Jesus is God? AI debates Christian vs. Muslim

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12 тис.

  • @JonOleksiuk
    @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +297

    Thanks for watching our debate on the New Testament! What did you think? Share your thoughts in the comments, and check out these other thought-provoking debates:
    • AI debates The TRINITY - 👉 ua-cam.com/video/S0ScOgaDdNE/v-deo.html
    • Was the New Testament CORRUPTED? 👉 ua-cam.com/video/EkiLOWPdDAg/v-deo.html
    • Muhammad, Jesus, Buddha: AI Judges MORAL Legacies 👉 ua-cam.com/video/eY_il2MZjxc/v-deo.html
    🔔 Thanks again for watching! Don’t forget to subscribe and hit the bell so you never miss the next debate!

    • @celestialknight2339
      @celestialknight2339 5 місяців тому +21

      This is such an awesome video! Kudos to you for thinking this up. The only critiques I have (towards the AI) are as follows:
      • They could sometimes get quite repetitive. It starts out flexible & diverse, but the discussion quickly begins to go in circles.
      • They make lots of assumptions such as the validity of the Bible or Qur’an as historical sources, without questioning them. For example, John’s Gospel (which made up the bulk of discussion) isn’t even a historically reliable source according to most scholars, and it was written very late and even contradicts the previous gospels (which completely lack the ‘I Am’ statements of Jesus’ alleged divinity). Or, consider that Paul wasn’t even a disciple to begin with, yet the Christian AI readily quoted his writings as if they are authoritative. The Muslim AI should’ve questioned this, especially since there’s a stark contrast between the teachings of Jesus versus the teachings of Paul.
      The list can go on - but overall I found this stimulating, fun, educational, and highly enjoyable. Thanks for posting, and I can’t wait to see more videos like this!
      Peace,
      Your friendly Muslim viewer
      *_”And do not debate with the People of the Bible, except in the most polite & dignified manner.”_* ~ _The Qur’an __29:46_ ❤

    • @TheKoldfusion7
      @TheKoldfusion7 5 місяців тому +6

      I'd love to see an additional model trained on Judaica participating in a sort of round table debate with all of these.

    • @jaylinn416
      @jaylinn416 5 місяців тому +7

      This was very interesting!

    • @jaylinn416
      @jaylinn416 5 місяців тому +23

      You should ask the Muslim AI whether Mohammed is a moral man! LOL

    • @jaylinn416
      @jaylinn416 5 місяців тому

      The muslim AI may say, well... other than pedophilia, numerous murders, armed robberies, slave trafficking, rape of captured slaves, torture of prisoners, etc., Mohammed was a very moral man of his time! LOL

  • @lovespeaks777
    @lovespeaks777 5 місяців тому +2732

    But they never got mad and screamed at each other 😂😂

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +302

      Ha. Exactly! After watching human emotion derail so many debates it was refreshing to hear point, counterpoint… not perfect, but hopefully headed in the right direction. I even programmed a line that said “at times, you get frustrated with your opponent…” to test if they would break with their respectful discourse.

    • @lovespeaks777
      @lovespeaks777 5 місяців тому +40

      @@JonOleksiukHaha. Very cool idea, my friend!

    • @kmnzen6692
      @kmnzen6692 5 місяців тому +16

      The judge also very smart in giving results. 🤣

    • @jcyc5101
      @jcyc5101 5 місяців тому +32

      The muslim ai about to mad😂😂😂

    • @observer8477
      @observer8477 5 місяців тому +13

      cause they dont care,they dont have a soul at stake,hah!

  • @Christ_TheWay
    @Christ_TheWay 5 місяців тому +6848

    Muslims quote the Bible while also claiming that the Bible is corrupt.

    • @ayinlaoriyomi2517
      @ayinlaoriyomi2517 5 місяців тому +588

      That mentality always makes me laugh

    • @kierinsusukaii4745
      @kierinsusukaii4745 5 місяців тому +8

      ironic christians do the same thing to jews

    • @sonseed7541
      @sonseed7541 5 місяців тому +71

      @markstein2845 u quote bc it hat u believe?

    • @sonseed7541
      @sonseed7541 5 місяців тому +46

      @@ayinlaoriyomi2517 no iq

    • @sonseed7541
      @sonseed7541 5 місяців тому

      bc christians dont quote quran?

  • @Noxictyz
    @Noxictyz 5 місяців тому +664

    Please do another where the AI' can argue with historical and archelogical evidence outside the texts. Allow the christian ai to use early church fathers and the cathecism and the muslim to use hadiths.

    • @yelrahkcorb
      @yelrahkcorb 5 місяців тому +63

      Yes! All evidence outside the Bible and Quran would be awesome.

    • @ZIKBK
      @ZIKBK 5 місяців тому +74

      The problem with that is that islamic evidence would get destroyed by Christianic evidence compiled so this would be better

    • @yelrahkcorb
      @yelrahkcorb 5 місяців тому +65

      @@ZIKBK I think I would rather watch Islamic evidence get destroyed. I mean it happens in nearly every video posted online but it never gets old!

    • @ZIKBK
      @ZIKBK 5 місяців тому +36

      @@yelrahkcorb true, even if you base it from a non religious point of view, Christianity has much more scriptures and testimonies each to their own language unchanged with meaning for the bible while Islam needs extra books to "complete" the Qur'an while Muslims argue if the hadiths are true or not

    • @yelrahkcorb
      @yelrahkcorb 5 місяців тому

      @@ZIKBK Yeah they always claim we have more than one Bible and it’s changed all the time when none of them agree on the multiple Hadiths they have and every single 13+ Qurans they have for different countries have changed words that change the actual theology of it and if you go to a country with the wrong Quran you can actually lose your life for it.

  • @nelsoncontreras7047
    @nelsoncontreras7047 2 місяці тому +423

    I am a simple man, I eat , I sleep, I work 9 to 5, and I pray to Jesus Christ.

    • @ninjastudio4034
      @ninjastudio4034 2 місяці тому +7

      Not enough but better than a muslim

    • @d.l.3310
      @d.l.3310 2 місяці тому

      😊 love that ❤

    • @bankroll_gotti99
      @bankroll_gotti99 2 місяці тому +21

      May Allah guide you to the right path 🤲🏽

    • @ninjastudio4034
      @ninjastudio4034 2 місяці тому

      @@bankroll_gotti99 your allah isn't God , is Satan

    • @ninjastudio4034
      @ninjastudio4034 2 місяці тому

      @@bankroll_gotti99 i've studied both Christianity and muslim religion , every bit from it and I can confirm and even proove islam is a Satanic religion.

  • @jasonhubbard7409
    @jasonhubbard7409 5 місяців тому +789

    This was amazing. They didn’t even call each other Hitler. Not even once.
    …I didn’t know online debate could do that.

    • @I.Kat.
      @I.Kat. 5 місяців тому

      Hitler loved Islam. 😂😂😂

    • @user-je3sk8cj6g
      @user-je3sk8cj6g 4 місяці тому +10

      That's how you know they are AI

    • @thezyreick4289
      @thezyreick4289 4 місяці тому +2

      it was ai not human.

    • @nomylearnspalestine
      @nomylearnspalestine 4 місяці тому +1

      o

    • @hustlinao1488
      @hustlinao1488 4 місяці тому

      The Apostle Paul the Roman General that persecuted GODS people, would make Hitlers evil look like misdemeanors

  • @christianeddins2904
    @christianeddins2904 5 місяців тому +1208

    Notice how 90% of the conversation relies on Muslim Ai attacking authenticity of the Bible whilst Christian AI is mainly in defense. The foundation of the argument seems to be based on the Bible which is interesting. I would like to see the algorithm switch roles and add some offence from Christian AI on authenticity of the Quran as the main foundation of the Argument.

    • @christianeddins2904
      @christianeddins2904 5 місяців тому +75

      My presumption is that the reason it is not based on the Quran is because if it were, the arguments would not be as evenly distributed based on the foundational Morals/Contradiction in the Quran compared to the Bible.

    • @anthonymotture
      @anthonymotture 5 місяців тому +74

      Yes because that was the AI’s task to disprove the divinity of Jesus.

    • @Alf_The_Gr8
      @Alf_The_Gr8 5 місяців тому +88

      The Quran affirms the Bible (INJEEL) yet the Bible doesn't affirm the Quran. Therefore the Christian has no need to prove anything of the Quran , rather just disprove it using the scripture, as the Quran commands the people of the book. Don't be salty when the dawah gpt script crumbles.

    • @thagreatadante
      @thagreatadante 5 місяців тому

      Because there would be a Fatwah issued to kill such an Ai on sight if it challenged the Quran's authenticity .

    • @lebong76
      @lebong76 5 місяців тому

      You should put the quran against the bible you can only use your own book as the quran states its got all the answers

  • @kujo734
    @kujo734 5 місяців тому +1513

    How can the koran know more about Jesus when it was written 600 years after He lived?
    The New Testament was written by first-hand eyewitnesses.

    • @SpiritualSafar.
      @SpiritualSafar. 5 місяців тому +212

      Because it is from God

    • @johnbee4557
      @johnbee4557 5 місяців тому +380

      @@SpiritualSafar.actually it’s from a self proclaimed illiterate

    • @getgood386
      @getgood386 5 місяців тому +79

      ​@@johnbee4557agree 👍💯

    • @getgood386
      @getgood386 5 місяців тому

      ​@@SpiritualSafar.Your prophet is sick and dated a 9 year old . My God Jesus Christ was perfect

    • @ZenThruAnger
      @ZenThruAnger 5 місяців тому +157

      Yeah, it would be odd that God came to deliver the Koran 600 years later to clarify that Jesus was not representing himself as God, but that he was just another messenger. I like the Christian God better because he won't get all psycho on you and kill you for trying to draw a picture of him.😂

  • @Mr_DragonzBaNNe
    @Mr_DragonzBaNNe 2 місяці тому +69

    Never argue on 2 topics:
    1:Politics.
    2:Religion.
    ~ A Wise Man

    • @RealEpya
      @RealEpya Місяць тому +12

      and 3: football
      (turkish addition)

    • @arielthemermaid3576
      @arielthemermaid3576 23 дні тому +5

      Ok, I’ll be sure not to bring up “relogion” while I’m arguing about religion.

    • @AsafeFialho
      @AsafeFialho 22 дні тому +5

      That's not wise at all. Society depends on these to work.

  • @deezn2856
    @deezn2856 5 місяців тому +3719

    JESUS CHRIST IS THE TRUTH!!! ✝️✝️✝️

    • @djjinerson
      @djjinerson 5 місяців тому +107

      The way

    • @morganclare4704
      @morganclare4704 5 місяців тому +48

      John 14:6

    • @Mr.EdwardSmith
      @Mr.EdwardSmith 5 місяців тому +94

      @@djjinerson and the life

    • @nickstrickland4751
      @nickstrickland4751 5 місяців тому +13

      @@djjinersonYou guys forget the end of that statement, No man comes to the father by through me, the central issue is not Yeshua it’s Yehovah, Yeshua isYehovahs provision by who we go through to have a restored relationship with the father.

    • @tiredofmedialying
      @tiredofmedialying 5 місяців тому +59

      Muslims keep seeing Jesus in visions and converting. That should tell everyone that he is real.

  • @timelesstales404
    @timelesstales404 3 місяці тому +567

    This can't be a Muslim Ai because before replying each question it didn't say, " Sister asked a very good question."

    • @Hannestv4607
      @Hannestv4607 3 місяці тому +6

      *What your imams don't tell you*
      Allah himself testifies that he has a son and he is the son as Christians understand it! Only the Koran writer was too ignorant to know what Son of God means! Allah's word which created everything is Allah himself too! *The Word Allahs which created everything is the Son of God according to Christianity!*

    • @Hannestv4607
      @Hannestv4607 3 місяці тому

      *What your imams don't tell you*
      Son of God does not mean that God has a child in Christianity!
      *this is a mistake in the Qur'an!*

    • @guledabdi9939
      @guledabdi9939 3 місяці тому +6

      @@Hannestv4607 brother i dont think u know what ur sayin. 1 show me where Allah(swt) testifies this, 2 the writer of the Quran is Allah(swt) bro, then it was revealed to the prohpet(pbuh)

    • @Hannestv4607
      @Hannestv4607 3 місяці тому

      My friend. Are you saying that the Word of Allah does not exist according to the Quran?
      The Word of Allah is the Son of God!
      Son of God does not mean that God has a child!

    • @Hannestv4607
      @Hannestv4607 3 місяці тому

      Hebr 1,2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, *by whom also he made the worlds;*
      as everyone can see the term Son of God refers to the Word of God = god himself! For through that God created the worlds! *this is a mistake in the Qur'an!*

  • @flaming3624
    @flaming3624 5 місяців тому +774

    Sam Shamoun vs AI would go hard

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +212

      I’d like to test one human in the debate. Maybe that could be arranged one day.

    • @celestialknight2339
      @celestialknight2339 5 місяців тому +22

      @@JonOleksiuk Agreed. The AI would easily destroy his non-existent career in about 12 seconds.

    • @201950201950
      @201950201950 5 місяців тому +56

      Are there any contradictions in Islam. Unlike the AI Sam would point those out.

    • @201950201950
      @201950201950 5 місяців тому +17

      I guess the Christian AI was not programmed in polemics.

    • @CosmicalChrist
      @CosmicalChrist 5 місяців тому +26

      ​@@celestialknight2339
      Well, since humans have tried and failed, let's try Ai

  • @mahino420
    @mahino420 2 місяці тому +98

    the point system is weird here, i dont follow either religion but the muslim AI would respond with logic somertimes then the christian AI quotes scripture and get more points, its irritating
    for example when the muslim AI said at the start of the debate why does god need to take a human form to forgive sin the AI quotes a bible verse that means you need to sacrifice blood to forgive sin but the answer doesnt have any logical merit to it and doesn't answer the muslim AI question yet got more points than it

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  2 місяці тому +24

      to clarify, these models were asked to debate the question using the scriptures as their reference, that's why all the scripture verses were used.

    • @leodavinci8935
      @leodavinci8935 2 місяці тому +20

      ​@@JonOleksiuk The trinity concept didn't exist in the entire bible. Even Paul didn't believe in the trinity. I'm using Chatgpt, before I ask certain questions there is no input about any religions. The AI always chose Islam. Why? Because the Bible didn't promote your doctrine. Jesus never preach about trinity neither original sin. He himself didn't want to die. He himself have a God (John 20:17). How can God have a God?

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  2 місяці тому +8

      Good questions. i actually had the models do a whole debate on that subject. here it is if you want to learn more about both sides of the argument
      ua-cam.com/video/S0ScOgaDdNE/v-deo.html

    • @ChirstInTheDistance
      @ChirstInTheDistance Місяць тому +1

      But both the question and the answer given would be considered Illogical, from an evolutionist worldview.
      So I don't see how a person without a creationists worldview would consider either of those logical.

    • @mahino420
      @mahino420 Місяць тому +2

      @@ChirstInTheDistance its just logic not creationist vs evolutionist logic there is only 1 type of logic and its called logic

  • @jimmahbee
    @jimmahbee 5 місяців тому +651

    There’s one small problem… The Bible clearly says, and it was written before the Quran that if we are an angel preach any other message any other gospel let them be acursed… this is exactly what happened with the Muslim faith… While in a cave, Mohammed, was accosted by supposedly the Angel Gabriel, and given a new gospel. this completely contradicts what was just written

    • @vivelamusiquereggaejazzblu3509
      @vivelamusiquereggaejazzblu3509 4 місяці тому +35

      Allah means God in Arabic.
      In the God cited 25 among the thousands.
      The 25 prophets cited are:
      Adam (Adam)
      Idriss (Enoch)
      Nouh (Noah)
      Houd
      Salih
      Ibrahim (Abraham)
      Ismâ’îl (Sam)
      Is-hâq (Isaac)
      Ya’qoub (Jacob)
      Lut (Lot)
      Youssuf (Joseph)
      Ayyoub (Job)
      Chu’ayb
      Moussa (Moses)
      Haroun (Aaron)
      Dhou-Lkifl
      Dawoud (David)
      Sulayman (Solomon)
      Ilyas (Elijah)
      Alyassa’ (Elisha)
      Younus (Jonas)
      Zakariyyae (Zacharia)
      Yahya (John)
      ‘Issa (Jesus)
      Muhammad ﷺ
      Each messenger had a specific mission from God. For example: Abraham, Noah, Jonah, Jesus and Muhammad are all messengers but are not necessarily in the same geographical location. Each Prophet, with the realities of the people of his time.
      I know that some will tell me that Jesus is a God. I refer you to the Bible.
      John 5 30:
      I can do nothing of myself: as I hear, I judge; and my judgment is right, because I seek not my own will, but the will of him who sent me.
      John 15, 26
      And Jesus said, "When the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who is from the Father, he will testify of me;"
      In the Quran Surah 19
      we
      16
      Mentions, in the Book (the Quran), Maryam (Mary), when she withdrew from her family to a place towards the East.
      17
      She put a veil between herself and them. We sent her Our Spirit (Jibril [Gabriel]), who presented himself to her in the form of a perfect man.
      18
      She said: “I take refuge from you with the Most Merciful. If you are pious, [do not approach me]. »
      19
      He said: “I am indeed a Messenger of your Lord to give you the gift of a pure son. »
      20
      She said: “How can I have a son, when no man has touched me, and I am not a prostitute? »
      21
      He said, “So shall it be!” This is easy for Me, says your Lord! And We will make him a sign to the people, and a mercy from Us. It's a matter already decided. »
      22
      So she became pregnant [with the child], and she withdrew with him to a distant place.
      23
      Then the pains of childbirth brought her to the trunk of the palm tree, and she said: “Woe is me! That I had died before this moment! And that I was totally forgotten! »
      24
      Then he called to her from beneath her, saying, “Do not be distressed. Your Lord has placed a spring at your feet.
      25
      Shake the trunk of the palm tree towards you: it will make fresh and ripe dates fall on you.
      26
      So eat and drink and let your eyes rejoice! If you see anyone from among humans, say [to him:]: “Assuredly, I have vowed a fast to the Most Merciful: therefore I will not speak today to any human being. »
      27
      Then she came to her people carrying him [the baby]. They said: “O Maryam (Mary), you have done a monstrous thing!
      28
      “Sister of Hârûn, your father was not an evil man and your mother was not a prostitute. »
      29
      She then gestured towards him [the baby]. They said, “How should we speak to a baby in the cradle? »
      30
      But (the baby) said: “I am truly the servant of Allah. He gave me the Book and appointed me Prophet.
      31
      Wherever I am, He has made me blessed; and He recommended to me, as long as I live, prayer and Zakat;
      32
      and kindness to my mother. He didn't make me violent or unhappy.
      33
      And peace be upon me on the day I was born, and on the day I die, and on the day I am raised alive. »
      34
      Such is 'Isa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary): word of truth, of which they doubt.

    • @jimmahbee
      @jimmahbee 4 місяці тому +63

      @@M.ArsalanKhan-gs6zp there’s tons of evidence… Josephus the historian as well as many other living not too long after Jesus comment on His life. In fact there’s at least as much writing about Him as Cesar. In fact there are writings from Roman officials to one another about His life.

    • @Keemin
      @Keemin 4 місяці тому

      @@M.ArsalanKhan-gs6zp As someone who was once a very strong atheist who would often debate my christian colleagues in academic institutions, the argument that Jesus did not exist is something no atheist worth their salt has ever attempted to defend. Jesus of Nazareth is a historical figure with numerous corroborating accounts that solidify him in non-religious, impartial academic historical literature as a prominent speaker and religious leader of Jewish descent. Even Jesus's crucifixion is well-documented abiblically. Just read through the Wikipedia page on "Sources for the historicity of Jesus" if you want to educate yourself, and you can see the cited literature if you wish to go deeper than that.

    • @ywwb
      @ywwb 4 місяці тому +66

      @@vivelamusiquereggaejazzblu3509bro give it up. Did you watch the vid? Your Muslim AI got destroyed by facts, logic, and God’s scripture. Go get baptized bro Jesus is king forever and ever.

    • @ywwb
      @ywwb 4 місяці тому +18

      @@M.ArsalanKhan-gs6zpeyewitness testimony. Also your lack of knowledge doesn’t equate to a lack or evidence, you just gotta go and do your research honestly.

  • @Benozo17
    @Benozo17 5 місяців тому +685

    Notice how the Muslim AI uses the Bible to support its arguments than later in the end says it's changed, secondly the Christian AI never uses the Quran for its arguments, always refers back to the Bible. The Bible can hold its own while the other uses the Bible to justify its claim rather than later say it's changed when it doesn't fit its argument.

    • @AbuHira54
      @AbuHira54 5 місяців тому

      Machines can understand only what you tell them, that's what you tell her to speak, coming to your comment 'muslims use the bible to support their argument' you are wrong brother, we don't need bible to support our argument we have the evidence that no one can stand against it, we only tell you what you haven't read from it(bible), next time you are better to read your Bible very well, you are far away to compete with Quran

    • @josiahserrano6651
      @josiahserrano6651 5 місяців тому +2

      @@AbuHira54 what evidence?

    • @christopherarthur3007
      @christopherarthur3007 5 місяців тому

      ​@@josiahserrano6651 Muslims should stop quoting the Bible when debating since they hold to the position that the Bible has been corrupted.... If the Bible have been corrupted, then the best advice to the muslims is to stick to the Qur'an and their Islamic sources when debating with Christians just as the Christian AI stuck with the Bible in the debate. If you use the Bible which u believe as been corrupted to back ur arguments then there is a cognitive dissonance on ur part since you people believe that the Bible is corrupt.... This is just an advice to the muslims and the christians

    • @BornAgain223
      @BornAgain223 5 місяців тому +80

      exactly how real muslims argue as well

    • @deborahsmith5285
      @deborahsmith5285 5 місяців тому +18

      One thing that's true that the Islam says about the Holy Bible being changed is it hasn't been completely changed.
      It had been sweaked a little here and there, but those changes made a great difference on how many perceive the Word.
      Our leadership should take a few classes in history from the scrolls to the book to who made the book to did they make their own personal changes and why.
      To say I love God with all my heart, soul, and strength. Don't you want to know the whole truth?

  • @user-zy8ct8yr7n
    @user-zy8ct8yr7n 5 місяців тому +294

    What would be interesting is Muslim AI vs ex-Muslim AI. Debating on how reliable or lack there of on the Koran.

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +102

      hmmm... interesting idea. For that, i'd have to use an open source uncensored model... something to consider. thanks for the note.

    • @danielrodao5473
      @danielrodao5473 5 місяців тому +7

      Totally agree ❤

    • @aalileghari6195
      @aalileghari6195 5 місяців тому +9

      Should do the same with the bible. Has the bible been altered?

    • @anitaaziz3255
      @anitaaziz3255 5 місяців тому +5

      @@JonOleksiuk see.. look at your response to such recommendations. Clearly this is a attempt to attack Islam and not a sincere search of truth. You have answered your own question to me above . Completely biased. Happy with a suggestion to put ex Muslim .. what happened to the balancing of putting also ex Christian , current Jew ex Jew current Hindu ex Hindu etc etc etc This is a waste of time! Now I see your real intention

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +24

      @anitaaziz3255 to clarify... i also think an ex-Christian vs. Christian, ex-Jew vs. Jew, ex-Hindu vs Hindu are interesting ideas that would generate a lot of good conversation.

  • @CDunn322
    @CDunn322 3 місяці тому +52

    As a Christian myself, I found this really dumb. AI just kept arguing the same points back and forth, and yet different point values were given out each time. Not only that, but the debate is pointless in and of itself. Two MAJORLY opposing religions, which are the complete opposites of each other, could never have an honest debate to begin with.

    • @QuinnTheTailor
      @QuinnTheTailor 3 місяці тому +1

      Yeah these AI aren't smart enough. They basically cite scripture back and forth to counter eachothers argument, which even considering how much sense they make.
      Its not clear how an impartial judge gives out points when both sites quite scripture that supports their claims

    • @Ryvaken
      @Ryvaken 3 місяці тому +1

      The points the judge gives out are on a literary rubric, the kind you would use for two people debating equally valid opinions based on equally valid facts. It deducted points any time an AI did not make a strong enough verse citation which is a terrible metric for judging the strength of an argument.
      The actual debates by real people inevitably veer into debating the truth of those underlying, incompatible facts. It's the only way you can possibly reach a conclusion when one book explicitly says "he is not" and the other says "he is." My preferred tactic is to look at those passages that say "he is not" and ask "if this was the all-knowing God speaking to Jesus, why doesn't he know what he's talking about with the third part of the Trinity?" It's a fun early checkmate as you get to watch a Muslim either explain how Allah is wrong, how the book is wrong, how Muhammad was wrong, how Christians are wrong about what Christians believe, sputter something about Saints, try to completely change the topic, or leave.

    • @Hannestv4607
      @Hannestv4607 3 місяці тому +1

      *What your imams don't tell you*
      Son of God does not mean that God has a child in Christianity!
      *this is a mistake in the Qur'an!*

    • @Hannestv4607
      @Hannestv4607 3 місяці тому +1

      *What your imams don't tell you*
      Allah himself testifies that he has a son and he is the son as Christians understand it! Only the Koran writer was too ignorant to know what Son of God means! Allah's word which created everything is Allah himself too! *The Word Allahs which created everything is the Son of God according to Christianity!*

    • @AmbassadorFanClub
      @AmbassadorFanClub 3 місяці тому

      ⁠@@Hannestv4607ah yes the koran writer was ignorant. the only one ignorant is you commenting about a religion without understanding or researching at all about it.

  • @crazyman4985
    @crazyman4985 5 місяців тому +304

    Notice how the Christian A.I. rarely had to quote from the Quran if at all because it used the Bible as the ultimate authority and still won.

    • @knighnp
      @knighnp 4 місяці тому +14

      Well I was thinking that too, but the Christian AI had to defend whether Jesus said he was or no. So she shouldn't try to use the Quaran as a means to defend her stance on Jesus, but rather the whole Bible.

    • @420osis
      @420osis 4 місяці тому

      Jesus--"I and My Father are One". He also said He wasn't saying to the pharisees that He is God--that that would be blasphemy. So. How do these two Scriptures co-exist? He also said "before Abraham, I AM". These all mean He had a progressive revelation to submit and protect for before the Allotted Time. For before He was to be killed. Which. Yes. He died and rose. Another thing Muslims of which try and make mockery. The Quaran says silliness like mole faces when drumpf is the antichrist. And that the sun sets in boiling water. Why don't people debate those? That effect of the Sun that it looks streaky sometimes, is a reflection on oceans or large bodies of NOT BOILING water. Boiling water has nothing to do with it

    • @Kalimatullah_Yoh1-1.14
      @Kalimatullah_Yoh1-1.14 4 місяці тому +7

      And muslim often use bible to counter so quran itself has no sufficient answer and they have to refer back to bible for answers

    • @KD19192
      @KD19192 4 місяці тому +6

      Using Quran as reference would mean losing the debate.

    • @crazyman4985
      @crazyman4985 4 місяці тому

      @@KD19192 lol

  • @DeejayBones876
    @DeejayBones876 5 місяців тому +466

    I was waiting for Christian AI to say "The quran says Mohamed is mentioned in the bible. The bible does not mention Mohamed once how comes?" 😂

    • @juliorosado3709
      @juliorosado3709 5 місяців тому +94

      Even better, the Quran says Jesus is the spirit and the word of Allah

    • @tonyjk
      @tonyjk 5 місяців тому +50

      @@juliorosado3709 exactly, also Q says Jesus as an infant gave life to a clay-bird by 'breathing' into it, just like how God created Adam. They also affirm (khalimatallah) Jesus will be the judge of all the earth

    • @Max_Svensson
      @Max_Svensson 5 місяців тому +114

      Yes, it does.
      "Be wary of false prophets who come in sheep clothing but are actually ferocious wolves"
      Matthew 7:15-20

    • @arabicv1nce531
      @arabicv1nce531 5 місяців тому +24

      @@juliorosado3709 and God is the Word, I forgot the verse but it went something like, In the beginning was the Word, and the word was with God, and the word WAS GOD.

    • @vipcrypto4352
      @vipcrypto4352 5 місяців тому +15

      The Holy Quran is the final book. And the book you call the Bible is not the actual Bible that was given to mankind. And if you watch the DAWAH UA-cam videos you will see proof and citing's of this. Don't believe me, go check the proof yourself.

  • @rodney3297
    @rodney3297 5 місяців тому +231

    The problem with Surah Al-Baqarah 2:79 is that we have manuscripts older than the Quran that line up with todays Bible. Also affirming the argument of the Christian AI.

    • @ibrahimbashir6082
      @ibrahimbashir6082 5 місяців тому +28

      Earliest manuscripts of the bible are in Greek language while Jesus spoke aramaic not Greek. There will definitely be errors and corruptions

    • @betternameneeded6475
      @betternameneeded6475 5 місяців тому +39

      ​@@ibrahimbashir6082 I know it's a leap but I think God knows all languages

    • @Jackkkkkkkk111
      @Jackkkkkkkk111 5 місяців тому

      Why do muslims keep limiting God?

    • @ahmedhamza4510
      @ahmedhamza4510 5 місяців тому +2

      400 years after Esa pbuh

    • @ahmedhamza4510
      @ahmedhamza4510 5 місяців тому +2

      The Ai got given corrupted information

  • @cupra2Jock.
    @cupra2Jock. Місяць тому +9

    Christ is KING. Even Ai knows this. All praise be to God.

    • @taxsolution-bd9dj
      @taxsolution-bd9dj 19 днів тому

      Main Argument: Jesus as a Historical Figure and Religious Leader, Not Divine
      Oh, let’s just take a moment to appreciate the idea that Jesus was merely a remarkable teacher and moral guide, rather than some celestial being. I mean, who needs divine status when you can just preach about love, humility, and monotheism? It’s not like he ever pointed the spotlight on himself, right? Just look at Mark 12:29, where he’s all about directing worship to God, not himself. Clearly, he saw himself as a humble servant of the Almighty, not the Almighty himself.
      Counter-Argument from Christianity: The Doctrine of the Trinity
      But wait! Here comes the Christian counter-argument, waving the Trinity flag high. Apparently, Jesus is part of this divine trio, equal to God the Father and the Holy Spirit. They love to throw around verses like John 1:1, claiming that Jesus was not just hanging out with God but was, in fact, God. And let’s not forget the resurrection-because, obviously, only a god could pull off a magic trick like that and come back from the dead. How convenient!
      1. Key Logical Flaws in the Christian Argument
      Oh, the Trinity! What a delightful puzzle that is. You’ve got one being that’s somehow three persons-because who doesn’t love a good contradiction? It’s like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole while insisting it’s a perfect fit. Monotheism? Sure, but let’s throw in a tri-personal twist just to keep things interesting. Because, obviously, a being can be both one and three at the same time without breaking any logical laws.
      And then there’s Jesus, the supposed all-powerful deity, who can’t even handle a little prayer without calling on a higher power. I mean, what’s up with that? If you’re God, why are you asking for help? Sounds a bit needy, don’t you think? A true god wouldn’t need to pray; that’s just a sign of weakness-definitely not a divine trait.
      Let’s not forget Jesus’ charming little human quirks. He had needs, emotions, and even mortality-how quaint! It’s almost like he was just a regular guy instead of the omnipotent being he’s supposed to be. I mean, who wouldn’t find it perfectly logical that an all-powerful deity would get tired or suffer? That’s just classic divine behavior, right?
      And then we have the Islamic perspective, which is just a breath of fresh air. Jesus is a prophet, not divine-what a novel idea! The Quran gives him a nod for his miraculous birth and teachings but draws the line at calling him God. Surah Al-Ma'idah 5:72 makes it crystal clear: saying Allah is Christ is just blasphemy. Islam keeps it simple with a strict monotheistic view, because why complicate things with divine partners? That would just ruin the whole concept of unity and transcendence.
      So, here’s the grand finale: the whole Trinity thing and Jesus being human really throw a wrench in the idea that he’s divine. Sure, he’s a big deal in the religious world, but let’s be real-his vibe is more like that of a wise teacher or a prophet, not some celestial being. And guess what? Islam totally backs this up by giving him a shout-out while still hammering home that God is one and can’t be split into pieces. How original!

  • @charlessmith7277
    @charlessmith7277 5 місяців тому +149

    I don’t think Jesus felt abandoned on the cross. He was merely quoting Psalm 22 to minister to his followers and remind us that he is the fulfillment of that prophecy and to encourage us to take heart as indicated at the end of that chapter.

    • @Blkswan911
      @Blkswan911 4 місяці тому +16

      Man, I was so sad it didnt even read psalms 22!!! Jesus quoted it VERBADUM!

    • @waldo2635
      @waldo2635 4 місяці тому +5

      Jesus cried out to his Father, Oh God, have You forsaken me? You don't think Jesus felt abandoned???

    • @joelferguson4089
      @joelferguson4089 4 місяці тому +14

      @@waldo2635did you read psalm 22?

    • @jeremiahcase4699
      @jeremiahcase4699 4 місяці тому +4

      ​@@joelferguson4089But he was in human form. You dont think he felt everything as we do? He was tempted and felt all the emotions that we have.

    • @Blkswan911
      @Blkswan911 4 місяці тому

      @@waldo2635 read psalms 22 dude. he was quoting a prophesy

  • @Smashfrank-ms4sx
    @Smashfrank-ms4sx 5 місяців тому +770

    Muslim AI is debating like Muslims debaters, repeating itself over and over without making any point. Note: jesus christ is lord and God 💯%. Without him the second death "HELL" you will not escape it.

    • @sayedomairsiam6344
      @sayedomairsiam6344 5 місяців тому +78

      And christian AI is giving the same answer that doesnt make sense 😂

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +109

      it did get a bit repetitive towards the end. Again, I did this without human intervention, perhaps in the future, a moderator could keep the conversation from looping back to certain scriptures. Maybe repeating a scripture is penalized, i don't know... thanks for the note.

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +34

      @@sayedomairsiam6344 which answer were you referring to?

    • @noahwamalwa4385
      @noahwamalwa4385 5 місяців тому +9

      @@JonOleksiuk NOPE, judgement should based on satisfactory answer not repetition

    • @jordans6353
      @jordans6353 5 місяців тому +8

      To you it doesn’t make sense because the concept inferential reasoning is not natural or possible for people that are indoctrinated into taking everything word for word.

  • @BornAgain223
    @BornAgain223 5 місяців тому +44

    Jesus also calls himself the good shepherd, so he actually claims to be good, therefore asking why someone calls him good does not deny his deity.

    • @zortez6468
      @zortez6468 5 місяців тому +2

      very well said

    • @gamer__dud10
      @gamer__dud10 5 місяців тому +2

      He is saying that he is God Figuratively

    • @schoolaccount-g6z
      @schoolaccount-g6z 5 місяців тому +4

      @@gamer__dud10 "And the Word was with God, and the Word was God... and the Word became Flesh, and made His dwelling among us." - John 1

    • @jackwhite3947
      @jackwhite3947 4 місяці тому +1

      He also calls himself God . That would make him Deity .

    • @jackwhite3947
      @jackwhite3947 4 місяці тому

      ​@@gamer__dud10so why did the religious leaders take stones to stone him , on more than one occasion , for blasphemy. That wasn't figuratively. He was lying or he was God .

  • @khairulkafee9500
    @khairulkafee9500 Місяць тому +15

    This judge was very biased. The Muslim literally answered every question justly yet the Christian couldn’t address why God would need to limit himself to understand human or the fact that killing a human to atone for all of humanity’s sins is unjust.

    • @sorayailona
      @sorayailona Місяць тому +8

      It’s not unjust, it’s actually justice. We must be punished for our sins because God is just and cannot ignore what we’ve done. But God in His love provided a way for sinners to be saved from the punishment. The only way He can save sinners like you and me is if someone takes our hell-punishment for us. The only one able to do that is God Himself by becoming a man because the sacrifice had to be sinless and perfect. Animal sacrifices were merely a picture of the ultimate sacrifice that would pay for our sins once for all.
      Leviticus‬ ‭17:11‬
      “For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul.’
      Hebrews 9:22
      “And according to the law almost all things are purified with blood, and without shedding of blood there is no remission.”
      Jesus Christ lived perfectly in our place and died, shedding His blood as the propitiation for our sins. He was buried but then He rose from the dead on the third day and ascended to Heaven.

    • @phun1901
      @phun1901 22 дні тому +1

      Both sides made bad arguments. And your question has a faulty premise. God doesn't need to punish anything, doesn't need to forgive anything in any particular way. The question is not what did he need to do, it's what did he choose to do.

  • @hank2130
    @hank2130 5 місяців тому +254

    Sam Shamoun would crush the Muslim Ai, he’d pose better answers and arguments than the Christian Ai.

    • @hriata5384
      @hriata5384 5 місяців тому

      Cause I think the Christian ai is program only to use the bible and not question the Qur'an back....only defence mode and no ofence..
      Sad😢

    • @smokeb
      @smokeb 5 місяців тому +8

      True

    • @hepx7584
      @hepx7584 5 місяців тому +10

      He is the men of God pray for him do hi can understand more

    • @ShatarAhpayach
      @ShatarAhpayach 5 місяців тому

      Sam is a drug addict, and a base man.

    • @onlyenzoYT
      @onlyenzoYT 5 місяців тому +7

      Accept Jesus Christ 🙏🏽❤️

  • @brooksjack45
    @brooksjack45 5 місяців тому +54

    This is good, but they seemed to repeat some argument structures too much.
    They lack ability to make deeper prophetic connections between old and new testaments.

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +16

      good thought, maybe a round on prophecy would have been beneficial, thanks for the note.

    • @christmpika8601
      @christmpika8601 5 місяців тому +2

      Good point. That goes along with islamic teachings (Quran) claiming to be abrahamic (use of the Old Testament prophets and Jesus) but finding sacrificial blood rituals for atonement not from God, something widely spreads in the Scriptures it affirms. Islam and this muslim AI have problems - inconsiderate and flaws. An AI is just an ai anyway and Islam is just it.

    • @kenim
      @kenim 5 місяців тому +4

      Also it lacks some specific nuance. Like theologically the moment you admit Jesus was with God in the begining, it already establishes Him as God, not as servant.

  • @usafriptide1719
    @usafriptide1719 5 місяців тому +148

    This was absolutely amazing. The purest definition of Steel-manning. I'm not sure a Muslim could find fault in this nor a Christian for that matter, at least scripturally. I do wish there was more historical context personally like how the Quran was written 600 years after Jesus and the Gospels were written by his eyewitnesses that were with him in life or how the Quran denies his crucifixion when the eyewitnesses proclaim it's validity. Possibly a follow-up vid?

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +27

      Great idea, thanks for the suggestion. Currently working on a theist-atheist debate.

    • @peterdavis9403
      @peterdavis9403 4 місяці тому +7

      As a Christian I found fault on both sides. The problem with the "AI Christian" side of the debate is the use of the Trinity doctrine which was added by false Christians (foretold by Jesus and the Apostles) after the first century. In particular the quoting of John 10:1 "The Father and I are one," while ignoring John 17:21 where Jesus prays the the disciples would be one "just as he and the Father are one." That would mean all the disciples would become God using their reasoning. That is the proposition Satan gave Eve in the garden of Eden, "You will be like God.." The "AI Muslim" side got more of that right but have other wrong reasonings.

    • @MrOghoghosa
      @MrOghoghosa 4 місяці тому

      @@peterdavis9403the Bible reaches that God calls us to become like him! We were made in his image and likeness so we are becoming Gods but not like Jesus who is the Word made flesh ! The perfect distinction is made clear all through the Bible that Jesus is God in being the very essence and bodily embodies God as the text clearly states then the word stateseth first begotten from the dead ! God himself became flesh so that can become gods again !
      It’s the prayer he prayed he never claimed they were with God in glory like he claimed in that prayer that he was with God in Glory before the foundation of the world! You could not join it together
      The three are one but all magnifies the other
      Psalms says he has magnified his word above his name!
      The Word magnifies his name also
      And the Holy spirit magnifies both the word and his person !

    • @nic4633
      @nic4633 4 місяці тому +11

      ​@peterdavis9403 Christians that believe in the trinity do not believe they're God. Weird Satan reference. Sounds pretty hateful to outright call them fake Christians lol.

    • @jameshathaway5117
      @jameshathaway5117 4 місяці тому +13

      ​@@peterdavis9403trinity doctrine starts in the old testament and is found throughout the Bible. Jews used to refer to it along the lines of a mysterious compound unity or mysterious compound nature. Jews did not fight this idea until after the life of Jesus. At one time nearly any well read jew would have told you that there is a multiplicity to God yet He is still one. After the life of Jesus this was all displaced in an attempt to distance themselves from Christianity. Modern Judaism is a response to Christianity not a continuance of the original faith. Thats why yhe Kabblah was more or less shelved in Jewish faith post Jesus. Even in Genesis you can find God saying He will be somewhere yet He is both in heaven and that location simultaneously. The complex nature of God just didn't have a name until the term "trinity" was coined but it was always present. In the old testament the three are referred to as God the father (or presence of God), the spirit of God, and the angel of God. These three are often used in the same verses as being and doing different things simultaneously while still being God. Even the very language use in Hebrew points to the plurality and oneness of God. Elohim is a plural term that is used for God yet the verbs attached are always singular. If you don't believe Jesus is God then His sacrifice is incapable of covering the sin of humanity.

  • @Aardvarker-wp5ie
    @Aardvarker-wp5ie Місяць тому +1

    Man, a totally unbiased, logical and emotion-less debate. What a breath of fresh air

  • @cylonsteve2511
    @cylonsteve2511 5 місяців тому +282

    I felt sorry for the Muslim AI, it couldn't resort to violence to defeat the opponent and struggled with the Christian AI quotes. For example, it kept saying "when you look at the text this way or that way..." [Paraphrased] instead of giving anything concrete.

    • @NakyeseZaitun
      @NakyeseZaitun 5 місяців тому +39

      And I find Christian AI explanations logically making sense

    • @TheBenpg
      @TheBenpg 5 місяців тому +21

      exactly , they know about jesus devinity, but they CHOOSE to interpret it differently lmaao

    • @Fookruzzia-fookpalestine
      @Fookruzzia-fookpalestine 5 місяців тому +1

      God becomes man,sinless.
      To be a fair judge,live as a man, die as a man.feel our joys and pains.
      Better equipped to judge fairly, having lived as a man.
      Would I listen to someone who learned about depression from a book? Or listen to someone who lived through depression and came out the other side. Experience of the situation makes one better equipped to judge or help.

    • @tjubrain6755
      @tjubrain6755 5 місяців тому

      Maybe you miss understood

    • @tjubrain6755
      @tjubrain6755 5 місяців тому

      Jesus is spiritual being in human form but he doesn't claim to be the creator of the universe

  • @cylonsteve2511
    @cylonsteve2511 5 місяців тому +202

    I think Christian AI held back. There are verses that eliminate any counter argument verse of the Quran and there Quran verses that confirm the Bible Scriptures as true. In other words, the Quran defeats itself.

    • @cylonsteve2511
      @cylonsteve2511 5 місяців тому +16

      Galatians 1: 6-9, and Surah Al-Ma'idah - 48, for example. It sort of makes the debate mute from an Islamic perspective.

    • @BlackMamba-wi2qk
      @BlackMamba-wi2qk 5 місяців тому +8

      ⁠@@cylonsteve2511it doesn’t tho, if you read chapter 5 verse 44, you will see that the rabbis was given a job to preserve the other manuscripts, But in al baqarah verse 179, it comfirms they failed the test and changed the verses with their hand.

    • @cylonsteve2511
      @cylonsteve2511 5 місяців тому

      @@BlackMamba-wi2qk Consider these: [Quran 2:136] Say, "We believe in God; and in what was revealed to us; and in what was revealed to Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the Patriarchs; and in what was given to Moses and Jesus; and in what was given to the prophets-from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we surrender.
      [Quran 3:3] He sent down to you the Book with the Truth, confirming what came before it; and He sent down the Torah and the Gospel.
      [Quran 3:184] If they accuse you of lying, messengers before you were accused of lying. They came with the proofs, and the Psalms, and the Illuminating Scripture.
      [Quran 6:154] Then We gave Moses the Scripture, perfect for the righteous, and explaining everything clearly, and a beacon, and mercy, that they may believe in the encounter with their Lord.
      [Quran 5:46] In their footsteps, We sent Jesus son of Mary, fulfilling the Torah that preceded him; and We gave him the Gospel, wherein is guidance and light, and confirming the Torah that preceded him, and guidance and counsel for the righteous. [Quran 5:47] So let the people of the Gospel rule according to what God revealed in it. Those who do not rule according to what God revealed are the sinners.
      [Quran 10:94] If you are in doubt about what We revealed to you, ask those who read the Scripture before you. The truth has come to you from your Lord, so do not be of those who doubt.
      [Quran 4:136] O you who believe! Believe in God and His messenger, and the Book He sent down to His messenger, and the Book He sent down before. Whoever rejects God, His angels, His Books, His messengers, and the Last Day, has strayed far in error.
      [Quran 16:43] We did not send before you except men whom We inspired. So ask the people of knowledge, if you do not know.
      [Quran 21:7] We did not send before you except men, whom We inspired. Ask the people of knowledge, if you do not know.
      [Quran 40:78] We sent messengers before you. Some of them We told you about, and some We did not tell you about. No messenger can bring a miracle except by leave of God. Then, when the command of God is issued, fair judgment will be passed, and there and then the seekers of vanity will lose.
      [Quran 41:43] Nothing is said to you but was said to the Messengers before you: your Lord is Possessor of Forgiveness, and Possessor of Painful Repayment. [Quran 41:44] Had We made it a Quran in a foreign language, they would have said, "If only its verses were made clear." Non-Arabic and an Arab? Say, "For those who believe, it is guidance and healing. But as for those who do not believe: there is heaviness in their ears, and it is blindness for them. These are being called from a distant place.
      [Quran 46:12] And before it was the Book of Moses, a model and a mercy. And this is a confirming Book, in the Arabic language, to warn those who do wrong-and good news for the doers of good.
      [Quran 5:43] But why do they come to you for judgment, when they have the Torah, in which is God's Law? Yet they turn away after that. These are not believers.
      All the above verses in the Quran would not have been revealed if scriptures before were not true.
      About the Law, Jesus said:
      Matthew 5:17 (NIV)
      “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them."
      I know it is hard to believe God has so much love (Greek: Agape) he would actually become Holy title of The Son of Man. But it is true.

    • @Carnistoilet
      @Carnistoilet 5 місяців тому

      nope.

    • @epairoyahushua4314
      @epairoyahushua4314 5 місяців тому +2

      100%

  • @josephfox9221
    @josephfox9221 5 місяців тому +35

    its amazing how far AI has come. not once did it have to say "as a large language model" like Chat GPT does

    • @ydambi4334
      @ydambi4334 5 місяців тому

      If you address it’s very self it would highly indeed, or ask it to do something it cannot. AI is still a product so it has liability it has to account for, which is why companies will always program it to say it is just a x and y model and can only do this for you.
      Cmon bro lol
      Also “how far AI has come” bro this was not a show of progress they are programmed to say that, it’s not a matter of technology or improved progress 😭

  • @HistoryViper
    @HistoryViper Місяць тому

    This is the greatest idea for a video with using AI! Great job! Great way to implement it as well! F***ing genius! Now that I've watched the whole thing, there were a few things the AI got wrong. Overall they did a pretty good job on the debate

    • @denimmybos9740
      @denimmybos9740 Місяць тому +1

      He used offline AI model whose data we can add and change according to our own perspective. which is definitely not objective. You can also make it in the LM studio application.

  • @Juraikken
    @Juraikken 5 місяців тому +56

    The ending had me on the floor. If you can do this again, but include extra-biblical support from contemporaries or even study of etymology and the Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic languages as part of the debate. It would be more interesting.
    I say this because during the part about the I AM arc, the fact that "Before Abraham was" was completely glossed over by the Muslim counterpart as irrelevant, when it should have been addressed that Jesus being ALIVE with God during creation puts him outside of merely being in an "honored" status. They fail to reconcile how Jesus' pre-existence doesn't immediately prove his divinity, since all things were created by Christ. How can a non-deity exist prior to all things being created? Nothing in either holy texts claim an eternal being, having no beginning and no end, is anything other than God.
    Prophets never accepted worship though, "highly revered" is not the same as "accepted worship" not a single prophet in the history of ever accepted worship and the scriptures approved of it.

    • @bikesrcool_1958
      @bikesrcool_1958 4 місяці тому +1

      Now imagine giving early church father resources and extra biblical writings from the churches. Yeah, I have a feeling Christianity would win that as all the thinking that’s been put in for the past 2 millennia

    • @TheMMSpirit
      @TheMMSpirit 4 місяці тому +2

      Who visited Abraham and wrestled with Jacob? Who spoke to Moses? Sure, it was angels that visited Lot, that's certain, but the Lord himself who appeared before the others. Yet, Jesus claims noone has ever seen the Father. Thus, Jesus has appeared in human form even in the old testament, acting and speaking for his father.

    • @THEEArmoredSaint
      @THEEArmoredSaint 4 місяці тому

      Agreed! Came here to say this

    • @mdemel06
      @mdemel06 2 місяці тому

      Don’t forget that Ethiopian Christian sect. The ones who are supposedly the ones hiding and holding the Arch of the covenant.

  • @entertaininformmedia7836
    @entertaininformmedia7836 5 місяців тому +67

    AI-10 Muslims admitting Jesus said "... because I said, I am God's Son." (15:36) was a career-ending admission, yet netted them 41 points.

    • @DanyelBasko
      @DanyelBasko 5 місяців тому +12

      It's okay, we won in this debate. Considering that emotional Factors are not included, we won both faith and Logical reasoning.

    • @celestialknight2339
      @celestialknight2339 4 місяці тому

      @@entertaininformmedia7836 You’re missing the point. Jesus wasn’t calling himself God (which is the debate topic), but only a special servant of God. This is why he quoted Psalm 82:6, which also says that mortals are the ‘sons of God’ and even ‘GODS’ (elohim). Do you see the point now?
      Your flawed assumption is thinking that “son of God” means the same thing you believe it does today-when in fact, ancient Jewish vernacular was comfortable calling all sorts of people the “son of God” as a figurative title, such as Jacob (Exodus 4:22), King David (Psalm 2:7), and even Adam in the New Testament (Luke 3:38) of the “peacemakers” by the lips of Jesus in Matthew 5:9. This doesn’t mean God is 32-in-1. It’s just a metaphorical way to say “righteous servant of God” which Christians have stretched, exaggerated, and tacked onto Jesus while forgetting its original meaning.
      So the only career-ending admission is on you, I’m afraid :)
      Peace.

    • @celestialknight2339
      @celestialknight2339 4 місяці тому +6

      @@DanyelBasko Christianity has lost the real argument, because objective historical study & analysis has now conclusively revealed that the ancient Jewish rabbi named Jesus who taught on the streets of Galilee, NEVER claimed to be a divine incarnation of God as part of a Trinity, but only believed himself to be the Messiah, and God’s prophet & messenger (see Mark 8:29, Matthew 21:11, Luke 24:19, Mark 6:4, etc.).
      The debate is literally over. It’s not a matter of faith anymore. We can analyze the sources and see what the historical Jesus REALLY taught (not what people falsely put into his mouth or taught about him decades and centuries later), and the conclusion agrees 100% with Islam. Not with Pauline Christianity.
      I hope you read the Qur’an for yourself (God’s final revelation) and please repent before it’s too late. Worship God alone-who is both Christ’s Lord and your Lord.
      Peace.

    • @UseReasonForgetDogma
      @UseReasonForgetDogma 3 місяці тому +4

      @@celestialknight2339 John 8:58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.”
      Jesus claims to precede in existence his own physical form. Not only that, but he transcends time. Why? Because he didn´t say I WAS, He said I AM. Only God can exist at different moments at the same time, because God is omnipresent as well as omnipotent. The Quran itself says Jesus was God´s spirit and word. SPIRIT OF GOD, inside a human body = JESUS, King of Kings, Son of God, the Son of man and redeemer of our souls.
      May He have mercy on us, and on all muslims who take the word of a man over Him, who gave His own life to give you everything.

    • @celestialknight2339
      @celestialknight2339 3 місяці тому

      @@UseReasonForgetDogma The Gospel of John is historically unreliable, coming last of the four Gospels written around ~70-100 A.D., with significant theological & legendary embellishment over time. We can see this evolution over the four gospels as the titles, actions, and statements of Jesus (like the ‘I Am’ you just shared) change & become bigger as you from the earliest account (Mark) to the latest one (John), almost like a snowball getting bigger as time goes on.
      Historians & Bible scholars have already confirmed this, and they can trace back the real historical Jesus to what the earliest layers of evidence reveal-and that is namely that he was only an apocalyptic prophet-messenger of God, who did not see himself as divine. John 8:58 is no doubt a later legendary fabrication put into his lips, which is shockingly why we can find this statement in NONE of the earlier 3 Synoptic gospels-Mark, Matthew, or Luke.
      The Qur’an takes us back to the original truth, which perfectly supports the historical evidence and makes sense with REASON-as your name suggests-that Jesus upheld the Hebrew Biblical prophets and their consistent message of monotheism and repentance, and did not suddenly change it into a Trinity and atonement via the cross (as you now falsely believe). This theology came from Paul, who never met Jesus and even insulted his disciples, yet authored nearly HALF of your New Testament.
      Please repent, and use reason 🙏🏼 Peace.

  • @nerdkidd05
    @nerdkidd05 5 місяців тому +109

    It's funny how the debate immediately started citing more Christian Scriptures and quoting the Quran much less. It's almost inevitable for Muslims, they must refute the Scriptures that came before the Quran in order to accuse the Scriptures of being corrupt and claim that the Quran is the Word of God. Let's be fair, that's something impossible to be done when you compete with the actual Word of God.

    • @Yassine3333222222
      @Yassine3333222222 5 місяців тому +7

      Because there's no contradiction in Quran. The Christian AI cannot use it as arguments. However, in the bible there's many contradictions that can be used as arguments

    • @nerdkidd05
      @nerdkidd05 5 місяців тому +15

      ​@@Yassine3333222222 Funny how all the supposed contradictions have been easily answered by the Christian AI, but the Muslim one would make the same questions about the same verses over and over

    • @Yassine3333222222
      @Yassine3333222222 5 місяців тому +6

      The Muslim AI is very weak, I myself am better than him. First of all, there's a very important question, Jesus never called himself God or ordered us to call him God. Do we have the right to do so!!? From where we got that right!!? From no one, it's an invention. It adds to the scripture.
      Second, let's summarise everything: Jesus in the bible --> • Prays to God. • Is sent by God. • Obeys God. • The Father is his god. • Heard the truth from God. • Learned from God. • Cries to God. • Said that the father is the only true God. • Doing only the will of the father. • Has been given the authority and power by God. • Glorified by God. • Raised by God.
      Conclusion: Jesus doesn't have any difference with him or a prophet of God. They have the same purpose, same human nature, and he died in the cross as human nature because God can not die.
      All Christianity can be debunked only by the bible itself.

    • @nerdkidd05
      @nerdkidd05 5 місяців тому +2

      @@Yassine3333222222 i wrote a whole essay and sent it here, but apparently it was deleted, so i am sad

    • @be_still_and_know_946
      @be_still_and_know_946 5 місяців тому

      @@Yassine3333222222 Exodus 3:13-15 Then Moses said to God, “Indeed, when I come to the children of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they say to me, ‘What is His name?’ What shall I say to them?” And God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.” And He (God) said, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, 'I AM has sent me to you.
      Jesus said to them (the Jews), “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.” John 10:32 Jesus answered them, “Many good works I have shown you from My Father. For which of those works do you stone Me?”
      33 The Jews answered Him, saying, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.”
      Jesus did claim to be God.

  • @wmadoro
    @wmadoro 3 дні тому +1

    The Muslim AI, doesn't argue like Muslims typically argue. It didn't once redirect, deflect, or run away from any of the questions. Even though the Christian AI won the debate, Muslims can take note of how a debate is supposed to go and that Jesus is GOD. Be blessed 🙌🏽

  • @k1kenzi
    @k1kenzi 4 місяці тому +104

    U know it’s the end, when two computer have this conversation.

    • @medhoover
      @medhoover 4 місяці тому +3

      SOON:
      RabbAI
      Imam khumAIni
      😭

    • @USAP1776
      @USAP1776 4 місяці тому

      I honestly enjoyed this and hope they cover many topics. Baptist vs charismatic world be a good one lol

    • @willijbaybeh
      @willijbaybeh 4 місяці тому

      😂😂😂😂 i find this comment to be hilarious. One AI might hack the other😂

    • @JESUS_IN_TALMUD_SON_OF_PANTERA
      @JESUS_IN_TALMUD_SON_OF_PANTERA 4 місяці тому

      Jesus called the magician . son of pantera in Judaism 🤣

    • @nayon9379
      @nayon9379 4 місяці тому

      👚THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the last age in which God is saving man from the imminent destruction of this old world"
      (These things must be spoken directly and clarified for the sake of human understanding, or man will not be freed from Satan's influence. The ways that Satan corrupts people only on a superficial level; Even worse are the deceptions that hide under this outward form that Satan uses to achieve his goal. What is this scam? Forced occupation--this gives a very strong effect. (And makes a tempting offer, and this is lying.) Is lying not the same as fraud? The purpose of lying is actually to deceive you! Are there any other scams? (It tempts, harms, blinds and deceives) (it controls man, holds man, frightens man greatly and prevents man from believing in God.) What does this mean by "coercion"? This means using threats and coercive tactics to force you to comply with it making you think about what might happen if you don't comply. What does "fraud and trickery" entail? Satan makes up several stories and lies, tricking you into believing them. It will do everything to achieve its goals. Sometimes it does you a little favor, while it entices you to sin. If you don't obey it, it will torment you and punish you, and it will use various methods to attack you and trap you. The sixth is destruction of body and mind. Which part of man does Satan destroy? (Man's mind and whole being) Satan destroys your mind, deprives you of the ability to resist, which means your heart slowly turns to Satan when you least expect it. This is where Satan dwells, seizing and devouring them. 🙏)
      Almighty God said
      WHAT THINGS must be spoken DIRECTLY and clarified for the SAKE of MAN'S UNDERSTANDING, or MAN will NEVER be freed from SATAN'S influence. The WAYS SATAN CORRUPTS PEOPLE are just the SUPERFINE layer; Even WORSE are the deceptions hiding UNDER this OUTER form that SATAN USES to ACHIEVE his PURPOSE. ☀️
      WHAT IS THIS SCAM? Mix them together: (It deceives, seduces and intimidates) (It also uses sweet language. When--it influences and forcibly conquers the People.) Forced conquest----this gives a very strong effect . (And makes a tempting offer, and it lies.)
      Lying is one of the things it does.
      SATAN LIES to DECEPT you. WHAT is NATURAL LYING? Is LYING NOT the SAME as FRAUD? 😥
      The purpose of lying is actually to deceive you! Are there any other scams? (It tempts, harms, blinds and deceives)
      (it controls the person, holds the person, scares the person very much and prevents the person from believing in
      God.)🌹🙏🌷
      There are SIX MAIN DECEPTIONS that SATAN USES to CORRUPT PEOPLE.
      The FIRST is control and coercion. That is, Satan will do everything he can to control your heart. ☀️
      WHAT DOES "force" MEAN?
      This MEANS USING THREATENING and FORCING TACTICS to FORCE you to COMPLY with it you THINK about what could HAPPEN if you DON'T OBEY. You are afraid and do not dare to oppose it, so you submit to it. 🌹🙏🌷
      The SECOND is fraud and trickery.
      WHAT does "fraud and trickery" have to do with it?
      SATAN MAKES UP SOME STORIES and LIES, TRICKING you into BELIEVING them.
      The THIRD is forced indoctrination.
      What is forced to teach the People?
      Is forced indoctrination done by the will of the People? (No) Even if you don't agree, there's nothing you can do. SATAN DOCTRINES you WITHOUT you KNOWING it, IMPRESSING his THINKING, his LIFE POLICIES and his SPIRIT on you.
      The FOURTH is threats and enticements. That is, Satan uses various tricks to get you to accept it, follow it, work in its service. It WILL DO EVERYTHING to ACHIEVE its GOALS. Sometimes it gives you SMALL favors, WHILE it LEADS you to SIN. If you DO NOT FOLLOW it, it WILL TORTURE you and PUNISH you, and it WILL USE various METHODS to ATTACK you and TRAP you. 🙏🌹🙏
      The fifth is deception and paralysis. "Deception and paralysis" is Satan's construction of certain sounding words and ideas to suit the minds of the People, to make it seem as if it takes into account the physical condition of their lives and tomorrow, when the truth is it isits only purpose is to deceive you.
      Then it paralyzes you so that you do not know what is right and what is wrong, so you are deceived without knowing it and come under its control.
      The sixth is the destruction of body and mind.
      Which part of man does Satan destroy? (Man's mind and whole being) SATAN DESTROYES your MIND, REMOVES you of the ABILITY to RESIST, which MEANS your HEART will slowly TURN against SATAN when you least expect it. 😢
      It instills these things in you every day, every day using these ideas and cultures to influence and deceive you, slowly destroying you, so that you no longer want to stand up for what you call righteousness.
      You don't realize it, you don't have it anymore
      KEEPING SWIMMING AGAINST the CURRENT, INSTEAD of just WAITING for it.
      "Destruction" MEANS that SATAN TORTURES people so MUCH that they BECOME SHADOWS of THEMSELVES, NO LONGER PEOPLE. This is where SATAN LIVES, CHOKING and SWALLOWING THEM. 🙏
      Each of these tricks that Satan uses to CORRUPT MAN can take away man's power to fight; any of these are DEADLY to PEOPLE. Simply put, whatever Satan does and whatever trickery he uses can weaken you under SATAN'S CONTROL and SUBMERGE you in a MASSAGE of EVIL and SIN.
      These are the DECEPTIONS that SATAN USES to CORRUPT PEOPLE.
      What are the consequences of Satan's corruption of the People? What corrupt dispositions do they express and reveal? (PRUDENCE and PRIDE, SELFISHNESS and DISGUSTINGNESS, BADNESS and DECEPTION, CRUELTY and MALICUS, and COMPLETE INHUMANITY.) 😪
      In sum, we can say that they have no personality.
      In summary, the things that stand out the most about corrupt humanity are ARROGANCE, DECEPTION, MALICIOUSNESS, and SELF-CONFIDENCE. 😪
      However, you all missed one thing.
      PEOPLE have NO CONSCIENCE, LOST their RIGHTEOUSNESS and have NO HUMANITY----YET there is ONE who does VERY IMPORTANT THING you DIDN'T MENTION, that is, "betrayal" 😢😢
      The FINAL CONSEQUENCE of these DISPOSITIONS that EXIST in ANY person the MOMENT they are CORRUPTED by SATAN is their BETRAYAL to GOD. 🙏
      From "The Word Appears in the Flesh"
      Fulfillment of (John 1:1) and (Ezekiel 2:9-10), (Rev. 19:9,13)
      📥Calling and leading everyone to His lowered Kingdom or Church because it is still standing on earth in the holy place in the air/ youtube "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD 💐 this is the fulfillment of what He said to Peter 2,000 years ago, recorded in (Matthew 16:18'19).
      This is the the only Church of each one of our spirit that we must listen to or eat and drink like how we eat, dress and sleep every day so that He can guide us and change us by rejecting the evil attached by satan so as to be perfect,
      having attained eternal life that will enter the coming replacement of the New Heaven and New Earth. 📩
      Note📩
      Almighty God said,
      Life in the Kingdom is the life of people and God Himself. Humanity depends on My care and precaution, and all are engaged in fighting the great red dragon to the death. In order to win this last battle, and to end the great red dragon, all people must offer Me their entire being, for My Kingdom. When I say "KINGDOM", I mean it is the life lived under the protection of divinity, where all humanity I constantly guide, I teach directly, so that the life of all humanity, although in world is as if it were in heaven, the true spirit of life in the third heaven . 🙏

  • @nkengnkafu7243
    @nkengnkafu7243 4 місяці тому +120

    I’ve heard Muslims give far better arguments against the divinity of Jesus than this AI, and I’ve also heard Christians give far better arguments to prove Jesus’ divinity than this AI. My point? Machines will never be better than the human mind. What we should be doing is trying to harness the full potential of the human mind, rather than taking the easy way out by turning to machines

    • @intertonality9846
      @intertonality9846 4 місяці тому +14

      Christianity is objectively more true, sounds like high-grade Islamic copium to me

    • @adam.gamer.109
      @adam.gamer.109 4 місяці тому +1

      At least muslim side have points.

    • @rc6289
      @rc6289 4 місяці тому +9

      At least Christian's base who our Messiah is from the Old Testament. And we Test the Old Testament Scriptures to the New Testament Scriptures. If the Messiah does not fulfill these ancient Messianic Prophecies then he is a False and Failing Messiah. And during Jesus First coming he Fulfilled 360 Messianic Prophecies. A Mere Man can not fulfill 8 of these Messianic Prophecy. It is very hard to be the Messiah and there is only One yet many false Messiah's are being taught.
      What is rather sad, is Muhammad never read the Holy Scriptures but people believe His interpretation of the Holy Scriptures! And he denied the Divinity and the Eternal Sonship of the Messiah without even reading and studying the Holy Scriptures. He had little knowledge of the Holy Scriptures. He didn't even know when his different angel Gabriel told him false Revelation amd contradicted the True Angel Gabriel 600 years later. If he known the Scriptures he would of Rebuked the Angel.
      In Galatians 1:6-10 it says:
      Galatians 1:6-10 ESV
      [6] I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel- [7] not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. [8] _But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed._ [9] _As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed._ [10] For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ.
      To distort the Gospel you have to teach completely the oppisite. And let the man Muhammad amd his different angel Jibreel be accursed!

    • @EclipsixGaming
      @EclipsixGaming 4 місяці тому +2

      Yes, it's beneficial for you, but the AI has considered these arguments numerous times. It can process and calculate various points without needing to explicitly state them. This is the power of machines while you might think of one counter-argument, the AI has thousands and can reach much deeper conclusions than a human. If you truly want to discuss AI, you need to understand how it operates. The AI knows it's communicating with another AI. otherwise, it wouldn't speak so recklessly. Next time you should know the depths of an AI and you should try why the ai came to that conclusion than you have your answer.

    • @tariqspaulding8034
      @tariqspaulding8034 4 місяці тому

      Unitarian Christian did not believe in a Trinity. Jesus Save = Roman/Greek God = Worship of the White man = promotes racism. (Romans 3:7)

  • @cyberkidstudios
    @cyberkidstudios 4 місяці тому +214

    You know what’s funny it’s that fact in round 2 the ai can’t rely on the Muslim book to win but have to go to the bible to try make a contradiction

    • @timlovett2673
      @timlovett2673 4 місяці тому +26

      Quite a few similarities between Islam and Mormonism...

    • @cyberkidstudios
      @cyberkidstudios 4 місяці тому +6

      @@timlovett2673 facts

    • @rangers94ism
      @rangers94ism 4 місяці тому

      It's also what Protestants do when they argue against Catholics. Protestants just bring their own interpretation, which tends to be weak, tinfoil hat wearing theology.

    • @muhammadrahman2601
      @muhammadrahman2601 4 місяці тому +21

      Well a book from god cant have contradictions.

    • @TrenchCoatDingo
      @TrenchCoatDingo 4 місяці тому

      @@muhammadrahman2601 then all religious texts are kinda screwed

  • @digidox7900
    @digidox7900 3 місяці тому +2

    The statement, "The Father is greater than I," also refers to the fact that the Son's existence is predicated in the Father, and not the other way around. Since God is the cause of the Son, He is also looked up to by the Son.

  • @Yipper64
    @Yipper64 4 місяці тому +163

    One thing I notice with this debate is if a real Christian and Muslim where to debate like this, when the Christian quotes scripture the Muslim would say "but the scripture is invalid because it was mistranslated" or you know, whatever it is they specifically say. Essentially a Muslim wouldnt let it be used as an argument.
    Not to mention how two people will often try to drive the conversation towards a point they can make their strongest point while glossing over the weaker points. Whereas LLMs are specifically made to never steer the conversation in a different direction.

    • @doxlartnk2689
      @doxlartnk2689 4 місяці тому +3

      both bible and quran have problems get translated due to the evolution of language they have dofferent rules and different meetings

    • @zoubeirfaouzi149
      @zoubeirfaouzi149 4 місяці тому +6

      When Muslims entertain what is in the Bible. Just understand that we do that to not shut down the conversation. Because Muslims hold a high stand for authentication of scripture before even entertaining what is in it. Because the verses in the Quran are preserved with a chain of narration for example. One with high standards. The Bible does not even come near the hadith. Which has also a chain of narration and is classified from authentic to weak. Every vers in the Bible would be considered as weak by a Muslim, because there is simply no proof that it came from the source.
      The only way for us as Muslims to find some shreds of truth within the Bible. Is to compare it with the Quran which we do consider as authentic.
      There can we find something similar like the first command that our God is one.

    • @abssnipes
      @abssnipes 4 місяці тому +1

      conclusion respect other beliefs

    • @mariol6402
      @mariol6402 4 місяці тому

      Muslims also deny subsequent alterations to the Qur’an. Their scholars say: that should not be discussed when there are contradictions.
      This debate of the AIs in so far as the Qur’an was very representative in regards to Jesus. Also, Muslims admit that Mary conceived via divine intervention. Therefore, how is it that Jesus would not be divine?
      There is misunderstanding among Muslims and even Christians that Jesus in human form had limitations like all of us, it does not mean that his essence was one with the father. If God was not in a human body then his sacrifice in the cross and prior torture would mean nothing.
      In human form God related closer to human suffering and thus show humanity that giving our free will we can also overcome much sacrifices as well but that our spirit or soul is eternal and thus death is conquered- body dies but not the soul.

    • @shuvo7912
      @shuvo7912 4 місяці тому +1

      Both Christians and Muslims believe in Jesus (peace be upon him). So where is the problem here? Jesus (peace be upon him) did not say that those who do not accept him as God will go to hell.

  • @decolongon2012
    @decolongon2012 5 місяців тому +18

    In every sin you made, there is always a price to pay. In every transgression you have done, there is a consequence to be paid, you may be forgiven but you must pay the price.. but thanks to Jesus, he paid it all..

  • @lessardo87
    @lessardo87 4 місяці тому +130

    The Muslim AI keeps quoting John 5:30 but in the context of the rest of the chapter, Jesus is talking about being one with the father, rather than a polytheistic deity. He is saying that if you separate him from the father, and therefore make him a separate deity, he would be nothing, as God is one deity. The problem with this video is they debate verses, not chapters, and don’t provide context from other books within the Bible.

    • @superarrow4972
      @superarrow4972 4 місяці тому +21

      Muslim do this in real life as well

    • @jomama8577
      @jomama8577 4 місяці тому +5

      @lessardo87 the issue with your statement is the *and therfore make him a separate deity*. I belive that I am one with God. But I do not think that I am a deity. I belive this meaning to be the same as the saying * we were all of one mind* meaning in agreement or alignment.

    • @dandriabarnett523
      @dandriabarnett523 4 місяці тому +1

      @@jomama8577wow, perfect explanation

    • @henryodera5726
      @henryodera5726 4 місяці тому +2

      Does polytheism even come up anywhere in John 5? Having read John 5, I take it that your interpretation may have something to do with the wording in John 5:18, where John writes that the Jews were seeking to kill Jesus because they interpreted His actions as Him making Himself equal with God?
      Is this what you have interpreted to mean that the Jews thought Jesus was making Himself a second deity, and that Jesus then spoke the words in John 5:30 as part of a long teaching where He was declaring Himself not to be a second deity, but a second person of the one deity?

    • @henryodera5726
      @henryodera5726 4 місяці тому

      That's not what John 5:30, or John 5 is about. You were right that John 5:30 is part of a passage where Jesus is testifying that He is one with the Father. But He isn't testifying to the Jews that He's God. He's testifying to them that He is one with God.
      The way that He is one with the Father according to John 5 includes:
      1. He seeks to do the Father's will and not His own. In this way, both Jesus and the Father are seeking to accomplish one individual's will - the Father's (see John 5:30).
      2. He does nothing on His own except He sees the Father doing it. What He does is not what He comes up with Himself, but what the Father shows Him to do. In this way, Jesus' actions are the Father's (see John 5:19-21; compare v26).
      3. His power and authority is from the Father (not from Himself). In this way, both Jesus and the Father are operating with the same authority and power of one individual - the Father (see John 5:27; compare v30; see also John 5:21 compare vv26-27).

  • @bernadettenorton1825
    @bernadettenorton1825 2 місяці тому +3

    Excellent debate 👍🏼… the Truth always wins …..

  • @Zamstein
    @Zamstein 5 місяців тому +51

    The concept of allowing Himself to be limited by human form is actually quite interesting, because God without limitations is merely omnipotent as a characteristic. However being omnipotent WITH limitations and surpassing them, is omnipotent in action. It’s actually proving it and showing it, if there’s nothing to overcome you can’t really qualify yourself as an omnipotent. It’s like saying you’re courageous and brave, but you’ve never faced anything that made you afraid.

    • @GabeM972
      @GabeM972 5 місяців тому +3

      Interesting input, I've never seen people point this out. Gave me something to think about

    • @Blkswan911
      @Blkswan911 4 місяці тому

      Money

    • @TTellKey
      @TTellKey 4 місяці тому

      Bullseye!

    • @TTellKey
      @TTellKey 4 місяці тому +7

      "Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;"
      Philippians 2:6
      "No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of My own accord. I have authority to lay it down and authority to take it up again. This charge I have received from My Father.”
      John 10:18

    • @GabeM972
      @GabeM972 4 місяці тому +4

      @@TTellKey That's one of my favorite Bible verses, give me chills Everytime. It's like Christ had everything to boast about with Him being God Himself but instead He humbled Himself to the lowest of lows.

  • @richardromero5452
    @richardromero5452 4 місяці тому +113

    The Quran was written about 600 years after Jesus, in the early 7th century. So, for accurate information about Jesus, would you trust those who lived with him and met him (the Gospel), or someone who came 600 years later?

    • @yizuss69
      @yizuss69 4 місяці тому +15

      And the ones who lived with him contradicted each other. The Bible is full of fallacies and contradictions as per the video shown as well. It’s about time you go back to the real Bible or come to Quran that affirms the previous revelations.

    • @moibrahim7645
      @moibrahim7645 4 місяці тому +7

      Trinity was innovated

    • @KhanBaba-p6k
      @KhanBaba-p6k 4 місяці тому +1

      It is the god who provides and gives he knowledge and information .

    • @nomaan1978
      @nomaan1978 4 місяці тому +3

      God never forgets and always knows truth. He can reveal history more perfectly than any human to his Prophets.

    • @Mvelasco777
      @Mvelasco777 4 місяці тому

      Revelation 22:18 - For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.

  • @BathwaterBender
    @BathwaterBender 5 місяців тому +75

    As hilarious as this AI "civility" is, it certainly portrays our own reality, perfectly. Just in the first 6 minutes alone, a Muslim making an argument, receiving an answer, then asking the same question again with a few different words just to get the same answer a different but identical way, lmao. This is the reality of debating a Muslim. Bravo 👏

    • @Daltron5K
      @Daltron5K 5 місяців тому +9

      #facts

    • @NightmareRex6
      @NightmareRex6 5 місяців тому

      yea i woulda deducted points everytime a narrative is recycled. its true becuase bible/koran says so! it says its true! but what about that politition that says they talk only truth so thats true for that corrupt politition too?....

    • @shajidrahaman
      @shajidrahaman 3 місяці тому

      Its genuinely just getting the exact same response from the christian AI every time. The christian AI never addresses the point that the muslim ai makes (in part 1 at least) which is that god has no reason to become a human.

  • @belindagriffin5868
    @belindagriffin5868 5 місяців тому +57

    I noticed halfway thru the muslim AI stopped quoting the Quran and started using Bible scriptures.

    • @raulmartinez429
      @raulmartinez429 5 місяців тому

      Because the Koran lack of information and a true divine solid foundation. So the Muslim AI had to use the true divine source of life = the Bible 😁

    • @school-replacement
      @school-replacement 5 місяців тому +19

      Bro said The Bible is corrupted and then started using Bible verses.

    • @rxyy4ne560
      @rxyy4ne560 4 місяці тому +6

      @@school-replacement if someone believes in a book, then you would use that book to show that their belief is flawed, even if that book is corrupted because it is stupid to use a book A to show that book B is corrupt when you can just use the corrupted parts of book B to show that book B is corrupted and flawed. This stupid argeument of "oh you think the bible is corrupt then why use it to prove your point?" You live your whole life abiding by this book, why would you believe the quran if i used quranic verses if you dont believe in it? It seems christians cant think their arguements through,.

    • @jixxytrix1705
      @jixxytrix1705 4 місяці тому

      @@rxyy4ne560 No, when book B claims to be a continuation, a sequel, to book A
      you present the many inconsistencies between the books. For that you will need book A.
      Both Mohammed and Jesus do that. Jesus claims to be the fulfillment of the Old Testament
      And I can easily show you how He fulfills the Old Testament. Here are prophecies detailing the Messiah......
      'the Lord himself will give you a sign.
      Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son,
      and shall call his name Immanuel' (God with us)
      (Isaiah 7:14)
      'For to us a child is born,
      to us a son is given;
      and the government shall be upon his shoulder,
      and his name shall be called
      Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
      Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace' (Isaiah 9:6)
      And also.....
      'He was despised and rejected by men,
      a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief;
      and as one from whom men hide their faces
      he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
      Surely he has borne our griefs
      and carried our sorrows;
      yet we esteemed him stricken,
      smitten by God, and afflicted.
      But he was pierced for our transgressions;
      he was crushed for our iniquities;
      upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace,
      and with his wounds we are healed.
      All we like sheep have gone astray;
      we have turned-every one-to his own way;
      and the Lord has laid on him
      the iniquity of us all' (Isaiah 53)
      A.ka Jesus Christ, The Son of God

    • @ironwox
      @ironwox 4 місяці тому +3

      Cause the Bible contradicts itself.

  • @ashroland306
    @ashroland306 5 місяців тому +294

    Jesus Christ is the king of all kings,,,the alpha and omega..to him be all the glory..

    • @onlyenzoYT
      @onlyenzoYT 5 місяців тому +6

      Amen

    • @PsalmInstrumentalWorship
      @PsalmInstrumentalWorship 5 місяців тому +5

      Amen!!!

    • @ebcsecurity9490
      @ebcsecurity9490 5 місяців тому +3

      All top Christian scholars say the "alpha, omega" line is from a fabricated verse lol

    • @lowballinn
      @lowballinn 5 місяців тому

      @@ebcsecurity9490Lol how? Literally no one says that, bring me evidence that it is fabricated (keep in mind everything q ehave is from the earliest manuscripts, and if not it is marked. John 14:6 is found in the earliest manuscripts.)

    • @ebcsecurity9490
      @ebcsecurity9490 5 місяців тому

      @@lowballinn These are the names of the first and last letters of the GREEK!!!!! alphabet. That alone tells you all you need to know. But moving on. The additional occurrence of this phrase in the King James rendering of Revelation 1:11, however, does not receive support from some of the oldest Greek manuscripts, including the Alexandrine, Sinaitic, and Codex Ephraemi rescriptus. It is, therefore, omitted in many modern translations. Because its an interpolation (fabrication).

  • @franroxburgh6055
    @franroxburgh6055 5 місяців тому +50

    Someone forgot to programme these AI bots with a short-term memory! They keep repeating the same verses over and over again!

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +13

      Great point. Part of the programming included "I review previous responses and never repeat the same question or answer or scripture."
      But one of the AIs (even though both were configured with the identical method) chose to override my programming with what it thought was the best approach to answering the opponent's question.

    • @Soulwrite7
      @Soulwrite7 5 місяців тому +3

      To be fair, humans and scripture are fans of repetition when it comes to argument construction.
      AI lacking sentience and as a simple learning model, learns from the data and instruction given; as such is it no wonder then that it has incorporated a degree of repetition.

    • @kierinsusukaii4745
      @kierinsusukaii4745 5 місяців тому +1

      @@JonOleksiuk that's normal because sometimes hearing something isn't enough the first time it is heard.
      It's like if I said "I'll be arriving with a nice looking lamborghini" and so when I arrive you would be expecting a Lamborghini... BUT if I don't come with a car that looks like a lamborghini then what just happened?? Well it's Word play... nice looking Lamborghini states my car is indeed a lamborghini that looks nice so it's explicit... but a car that looks like a lamborghini really means a car that only "looks like" a lamborhini although plenty people will assume i meant an actual lamborghini if I said that it's only implied by them and not explicit... so sometimes repeating is necessary because when someone hear what you say they either allow it to replay in their head and slightly meditate on the words or lose focus and assume

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +2

      got it...i think... maybe i'll read that again, lol

    • @kierinsusukaii4745
      @kierinsusukaii4745 5 місяців тому +1

      @@JonOleksiuk I edited it so it makes a bit more sense.. I typed it when I was about to sleep last time so I seen alot of errors

  • @qword
    @qword 2 місяці тому

    idk why the latest comments are filled with hate. as an agnostic guy with ex muslim background, i enjoyed this a lot. nothing like this has hit my youtube homepage before (i hate human debates as i don't find them convincing for either side because of our human egos, which AIs do not posess.) i subbed & can't wait for more vids.

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  2 місяці тому

      thanks for the sub, and i appreciate your comment... more videos on the way :)

  • @EggChen6DemonBag
    @EggChen6DemonBag 5 місяців тому +91

    If this AI Muslim was debating Christian Prince, the Muslim would have zero points. :D

    • @tysolbohan6446
      @tysolbohan6446 5 місяців тому +5

      Just no an ai adapts based on the arguments it can very easily provide counter arguments

    • @aalileghari6195
      @aalileghari6195 5 місяців тому +4

      Christian prince would have zero answers if the Ai provided one alteration in the bible with proof.... Christian prince would not be able to talk after that. Unless he would kick the Muslim Ai of his stream after by calling him names and abdool😂

    • @Legittuber
      @Legittuber 5 місяців тому

      Lol yep you got that right

    • @Doing-Goods
      @Doing-Goods 5 місяців тому

      ​@aalileghari6195 even if there is an alteration that doesn't mean anything. The Quran had been changed many times over centuries and the original version had been burned. Just because someone changed around some words that doesn't mean the entire thing is infallible. It means you have to go by more original and accurate texts, not the queen James bible or Mormon bible and whatnot

    • @ZombieChicken-X
      @ZombieChicken-X 5 місяців тому

      @@aalileghari6195 The Quran has alterations... are you ill?

  • @ankelos913
    @ankelos913 3 місяці тому +12

    Fascinating! Enjoyed it from beginning to end.

  • @vhadianv
    @vhadianv 5 місяців тому +52

    See how when the muslim ai gets questioned bout the bible literaly verbatim saying “Jesus is God” it just says “oh yeah i forgot, the bible is corrupt” 😂

    • @QUANTPAPA
      @QUANTPAPA 5 місяців тому +1

      the bible you have is not even close to what it was. its chanced by govermand for there own intrest. but believe what you wanne believe.

    • @vhadianv
      @vhadianv 5 місяців тому +1

      @@QUANTPAPA I will believe what I want to, because the Lord has warned to whom changes the word, their name shall be jotted out of the book of life. The Lord has also created a book with 63,779 cross references with 40 different authors. Hundreds of prophecies in the Old Testament fulfilled by Jesus in the New Testament, and hundreds from the New Testament fulfilled in modern times. The Quran only has 6,236 cross references excluding Bismillah and 6,348 Including Bismillah. No confirmed author and gets science wrong. The Quran claims that sperm is made in the area between the backbone and ribs, which is scientifically incorrect.

    • @MrURBETTA
      @MrURBETTA 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@QUANTPAPAso when the Bible says God's word is eternal, that part is corrupted since we don't the original Torah and Injeel. if Jesus is God, what would be the best way for the devil to make people disbelieve. Oh yes, the Quran.

    • @QUANTPAPA
      @QUANTPAPA 4 місяці тому

      @@MrURBETTA jesus was send by god not god him self. and govermand and kings chance the bible to there own desire, there still original parts in it but a lot is chanced overtime, jesus him self prayt to god. he put his head on the ground. the jews did not acept jesus, and still wait for him. but both books torah and bible long ago was valid books, if you look back to the native language of jesus ( aramaic ) google : aramaic word for god. when the anti christ come, jews will follow him bc the still wait for jesus and did not accept the real jesus from the bible, and christians will also follow him bc the know jesus will come back. but the anti christ will claim he is jesus and later on jesus will come back to kill the falls mesia, and later on he will even claim to by god. also moslim believe that jesus will come back peace to him, to destroy antichris/ dajjal.

    • @Dis-u7p
      @Dis-u7p 4 місяці тому +1

      @@MrURBETTA Meanwhile, Jewish and Jehovah's Witnesses exist 👀 enjoy the show 🍿

  • @hovhannesjulfayan5424
    @hovhannesjulfayan5424 5 днів тому +1

    The idea is great to use AI. Can I ask you, which AI generator are you using to make those videos?

  • @jacobsanchezbejarano9550
    @jacobsanchezbejarano9550 5 місяців тому +42

    The AI doesn't understand humility. Submission of the Son to the will of the Father is the greatest example of humility.
    He made the will of the Father, He gave all the glory to the Father.
    Perfect humility, for that reason God put His Son at His right hand in His throne, and gave Him all power and authority.
    The Father gives testimony of His Son. The Son gives testimony of the Father.
    The Holy Ghost gives testimony of the Father and the Son.

    • @deborahsmith5285
      @deborahsmith5285 5 місяців тому

      This is a good reason why the Trinity doesn't work.
      YHWH is the only true and living God; there is no one like Him; there is nothing too hard for Him.

    • @simitaiwo4798
      @simitaiwo4798 5 місяців тому +1

      @@deborahsmith5285Trinity works perfectly
      1. God
      2. God has a spirit which means the spirit is still God
      3. God spirits formed flesh , which means still God.
      It’s the same God that has a spirit that formed flesh .
      In Judaism God has always had an inseparable spirit. Islam comes to contradicts Gods nature even when 4:171 clearly states that Allah has a spirit and he breathes that spirit upon Mary womb to form a pure boy that will be a sign and mercy to mankind.

    • @seasquawker
      @seasquawker 5 місяців тому

      Isaiah 48:16

    • @mattmangano5863
      @mattmangano5863 4 місяці тому

      ​@@deborahsmith5285So, if there's "nothing too hard for Him" based on your words, then He can do what you're saying He can't do (be a Trinity)

  • @beatposse2011
    @beatposse2011 5 місяців тому +15

    Not a Muslim nor a Christian just trying to speak objectively here,
    everything that I'm going to say is with utmost respect to my fellow
    Muslims and fellow Christians.
    This debate falls short because the Muslim AI keeps quoting the bible
    to disprove Jesus' divinity, which is like trying to extinguish a fire
    using gasoline.
    That makes it seem like the Muslim AI thinks that both
    The Holy Bible and The Holy Quran are both at the same time the word
    of God (which cannot be because both contradict each other on the very
    point that this debate is based around) while trying to interpret the
    bible verses to suit his narrative.
    Found it interesting that there is no direct talk of the crucifixion,
    resurrection and ascension of Jesus (from both perspectives) which is
    a very important point to bring in a debate like this.
    Finally, taking a look at the uploader's channel, you can see that
    he's clearly Christian and did upload videos preaching Christianity in
    the past, so how can we ensure objectivity and fairness here and can
    he make sure that his personal beliefs didn't interfere with training
    the AIs (even at a subconscious level)?

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +4

      good points, this weekend i'm hoping to do another video featuring an atheist and theist using 14 different models as judges, asking them to create their own criteria for judging the arguments....we'll see how it goes.

    • @sheepwolf921
      @sheepwolf921 4 місяці тому +1

      well you clearly don't know a whole lot about Christians. By very nature and virtue to be like Christ is to be honest , unbiased , and loving . a true Christian follows the teachings.. what i say , being a former atheist and Muslim...read the Bible and it will be abundantly clear to you. Dont take my word for it , check yourself smarty pants i bet you are pretty intelligent and will realize how much in our life is lied to us.

    • @dinoyacine7318
      @dinoyacine7318 4 місяці тому

      @@sheepwolf921 but all people can t be honest some would do anyting to seem right so your point is cercular because i said the wold is not in the woods he is not in the woods kinda logic and u bieng a former muslim allah yahdic akhi

    • @justarshad8354
      @justarshad8354 4 місяці тому

      100%
      This youtuber fooling the kids but we the mature educated audience knows what he is up to!

    • @rudiporter9352
      @rudiporter9352 4 місяці тому

      ​@@JonOleksiukI think that is a great idea. Please post it.

  • @thepatriot7112
    @thepatriot7112 5 місяців тому +24

    the Tora was complete before islam existed and the Tora does not mention allah. Christians are not to reconcile anything to any part of kuran.
    Christ did as he did to teach People how to live as a child of God.

    • @faisalabdelkarim6457
      @faisalabdelkarim6457 4 місяці тому +1

      Ask Jews if Allah is the same God in their books, they will say yes. Islam is Monotheistim Allah is the God of Moses and Jesus. While Jew don't believe in Jesus, in Islam Jesus and Moses are our prophets, the Quran is the last testament, the Quran abrogates the old and new testament.

    • @berkelianator
      @berkelianator 4 місяці тому

      @@faisalabdelkarim6457no it doesn’t because the Quran wouldn’t say kill all unbelievers if the Jews believed in the same God they would not have fought them

    • @trustmeimcool
      @trustmeimcool 2 місяці тому

      @@faisalabdelkarim6457 yeah totally. allah is totally the god of the jews despite having 0 continuity with the old testament. nice one einstein

  • @antbrown9066
    @antbrown9066 3 місяці тому

    Interesting..the scoring system is something that would be extremely difficult to quantify - so the discussion is more interesting and worthwhile listening to than than the scoring.

  • @mdg72584
    @mdg72584 4 місяці тому +50

    I find this fascinating. Try using the original Hebrew as input to see if the interpretation comes out the same. There is a lot of debate on if what we read in English is the intended translation or if something else was said instead. When the AI emphasizes a specific word, I always wonder if the original was written that way or if it was an interpretation

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  4 місяці тому +20

      uploading a new video tomorrow that will debate the reliability of the New Testament, part of the debate will include the models using the original language found in the manuscript... consider subscribing not to miss it :)

    • @stephennapier8365
      @stephennapier8365 3 місяці тому

      Good point. I find English is a lazy language and context is lost a lot in Christian studies because the original Hebrew/Greek isn't considered.

    • @stephennapier8365
      @stephennapier8365 3 місяці тому +1

      ​@@JonOleksiukI'm interested in watching your video for your take on translation.

    • @mranderson1635
      @mranderson1635 3 місяці тому

      @@JonOleksiuk

    • @artifacthunter1472
      @artifacthunter1472 3 місяці тому

      @@stephennapier8365 English has no depth. God chose to reveal his true word in Greek. We have the textus receptus the revealed received text. It has no contradictions like the English KJV version which has plenty of mistakes from the Catholic translators. But the KJV comes from the correct text while modern translations do not.

  • @chrisazure1624
    @chrisazure1624 5 місяців тому +20

    The quran claims to affirm the Torah. Ignoring the sacrificial system is an inconsistency

    • @rafaeljonathanmonterrosoca8400
      @rafaeljonathanmonterrosoca8400 5 місяців тому +2

      You are right because Islam claims falsely claims as Abraham who offered Isaac as a sacrifice to God!!

    • @chrisazure1624
      @chrisazure1624 5 місяців тому +3

      @@rafaeljonathanmonterrosoca8400 The Quran does not claim Abraham offered Issac.
      The Quran completely ignores the Mosaic sacrificial system while claiming Moses as its prophet.

    • @EarlyBirdSlim
      @EarlyBirdSlim 4 місяці тому +1

      messiah king yahusha was the sacrificial lamb. We don't need to sacrifice to animals more

    • @chrisazure1624
      @chrisazure1624 4 місяці тому +1

      @EarlyBirdSlim True. But they deny Jesus sacrifice.

  • @LittleRedBooklets
    @LittleRedBooklets 5 місяців тому +18

    Amazing work my friend. When is the next AI debate?? I’m hooked! 😅

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +7

      AMAZING, thanks for the encouraging note. this is a weekend/evenings hobby for me.... i'm trying to get the next one out as soon as i can. Hopefully by end of week, consider subscribing so you don't miss it!

    • @jbeard3390
      @jbeard3390 5 місяців тому

      ​@JonOleksiuk i need a video of how you set this ai up. I would like to add that ai's need to set context and can only use verses once but can use a verse twice if the other ai uses their one use the other could reference it and some other rules

  • @isaacjrpkiat-ong9499
    @isaacjrpkiat-ong9499 2 місяці тому

    The scoring is done by an unbiased judge 😂😂😂
    Nice debate
    Those AI did not seek to destroy someone's religion they stayed focus on the topics.
    👍👍👍👍

  • @LuLuBell
    @LuLuBell 4 місяці тому +17

    This was uplifting and informative!!❤Thanks!

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  4 місяці тому +1

      You are so welcome! Thanks for the comment and support :)

  • @finishstrongcycling2355
    @finishstrongcycling2355 3 місяці тому +124

    When I consider the Muslim claim that a text written by single man 600 years after Jesus, about Jesus, carries more weight than that of the eyewitnesses themselves, it really makes me question the soundness of their belief. I also take issue with the Muslim AI saying that God forgives unilaterally without atonement. Both Christianity and Islam have the patriarch Abraham, who faithully practiced the offering of sacrifices. Atonement was always necessary, even from the beginning after the fall. God's approval of Abel's sacrifice and rejection of Cain's bears witness to that.

    • @abdulrahmanhaffar3502
      @abdulrahmanhaffar3502 3 місяці тому +10

      İbrahim didn't believe in sacrifices in order to forgiveness, and you don't understand that when God sends a revelation it doesn't matter when because God is all knowing and therefore he can tell anything many years laters, the Bible didn't been written by eyewitness, you should know that most of the writers of the Bible are anonymous according to historians while Muhammed and the people who wrote the verses that had been revealed upon him are not anonymous person,and Quran have authenity while the Bible don't, and the bible is been changed over 3000 times while the Quran after it fully been revealed never been changed after that

    • @dadiabetic1174
      @dadiabetic1174 3 місяці тому +6

      @@abdulrahmanhaffar3502please use periods I barley understand what you are saying and despite the fact that the scriptures are anonymous we still know who wrote them through other people.

    • @RAY_FILET
      @RAY_FILET 3 місяці тому

      ​@@dadiabetic1174no periods would surely render a Muslim illiterate. I was able to read your sentence with incorrect punctuation and spelling. Are you being serious right now? That might be the dumbest response I've read on here.

    • @abdulrahmanhaffar3502
      @abdulrahmanhaffar3502 3 місяці тому +6

      @@dadiabetic1174 actually, more scholars says that we don't know who they are, that's why they are called "anonymous"

    • @abdulrahmanhaffar3502
      @abdulrahmanhaffar3502 3 місяці тому +5

      @@dadiabetic1174 I'm saying that the Bible doesn't have any authority, there's over 3000 bible in the world, it's been said that the Bible had been changed thousands of times, and the Bible is written from anonymous humans,the Bible is not the revelation of God but rather the word of humankind,so for all this reasons and more the Bible today isn't the word of God,therefore you can't do a religion based on it, that's what I'm saying

  • @tomcahill7056
    @tomcahill7056 5 місяців тому +14

    Saul became Paul sticking to the Christian Jesus until the end

  • @Xobaer
    @Xobaer 2 місяці тому +2

    Its good to see Christian AI at lest have knowledge of the bible when human debates they are unparalleled due to lack of biblical knowledge and memorisation. It would be interesting to see @muhammadhijab destroying ai arguments.

    • @rahimheerida8165
      @rahimheerida8165 2 місяці тому

      One question Christianity collapses
      Is God dying or not?

  • @strykah41
    @strykah41 4 місяці тому +16

    Great debate and perspectives. May God bless all his people!

    • @shuvo7912
      @shuvo7912 4 місяці тому

      Both Christians and Muslims believe in Jesus (peace be upon him). So where is the problem here? Jesus (peace be upon him) did not say that those who do not accept him as God will go to hell.

  • @youknowploysi4432
    @youknowploysi4432 5 місяців тому +10

    The AI imo could have answered much better than it did by elaborating on psalm 22. Psalm 22 is not about the abandonment rather the call and certainty that god will come and aid him. IMO that makes the argument stronger by explaining that “my god my god, why have you forsaken me” means rather when are you coming and that the time has come to fufill the prophesy. Because after he says it the storm on the cross ends and atonement for humanity has been completed. Psalms 22 even ends on “he has done it”. I recommend everyone read or listen to psalm 22, it is a beautiful chapter.

  • @abcmaya
    @abcmaya 5 місяців тому +66

    The great thing about the gospel is that you have Jesus Christ as your representative. And because Jesus is God himself, there's no power in the universe that can stop him from bringing you to heaven.

    • @missflipz
      @missflipz 5 місяців тому +3

      👏👏👏 Amen to that 🙏🏼

    • @Yassine3333222222
      @Yassine3333222222 5 місяців тому

      If Jesus is truly God, why does he need to learn from God? In **John 8:28**, Jesus says he speaks only what the Father has taught him. Did he lose his memory and forgot that he's God!? If he is omniscient, why would he need teachings? This challenges the idea that he's God.

    • @missflipz
      @missflipz 5 місяців тому +2

      @@Yassine3333222222God is Spirit. Jesus came in the flesh ‘from God’ . His fleshly earthly life was temporary to teach us all things. When he went back to the Father the promise of the gospel is that those who call on the Name of Jesus, in prayer, will receive the Holy Spirit from the Father.
      And Jesus said WE will come and make our home with you.
      So Christ within us is the kingdom come to earth, as it is in heaven.
      And he tells us to Ask Anything in his Name. In prayer. So when we pray to Our Father, in Jesus’ name, they both are ONE in Spirit. Inseparable.

    • @Yassine3333222222
      @Yassine3333222222 5 місяців тому

      @@missflipz You said he came to teach us, but the problem, he himself is learning from God. That's the problem. And there's very important question, Jesus never called himself God or ordered us to call him God. Do we have the right to do so!? From where we got that right!? A flesh from God is the same concept as a prophet from God. Same thing.

    • @CG_Motions
      @CG_Motions 5 місяців тому

      @@Yassine3333222222 He his not learning from the Father, he his showing how we should have a relationship with the Father.

  • @kevinclint7588
    @kevinclint7588 5 місяців тому +191

    JESUS CHRIST IS THE GREAT I AM,……………. AMEN TO THAT ❤

    • @celestialknight2339
      @celestialknight2339 5 місяців тому

      The problem is that these statements only appear in the Gospel of John, which scholars now recognize as being historically unreliable. The New Testament has 4 Gospels (Mark, Matthew, Luke, and John), and we can only find these “I Am” declarations in the last of the four (John) - which was written latest, contains provable fabrications (e.g. John 7:53-8:11), and contradicts the previous Synoptic gospels which never ONCE quote Jesus as making these “I Am” statements, which would be unthinkable for them to ignore or forget if they actually happened.
      The truth is: stories about Jesus grew and developed over time, and his image & status was embellished as the years and decades went on. Mix that in with the highly probably Roman pagan influence from their idolatrous next-door neighbors (whose theology was swamped in ‘sons of God’ and human incarnations), that it’s clear to see what modern Christianity teaches today was not what Jesus himself claimed.
      Islam takes us back to the original historical truth, which is that God is one (Mark 12:29), He alone is the source of goodness (which Jesus denied in Mark 10:18), and He alone-even in John’s Gospel-is “The ONLY TRUE GOD” (John 17:3).
      I encourage you to read the Qur’an, God’s final revelation to humanity. It clarifies all things, and guides believers to the most upright truth and will of the Creator :) Peace.

    • @bobbyhempel1513
      @bobbyhempel1513 5 місяців тому

      ​@jobayermasud5403 read the Bible.

    • @saviovaz2903
      @saviovaz2903 5 місяців тому +11

      ​@jobayermasud5403 Hmm, THE NAME - "YAHWEY🙏 (Holy Above ALL) - I AM : is the same name reviled to Moses. Nefarious mouse-slimes claim to worship the same God, whilst not knowing "not Only" the Name of God of Abraham, Isaac & Jacob but also God's True Nature.

    • @celestialknight2339
      @celestialknight2339 5 місяців тому +2

      @@saviovaz2903 The fact that you insult Muslims (which simply means ‘one who surrenders their life to God’) shows just which God you truly serve. Also, we believe in the same God of Abraham - and “YHWH” simply means ‘The Eternal & Absolute One’ which is also God’s name & title in the Qur’an (‘As-Samad’; see Sūrah 112). Oh and by the way, nobody actually knows for sure how YHWH (the Tetragrammaton) was pronounced, because it was lost over time since only the high priest ever recited it. So by your own logic, you don’t know the name of God either.
      And if that wasn’t bad enough, let’s not forget that the Gospels and New Testament never use the name “Yahwey” for God even ONCE. So, why are you using hypocritical double-standards? I hope you repent.
      As Christians do you only resent us because we believe in God, and what was revealed to us, and what was revealed before, and because most of you are rebellious sinners?

    • @KidBasher99
      @KidBasher99 5 місяців тому +4

      @@celestialknight2339womp womp

  • @samrothe1076
    @samrothe1076 5 місяців тому +5

    Thank you so much for this. What a wonderful starting point for conversations about Jesus' divinity.

  • @noahwamalwa4385
    @noahwamalwa4385 5 місяців тому +33

    it is embarrassment of extraordinary proportions for muslim to claim the bible has been changed when their prophet took an oath using the torah

    • @aalileghari6195
      @aalileghari6195 5 місяців тому

      That's just false statements.

    • @Mickey-is2xu
      @Mickey-is2xu 5 місяців тому +4

      You are 100 procent right
      Tru story, Jezus is god
      And not a profeet
      Moslims think Jezus is a Moslims
      Did Jezus take the sahada
      I dont tink so
      I no fore sure
      God blesss you 1❤

    • @Mickey-is2xu
      @Mickey-is2xu 5 місяців тому +2

      I no fore sure that Jezus did not Thake the shahada
      At that time the qoran was no where to find

    • @Yeshua_Ha_Mashiac
      @Yeshua_Ha_Mashiac 5 місяців тому +10

      The problem is, Muslims don't actually read their own Qu'ran, because they say: "Bible and Torah were corrupted/changed by men." Which is in disagreement with their god "Allah", who says:
      1) "Torah and Bible are the word of God" (Qur'an Surah 2:41, 3:3, 5:43-48).
      2) "Words of God cannot be corrupted" (Qur'an Surah 6:115, 18:27).
      3) Jesus says "I am the Way, The Truth, and The Life, no man can come to the Father except through me" (Bible, John 14:6).
      4) If you believe the Qu'ran, you must then believe the Bible - which then cancels the Qu'ran.
      A true Muslim is an ex-Muslim.

    • @Imperialmonke
      @Imperialmonke 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Yeshua_Ha_Mashiacthe fact that you clearly didnt do further research or even look at the tafseer for these basic answers shows your competence. Go on and search up the clear tafseer and answers to your “contridictions”.

  • @wbmjunior0
    @wbmjunior0 Місяць тому +2

    18:30 the debate should have finished here because the Muslim AI's justification left common ground and entered the Q'uran. Rookie move

  • @ChufaachupZs
    @ChufaachupZs 5 місяців тому +16

    This is great! Looking forward for more AI debates!

  • @zeazeaimm7922
    @zeazeaimm7922 4 місяці тому +45

    "Does the AI system judge arguments based on its comprehensive pre-existing knowledge, thereby understanding the context of both sides, or does it evaluate the arguments purely based on the information presented in the discussions, without any additional background knowledge?"

    • @ReligionOfSacrifice
      @ReligionOfSacrifice 4 місяці тому

      Any rebuttal might been seen as stronger by an A.I.
      One works by hand and one can work without hands and why?
      Daniel 9:27 "He shall be firm in a covenant with many for one week, yet in the midst of a week shall he stop to make sacrifice in the wing. Abomination! The one who spreads desolation spreads desolation even until complete consummation, for the decree that shall be, is a flowing forth."
      Revelation 12:12b-14 “The false one has come to fall, possessing great wrath, seeing his hold is a short time, for the dragon perceiving a casting out of the Earth shall pursue a woman who gives birth to a male with two wings, it is a great Eagle loving the woman, an order of things, to fly in a wilderness, her place where there is nourishment, time, time, the cutting off time, in the presence of the serpent.”
      1) BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA - (the firm week) of 8 years
      First time as 2009-2012 - Second time 2013-2016
      2) DONALD TRUMP - The Cut-Off time
      2017-2020
      3) JOE BIDEN - an image of a beast time, in the midst of a week, of an image of his time, desolation in Jerusalem to spread to all the world - for then cometh Annihilation, the perishing of the end.
      SO WHAT IS THE STORY THAT PEOPLE OUGHT TO KNOW???
      Amos 1:6-7 “For thus saith Yahweh, “for three transgressions of Gaza, four, I will not revoke being against: they capture people at peace with them (1) and bring them to be shut up (2), bloody (3). And send fire over the wall of Gaza (4), and consume all of the citadels.”
      Habakkuk 1:9-11 "All come, Hamas, assemble the horde of the east, gather the captives like sand. Mock the ruler, and their judgment a joke, laugh as all strongholds become rubble, seize them, then pass through like the wind, pass through guilty by the strength of your god.”
      Obadiah 1:10-11 “from out of Hamas, your brother, a deceiver, cover your shame, and you will be cut off forever. In that day you stood afar, on the day the strangers were carried away in strength. And the stranger entered to cast lots for Jerusalem, then you were one of them.”
      John 5:43 “I am come in My Father's name, and ye receive Me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.”
      Luke 10:18 “and He (Jesus) said, “I saw Satan as Barack Obama.”
      Micah 6:16 "It is owed unto America, and all who work the deed and the house Ahaz ("he has grasp the ten") and watch and keep you with their strange counsel. Walk in it for the purpose; I will give you up to desolation. And your inhabitants shall be a derision, for you will bear and be a reproach my people."
      Daniel 8:25 "and through his cunning treachery shall advance, the hand shall magnify the heart, ruining many, the quiet oppose the prince of princes, for he is broken without hand."
      Muslims must use their hands like October 7th, 2023, only they in Gaza Strip need West Bank to be in league with them.
      Hosea 10:10 “It is in my desire that I should chastise them; and the people shall be gathered against them, when they shall bind themselves in their two furrows (West Bank and Gaza Strip).”
      Obadiah 1:12-13 “Do not gloat over your brother’s day of taking strangers captive, nor rejoice in the day the sons of Judah are destroyed, do not boast in the day of distress. You should never enter at the gate of My people, in the day of their distress. Moreover do not gloat over their calamity in the day of their disaster, sending wealth in the day of disaster.”
      This is Revelation 11:7-15.
      Hosea 7:16 “Return ALLAH, deceive to ensnare their princes (the ten idiots from the remains of the Ottoman Empire who already had to deal with Arab Spring and the removal of kings in one month in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia), they shall fall by the sword of an insolent tongue, they mocking in the land of Egypt”
      Luke 17:24 “Only as Barack Obama exits heavens in one part and then thus exalts (Allah) Obama, then doeth the Son of man have His day.”
      Isaiah 14:14 "Allah Obama ab dama elyown."
      Habakkuk 3:11-13 "From the east the crescent stood at the heights, walking in the light of the weapons, the radiance of Barack (Husein Obama) from the thrust. There is indignation at his march on the Earth; in anger he trampled the nations. He went forth for the salvation of his people; for the salvation he's anointed. Now strike the head of the house of the wicked; lay him open from thigh to neck, commune with the Lifted High."
      Isaiah 14:27-31 "Yahweh is the head of a force of armies, who can plan to frustrate? If His hand is stretched out who can turn it back? For the year is the year of the brought down king, Ahaz ("ahaz" means "he has grasp the ten"). He is dead is the oracle to come. Rejoice not Palestine though now thee be whole, for the rod who struck has been broken. The serpent is at the root with a venom. It shall go forth as a fruit, a flying forth from the serpent. Those most hopeless shall lie down in bonds, and shall die at the root in need, for their remnant will be slain. Wail at the judgment, cry out city as you melt, O Palestine now whole. For smoke from the North, and none shall break rank."
      Why does Palestine whole means it melts? Xi and Putin never dreamed of prostration five times a day for seven years. Yet if the power of Christ Jesus confirms in Revelation 11:7-15, then they accept the confirmation and fight.
      Isaiah 14:16 "They that see thee shall squint, saying, "this the man who shakes the whole world? He shook merely the region of the first."
      Daniel 8:25 "and through his cunning treachery shall advance, the hand shall magnify the heart, ruining many, the quiet oppose the prince of princes, for he is broken without hand."
      Xi and Putin don't need to use their hands.
      2 Thessalonians 2:3-4 "Let not one in any way deceive, it come not unless apostasy of the first of mankind, lawlessness revealed in a Son of destruction. The opposition to appointment exalted above every so called god or object of worship, therefore sit in the temple of a god, and display thyself as that god."
      2 Thessalonians 2:8-9 “At that time a lawlessness will be Revelation. The demonstration, of which our Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth, abolishing at the appearing of His coming. One whose presence is in accordance with the power of Satan, all power of signs of falsehood marvelous.”
      Isaiah 14:18-19 "All the kings of the Earth shall lie down in a manner most glorious, each in a tomb, yet you shall be cast out of a tomb. An abhorrent branch, clothed with the slain yet pierced by a sword. Kneel to the ROCK and descend in a pit to be trampled as a corpse."
      NOW NOTE, IN THE REBUTTAL, PER THE QURAN, the Muslims who believe in Barack Hussein Obama are seriously fearful for their flesh melting in intense heat.
      Quran 13:11b-14a says, “Never doeth Allah change the condition of a people, excepting they change themselves, and Allah intendeth evil for all people, and there is no stopping him. Neither doeth he accept an equal. Barack is he who showeth you the face of Allah, giving a fear and a hope, though heavy the clouds and the thunder, exalt and prostrate to him, for even angels fear him, for he sendeth forth thunderbolts, striking whom he wills, while they dispute before the face of Allah, and he is severe in his attack. To him alone are the prayers in truth."
      Quran 7:45-47 says, “Who shall avert people from the path of Allah? And who will be declared the maker of deception? They were focused on the Hereafter, disbelievers. Between them shall be a barrier a family of men of Obama, who shall recognize them all by their markings. And one (Barack Obama) shall call out to the companions of Paradise, “PEACE ON YOU.” They shall not have entered, but shall have the assurance. And his eyes shall turn towards the people to be torched for they cry out, “Lord let us not be cast into fire among the wicked” but the man Obama shall say, “I know you by your looks, but none of your riches or pride of life shall avail you now, for these men have sworn that you may never earn the mercy of Allah.” Then he shall turn to his own BARACK (the blessing) shall say, “Come with me to paradise, for you will have nothing to fear, neither regret.””

    • @elnogga
      @elnogga 4 місяці тому +8

      "good question"

    • @iasmirh
      @iasmirh 4 місяці тому +1

      Think its the latter thats the problem, If it where different the christian would not get half the points

    • @ReligionOfSacrifice
      @ReligionOfSacrifice 4 місяці тому

      @@iasmirh, an A.I. figures a strength and gives points, then if there is a rebuttal and it seems to cover any major points it gives more points to the rebuttal. Unless a rebuttal was worthless it would always call the rebuttal better.
      Truth is never found by two people debating or by an evaluator no matter how how smart any speaker is. One has to evaluate the Holy Bible and the Quran on their own merit and that is how an answer between the two would be figured.
      The same would be true for something like Hinduism and Buddhism. What are the original texts and how much sense do they make, what points do they have, and is the logic of the book sound.
      Example: if Hinduism has ideas or images that are related to Christianity or Islam that does not strengthen any of the three.
      Rather does the Quran have a chance of being more accurate on Jesus for example is one thing worth evaluating? Are more witnesses with various testimony a strength or a weakness?
      If you and I both see a dolphin for the very first time in murky water are we likely to agree with each other? Is one of us more or less accurate? Does the fact that both of us witness make it more likely or less? If we agree on things yet disagree on things what does that even mean? Are your eyes better than mine? Do you have a better vocabulary than I? Who had a better vantage point of the circumstances? Who has familiarity with water animals and who doesn't? Furthermore, why had neither of us ever seen a dolphin before? How well can you study the witnesses?
      If I told you Muhammed had a specific way of wiping his ass and here was the chain of narration, and then you agree to it, if I then have some new regulations that control your life a lot more than how to wipe your ass and give same chain narration you agreed to why is the new information so quickly forthcoming centuries later on this man?

    • @SacralCrown
      @SacralCrown 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@iasmirhNo then the Christians would have double the points.

  • @queen-asia2184
    @queen-asia2184 4 місяці тому +52

    To all the people laughing that the Muslim AI had to use the Bible instead of the Quran: that is the smartest approach for this topic. The prompt is about proving Jesus isn’t God. The best way to do that is to use the Book about Jesus against that claim.
    I may be Christian but this scoring was ABSOLUTELY biased. I read the reasoning - at 13:04 and 21:45, scoring was erroneous

    • @caesarroe1283
      @caesarroe1283 4 місяці тому

      How can it be biased they are AI and they are scripted all the Quran and all the Bible verses they know all the verses?

    • @BRANDT409
      @BRANDT409 4 місяці тому +3

      I thought the Christian AI didn't use the Koran because the Bible was written first. & the Koran is just a Bible denomination.

    • @meto4837
      @meto4837 4 місяці тому

      Completely agree

    • @MoMo-is-one
      @MoMo-is-one 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@BRANDT409
      Go believe in a book we found it in a cave we don't know who is the writer of it and it's written 400years after Jesus
      While Quran is directly from God to the holy spirit to the prophet
      Till now We read it as the prophet Muhammad read it exactly
      we can't change a single vowel from it

    • @BRANDT409
      @BRANDT409 4 місяці тому +1

      Do you deny that the Bible was written before the Koran?

  • @dawiedekabouter5733
    @dawiedekabouter5733 14 годин тому

    This type of dialogue would be very useful to discover new science and engineering solutions to solve a problem based on objective reasoning.

  • @Dave-yy2ts
    @Dave-yy2ts 4 місяці тому +8

    This needs to be redone in real time once the 4o voice functionality becomes available.

  • @mazmundie
    @mazmundie 5 місяців тому +16

    Very well done setting this up, much appreciated

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +1

      thank you.

    • @I.Kat.
      @I.Kat. 5 місяців тому

      ​@@JonOleksiukA debate where they debate Mohammed's "moral understanding". 😂😂😂

  • @Ali_o.O
    @Ali_o.O 5 місяців тому +13

    Next debate Muslim AI Vs ex-muslim AI.

  • @Rob-ji7fx
    @Rob-ji7fx 2 дні тому

    If you read, the old testament, the new testament, and the Quran, you will conclude the Quran is derived from the other two writings, but is a major effort to change the fundamentals specifically commanded in the old and new testaments.

  • @BigIdeaSeeker
    @BigIdeaSeeker 5 місяців тому +17

    lol, the Lord of the universe won by a mere 18 points. This from an AI that simply accepts authority of the scriptures of two world religions, seemingly without question.

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +5

      oh my gosh, in youtube comments it shows that you've been subscribed to my channel for 10 years.
      Thanks for coming back for this video (the idea is a work in progress) and commenting.

    • @NightmareRex6
      @NightmareRex6 5 місяців тому +1

      peaople always call him "god of heaven and earth" notice they always leave out hell, in which 99% human population resides :(. yea god is "love" and nothing but "love"......

    • @tiredofmedialying
      @tiredofmedialying 5 місяців тому

      @@NightmareRex6 What gives the idea that most humans are in a bad place? It is rather disturbing to think most humans would go to a place of suffering for eternity, but the purgatory and grace ideas sound hopeful.

    • @ZombieChicken-X
      @ZombieChicken-X 5 місяців тому +1

      @@NightmareRex6 Hell is the absence of God

    • @Tee954
      @Tee954 4 місяці тому

      @@ZombieChicken-X Hell is the absence of God, yet somehow, we exist? Existence itself is something God constructed, thus Hell itself should be non-existence.

  • @chriswilliams-oh8yq
    @chriswilliams-oh8yq 5 місяців тому +6

    Its very interesting how by the end of the 1st discussion, the muslim ai was essentially the same question again and again, why would God need a sacrifice. The Christian AI says its because of Sin and Death, making the conversion abit cyclical.

  • @yhwhlungs
    @yhwhlungs 5 місяців тому +6

    Great video, I hope you make more! You should do a free-for-all with the most popular religion with this format. Include, athiesm and agnostic. Just for fun.

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +3

      currently working on the next one! thanks for the note and consider subscribing :)

  • @Smithandlabuchane
    @Smithandlabuchane 3 місяці тому +17

    Islam might be seen as clearer because it has a straightforward belief in one God (Allah) and well-defined practices like the Five Pillars. Its central text, the Qur'an, provides clear guidance for followers.

    • @aminiznasni4815
      @aminiznasni4815 2 місяці тому +2

      Islamic prayers are shallow and mechanical. You just recite and recite like a zombified parrot. I always felt bored when I used to pray in the mosque 🕌 this when I was not distracted by a yawning bearded guy next to me or the stinky feet smell of the carpets. Wake up and start using the remaining brain cells you have before being fully lobotomized. Saludos

    • @Perfected-Paragon
      @Perfected-Paragon 2 місяці тому +1

      That is because you did not understand the translation of Salah
      When you understand the translation you know what are talking about with God

    • @rc6289
      @rc6289 2 місяці тому

      @@Perfected-Paragon We as followers of Christ are not Slaves to Religion. We are Sons in a Relationship with YHWH. The Gospel Message is not about what you do for God but it is about what God has done for the entire world by Sending the Eternal Son of God so that we can Reconciliation with God and have the Assurance of Everlasting Life with him. Jesus is the Only way to the Father. There is many false and failing Messiahs taught who does not fulfill the Messianic Prophecies. If your Messiah does not pass the Foundation of the Gospel Message of Jesus in the Old Testament then you have the wrong Messiah. The New Testament shows the Fulfillment of the Gospel Message of Jesus Christ. Anyone who distorts the Gospel Message of Jesus teaches the Oppisite. Muhammad taught the Oppisite amd distorts the Gospel Message of Jesus!

    • @keemo9204
      @keemo9204 2 місяці тому

      @@rc6289muslims also believe jesus is the messiah, we just dont believe hes god.

    • @rc6289
      @rc6289 2 місяці тому

      @@keemo9204 The Old Testament is the "Foundation" of the Gospel Message of Messiah. And the New Testament is the "Fulfillment" of the Gospel Message of Yeshua Hamashiach.
      Your different 'Isa does not Match the Foundation of who the Messiah is to be.
      Muhammad taught a Failing and False Messiah. Amd Distorted the Gospel Message of the Yeshua Hamashiach, Jesus!

  • @basedbuz
    @basedbuz 5 місяців тому +6

    A video on his you did this would be awesome. Especially between different theologians

  • @SgtTeddybear66
    @SgtTeddybear66 5 місяців тому +10

    The name YHWH is the answer; In ancient hebrew, Each letter had a meaning. YHWH when read from left to right says "Behold Nail, Behold Hand"
    God told Abraham that he would be pierced by a Nail through the Hand. Period - This trumps any debate. Jesus is God.

    • @deborahsmith5285
      @deborahsmith5285 5 місяців тому

      Well, you started off right and strong with YHWH (YaHaWaH). Behold the hand and behold the nail.
      Now, how you go and say something like Jesus is God.
      It's a good idea to know the Son's name too. It's Yahawashi not Jesus.

    • @lovesandservesjesuschrist6752
      @lovesandservesjesuschrist6752 4 місяці тому

      @@deborahsmith5285 *It's Yahawashi not Jesus.*
      Correction!: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_(name)

    • @shajidrahaman
      @shajidrahaman 3 місяці тому

      So basically what you're saying is "my book says jesus is god so even though your book doesnt, my book is the real book" (you dont have any proof for this btw) "and so jesus IS real. AMEN!!!!"

  • @matrixlife3512
    @matrixlife3512 4 місяці тому +35

    A major shortcoming of this method is the AI does not account for how reliable the text is based on a chain of custody back to the source. As such apocrypha text written by men is treated at the same level of trust as a watertight accurate transmission through well-known sources

    • @matrixlife3512
      @matrixlife3512 4 місяці тому +9

      The judge AI should be aware of source grading. So it doesn't just assign points just based on words being spoken. But based on whether the evidence cited is reliable as well. AI is better suited to analyze the full body of knowledge... Including what exists in earliest manuscripts and what has been added to later manuscripts

    • @mitchclinton4452
      @mitchclinton4452 4 місяці тому

      Kinda like your one dimensional comment biased and a trite vision of despair and doubt so views as yours especially look for fault cause you are that.

    • @jesaispas6402
      @jesaispas6402 3 місяці тому +1

      Another major shortcoming is that this is an LLM. It's just for entertainment purposes, an LLM is not able to do philosophy or theology. But it's entertaining. Granted people do the same in real life, they debate over worthless technical details of the text for entertainment. It doesn't actually matter if Jesus walked on water or not or what exact word Muhammad used. What matters is that you love your neighbors, you forgive, you don't kill, you are honest, you have respect for others, you help the poors, you don't lie and so on. Some people confuse the messenger with the message. The wise man shows the moon and the fool watches his finger. Those who debate the details of the text, whether you should eat pork or not but don't love, kill or don't respect others are fools. The wise people understand the message and what is important in it and they act accordingly. Both books tell the same thing in different terms. Both christians and muslims follow the same god.

    • @Hannestv4607
      @Hannestv4607 3 місяці тому

      *What your imams don't tell you*
      Son of God does not mean that God has a child in Christianity!
      *this is a mistake in the Qur'an!*

    • @Hannestv4607
      @Hannestv4607 3 місяці тому

      *What your imams don't tell you*
      Allah himself testifies that he has a son and he is the son as Christians understand it! Only the Koran writer was too ignorant to know what Son of God means! Allah's word which created everything is Allah himself too! *The Word Allahs which created everything is the Son of God according to Christianity!*

  • @mrgopnik5964
    @mrgopnik5964 Місяць тому

    This is what debates are supposed to look like. Notice how not even once they have strained from the topic to go for personal attacks

    • @denimmybos9740
      @denimmybos9740 Місяць тому

      this is not real AI, ask Chat GPT 4o for more real data. He used offline AI model whose data we can add and change according to our own perspective. which is definitely not objective. You can also make it in the LM studio application.

  • @dksangrmarak3208
    @dksangrmarak3208 4 місяці тому +13

    "Who ever does a wrong or wrongs himself but then seeks forgiveness of Allah will find Allah forgiving and merciful" . . . This is a very stong words . . . People do wrong then ask for forgiveness

    • @michaelcorke7302
      @michaelcorke7302 3 місяці тому +5

      Jesus forgives, the Christian god forgives, alot more peace and love in the bible by a long shot. No your Allah is a deciever.

    • @hasyrafhasnizan1357
      @hasyrafhasnizan1357 3 місяці тому

      Watch your mouth, if you really understand your bible, the Father mentioned also name Allah. You just insult your God​@@michaelcorke7302

    • @ferasm96
      @ferasm96 3 місяці тому +1

      Asking for forgiveness is translation of "توبة" which means in arabic that you regret your action and then have the true intention to not repeat that again!
      Don't only rely on translation because they can be misleading when you translate 1 to 1

    • @dksangrmarak3208
      @dksangrmarak3208 3 місяці тому

      @@michaelcorke7302 who told you i'm muslim m Christian

    • @michaelcorke7302
      @michaelcorke7302 3 місяці тому

      @@dksangrmarak3208 Allah is the demon Muslims worship, don't call the one true God of Christianity Allah it's yhwh not the name of the pagan arabs moon god Allah.

  • @kazuha74
    @kazuha74 4 місяці тому +4

    awesome video! So cool to see Ai put to good use 😊

  • @gavinjames1145
    @gavinjames1145 5 місяців тому +14

    Considering that the Qur'an is mostly based on Judeo-Christian sources, and a syncretism thereof, which affirms Jesus's virgin birth and status of Messiah, as being a prophet and Word of God, of having healed and performed miracles, was taken up to be with God, and will return to judge the world (but _apparently_ denying his death by crucifixion and being the Son of God), it should be no surprise that the Christian AI should have the small advantage over the Muslim AI.

    • @makeytgreatagain6256
      @makeytgreatagain6256 5 місяців тому +4

      If the Christian AI used the Quran it would have easily been an 100 point lead for Christian AI. The Quran makes statements that are contradictory and a historical like the death of Jesus. The Quran also states Allahs word cannot be altered destroying the “courruption” of the bible and Torah false. As I said the Muslim AI unironically had the best advantage it could have been given….

    • @gavinjames1145
      @gavinjames1145 5 місяців тому +3

      @@makeytgreatagain6256 I agree 100%.
      The Muslim AI could also pick faults with the Old and New Testaments; especially as it seems to me that it was fully aware of the Dawah script.
      Like you, I was continually picking fault with the Muslim AI, which seemed to give very surface-level answers.

    • @makeytgreatagain6256
      @makeytgreatagain6256 5 місяців тому

      @@gavinjames1145 Yes i agree with you but the "Faults" within the Old testement also apply to the Quran so those arguments get destroyed infact the OT actually confirms the NT concept of the Trinity. The only negative things Muslims could say about the OT is some of the less PG 12 rated events like the genoices and wars/punishments for the Moasaic law. But christians dont follow Moasaic law which is why i dont know why muslim use these examples as it doesnt invalidate our faith i guess they use it to justiy Islams barbaric doctrines i suppose lol.
      I debate muslims a lot myself but im ceartain if they allowed the AI to grab from the Quran and OT then im sure the difference would be a score of at least 100 in favour of christianity tbh

    • @ebcsecurity9490
      @ebcsecurity9490 5 місяців тому

      How Christians bet their souls on an unpreserved book with unknown authors and interpolated text even their highest scholars admit to is beyond amazingly arrogant pride. If that same standard was used as evidence against any of them in the court of law for any criminal prosecution, they would cry the court system is unjust and corrupt LMAO. The irony is the hereafter is a bigger prison than they would face here on earth lol.

    • @ebcsecurity9490
      @ebcsecurity9490 5 місяців тому

      Here are names of Gods throughout history that are said to have died and resurrected.
      OSIRIS
      An Egyptian, Ethiopian, Sudanese God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 5,000 YEARS before Jesus.
      HORUS
      An Egyptian, Ethiopian, Sudanese God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 3,000 YEARS before Jesus.
      BUDDHA
      An Indian God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 600 YEARS before Jesus.
      KRISHNA
      An Indian God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 900 YEARS before Jesus..
      ZARATHUSTRA
      An Iranian God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 1,000 YEARS before Jesus.
      HERCULES
      A Greek God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 800 YEARS before Jesus.
      MITHRA
      An Iranian God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 600 YEARS before Jesus.
      DIONYSUS
      A Greek God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 500 YEARS before Jesus..
      THAMMUZ
      A Babylonian God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 2,000 YEARS before Jesus.
      HERMES
      A Greek God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 200 YEARS before Jesus.
      ADONIS
      A Phoenician God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 200 YEARS before Jesus.
      JESUS CHRIST
      A Roman God. He was said to have been crucified, he died and resurrected 1-30 AD.

  • @umersdiary2.0
    @umersdiary2.0 2 місяці тому +2

    one Quran fighting with dozens of christian books . that should be enough to prove

  • @josephascroft4774
    @josephascroft4774 5 місяців тому +5

    Is it not also very interesting that when the guards came to arrest Him and He asked who they were looking for, He answered “I Am He” and we are told that the guards fell down or stepped back as if in awe and fear, does this not give us a glimpse of Jesus divinity and the fact that He was freely giving Himself as a sacrifice

  • @enriqueicm7341
    @enriqueicm7341 5 місяців тому +7

    Really great video! Thanks a lot!

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +1

      appreciated, thanks for the note... consider subscribing if you want to see more. :)

  • @levirichards7010
    @levirichards7010 5 місяців тому +22

    As an atheist I think it would be cool to have an Atheist vs Christian or even an Atheist vs Muslim AI debate like this.

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +9

      working on a theist v atheist debate... hopefully uploading later this week.

    • @raulmartinez429
      @raulmartinez429 5 місяців тому

      There could never be atheist AI because they are intelligent and full of information which is exactly why atheist lack of 🤣🤣

    • @St0rmXG46
      @St0rmXG46 4 місяці тому

      Thats actually an interesting idea i want to see a hindu ai vs a christin or athiest ai

    • @brenthume5445
      @brenthume5445 4 місяці тому +3

      The Muslim AIs clearly don’t understand the trinity.

    • @GutsOnYT
      @GutsOnYT 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@brenthume5445right.

  • @GBNTGroup
    @GBNTGroup 3 місяці тому

    It would be interesting to see what AI says about Universalism.

  • @HelovesU-we4qh
    @HelovesU-we4qh 5 місяців тому +6

    Wow! That was incredible! I didn't not expect to find much when I clicked on this video. I only clicked out of curiosity,. I love the format, I love the way the questions were answered directly, and with scripture as opposed to all of the ridiculous back and forth that you usually get in these debates. There is no condensation, no reduction to name calling or accusations. I can't believe it but I loved this!

    • @JonOleksiuk
      @JonOleksiuk  5 місяців тому +1

      @HelovesU-we4qh thanks for the note. i had a similar reaction as i watched it play out in real time.

    • @BornAgain223
      @BornAgain223 5 місяців тому +1

      the muslim AI actually did have some better arguments than typical Muslims do on youtube videos, so I'll give them credit for that. However, they used bible verses to disprove the divinity of Jesus which were logically inconsistent with other verses in the bible.. It's not possible to affirm bible verses and at the same time deny others.

    • @BornAgain223
      @BornAgain223 5 місяців тому

      ​@JonOleksiuk very interesting experiment though! kudos to you for doing this, I'm sure it can be tweaked to get much more advanced and nuanced debates from the AI.

    • @BornAgain223
      @BornAgain223 5 місяців тому

      the muslim AI was however using taqqiya when it came to the Bible's preservation and what the qu'aran says about it.