Hoi 4 - Paradox "Patched" Rushing Anschluss: Paradox Development in a Nutshell

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • I swear does paradox even test their own games or are they seriously just that bad at them that they don't realize that people can just modify the current exploit to circumvent (I know I said circumnavigate in the video, sue me) the fix to the exploit. Like it took me maybe 5 seconds to figure out how to get around their "fix".
    Patch Notes: forum.paradoxp...
    I stream sometimes, maybe, if I feel like I have enough time to finish that specific game: Twitch.tv/71Cloak

КОМЕНТАРІ • 170

  • @craig5322
    @craig5322 Рік тому +445

    I love how you expose these problems. It's funny how some of the core game mechanics remain broken for years just because someone wrote 2 instead of 0.5.

    • @mikke_213
      @mikke_213 Рік тому +2

      what do you mean?

    • @Coecoo
      @Coecoo Рік тому +35

      Things are broken for years because Paradox is a company who is thoroughly and utterly incompetent & irreparably greedy.

    • @craig5322
      @craig5322 Рік тому +17

      @@mikke_213 I'm referring to the part about naval combat. All this time there was a 2 where there was supposed to be a 0.5 in part of the code, which made ships dodge hits 4 times more than they were supposed to

    • @LightgreenLP
      @LightgreenLP Рік тому +6

      @@craig5322 He said that bug has been in the game since 1.12 which came out like half a year ago why do you call it "broken for years"?

    • @mikke_213
      @mikke_213 Рік тому

      @@craig5322 oh

  • @Nota-Skaven
    @Nota-Skaven Рік тому +243

    I think even PDX forgot you could restrict equipment to a division

    • @K0NG
      @K0NG Рік тому +20

      2500 hours and this is the first time i've seen it

    • @GrandSnow469
      @GrandSnow469 Рік тому +18

      @@K0NG I used it in OWB mod, so my shitty militia divisions wouldn't get expensive advanced Gauss weapons and only the pipe guns xd. I can agree it's pretty useless in vanilla

    • @999mi999
      @999mi999 Рік тому +6

      @@GrandSnow469 I use it in vanilla to distinguish between tanks for infantry divisions and tanks for the tank divisions.

    • @GrandSnow469
      @GrandSnow469 Рік тому +1

      @@999mi999 What's the point though. Light tanks are as expensive as mediums and have a lot less stats. Which is precicely why you can only puth lights as infantry support.

    • @БодяДробовик
      @БодяДробовик Рік тому +2

      @@GrandSnow469 Kinda make supercheap medium bricks with nothing but skirts, wealded armor, small 1man turret and as much steel in armor as you can, if its late enough and enemy uses armored tanks, you can put at-piercing gun in this to save div org for price of industrial capacity, otherwise go with heavy machinegun, its a gud backbone for expensive backbone divisions(1 per tile) that should keep tile, provide aa for tile batte, provide penetration to remove armor bonus from enemies tanks, and maybe provie maintenance team to collect all the stuff from batles, supersolid for medium+ sized countries in sp, can even work in mp in certain situation. Also adding of exavation to tanks, makes almost any designs(recon-at on wheels, just at,light-flamethrowers on wheels, medium-bricks) more than costeficient for defensive use in inf.

  • @hatless_spider
    @hatless_spider Рік тому +115

    If PDX watches this, they will still change it before the beta patch is actually live now 😅😂

    • @rikai5344
      @rikai5344 Рік тому +7

      I dont think they will. What is in the beta patch is usually final. I would bet money on this.

  • @kalimatronix
    @kalimatronix Рік тому +67

    3:24 That reminds me how in the recent Stellaris update they wanted to make the near-FTL primitive civilisations have a 5% chance to commit a Nuclear Annihilation each year, but instead made it to be a 5% chance each month.

  • @WateryChorus
    @WateryChorus Рік тому +66

    Removing thats stockpile requirement can easily fix the exploit. If they want us to do the focus in 1937, the requirement should only be after 1937 time date. Anyway, thanks for the explanation for the rest of the update contents.

    • @konbkob4156
      @konbkob4156 Рік тому

      Or have it so that Austria fights back before 1936, or that everyone embargos you killing your run, or literally anything other than a quick bandaid fix

  • @UCKszbcV
    @UCKszbcV Рік тому +29

    Looking forward to the discussion of the change in the navy meta

    • @alexionut.05
      @alexionut.05 Рік тому +2

      I presume naval batteries will actually be useful now, carriers will still be op but not the only ones that matter now. Also it will now probably be worth sacrificing speed for heavier batteries, or taking say Atlantic Designer over Raiding Fleet Designer

    • @themensnart7690
      @themensnart7690 Рік тому

      @@alexionut.05 I noticed yesterday that you can no longer combine light and medium batteries on cruisers.... since when is it like that?

  • @vin55100
    @vin55100 Рік тому +98

    I love how paradox fixes something no one had a problem with in single player^^

    • @secondaccount1082
      @secondaccount1082 Рік тому +2

      multiplayer exists, nobody gives a fuck about singleplayer

    • @xenosfur
      @xenosfur Рік тому +53

      @@secondaccount1082 multiplayer has rulesets for a reason, the game can never satisfy every multiplayer ruleset and shouldn't aim to. Its a WW2 sim. and singleplayer rocks

    • @vin55100
      @vin55100 Рік тому +22

      @@secondaccount1082 I am playing mostly mp but well sp is the bigger community in hoi

    • @guntherdoesaliltrolling5757
      @guntherdoesaliltrolling5757 Рік тому +13

      ​@@secondaccount1082 Is this a late april fools joke. 🤨

    • @PinguiniAlfredo
      @PinguiniAlfredo Рік тому +1

      @@secondaccount1082 touch grass

  • @siskinedge
    @siskinedge Рік тому +28

    I think they increased accident chance so they could increase training speed so it's more worthwhile to train planes as it's faster and costs less fuel.

    • @javierperalta7648
      @javierperalta7648 Рік тому +6

      I thought it was always worthwhile to train planes since during peace time you are not even using fuel

  • @LJKGray
    @LJKGray Рік тому +15

    Transport plane ever since NSB went from overpower to complete worthless in a single patch, happy to see it got buffed eventhough it isn't much. Also what with this Anschluss exploit anyway. I always delay taking Austria as long as possible so they can give me more factory

    • @shadere2434
      @shadere2434 Рік тому

      You want to take as much land as possible earlier so YOU can take advantage of building as much as possible.
      Hoi4 is a game of logisitcs and the faster you can build up the more successful you will be.

    • @stormsand9
      @stormsand9 Рік тому

      Before BBA or NSP I swear Austria was scripted to finish construction effort 3 (the final civ one that gives 2 civs) on the same day as the Anschluss, thus giving a Germany who waits more factories for waiting, but then at some point Austria now just does it randomly...

  • @marthvader14
    @marthvader14 Рік тому +42

    Do you play other games too which you would be interested in making videos about? Love your explanations

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому +32

      I've been playing a lot of Rimworld recently, but I wouldn't say I'm that good at it. I definitely save scum anytime a pawn dies for a bs reason.

    • @marcocorrente2115
      @marcocorrente2115 Рік тому +12

      @@71Cloak We all have attachment issues when playing rimworld haha

    • @Brigtzen
      @Brigtzen Рік тому

      @@71Cloak Hey, Rimworld would be great! I'm about 900h in and i too would't consider myself good, and save scumming is just a part of the game for me. In fact, one of the biggest rimworld youtubers ambigous amphibioun only had like 800 hours on a semi-recent vid!
      Basically, you dont really need ro know much about it. Even if you only have 10 hours. Trust me, the communtiy is quite starved for content.

    • @catrielmarignaclionti4518
      @catrielmarignaclionti4518 Рік тому

      @@71Cloak oh could you make videos about that? i was looking foward to playing it but without knowing anything about that game id rather learn from you

  • @---ii8hl
    @---ii8hl Рік тому +5

    this is such a godsend for modders.

  • @andrewthebandit0223
    @andrewthebandit0223 Рік тому

    welcome back man missed your videos

  • @Helmet_Von_Moldy
    @Helmet_Von_Moldy Рік тому +5

    Watching the air XP part, after 18 days of training you lost 5 naval bombers. That’s kind of a lot imo.

  • @serga2003
    @serga2003 Рік тому +6

    I guess, by "Air wing XP gain increased" they mean wing XP(skilled crew), not Air XP.

  • @tson1111
    @tson1111 Рік тому +9

    I do this exploit anyways before the patch but paradox should understand anchluss just like most things can be countered easily by the allies because it means UK gets -5% consumer goods and fighter 2s early and soviets get war support for war eco without attache so early anchluss isn't even OP

    • @Nick02111989
      @Nick02111989 Рік тому

      what even is the advantage of doing anchluss early ?

    • @tson1111
      @tson1111 Рік тому

      @@Nick02111989 pp + war support to rush war eco and u get Austrian eco early

  • @erikrodrigues2733
    @erikrodrigues2733 Рік тому +1

    First, welcome back! We missed you
    Second, if you want to make videos about other games, I think a lot of people would watch.
    Third, if you need suggestions about what to do video wise, what about anti-patrol task force (A task force designed to delete other patrols before strike forces appears)?

    • @erikrodrigues2733
      @erikrodrigues2733 Рік тому

      @TruckerDave650 it's not about winning, it's about winning fast enough. AI can't really handle anti-patrol TFs

  • @brucesim2003
    @brucesim2003 Рік тому

    P'dox trying to squash badwrongfun. Now there's a surprise.

  • @ass4sale2
    @ass4sale2 Рік тому +5

    Only way to increase reliability for planes is by medium designer. Gives 20% to medium frame. I'm pretty sure that is the only way.

    • @nycdotnet4751
      @nycdotnet4751 Рік тому +2

      some leaders have air accident chance modifier too like Italo Balbo for Italy.

  • @CarvaxIV
    @CarvaxIV Рік тому +14

    I want to love transport planes. I really do, especially when dealing with Russia, Africa, and Asia.
    Could you do some testing to see if it really works?

    • @brexit_good9604
      @brexit_good9604 Рік тому +2

      wdym you love transport planes? they give 0.2 supply in the live patch and cost 20 command power to use 100 command power for 1 supply is not good

    • @antosqa7343
      @antosqa7343 Рік тому +8

      ​@@brexit_good9604Well I think because he love using them he would like for them to work properly? I too am annoyed when you're fighting in the depth of Russia or China and your supply is non existent. Also if PDX include the plane design for transport planes will be very appreciated. Their range is smth I would like to increase

    • @youtuberobbedmeofmyname
      @youtuberobbedmeofmyname Рік тому +2

      @@antosqa7343 We need to be able to upgrade them.

    • @honeybadger6275
      @honeybadger6275 Рік тому

      @@antosqa7343 Why even have them in the game if they're going to be tits on a bull useless? I swear the more they "update" this game the less fun it gets.

    • @apoivre
      @apoivre Рік тому

      @@brexit_good9604 0.2 supply in the live patch and 1 supply in the beta, if the patch notes are anything to go by.

  • @VarenvelDarakus
    @VarenvelDarakus Рік тому +6

    you can change reliability(not directly) , but there are command people who recude it , and spirit of airforce also has something for it , l , there are also designers who do it , and specific country focuses , and special "country" designers as well

  • @markregev1651
    @markregev1651 Рік тому +9

    Are you playing any other games for which you could post number crunching videos

  • @thomynator6002
    @thomynator6002 Рік тому +1

    Hess back!!!!!

  • @nikmurano8013
    @nikmurano8013 Рік тому

    He’s back! Yes!

  • @CatnamedMittens
    @CatnamedMittens Рік тому

    You make the best HOI4 vids

  • @ИльяРихтер
    @ИльяРихтер Рік тому

    Он вернулся!

  • @SouthParkCows88
    @SouthParkCows88 Рік тому +1

    I don't like how you need so many damn transport planes to drop paratroopers, I enjoy using them but my goodness the amount of planes needed.

    • @SouthParkCows88
      @SouthParkCows88 Рік тому

      @TruckerDave650 I just drop them in batches of 6 divs separate orders as well. Still annoying, idk why they changed it.

  • @UCKszbcV
    @UCKszbcV Рік тому

    Good to have you back

  • @PadaV4
    @PadaV4 Рік тому +10

    Yeah, but at this point how could they possibly fix the Anschluss exploit without making the focus requirements extremely long and complicated?

    • @qu3stionm4rk
      @qu3stionm4rk Рік тому +4

      just make requirements on strength of divisions in army

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому +3

      They can definitely add a check for how much equipment you have in the divisions and if its below a certain percent you can't do the focus. There are definitely mods that do that.

    • @999mi999
      @999mi999 Рік тому +3

      I don't understand why it needs to be "fixed". In singleplayer, most players will go the usual route; minmaxxers WILL find a way to circumvent the fix since they were the only one's using the exploit anyway; and it's banned in multiplayer anyway. It hurt no one.

    • @haukikannel
      @haukikannel Рік тому

      @@999mi999
      It is exploit so why not remedy it if possible…

    • @Nick02111989
      @Nick02111989 Рік тому

      @@haukikannel what is the exploit here? i'm curious, as this is the first i'd heard of it?

  • @youtuberobbedmeofmyname
    @youtuberobbedmeofmyname Рік тому +1

    It really doesn't hurt actually.
    Even if you were forced to, you could just wait 210-280 days for Austria to get more factories, then do it.

  • @Man_of_Various_Cultures
    @Man_of_Various_Cultures Рік тому

    I always wondered why my beefed out, modern Italian fleet would do fuck all damage to the British.

  • @F.R.E.D.D2986
    @F.R.E.D.D2986 Рік тому

    I never knew you could do this, I just rush deployed divisions

  • @Bruh-ff2tw
    @Bruh-ff2tw Рік тому +2

    New naval analysis? A lot of people have been saying that heavy attack is better now.

  • @sahilhossian8212
    @sahilhossian8212 Рік тому +2

    Lore of Hoi 4 - Paradox "Patched" Rushing Anschluss: Paradox Development in a Nutshell momentum 100

  • @mushroomy9899
    @mushroomy9899 Рік тому

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MY FUCKING STRATEGY. DAMN IT. I can still rush poland for the civil war and rush the indies for rubber but like AGHHHRRRHHSHSHHSHSH

  • @anthemsofeurope2408
    @anthemsofeurope2408 Рік тому +1

    In all of my games, germany dont annex austria, because they have to few manpower. In every game...

  • @H3rraM4juri
    @H3rraM4juri Рік тому

    i think what they should do that you don't rush it is that your division need to have at least 30 or 40% or the equimpent or make that you need to wait at least to 1937

  • @SkinkUA
    @SkinkUA Рік тому +1

    Oh, I thought you're done

  • @giahungnguyen6334
    @giahungnguyen6334 Рік тому

    Well they can change the requirement to “all field divs are properly equipped”

  • @janekk8833
    @janekk8833 Рік тому +2

    Is soviet spirit debuffing air force still not working? Like I remember at some point it didn't apply to your planes and i was lately wondering if they've patched it

  • @edwardsazonov1034
    @edwardsazonov1034 Рік тому

    I may be wrong, but I think Air XP gain stayed the same, rather Air WING XP gain is increased i.e. you can train fighters to lvl 3 a bit faster

  • @omegawonton8749
    @omegawonton8749 Рік тому +1

    why would you want to rush anschluss though? to my understanding you want to let the austrian ai do its industry focuses so you get more factories

  • @TheoHawk316
    @TheoHawk316 Рік тому

    I don't normally get Anschluss until about 1938 cuz I focus on industry and military then political.

  • @tobers_j
    @tobers_j Рік тому +1

    If you don’t want to make hoi4 videos, I’d leave to see your analysis of other games!

  • @alexanderholt4679
    @alexanderholt4679 Рік тому

    why make it so complicated? convert all inf to horses train up another 20 horses rapid deploy and convert all 50 is horsesto mot with no equipment enabled
    will get you all you need

  • @porterbennett7041
    @porterbennett7041 Рік тому

    Um training you should always train your airforce before sending them to fight the enemy 15% agil and attack is huge its can litaraly the difrence between having green air or dying to then enemy

  • @xdeepxfreezex2621
    @xdeepxfreezex2621 Рік тому +4

    Does the Zero Focus for Japan still give the old plane designer where you can max out its reliability? If so does that still circumvent the air accident chance? The Zero from the focus still had better stats than the researchable and designable fighters which was hilarious to me

    • @kinmersha
      @kinmersha Рік тому +2

      nah it has poor attack and defense compared to a proper 1940 fighter. The bonkers part is it was super cheap compared to a good plane, so as long as you have the fuel you could just swarm them

    • @xdeepxfreezex2621
      @xdeepxfreezex2621 Рік тому +1

      @@kinmersha Oh no, youre correct. They finally updated the focus so it actually uses the new system. The zero is terrible

    • @XmXStuka2
      @XmXStuka2 Рік тому +2

      Yeah but you can still rush 1940 plane and edit it with designer to be better or make new zero thats meta

    • @ass4sale2
      @ass4sale2 Рік тому +1

      @@kinmersha the point of rushing the zero was you had a 1940 carrier plane in 37. It's not terrible. It has drop tanks and cannons. Sure it's not ideal because it has no self sealing or engine 3.

    • @drunkenhobo8020
      @drunkenhobo8020 Рік тому +1

      But isn't that focus exclusive with getting the Yamato-class superheavy battleships? Why would anyone pick little planes over giant boat?

  • @FulmenTheFinn
    @FulmenTheFinn Рік тому

    This was also my first reaction when I read what the patch note in the log actually did (since they didn't actually specify what it did): just tick equipment off from a template and swap your fielded units to that one. It's mindboggling how PDX devs never seem to think about stuff like this. It's like they don't play the game. They certainly don't play "competitive" MP with people who know what they're doing.

  • @K162-y1b
    @K162-y1b Рік тому

    500 IQ play. Nice one

  • @gaijinmoments
    @gaijinmoments Рік тому

    I always make anschluss late in singleplayer because austria ai gets industry from focus tree

  • @xanthespace5141
    @xanthespace5141 Рік тому

    why would they even nerf Anschluss in the first place

  • @MyNameIsPita
    @MyNameIsPita Рік тому

    i just justify, not even doing rhineland i just bypass it🗿🗿🗿

  • @gabe75001
    @gabe75001 Рік тому +2

    1 supply per tile in an air zone or TOTAL 1 supply in an air zone?

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому +1

      Should be total. Although the tooltip makes it look like per tile.

    • @undefinedbhvr
      @undefinedbhvr Рік тому

      @@71Cloak the current 0.2 was per tile as of some stealth change, so it might be 1 per tile here as well

  • @Sahtoovi
    @Sahtoovi Рік тому +2

    I don't really see the point in preventing people from rushing it. Like in single player germany is already so strong that it doesn't change much and in multiplayer people usually have rules against rushing it. Usually when I play germany I don't even rush it because it's boring but I still like having the option to.

  • @Taylor_slayss
    @Taylor_slayss Рік тому

    I rushed Anschluss 1 hour ago,did it in 1937 but normally I do it in 1936

    • @H3rraM4juri
      @H3rraM4juri Рік тому

      yeah that is why in my friends mp rules anschluss rush is illegal and is punished with ban because it is fucking stupid AND annoying when people do it

    • @Taylor_slayss
      @Taylor_slayss Рік тому

      @@H3rraM4juri awww cmon

    • @H3rraM4juri
      @H3rraM4juri Рік тому

      @@Taylor_slayss because rushing it could give germany early easy war against france and uk in like late 1938 which when i saw was powerful when ggood player grmans did it and went through magino so yeah rushing is against the rules at least in my friends games

  • @maxsk9074
    @maxsk9074 Рік тому

    PDX did the laziest fix possible. just do it like BICE mod, there the Army Stength is calculated by batallion type and equipment status. and this actually reflects the thing like its intended 🙄

  • @jessefifa
    @jessefifa Рік тому +3

    Why is Anschluss rush so good?

    • @samcooper8189
      @samcooper8189 Рік тому +5

      Get Austria’s industry early

    • @UCKszbcV
      @UCKszbcV Рік тому +2

      It is not so good in MP, you spike world tension

    • @TMG-Germany
      @TMG-Germany Рік тому +4

      Factories.
      Getting those factories early means you the snowball of your economy is higher.

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому +4

      Faster snowball. The way i did it you should be able to immediately do demand sudetenland afterwards as well. That is a lot of industry right at the beginning of the game. With an attaché to spain or goebbels you can also have war eco by mid to late 36 (depending on pp buy order) which is just a huge boost. You are going to use those civs and mils much more efficiently than austria or the czechs.
      I don't usually do it, but it is very effective if you are trying to rush an early war with the allies.

    • @satch5471
      @satch5471 Рік тому +1

      ​@@71Cloak if you do it right and abuse the division reinforce mechanic you can get all of Yugoslavia after that too

  • @opalzard325
    @opalzard325 Рік тому

    Imma watch this get patched

  • @s0lsticefr4
    @s0lsticefr4 Рік тому

    Can't you increase a plane reliability by using a designer over another one?

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому +1

      Only the heavy fighters/tactical bomber designer has reliability on it. The rest don't. I don't think people really use those anymore.

  • @probower4726
    @probower4726 Рік тому

    Hope you've been taking self care, don't have to play the game if it's no longer entertaining. I'm sure people would be glad to have witnessed what you've already uploaded. Moving on with life is completely fine. Don't force yourself to make videos to upload.

  • @mboer4
    @mboer4 Рік тому +2

    why should paradox try to fix the exploits tho? Most people play single player and using developer resources to try and patch every little exploit that may be used for multiplayer seems a bit silly to me.

    • @haukikannel
      @haukikannel Рік тому

      It is better to remove exploits than leave them.

  • @saladbruh2625
    @saladbruh2625 Рік тому

    people still play germany in hoi4?

  • @Thor.Jorgensen
    @Thor.Jorgensen Рік тому

    Consider playing other games that you enjoy and uploading that to your channel.

  • @4ester709
    @4ester709 Рік тому +1

    why cav?

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому

      You can use the division as a garrison division afterwards so it isn't a waste of xp like doing with an infantry battalion.

  • @mustanaamiotto3812
    @mustanaamiotto3812 Рік тому +1

    You mean beta patch is not finished? No way!

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому

      Most of these beta patches don't seem to change much before going live. Also, in the comments they claimed it made it much harder to rush anschluss which is just completely wrong.

  • @heinzguderian9572
    @heinzguderian9572 Рік тому

    Base game?

  • @kasarlsivaspidesi9750
    @kasarlsivaspidesi9750 Рік тому

    is lend lease exploit patched?

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому

      I think one of the patch notes said it was fixed.

  • @EthanPineapple
    @EthanPineapple Рік тому

    Play Eu4.

  • @nikadmnroot7948
    @nikadmnroot7948 Рік тому

    Is he alive?

  • @Emp16
    @Emp16 Рік тому

    Anschluss rush isnt good anyway

  • @Viljuskar
    @Viljuskar Рік тому

    How much more do you gain from annexing Austria early compared to waiting for them to complete their Industrial focuses?

    • @kirby1225
      @kirby1225 Рік тому +2

      For a super early war it's probs worth it.
      But i would argue not as much for a regular game. (Going to war in '39 or '40

    • @revan6608
      @revan6608 Рік тому

      In a public mp it's better rush it, or a random austro Hungary will try to rush it before you

  • @SomeOofDoof
    @SomeOofDoof Рік тому

    me with a pirated version stuck on v1.12.10:

  • @Cpt_Delikan
    @Cpt_Delikan Рік тому +4

    oh you still alive ?

  • @pletskoo514
    @pletskoo514 Рік тому

    tbf, i find this not so bad since you can actually have a chance playing monarchist hungary in MP now

    • @NARKYCZ
      @NARKYCZ Рік тому +1

      You still cannot? :D He did anschluss in 3 focuses, Hungary can't take Austria faster than 3 focuses. So it literally changes nothing only it makes it a little bit more annoying for German player thats it.

  • @Hypernova559x
    @Hypernova559x Рік тому

    How did you get past the time limit where your not able to do it before 1937

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому

      It's an or statement. Jul 1937 or equipment in stockpile. One of those and 500k manpower in the field. So, it is so completely simple to by pass them might as well not have made the change.

  • @timucintarakc2281
    @timucintarakc2281 Рік тому

    please don't upload videos in 60 fps. the game already runs at 20 fps, there is no point in it.

    • @PadaV4
      @PadaV4 Рік тому

      20 FPS? Are you trying to run it on a potato?

    • @71Cloak
      @71Cloak  Рік тому

      The game is definitely run at 60+ fps. I have a little tracker at the top right.

    • @A_Pro_Fuze
      @A_Pro_Fuze Рік тому

      ​@@PadaV4 at speed 5 the game does not run at 60

    • @timucintarakc2281
      @timucintarakc2281 Рік тому

      @@71Cloak anyway. the point is my internet is slow.

    • @timucintarakc2281
      @timucintarakc2281 Рік тому

      @@truckerdave6503 i recommend you to upload your videos in 10000 fps so no one watches

  • @FreeMan4096
    @FreeMan4096 Рік тому

    I have noticed many people lost interest in this game after BBA.

  • @derbasierte4194
    @derbasierte4194 Рік тому

    Are Heavies in Post-NSB still the meta (in MP)? I think that that might have changed and that you should ignore the armor-stat completely. Meaning that you should use Medium tanks, Riveted Armor and rather focus on cost and offensive stats. Does that mean that Armor-upgrades are useless despite them giving Breakthrough?

    • @derbasierte4194
      @derbasierte4194 Рік тому

      On the other side you would still want a little bit of armor since otherwewise enemy infantry divisions can pierce you.

    • @derbasierte4194
      @derbasierte4194 Рік тому

      @TruckerDave650 Ok thanks. I have a few other questions too:
      What about the other modules? Which ones are considered meta?
      Is it worth to upgrade to Improved Medium Chassis?
      Can it be useful to do heavies instead of mediums in certain cases? Or are Mediums now for every country the meta?
      Which cannon for the mediums? Medium cannon or High velocity?
      And
      What is the optimal Tank division?
      40 combat width?
      7/8 mechs
      1/2 Medium TDs with High velocity cannons
      1/2 Flak-Panzer
      The rest tanks
      Should Motorized Arty/Pak/Flak be used?

    • @derbasierte4194
      @derbasierte4194 Рік тому

      @TruckerDave650 Big thanks. Thats about how I imagined it to be. One last question. If someone would use heavies and makes them pretty strong, but also costly, wouldn’t he be in a better situation than the low IC medium tank player? That would be the same as pre-NSB, because back then you needed Heavies in order to pierce the enemy and to have a chance against enemy heavies.
      And numerical superiority wasn’t that beneficial anymore if you can’t break the enemy.
      Or did this become completely obsolete by being able to make low armoured Mediums which can still pierce those heavies, meaning that the armour of both tanks is irrelevant and in the end it comes down to who has more divisions?
      Are those heavies 100% completely countered by putting two TD-battalions ,which have Advaned High Velocity Cannons and eg. Squeeze Bore Adapters, into your tank division?