Early Medieval Philosophy: Augustine of Hippo and Boethius
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 вер 2023
- With ancient philosophy covered, it's time to move into medieval philosophy. This era is dominated by a strong link with theology, and all the most significant contributors to philosophy in this era were largely commenting on religious doctrine. But figures like Aristotle still had a strong influence on these thinkers, so let's see what sort of progress was made during these centuries.
Script by Luca Igansi
Watch the whole Philosophy/Logic playlist: bit.ly/ProfDavePhilo
Psychology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePsych
Mathematics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveMath
General Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveGenChem
Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveOrgChem
Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBiochem
Biology/Genetics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
Anatomy & Physiology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveAnatPhys
Biopsychology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBiopsych
Pharmacology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDavePharma
History of Drugs Videos: bit.ly/ProfDaveHistoryDrugs
Geology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveGeo
EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
PATREON► / professordaveexplains
Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT
The frequency and quality of your videos is astonishing, you are an academic powerhouse. Thank you for continuously carrying my GPA throughout my undergraduate studies!
I love this philosophy series. I had philosophy in university and it's really cool to brush up on this knowledge. Especially that this course is very different from my university course.
I wish Dave would do a video on Tyler Henry the Hollywood medium. This guy claims to speak with the dead while giving a texted book example of cold reading. He has made a fortune off peoples misfortunes, that is being a criminal in one the worst ways possible.
Dave reads almost every comment in his comment sections, especially if you comment early on a new video. He probably read your comment. I'm sorry this "Tyler Henry" guy is bilking folks. I don't know if Dave is aware of Tyler or if Dave has already spoken on Tyler Henry. I would be interested in hearing from Dave about any con artist. Thank you.
it's low hanging fruit but it's entertaining to watch dave debunk the supernatural con people
Fantastic summary, hello from Peru
Now , you are not getting what you deserve . But keep up the good work . Best wishes
Have you thought about making a series on using computational chemistry software like GAMESS and Gaussian?
I wish you could do a bit of longer toutorial to biogensis, showing old former attempts about solving the origin od life issue.
I am acquainted with publications of Adam Rutherford, I loved his show The Cell, also I am acquainted with Jacks Szostak work, as well as Nick Lane, David Deamer. I think you could make an educational series about this topic that could clarify the science approach and make many people doubt the religious fraud
Dear Dave how's it going. I am a very big fan of learning languages. I have been searching online for Italian courses and I think yours is one of the best. That's why I have downloaded the whole playlist. but I have one one question;
Are all the videos inside your playlist put in the correct order from the first to the last or they are put randomly????????
it really matters for me thank you so much
they are in order, please view on youtube when possible, if you download i don't get the views
@@ProfessorDaveExplainsLooking for views lol , let's just learn
@@SABA.17 this channel is how I support my family. Stop encouraging people to undermine creator culture.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains 🍑💪🏻
Very interesting
Hells yeah!!! Love ancient philosophy and science.
Yo Dave. Now I know that you know this but still. James tour decided to do another of his stunt and made a video challenging the origin of life researchers to answer his questions . Any comment on that?
Dave is probably gonna ignore James's flailing about the debate unless he makes another series of cartoons about how goofy Dave doesn't know chemistry
Barely worth even acknowledging but I might to a short one to make fun of him some more.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains that's always a good idea
@@ProfessorDaveExplains, professor Dave, your explanations are really eye opening in this video. It answered the question:
If today is 2023 A.D. then what happened all those years ago?
@@nikhilrodrigues8475 Educated people say CE, kiddo. Common era. Year 1 is arbitrary.
On John Scotus' name: Ireland itself was called Scotia back then... (or in the Medieval period "Scotia Major", to distinguish it from Scotia Minor, i.e. modern Scotland). Basically he was Irish, not Scottish.
From helping me with tests to arguing with flat earthers to philosophy Dave is one of a kind🤣🤣
Ah men, I love Boetius and Augustine, it is soo fascinating!! Not super relevant, but I still love it the way I love how Tolkien philosophizes about his secondary world :)
From _Confessions_ At ego adulescens miser ualde, miser in exordio ipsius adulescentiae, etiam petieram a te castitatem et dixeram, 'Da mihi castitatem et continentiam, sed noli modo.'
8:50 EEEE that's Averroes. Córdoba rules babyyy
He's not the Jesus anymore guys
He's professor Dave
Ontolicious
Thank you jesus
thank you sir mr. jesus
Hey Wael
Ah yes! As i imagined 😊
One more thing, i noticed a "translate to english" option to the comment "hey wael" (which is weird) and weird enough it translated to Hey Bad 😅
I didn't know that my name can be translated in any language let alone to English with some intresting findings 😂
I wonder if your channel ended up in a list for saying islamic state 😅
Hey u gained a new subscriber from india . In india people don't know about the great minds like s chabdrasekhar , cb raman but know about the pseudoscientist . What about debunking this claims
"science progresses and philosophy doesn’t" Lawrence Krauss
Both must progress together it’s not p and not p.
Meanwhile science is a combination of philosophies. This Ignorance is almost religious
It doesn't need to progress Lil bro.
Because philosophy doesn’t work the same way as science
Jesus Christ, those bible people should have left you alone 😂
Are you the guy that got exposed by Tour? hahaha
No I'm the guy that exposed Tour. Nervous laughter doesn't change reality, sweetie.
You aren't in James Tour's league pal.
@@swansonz3534 Um, yeah. I'm not a lying apologist fraud. I'm a science communicator who actually explains science. Glad you can admit that James is a fraud, sweetie.
@@swansonz3534 Funny how you begged people to not watch the recap video on James exposing his lies. Maybe you can explain why sulfur isn't natural or reagents aren't part of science?
It is worth noting that *whenever you study a philosopher who is religious, who is talking about anything to do with their religion/theology, they are not doing philosophy, they are doing apologetics. These are not the same.*
Philosophy is honest enquiring and truth-seeking, apologetics is making excuses or a defense for what they already assume without reason, to be true.
I think that applies to contemporary philosophy but I don’t it’s fair to say that of more ancient eras.
No, because religious beliefs were part of how people understood the natural world. You’re applying a post-enlightenment mentality to pre-enlightenment people.
@@JohnD808 You can't know what they were thinking. It is naive and patronising to the people of the past to think they all didn't/couldn't know better so must have been convinced of the religion they were surrounded by.
You can however, make the argument that their material circumstances were contingent on their publically advocating for/defending the religion of the day because well, we know what would happen if they didn't...
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Well, I think its worth acknowledging that their material circumstances, livelyhoods and even lives were contingent on their continued presentation of being believers no matter the era. Especially in times and places where they could be uh 'dealt with' if they questioned the religion of the day which was often synonomous with the powerful/elites.
Perhaps today there's more "i know this isn't true but I'm gonna say it is anyway" but in the past, I'm sure there was far more "I don't think this is true but I may as well write about/defend it because they'll get me" than we like to admit. Also, they probably enjoyed being considered smart or something for their day.
@@satyasyasatyasya5746 You’re just spouting anachronistic antitheist claptrap. You’re the one presuming that what they think isn’t what they tell us but the result of this made-up narrative that pits these people as victims of religious intolerance. You should probably educate yourself on stoicism and Neoplatonism because, guess what, they are “religious” as well. You’re essentially arguing philosophy didn’t exist until around the enlightenment. It’s absurd.
Augustin of Hippo is probably the worst thing that happened to humanity. His philosophy is the theoretical base for the theocracy in the dark ages.
Explain yourself. What for example? Too superficial.
"humanity" you mean what? A certain amount of people around mediterrain? And which aspects of this "theorical base" you infer?
God bless you Professor Dave.
You should listen to the interpretation of this text by the cumtown podcast Professor Dave. It's a fascinating exploration of the themes in the original text.
What an interesting podcast name
@@ZalamaTheDragonGodIndeed, it is.
You surely would have noticed that even the title is a scathing criticism of our postmodern world.
Truly a great work of art.
Tyrex ate GIANT Carrots ? Were did this Happen...? There is NO War Kent.....Get a grip..... So after some Adam Dude ate this SPECAL Fruit...Rapid Micro EVOLUTION to place...Cheetahs Hunted Gezelle ...Lions Ate Zebras .... Sharks ate seals....Crocodiles ate logs ? ..That was when Kent's World was Perfect.........Then Man Changed the entire Eco System......By eating that Magical Fruit........Right KENT ?...