"Yusuf climbed his way up the fame ladder by conducting himself like a 15 year old redditor edgelord that attacks Wahabbis like a routine form of daily thikr."🤣🤣😂😂✊✊ That's one of the most savage lines I've ever seen. Using that one against the BIRT A.K.A. AWCON, insha Allah.
Shaykh ul islam Taqiutdeen ibn Taymiyaah rahimallaullah. Ya allah you have made this man a bright star which people with clear hearts can see and some are blinded by his light due to there own biddah and the disease in there hearts. May allah bless ibn taymiyaah. May allah make his grave a part and garden of Paradise jannah and may allah makes us like ibn taymiyaah Rahimaullah
@user-uy8pg4wv4b I remember Yusuf told us not to buy the Madakhil by Imam Ibn Badran, Sheikh Bakr Abu Zayd and Sheikh Abdullah al-Turki which is a combined 6000 pages of research. Let's instead buy his 200 page pamphlet on the 'Foundational Principles of the Hanbali School'.
There isn’t one official curriculum of creedal works that all Ḥanbalī scholars agreed on, although there are various currents within the madhhab. Other works like al-Wāsiṭīyyah, al-Ḥamawīyyah, al-Tadmurīyyah and Sharḥ Ḥadīth al-Nuzūl by Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah were also recorded to have been studied by Ḥanbalīs historically.
all the books you list contain the abominable tafwid that the ashairah introduced, stop ascribing to the hanabila and denying the kutub as sunnah like that of imam ahmad's disciples, instead you rely on books from 300 years ago
@@tanzeelfaiz3571 جيد لا مشكلة حبيبي كتب الحنابلة مثل: كتاب السنة للخلال كتاب السنة لحرب كتاب السنة لعبد الله الابانة الكبرى لابن بطة الشرح والابانة لابن بطة كتاب الشريعة لآجري صفة العلو لابن قدامة وغيرها
read his ithbaat sifatul uluww, wherein he even transmits a statement of ibn abdil barr where he transmits an ijma' on how to go about the sifaat, rejecting tafweedhul ma'na. and his refutations on the asharis are well known. are you a pseudo-hanbali?
Does anyone know where i can get a pdf or purchase a copy of the book that Sh As Sa’idi wrote? The one that Sh Ahmad quoted that it’s a very beneficial treatise
As a patron of this channel I’d really like you to rethink your views on sheikh Yusuf. He is legit and has ijazah from many salafi sheukh. His point in addressing the great salafi scholars the way he does is to create a clear distinction between the Rajih approach of the salafi sheukh and the actually Hanbalis. The salafi sheukh are not 100% Hanbali and their opinions are not authorities in the madhab. They are authorities in what is not the Hanbali madhab. That is the only reason he is speaking of the writings the way he is. Even the sheikh at 6:18 acknowledges this. Hence why sheikh Yusuf, taking the traditional Hanbali approach, is denouncing the explanations from sheikh Ibn uthaymeen RA as positions or contributions to the positions of the Hanbali madhab.
You’re presenting the same objection that was addressed in this video. The presence of different opinions within Ḥanbalī fiqh explanations was done by scholars prior to the Wahhābīs. As for those who’d reached the level of ijtihād - like Ibn al-ʿUthaymīn and al-Saʾdī - their tarjīḥ doesn’t remove their efforts from the works of Ḥanbalī fiqh, nor does it make it quote _”one of the worst Ḥanbalī fiqh books.”_ Not to mention that their tarjīḥ mostly was in line with Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah, who himself is a wajh in the madhhab.
@@ibmsulaymanino I don’t even think it’s possible for a book of fiqh to be “bad” or “worse” than anything unless the author was a complete jahil. I think the intention with the statement is it may be a poor representation of the Hanbali madhab because it is not reflective of the ijma’ of the Hanbali ulema.
so could the same or similar thing be said about those Hanbali books of the earlier scholars that Sh Ahmad al Quaymi mentioned that mention other opinions other than the madhab? May Allah bless you akhi
This yusuf is a clown, he has no manners and has a vile tongue and calls people idiots without any reason at all. he aligns himself with the asharis and even condemns ibn taymaiyyah. How on earth can you claim to be a hanbali and say anything bad bout ibn taymiyyah? As for his ijazahs, they dont mean anything on their own, they have to be taken into account with his whole person. Even yasir qadhi had a tazkiyyah from ibn Uthaymeen, doesn't mean its until death
Honestly there is nothing more underwhelming than you children regurgitating buzz words you pick up from the internet. Never has anyone with your childish slogans ever produced a strong argument against us lol. All you do is call us names and throw emojis just like little children. Are you ashari ya zindeeq??
Your Yusuf Ibn Sadiq Al Quburi's teacher at Al Azhar has praised scholars of Najd and Shaikh Uthaymeen.So Al Quburi should first speak ill of his own teacher.😂😂😂😂😂
1:08 - Shaykh Ibn al-ʿUthaymīn
6:31 - Muftī Muḥammad Ibn Ibrāhīm Āl al-Shaykh
8:24 - Shaykh ʿAbd al-Raḥman Ibn Qāsim
10:55 - Shaykh ʿAbd al-Raḥman al-Saʾdī
16:56 - Al-Qāḍī Abā Buṭayn
Akhi if you put 0:00 at the start then this will show as chapters on the video
"Yusuf climbed his way up the fame ladder by conducting himself like a 15 year old redditor edgelord that attacks Wahabbis like a routine form of daily thikr."🤣🤣😂😂✊✊ That's one of the most savage lines I've ever seen. Using that one against the BIRT A.K.A. AWCON, insha Allah.
These pseudo-Hanbalis think they have a monopoly on the madhab and whoever isn't an Ash'ari is jaahil of the madhab when in fact they are the juhhal
For real
It's pretty awkward because if they were around the time of imam ibn Hanbal, he would have likely wanted to have them x e cuted
Shaykh ul islam Taqiutdeen ibn Taymiyaah rahimallaullah. Ya allah you have made this man a bright star which people with clear hearts can see and some are blinded by his light due to there own biddah and the disease in there hearts. May allah bless ibn taymiyaah. May allah make his grave a part and garden of Paradise jannah and may allah makes us like ibn taymiyaah Rahimaullah
Benefit from Majmoo’ Fatawa wa Rasaa’il of Shaykh ‘Abdullah Aba Butayn رحمه الله
Note: the Shaykh is Shaykh Salih Al Fawzaan’s حفظه الله grandfather
@@user-uy8pg4wv4b correct
That Madrasah al-Hanbaliyyah team is vile 🤮
what are their mistakes akhi?
@user-uy8pg4wv4b I remember Yusuf told us not to buy the Madakhil by Imam Ibn Badran, Sheikh Bakr Abu Zayd and Sheikh Abdullah al-Turki which is a combined 6000 pages of research. Let's instead buy his 200 page pamphlet on the 'Foundational Principles of the Hanbali School'.
@@AwaisKhan-oy8rp he said that ibn badran is more of a salafi
official Hanbali aqeedah books:
Lumatul I'tiqad
Najatul Khalaf
Qala'id al Iqyan
Ayn Wal Athar
Al-Safarinniyah.
There isn’t one official curriculum of creedal works that all Ḥanbalī scholars agreed on, although there are various currents within the madhhab. Other works like al-Wāsiṭīyyah, al-Ḥamawīyyah, al-Tadmurīyyah and Sharḥ Ḥadīth al-Nuzūl by Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah were also recorded to have been studied by Ḥanbalīs historically.
all the books you list contain the abominable tafwid that the ashairah introduced, stop ascribing to the hanabila and denying the kutub as sunnah like that of imam ahmad's disciples, instead you rely on books from 300 years ago
@@junesmardinthen name some hanbali aqeedah books
@@tanzeelfaiz3571 جيد لا مشكلة حبيبي
كتب الحنابلة مثل:
كتاب السنة للخلال
كتاب السنة لحرب
كتاب السنة لعبد الله
الابانة الكبرى لابن بطة
الشرح والابانة لابن بطة
كتاب الشريعة لآجري
صفة العلو لابن قدامة
وغيرها
read his ithbaat sifatul uluww, wherein he even transmits a statement of ibn abdil barr where he transmits an ijma' on how to go about the sifaat, rejecting tafweedhul ma'na. and his refutations on the asharis are well known.
are you a pseudo-hanbali?
This Yusuf Al sadiq figure also has spoke ill of Al Imam Al Barbahari
Maa Shaa Allah brother! Glad you're back!
عمل رائع ودقيق جزاك الله خيرا
Does anyone know where i can get a pdf or purchase a copy of the book that Sh As Sa’idi wrote? The one that Sh Ahmad quoted that it’s a very beneficial treatise
As a patron of this channel I’d really like you to rethink your views on sheikh Yusuf. He is legit and has ijazah from many salafi sheukh. His point in addressing the great salafi scholars the way he does is to create a clear distinction between the Rajih approach of the salafi sheukh and the actually Hanbalis. The salafi sheukh are not 100% Hanbali and their opinions are not authorities in the madhab. They are authorities in what is not the Hanbali madhab. That is the only reason he is speaking of the writings the way he is. Even the sheikh at 6:18 acknowledges this. Hence why sheikh Yusuf, taking the traditional Hanbali approach, is denouncing the explanations from sheikh Ibn uthaymeen RA as positions or contributions to the positions of the Hanbali madhab.
You’re presenting the same objection that was addressed in this video. The presence of different opinions within Ḥanbalī fiqh explanations was done by scholars prior to the Wahhābīs. As for those who’d reached the level of ijtihād - like Ibn al-ʿUthaymīn and al-Saʾdī - their tarjīḥ doesn’t remove their efforts from the works of Ḥanbalī fiqh, nor does it make it quote _”one of the worst Ḥanbalī fiqh books.”_ Not to mention that their tarjīḥ mostly was in line with Shaykh al-Islām Ibn Taymīyyah, who himself is a wajh in the madhhab.
@@ibmsulaymanino I don’t even think it’s possible for a book of fiqh to be “bad” or “worse” than anything unless the author was a complete jahil. I think the intention with the statement is it may be a poor representation of the Hanbali madhab because it is not reflective of the ijma’ of the Hanbali ulema.
so could the same or similar thing be said about those Hanbali books of the earlier scholars that Sh Ahmad al Quaymi mentioned that mention other opinions other than the madhab?
May Allah bless you akhi
This yusuf is a clown, he has no manners and has a vile tongue and calls people idiots without any reason at all. he aligns himself with the asharis and even condemns ibn taymaiyyah. How on earth can you claim to be a hanbali and say anything bad bout ibn taymiyyah? As for his ijazahs, they dont mean anything on their own, they have to be taken into account with his whole person. Even yasir qadhi had a tazkiyyah from ibn Uthaymeen, doesn't mean its until death
yusuf bin sadiq misrepresents that aqidah of the hanabilah who did tafwidh by trying to say that thei aqidah was ta'wil ijmali
assalamu 'alaykum what's the poem at the beginning barakAllahu feek
Noticed the FSA flag in the clip of Shaykh ibn Aqil
What’s FSA akhi?
Free Syrian Army
What's wrong with the FSA? I'm not defending, it's a genuine question.
@@FirstnameLastname-je8kr didn’t say anything is wrong with them, I just noticed it and found it interesting
@@ProudSunniMuslim ah I see. Sorry for the mistake. Thanks
Brother is it permissible to add these black and white effects on pics?
Wa sallamu alykum
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
What AI voice software do you use?
Akhi Ibrahim are you hanbali ?
The Juhaal of this channel following Hanbali Madhab at all?
Cry najdi 🤣
Honestly there is nothing more underwhelming than you children regurgitating buzz words you pick up from the internet. Never has anyone with your childish slogans ever produced a strong argument against us lol. All you do is call us names and throw emojis just like little children.
Are you ashari ya zindeeq??
No one is crying brother. May Allah forgive you.
@@AadilKapadia-mv9sg he's not our brother lol
Your Yusuf Ibn Sadiq Al Quburi's teacher at Al Azhar has praised scholars of Najd and Shaikh Uthaymeen.So Al Quburi should first speak ill of his own teacher.😂😂😂😂😂