NASA haters ARE pathetic!
And the Nazis weren't trying to take over the world in 1940s.
And Japan wasn't trying to take over the world in 1940s
And Soviet Union wasn't trying to take over the world in 1950s 60s and 70s
And Putin isn't trying to take over as much as he can NOW
And China isn't trying to bury the U.S. now.
You think the world is Busytown with Huckle Cat and Bananas Gorilla.
What concerns me about those Apollo landing scenes is the artificial look of the hills and general background panorama. 19:15. 20:25. 21:37. 23:19. 27:30. And in one of those missions there is a wide panorama shot with the lander in it and the same panorama in another shot without the lander in it.
It's so fake it's painful that so many people still believe it, the mere fact that they would have been in such a dangerous senecio with micro meteorites radiation a vacuum and the slightest hole in the suit would be instantaneous death yet there skipping around falling all over the show and joking and messing around
Its all fake.
The problem with your "logic" is that you don't understand photography. Distant mountains that are miles in the background will not change all that much when you move a few hundred feet in the foreground. But, seeing (or not seeing) the lander within the frame WILL change when you move a few hundred feet. You can verify this yourself on Earth, you know. Take a photo of a tree that is 100 feet in front of you, and a mountain is 10 miles away in the background behind the tree. Now, go 100 feet in front of the tree (so the tree is now behind you), and now take a photo in that same direction toward the mountain. You'll barely be able see any difference in what the mountain looks like, because you've only moved 200 feet, and the mountain is 10 miles away. But, you have a picture of the tree in one photo, and no tree in the other photo, with the exact same mountain in the background.
The hills and backgrounds here look just as funny. So what's your point?
@@michaelholdeman4317 The Hollywood indoctrinated second guesser with " the point " factor. Not even worth considering.
I am first but I wanted to say your the best keep on the wook
i am totally in awe of how we as a human race did this, in a tin can, with a calculator powered guidance system, through ridiculous radiation belts - and woah ....nope, it didn't happen did it.
Maybe start to educate yourself.
Google, How did astronauts get through the van allen belt.
You may finally learn something.
mike Kalynowski the cardboard and duct tape shielded them from the deadly radiation,and the plastic gold mylar reflected the searing heat for days on end- duhhh! Educate yourself about the structural integrity of cardboard panels taped together to seal the hull against the lethal vacuum of space.....doesn’t everyone know this?!🤣🤪
@thePiercingTruth yep, sorry I missed that. Curtain rods were a valuable addition to the space program, without them, the illusion would have been nearly impossible to pull off, and to this day the exact specifications have been lost in the archives of mankind’s greatest achievement,and would be far to painful to re- enact…..But we’re definitely going back….. y’know,to figure out how the curtain rods actually worked in 1969……🤣🤣🤣
@thePiercingTruth absolutely! That 1969 golf buggy probably needs a recharge by now, but maybe Elon plugged in his jump leads on the way past….🤣
@thePiercingTruth There were no curtain rods, cardboard, plywood or scotch tape.
The LEM temperature was controlled with a reflective multi-layer thermal blanket of Mylar/Kapton and reflective passive optical coatings. The complex insulation blankets covering the module had many layers, and contact points between the layers needed to be minimized so that heat wouldn't be passed through them by conduction.
For the parts of the LEM that only needed to be a protected from sunlight, high reflectivity was the most effective approach, and those places were covered with shiny amber Mylar/ Kapton or coloured Pyromark paint. As there is no air in space to pass heat by convection, if you lower absorption of heat radiation by making surfaces that are highly reflective or emissive, insulation is very effective.
To increase the insulation properties, the Mylar/Kapton sheets were hand crinkled before blanket fabrication. This crinkling provided a path for venting and minimized contact conductance between the layers and so this was bound to make the outer layer rather uneven.
maybe the peak of our civilization has already come and gone? Saturn 5 is practically lost ancient technology now. we are so risk averse and preoccupied with "diversity" "inclusion" and "equity" that I'm not sure the best and the brightest can actually make a difference anymore.
Deep only numbers
Nobody wants to pay the costs of the programs.
@Rick Martin A good place to start is actual science and remove the tin foil hat. Everything the "debunkers" have posted has been debunked. Only an idiot would think that the Russians would let the US get by with faking it.
moontard john tavers says saturn 5 is lost ancient technology WTF! talk about clutching at straws ......maybe its just we didn't go to the moon that would seem more reasonable
@@tiredoldmechanic1791 tired old moontard theory's on why we landed on the moon lol
russians faked first man in space so that theory's flawed
and the cost doesn't explain why.... that world space travel has never before or after the moon landing reached higher than around 450 miles .but 50 years ago we went 238,000 7 times ?????? grow a brain ffs
that's why we all are still waiting for them to prove it.
Only idiots with embarrassingly terrible research methods are wondering anything of the sort.
Stay in school, champ. 🤦♂
WOW! Where did I leave those travel technology documents to the moon? It's not in the file cabinet. Maybe they fell behind the cabinet. Nope! Not there either. Where'd they go?
Are you okay?
who is operating the camera that is filming them as they drive about and walkabout? can not be from the earth as the time for the signal would be just to slow.
deaghlan finn-kelly
A remote camera was used on A15, A16 and A17 and you do see some of the footage in this video.You'e absolutely right that there is of course a time delay however it just makes filming a little more challenging rather than impossible. The astronauts also carried 16mm cameras and a lot of the footage is from that source.
Real talk
Remotely operated. Taking into account the delay of signal.
Saturn V was a great achievement for the scientists and engineers. The landing was a great achievement for Stanley Kubrick and film making. Looks dated now but it was good enough to do the job half a century ago.
rockets to nowhere... we're in a closed environment or there would be no atmosphere. rockets don't go into space because there's no space for them to go. density changes about 75 miles up. wernher von braun had Psalms 19:1 on his tomb stone.
he filmed it on the moon surface
@B4sed_Hank453 Yes wonderful wasn't it 😄
The video forgot to actually answer the question 😂
Good job,by number one
Nasa
Never Actually Sent Anyone
Probably because we never really went there in the first place.
Original then.
I wonder how stupid this comment was before it was edited.
The space program from the very beginning of President JFK's public announcement "to the moon by 1969" was for the purpose of developing an ICBM capable of delivering a nuclear weapon payload (thermonuclear bomb) via a required heavy lift rocket ... 100's of ICBM launch sites (nuclear missile silo) were built throughout the USA , in those underground silos were rockets with a thermonuclear weapon on top instead of an Apollo Command Module ...
The first Atlas ICBM was launched on June 11th 1957 well before Kenny was president.
Why have a space program to build something you already made 6 years earlier?
@@Crashed131963 ... do you really want to know why ??? ... here I'll help you understand why , search wiki "Intercontinental Ballistic Missile" , then go to "contents" , find "Cold War" in contents ... and read that ... afterwards if you wish , you may compare what my original post said to what you just read , and if you find any significant discrepancies you may correct me ...
ICBMs don't require a 3 stage Saturn V
ICBMs can (with modification) be used to deliver manned space capsules to low Earth orbit, but reaching the moon requires multiple orders of magnitude more power.
@ Dan C : If I'm honest , your reason is very stupid.
Bang- zoom- straight to the moon!
AYOO... TO THE MOON ALICE!!
I'm sorry,but did anyone ever think to question,"who,or how,we're they???able to film all of this"???I ment,when the supposed rocket is soaring thru space,for one,who filmed it???and the when they're supposed Eddy in space,who was floating next to them tapering?, Japanese tourists???I ment,c'mon people,the whole thing smells of cabbage!!!we were all just young minds when we we brain trained...
Sorry, it's really difficult to cut through your broken English, but, I certainly appreciate that you're trying. I'm sure your English is better than my [whatever your native language is]. Maybe it might be easier if you wrote this in your native language, and others could just try to translate it into English, because, unfortunately, most of your sentences don't actually mean anything. Beyond that, you also might want to tell us the timestamps on whatever clips you're asking about. It's extremely difficult to tell you who/what/how if you don't give any reference.
So when does the question in the title get answered?
we didn't go in the first place they can't mention that bit youtube will take them down lol
@Dustpanda which bit youtube taking them down lol
to go back they should have gone in first place...
They have... If you don't have enough brain cells to store knowledge
@@apratimtewari4288 You dont have enough brain cells to see what really goes on...
@@Bailey-zn2je WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU GUYS REALLY THINK THAT THE MOON LANDINGS WERE FAKED?
@@Bailey-zn2jeWHAT KIND OF DISORDER DO YOU HAVE THOUGH?
@Apratim Tewari you seem to be the one with a disorder here. Lack of intelligence, lack of critical thinking skills, extreme gullibility.... take your pick.
THAT'S ME WITH CAMERA, ON CLOSED SET IN A SMALL ROOM
I was invited to witness the launch of Apollo 14. I would suggest that any responsible Psychiatrist would tell me, "No Kevin, they didn't go through the rigamarole of launching three Men on a Saturn V just to fool you into thinking we went to the Moon."
The fact that over half of people still believe we went is pretty sad.
Exactly, I get that some people want to believe but you can't ignore the obvious.
It's truly sad. But such a safe and affective story can't go wrong really..... we know this now. 😶😯
Mainly because we did it about six times and the expense of it and the near catastrophe of Apollo 13 it really wasn't worth continuing it just to collect some Moon rock's and soil
There was a time of hopefulness in our future despite all that was going on, this buoyed us up.
Think it through, be rational about it we were in a war at the time, war is expensive. Why haven’t they gone back?
@@bullymaguire4457 Think it through. Study the history that I lived through and you'll know exactly why we didn't go back.
The question asked in the title was NEVER answered. That's a kind of "click bait". 😕 / Other than that a good Doc.
I answered it today.
30:54 was a classic. How did they achieve such amazingly timed and precision camera pan of the module blasting off from the moon from planet Earth? You’d be flat out doing it that perfectly if you had a camera man actually doing it on the moon. The more you look at this show, the more embarrassing it gets. Let the Sheeple digest it. In another 1000 years they’ll figure it out. BTW, where are the stars and Sun?
By... timing it. And, obviously, only on Apollo 15-17, which had a remotely operated camera on the rover. On Apollo 15 and 16 the rover was parked too close and they had an equipment failure respectively, and only on Apollo 17, the last attempt, did Ed Fendell get it just right. And even then, it didn't take that long for the ascent stage to move out of frame.
The stars and the sun are exactly where they're supposed to be, but not visible during the day from the lunar surface any more than from earth's surface. The sun was also there, but I hope I don't have to explain to you why they didn't point the cameras at it. Alan Bean accidentally did point the TV camera at the sun early on the Apollo 12 EVA. Didn't end well for the camera.
@@ArKritz84 The sky looks pitch black for daytime. The shadows are very long indicating the sun is not overhead but closer to setting. But wait, there’s an explanation for that too, as well as the flag perpetually fluttering fully extended when there is no atmosphere on the moon.
@@raffisekzenian2746 there’s no atmosphere, so no reason for the sky to be anything but black. Also, it’s shortly after sunrise, hence the long shadows. Lastly, the flag is moving after being handled, and for a bit longer than it would on earth, after which it doesn’t move anymore. At all. What was the explanation for that again?
they didn't have the budget for stars and sun in film studio
@@ashleysoudah yeah, NASA barely had any budget at all in the 60s. 😂
I don't understand the problem.... I've never been to the swiss alps and I don't plan on going back ?
That's right. You don't understand the problem. It's explained in this video, though.
Ain't nobody been to the moon
Get a life!
That's correct, in order to go back somewhere you need to have gone there before.o
I like the last words that were spoken on the moon by Gene Cernan, just before lighting the engine: "Jack, let's get this mother out of here!"
You guys ever see the picture of President Nixon talking with astronauts on the moon using a rotary dial phone handset. Funny shit.
What do you think he should have used instead?
@@rockethead7 radio headset would have been better. BTW they must've had some advanced technology back then compared to what we have. Very little delay. Compared to news broadcast of today with interviews and the annoying delays. I guess everything was better and faster back then. And surprisingly still no other country besides the U.S. has gone and set foot on the moon. Interesting.
"radio headset would have been better."
Why? A telephone is what all presidents used to contact any radio station anywhere in the world, simply by relaying the call through the radio transmitter. It's how they could contact ocean ships. It's how they contacted airplanes. Calls to/from Air Force 1 were done with regular telephones that were relayed through radio. Why should they do it a different way? You go right ahead and pretend everyone is "doing it wrong" though. Right. You're a telecommunications engineer, right?
"Very little delay."
You clearly do not know where the audio was being recorded. You won't hear a delay, because none is expected, when an astronaut speaks and the president answers. The delay is in the other direction, when the president speaks and the astronauts answer. And, all delays were 100% correct if you listen to the original audio. Sorry that you don't understand basic principles. Maybe you need to go back and renew that telecommunications engineering degree, eh? You seem to be stuck in 1860.
"And surprisingly still no other country besides the U.S. has gone and set foot on the moon. Interesting."
Yup, no other country has been willing to spend that kind of money on putting the 13th person onto the moon.
Yeah, you keep on pretending to understand things you don't. You're a real hero.
@@rockethead7 So in over 50 years we can't save up enough money to go back to the moon? What sense does it make to go to the moon and then decide that it is just not worth going back because of cost. We have companies within the civilian sector that are able to go into space at more than half the cost as NASA but no one talks about going back and setting foot on the moon. Really? We've seen and explored all we needed to on those 6 trips. Seems very odd to me.
"So in over 50 years we can't save up enough money to go back to the moon?"
What in the world are you talking about? Do you have any idea how NASA's programs are appropriated and funded? Who EXACTLY do you think would be "saving up"? What ARE you talking about?
"What sense does it make to go to the moon and then decide that it is just not worth going back because of cost."
Because the program's objectives were achieved. Did you think Apollo would just go on forever? How much would be enough for you? They ran Apollo from 1961 to 1972 for the moon program, and until 1975 for the Apollo applications programs such as Skylab and Apollo-Soyuz. During the height of the Apollo spending, it costed 4.5% of the entire federal budget in hard costs, and another 2% in soft costs and international support. Do you believe that sort of spending was sustainable? They managed to launch 13 Saturn V rockets during that time, including 9 manned missions to the moon, 6 of which landed. How many more do you need, in order to believe it?
"We have companies within the civilian sector that are able to go into space at more than half the cost as NASA but no one talks about going back and setting foot on the moon. Really?"
Dewdrop, what in the world is wrong with you? They ARE going back!!! The first Artemis mission already flew to the moon a couple of months ago. The second mission will take a crew. Are you honestly sitting there, pretending that the Artemis program isn't happening? Sorry, but when you know absolutely nothing about the topic, you're not in any position to doubt Apollo. I noticed you completely dropped your original topic about how phones and radios work. Why? Do you now acknowledge that a phone is the best tool to use to make that phone call? You insisted on a radio headset. How would the radio headset work in communicating with the moon? Do you think a radio headset has the range to get the signal to the moon all on its own? Or, do you think it would have to go through a relay system over to Parkes, Australia anyway? You do know that the moon was on the other side of the Earth during Apollo 11's moonwalk, right? You do know there was no direct line of sight between the White House and the moon, right? You do know that they'd need to relay it to Parkes no matter what, right? So, why wouldn't a phone work for that?
"We've seen and explored all we needed to on those 6 trips. Seems very odd to me."
Oh, quit your ridiculous pretending. You have no idea what you're talking about. You don't know enough about the topic to know what's odd or what's not.
In 1969, The US mooned the whole world on TV.
😅😂👏👏
I sleep on the moon every night. P. S I have named my bed MOON
All of Apollo mission telemetry is lost and we supposedly went to the moon on our first try with the computing power of a pocket calculator…..
Bull butter
*_"All of Apollo mission telemetry is lost"_*
No it isn't.
*_"and we supposedly went to the moon on our first try"_*
Apollos 8 and 10 had already travelled to the moon.
*_"with the computing power of a pocket calculator…"_*
You clearly have no comprehension whatsoever of computer science or the design of the Apollo computing systems. I can explain this to you if you wish.
Reality is not contingent upon what you fail to understand.
All of the telemetry was not lost.
The spacecraft computers had a performance comparable to the first generation of personal computers like the Apple 2 and Commodore 64 and were only required to number crunch in a linear way, the information worked out on the main frames at NASA, which was then beamed up to the spacecraft by radio telescope. They did not need the power for touch screens or to hold graphics etc like today’s smartphones.
Cause we've never been there. Astronaut confessed. 😂
Agreed.
NASA haters ARE pathetic!
@•
There was NO such 'confession'.
Roberto is a LIAR, as are all NASA haters.
An astronaut confessed? Pffttt. Which astronaut? When? Why isn't this front page news? Why aren't there congressional hearings? Why isn't that astronaut on trial? Let me guess, a conspiracy video told you an astronaut confessed, and you just believe it, right?
@@rockethead7 you also believed that 911 was the Arabs? 😂
@@CNCmachiningisfun you also believed that the 911 was Arabs? 😂
After watching this video, i am a born again believer in Americas ability to land on the moon 🌙👏
In order to go back to a place you had to been there before at least once.
You are a wiser person than 80% of the people on this planet. Congratulations
james5780 ...I would bet the ratio is closer to 50/50. Whatever statistics you are reading were probably gathered at an astronaut book signing event...
Horky Fenorky I wish 50% of the people I know knew the truth, 99% of them are brainwashed. I hope your right that It is 50%, that would mean mostly people have sense which I just don’t see
james5780 ..And people are terrible...I went to great lengths to return a man’s wallet I found at a gas station. Cash and credit cards, driver’s license intact.. He was so rude, even acted like I was at fault in some way.........Then yesterday, I saw an older lady getting in her vehicle at exactly the same spot at the gas station where I found the wallet, and her rear wheel was laying in at the top, fwd, so it was a bad bearing assembly. I was trying to explain to her how dangerous it was to drive it. All I got was mean scowl and she acted angry, mumbling in audibly....and she slammed her door and drove away.... Cursed area? Or are people actually this far gone????? I quit.
james5780 ...almost forgot. I also got a shotgun pointed at me AT THAT EXACT SAME SPOT several years ago. A crazy drunk man. Got him arrested at a Hardee’s down the road. He was firing above some girl’s head when the police arrived.
Moon landing was filmed at Cannon air force base, Clovis, New Mexico
In an impossibly large, impossibly lit, 1/6th gravity vacuum sound stage? Yeah, that stands up to scrutiny…
@@ArKritz84 they connected 2 large air plain hangers and dumped big trucks of sands there. We still can’t exit earth orbit with manned rocket. Space station and anything involved with astronauts is just about 250 miles above us in earth orbit.
@@plato2030 connecting two air*plane* hang*a*rs doesn’t address ANY of my objections.
@@plato2030
*_"they connected 2 large air plain hangers and dumped big trucks of sands there."_*
Fascinating. "They" dumped truckloads of sand into two large aircraft hangars which supposedly replicated the lighting and 1/6th gravity of the moon and a vacuum - and no one noticed. And in so doing, they also managed to precisely recreate with their dumper trucks of sand, Theophilus in The Sea of Tranquility; the Head Crater vicinity, Ocean of Storms; the Fra Mauro Formation near Cone Crater; the eastern edge of Mare Imbrium, Hadley Rille; The Descartes Highlands; and the eastern edge of Mare Serenitati in the Taurus Littrow Valley. Plus, their special effects department managed to create a third of a ton of moon rock in addition to 2,200 lunar samples that somehow managed to fool and withstand the analytical scrutiny worldwide of an entire independent branch of science called geology. Oh, and in addition to all this, they managed to fake a three stage 363ft tall Saturn V rocket producing 7.5 million lbs of thrust in addition to the testimonies of the several million people on the Florida coastline that witnessed the launches first hand.
Yeah - sounds plausible.
Incidentally, I think you meant 'planes' and 'hangars'.
@@yassassin6425 Yes, and LBJ has also managed to be in two places at one 🙄
Don't time right now, but I'll definitely watch it later with a drink.
Bump so you don't forget to do it, I'm halfway through and it's quite a jewel of a documentary
This is SWEET,,,,,,,,,
Wow WOWWWWWIE
this gives me
GOOSEBUMPS
!!!!!!!!
CELEBRATING CELEBRATION of the FAKE MOON LANDINGS 🌙
Nasa
Need
Another
Special-Effect
Already
Congratulations... you qualify to have this epitaph on your gravestone... 'his mothers one small moment with a stranger made one giant idiot for mankind'.
🌎 🌏 🌐 🌍 🌎 🌏 🌐
Do you get it yet?
"If you believe they put a man on the moon"
Enough said
Belief is not required.
To think 1960s technology did all that! We should be dancing on the rings of Saturn by now.
Take it up with congress. They're the ones who put the brakes on that stuff. But, if you thought the Apollo missions were expensive, I can't even imagine the cost of dancing on Saturn's rings.
@@rockethead7 hahahaha! I guess I'm jaded in a sense that we try to go to the friggen moon when all that money could be used for something useful. Like curing a disease.
Well, you're not alone. The reason Apollo was canceled after Apollo 17 was largely because, yes, congress didn't want to spend that money on moon missions, and wanted to spend it on other things. But, the reason Apollo happened at all was basically (long story short) to prevent WWIII. It was an expression of technological dominance over the Soviets, to keep the cold war cold, and not give the Soviets a reason to think they'd have a shot at winning an actual war. It was a message. "Mess with us, and we're going to beat you, we will always beat you." So, if you want to get philosophical, well, the Apollo missions may have prevented millions of deaths in a possible nuclear war. So, I'd say that reason was good enough. But, yeah, I can't tell you the reason for Artemis, other than Trump wanted some glory if he had gotten a 2nd term. He'll still get the glory akin to Kenney's, because Artmis was approved by congress under Trump's pressure. And, Biden certainly isn't going to stop spending money. Spending money is the name of the game, when trying to prevent a recession and in a post pandemic economy. So, the money will keep flowing to every single project possible. But, from a technical standpoint, I'm not all that sure it'll justify the total cost. But, yeah, it's happening.
@rockethead7 good points. Esp where Biden will keep spending. They are out of control and killing me.
@@joeb2588
Well, believe me, I'm no fan of Biden (nor Trump, nor Obama, nor etc.), and I don't agree with the level of spending and basically what boils down to printing money. But, today's economic environment is more complex than any known time in the USA's history. Normally, inflation runs rampant when productivity is super-high, and government spending is also super-high. But, this is a weird one now, because productivity is super-low, and government spending is super-high. Anybody who has taken an Economics 101 class would say that today's economy isn't even financially possible. Yet, here we are. I'm not sure if anybody has much of a choice other than to keep spending. And, well, I guess I'm "ok" (sigh) with it, as long as the other countries are doing the same. We don't want to devalue the dollar in the international market. But, yeah, if government spending outpaces the increase in personal income, yeah, that's a bubble that's going to burst sooner or later. I think the only course of action any of us really has is to keep on trying to invest in our own productivity, and make the most of our money, and ride the storm. Again, I don't quite agree with the level of government spending and money printing right now, but, there'd still need to be quite a bit of this under any president, just maybe not to this extent.
Cool
There is a problem, Buzz wasnt the first person on the moon, the camera man was. He was filming from the moon as they were landing…. Lmao
Buzz said on Conan “You didnt watch us land, you watched a simulation”
That were was no external view of the landing, which is what Aldrin was referring to. And Armstrong was the first person on the moon, not Aldrin.
Buss Aldrin, Joe Biden, hard to tell 'em apart once they start speaking.
I seen the first, The last launch. Now i will see a new version. Thank you Pioneers of humanity.
No one has been to the moon.
@@damonejohnson6098 you goose.
Look up bill kaysing and bart sibrel. Then look up buzz aldrin in class in a primary school. Look up shadows onnthe moon. They didnt go as they would have died on the way. Due to the van allen belts
Look up Dr Van Allen - you will find you are wrong.
Nasa is still working on how to get through the belts, funny that
@@chubbyroyston3880 If you would like the NASA presentation "Orion Trial by Fire" explaining in simple terms so that you can correctly understand its content please do ask.
@@martinc3918 id love to read that or view it if on video.... to see how much the van Allen belts play in the scenario.
Kaysing was and Sibrel is a numpty. High energy protons are the main types of ionising particles in the Van Allen belts along with electrons, and not electromagnetic waves e.g. ultraviolet, infrared, gamma etc. Electrons can pass through living tissue without creating much damage as they are very small. The ISS at times passes through the Van Allen belts and so did Gemini 10 and 11 in 1966. In 1968 the Russian Zond 5 sent a number of biological samples around the Moon and back, including two turtles and these specimens were recovered alive upon their return to Earth.
I think we are all nuts for wanting to find aliens and want them to find us
I have met many aliens when I visit other countries.
@@Emy53 When you're in another country, it's you who is the alien.
At this point what have we got to lose?
Thank you! Great presentation! A high salute to ALL those who helped with this mission! And to the astronauts and scientist who made this great journey!
Bless your heart
They demonstrated how they escaped the rocket just before launch…
@@Paul-md1dc 😂
@@Paul-md1dc oh my goodness
Great journey to your face!!!!!
Why We Haven't Gone Back To The Moon? You never went in the first place 🤣🤣🤣
🤡
The astronauts never went to the Moon they went to the desert and was digging sand and called it moondust
Sand that dates back 4+ billion years old, and has never been exposed to oxygen and moisture. Yeah. Sure.
We went to the Moon? I always thought it was a Stanley Kubrick film.
Well, if you actually did think that, you were wrong.
Looks like they forgot the cameraman on the moon while shooting the launch
You mean the remote controlled camera on the LRV operated by Ed Fendell in Houston?
@@yassassin6425 remote digital camera? or good old 1960's camera with solid film inside...if so how possible to have it back on earth?
@@stalri4170 What?
The colour television cameras mounted to the Lunar Rovers were provided by RCA communicated with the Earth using a high-gain antenna on the rover. These television cameras could transmit footage directly to Earth via the Lunar Communications Relay Unit (an antenna) using the power sources aboard the rovers. Researchers and scientists on Earth could even remotely-control the television cameras to examine the lunar surface for themselves and track the astronauts when they parked their rovers to explore nearby areas on foot. It used a field-sequential color system, and a ground-station signal processing and color decoding techniques to produce a broadcast NTSC color video signal.
There was a slight time delay for the radio waves to travel (a couple of seconds) between the Earth and the Moon. Engineers suggested moving the rover a certain distance from the lunar module (it had been too close to capture Apollo 16, and the tilt mechanism failed for Apollo 15). The setting on the camera was instructed to automatically tilt to show the lunar liftoff when commanded from Earth. A controller called Ed Fendall punched in pre-set commands that needed to be precisely sent to compensate for the delay.
@@stalri4170 It was a remote control TV camera.
@@gunternetzer9621 As he and all the moron conspiritards keep asking and have no intention of remembering or accepting. You get the same sort of brainless repetition of questions with flat Earthers, 9/11 deniers and other conspiracy driven fanciful beliefs.
“Nothing can be loved or hated unless it is first understood.” ― Leonardo da Vinci.
Wrong. Racism is a prime example of hatred based on the absence of factual information. And loving a blonde with big tits based on appearances alone says the same.
Numbskull
WELL LETS ASK HIM LEONARDO !!!!! READY LETS ASK HIM
'Cos, we never went?
Nasa
Never Actually
Sent Astronauts
Congratulations... you qualify to have this epitaph on your gravestone... 'his mothers one small moment with a stranger made one giant idiot for mankind'.
Must have been a surreal experience?!!
❤️💙👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👌🏻🤜🏻💥🤛🏻
Surreal. Not sure real. Good point.
@@frisbee544
Nonsence ! They was really there🤷🏼♂️
Amazing that so much was accomplished so long ago, can't wait to see what is next!
LOL!.....Staged
@@wilbertkendal2524 Meaningless comment. The mark of the Troll.
They will struggle now there's no nazi SS majors to help
@@apolloskyfacer5842 Nah....Its the mark of the truth. Anybody with an ounce of common sense knows that man didn't go to the Moon. It was all a big 'FAKE'.
Never been to the moon
Have we really been on Moon? Landscape looks like some in Nevada!
They did but there was sensitive evidence structures some say even ufo parked near craters I myself believe they did reach the moon but couldnt afford us seeing what's really up there we are the sheep dont spook the herd type situation
@@Ryzo223 I guess will know more when they make next trip.
No they did not go to the moon, its all made up...
@@Ryzo223 The current thought is that if the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations and visitation was revealed, it would be far more disruptive to the elites than to the masses.
Man, If only Kubrick were alive to see how much better the moon fakery got with "Artemis".
Man, if only you could see how predictable your damage control is with Artemis.
Advancing technology is proving the moon landing was pure theatrical.
advances in technology is proving there are a few flat earth nutters still around...
How is that?
Moon lander docking with the return capsule was never practiced in the earth orbit. The lander never successfully landed on earth during development. Just study the space station dockings, for your answer.
"Moon lander docking with the return capsule was never practiced in the earth orbit."
That's not true. In fact, it was tested on the Apollo 9 flight in earth orbit.
The priority during this flight was the CSM and LM rendezvous and docking.
"The lender never successfully landed on earth during development."
It was not designed to operate in the earth's atmosphere.
Watch the CBS Live Coverage of Apollo 9 docking on YT, they never lift the same orbit. Lift off from the moon and meeting up and docking would be highly questionable without training.
U can't go back were u never went.....